Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
2 / 30 © Wärtsilä April 2012 Wärtsilä Hamworthy SOx Scrubber / H. johannessen Doc.ID: Revision: Status:
Emissions and Environment
3 © Wärtsilä. STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL. This document is the property of Wärtsilä Corporation and shall not be copied or reproduced without the consent of the owner.
North American SOX and NOX ECA
4 © Wärtsilä. STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL. This document is the property of Wärtsilä Corporation and shall not be copied or reproduced without the consent of the owner.
IMO SOX Emission Control Areas
Geographically defined SOx Emission Control Areas
North
Sea
Baltic
BalticSea
Sea
English Channel
5 © Wärtsilä. STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL. This document is the property of Wärtsilä Corporation and shall not be copied or reproduced without the consent of the owner.
IMO & EU Sulphur Limits
4.5
World
3.5
1.5
ECA
1.0
0.5
EU in ports
0.1
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2012
2020
2021
2022
2008
2009
2010
2011
Fuel type Not regulated = both HFO and distillate are permitted.
Exhaust gas cleaning Permitted alternative under Regulation 4 to achieve any regulated limit.
Particulate Matter (PM) No limit values.
6
Alternatives to reducing SOx
USE SCRUBBERS Works with high S HFO ROI depends on fuel oil price
Install an exhaust gas Lowest total lifecycle cost difference between low S fuel
cleaning system (scrubber). Use everywhere oil and high S HFO
Easy operation
Fuel prices (Rotterdam)
1400
MGO 0.1% S
1300
MDO
1200 LS380 1.0% S
1100 LS380 1.5% S
1000 IFO380
Price (USD/t)
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
Date
8 © Wärtsilä. STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL. This document is the property of Wärtsilä Corporation and shall not be copied or reproduced without the consent of the owner.
Cost comparison for 25 years
The Big Picture Total engine power: 10 MW
Annual fuel consumption: 9800 ton/a
*System delivery cost (not including installation) Annual average load: 69%
Fuel prices are prices in Rotterdam Interest rate for NPV calculations: 5.0%
Case 1: 31.08.2010 Fuel price inflation rate: 4.8% (1980-2010 average)
Case 2: August 2008 Currency rate: 1.27 US$/€
Case 3: May 2008 NaOH 50%: 200€/ton
Scrubber OPEX
Cost comparison for 25 years HFO OPEX
Case 1 HFO 428 US$/ton, MGO 649 US$/ton MGO OPEX
Case 2 HFO 244 US$/ton, MGO 646 US$/ton OPEX SAVINGS
SCRUBBER INVESTMENT COST*
Case 3 HFO 580 US$/ton, MGO 1282 US$/ton Payback time
300,000,000 10
9
250,000,000
8
7
200,000,000
6 Y
E
e
u
150,000,000 5 a
r
r
o 4 s
100,000,000
3
2
50,000,000
1
0 0
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3
9 © Wärtsilä. STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL. This document is the property of Wärtsilä Corporation and shall not be copied or reproduced without the consent of the owner.
Seawater scrubbing system chemistry
Scrubber Chemistry:
SO2 + H2O → H2SO3 (Sulphurous Acid)
SO3 + H2O → H2SO4 (Sulphuric Acid)
Scrubber Reactions:
CaCO3 + H2SO3 → CaSO3 + H2O + CO2
2CaSO3 + O2 → 2CaSO4 (Calsiumsulphate)
Finland
• Open sea alkalinity
• Surface data (0… 15 m)
• Data from 2001-2005
Sweden
• Typical open sea alcalinity
outside Baltic Sea is ca.
