Design IS 37

TRAFFIC CENSUS
( For Design of Crust by IRC:37-2012 & IRC:SP:62-2014 )

WEEKLY TRAFFIC SUMMARY
FROM TO ROAD CLASSIFICATION
KILOMETREAGE :
DETAILS OF TRAFFIC CENSUS POINT : ROUTE NO. (IF ANY) :
DISTRICT
Ref : IRC:9-1972 & IRC:64-1990
PERIOD FAST VEHICLES
FROM TO MOTOR PASSENGER LIGHT AGRICULTURAL BUS TRUCK CYCLE
CYCLE, CAR, PICK UP COMMERCIAL TRACTOR
SCOOTER VAN OR AUTO VEHICLE (LCV)
RICKSHAW WITHOUT WITH
MCV/HCV TRAILOR
DATE HOUR DATE HOUR TRAILOR TRAILOR
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
2032 123 34 45 34 22 376 45 3027
2098 136 23 44 38 24 389 54 3200
2234 176 28 47 45 24 398 34 3198
2309 157 45 39 43 23 369 54 3409
2487 178 36 43 38 26 401 48 3578
2567 198 29 40 41 20 423 64 3672
2409 169 37 36 39 19 407 56 4100
TOTAL FOR THE WEEK 16136 1137 232 294 278 158 2763 355 24184
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC FOR THE WEEK 2305 162 33 42 40 23 395 51 3455
EQUIVQLENCY FACTOR 0.5 1 1.5 1.5 3 3 3 4.5 0.5
PCU (PASSENGER CAR UNIT) 1153 162 50 63 120 69 1185 230 1728
CVPD (COMMERCIAL VEHICLES PER DAY) 40 23 395 51
14 )
SSIFICATION:
EAGE :
. (IF ANY) :
: STATE : U.P.
SLOW VEHICLES TOTAL

CYCLE HAND HORSE BULLOCK BULLOCK
RICKSHAW CART DRAWN CART CART
VEHICLE (SMALL)
14 15 16 17 18 19
12 12 5 12 24
14 13 8 17 32
13 15 7 23 25
12 11 5 18 27
11 10 7 19 29
9 9 6 25 24
11 11 8 27 22
82 81 46 141 183
12 12 7 20 26 6583
2 3 4 6 8
24 36 28 120 208 5176
509
AXLE LOAD SPECTRUM
Rear Single Axle with single Rear Single Axle with dual Rear Tandem Axle with dual Rear Tridem Axle with du
wheel on either side wheel on either side wheel on either side wheel on either side
No. of Load No. of Load No. of Load No. of Load
Mid- vehicles equivalency Mid- vehicles equivalency Mid- vehicles equivalency Mid- vehicles equivalency
Load Point of factor Load Point of factor Load Point of factor Load Point of factor
Col_3 x Col_8 x Group Col_13 x Group
Group Load Group Load Load Load
Col_4 Col_9 Col_14
(kN) Group (kN) Group (kN) Group (kN) Group
(kN) (kN) (kN) (kN)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
110-120 115 6 10 60 235-245 240 4 81 324 460 - 480 470 2 102 204 590-620 605 1 53
100-110 105 3 7 21 225-235 230 5 68 340 440 - 460 450 3 85 255 560-590 575 2 43
90-100 95 7 5 35 215-225 220 11 57 627 420 - 440 430 9 71 639 530-560 545 2 35
80-90 85 8 3 24 205-215 210 6 47 282 400 - 420 410 5 59 295 500-530 515 5 28
70-80 75 6 2 12 195-205 200 3 39 117 380 - 400 390 7 48 336 470-500 485 5 22
60-70 65 5 1 5 185-195 190 9 32 288 360 - 380 370 3 39 117 440-470 455 6 17
<65 60 2 1 2 175-185 180 1 26 26 340 - 360 350 12 31 372 410-440 425 3 13
165-175 170 0 20 0 320 - 340 330 1 25 25 380-410 395 2 10
155-165 160 3 16 48 300 - 320 310 0 19 0 350-380 365 1 7
145-155 150 2 12 24 280 - 300 290 4 15 60 320-350 335 5 5
135-145 140 13 9 117 260 - 280 270 6 11 66 290-320 305 0 3
125-135 130 1 7 7 240 - 260 250 3 8 24 260-290 275 6 2
115-125 120 2 5 10 220 - 240 230 11 6 66 230-260 245 8 1
105-115 110 2 4 8 200 - 220 210 2 4 8 < 230 215 3 1
95-105 100 3 2 6 180 - 200 190 3 3 9
85-95 90 12 2 24 < 180 170 4 2 8
<85 80 1 1 1
Total 37 159 78 2249 75 2484 49
AD SPECTRUM
Total Total No. Average
Rear Tridem Axle with dual equivalency of VDF
wheel on either side factor vehicles
Col_18 x
Col_19
20 21 22 23
53
86
70
140
110
102
39
20
7
25
0
12
8
3
675 5567 239 23.29

PAVEMENT DESIGN
( BASED ON AXLE LOAD SPECTRUM )
Ref : IRC:37- 2012 TENTATIVE GUIDELINES FOR THE DESIGN OF FLEXIBLE PAV
The design traffic in terms of cumulative no.of standard axles to be carried during the design life o
computed from the following formula.
n
N = 365 [ ( 1 + r ) - 1 ] x A x F
r
Where N = Cumulative number of standard axles to be catered for in the design in terms of
A = Initial traffic ( commercial vehicles per day ) in the year of completion of construc
D = Lane distribution factor
F = Vehicle damage factor ( number of standard axles per commercial vehicle )
n = Design life in years
r = Annual growth rate of commercial traffic
The traffic in the year of completion is estimated using the following formu
x
A = P ( 1 + r )
Where P = Number of commercial vehicles per day at last count
x = Number of years between the last count and the year of completion of co
COMPUTATION OF DESIGN TRAFFIC

Sl. No. Item Nomenclature Figure/N
1 Category of road ( EW / NH / SH / MDR / ODR ) ODR
2 Type of carriageway proposed ( SINGLE / DUAL ) SINGLE
3 No. of proposed lanes/carriageway ( 1 / 1.5 / 2 / 3 / 4 ) 2
4 Type of terrain (PLAIN / ROLLING / HILLY) PLAIN
5 Traffic census ( Total of both direction )
CVPD 412
PCU 12967
No. of years between the last count and the year of
6 x 2
completion of construction
7 Vehicle damage factor (Number of standard axles per
commercial vehicle - Based on Axle Load Spectrum As per F 23.29
Clause 4.4.5 of IRC:37-2012 )
8 Lane distribution factor ( As per Clause 4.5.1 of IRC :37-2012
D 0.50
and Clause 3.4.3 of IRC:SP:72-2015 )
No. of proposed Lane
Type of carriageway proposed lanes/ distribution
carriageway factor
Single 1/1.5 1.00
Single 2 0.50
Single 4 0.40
Dual 2 0.75
Dual 3 0.60
Dual 4 0.45
Annual growth rate of commercial traffic ( As per Clause 4.2.2
9 r 5
of IRC:37-2012 )
10 Design life in years ( As per Clause 4.3.2 of IRC :37-2012 ) n 10
Number of commercial vehicles per day per carriageway at
11 P 412
last count (CVPD/carriageway)
2
Therefore, A = 412 ( 1 + 0.05 )
A = 454 CVPD
And
10
N = 365 [ ( 1 + 0.05 ) - 1 ] x 454 x 0.50
0.05
Thus
N = 24271471 or 24.27 msa
COMPUTATION OF DESIGN CBR
Sl. No. Km Average CBR
1 1 6.28
2 4 6.19
3 7 5.98
4 10 5.45
5 13 5.76
6 16 4.98
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
The 80th Percentile CBR 5.45
DATA FOR LINEAR INTERPOLATION

Crust thickness (mm)
CBR Design Traffic (msa)
BC DBM Granular Base Granular Sub Base Total
20 40 ### 250 300 690

5
30 40 ### 250 300 Err:514
20 40 ### 250 260 640
6
30 40 ### 250 260 Err:514
COMPUTATION OF DESIGN CRUST FOR DESIGN TRAFFIC AND

CBR BY LINEAR INTERPOLATION
5 24.27 40 109 250 300 699

6 24.27 40 96 250 260 646
5.45 24.27 40 103 250 282 675
DESIGN CRUST
Design CBR (%) Design Traffic Crust thickness (mm)
(msa)
Design CBR (%) Design Traffic
(msa) Granular Granular Sub
BC DBM Total
Base Base
5.45 24.27 40 105 250 280 675
CRUST THICKNESS DESIGN CHART
PLATE 1 (CBR 3%)
40 40 40 50
Pavement Thickness in mm
25 40
20 140 155
60 90 120 135
50
225 250 250 250 250 250 250
335 380 380 380 380 380

325
2 5 10 20 30 50 100
Traffic in msa
G Subbase G Base DBM BC/SDBC upto
PLATE 2 (CBR 4%)

40 40
25 40 40 50
20
60 80 110 130 130 140
50
225 250 250 250 250 250 250
265 285 330 330 330 330 330
2 5 10 20 30 50 100
Traffic in msa
PLATE 3 (CBR 5%)

40 40 40 50
25 40
20 120 130
70 100 115
50 55
250 250 250 250 250 250

225
250 300 300 300 300 300

215
2 5 10 20 30 50 100
Traffic in msa
Pavement Thickness in mm PLATE 4 (CBR 6%)
40 40 40 40 50
20 25
65 90 105 110 125
50 50
225 250 250 250 250 250 250
260 260 260 260 260

175 210
2 5 10 20 30 50 100
Traffic in msa
PLATE 5 (CBR 7%)
40 40 50
25 40 40
20 120
50 60 90 110 100
50
250 250 250 250 250 250

225
180 230 230 230 230 230

150
2 5 10 20 30 50 100
Traffic in msa
PLATE 6 (CBR 8%)

40 40 40 40 50
20 25 115
60 85 100 100
50 50
250 250 250 250 250

225 250
200 200 200 200 200

150 150
2 5 10 20 30 50 100
Traffic in msa
PLATE 7 (CBR 9 & 10%)

40 40 40 40 50
20 25
50 80 95 95 110
50 50
250 250 250 250 250
225 250
200 200 200 200 200

150 150
2 5 10 20 30 50 100
Traffic in msa
Pavement Thickness in mm PLATE 8 (CBR 15%)
40 40 50
40 40
20 25 80
40 60 65 65
30 40
250 250 250 250 250

250 250
200 200 200 200 200

100 150
2 5 10 20 30 50 100
Traffic in msa
RESILIENT MODULUS OF VARIOUS LAYER

SUBGRADE SOIL
MR_subgrade = 10 x CBR For CBR=<5
0.64
MR_subgrade = 17.6 x CBR For CBR>5
Design CBR = 5.45 %
Thus, MR_subgrade = 52 Mpa
UNBOUND GRANULAR LAYER (GSB/WMM/WBM)

