Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 94

STRESS MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES ADOPTED BY TEACHERS

IN PUBLIC PRIMARY SCHOOLS IN


OBIO/AKPOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA,
RIVERS STATE

BY

ORDUGO, GLADYS NNENNA


NTI/PGDE 2018/5667

A PROJECT SUBMITTED TO THE


NATIONAL TEACHERS’ INSTITUTE KADUNA,
RUMUEME STUDY CENTRE, PORT HARCOURT.
IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
AWARD OF POST GRADUATE DIPLOMA IN EDUCATION (PGDE)

DECEMBER, 2018.

i
DECLARATION

I hereby declare that this is my original research work and it

has not been submitted anywhere for the award of any degree.

ii
CERTIFICATION

This is to certify that this project was carried out by Ordugo

Gladys Nnenna of National Teachers’ Institute Kaduna, Rumueme

Study Centre, Port Harcourt, and has been read and approved by

the undersigned.

Dr. Mrs. Amini-Philips ……………… ..…………


Supervisor Signature Date

Dr. Ogidi R. C. ……………… …………..


Centre Co-ordinator (PGDE) Signature Date

Dr. Jegede K. T. ……………… .…………


State Co-ordinator Signature Date

iii
DEDICATION

This project is dedicated to God Almighty for His love,

protection, guidance and provision

iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I wish to express my deep appreciation to the host of people

whose assistance and guidance where instrumental to the success

of this project.

I am particularly grateful to my project supervisor, Dr. Mrs.

Amini-Philips for her remarkable guidance, support, kindness and

thoroughness in reading through this work. I am equally grateful to

my Centre Coordinator, Dr. Ogidi R. C. for his fatherly advice and

encouragement.

Also, my special thanks go to my beloved, Mr. Soka Saaroh

Sorbari, my lovely parents, Mr. and Mrs. Emmanuel W. Ordugo and

my cousins, Emeka and Franklin Wosa for their magnanimous

supports.

v
TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGES

Title Page i

Declaration ii

Certification iii

Dedication iv

Acknowledge v

Table of Contents vi

List of Tables ix

Abstract xi

CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background to the Study 1

1.2 Statement of the Problem 5

1.3 Purpose of the Study 6

1.4 Research Questions 7

1.5 Research Hypotheses 7

1.6 Significance of the Study 8

1.7 Scope of the Study 10

1.8 Operational Definition of Terms 11

CHAPTER TWO: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE


2.1 Conceptual Review 12

vi
Teachers’ Stress, Strain and Burnout 14

Causes of Teachers Stress 17

Symptoms of Stress among Teachers 21

Stress Management Strategies 25

2.2 Theoretical Review 28

Conservation of Resources Theory 29

Cognitive Activation Theory of Stress 31

2.3 Review of Empirical Studies on Occupational


Stressand Job Satisfaction among Primary
School Teachers 32

2.4 Review of Related Empirical Studies 34

2.5 Summary of Review of Related Literature 35

CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3.1 Research Design 36

3.2 Area of the Study 37

3.3 Population of the Study 37

3.4 Sample and Sampling Techniques 37

3.5 Instrument for Data Collection 38

3.6 Validity of the Instrument 40

3.7 Reliability of the Instrument 40

3.8 Method of Data Collection 41

vii
3.9 Method of Data Analysis 41

CHAPTER FOUR: DATA PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION


4.1 Research Question One 44

4.2 Research Question Two 47


4.3 Research Question Three 48
4.4 Research Question Four 50
4.5 Research Question Five 52

4.6 Research Question Six 54


4.7 Research Hypothesis One 55

4.8 Research Hypothesis Two 58


4.9 Research Hypothesis Three 60

4.10 Summary of Findings 61

CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND


RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Summary of the Study 64

5.2 Conclusion of the Study 65

5.3 Implications of the Study 66

5.4 Recommendations 67

5.5 Limitations of the Study 68

5.6 Suggestions for Further Research 69

References 70
Teachers’ Stress Management Strategies
Questionnaire (TSMSQ) 75
Appendix 78

viii
LIST OF TABLES
PAGE
Table 1: Frequencies and percentages of key sources
of stress among public primary school teachers
inObio/Akpor L.G.A 44

Table 2: Frequencies and percentages of perceived effects


of stress on teachers in public primary schools
inObio/Akpor L.G.A 47

Table 3: Mean, standard deviation and mode of


respondents on stress management
strategies adopted by teachers in public
primary schools in Obio/Akpor L.G.A 48

Table 4: Means, standard deviations and modes of male


and female respondents on stress
management strategies adopted by teachers in
public primary schools in Obio/Akpor L.G.A 50

Table 5: Means, standard deviations and modes


of respondents between the ages of 25–39 years
and 40–55 years on stress management
strategies adopted by teachers in public
primary schools in Obio/Akpor L.G.A 52

Table 6: Means, standard deviations and modes


of respondents on the stress level of teachers
based on number of pupils in a class in public
primary schools in Obio/Akpor L.G.A 54

Table 7: T-test analysis of significant difference in the


mean stress management strategies scores of
male and female teachers in public primary
schools inObio/Akpor L.G.A, Rivers State 56

