See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/281117096

OMFS has lessons for other surgical specialties

Article  in  BMJ (online) · August 2015

CITATIONS READS

0 80

2 authors, including:

Patrick Magennis
Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
177 PUBLICATIONS   1,507 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Curricula in OMFS View project

Academic background of OMFS trainees View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Patrick Magennis on 21 August 2015.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Vie
ew Rapid
d Responsses 

View
w rapid respponses to "W ger the goldden ticket" bby Ian Eardlley, Humphhrey
Why a careeer in surgerry is no long
Scott, David Wilkinson
W

httpp://careers.bmj.com/carreers/advicee/view-rapidd-responses.html?id=200023162

OMMFS has lessons for oth her surgicaal specialtiees

08/008/2015 Patrrick Magennnis, Anne Begley
B
Theere are threee surgical sppecialties whhich recruitt directly to ST1 but onnly two weree mentioned d by the
authhors. As well as Neurossurgery andd Cardiothorracic surgerry, Oral andd Maxillofaccial Surgery y (OMFS)
currrently is runnning a pilott of 'run-thrrough' trainiing alongsid
de our ST3 recruitment
r t. So we aree the only
speccialty to havve the optioons of ST1 or o ST3 entryy. In the firsst round of national
n reccruitment too ST1, Oral and
Maxxillofacial Surgery
S (OM
MFS) had thhe highest application
a ratio
r across medicine aand surgery. In the secoond
rounnd it was aggain towardss the top. Our
O applicatiions at ST3 over the saame rounds hhad fewer applicants
a thhan
postts. So we feeel OMFS has h two lessoons which are a relevant to this papeer. As menttioned by th he authors, Core
C
Traiining is lesss attractive to
t those inteerested in a surgical caareer becausse it has lesss certainty th
han run-
throough posts. The
T secondd lesson we have learnt is that wheen recruitingg you have tto start youn ng. Our
speccialty association, the British
B Assoociation of Oral
O and Maxillofacial Surgery, suupplies smaall bursaries to
encoourage denttal and meddical studentts to undertaake self-seleected study modules inn OMFS durring their tim me
as undergradua
u ates. Enthuse the underrgraduates, and a the grad duates will follow.
f
Copy of article to which response made
Why a career in surgery is no longer the golden ticket
Authors: Ian Eardley, Humphrey Scott, David Wilkinson

Publication date: 04 Αυγ 2015

Surgery used to be one of the most sought-after medical specialties. Ian Eardley, Humphrey Scott, and
David Wilkinson consider why it is attracting fewer candidates

Historically, surgery has been one of the most popular medical careers and there has almost always been a
surfeit of candidates over vacancies. In 2014, however, while selection into specialty training for the 10
surgical specialties was as competitive as ever, it was not possible to fill every training post.

Since 2011, the introduction of single centre national selection processes has made it easier to find out the
exact numbers of candidates for core surgery. The number of applicants and the number being interviewed
for core surgical training have remained relatively stable, but the overall fill rates after the first round of
recruitment have reduced. In 2014, the fill rate for core surgery lagged behind acute care common stem
(100%), anaesthesia (98%), clinical radiology (100%), ophthalmology (100%), and public health (100%).
The surgical specialties that recruited into run-through training at specialty training year one (ST1)—
neurosurgery and cardiothoracic surgery—also achieved 100% fill rates.

Geographical differences
Further analysis of the data shows that appreciable geographical differences partly explain these figures. In
Northern Ireland and Scotland, for example, just 45% and 75% of posts respectively were filled, compared
with 100% in the north east and east of England, London, and Kent, Surrey and Sussex. Furthermore, 134 of
the 2014 applicants who were successful at interview withdrew from the core surgical recruitment process
and accepted posts in other specialties.

It is clear to us that several things are happening. Firstly, trainees are becoming increasingly specific about
where they want to work, with many wanting to train in the south east. For example, 36% of trainees put
London as their first choice despite only 12.3% of the available posts being in London.

Secondly, remarkably few trainees are using clearing to obtain any of the vacant posts. This implies that
either they did not wish to work in locations that were still open or they had obtained a post in another
specialty in a location more suited to them. This geographical differential in fill rates is something that has
been seen in other specialties, most notably general practice.

Although recruitment is still relatively strong, it seems that applying for core surgical training is less popular
than it was in the past. But why is this the case?

Sex factors
One factor could be the increasing numbers of women in medicine, for whom surgery is still not a popular
career option. Between 2012 and 2014, 36% of applicants for core surgical training were women, although
they accounted for around 55% of medical school graduates in 2012. If surgery continues to be seen as a
male dominated discipline and women choose not to apply, we shall be fishing in an increasingly small
pond.
The decreasing numbers of international medical graduates entering the United Kingdom could also be to
blame. In 2007, one in seven doctors under the age of 30 was from overseas, but in 2012 this had fallen to
one in 20. Many of these graduates had previously sought surgical posts.