And 0.45
MR_granular = 0.2 x h x MR_subgrade
Where h = Thickness of layer in mm
Here h = 530 mm
0.45
MR_granular = 0.2 x 530 x 52
= 175 Mpa
EXISTING UNBOUND GRANULAR LAYER (GSB/WMM/WBM)

And 0.45
Here h = 450 mm
0.45
= 163 Mpa
RESILIENT MODULUS AND POISON'S RATIO OF VARIOUS LAYERS
Sl. No. Type of material Resilient modulus Poison's ratio

1 Bituminous Layer with VG-40 3000 0.35
2 Bituminous Layer with VG-30 1700 0.35
3 CRL_Granular Aggregare Layer of 100mm
Granular Base/Sub base 450 0.35
WBM 350 0.35
Natural Gravel 300 0.35
4 Cement Treated Base 5000 0.25
5 Cemen Treated Sub Base 600 0.25
ALLOWABLE LONGITUDINAL AND VERTICAL STRAIN
VARIOUS LAYERS
Allowable strain in micro
Sl. No. Type of material Type of analysis Refere
unit (E-06)
1 Bituminous Layer Fatigue 283.51 Equation
2 Sub Grade Rutting 553.59 Equation
3 Cementitious Layer Fatigue 262.64 Equatio
FATIGUE ANALYSIS
COMPUTATION OF ALLOWABLE HORIZONTAL TENSILE STRAIN AT THE BOTTO
BITUMINOUS LAYER
When Cumulative Standard Axle <30 msa
From Equation 6.1
3.89 0.854
-4 1 1
[ ] [M ]
Nf = 2.21 x 10 x x εt R
Where Nf = Fatigue life in no. of standard axles

εt = Maximum tensile strain at the bottom of bituminous layer and
MR = Relisient modulus of bituminous layer
0.854
-4 1
[ ]
εt = 2.21 x 10 x MR
Nf
0.854
1
= 2.21 x 10
-4
x [ 1700 ]
24270000
-6
= 0.0002835147 Or 283.51 x 10
RUTTING ANALYSIS
COMPUTATION OF ALLOWABLE COMPRESSIVE VERTICAL STRAIN ON SUBGR
From Equation 6.4
4.5337
1
[ ]
-8
N = 4.1656 x 10 x εv
Where N = No. of cumulative standard axles and

εv = Vertical strain in the subgrade
-8 4.5337
εv = [ 4.1656
N
x 10
]
-8 4.5337
=
[ 4.1656 x
24270000
10
]
-6
= 0.0005535943 Or 553.59 x 10
ALLOWABLE LONGITUDINAL AND VERTICAL STRAIN
VARIOUS LAYERS
Sl. No. Type of material Type of analysis Refere
unit (E-06)
1 Bituminous Layer Fatigue 0.00 Equation
2 Sub Grade Rutting ] Equation
3 Cementitious Layer Fatigue 0.00 Equatio
FATIGUE ANALYSIS
COMPUTATION OF ALLOWABLE HORIZONTAL TENSILE STRAIN AT THE BOTTO
BITUMINOUS LAYER
When Cumulative Standard Axle >30 msa
C = 10M
Vb - 0.69
M = 4.84 X
( Va + Vb )
Therefore 0.13 - 0.69
M = 4.84 X ( 0.03 + 0.13 )
M = 0.59
0.59
C = 10
Or C = 3.89
From Equation 6.3 3.89 0.854

-4 1 1
N = 0.5161 C x 10 x [ εt ] x
[ MR ]
0.854
-4 1
εt = 0.5161 x 3.89 x 10 x [ MR ]
N
0.854
= 0.5161 x 3.89 x 10
-4
x [ 1
#NAME? ]
24270000
-6
= #NAME? Or ### x 10
RUTTING ANALYSIS
COMPUTATION OF ALLOWABLE COMPRESSIVE VERTICAL STRAIN ON SUBGR
From Equation 6.5
4.5337
N = 1.41 x 10 x
-8 1
εv [ ]
-8 1/4.5337
εv =
[ 1.4100
N
x 10
]
1/4.5337
[ ]
-8
1.4100 x 10
= #NAME?
-6
= #NAME? Or ### x 10
COMPUTATION OF ALLOWABLE HORIZONTAL TENSILE STRAIN AT
BOTTOM OF CEMENTITIOUS LAYER
FATIGUE ANALYSIS
From Equation 6.6 12
N = RF [ ( 113000 / E
0.8040
εt
+ 191 ) ]
Where RF = Reliability factor for cementitious material for failure against fatigue
= 1 for Expresways, National Highways and other heavy volume road
= 2 for others carrying less than 1500 trucks per day
N = Fatigue life for cementitious material
εt = Tensile strain in cementitious layer in microstrain
Here RF = 2
N = 24.27 msa
E = 450 Mpa
0.8040
Therefore εt = ( 113000 / E + 191 )
1/12
( N / RF )
0.8040
Therefore εt = ( 113000 / 450 + 191 )
1/12
[ 24.27 x 10
6
/ 2 ]
-6
εt = 262.64 microstrain Or 262.64 x 10
DESIGN SERVICE VOLUME

Ref: IRC:64-1990 Guidelines for Capacity of Roads in Rural Area
( Clause
The design service volume that should be6.4considered
of IRC:64-1990 )
for design/improvement of a road fac
be the expected volume at the end of design life.This can be computed by projecting the present volume
appropriate traffic growth rate. n + x
A = P ( 1 + r )
Where
A = Number of passenger car unit (PCU) per day for design
P = Number of PCUs per day at last count
r = Annual growth rate of PCU

Number of years between the last count and the year of completion
x =
construction
Here
P = 12967 PCU As per traffic census carried out in
r = 5 %
x = 2 years
n = 10 years
Therefore
2 + 10
A = 12967 ( 1 + 0.05 )
12
A = 12967 ( 1.05 )
A = 23287 PCU
As per IRC:64-1990, Design Service Volume in Plain Terrain and Low Curvature are as unde
Sl No. Clause No. Terrain Curvature Width of Carriageway (m) Desig

1 8.2 Plain Low Single lane 3.75 Volume2
2 9.1 Plain Low Intermediate lane 5.50 6
3 10.1 Plain Low Double lane 7.00 1
Two lane with paved
4 10.3 Plain Low Fourshoulders
lane divided 10.50 1
5 11.2 Plain Low carriageway with paved
Six lane divided 2x8.75 4
6 11.2 Plain Low shoulders
carriageway with paved 2x12.25 >4
Hence Width of Carriageway required = shoulders
2x8.75 m ie Four lane divided carriageway
shoulders
EMENT DESIGN
AXLE LOAD SPECTRUM )
GUIDELINES FOR THE DESIGN OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS
of standard axles to be carried during the design life of the road is
x D
mber of standard axles to be catered for in the design in terms of msa

ommercial vehicles per day ) in the year of completion of construction
completion is estimated using the following formula.
ars between the last count and the year of completion of construction
ON OF DESIGN TRAFFIC
Figure/No. Unit
ODR
SINGLE
2 No.
PLAIN
412 No.
12967 No.
2 Years
23.29 No.
0.50 No.
5 %
10 Years
412 No.
x 23.29
TION OF DESIGN CBR
Average CBR
6.28
6.19
5.98
5.45
5.76
4.98
5.45
NEAR INTERPOLATION
Type of bitumen
VG-30
VG-30
VG-30
VG-30
RUST FOR DESIGN TRAFFIC AND DESIGN

NEAR INTERPOLATION
Type of bitumen
VG-30
VG-30
VG-30
SIGN CRUST
Type of
bitumen
Type of
bitumen
VG-30
CKNESS DESIGN CHART
ATE 1 (CBR 3%)
50 50
155 170
250 250
380 380
150
Traffic in msa
BC/SDBC upto 5msa
ATE 2 (CBR 4%)

50 50
140 155
250 250
330 330
150
Traffic in msa
BC/SDBC upto 5msa
ATE 3 (CBR 5%)

50 50
130 145
250 250
300 300
150
Traffic in msa
BC/SDBC upto 5msa
ATE 4 (CBR 6%)
50
50
125 140
250 250
260 260
150
Traffic in msa
BC/SDBC upto 5msa
ATE 5 (CBR 7%)
50 50
120 140
250 250
230 230
150
Traffic in msa
BC/SDBC upto 5msa
ATE 6 (CBR 8%)
50
50
115 135
250 250
200 200
150
Traffic in msa
BC/SDBC upto 5msa
E 7 (CBR 9 & 10%)
50
50
125
110
250 250
200 200
150
Traffic in msa
BC/SDBC upto 5msa
ATE 8 (CBR 15%)
50 50
80 100
250 250
200 200
150
Traffic in msa
BC/SDBC upto 5msa
ULUS OF VARIOUS LAYER

UBGRADE SOIL
LAR LAYER (GSB/WMM/WBM)
RANULAR LAYER (GSB/WMM/WBM)

D POISON'S RATIO OF VARIOUS LAYERS
Reference
Cl. 7.4.2
Cl. 7.4.2
ANNEX-VIII
ANNEX-VIII
ANNEX-VIII
Table X-2
Table X-2
DINAL AND VERTICAL STRAIN IN
IOUS LAYERS
Reference
Equation 6.1/6.3
Equation 6.4/6.5
Equation 6.6
IGUE ANALYSIS
ORIZONTAL TENSILE STRAIN AT THE BOTTOM OF
UMINOUS LAYER
ative Standard Axle <30 msa
TTING ANALYSIS
OMPRESSIVE VERTICAL STRAIN ON SUBGRADE
ative Standard Axle <30 msa
DINAL AND VERTICAL STRAIN IN
IOUS LAYERS
Reference
Equation 6.1/6.3
Equation 6.4/6.5
Equation 6.6
IGUE ANALYSIS
ORIZONTAL TENSILE STRAIN AT THE BOTTOM OF
UMINOUS LAYER
ative Standard Axle >30 msa
TTING ANALYSIS
OMPRESSIVE VERTICAL STRAIN ON SUBGRADE
ative Standard Axle >30 msa
LE HORIZONTAL TENSILE STRAIN AT THE
F CEMENTITIOUS LAYER
UE ANALYSIS
ctor for cementitious material for failure against fatigue

ways, National Highways and other heavy volume roads
SERVICE VOLUME
es for Capacity of Roads in Rural Areas
se 6.4considered
ld be of IRC:64-1990 )
for design/improvement of a road facility, should
This can be computed by projecting the present volume at an
ears between the last count and the year of completion of
6/2015
Volume in Plain Terrain and Low Curvature are as under.
Design Service
Volume2000
in PCU per
6000
15000
17250
40000
>40000
Four lane divided carriageway with paved
shoulders
PAVEMENT DESIGN
Ref : IRC:37- 2012 TENTATIVE GUIDELINES FOR THE DESIGN OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMEN
Clause 10.1 : Pavement Combination no. - 1
Granular Base and Granular Sub base
No. of layers - 5 No. of critical locations for tensile strain - 3
Sl. No. Item Nomenclature Figure/No.
1 Category of road ( EW / NH / SH / MDR / ODR / VR ) ODR
CVPD (CITY ROAD) NA
PCU (CITY ROAD) NA
5 Design traffic ( As per Clause 10 (a) of IRC:37-2012 ) N 2.00