Table 8: T-test analysis of significant difference in the


mean stress management strategies scores of
teachers with regards to age. 58

Table 9: T-test analysis of significant difference in the


mean scores of teacher stress levels with respect
to number of pupils in a class. 60

ix
ABSTRACT

This study investigated stress management strategies adopted by


teachers in public primary schools. The area of the study was
Obio/Akpor Local Government Area of Rivers State, Nigeria. The
study adopted descriptive survey design approach. The population of
the study was 793 public primary school teachers comprising of 56
males and 737 females. A sample of 250 respondents consisting of
16 male and 234 female teachers was drawn from the population
using stratified random sampling technique. Six research questions
and three null hypotheses were answered and tested in the study. A
validated instrument titled “Teachers’ Stress Management Strategies
Questionnaire (TSMSQ)” was used to collect data from the
participants. Data collected were subjected to SPSS application
software for analyses and interpretations. The data were analyzed
using descriptive statistics which include frequencies, percentages,
means and standard deviations. Independent t-test analysis was
used to evaluate the null hypotheses at 0.05 levels of significance.
The findings of the study revealed that; financial factors,
overcrowded pupils in a class, and lack of staffs training by
government were key sources of teachers’ stress in the study area.
However, the findings of the study had also revealed that the stress
management strategies adopted by public primary school teachers in
the study area were positive; and there was no significant difference
in the mean stress management strategies scores of male and female
teachers. Based on the findings, it was recommended that
government should improve teachers’ welfare and also employ more
teachers in public primary schools to reduce teacher’s workload and
stress.

x
CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background to the Study

Teaching is a delicate job that requires specific behavior

in the classroom. Teachers need psychological, physical and

spiritual balance to cope with intense stress resulting from

teaching job. Our society expects teachers to be well rounded

educationally and emotionally. However, teachers experience a

number of different pressures and stressors, such as: difficult

students, difficult classes, taking work home, lack of

administrative support, pressure from parents, teachers’

evaluation, professional development, job uncertainty,

integration of intelligence and technology, students’ and

parents’ bullying, etc. Since the existence of western education

till date, teachers have been traumatized by emotional,

psychological, mental and physical problems or distances

brought about by stress. These problems pose threat to the

health of teachers and most times their ability to live in

harmony with people around them. Even though stress can

never be wished away in man’s life, and even though human

beings need some moderate level of stress to function

1
effectively in certain situations, when it becomes too much and

persistent, will cause some damage in the psychological and

physiological well-being of the person (Ekwe, 2000). Thus,

every research and literary work on stress has a primary

motive of creating awareness about the issue so as to help

people develop ways of coping and maintaining good health

(Amadi, 2007). According to Cooper and Marshall, (1976)

“Stress is a condition in which an individual is kept under

worries which disrupts one’s emotional state”. He further

stated that it is any demand or condition that affect an

individual’s normal way of functioning; which induces him to

take extra step in order to cope with such condition. Laheh,

(2003) notes that stress is any event or circumstances that

strain or exceed a person’s ability to cope. Reber and Reber

(2001) stated that stress is a force that when applied to a

system causes some severe change of its original form and

brings it to disorganized form. Conversely, Santrock (2000)

defined stress as “the response of individuals to the

circumstances and events called stressor that threaten them

and tax their coping abilities”. A stressor is an external factor

2
which is disruptive in nature and may lead teachers to take

certain steps to maintain personal equilibrium.

Teacher’s stress has been defined as “the experiences by

a teacher of pleasant emotions such as tension, frustration,

anxiety, anger and depression resulting from teaching job

(Kyriacou, 2001). Stress is a generalized non- specific response

of the body to the physical and psychological demands made

on it (Denga, 1991). In this case, response of stress comes in

different forms and patterns in a simultaneous way. For

instance, body responses like headache, stomach up-set, body

weakness and restlessness can all be experienced at the onset

of stress (Selye, 1994).

In describing the nature of stress, Chika and Iwundu

(2006) observed that stress is experienced by all categories of

people which includes old and young, rich and poor, male and

female, employed and unemployed, literate and illiterate.

According to them, it is normal to experience stress but the

danger in it is when it becomes excess for somebody to contain

because at that point, it becomes injurious to health. All stress

therefore, whether academic or non-academic, overt or covert

plays a role in the development of many organic and mental

3
disorders. Stress wear and tear our bodies as we adjust to

challenges of our continually changing environment. For these

reasons, teachers ought to make use of certain measures to

manage stress and adapt these strategies in order to cope

effectively in school. Ode, (2005) suggested that learning to

cope with stress is desirable because those who do not cope

develop serious problem of anxiety that impairs their efficiency

and leads to ill health.

The working environment has great impact on level of

stress. In Obio/Akpor Local Government Area of Rivers State,

the public primary schools are being run by state government

with a set of rules and regulations, which sometimes impose

stress on the teachers. The effects of stress can reduce

teacher’s performances at work, increased sickness, absence

and even death.

With all these at the back of our mind, we now

understand that stress can be detrimental to health and

teachers’ performance at work. It is against the background of

healthy activities and teachers’ work performances that

motivated the researcher towards ascertaining the strategies

that should be used by teachers to manage stress.

4
1.2 Statement of the Problem

Stress is unavoidable as it has been with man for ages

but excessive stress could be hazardous to health and work

performance. Teachers are exposed to a lot of stress which

could affect their wellbeing and performances.

The researcher has observed and witnessed some

teachers sweating profusely with severe headaches at work,

while some even leave the teaching profession in search of

other jobs because of the much stress they face.

Primary school teachers experience higher levels of

teaching stress due to demanding situations while dealing with

pupils. Overcrowded classroom, heavy syllabus and

inadequate facilities make teachers’ work complex (Shukla,

2008). Almost every public primary school teacher, irrespective

of their gender, age, and level of study complain of the

excessive stress they encounter and the negative effects it has

on them. It is on this basis that determining stress

management strategies among public primary school teachers

in Obio/Akpor Local Government Area of Rivers State is

necessary.

