Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
PAPER
WOMEN EMPOWERMENT
SUBMITTED BY:
FATIMA PERVEZ.
NOOR FATIMA.
WOMEN EMPOWERMENT
INTRODUCTION
Since the creation of Pakistan in 1947 Pakistan inherited the menace of poverty.
The burden of this poverty was put heavily on the female population which is
50% of the total population of Pakistan. ON the top of it, women were
neglected and under-nourished. The concept of women empowerment emerged
in 1980’.The promotion of women’s empowerment as a development goal is
based on a dual argument, that social justice is an important aspect of human
welfare and is worth pursuing and that’s women empowerment is a means to
other ends.
“Women’s ability to make strategic life choices where that ability had been
previously denied them” (Kabeer 1999).
LITERATURE REVIEW:
Empowerment means access to optimist, education, information and resources,
decision making power and authority and content over one’s own life. The
concept of women’s empowerment appears to be the outcome of several
important critiques and debates generated by the women’s movement
throughout the world and particularly to the third world countries. Its source can
be traced to the interaction between feminism and the concept of popular
education developed in Latin America in the 1970’s.
• Only 29% of labor force is constituted by women, below the 33% average
for south Asian countries.
• Life expectancy at birth for women is lower than for men in Pakistan,
making it one of only four countries on the world where men live longer
than women.
EMPOWERING WOMEN:
The United Nations fact sheet on the “Feminization of poverty” highlights that;
GENDER DISCRIMINATION:
Gender discrimination refers to the practice of granting or denying rights or
privileges to a person based on their gender. In some societies, this practice is
longstanding and acceptable to both genders. Certain religious groups embrace
gender discrimination as part of their dogma. However, in most industrialized
nations, it is either illegal or generally considered inappropriate.
Attitudes toward gender discrimination can normally be traced back to the roots of
certain segments of society. Much of the discrimination is attributed to stories such
as a woman being made from man’s rib and societal practices such as dowries paid
to fathers by prospective husbands to purchase their daughters to be wives.
Countless literary fiction references are made to females being the fairer, weaker
sex and males being the strong, invincible hunters of the world. The combined
power of these societal and religious beliefs left little room for equitable thinking
for centuries.
Discrimination plays out with networking and in preferential treatment within the
economic market. Men typically occupy positions of power within the job
economy (Aslam, 2002). Gender inequality can further be understood through the
mechanisms of sexism. Discrimination takes place in this manner as men and
women are subject to prejudicial treatment on the basis of gender alone (Mutume,
2001)opportunities and limited occupations.
GENDER INEQUALITY:
Life expectancy differentials exist between men and women. Given the
fact that maximum potential life expectancy for women is greater than
men under uniform treatment in nutrition, health, care and other
conditions of living, this biological advantage is negated when we
observe that in developing countries, e.g. Pakistan, Bangladesh and
India, female life expectancy is lower than the males. This proves a
major evidence of anti female bias in these countries.
Conservative society
Increase in unemployment
The Global Gender Gap Report 2013, published by the World Economic Forum
in collaboration with faculty at Harvard University and the University of
California, Berkeley, assesses 136 countries, representing more than 93 per cent
of the world’s population, on how well resources and opportunities are divided
among male and female populations.
According to the index, Iceland tops the list with the most equitable sharing of
resources among the sexes, followed closely by north European countries such
as Finland, Norway and Sweden.
Pakistan comes down at 135, followed only by Yemen, and its score has fallen
three spots since the study was conducted last year.
The comprehensive annual report measures the size of the gender inequality gap
in four areas, including economic participation and opportunity (salaries,
participation and highly skilled employment), educational attainment (access to
basic and higher levels of education), political empowerment (representation in
decision-making structures), health and survival (life expectancy and sex ratio).
According to the index, Pakistan ranks second-worst in economic participation
and opportunity, eighth-worst in terms of equal access to education, 13th from
the bottom in terms of health and survival.
Surprisingly, the magnitude of disparities is much smaller in Pakistan when it
comes to political empowerment and representation in decision-making
structures among the two sexes, with a rank of 64 among 136 countries.
Among neighboring countries, China ranked at 69, Bangladesh at 75, India at
101 and Iran at 130. Afghanistan was not included in the study.
Global gender gap narrows slightly in 2013
According to the report, gender disparity narrowed slightly in the current year
on the back of definite if not universal improvements in economic equality and
political participation between the sexes.
Overall, the report found Iceland the most advanced country in the world in
terms of gender equality for the fifth year running. It, along with, Finland (2nd),
Norway (3rd) and Sweden (4th), has now closed over 80 per cent of its gender
gap. These countries were joined in the top 10 by the Philippines, which enter
the top five for the first time, Ireland (6th), New Zealand (7th), Denmark (8th),
Switzerland (9th) and Nicaragua (10th).
At the global level, the report found that in 2013, 96 per cent of the health and
survival gender gap has now been closed. “It is the only one of the four pillars
that has widened since the report was first compiled in 2006.”
The global gender gap stands at 93 per cent in terms of education, with 25
countries having closed their gaps completely.
The report says gender gaps for economic equality and political participation are
only 60 per cent and 21 per cent closed respectively, although progress is being
made in these areas, with political participation narrowing by almost 2 per cent
over the last year.
In both developing and developed countries alike, relative to the numbers of
women in tertiary education and in the workforce overall, women’s presence in
economic leadership positions is limited, it adds.