1 3 5.51
2 5.53
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

CBR Design Traffic (msa) Type of
5 2.00 20 ### 225 215 510 VG

6 2.00 20 ### 225 175 470 VG
COMPUTATION OF DESIGN CRUST FOR DESIGN TRAFFIC AND DES

5.51 2.00 20 50 225 195 490 VG
DESIGN CRUST
(msa) Typ
Granular Granular Sub bitum
BC DBM Total
Base Base
5.51 2.00 25 50 225 195 495 VG
PLATE 1 (CBR 3%)
40 40 40 50
20 25 40
120 140 135 155
60 90
50
225 250 250 250 250 250 250
325 335 380 380 380 380 380
2 5 10 20 30 50 100
Traffic in msa
G Subbase G Base DBM BC
PLATE 2 (CBR 4%)

25 40 40 40 40 50
20
60 80 110 130 130 140
50
250 250 250 250 250 250

225
285 330 330 330 330 330

265
2 5 10 20 30 50 100
Traffic in msa
PLATE 3 (CBR 5%)

40 40 40 50
25 40
20 120 130
70 100 115
50 55
225 250 250 250 250 250 250
215 250 300 300 300 300 300
2 5 10 20 30 50 100
Traffic in msa
PLATE 4 (CBR 6%)

hickness in mm
40 40 40 40 50
20 25
65 90 105 110 125
50 50
250 250
250 250 250 250 250
Pavement Th
225 250
210 260 260 260 260 260

175
2 5 10 20 30 50 100
Traffic in msa
PLATE 5 (CBR 7%)
40 40 40 40 50
20 25
50 90 110 100 120
50 60
250 250 250 250 250 250

225
150 180 230 230 230 230 230
2 5 10 20 30 50 100
Traffic in msa
PLATE 6 (CBR 8%)

40 40 50
40 40
20 25 115
60 85 100 100
50 50
250 250 250 250 250

225 250
150 150 200 200 200 200 200
2 5 10 20 30 50 100
Traffic in msa
PLATE 7 (CBR 9 & 10%)

40 40 50
40 40
20 25 110
50 80 95 95
50 50
250 250 250 250 250

225 250
150 150 200 200 200 200 200
2 5 10 20 30 50 100
Traffic in msa
PLATE 8 (CBR 15%)

nt Thickness in mm
40 40 40 40 50
20 25
60 65 65 80
30 40 40
250 250 250 250 250

250 250
250 250 250 250 250
250 250
Pavement 100 150 200 200 200 200 200
2 5 10 20 30 50 100
Traffic in msa
RESILIENT MODULUS OF SUBGRADE SOIL
0.64
Design CBR = 5.51 %
Thus, MR_subgrade = 52.46 MPa
RESILIENT MODULUS OF UNBOUND DESIGN GRANULAR LAYER (GSB/WMM/WBM

0.45
Here h = 420 mm
0.45
MR_granular = 0.2 x 420 x 52.46
= 158.97 MPa
RESILIENT MODULUS OF EXISTING UNBOUND GRANULAR LAYER (GSB/WMM/WBM

0.45
Here h = 260 mm
0.45
MR_granular = 0.2 x 260 x 52.46
= 128.11 MPa
Sl. No. Type of material Resilient modulus (Mpa) Poison's ratio Refer
1 Bituminous Layers
DBM & BC with VG-10 1000 0.35
DBM & BC with VG-30 1700 0.35
DBM & BC with VG-40 3000 0.35
DBM & BC with Modified Bitumen 1650 0.35
Cl. 7
WMM/RAP treated with 3% bitumen emulsion/foamed
600 0.35
bitumen & 1% cement
BM with VG-10 500 0.35
BM with VG-30 700 0.35
Bituminous layer (Thick layer without much cracking) 750 - 1700 0.35
Bituminous Layer in distressed condition 400 - 1500 0.35
Bituminous Layer with BM in distressed condition 500 0.35
Granular Base/Sub base 450 0.35 ANNE
WBM 350 0.35 ANNE
Natural Gravel 300 0.35 ANNE
3 Cement Treated Base 5000 0.25 Table
4 Cemen Treated Sub Base 600 0.25 Table
CALCULATION OF THICKNESS OF BITUMINOUS LAYER BASED ON WEIGH
RESILIENT MODULUS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED MODULES
BITUMINOUS
LAYER
LAYER
75 mm
BITUMINOUS WMM
LAYER 200 mm 225 mm
WBM 260 mm
GSB 195 mm
EXISTING MODULE PROPOSED MODULE
COMPUTATION OF BITUMINOUS OVERLAY OVER EXISTING

BITUMINOUS SURFACE
1 MR of distressed bituminous layer 500
2 MR of proposed bituminous layer 1700
3 MR of existing granular layer 128.11
4 MR of proposed granular layer 158.97
Therefore, Thickness of proposed bituminous layer h over existing bituminous surface
h = ( 7.5 x 1700 ) + ( 42 x 158.97 ) - ( 26 x 128.11 + 20.00 x

1700
Thus,
h = 3.59 cm Say 35 mm
ALLOWABLE LONGITUDINAL AND VERTICAL STRAIN IN VARIOU
LAYERS
Sl. No. Type of material Type of analysis Reference
unit (E-06)
1 Bituminous Layer Fatigue 538.58 Equation 6.1/6.
2 Sub Grade Rutting 960.06 Equation 6.4/6.
FATIGUE ANALYSIS
COMPUTATION OF ALLOWABLE HORIZONTAL TENSILE STRAIN AT THE BOTTOM OF
BITUMINOUS LAYER
From Equation 6.1

3.89 0.854
-4 1 1
[ ] [ ]
Nf = 2.21 x 10 x εt x MR
0.854
-4 1
[ ]
εt = 2.21 x 10 x MR
Nf
0.854
1
= 2.21 x 10
-4
x [ 1700 ]
2000000
-6
= 0.0005385786 Or 538.58 x 10
RUTTING ANALYSIS
COMPUTATION OF ALLOWABLE COMPRESSIVE VERTICAL STRAIN ON SUBGRADE

From Equation 6.4
4.5337
N = 4.1656 x 10
-8
x
[ 1
εv ]
-8 4.5337
4.1656 x 10
εv = [ N ]
-8 4.5337
=
[ 4.1656 x
2000000
10
]
-6
= 0.0009600607 Or 960.06 x 10
Ref: IRC:64-1990 Guidelines for Capacity of Roads in Rural Areas
( Clause
of IRC:64-1990 )
for design/improvement of a road facility, sh
be the expected volume at the end of design life.This can be computed by projecting the present volume at an
A = P ( 1 + r )
Where

Number of years between the last count and the year of completion of
x =
construction

Here
P = NA PCU As per traffic census carried out in -----/2
r = #REF! %
x = #REF! years
n = #REF! years
Therefore
### + #REF!
A = NA ( 1 + #REF! )
#REF!
A = NA ( #REF! )
A = #REF! PCU
As per IRC:64-1990, Design Service Volume in Plain Terrain and Low Curvature are as under.
Sl No. Clause No. Terrain Curvature Width of Carriageway (m) Design Serv
in PC
Two lane with paved
#REF! m ie #REF!
NT DESIGN
ELINES FOR THE DESIGN OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS
ment Combination no. - 1
nd Granular Sub base
o. of critical locations for tensile strain - 3
OF DESIGN TRAFFIC
Unit
No.
No.
No.
msa
N OF DESIGN CBR
Average CBR
5.51
5.53
5.51
AR INTERPOLATION
Type of bitumen
VG-30
VG-30
T FOR DESIGN TRAFFIC AND DESIGN

R INTERPOLATION
Type of bitumen
VG-30
N CRUST
Type of
bitumen
VG-30
ESS DESIGN CHART
1 (CBR 3%)
50
170
250
380
150
Traffic in msa
2 (CBR 4%)
50
155
250
330
150
Traffic in msa
3 (CBR 5%)
50
145
250
300
150
Traffic in msa
4 (CBR 6%)
50
140
250
260
150
Traffic in msa
5 (CBR 7%)
50
140
250
230
150
Traffic in msa
6 (CBR 8%)
50
135
250
200
150
Traffic in msa
CBR 9 & 10%)
50
125
250
200
150
Traffic in msa
8 (CBR 15%)
50
100
250
250
200
150
Traffic in msa
US OF SUBGRADE SOIL
ESIGN GRANULAR LAYER (GSB/WMM/WBM)
OUND GRANULAR LAYER (GSB/WMM/WBM)
SON'S RATIO OF VARIOUS LAYERS
Reference
Cl. 7.4.2
ANNEX-VIII
ANNEX-VIII
ANNEX-VIII
Table X-2
Table X-2
TUMINOUS LAYER BASED ON WEIGHTED
STING AND PROPOSED MODULES
OUS OVERLAY OVER EXISTING

US SURFACE
Unit
MPa
Mpa
MPa
MPa
500 )
ND VERTICAL STRAIN IN VARIOUS
AYERS
Reference
Equation 6.1/6.3
Equation 6.4/6.5
E ANALYSIS
ONTAL TENSILE STRAIN AT THE BOTTOM OF
NOUS LAYER
Standard Axle <30 msa
G ANALYSIS
RESSIVE VERTICAL STRAIN ON SUBGRADE

RVICE VOLUME
or Capacity of Roads in Rural Areas
of IRC:64-1990
considered )
an be computed by projecting the present volume at an
etween the last count and the year of completion of
-----/2016
e in Plain Terrain and Low Curvature are as under.
Design Service
Volume2000
in PCU per
6000
15000
17250
40000
>40000
#REF!
PAVEMENT DESIGN
Ref : IRC:37- 2012 TENTATIVE GUIDELINES FOR THE DESIGN OF FLEXIBLE PAVEME
Granular Base and Granular Sub base
The design traffic in terms of cumulative no.of standard axles to be carried during the design life of th
n
N = 365 [ ( 1 + r ) - 1 ] x A x F x
r
Where N = Cumulative number of standard axles to be catered for in the design in terms of msa
A = Initial traffic ( commercial vehicles per day ) in the year of completion of construction
The traffic in the year of completion is estimated using the following formula.
x
A = P ( 1 + r )
x = Number of years between the last count and the year of completion of constr