5
1.3 Purpose of the Study

The purpose of this study is to find out the stress

management strategies adopted by public primary school

teachers in Obio/Akpor Local Government Area, Rivers State.

Specifically, the study tends to determine the:

1. Sources of stress among public primary school teachers

in Obio/Akpor L.G.A, Rivers State.

2. Perceived effects of stress on teachers in public primary

school in Obio/Akpor L.G.A.

3. Stress management strategies adopted by teachers in

public primary schools in Obio/ Akpor L.G.A, Rivers

state.

4. Influence of gender on stress management strategies

adopted by teachers in public primary schools in

Obio/Akpor L.G.A, Rivers State.

5. Influence of age on stress management strategies adopted

by teachers in public primary schools in Obio/Akpor

L.G.A, Rivers State.

6
1.4 Research Questions

The study sought answers to the following research

questions.

1. What are the key sources of stress among teachers in

public primary schools in Obio/Akpor L.G.A, Rivers

State?

2. What are the perceived effects of stress on teachers in

public primary schools in Obio/Akpor L.G.A, Rivers

State?

3. What are the stress management strategies adopted by

teachers in public primary schools in Obio/Akpor L.G.A?

4. What are the influences of gender on stress management

strategies adopted by teachers in public primary schools

in Obio/Akpor L.G.A, Rivers State?

5. What is the influence of age on stress management

strategies adopted by teachers in public primary schools

in Obio/Akpor L.G A, Rivers State?

6. What is the influence of number of pupils in a class on

the stress levels of teachers?

1.5 Research Hypotheses

The following null hypotheses were tested in the study:

7
1. There is no significant difference in the mean stress

management strategies scores of male and female

teachers in public primary schools in Obio/Akpor Local

Government Area of Rivers State.

2. There is no significant difference in the mean stress

management strategies scores of teachers with regards to

age.

3. There is no significant difference in teachers stress level

with respect to the number of pupils per class.

1.6 Significance of the Study

The findings of the study will provide data on literature

for academics as a basis for further research.

This study has both practical and theoretical significance.

Theoretically, the findings of this study will help to verify and

sustain Selyes’ theory of General Adaptation Syndrome (GAS)

which posits that, individuals pass through three stages of

stress: first, being the alarm stages - when one becomes aware

of the stressors. Second, the resistance stage - when one uses

a variety of means to overcome the stress. Third, the

exhaustion stage - when the stress persists, which wears out

the victim.

8
This theory will help the teachers to be aware of three

stages of stress, and adapt good strategies in stress

management so as to avoid harmful effect of stress in their

occupational life.

Practically, the beneficiaries of this study will be the

primary school teachers, pupils, teacher educators, ministry of

education, state universal basic education board, researchers

and curriculum planners. The result of this study will be of

benefit to the primary school teachers when it is published in

the sense that it will enable them understand better strategies

of their stress management, which will improve their

performance. Pupils will benefit from the findings of this study

for the fact that, when teachers adjust with the help of good

stress management strategies, they will put in their best and

better teaching – learning will be enhanced.

Teacher educators will benefit from this study because it

will enable them identify appropriate and more effective stress

management strategies that will help improve teaching and

learning processes in the school. Ministry of education will

benefit maximally because when this study is published, it will

enable them organize workshops, seminars and conferences

9
for teachers on effective stress management strategies. State

universal basic education board will also benefit from the

findings of this study because, it will enable them solve the

problem of insufficient teachers by employing and posting

more teachers to the required schools.

Researchers will benefit from the findings of this study

when it is published, in the sense that, it will serve as source

of information in their future research work. Curriculum

planners will also benefit from these findings because, it will

enable them include effective stress management strategies in

the school curriculum to be taught to students and future

teachers.

1.7 Scope of the Study

The sampled schools are spread widely in the entire

Obio/Akpor Local Government Area of Rivers State and

therefore, the uniformity of stress management strategies

adopted by teachers may vary from one public primary school

to another. Therefore caution will be taken when generalizing

the findings from different public primary schools to the entire

Local Government Area.

10
Private primary schools in Obio/Akpor Local Government

Area of Rivers State are not part of this study. The research

work is delimited to the stress management strategies adopted

by teachers in public primary school in Obio/Akpor L .G. A,

Rivers State

1.8 Operational Definition of Terms

For the purpose of this study, the following will be

adopted as working definition of some selected terms:

Stress: This is a condition/situation, internal or environmental

that imposes demand for adjustment on an organism.

Stressor: This is an activity, overt or stimulus that causes

stress.

Burnout: This is an emotional, mental or physical exhaustion

that comes from job–related stress.

Strain: This is any unpleasant behavioral, psychological or

physiological outcome in a teacher.

11
CHAPTER TWO
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

This chapter aimed at revealing literature relevant to the

study, which shall be discussed under the following

subheadings:

1. Conceptual Review

2. Theoretical Review

3. Empirical Review

4. Summary of Literature Review

2.1 Conceptual Review

Stress is as old as human existence. Every living being is

always faced with issues and problems that lead to stress. Life

itself is full of stressful situations. This is because man makes

efforts to modify his physical environment in the course of

living, his environment on the course of living; his environment

equally makes demand and puts pressure on him.

Achalu (2010) viewed stress as an interrelationship

between the mind and the body. Hence, a link exists between

stress and health. Stress is looked upon as a biological

response to events that threaten to overwhelm the individual

capacity to cope satisfactorily to changing situation in the

environment. Stress has been a major health problem in all

12
works of life and it is inherent in all human activities and

endeavors. This is because; the world itself is full of never-

ending array of challenges; many of which present them as

obstacles to be overcome (Boyce & Ellis, 2005).