Another reason may be the general decrease in number of doctors who enter any specialty training having
successfully completed foundation year 2 (F2). In 2011, 71% entered specialty training from F2, but in 2013
this had fallen to 64%.

The perception that a surgical career makes greater demands on one’s work-life balance than other
postgraduate medical careers is another important factor. One recent survey of final year medical students
found that the single most important reason for not entering a surgical career was that “it doesn’t fit with
lifestyle or family commitments.” [1] This was particularly a problem for female trainees, 85% of whom
cited this reason compared with 12% of men. Male trainees were more likely to cite poor anatomy teaching
as a reason—74% of men raised this point compared with 57% of women.

There is also the general dissatisfaction with surgical training that is repeatedly shown in the General
Medical Council trainee survey. In 2014, surgery once again was at the bottom of the league table of
medical and surgical specialties, with 77% satisfaction compared with general practice at 89%, anaesthesia
at 86%, and radiology at 84%.[2]

The decreasing popularity of core surgical training may also reflect the differential satisfaction shown in the
2014 GMC survey between specialty surgical training and core surgical training. Satisfaction in specialty
training was relatively high at 86%, falling to 77% in core surgical training, and falling even further to 72%
in foundation surgery.[2] The findings in the 2015 GMC survey are similar.

Lack of support
This last issue is perhaps a major problem. If trainees have a poor experience in foundation surgical posts,
they may well choose not to pursue a surgical career. Surgical F1 posts are different from the surgical house
jobs that more senior surgeons may recall. Although the hours were long, the jobs were less intense and
there was continuity of patient care, with a coherent firm structure.

Today’s surgical F1 posts are usually part of a shift system, and many trainees feel poorly supported.
Trainees are often faced with much ward based and administrative work with few opportunities in theatre
and the outpatient clinic. Surgical foundation posts are being removed to increase exposure to primary and
community or psychiatric care as part of the Broadening the Foundation initiative.[3] If no action is taken,
there is a danger that service pressures on the remaining trainees will increase, further reducing educational
quality.

If these are the problems, what are the solutions?

Solutions
With the reduction in surgical F1 posts across the UK, we need to develop different models of surgical care,
perhaps using physician associates, surgical care practitioners, and advanced clinical practitioners. This has
the potential to improve the learning environment for students and trainees by sharing some of the
administrative and ward based jobs that form much of the work of a junior doctor. It would require the
commitment of higher education institutions and employers to new workforce models, but surgeons will
need to ensure that these professionals are valued and supported as an integral part of the surgical team.

The profession needs to dispel the perception that surgery is a male dominated specialty. This is not just
about work-life balance, which is also important, but also about dealing with perceptions of the culture and
the difficulty of fitting in.
Recruitment into surgical specialties that offer run-through training has maintained 100% fill rates, and it
may be that surgery should re-examine this. Run-through training may be attractive because of the security
that comes from not having to compete for a job again at ST3, although it does mean that trainees need to
decide at an early stage what they want to do.

The profession and colleges should also examine the place of surgery and the surgical sciences, most
notably anatomy, in the medical school curriculum. Most importantly, however, trainees need positive role
models who will engage and inspire them and dispel myths and stereotypes about sex, personality, and lack
of work-life balance. Surgeons everywhere have a responsibility to engage with and support all their surgical
trainees but particularly those at foundation level to ensure that surgical training does not become
increasingly unpopular.

Competing interests: We have read and understood BMJ’s policy on declaration of interests and declare the
following interests: HS is a Health Education England employee as a head of school of surgery; DW is a
Health Education England employee, as a postgraduate dean; and IE was until 1 January 2015 chair of the
Joint Committee for Surgical Training (unpaid).

References

1. Jaunoo SS, King TR, Baker RF, Adama HL. A national survey of reasons why students and junior
doctors choose not to pursue a career in surgery. Ann T Coll Surg Engl 2014;96(suppl):192-4.

2. General Medical Council. National training survey 2014. www.gmc-

uk.org/NTS_2014__KFR_A4.pdf_56706809.pdf.

3. Health Education England. Broadening the foundation programme. http://hee.nhs.uk/work-

programmes/btbc/broadening-the-foundation-programme/.

Ian Eardley consultant urologist, Leeds Teaching Hospital Trust and immediate past chairman of the Joint
Committee on Surgical Training
Humphrey Scott consultant surgeon, Ashford and St Peter’s NHS Trust, head of School of Surgery, chair of
the Confederation of Postgraduate Schools of Surgery
David Wilkinson postgraduate dean, Health Education Yorkshire and the Humber

ian.eardley@btinternet.com

View publication stats