Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Chest 1980;78;559-564
DOI 10.1378/chest.78.4.559
The online version of this article, along with updated information and services
can be found online on the World Wide Web at:
http://chestjournal.chestpubs.org/content/78/4/559
Chest is the official journal of the American College of Chest Physicians. It has
been published monthly since 1935. Copyright1980by the American College of
Chest Physicians, 3300 Dundee Road, Northbrook, IL 60062. All rights
reserved. No part of this article or PDF may be reproduced or distributed
without the prior written permission of the copyright holder.
(http://chestjournal.chestpubs.org/site/misc/reprints.xhtml) ISSN:0012-3692
There is no documentation in the literature of the risk of postural drainage alone, and had fallen another 5.3 mm
hypoxemia after chest percussion in acutely ill adults Hg (P < 0.01)30 minutes after return to the pretreatment
with nonsurgical pulmonary disorders. We studied the position. There was no significant change in Pa02 in 12
immediate effect of postural drainage and chest percus- patients who produced moderate to large amounts of mu-
sion (PDP) on oxygenation in 22 hospitalized patients copurulent secretions. The fall in Pa02 was probably due
with a variety of acute, nonsurgical pulmonary disor- to increased ventilation-perfusion mismatch since this fall
ders. Heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure, and was avoided in two patients restudied while receiving 100
arterial blood gas levels were measured at four points percent oxygen. We conclude that all acutely ill patients
before, during, and after PDP. There was a significant receiving PDP should he carefully monitored and, if
fall in Pa02 after chest percussion in ten patients who necessary, should receive increased levels of inspired
produced no sputum or small amounts of mucoid sputum. oxygen to avoid hypoxemia. Our data suggest that the
The mean Pa02 fell 16.8 mm Hg (P < 0.05) immediately use of PDP in patients without sputum production is not
after PDP, when compared to the value obtained after indicated and is potentially dangerous.
C hest physical therapy in the form of postural tion following PDP. Holloway et a17 reported a
drainage and percussion (PDP) has long been decrease in Pa02 in neonates after PDP. Gormezano
used as adjunct therapy in the care of patients with and Branthwaite8 demonstrated a significant reduc-
acute and chronic pulmonary disease. In 1953, Pal- tion in PaOz in 13 postoperative patients who had
mer and Sellick1 showed PDP to be of value in the cardiovascular complications, but no change in 11
prevention of atelectasis after abdominal surgery. patients treated for respiratory failure. One study,9
Since that time, PDP has been used increasingly reported in abstract form, found a significant drop in
in the care of patients with chronic lung disease, Pa02 in 17 patients, but the patients and their dis-
both in the stable phase of their illness and during eases were not described. Thus, there are only two
acute exacerbations, and in patients with acute pul- reports in adult patients of a fall in Pa02 result-
monary disease such as pneumonia, acute bronchitis, ing from PDP, and the only complete published
aspiration, and atelectasis. Despite the widespread study concerns postoperative patients with cardio-
employment of this form of therapy, Jones,2 in his vascular complications. The risk of hypoxemia with
review of the subject, found little objective data to PDP in acutely ill, adult, nonsurgical patients, prob-
support its use in chronic and acute lung disease. ably the largest group receiving this therapy in the
Studies of the immediate effects of PDP on oxy- hospital setting, has not been documented.
genation have produced equivocal results. Finer and This fact, along with reports of significant ar-
Boyd3 reported a significant increase in arterial oxy- rhythmias9 and even cardiac arrest1#{176}during chest
gen tension (Pa02) after PDP in a controlled study physical therapy, prompted us to assess this treat-
of 20 neonates with respiratory distress. A number of ment modality in a population of acutely ill, adult,
studies in patients with stable chronic bronchi- nonsurgical patients with a variety of lung disorders.
tis, stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Our study was designed to document the risk, if any,
(COPD), or trauma found no change in oxygena- of hypoxemia after PDP and to characterize the
population at risk.
From the Departments of Medicine and Rehabilitative Serv-
ices, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Okla-
homa City. METHODS
Supported by the Oklahoma Lung Association and the Na-
tional Institute of Health grants HLO 7155 and HLO 7210. A total of 22 patients (13 men and 9 women), ranging in
fParker B. Francis Fellow in Pulmonary Research. age from 23 to 95 years, were included in this study. They
Manuscript received September 14; revision accepted De- were drawn from inpatients at the University of Oklahoma
cember 4.
Health Sciences Center who were referred by their primary
Repnn* requests: Dr. Rogers, University of Oklahoma Health
Sciences Center, P0 Box 26901, Oklahoma City 73190 physicians to the physical therapy department for postural
at the time of the study. Those on the assist-control mode had Smoking history 8/12 7/7*
their sighs turned off from the time they were placed in the > 30 pack years 5/8 7/7*
Trendelenburg position until the measurements were taken at Number of cigarettes/day 28 32
point 3, a period of approximately 15 minutes. All other
Chronic bronchitis 8/12 5/7*
respirator settings were left unchanged. All four blood pres-
sure measurements were taken on the same arm using a > 5 years 7/8 4/5
standard blood pressure cuff. All blood gases were drawn tHistory unobtainable in three patients.