Love, in Hinkle, (1973), noted that tress refers to internal

force generated with solid body by the action of any external

force, which tends to distort the body or the organism

concerned. There are three (3) features in this definition: First,

that stress is an internal force. Secondly, force generated is

external, that is, outside the individual, and thirdly, it is an

external force that tends to distort the body or organism. This

means that it is difficult to conceptualize stress.

Scholars perceived stress from different perspectives

based on their orientations. Selye (1976) defined stress as,

“The rate of wear and tear in human body associated with any

vital activity’’. In line with Selye (1976); Davis, Eshelonan and

Mecay (1988) stated that stress is the wear and tear in human

bodies’ experience, as they adjust to their continually changing

environment. This has physical and emotional effects on them

and can create positive or negative feelings.

13
Stress as a positive/eustress influence, can help compel

an individual to take action. It can result in a new awareness

and exciting new perspectives. For instance, positive events

such as, getting married, buying a house, getting admission or

receiving promotion. On the other hand, stress as a

negative/distress influence can lead to feeling of distrust,

rejection, anger and depression which can lead to health

problems such as headache, stomach upset, rashes, insomnia,

high blood pressure, heart disease, stroke, aches and pains.

Ngwoke Omeje (2002), stated that, stress is any condition

that disturbs the normal functioning of psychological levels. In

support of this assertion, Ellen, Melinta, Lisa, Heather and

Jean (2007), asserted that stress is a psychological and

physiological response to events that upset on individual’s

balance in some ways. These demands or events are called

stressors.

Teachers’ Stress, Strain and Burnout

Teachers’ stress is described as any characteristic of the

school environment that poses a threat to the teacher (Sutton,

1984). The impact of teacher stress depends upon an

14
individual’s social supports, personality characteristics and job

satisfaction (Guglielmi & Tatrow, 1998).

Two types of stress can ultimately affect teachers: Task

based stress-such as dealing with disruptive students, refers

to problems that are associated with a variety of specific tasks

that teachers must perform in their teaching role. Role based

stress- such as the absence of sufficient resources to perform

adequately, refers to how teachers’ expectations of their role fit

in with the actual work-related responsibilities needed to fulfill

their role (Pettigrew &Wolf, 1982). Stress within teaching is

driven by the organizational factors related to the way in which

teachers are expected to work (Hepburn & Brown, 2001).

Organizational factors that contribute to teacher stress

can include unreasonable directed time budgets, excessive

paperwork, unrealistic deadlines and intimidating inspection

regimes (Hepburn & Brown, 2001). A teacher’s personality is a

factor when explaining the amount of stress that is present.

Teachers’ skills, motives, and perceptions of their environment

determine the amount of stress that may take place (Guglielmi

& Tatrow, 1998). A teacher who does not have a conflict

between personal values and those of educational authorities

15
has a high ambition to succeed professionally, and is not

easily upset or excited; tend to experience the last amount of

stress (Bachkirova, 2005). Teacher stress is closely linked to

strain and burnout.

Strain is any unpleasant behavioral psychological, or

physiological out come in a teacher (Sutton, 1984). In general,

strain is the result of an interaction between a person and

their environment. Burnout is the emotional, mental and

physical exhaustion that comes about from job-related stress

and roughly describes any negative responses by teachers to

work-related stress (Blasé, 1982). Teachers who are idealistic

and enthusiastic are most vulnerable to burnout (Farber,

1991). Buffers for burnout include social support, sense of

control, and dietary habits (Guglielmi & Tatrow, 1998).

Burnout tends to occur when effort and coping resources fail

to overcome stress, and stems from an individual perception of

a significant discrepancy between effort and reward (Farber,

1991). It is characterized by depersonalization and a decline in

personal achievement.

A burnout cycle begins when teachers show a decrease in

effort and major values outcomes, and an increase in job

16
strain. Burnout is the end state of “burning out”, which is the

gradual attrition of important technical psychological and

social resources (Blasé, 1982). Teachers can be considered

burnout if they show attitudes that depersonalize

pupils/students, as well as exhibiting low levels of personal

accomplishments in their work (Hastings&Bham,2003).

Burnout leads teachers to experience an increase in

absenteeism, and a high desire to want to leave the teaching

profession (Hastings & Bham, 2003).

Causes of Teachers Stress

Teacher stress can be caused from variety situations.

Stress often comes about when teachers have difficult

negotiating various aspects of interactions with students

(Hepburn & Brown, 2001) or from any circumstances that are

considered too demanding, depriving of time, and interfering

with instruction (Blasé, 1986). Stress can best be explained by

categorizing factors into first and second order stressors. First

order stressors directly interfere with teacher effort and can

include student apathy, student disruption or discipline, poor

student attendance, high student to teacher ratio (Large

classes), paperwork, prep-work, irresponsible colleagues,

17
obstructive supervisors, lack of effective leadership such as

principals or vice principals, head teachers, and seemingly

non-supportive parents. Stressors that occur must frequently

tend to be organizational issues dealing with students,

administration, other teachers, and other work relationships

(Blasé, 1986). Second order stressor do not interfere directly

with teacher effort and can include issues such as how

salaries, emotional fatigue, frustration, helplessness,

stagnation, boredom and loss of motivation or enthusiasm

(Blasé, 1986).

Stress among teachers can also be grouped into three

categories: Role demands, instructional problems, and

interpersonal relationship (Sutton, 1984). Role rated stress is

said to be the difference between teachers’ role expectations

and their actual experiences within that role (Pettegrew & Wolf,

1982). Role demand stressors include ambiguity, overload,

conflict (Sutton, 1984), preparedness, and non-participation

(Pettegrew & Wolf, 1982). Organizational characteristics such

as policies, structure, and processes can also be categorized as

role demand stressors (Bacharach, Bauer & Conley, 1986).

