Scribd Logo
Загрузить

Добро пожаловать в Scribd!

  • ROB - Comparison

    Загружено:

    vinoraam
    30 просмотров6 страниц
    The document compares the design parameters of bridges with 30m and 36m spans. It shows that increasing the span from 30m to 36m requires increasing the girder depth, area, and moments of inertia. Similarly, further increasing the span to 42m requires greater increases in these design values. The summary also compares the original design values to actual values achieved, showing the actual values are typically lower than the original allowable capacities.

    Исходное описание:

    ROB - Comparison

    Авторское право

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Доступные форматы

    XLSX, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd

    Этот документ был вам полезен?

    Это неприемлемый материал?

    Пожаловаться на этот документ
    The document compares the design parameters of bridges with 30m and 36m spans. It shows that increasing the span from 30m to 36m requires increasing the girder depth, area, and moments of inertia. Similarly, further increasing the span to 42m requires greater increases in these design values. The summary also compares the original design values to actual values achieved, showing the actual values are typically lower than the original allowable capacities.

    Авторское право:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Скачайте в формате XLSX, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
    Отметить как неприемлемый контент
    30 просмотров6 страниц

    ROB - Comparison

    Загружено:

    vinoraam
    The document compares the design parameters of bridges with 30m and 36m spans. It shows that increasing the span from 30m to 36m requires increasing the girder depth, area, and moments of inertia. Similarly, further increasing the span to 42m requires greater increases in these design values. The summary also compares the original design values to actual values achieved, showing the actual values are typically lower than the original allowable capacities.

    Авторское право:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Скачайте в формате XLSX, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
    Отметить как неприемлемый контент
    из 6

    COMPARISON TABLE

    Description Unit 30m - RDSO % Increase 36m - RDSO

    Effective Span - L m 30 36.00


    Spacing of Girders m 2.5 2.50
    Cantilever Span of slab m 1.6 max 1.6 max
    Steel Girder Depth - D1 mm 1375 1631
    L/D1 ---- 21.82 22.07
    Thickness of Deck Slab mm 250 250
    Thickness of Deck Haunch mm 50 50
    Overall Superstructure Depth - D2 mm 1675 1931
    L/D2 ---- 17.91 18.64
    Allowable Deflection ( L/800) mm 37.50 45.00
    Deflection under Live Load mm ----
    STEEL GIRDER DETAILS
    Grade of Steel Girder ---- Fe250 Fe250
    Girder - Depth mm 1375 1631
    Girder - Top Flange mm x mm 400 x 25 400 x 36
    Girder - Bottom Flange mm x mm 900 x 50 850 x 45
    Girder - Web mm x mm 12 x 1250 16 x 1500
    Girder - Area sq.mm 70600 8.84% 77450
    Girder - Weight /m kg/m 555 7.81% 602
    Girder - Moment of Inertia mm^4 1.91E+10 43.22% 3.37E+10
    Section Modulus - Bottom mm^3 5.26E+07 10.42% 5.87E+07
    Section Modulus - Top mm^3 1.89E+07 40.63% 3.18E+07

    COMPOSITE STEEL GIRDER DETAILS


    Grade of Steel Girder ---- Fe250 Fe250
    Girder - Depth mm 1675 1881
    Girder - Area sq.mm 113933 5.67% 120783
    Girder - Moment of Inertia_Long Term mm^4 5.57E+10 14.16% 6.48E+10
    Section Modulus - Bottom_Long Term mm^3 6.91E+07 6.59% 7.40E+07
    Section Modulus - Top_Long Term mm^3 6.40E+07 20.60% 8.06E+07

    Web Stiffener - size 160 x 12 140 x12


    Web Stiffener - spacing 1570 to 1920 1500 to 1808

    End Stiffener - size 190 x 20 190 x 20

    Internal Bracing - member


    Internal Bracing - spacing

    Shear Studs - dia 25 25


    Shear Studs -nos. In a row 3 3

    Reference : RDSO drawing no. RDSO/B - 11775 Dated 31/10/2016


    % Increase 42m - Revised

    42.00
    2.30
    1.15
    2000
    21.00
    250
    50
    2300
    18.26
    52.50
    26.20

    Fe350
    2000
    620 x 28
    820 x 40
    20 x 1932
    12.78% 88800
    13.63% 697
    41.92% 5.79E+10
    15.61% 6.95E+07
    35.92% 4.97E+07

    Fe350
    2250
    6.76% 129533
    39.21% 1.07E+11
    13.46% 8.55E+07
    20.46% 1.01E+08

    150 x12
    1750

    240 x20

    2 ISMC 100
    7000

    22
    4

    ated 31/10/2016
    SUMMARY OF DESIGN VALUES

    Original Design
    Clause Heading unit Capacity / Actual Ratio
    Allowable

    Sec 5.4.1 Ultimate BM kNm 22760 16400 0.72

    Sec 5.4.2 Ultimate Shear Strength kN 5805 1575 0.27

    Sec 5.4.3 Stress Check - SLS - Steel MPa 287.00 185.00 0.64

    Sec 5.4.3 Stress Check - SLS -Concrte MPa 13.33 11.44 0.86

    Sec 5.4.4 Deflection under LL mm 52.50 33.00 0.63

    Sec 5.4.4 Fatigue Check- Bending MPa 78.00 33.00 0.42

    Sec 5.4.4 Fatigue Check- Shear MPa 78.00 7.00 0.09

    # Sensitivity: LNT Construction Internal Use


    Proposed Design
    Capacity / Actual Ratio
    Allowable

    28337 16497 0.58

    5709 1696 0.30

    287.00 164.00 0.57

    13.33 10.23 0.77

    52.50 26.20 0.50

    78.00 26.39 0.34

    78.00 7.06 0.09

    # Sensitivity: LNT Construction Internal Use

    Вам также может понравиться