2200 – 2400 µmol/L
SOx Scrubbers and Survey Schemes
Not dependent on seawater alkalinity Dependent on seawater alkalinity (issue for limited Possibility to operate independently from
areas such as lakes, few ports close to estuaries, seawater alkalinity for a limited period (
Northern and Eastern part of Baltic Sea; limitation: limitation: 1000 umol / L)
1000 umol / L)
Zero effluent discharge for some time No possibility for zero discharge Zero effluent discharge for limited period
Needs caustic soda as a reagent No need of NaOH (and logistics) Needs caustic soda for intended closed
loop operations
Low power demand (0,5-1,0 % additional Slightly higher power demand (2,0 % additional Slightly higher power demand (2,0 %
engine power demand) engine power demand) additional engine power demand)
Slightly more complex system Simple system Slightly more complex system
Needs FW (possibility to use AWP treated No need for additional FW No need for additional FW
water)
No issues related to sea chests Sea chest capacity (retrofits) Sea chest capacity (retrofits)
More tank requirements (alkali, buffer tank, Lower tank space demand (residence tank, sludge More tank requirements (alkali, 2x
holding tank, sludge tank) tank) residence tanks, holding tank, sludge tank)
12 © Wärtsilä This document is the property of Wärtsilä Corporation and shall not be copied or reproduced without the consent of the owner. © Wärtsilä
SOx Scrubbers and Survey Schemes
Type of scrubber
Fresh water Sea water Hybrid
Alkaline reactant NaOH Sea water NaOH / SW
Operating modes Closed loop Open loop Closed / open loop
Zero discharge mode Periodical No Periodical
Scrubbing water flow, m3/MWh 24 45 24/45
Fresh water consumption, m3/MWh 0.1…0.2 Zero 0.1…0.2 / zero
Water piping, m3 (large cruise ship) 18 41 > SWS
Pumping power, % of engine power* 0.5 1.4 0.5/1.4
Suitable certification scheme** Scheme A or B Scheme B Scheme B
* In case of Integrated Scrubber additionally fan power, load dependent, 0.1 – 0.5 %
** Refers to IMO Resolution MEPC.184(59)
13 © Wärtsilä. STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL. This document is the property of Wärtsilä Corporation and shall not be copied or reproduced without the consent of the owner.
Scrubber approval alternatives according to IMO
Optional Return
pump
Water treatment
Water
Water monitoring
Monitoring De-aeration
vessel
Sludge Tank
Wash water
discharge
Scrubber
Supply pump In port reaction
water pump
Wärtsilä Hybrid scrubber
HMI Control
Cabinet
Scrubber unit
De-aeration
vessel
Water
Monitoring
Wärtsilä Closed loop scrubber
Exhaust gas fan module
Scrubber unit
(4.4m x 9.2m)
By-pass valves
Freshwater in
Scrubbing water
pump module
Effluent
monitoring
Sludge tank
20 © Wärtsilä. STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL. This document is the property of Wärtsilä Corporation and shall not be copied or reproduced without the consent of the owner.
Sludge Seawater Systems
The amount depends on silt content in water and engine running profile
Hybrid – Wilhelmsen
• Vessel : MV Tamesis
• Size of SWS : 1 x 25 MW
1 x 6 MW
• Performance :
– 97% SOx Removal
– 85 % Particulate Removal
– 3,5% fuel sulphur content
22 © Wärtsilä This document is the property of Wärtsilä Corporation and shall not be copied or reproduced without the consent of the owner. © Wärtsilä
Wärtsilä’s unparalleled reference list
• Performance :
– 97% SOx Removal
– 85 % Particulate Removal
– 3,5% fuel sulphur content
Wärtsilä’s unparalleled reference list
• Delivery :
January 2011 January 2012
July 2011 June 2012
• Performance :
– 98% SOx Removal
– 60-80% Particulate Removal
– Up to 4,5% fuel sulphur content
– Prepared for main engine scrubbing
Wärtsilä Moss Test Facility
25 © Wärtsilä This document is the property of Wärtsilä Corporation and shall not be copied or reproduced without the consent of the owner. © Wärtsilä
Scrubber installation, retrofit aspects
morten.letnes@wartsila.com