2 Type of carriageway proposed ( SINGLE / DUAL ) single
3 No. of proposed lanes/carriageway ( 1 / 1.5 / 2 / 3 / 4 ) 1.5
CVPD 160
PCU 3898
6 x 1
D 1.00
carriageway factor
Single 1/1.5 1.00
Single 2 0.50
Single 4 0.40
Dual 2 0.75
Dual 3 0.60
Dual 4 0.45
8 r 5
of IRC:37-2012 )
F 3.5
commercial vehicle - As per Clause 4.4.6 of IRC:37-2012 )
10
No. of proposed
Initial Traffic Volume in CVPD
lanes/carriageway
Plain/Rolling Hilly
0-150 1.5 0.50
150-1500 3.5 1.50
>1500 4.5 2.50
11 P 160
1
Therefore, A = 160 ( 1 + 0.05 )
A = 168 CVPD
And
10
N = 365 [ ( 1 + 0.05 ) - 1 ] x 168 x 1.00 x
0.05
Thus
N = 2699467 or 2.70 msa
1 5.00
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

CBR Design Traffic (msa) Type
2 20 ### 225 215 510 V

5
5 25 ### 250 250 580 V
2 20 ### 225 175 470 V
6
5 25 ### 250 210 535 V
COMPUTATION OF DESIGN CRUST FOR DESIGN TRAFFIC AND DE

CBR Design Traffic (msa) Type
5 2.70 21 51 231 223 526 V

6 2.70 21 50 231 183 485 V
5.00 2.70 21 51 231 223 526 V
DESIGN CRUST
(msa) Ty
bi
(msa) Ty
Granular Granular Sub bi
BC DBM Total
Base Base
5.00 2.70 25 50 230 225 530 V
PLATE 1 (CBR 3%)
40 40 40 50
25 40
20 140 155
60 90 120 135
50
250 250 250 250 250 250

225
335 380 380 380 380 380

325
2 5 10 20 30 50 100
Traffic in msa
PLATE 2 (CBR 4%)

25 40 40 40 40 50
20
60 80 110 130 130 140
50
225 250 250 250 250 250 250
265 285 330 330 330 330 330
2 5 10 20 30 50 100
Traffic in msa
PLATE 3 (CBR 5%)

40 40 40 50
20 25 40
120 130
55 70 100 115
50
250 250 250 250 250 250

225
250 300 300 300 300 300

215
2 5 10 20 30 50 100
Traffic in msa
PLATE 4 (CBR 6%)

40 40 40 40 50
ss in mm
20 25
40 40 40 40 50
20 25
65 90 105 110 125
50 50
225 250 250 250 250 250 250
260 260 260 260 260

175 210
2 5 10 20 30 50 100
Traffic in msa
PLATE 5 (CBR 7%)
40 40 50
25 40 40
20 120
50 60 90 110 100
50
250 250 250 250 250 250
225
150 180 230 230 230 230 230
2 5 10 20 30 50 100
Traffic in msa
PLATE 6 (CBR 8%)

40 50
40 40 40
20 25
85 100 100 115

60
50 50
250 250 250 250 250

225 250
150 150 200 200 200 200 200
2 5 10 20 30 50 100
Traffic in msa
PLATE 7 (CBR 9 & 10%)

40 40 50
40 40
20 25
80 95 95 110
50 50 50
250 250 250 250 250

225 250
150 150 200 200 200 200 200
2 5 10 20 30 50 100
Traffic in msa
PLATE 40
8 (CBR 15%) 40 50
40 40 40
20 25 80
60 65
kness in mm
40 65
30 40
250 250 250 250 250

60 65
40 65
30 40
250 250 250 250 250
250 250
100 150 200 200 200 200 200
2 5 10 20 30 50 100
Traffic in msa
RESILIENT MODULUS OF VARIOUS LAYERS
SUBGRADE SOIL
0.64
Design CBR = 5.00 %
UNBOUND DESIGN GRANULAR LAYER (GSB/WMM/WBM)

0.45
Here h = 455 mm
0.45
= 157.07 MPa

0.45
Here h = 250 mm
0.45
= 119.97 MPa
Sl. No. Type of material Resilient modulus (Mpa) Poison's ratio Re

1 Bituminous Layers
DBM & BC with VG-10 1000 0.35
DBM & BC with VG-30 1700 0.35
DBM & BC with VG-40 3000 0.35
C
600 0.35
bitumen & 1% cement
C
BM with VG-10 500 0.35

BM with VG-30 700 0.35
Granular Base/Sub base 450 0.35 ANN
WBM 350 0.35 ANN
Natural Gravel 300 0.35 ANN
3 Cement Treated Base 5000 0.25 Ta
4 Cement Treated Sub Base 600 0.25 Ta
CALCULATION OF THICKNESS OF BITUMINOUS LAYER BASED ON WEIG
BITUMINOUS
LAYER
75 mm
BITUMINOUS
BITUMINOUS WMM
LAYER
LAYER
260 mm 230 mm
WBM
GSB
420 mm
223 mm

BITUMINOUS SURFACE
h = ( 7.5 x 3000 ) + ( 45 x 157.07 ) - ( 42 x 119.97 + 26.00 x

3000
Thus,
h = 3.86 cm Say 40 mm
ALLOWABLE LONGITUDINAL AND VERTICAL STRAIN IN VARIO
LAYERS
unit (E-06)
1 Bituminous Layer Fatigue 498.59 Equation 6.1
2 Sub Grade Rutting 898.57 Equation 6.4
FATIGUE ANALYSIS
COMPUTATION OF ALLOWABLE HORIZONTAL TENSILE STRAIN AT THE BOTTOM
BITUMINOUS LAYER
From Equation 6.1

3.89 0.854
-4 1 1
[ ] [ ]
Nf = 2.21 x 10 x εt x MR
0.854
-4 1
[ ]
εt = 2.21 x 10 x MR
Nf
0.854
1
= 2.21 x 10
-4
x [ 1700 ]
2700000
-6
= 0.0004985908 Or 498.59 x 10
RUTTING ANALYSIS
COMPUTATION OF ALLOWABLE COMPRESSIVE VERTICAL STRAIN ON SUBGRAD

From Equation 6.4
4.5337
N = 4.1656 x 10
-8
x
[ 1
εv ]
-8 4.5337
4.1656 x 10
εv = [ N ]
-8 4.5337
=
[ 4.1656
2700000
x 10
]
-6
= 0.0008985679 Or 898.57 x 10
ALLOWABLE LONGITUDINAL AND VERTICAL STRAIN IN VARIO
LAYERS
unit (E-06)
1 Bituminous Layer Fatigue #NAME? Equation 6.1
2 Sub Grade Rutting #NAME? Equation 6.4
FATIGUE ANALYSIS
BITUMINOUS LAYER

C = 10M
Vb - 0.69
M = 4.84 X
( Va + Vb )
M = 4.84 X ( 0.03 + 0.13 )
M = 0.59
0.59
C = 10
Or C = 3.89

-4 1 1
N = 0.5161 C x 10 x [ εt ] x
[ MR ]
0.854
-4 1
εt = 0.5161 x 3.89 x 10 x [ MR ]
N
0.854
x [ ]
-4 1
= 0.5161 x 3.89 x 10 #NAME?
2700000
-6
= #NAME? Or ### x 10
RUTTING ANALYSIS
COMPUTATION OF ALLOWABLE COMPRESSIVE VERTICAL STRAIN ON SUBGRAD

From Equation 6.5
4.5337
-8 1
N = 1.41 x 10 x [ εv ]
-8 1/4.5337
εv = 1.4100 x 10
[ N ]
1/4.5337
[ ]
-8
1.4100 x 10
= #NAME?
-6
= #NAME? Or ### x 10
( Clause
of IRC:64-1990 )
for design/improvement of a road facility,
be the expected volume at the end of design life.This can be computed by projecting the present volume at
A = P ( 1 + r )
Where

x =
construction

Here
P = 3898 PCU As per traffic census carried out in ---
r = 5 %
x = 1 years
n = 10 years
Therefore
1 + 10
A = 3898 ( 1 + 0.05 )
11
A = 3898 ( 1.05 )
A = 6667 PCU
Sl No. Clause No. Terrain Curvature Width of Carriageway (m) Design S

in P
Two lane with paved
7.00 m ie Double lane
ENT DESIGN
DELINES FOR THE DESIGN OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS
ement Combination no. - 1
and Granular Sub base
No. of critical locations for tensile strain - 3
andard axles to be carried during the design life of the road is
of standard axles to be catered for in the design in terms of msa

ercial vehicles per day ) in the year of completion of construction
between the last count and the year of completion of construction

OF DESIGN TRAFFIC
Unit
No.
No.
No.
Years
No.
%
Years
No.
No.
3.5
ON OF DESIGN CBR
Average CBR
5.00
5.00
EAR INTERPOLATION
Type of bitumen
VG-30
VG-30
VG-30
VG-30
ST FOR DESIGN TRAFFIC AND DESIGN

AR INTERPOLATION
Type of bitumen
VG-30
VG-30
VG-30
GN CRUST
Type of
bitumen
VG-30
NESS DESIGN CHART
E 1 (CBR 3%)
50
170
250
380
150
Traffic in msa
E 2 (CBR 4%)
50
155
250
330
150
Traffic in msa
E 3 (CBR 5%) 50
145
250
300
150
Traffic in msa
E 4 (CBR 6%)
50
140
50
140
250
260
150
Traffic in msa
E 5 (CBR 7%)
50
140
250
230
150
Traffic in msa
E 6 (CBR 8%) 50
135
250
200
150
Traffic in msa
7 (CBR 9 & 10%) 50

125
250
200
150
Traffic in msa
E 8 (CBR 15%) 50
100
250
250
200
150
Traffic in msa
US OF VARIOUS LAYERS
GRADE SOIL
NULAR LAYER (GSB/WMM/WBM)
ANULAR LAYER (GSB/WMM/WBM)
OISON'S RATIO OF VARIOUS LAYERS
Reference
Cl. 7.4.2
Cl. 7.4.2
ANNEX-VIII
ANNEX-VIII
ANNEX-VIII
Table X-2
Table X-2
BITUMINOUS LAYER BASED ON WEIGHTED
XISTING AND PROPOSED MODULES
NOUS OVERLAY OVER EXISTING

OUS SURFACE
Unit
MPa
Mpa
MPa
MPa
500 )
AND VERTICAL STRAIN IN VARIOUS
LAYERS
Reference
Equation 6.1/6.3
Equation 6.4/6.5
UE ANALYSIS
ZONTAL TENSILE STRAIN AT THE BOTTOM OF
MINOUS LAYER
e Standard Axle <30 msa
NG ANALYSIS
PRESSIVE VERTICAL STRAIN ON SUBGRADE
e Standard Axle <30 msa