Instructional problems or task stress identifies problems

18
associated with a variety of specific tasks that teachers must

perform in their teaching role (Pettegrew & Wolf, 1982).

Instructional problems can include difficulties with student

discipline, competence, inappropriate procedures for student

placements, instruction, inadequate standardized tasks,

grading systems (Sutton, 1984), notification of unsatisfactory

work performance, being physically threatened by students

(Pettegrew & Wolf, 1982). And sparse or dangerous working

conditions (Bacharach, Bauer, & Conley, 1986). Interpersonal

relationships refer to relationships teachers have with fellow

professionals or community members within the educational

environment. Network interaction and supervision may also

fall into this category (Bacharach, Bauer & Conley, 1982). The

most common stressors in this group are conflict with other

staff members, and a lack of social support from supervisors

and coworkers (Sutton, 1984).

Causes of teacher stress can also be broken down into

environmental and individual stressor. Most stressors that can

be found in the work environment include: Unfavorable

working conditions, heavy workloads, organizational problems,

paucity of resources, lack of support and or autonomy, and

19
decision making. The work environment can also include

physical stressors such as task-related notice, crowding, the

size of the classroom and or school, safety or youth violence,

as well as administrative pressure such as support from

managers and role ambiguity (Hastings & Bham, 2003).

Individual characteristics include the unique attributes of

teaches such as personality, age, gender, demographic

background, the ability to establish and maintain supportive

networks, cognitive evaluation of stressors, the ability to cope,

type of teacher, and job dissatisfaction (Guglielmi & Tatrow,

1998). Individual stress can also be associated with the

compatibility between personal and educational values,

ambition to succeed, sensitivity threshold, competitiveness,

multiple roles for female, teachers (such as parent, caretaker,

homemaker and teacher), and perfection (Bachkirova, 2005).

A major source of teacher stress can be directly

attributed to the students. Through survey and interview

responses, teachers most commonly refer to students as being

responsible for most of their stress (Hastings & Bham, 2003).

Stress resulting from student discipline is associated with

teachers having to play the different roles of baby sitters,

20
police officers, or even harsh authoritarians, which can cause

role demand overload (Blasé, 1986). Most teachers view

disrespectful behaviour, student attentiveness, and sociability

as the most stressful student misbehaviours, (Hastings &

Bham, 2003). Griffith, Steptoe, and Cropley (1999) found that

primary classroom teachers suffer more stress than secondary

teachers. Primary school teachers are responsible for one class

throughout the entire school year which makes teachers not

only responsible for educational activities, but for moral and

social development as well. More responsibilities, along with

work pressure and student misbehavior, cause primary

classroom teachers to have the highest level of stress. These

behaviours along with student discipline management; student

apathy, student achievement, and student absence all result

in teachers experiencing increased stress (Blasé, 1986).

Symptoms of Stress among Teachers

Many scholars from different perspectives made

highlights of manifestations of stress, relating to people’s

occupation. These manifestations are called symptoms of

stress.

21
Teaching stress manifests in a situation which evokes

psychological response in form of anxiety, tension, panic, a

feeling of sense of insecurity and loss of self-confidence.

(Iketuonye, 1993) and (Dada, 2010), identified three types of

stress symptoms which are physical, emotional and mental.

Physical manifestation of stress in individuals is associated

with tension, headache, restlessness, fatigue or general body

tiredness, blurred vision, muscle twitches, reduce libido,

increase in blood pressure, change in heart beats, dizziness,

trembling, and perspiration among others. Emotional reaction

according to Iketuonye include: fear, nervousness, worry,

irritability, loss of voice, aggressiveness, intolerance,

nightmares and being upset.

Mental stress symptoms identified include: boredom, or

mental tiredness, poor concentration, disturbing thoughts and

poor performance in problem solving tasks. In line with

Iketonye, Dunham (1992), Oboegbulam (2004), Fremont

(2003), and Ellen, Melinda, Heather and Jean (2007), identified

four major groups of

stress symptoms namely: emotional/feelings, mental/cognitive

/intellectual, physical and behavioral.

22
 Emotional stress symptoms: The stress victim feels

moody and hypertensive, depressive, urge to laugh or cry

at inappropriate times, embarrassment, anger and

anxiety.

 Mental/cognitive/ intellectual stress symptoms:

These depict how stress affects one’s mind. These

symptoms are noticeable in individuals experiencing

memory stress problem such as, inability to concentrate

and negative world view among others.

 Physical/stress symptoms: The following symptoms are

indicators of physical stress – headaches, digestive

problems, muscle tension and pain, sleep disturbances,

constipation eating disorders, weakness, nausea, asthma,

shortness of breath, decrease sex drive and fatigue

among others.

 Behavioral stress symptoms: These symptoms are

associated with eating more/less, isolating oneself from

others, neglecting ones responsibilities, increasing

alcohol and drug intakes, agitation, nervous habits, such

as nail biting, self-pacing, teeth grinding, or jaw

clenching, overreacting to unexpected problems.

23
This study therefore reveals that stress affects the mind,

body and behavior. The scientific signs and symptoms of stress

vary from one person to another. Nevertheless, all have the

same potential to negatively impinge on the health and

emotional well-being of individuals.

