Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
SUMMARY
This paper aims to highlight the two-way airflow effect due to temperature difference in
indoor air quality through three case studies. First one is the largest nosocomial SARS
outbreak in Hong Kong, 2003: 8A Ward case. Second one is an experimental chamber study
that simulates maintaining positive pressure indoors using mechanical ventilation system for
preventing the entry of outdoor airborne particles: I/O control case. Third one is a case study
of odor dispersion from negative pressure bathroom to corridor in a school office: Bathroom
case. These three case studies include hospital infection disease transmission, outdoor
airborne particles’ entry control and indoor contaminant dispersion. A multi-zone model
combing two-way airflow effect was used to analyze these phenomenon and all the cases
demonstrate the significance of two-way airflow effect due to temperature difference in
indoor air quality.
IMPLICATIONS
KEYWORDS
INTRODUCTION
∑Q
i =1
i,in = ∑Q
i = n +1
i,out (1),
where Qi,in is the inflow rate while Qi,out is the outflow rate (m3/h).
H is the height of the openings. The elevation ( y ) of H / 2 was assumed as the
reference elevation of the opening between two adjacent, j and k , zones, y = 0 . The pressure
at y in j and k zones can be calculated by:
Pj (y) = Pj (0) − ρ jgy (2),
Pk (y) = Pk (0) − ρk gy (3),
where g is gravitational acceleration (m/s ). ρ j and ρk are the air density in j and k zone
2
(kg/m3), respectively. The neutral height, Y , is at the position where the air velocity is zero,
which is equivalent to the following equation:
Pj (Y) = Pk (Y) (4),
When Y < H / 2 , Assuming j zone is in overall “positive pressure” towards k zone,
the relationship between airflow and pressure difference at the opening can be described as
(CONTAMW, 2002):
2 2g ∆ρ H 3
Q j− k = Cd W ( + Y )2 (5),
3 ρ 2
2 2g ∆ρ H 3
Qk − j = Cd W ( − Y )2 (6),
3 ρ 2
where ∆ρ is the air density difference between j and k zone (due to the temperature
difference). W is the width of the openings. The shape of the openings was assumed as
rectangle. C d is the discharge coefficient of the opening, which is set at 0.78, as the
experiments by Weber and Kearney (1980) have shown this value works well for most
applications. However, it is known that the discharge coefficient for large openings such as
doorways and windows is difficult to be determined. If Y ≥ H / 2 , there is no two-way
airflow existing at the door opening. In this case, slightly different formulas are needed (Li et
al., 2000).
The energy balance equation for each zone can be expressed as:
n m
∑ ρcp Ti Qi,in + S =
i =1
∑ ρc TQ
i = n +1
p i,out (7),
where cp is the specific heat capacity (J/(kg·K)). Ti is the temperature of the inflow at the
supply diffusers, exhaust grilles or openings (K). T is the temperature of this zone (K). S is
the heat gain in each zone (W). It was assumed that the heat gain was uniformly distributed in
a zone.
The contaminants mass balance equation for each zone can be expressed as:
n m
∑C Q
i =1
i i,in + Sc = ∑ CQ
i = n +1
i,out (8),
where Ci is the normalized contaminants concentration of the inflow at the supply diffusers,
exhaust grilles or openings. C is the normalized contaminants concentration of this zone. Sc
is the contaminants emission rate in each zone (1/s). It was assumed that the contaminants was
uniformly distributed in a zone.
RESULTS
21.6
0.014 0.018
21.1 21.3
0.03 0.000 0.03 0.011
22.0
Figure 1. Comparison of bio-aerosol distributions using multi-zone model without and with
two-way airflow due to temperature difference and CFD approach
1.00
0.90
0.80
Ccorridor/Cbathroom
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0.01 0.1 1 10
Temperature difference ( )
DISCUSSION
For indoor air quality investigation, CFD simulation is a good approach for obtaining detailed
information of air and contaminates distribution. CFD allows us to evaluate each geometrical
and ventilation parameters on dispersion of virus-laden particles, however, CFD is also more
expensive to run in terms of computer cost as compared to other simpler analysis methods for
airflow. Furthermore, it may be difficult to separate the influence of different factors using
CFD. Therefore, this paper presents a multi-zone model combining the two-way airflow effect
to analyze the three cases, which may be simpler and easy to separate the influence of two-
way airflow effect.
CONCLUSIONS
These three case studies include hospital infection disease transmission, outdoor airborne
particles’entry control and indoor contaminant dispersion. A multi-zone model combing two-
way airflow effect was used to analyze these phenomenon and all the cases demonstrate the
significance of two-way airflow effect due to temperature difference in indoor air quality.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This study was sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.
51078216) and supported by Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program.
REFERENCES
Chen, C., Zhao, B., Yang, X., Li, Y. (2010) Role of two-way airflow owing to temperature
difference in severe acute respiratory syndrome transmission: revisiting the largest
nosocomial severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreak in Hong Kong. Journal of the Royal
Society Interface, DOI:10.1098/rsif.2010.0486.
Chen, C., Zhao, B., Yang, X. (2011) Impact of two-way air flow due to temperature difference
on preventing the entry of outdoor particles using indoor positive pressure control method.
Journal of Hazardous Materials, DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.12.003.
CONTAMW. (2002) CONTAMW user’s manual, National Institute of Standards and
Technology, Gaithersburg, MD: NIST.
Li, Y., Delsante, A., Symons, J. (2000) Prediction of natural ventilation in buildings with
large openings. Build. Environ. 35, 191-206.
Li, Y., Huang, X., Yu, I.T.S., Wong, T.W., Qian, H. (2005) Role of air distribution in SARS
transmission during the largest nosocomial outbreak in Hong Kong, Indoor Air, 15, 83-95.
Weber, D.D., Kearney. R.J. (1980) Natural convective heat transfer through an aperture in
passive solar heated buildings. 5th National Passive Solar Conference, 1037-1041.