AND VERTICAL STRAIN IN VARIOUS
LAYERS
Reference
Equation 6.1/6.3
Equation 6.4/6.5
UE ANALYSIS
ZONTAL TENSILE STRAIN AT THE BOTTOM OF
MINOUS LAYER
e Standard Axle >30 msa
NG ANALYSIS
PRESSIVE VERTICAL STRAIN ON SUBGRADE
e Standard Axle >30 msa

ERVICE VOLUME
for Capacity of Roads in Rural Areas
6.4considered
be of IRC:64-1990 )
can be computed by projecting the present volume at an
s between the last count and the year of completion of
-----/2016
ume in Plain Terrain and Low Curvature are as under.
Design Service
Volume2000
in PCU per
6000
15000
17250
40000
>40000
Double lane
S
PAVEMENT DESIGN
Cemented Base and Cemented Sub base with Crack Relief Interlayer of Aggregate
The design traffic in terms of cumulative no.of standard axles to be carried during the design life of the
n
N = 365 [ ( 1 + r ) - 1 ] x A x F x
r
x
A = P ( 1 + r )
x = Number of years between the last count and the year of completion of construct

2 Type of carriageway proposed ( SINGLE / DUAL ) DUAL
CVPD 3056
PCU 25429
6 x 2
D 0.75
carriageway factor
Single 1/1.5 1.00
Single 2 0.50
Single 4 0.40
Dual 2 0.75
Dual 3 0.60
Dual 4 0.45
8 r 5
of IRC:37-2012 )
F 4.5
No. of proposed
lanes/carriageway
Plain/Rolling Hilly
0-150 1.5 0.50
150-1500 3.5 1.50
>1500 4.5 2.50
11 P 1528
2
Therefore, A = 1528 ( 1 + 0.05 )
A = 1685 CVPD
And
10
N = 365 [ ( 1 + 0.05 ) - 1 ] x 1685 x 0.75 x
0.05
Thus
N = 26108049 or 26.11 msa
1 5.98
2 6.02
3 6.10
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

BC/SDBC DBM Granular Base Granular Sub Base Total
20 90 250 260 640 VG
6
30 40 105 250 260 655 VG
20 40 90 250 230 610 VG
7
30 40 105 250 230 625 VG

BC/SDBC DBM Granular Base Granular Sub Base Total
6 26.11 40 99 250 260 649 VG
7 26.11 40 99 250 230 619 VG
6.00 26.11 40 99 250 260 649 VG
DESIGN CRUST
Crust thickness (mm) Typ
(msa)
Granular Granular Sub bitu
BC DBM Total
Base Base
6.00 26.11 40 100 250 260 650 VG
PLATE 21 (CBR 3%)
50 50 50 50
40 40
30 50 50
100 100 100 100
100 100
100
210 230 240 240 250
210 220
250 250 250 250 250 250 250
2 5 10 20 30 50 100
Traffic in msa
CT Sub base CT Base CRIA DBM
PLATE 22 (CBR 5%)

50 50
30 40 50 50
30 50 50
100 100 100 100
100 100 100
190 210 210 220 230

190 200
250 250 250 250 250 250 250
2 5 10 20 30 50 100
Traffic in msa
PLATE 23 (CBR 10%)

50 50
30 40 50 50
30 50 50
100 100 100 100
100 100
100
170 190 190 200 210 170 180
250 250 250 250 250 250 250
2 5 10 20 30 50 100
Traffic in msa
PLATE 24 (CBR 15%)

ickness in mm
50 50 50
30 40 50
30 50 50
100 100 100 100
100 100
100
Pavement Th
140 160 170 180 190 150 160
250 250 250 250 250 250 250
2 5 10 20 30 50 100
Traffic in msa
RESILIENT MODULUS OF UNBOUND DESIGN GRANULAR LAYER (GSB/WMM/WBM
0.45
Here h = ### mm
0.45
MR_granular = 0.2 x 510 x 55.4
= #### MPa
RESILIENT MODULUS OF EXISTING UNBOUND GRANULAR LAYER (GSB/WMM/WBM

0.45
Here h = 260 mm
0.45
= #### MPa
1 Bituminous Layers
DBM & BC with VG-10 1000 0.35
DBM & BC with VG-30 1700 0.35
DBM & BC with VG-40 3000 0.35
Cl. 7
600 0.35
bitumen & 1% cement
BM with VG-10 500 0.35
BM with VG-30 700 0.35
WBM 350 0.35 ANNE
CALCULATION OF THICKNESS OF BITUMINOUS LAYER BASED ON WEIGH
140 mm
200 mm 250 mm
260 mm
260 mm

Sl. No. BITUMINOUS
Item SURFACE Nomenclature Figure/No.
h = ( 14 x 1700 ) + ( 51 x 183.21 ) - ( 26 x 135.29 + 20.00 x

1700
Thus,
h = 11.54 cm Say 115 mm
ALLOWABLE LONGITUDINAL AND VERTICAL STRAIN IN VARIOUS LAYER

unit (E-06)
3 Cementitious Layer Fatigue 246.39 Equation 6.6
FATIGUE ANALYSIS
BITUMINOUS LAYER
From Equation 6.1

3.89 0.854
-4 1 1
[ ] [ ]
Nf = 2.21 x 10 x εt x MR
0.854
-4 1
[ ]
εt = 2.21 x 10 x MR
Nf
0.854
1
= 2.21 x 10
-4
x [ 1700 ]
26110000
-6
= 0.00027824 Or 278.24 x 10
RUTTING ANALYSIS

From Equation 6.4
4.5337
N = 4.1656 x 10
-8
x
[ 1
εv ]
-8 4.5337
#### x 10
εv = [ N ]
-8 4.5337
=
[ ####
26110000
x 10
]
-6
= 0.00054474 Or 544.74 x 10
FATIGUE ANALYSIS
BITUMINOUS LAYER
C = 10M
Vb - 0.69
M = 4.84 X
( Va + Vb )
M = 4.84 X ( 0.03 + 0.13 )
M = 0.59
0.59
C = 10
Or C = 3.89

-4 1 1
N = 0.5161 C x 10 x [ εt ] x
[ MR ]
0.854
-4 1
εt = 0.5161 x 3.89 x 10 x [ MR ]
N
0.854
= 0.5161 x 3.89 x 10
-4
x [ 1
#NAME? ]
26110000
-6
= #NAME? Or ### x 10
RUTTING ANALYSIS

From Equation 6.5
4.5337
-8 1
N = 1.41 x 10 x [ εv ]
-8 1/4.5337
εv =
[ ]
#### x 10
N
1/4.5337
[ ]
-8
#### x 10
= #NAME?
-6
= #NAME? Or ### x 10
COMPUTATION OF ALLOWABLE HORIZONTAL TENSILE STRAIN AT THE
BOTTOM OF CEMENTITIOUS BASE LAYER
FATIGUE ANALYSIS
N = RF [ ( 113000 / E
0.8040
+ 191 ) ]
εt
= 1 for Expresways, National Highways and other heavy volume roads
Here RF = 1
N = 26.11 msa
E = 450 MPa
0.8040
Therefore εt = ( 113000 / E + 191 )
1/12
( N / RF )
0.8040
Therefore εt = ( 113000 / 450 + 191 )

1/12
[ 26.11 x 10
6
/ 1 ]
-6
The design service volume that( Clause 6.4considered
should be of IRC:64-1990 )
A = P ( 1 + r )
Where

x =
construction

Here
P = 25429 PCU As per traffic census carried out in -----/2
r = 5 %
x = 2 years
n = 10 years
Therefore
2 + 10
A = 25429 ( 1 + 0.05 )
12
A = 25429 ( 1.05 )
A = 45667 PCU
in PC
Two lane with paved

4 10.3 Plain Low 10.50 17250
shoulders
Four lane divided

5 11.2 Plain Low carriageway with paved 2x8.75 40000
shoulders
Six lane divided carriageway
6 11.2 Plain Low 2x12.25 >40000
with paved shoulders
Hence Width of Carriageway required = 0.00 m ie 0
NT DESIGN
se with Crack Relief Interlayer of Aggregate
o. of critical locations for tensile strain - 5
ndard axles to be carried during the design life of the road is
standard axles to be catered for in the design in terms of msa

ial vehicles per day ) in the year of completion of construction
letion is estimated using the following formula.
ween the last count and the year of completion of construction

OF DESIGN TRAFFIC
Unit
No.
No.
No.
Years
No.
%
Years
No.
No.
4.5
N OF DESIGN CBR
Average CBR
5.98
6.02
6.10
6.00
AR INTERPOLATION
Type of bitumen
VG-30
VG-30
VG-30
VG-30

R INTERPOLATION
Type of bitumen
VG-30
VG-30
VG-30
N CRUST
Type of
bitumen
VG-30
ESS DESIGN CHART
21 (CBR 3%)
50
50
100
230
250
150
Traffic in msa
BC
22 (CBR 5%)
50
50
100
210
250
150
Traffic in msa
BC
3 (CBR 10%)
50
50
100
190
250
150
Traffic in msa
BC
4 (CBR 15%)
50
50
100
170
250
150
Traffic in msa
BC
SIGN GRANULAR LAYER (GSB/WMM/WBM)
OUND GRANULAR LAYER (GSB/WMM/WBM)
Reference
Cl. 7.4.2
ANNEX-VIII
ANNEX-VIII
ANNEX-VIII
Table X-2
Table X-2
TUMINOUS LAYER BASED ON WEIGHTED
STING AND PROPOSED MODULES
OUS OVERLAY OVER EXISTING

US SURFACE Unit
MPa
Mpa
MPa
MPa
500 )
VERTICAL STRAIN IN VARIOUS LAYERS

Reference
Equation 6.1/6.3
Equation 6.4/6.5
Equation 6.6
E ANALYSIS
NOUS LAYER
G ANALYSIS

E ANALYSIS
NOUS LAYER
Standard Axle >30 msa
G ANALYSIS

HORIZONTAL TENSILE STRAIN AT THE
NTITIOUS BASE LAYER
r cementitious material for failure against fatigue

National Highways and other heavy volume roads
RVICE VOLUME
of IRC:64-1990
considered )
n be computed by projecting the present volume at an
-----/2016
Design Service
Volume2000
in PCU per
6000
15000
17250
40000
>40000
0
PAVEMENT DESIGN
Ref : IRC:37- 2012 TENTATIVE GUIDELINES FOR THE DESIGN OF FLEXIBLE PAVE
Cemented Base and Cemented Sub base with SAMI at the interface of Cemented B
the Bituminous Layer
No. of layers - 5 No. of critical locations for tensile strain -
The design traffic in terms of cumulative no.of standard axles to be carried during the design life of
n
N = 365 [ ( 1 + r ) - 1 ] x A x
r
Where N = Cumulative number of standard axles to be catered for in the design in terms of m
A = Initial traffic ( commercial vehicles per day ) in the year of completion of constructio
The traffic in the year of completion is estimated using the following formula
x
A = P ( 1 + r )
x = Number of years between the last count and the year of completion of cons