There are other symptoms of stress due to job-related

demands on an individual. Capel (1987) indicated that, when

job-related demands and stress are excessive, there could be

varieties of possible symptoms. Burnout is identified as one

type of chronic response to the cumulative long term negative

impact of work stress. This can be manifested in workers,

emotionally detached from their jobs and may ultimately cause

them to leave their job. Capel pointed on the three most

common effects of burnout as; emotional exhaustion,

depersonalization, and low personal accomplishment. He

further noted that stress and its effects have negative impact

on teachers and students they teach.

A teacher who is experiencing progressive dissatisfaction

exhibits symptoms of stress which colleagues and students

can observe. This include: fatigue, depression, general lack of

resilience, no sense of humor, difficulty –being organized, no

24
time to listen to anyone and frequent illness (Matthew, 1990

and Jarvis, 2002).

Stress Management Strategies

Dealing with problems or difficulties in a calm and

appropriate manner is commonly referred to as management

strategies (www.dictionary.com, 2017). How a teacher copes

with stress in the school environment affects the impact of

stress on their psychological well-being and their psychological

response (Griffith, Steptoe, & Cropley, 1999). Coping behaviors

or resources come in the form of physical, psychological,

social, or material factors and help teachers overcome job-

related stressors and achieve their valued outcomes with

students (Blasé, 1982).

Boekaerts (1994) identified two ways of dealing with

stress as: problem-focused coping and emotional-focused

coping. Problem-focused coping refers to the efforts made by

individual to act on the source of the stress, while the

emotional-focused coping is all about the efforts to reduce the

emotional distress by moving away from the source, either

actually or mentally. Problem-focused coping is called

“Approach”, while emotional-focused coping is called

25
“Avoidance”. The approach ways of managing stress are

applied when the stressors are of long-term, while the

avoidance ways of coping are used when the stressors are of

the short-term.

Another way of managing stress is by organizing Staff

Professional Development Program (Oboegbulem, 2004).

Oboegbulem elaborated that, Staff Professional Program as a

type of stress management technique help teachers acquired

knowledge and skills to discharge their duties more effectively

and efficiently. She posited that, teachers at times are

confronted with problems because their training and

orientation do not give them enough preparation. However, she

added that certain stressors could be prevented or avoided if

teachers were well remunerated, equipped, knowledgeable and

skillful in practicing their professions.

Common positive strategies teachers use to alleviate

stress include: exercise, social resources, avoidance, reading,

hobbies, movement and meditation (Gulivadi, 2006). These

coping strategies used by teachers affect their outlook on the

situation, thereby altering the perception of stress (Griffith,

Steptoe, & Cropley, 1999). To alter the perception of stress,

26
teachers may invoke inward coping strategies. Inward

strategies such as concentrating on something narrow in the

field of stimuli around oneself, including seeking stillness and

focus. Outward strategies such as exercise, involve seeking

connections, distractions, and movement (Gulwadi, 2006).

Although, there are many common coping strategies available,

most teachers rely on social support, active planning,

restorative experiences, and suppression of competing

behaviors.

Social support can reduce the impact of stressors on

teachers’ well-being, job satisfaction, and physical illness risk.

Teachers seek support from family, friends, and colleagues in

other to receive advice, discuss feelings, get emotional support,

get sympathy and understanding, and to talk about their

feelings. Teachers who have more support within their

personal lives tend to experience less stress in the workplace

(Griffith, Steptoe, & Cropley, 1999). Active planning, although

a part of the normal workload, allows teachers to take their

mind off stress and focus on their work. The process of active

planning involves concentrating efforts, developing a plan,

taking some action, coming up with strategies, trying to take

27
steps, and doing what has to be done in order to keep their

attention on the students rather than the stressor (Griffith,

Steptoe, & Cropley, 1999).

2.2 Theoretical Review

The study was guided by Transaction Theory of stress as

reformulated by Dienstbier (1989). According to the

Transaction Theory of stress, the cognitive appraisal of stress

is a two-part process which involves a primary appraisal and

secondary appraisal. Primary appraisal involves the

determination of an event as stressful. During primary

appraisal, the event or situation can be categorized as

irrelevant, beneficial, or stressful. If the event is then evaluated

as a harm/loss, a threat, or a challenge. A harm/loss refers to

an injury or damage that has already taken place. A threat

refers to something that could produce harm or loss. A

challenge event refers to the potential for growth, mastery, or

some form of gain. Richard Lazarus (1984) argues that we

cannot assess the origins of stress by looking solely at the

nature of environmental event; rather stress is a process that

involves the interaction of the individual with the environment.

These categories are based mostly on one’s own prior

28
experience and learning. Also, each of these categories

generates different emotional responses. Threatening

stressors can produce excitement and challenging stressors

can produce excitement. This theory helps to integrate both

the motivational aspects of stress and the varying emotions

that are associated with the experience of stress. Secondary

appraisal occurs after assessment of the event as a threat or a

challenge. During secondary appraisal, the individual now

evaluates his/her coping resources and options. According to

theory of transactions, stress arises only when a particular

transaction is appraised by the person as relevant to his/her

well- being. In order for an event to be appraised as a stressor,

it must be personally relevant and there must be a perceived

mismatch between a situation’s demands and one’s resources

to cope with it.

Dienstbier (1989) asserts that when an event is appraised

as a challenge, it leads to different physiological consequences

than when it is appraised as a harm/loss or threat.

Conservation of Resources Theory

The conservation of Resources Theory was propounded

by Hobfoll (1989). According to this Theory, individual

29
accumulate resources they can apply to accommodate,

withstand, or overcome threats. They might accumulate

personal resources such as self-esteem and optimize; material

resources, such as Money; condition resources, such as status

and social support. Stressful or traumatic event consume

these resources, thereby augmenting their sensitivity to

subsequent stressors. This Theory reveals that, individual

experience stress when ever resources are depleted and

therefore potentially inadequate to resolve any impeding

demands. Particularly, when Resources deplete such as when

individuals lose money or status, they experience actual

stress. In contrast, when resources are threatened for

example, the possibility that, individuals might lose money or

status is raised. They experience a state called Anticipatory

stress; which can be as acute as actual (Hobfoll, 1989).