, .
(breaths/mm) 24.1 ±2.4 25.0 ±2.4 24.6 ±2.4 22.3 ± 1.9
/ /
100
Group 2
so
Pa02, mm Hg 86.0 ±9.4 90.0 ± 12.4 73.2 ± 6.Ot 67.9 ±4.6t /
a 0
PaCO2,mmllg 41.6 ± 3.5 41.8 ± 3.5 41.3 ± 3.5 41.0 ± 3.4 80 /
C
pH 7.44±.02 7.44±02 7.45±.02 7.45±.01 a /5
-20
I I I
Ficums
groups
1. Percent
is plotted at point
1
change
in Pa02
1, baseline;
from baseline
2
for both
point 2, after 5 minutes
3 4
- 1
I
2
I
3
I
4
I
of postural drainage alone; point 3, after 10 minutes of chest FIGURE 2B. This patient had fall in Pa02 seen both after
percussion; and point 4, 30 minutes after return to baseline postural drainage alone and after PDP. This fall was not
position. (Actual values for Pa02 are recorded on Table 2.) present on 100 percent oxygen.
augment the clearance of sputum from the airways al,14 in a study of 19 patients with cystic fibrosis or
by bringing the force of gravity and vibration to the chronic bronchitis who expectorated an average of
aid of the normal airway clearance mechanisms. If 15 ml of sputum during a one-hour study period,
PDP succeeds in doing this, then, acutely, measur- found a significant increase in expiratory flow rates
able improvement should be seen in several related at low lung volumes. Recently, Bateman et al’#{176}
factors. These factors would include increased spu- reported increased clearance of deposited radio-
tum production, more even distribution of ventila- aerosol and increased sputum volume in ten patients
tion, increased expiratory flow rates, reduced airway with stable chronic airways obstruction and an aver-
resistance, increased vital capacity, and improved age daily sputum volume of 100 ml. Thus, PDP does
oxygenation. The expected long-term results of this seem to have desirable acute effects in patients with
therapy would be more rapid improvement in the large volumes of secretions. Conversely, there is
clinical signs of disease, x-ray abnormalities, pulmo- little documentation of acute benefit from PDP in
nary function, and gas exchange. Indeed, there is a
patients with small amounts of secretions. Thus, the
significant increase in sputum volume acutely after same group which we have shown to be at risk for
postural drainage and percussion.4 Measurements of hypoxemia after PDP also appears to be the least
likely to benefit from this treatment.
acute changes in lung volume and flow rates give
conflicting and inconclusive results,4’5’2”3 al- The cause of hypoxemia noted after PDP is un-
though recently, Feldman et al’4 found significant known; however, there are a number of possible
improvement in flows at low lung volumes despite mechanisms which might explain it. An increase in
no change in FEy,. Those studies which measure ventilation-perfusion (V/ Q) mismatch can cause an
airway resistance and specific conductance also give acute reduction in PaOi. There are several events
conflicting results.5”3 Three controlled long-term which might lead to uneven V/Q matching during
studies of PDP in hospitalized patients with acute and after chest percussion: (1) shifting of mucus
exacerbations of chronic bronchitis’5”6 or acute from peripheral airways to converge in a large, cen-
pneumonia’7 show no increase in sputum volume, tral airway could reduce ventilation to a larger area
no change in the rate of defervescence, no change in of perfused lung; (2), bronchospasm could cause an
the resolution of x-ray abnormalities, and no im- acute increase in V/Q mismatch (Campbell et aP2
provement of pulmonary function or gas exchange. demonstrated a decrease in FEy, after PDP in
Thus, the effectiveness of PDP as a treatment seven patients with an exacerbation of their chronic
modality in acute and chronic pulmonary disease is bronchitis which was reversible with bronchodila-
subject to question. tors); and (3) lung compression due to chest per-
The volume and character of the sputum appear cussion may cause narrowing of airways or even
to be important factors in separating the patients premature airway closure at the resulting smaller
that develop hypoxemia from those who do not. We lung volumes, reducing ventilation to these areas.
found a significant reduction in PaOm after chest Ventilation-perfusion mismatch is the likely cause of
percussion only in those patients who produced no the hypoxemia noted in our patients since adrninis-
sputum or small amounts of mucoid secretions as a tration of 100 percent oxygen in two of our patients
result of the therapy. The patients in group 1, who blocked the reduction in PaOi at point three.
produced moderate to large amounts of muco- We assume that the fall in PaOs corresponds with
purulent sputum, had a slight, but not significant, an increase in alveolar-arterial oxygen difference
improvement in oxygenation as a result of chest (P{A-a]Os). The P(A-a)Om was not determined in