Sl. No. Item Nomenclature
1 Category of road ( EW / NH / SH / MDR / ODR / VR )
2 Type of carriageway proposed ( SINGLE / DUAL )
3 No. of proposed lanes/carriageway ( 1 / 1.5 / 2 / 3 / 4 )
4 Type of terrain (PLAIN / ROLLING / HILLY)
CVPD
PCU
6 x
D
carriageway factor
Single 1/1.5 1.00
Single 2 0.50
Single 4 0.40
Dual 2 0.75
Dual 3 0.60
Dual 4 0.45
8 r
of IRC:37-2012 )
9 Design life in years ( As per Clause 4.3.2 of IRC :37-2012 ) n
F
No. of proposed
lanes/carriageway
Plain/Rolling Hilly
0-150 1.5 0.50
150-1500 3.5 1.50
>1500 4.5 2.50
11 P
2
Therefore, A = 1528 ( 1 + 0.05 )
A = 1685 CVPD
And
10
N = 365 [ ( 1 + 0.05 ) - 1 ] x 1685 x
0.05
Thus
N = 26108049 or 26.11 msa
1 5.98
2 6.02
3 6.10
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

BC/SDBC DBM Granular Base Granular Sub Base
20 40 90 250 260
6
30 40 105 250 260
20 40 90 250 230
7
30 40 105 250 230
COMPUTATION OF DESIGN CRUST FOR DESIGN TRAFFIC AND D

6 26.11 40 99 250 260

7 26.11 40 99 250 230
6.00 26.11 40 99 250 260
DESIGN CRUST
BC DBM
Base Base
6.00 26.11 40 100 250 260
PLATE 1 (CBR 3%)
2 5 10 20 30 50
Traffic in msa
G Subbase G Base DBM BC/SDBC upto 5
PLATE 2 (CBR 4%)

2 5 10 20 30 50
Traffic in msa
PLATE 3 (CBR 5%)

2 5 10 20 30 50
Traffic in msa
PLATE 4 (CBR 6%)

Pavement Thic
2 5 10 20 30 50
Traffic in msa
PLATE 5 (CBR 7%)

2 5 10 20 30 50
Traffic in msa
PLATE 6 (CBR 8%)

Pavement Thickne
2 5 10 20 30 50
Traffic in msa
PLATE 7 (CBR 9 & 10%)

2 5 10 20 30 50
Traffic in msa
PLATE 8 (CBR 15%)

2 5 10 20 30 50
Traffic in msa

0.64
Design CBR = 6.00 %
RESILIENT MODULUS OF UNBOUND DESIGN GRANULAR LAYER (GSB/WMM/W

0.45
Here h = 510 mm
0.45
= #### MPa
RESILIENT MODULUS OF EXISTING UNBOUND GRANULAR LAYER (GSB/WMM/W
0.45
Here h = 260 mm
0.45
= #### MPa
Sl. No. Type of material Resilient modulus (Mpa) Poison's ratio

1 Bituminous Layers
DBM & BC with VG-10 1000 0.35
DBM & BC with VG-30 1700 0.35
DBM & BC with VG-40 3000 0.35
600 0.35
bitumen & 1% cement
BM with VG-10 500 0.35
BM with VG-30 700 0.35
WBM 350 0.35
CALCULATION OF THICKNESS OF BITUMINOUS LAYER BASED ON WEI

200 mm
260 mm

BITUMINOUS SURFACE
1 MR of distressed bituminous layer
2 MR of proposed bituminous layer
3 MR of existing granular layer
4 MR of proposed granular layer
h = ( 14 x 1700 ) + ( 51 x 183.21 ) - ( 26 x 135.29 +

1700
Thus,
h = 11.54 cm Say 115 mm
ALLOWABLE LONGITUDINAL AND VERTICAL STRAIN IN VARIOUS LAY

Sl. No. Type of material Type of analysis Referen
unit (E-06)
1 Bituminous Layer Fatigue 278.24 Equation 6
2 Sub Grade Rutting 544.74 Equation 6
3 Cementitious Layer Fatigue 246.39 Equation
FATIGUE ANALYSIS
BITUMINOUS LAYER
From Equation 6.1

3.89
-4 1 1
[ ] [
Nf = 2.21 x 10 x εt x MR
0.854
-4 1
[ ]
εt = 2.21 x 10 x MR
Nf
0.854
1
= 2.21 x 10
-4
x [ 1700 ]
26110000
-6
= 0.00027824 Or 278.24 x 10
RUTTING ANALYSIS
COMPUTATION OF ALLOWABLE COMPRESSIVE VERTICAL STRAIN ON SUBGRA

From Equation 6.4
4.5337
[ 1 ]
-8
[ ]
N = 4.1656 x 10 x
εv
= Vertical strain in the subgrade

εv
-8 4.5337
#### x 10
εv = [ N ]
-8 4.5337
=
[ ####
26110000
x 10
]
-6
= 0.00054474 Or 544.74 x 10
FATIGUE ANALYSIS
BITUMINOUS LAYER

C = 10M
Vb - 0.69
M = 4.84 X
( Va + Vb )
M = 4.84 X ( 0.03 + 0.13 )
M = 0.59
0.59
C = 10
Or C = 3.89
From Equation 6.3 3.89

-4 1 1
N = 0.5161 C x 10 x [ εt ] x
[ MR
0.854
-4 1
εt = 0.5161 x 3.89 x 10 x [ MR ]
N
0.854
= 0.5161 x 3.89 x 10
-4
x [ 1
#NAME? ]
26110000
-6
= #NAME? Or ### x 10
RUTTING ANALYSIS

From Equation 6.5
4.5337
-8 1
N = 1.41 x 10 x
[ εv ]
εv
-8 1/4.5337
= #### x 10
εv
[ N ]
1/4.5337
[ ]
-8
#### x 10
= #NAME?
-6
= #NAME? Or ### x 10
COMPUTATION OF ALLOWABLE HORIZONTAL TENSILE STRAIN AT T
FATIGUE ANALYSIS
From Equation 6.6
N = RF [ ( 113000 / E
0.8040
+ 191 ) ]
εt
Here RF = 1
N = 26.11 msa
E = 450 MPa
0.8040
Therefore = ( 113000 / E + 191 )

εt
1/12
( N / RF )
0.8040
Therefore = ( 113000 / 450 + 191 )

εt
1/12
[ 6
]
26.11 x 10 / 1
-6
( Clause 6.4 of IRC:64-1990 )
The design service volume that should be considered for design/improvement of a road facili
be the expected volume at the end of design life.This can be computed by projecting the present volume a
appropriate traffic growth rate.
n + x
A = P ( 1 + r )
Where

Number of years between the last count and the year of completion o
x =
construction

Here
r = 5 %
x = 2 years
n = 10 years
Therefore
2 + 10
A = 25429 ( 1 + 0.05 )
12
A = 25429 ( 1.05 )
A = 45667 PCU
As per IRC:64-1990, Design Service Volume in Plain Terrain and Low Curvature are as under
Sl No. Clause No. Terrain Curvature Width of Carriageway (m)
1 8.2 Plain Low Single lane 3.75

2 9.1 Plain Low Intermediate lane 5.50
3 10.1 Plain Low Double lane 7.00
Two lane with paved
4 10.3 Plain Low 10.50
shoulders
Four lane divided
5 11.2 Plain Low carriageway with paved 2x8.75
shoulders
Six lane divided
shoulders
OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS
3
ce of Cemented Base and
for tensile strain - 5

ng the design life of the road is
F x D
n the design in terms of msa

f completion of construction
ommercial vehicle )
he following formula.
ar of completion of construction
FIC
Figure/No. Unit
ODR
DUAL
2 No.
PLAIN
3056 No.
25429 No.
2 Years
0.75 No.
5 %
10 Years
4.5 No.
1528 No.
0.75 x 4.5
R
erage CBR
5.98
6.02
6.10
6.00
ON
Type of bitumen
Total
640 VG-30
655 VG-30
610 VG-30
625 VG-30
RAFFIC AND DESIGN

N
Type of bitumen
Total
649 VG-30
619 VG-30
649 VG-30
Type of
Total bitumen
650 VG-30
T
100 150
BC/SDBC upto 5msa
100 150
BC/SDBC upto 5msa
100 150
BC/SDBC upto 5msa

100 150
BC/SDBC upto 5msa
100 150
BC/SDBC upto 5msa

100 150
BC/SDBC upto 5msa
100 150
BC/SDBC upto 5msa

100 150
BC/SDBC upto 5msa
DE SOIL
ER (GSB/WMM/WBM)
YER (GSB/WMM/WBM)
OUS LAYERS
Poison's ratio Reference
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
Cl. 7.4.2
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35 ANNEX-VIII
0.35 ANNEX-VIII
0.35 ANNEX-VIII
0.25 Table X-2
0.25 Table X-2
BASED ON WEIGHTED
SED MODULES
140 mm
140 mm
250 mm
260 mm
OPOSED MODULE
VER EXISTING
Figure/No. Unit
500 MPa
1700 Mpa
135.29 MPa
183.21 MPa
20.00 x 500 )
N VARIOUS LAYERS
Reference
Equation 6.1/6.3
Equation 6.4/6.5
Equation 6.6
N AT THE BOTTOM OF
0.854
ous layer and
RAIN ON SUBGRADE
N AT THE BOTTOM OF
0.854
0.854
0.854
RAIN ON SUBGRADE
LE STRAIN AT THE
R
12
ilure against fatigue

r heavy volume roads
s in Rural Areas
vement of a road facility, should

g the present volume at an
r design
e year of completion of
s carried out in -----/2016

urvature are as under.
Design Service
Volume in PCU per
day
2000
6000
15000
17250
40000
>40000
0
PAVEMENT DESIGN
Foamed bitumen/Bitumen Emulsion Treated RAP/Aggregates Over Cemented Sub
No. of layers - 5 No. of critical locations for tensile strain -
The design traffic in terms of cumulative no.of standard axles to be carried during the design life of
n
N = 365 [ ( 1 + r ) - 1 ] x A x
r
Where N = Cumulative number of standard axles to be catered for in the design in terms of m
A = Initial traffic ( commercial vehicles per day ) in the year of completion of constructio
The traffic in the year of completion is estimated using the following formula
x
A = P ( 1 + r )
x = Number of years between the last count and the year of completion of cons