The relevance of this theory to the present study is that, any

situation one may find oneself; there is the tendency of being

stressed because, stress is part of life. This theory will help

acquaint teachers to engage in good coping strategies to

alternate the harmful effects of stress for their safety as well as

the continuity of teaching/learning process.

30
Cognitive Activation Theory of Stress

The Cognitive Activation Theory of Stress was

propounded by Ursni and Erikson (2004). They categorized

stress into four aspects viz; stress stimuli, stress experience,

non-specific (generic stress) response and experience response.

They called the stress response a generic alarm in homeostatic

system, producing general and unspecific neurophysiological

activation from one level of arousal to more arousal, or a threat

to homeostasis and life of the organism.

According to Ursin and Erikson, the stress response occurs

whenever something is missing, for example, there is a

homeostatic imbalance or a threat to the life of the organism.

They stated that, stress is an essential and necessary

physiological response and that the unpleasantness of the

alarm poses no health hazard. Nonetheless, when the stress

response is sustained, it may lead to illness and diseases to

the individual/victim.

This theory is relevant to the present study because, it

gives teachers the fore knowledge of the likely consequences of

sustained stress which leads to illness. Teachers can cause

this knowledge to avoid or reduce such stress related illnesses

31
by practicing good stress management strategies to avoid its

negative effects on them.

2.3 Review of Empirical Studies on Occupational Stress

and Job Satisfaction among Primary School Teachers.

Kayasthe and Kayasthe (2012) carried out a study on

teacher’s stress and job satisfaction in Higher Secondary

Schools of Napel. The purpose of the study was to determine

the relationship between stress and job satisfaction among

teachers in Napel. Five research questions and two hypotheses

guided the study. The design adopted was correlational

research design. Sample of 240 teachers were randomly

selected from the population of 2,220 teachers. The

instrument of data collection was questionnaire and data

collected was analyzed using Pearson Product Moment

Correlation.

The findings revealed that, there was a significant

relationship between teachers stress and job satisfaction. The

study is relevant to the present study in the sense that, it

examined similar variable such as stress, and differ from the

present study in the sense that previous study used higher

secondary school teachers, while the present study will use

32
primary school teachers and job satisfaction as one of the

intervening variables. Another difference is that, the previous

study was carried out in Napel while the present study will be

carried out in Obio/Akpor Local Government Area in Rivers

State.

Vandick and Wagner (2001) carried out a study on

theoretical model of teachers stress in Germany. The purpose

of the study was to determine work stress among secondary

school teachers in Germany. Four research questions and two

null hypotheses guided the study. Design of the study was

survey research design. Population of the study was 905 and

356 teachers were randomly selected. Questionnaire was used

for data collection and data collected was analyzed using

Pearson Moment Product.

The findings revealed that, work load led to stress

reaction for the teachers, whereas, principal support, belief of

self-efficacy among participants and of appropriate coping

strategies reduced their experiences of work related stress.

This study is relevant to the present study because, the study

used similar variable which is stress, but differ in the sense

that, the previous study was carried out in Germany, while the

33
present study will be carried out in Obio/Akpor Local

Government Area in Rivers State, Nigeria.

2.4 Review of Related Empirical Studies

Aralu (2009) carried out a study on sources of stress and

stress management strategies among secondary school

teachers in Onitsha. The purpose of the study was to

investigate sources of stress among secondary school teachers

in Onitsha. Descriptive survey research design was used for

the study. Four research questions and two null hypotheses

guided the study.

The population of the study was 1820 teachers, while the

sample for the study was 460 teachers. Questionnaire on

Sources of Stress and Stress Management Questionnaire for

Teachers (SSSMQT) was used for data collection. Data

collected was analyzed using ANOVA, Z-test and Schefte’s post

hoc test; were used to test the stated hypotheses.

This study is relevant to the present study because, it

focused on stress-management strategies as a variable which

the present study is going to use also, they also use survey

design.

34
The only difference is that, the study was carried out in

Onitsha among secondary school students while the present

study is going to be carried out in Port Harcourt among public

primary school teachers.

2.5 Summary of Review of Related Literature

The literature reviewed was presented from the

conceptual, theoretical and empirical perspectives.

From the conceptual perspective, stress is said to be the

response of the body as a result of pressure mounted on it

from the environment. Work related stress is reported to

manifest in situation that evokes, psychological responses in

the form of anxiety, tension, feeling of frustration,

hopelessness and panic.

Role ambiguity, role conflict, work overload were depicted


to be some of the causes of stress. Others are poor
performance incentives, poor salary, poor health, inadequate
classroom among others. These pose adverse effects on
abilities of teachers to effectively perform in the classroom.
The review of literature also includes some empirical

studies on occupational stress on job satisfaction, stressors

that impinge on teachers’ gender, location and stress

management of teachers.

35
CHAPTER THREE

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

This chapter presents the method that would be used in

the study. It is organized under the following subheadings:

Research design, area of the study, population of the study,

sample and sampling techniques, instrument for data

collection, validation of the instrument, reliability of the

instrument, method for data collection and method for data

analysis.