1 Category of road ( EW / NH / SH / MDR / ODR / VR )
2 Type of carriageway proposed ( SINGLE / DUAL )
3 No. of proposed lanes/carriageway ( 1 / 1.5 / 2 / 3 / 4 )
4 Type of terrain (PLAIN / ROLLING / HILLY)
CVPD
PCU
6 x
D
carriageway factor
Single 1/1.5 1.00
Single 2 0.50
Single 4 0.40
Dual 2 0.75
Dual 3 0.60
Dual 4 0.45
8 r
of IRC:37-2012 )
9 Design life in years ( As per Clause 4.3.2 of IRC :37-2012 ) n
F
No. of proposed
lanes/carriageway
Plain/Rolling Hilly
0-150 1.5 0.50
150-1500 3.5 1.50
>1500 4.5 2.50
11 P
2
Therefore, A = 1528 ( 1 + 0.05 )
A = 1685 CVPD
And
10
N = 365 [ ( 1 + 0.05 ) - 1 ] x 1685 x
0.05
Thus
N = 26108049 or 26.11 msa
1 5.98
2 6.02
3 6.10
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

20 40 90 250 260
6
30 40 105 250 260
20 40 90 250 230
7
30 40 105 250 230
COMPUTATION OF DESIGN CRUST FOR DESIGN TRAFFIC AND D

6 26.11 40 99 250 260

7 26.11 40 99 250 230
6.00 26.11 40 99 250 260
DESIGN CRUST
BC DBM
Base Base
6.00 26.11 40 100 250 260
PLATE 1 (CBR 3%)
2 5 10 20 30 50
Traffic in msa
PLATE 2 (CBR 4%)

2 5 10 20 30 50
Traffic in msa
PLATE 3 (CBR 5%)

2 5 10 20 30 50
Traffic in msa
PLATE 4 (CBR 6%)

2 5 10 20 30 50
Traffic in msa
PLATE 5 (CBR 7%)

2 5 10 20 30 50
Traffic in msa
PLATE 6 (CBR 8%)

Pavement Thic
2 5 10 20 30 50
Traffic in msa
PLATE 7 (CBR 9 & 10%)

2 5 10 20 30 50
Traffic in msa
PLATE 8 (CBR 15%)

Pavement Thickness i
2 5 10 20 30 50
Traffic in msa

0.64
Design CBR = 6.00 %
RESILIENT MODULUS OF UNBOUND DESIGN GRANULAR LAYER (GSB/WMM/W

0.45
Here h = 510 mm
0.45
= #### MPa
RESILIENT MODULUS OF EXISTING UNBOUND GRANULAR LAYER (GSB/WMM/W

0.45
Here h = 260 mm
0.45
= #### MPa
Sl. No. Type of material Resilient modulus (Mpa) Poison's ratio

1 Bituminous Layers
DBM & BC with VG-10 1000 0.35
DBM & BC with VG-30 1700 0.35
DBM & BC with VG-40 3000 0.35
600 0.35
bitumen & 1% cement
BM with VG-10 500 0.35
BM with VG-30 700 0.35
WBM 350 0.35
CALCULATION OF THICKNESS OF BITUMINOUS LAYER BASED ON WEI

200 mm
260 mm

BITUMINOUS SURFACE
1 MR of distressed bituminous layer
2 MR of proposed bituminous layer
3 MR of existing granular layer
4 MR of proposed granular layer
h = ( 14 x 1700 ) + ( 51 x 183.21 ) - ( 26 x 135.29 +

1700
Thus,
h = 11.54 cm Say 115 mm
ALLOWABLE LONGITUDINAL AND VERTICAL STRAIN IN VARIOUS LAY

Sl. No. Type of material Type of analysis Referen
unit (E-06)
1 Bituminous Layer Fatigue 278.24 Equation 6
2 Sub Grade Rutting 544.74 Equation 6
3 Cementitious Layer Fatigue 246.39 Equation
FATIGUE ANALYSIS
BITUMINOUS LAYER
From Equation 6.1

3.89
-4 1 1
[ ] [M
Nf = 2.21 x 10 x εt x R
0.854
-4 1
[ ]
εt = 2.21 x 10 x MR
Nf
0.854
1
= 2.21 x 10
-4
x [ 1700 ]
26110000
-6
= 0.00027824 Or 278.24 x 10
RUTTING ANALYSIS

From Equation 6.4
4.5337
[ 1 ]
-8
N = 4.1656 x 10 x
εv
[ ]

εv
-8 4.5337
#### x 10
εv = [ N ]
-8 4.5337
=
[ ####
26110000
x 10
]
-6
= 0.00054474 Or 544.74 x 10
FATIGUE ANALYSIS
BITUMINOUS LAYER

C = 10M
Vb - 0.69
M = 4.84 X
( Va + Vb )
M = 4.84 X ( 0.03 + 0.13 )
M = 0.59
0.59
C = 10
Or C = 3.89
From Equation 6.3 3.89

-4 1 1
N = 0.5161 C x 10 x [ εt ] x
[ MR
0.854
-4 1
εt = 0.5161 x 3.89 x 10 x [ MR ]
N
0.854
= 0.5161 x 3.89 x 10
-4
x [ 1
#NAME? ]
26110000
-6
= #NAME? Or ### x 10
RUTTING ANALYSIS

From Equation 6.5
4.5337
-8 1
N = 1.41 x 10 x
[ εv ]

εv
-8 1/4.5337
= #### x 10
εv
[ N ]
1/4.5337
[ ]
-8
#### x 10
= #NAME?
-6
= #NAME? Or ### x 10
COMPUTATION OF ALLOWABLE HORIZONTAL TENSILE STRAIN AT T
FATIGUE ANALYSIS
From Equation 6.6
N = RF [ ( 113000 / E
0.8040
+ 191 ) ]
εt
Here RF = 1
N = 26.11 msa
E = 450 MPa
0.8040
Therefore = ( 113000 / E + 191 )
εt
1/12
( N / RF )
0.8040
Therefore = ( 113000 / 450 + 191 )

εt
1/12
[ 6
]
26.11 x 10 / 1
-6
( Clause 6.4 of IRC:64-1990 )
The design service volume that should be considered for design/improvement of a road facili
be the expected volume at the end of design life.This can be computed by projecting the present volume a
appropriate traffic growth rate.
n + x
A = P ( 1 + r )
Where

Number of years between the last count and the year of completion o
x =
construction

Here
r = 5 %
x = 2 years
n = 10 years
Therefore
2 + 10
A = 25429 ( 1 + 0.05 )
12
A = 25429 ( 1.05 )
A = 45667 PCU
As per IRC:64-1990, Design Service Volume in Plain Terrain and Low Curvature are as under
Sl No. Clause No. Terrain Curvature Width of Carriageway (m)
1 8.2 Plain Low Single lane 3.75

2 9.1 Plain Low Intermediate lane 5.50
3 10.1 Plain Low Double lane 7.00
Two lane with paved
4 10.3 Plain Low 10.50
shoulders
Four lane divided
shoulders
Six lane divided
shoulders
4
er Cemented Sub base
for tensile strain - 3
ng the design life of the road is
F x D
n the design in terms of msa

f completion of construction
ommercial vehicle )
he following formula.
ar of completion of construction
FIC
Figure/No. Unit
ODR
DUAL
2 No.
PLAIN
3056 No.
25429 No.
2 Years
0.75 No.
5 %
10 Years
4.5 No.
1528 No.
0.75 x 4.5
R
erage CBR
5.98
6.02
6.10
6.00
ON
Type of bitumen
Total
640 VG-30
655 VG-30
610 VG-30
625 VG-30
RAFFIC AND DESIGN

N
Type of bitumen
Total
649 VG-30
619 VG-30
649 VG-30
Type of
Total bitumen
650 VG-30
T
100 150
BC/SDBC upto 5msa
100 150
BC/SDBC upto 5msa
100 150
BC/SDBC upto 5msa
100 150
BC/SDBC upto 5msa
100 150
BC/SDBC upto 5msa

100 150
BC/SDBC upto 5msa
100 150
BC/SDBC upto 5msa

100 150
BC/SDBC upto 5msa
DE SOIL
ER (GSB/WMM/WBM)
YER (GSB/WMM/WBM)
OUS LAYERS
Poison's ratio Reference
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
Cl. 7.4.2
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35 ANNEX-VIII
0.35 ANNEX-VIII
0.35 ANNEX-VIII
0.25 Table X-2
0.25 Table X-2
BASED ON WEIGHTED
SED MODULES
140 mm
250 mm
260 mm
OPOSED MODULE
VER EXISTING
Figure/No. Unit
500 MPa
1700 Mpa
135.29 MPa
183.21 MPa
20.00 x 500 )
N VARIOUS LAYERS
Reference
Equation 6.1/6.3
Equation 6.4/6.5
Equation 6.6
N AT THE BOTTOM OF
0.854
ous layer and
RAIN ON SUBGRADE
N AT THE BOTTOM OF
0.854
0.854
0.854
RAIN ON SUBGRADE
LE STRAIN AT THE
R
12
ilure against fatigue

r heavy volume roads
s in Rural Areas
vement of a road facility, should

g the present volume at an
r design
e year of completion of
s carried out in -----/2016

urvature are as under.
Design Service
Volume in PCU per
day
2000
6000
15000
17250
40000
>40000
0
PAVEMENT DESIGN
Cemented Base and Granular Sub base with Crack Relief Interlayer of Aggregate
The design traffic in terms of cumulative no.of standard axles to be carried during the design life of the
n
N = 365 [ ( 1 + r ) - 1 ] x A x F x
r
x
A = P ( 1 + r )
x = Number of years between the last count and the year of completion of construct

CVPD 567
PCU 25429
6 x 2
D 0.50
carriageway factor
Single 1/1.5 1.00
Single 2 0.50
Single 4 0.40
Dual 2 0.75
Dual 3 0.60
Dual 4 0.45
8 r 5
of IRC:37-2012 )
F 3.5
No. of proposed
lanes/carriageway
Plain/Rolling Hilly
0-150 1.5 0.50
150-1500 3.5 1.50
>1500 4.5 2.50
11 P 567
2
Therefore, A = 567 ( 1 + 0.05 )
A = 625 CVPD
And
10
N = 365 [ ( 1 + 0.05 ) - 1 ] x 625 x 0.50 x
0.05
Thus
N = 5021331 or 5.02 msa
1 5.00
2 6.00
3 7.00
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

CBR Design Traffic (msa) Crack Relief Type of

Cementitious Granular Sub
BC DBM Interlayer of Total
Base Base
Aggregate
5 40 0 100 210 250 600 VG
5
10 40 0 100 250 250 640 VG
5 30 0 100 250 250 630 VG
10
10 40 0 100 250 250 640 VG

CBR Design Traffic (msa) Crack Relief Cementitious Granular Sub Type of
BC DBM Total
Layer Base Base
5 5.02 40 0 100 210 250 600 VG
10 5.02 30 0 100 250 250 630 VG
5.40 5.02 39 0 100 213 250 602 VG
DESIGN CRUST
(msa) Typ
(msa) Typ
Crack Relief Cementitious Granular bitum
BC DBM Layer Base
Total
Sub Base
5.40 5.02 40 0 100 215 250 605 VG
PLATE 21 (CBR 3%)
50 50
40 40 50 50
30 50 50
100 100 100 100
100 100 100
210 230 240 240 250 210 220
250 250 250 250 250 250 250
2 5 10 20 30 50 100
Traffic in msa
G Subbase CT Base CRIA DBM
PLATE 22 (CBR 5%)

50 50
30 40 50 50
30 50 50
100 100 100 100
100 100
100
190 210 210 220 230 190 200
250 250 250 250 250 250 250
2 5 10 20 30 50 100
Traffic in msa
PLATE 23 (CBR 10%)

50 50
40 50 50
30 30 50
50
100 100 100 100
100 100 100
170 190 190 200 210

170 180
250 250 250 250 250 250 250
2 5 10 20 30 50 100
Traffic in msa
PLATE 24 (CBR 15%)

ss in mm
50 50
30 40 50 50
30 50 50
30 40 50 50
Pavement Thickness in
30 50 50
100 100 100 100
100 100 100
140 160 170 180 190

150 160
250 250 250 250 250 250 250
2 5 10 20 30 50 100
Traffic in msa
RESILIENT MODULUS OF VARIOUS LAYER

SUBGRADE SOIL
0.64
Design CBR = 5.40 %
UNBOUND DESIGN GRANULAR LAYER (GSB)

0.45
Here h = 250 mm
0.45
MR_granular = 0.2 x 250 x 51.79
= 124.27 MPa

0.45
Here h = 260 mm
0.45
MR_granular = 0.2 x 260 x 51.79
= 126.48 MPa

1 Bituminous Layers
DBM & BC with VG-10 1000 0.35
DBM & BC with VG-30 1700 0.35
DBM & BC with VG-40 3000 0.35
Cl. 7
600 0.35
bitumen & 1% cement
BM with VG-10 500 0.35
BM with VG-30 700 0.35
WBM 350 0.35 ANNE
ALLOWABLE LONGITUDINAL AND VERTICAL STRAIN IN
VARIOUS LAYERS
unit (E-06)
FATIGUE ANALYSIS
BITUMINOUS LAYER
From Equation 6.1

3.89 0.854
-4 1 1
[ ] [ ]
Nf = 2.21 x 10 x εt x MR
0.854
-4 1
[ ]
εt = 2.21 x 10 x MR
Nf
0.854
1
= 2.21 x 10
-4
x [ 1700 ]
5020000
-6
= 0.0004251138 Or 425.11 x 10
RUTTING ANALYSIS

From Equation 6.4
4.5337
N = 4.1656 x 10
-8
x
[ 1
εv ]
-8 4.5337
4.1656 x 10
εv = [ N ]
-8 4.5337
=
[ 4.1656
5020000
x 10
]
-6
= 0.0007836867 Or 783.69 x 10
ALLOWABLE LONGITUDINAL AND VERTICAL STRAIN IN
VARIOUS LAYERS
unit (E-06)
1 Bituminous Layer Fatigue #NAME? Equation 6.1/6.
2 Sub Grade Rutting #NAME? Equation 6.4/6.

BITUMINOUS LAYER

C = 10M
Vb - 0.69
M = 4.84 X
( Va + Vb )
Therefore 0.13
M = 4.84 X
( 0.03 + 0.13
- 0.69
)
M = 0.59
0.59
C = 10
Or C = 3.89

-4 1 1
N = 0.5161 C x 10 x [ εt ] x
[ MR ]
0.854
-4 1
εt = 0.5161 x 3.89 x 10 x [ MR ]
N
0.854
= 0.5161 x 3.89 x 10
-4
x [ 1
#NAME? ]
5020000
-6
= #NAME? Or ### x 10
RUTTING ANALYSIS

From Equation 6.5
4.5337
-8 1
N = 1.41 x 10 x [ εv ]
-8 1/4.5337
εv
[ ]
= 1.4100 x 10
N
1/4.5337
[ ]
-8
1.4100 x 10
= #NAME?
-6
= #NAME? Or ### x 10
COMPUTATION OF ALLOWABLE HORIZONTAL TENSILE STRAIN AT THE
FATIGUE ANALYSIS
N = RF [ ( 113000 / E
0.8040
+ 191 ) ]
εt
Here RF = 2
N = 5.02 msa
E = 450 MPa
0.8040
Therefore εt = ( 113000 / E + 191 )
1/12
( N / RF )
0.8040
Therefore εt = ( 113000 / 450 + 191 )

1/12
[ 5.02 x 10
6
/ 2 ]
-6
( Clause
of IRC:64-1990 )
A = P ( 1 + r )
Where

x =
construction

Here
P = 25429 PCU As per traffic census carried out in -----/2
r = 5 %
x = 2 years
n = 10 years
Therefore
2 + 10
A = 25429 ( 1 + 0.05 )
12
A = 25429 ( 1.05 )
A = 45667 PCU
in PC
Two lane with paved
0.00 m ie 0
NT DESIGN
e with Crack Relief Interlayer of Aggregate
ndard axles to be carried during the design life of the road is
standard axles to be catered for in the design in terms of msa

ial vehicles per day ) in the year of completion of construction
ween the last count and the year of completion of construction

OF DESIGN TRAFFIC
Unit
No.
No.
No.
Years
No.
Years
No.
No.
3.5
N OF DESIGN CBR
Average CBR
5.00
6.00
7.00
5.40
AR INTERPOLATION
Type of bitumen
VG-30
VG-30
VG-30
VG-30

R INTERPOLATION
Type of bitumen
VG-30
VG-30
VG-30
N CRUST
Type of
VG-30
ESS DESIGN CHART
21 (CBR 3%)
50
50
100
230
250
150
Traffic in msa
BC
22 (CBR 5%)
50
50
100
210
250
150
Traffic in msa
BC
3 (CBR 10%)
50
50
100
190
250
150
Traffic in msa
BC
4 (CBR 15%)
50
50
50
100
170
250
150
Traffic in msa
BC
US OF VARIOUS LAYER
RADE SOIL
GRANULAR LAYER (GSB)
ULAR LAYER (GSB/WMM/WBM)

Reference
Cl. 7.4.2
ANNEX-VIII
ANNEX-VIII
ANNEX-VIII
Table X-2
Table X-2
AL AND VERTICAL STRAIN IN
US LAYERS
Reference
Equation 6.1/6.3
Equation 6.4/6.5
Equation 6.6
E ANALYSIS
NOUS LAYER
G ANALYSIS

AL AND VERTICAL STRAIN IN
US LAYERS
Reference
Equation 6.1/6.3
Equation 6.4/6.5
Equation 6.6

NOUS LAYER
G ANALYSIS

HORIZONTAL TENSILE STRAIN AT THE
MENTITIOUS LAYER
RVICE VOLUME
of IRC:64-1990
considered )
an be computed by projecting the present volume at an
-----/2016
Design Service
Volume2000
in PCU per
6000
15000
17250
40000
>40000
0
From Equation 6.1
Nf = 2.21 x
= Maximum tensile strain at the bottom of bitum

εt
εt = 2.21 x 10
= 2.21 x 10
#REF!
= Err:504
RU
COMPUTATION OF ALLOWABLE C
When Cumu
From Equation 6.4
N = 4.1656 x

εv
4.1656
εv = [ N
=
[ 4.1656
Err:504
= Err:504
3.89
-4 1 1
[ ] [
10 x εt x MR
standard axles
ain at the bottom of bituminous layer and
bituminous layer
0.854
-4 1
[ ]
x MR
Nf
0.854
1
-4
x [ Err:504 ]
#REF!
-6
Or Err:504 x 10
RUTTING ANALYSIS
ON OF ALLOWABLE COMPRESSIVE VERTICAL STRAIN ON SUBGRADE
4.5337
[ 1 ]
-8
10 x
εv
andard axles and
-8 4.5337
x 10
N ]
-8 4.5337
Err:504
x 10
]
-6
Or Err:504 x 10
0.854

Design IS 37

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Design IS 37

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

TRAFFIC CENSUS

( For Design of Crust by IRC:37-2012 & IRC:SP:62-2014 )

SLOW VEHICLES TOTAL

675 5567 239 23.29

COMPUTATION OF DESIGN TRAFFIC

DATA FOR LINEAR INTERPOLATION

20 40 ### 250 300 690

COMPUTATION OF DESIGN CRUST FOR DESIGN TRAFFIC AND

5 24.27 40 109 250 300 699

225 250 250 250 250 250 250

335 380 380 380 380 380

PLATE 2 (CBR 4%)

225 250 250 250 250 250 250

265 285 330 330 330 330 330

PLATE 3 (CBR 5%)

250 250 250 250 250 250

250 300 300 300 300 300

225 250 250 250 250 250 250

260 260 260 260 260

250 250 250 250 250 250

180 230 230 230 230 230

PLATE 6 (CBR 8%)

250 250 250 250 250

200 200 200 200 200

PLATE 7 (CBR 9 & 10%)

200 200 200 200 200

250 250 250 250 250

200 200 200 200 200

RESILIENT MODULUS OF VARIOUS LAYER

MR_subgrade = 10 x CBR For CBR=<5

Design CBR = 5.45 %

Thus, MR_subgrade = 52 Mpa

UNBOUND GRANULAR LAYER (GSB/WMM/WBM)

Where h = Thickness of layer in mm

EXISTING UNBOUND GRANULAR LAYER (GSB/WMM/WBM)

Where h = Thickness of layer in mm

RESILIENT MODULUS AND POISON'S RATIO OF VARIOUS LAYERS

Sl. No. Type of material Resilient modulus Poison's ratio

Where Nf = Fatigue life in no. of standard axles

Where N = No. of cumulative standard axles and

From Equation 6.3 3.89 0.854

DESIGN SERVICE VOLUME

P = Number of PCUs per day at last count

r = Annual growth rate of PCU

Sl No. Clause No. Terrain Curvature Width of Carriageway (m) Desig

mber of standard axles to be catered for in the design in terms of msa

completion is estimated using the following formula.

RUST FOR DESIGN TRAFFIC AND DESIGN

ATE 2 (CBR 4%)

ATE 3 (CBR 5%)

ATE 6 (CBR 8%)

E 7 (CBR 9 & 10%)

ULUS OF VARIOUS LAYER

LAR LAYER (GSB/WMM/WBM)

RANULAR LAYER (GSB/WMM/WBM)

ctor for cementitious material for failure against fatigue

Volume in Plain Terrain and Low Curvature are as under.

COMPUTATION OF DESIGN CBR

DATA FOR LINEAR INTERPOLATION

5 2.00 20 ### 225 215 510 VG

COMPUTATION OF DESIGN CRUST FOR DESIGN TRAFFIC AND DES

225 250 250 250 250 250 250

325 335 380 380 380 380 380