3.1 Research Design

The design for this study is descriptive survey design

which seeks to investigate the stress management strategies

adopted by public primary school teachers in Obio/Akpor

Local Government Area of Rivers State. The rational for using

descriptive survey design is in line with Nworgu (2006) who

stated that, descriptive survey design is the process through

which a group of people or items is studied by collecting and

analyzing data from only a few people or items considered to

be representative of the entire group. It is concerned with

conditions that exist, practices that prevail, beliefs, point of

view or attitudes that are held and processes that are ongoing.

36
3.2 Area of the Study

The area of this study is Obio/Akpor Local Government

Area of Rivers State. There are 62 communities that make up

Obio/Akpor Local Government Area with 53 public primary

schools (source: Geographic information system(GIS)

Assessment of land use and land cover charges in Obio/Akpor

L.G.A, Rivers State, Nigeria,(PDF).Maxwellsci.com.Retrieved,

16th August, 2016).This area was chosen because, the

researcher observed that, public primary school teachers in

this Local Government Area are passing through stressful

situations resulting in the L.G.A, losing professional teachers

for less stressful occupation.

3.3 Population of the Study

The population for this study is 793 public primary

school teachers in 53 public primary schools across the L. G.

A. (Source: Rivers State Universal Basic Education Board

(RSUBEB), 2018).

3.4 Sample and Sampling Techniques

The sample size for the study was 250 public primary

school teachers; among which were 16 males and 234 females

drawn from 793. The sample size constituted 31.5% of the

37
total population. Multi-stage sampling procedure was adopted

for this study. Stage one; simple random sampling technique

was used to select 30 communities in the Local Government

Area, namely: Alakahia, Choba, Egbelu, Elelenwo, Eneka,

Ogbogoro, Ozuoba, Rukpokwu, Rumudara, Rumueme,

Rumuigbo, Rumukalagbor, Rumuobiakani, Rumuokparali,

Rumuokwurusi, Rumuolumeni, Rumuodomaya, Rumuokoro,

Rumuokwachi, Rumuokwuta, Rumuola, Rumuolaogu,

Rumuomasi, Rumuomoi, Rumuosi, Rumuorlu, Rumuwaji,

Rumuwegwu, Trans-Amadi and Woji. Stage two; 25 schools

were selected from the sampled communities. Stage three; 10

teachers were randomly selected from each of the sampled

schools, to enable equal representation of teachers across the

board.

3.5 Instrument for Data Collection

One instrument was used for data collection. The

instrument is titled “Teachers’ Stress Management Strategies

Questionnaire (TSMSQ)”. The instrument TSMSQ was

developed by the researcher from reviewed literature and it has

four Sections “A” “B” “C” “D”. Section A: deals with the

demographic data. Section B: deals with potential sources of

38
teachers stress. Section C: deals with the effects of stress on

teachers, while Section D: contains information on teachers’

stress management strategies.

Section B, is subdivided into three Clusters: B 1, B 2, and

B3. Cluster B 1 has 5 items on financial factors as source of

teachers’ stress. Cluster B 2, deals with pupils’ factors as

source of teacher’s stress which has 8 items. Cluster B 3, deals

with administrative factors as source of teachers’ stress with

10 items. These have responses of Yes or No, rated as, (YES)-1,

(NO)- 0.

Section C, is divided into two clusters: C 1 and C2. Cluster

C1 has 7 items on health, while cluster C 2 has 7 items on

performance. These have responses of YES or NO, rated as,

(YES) -1, (NO) - 0.

Section D, has 1 cluster on stress management strategies

adopted by teachers, with 18 items. This has responses of 4

points modified as rating scale which are: Strongly Agree (SA),

Agree (A), Disagree (D), and Strongly Disagree (SD), rated as

(SA) – 4, (A) – 3, (D) – 2, (SD) – 1.

39
3.6 Validity of the Instrument

To ensure validity of instrument, draft of the

questionnaire would be presented to the researcher’s

supervisor and other lecturers in the study centre considered

knowledgeable in the area of study. After a careful study of the

instrument, observations made will be used to modify the

research instrument for its face and content validity.

3.7 Reliability of the Instrument

To test the reliability of the research instrument, the

researcher adopted and used the test –retest procedure. By the

procedure, 12 copies of the research instrument were

administered on 6 selected public primary schools outside the

sample location. Retrieval was made after four days and fresh

copies of the same instrument were re-administered to the

same public primary schools after two weeks interval. The

responses from the two administrations were correlated using

Pearson product moment correlation. The questionnaire had

reliability co-efficient of 0.87 indicating that it is reliable for

the study.

40
3.8 Method of Data Collection

In order to get responses from the teachers in public

primary schools in Obio/Akpor L.G.A, Rivers State, the

structured questionnaires were administered on the teachers

from the sampled schools directly by the researcher.

The answered copies of the questionnaires were also

collected by the researcher and none was rejected or lost.

Hence, a retrieval of one hundred percentages (100% ) was

achieved.

3.9 Method of Data Analysis

The collected data were thoroughly examined and

checked for completeness. The data were summarized, coded

and tabulated. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS)

application software was used to analyze the data via

descriptive statistics. Research questions 1 and 2 were

analyzed using frequencies: f y = ∑Yes, fn = ∑No; and

∑ ∑
percentages: (%)y = x100, (%)n = x100. Where fy =

frequency of Yes responses, ∑Yes = sum of Yes responses, f n =

frequency of No responses, ∑No = sum of No responses, (% )y =

percentage of Yes responses, (%)n = percentage of No

responses; and N = sample size (250). A benchmark of 50%

41
was used to analyze the results; items with response scores of

50% and above were accepted, while items with response

scores below 50% were rejected. Research questions 3 – 5 were

analyzed using means ( =∑ ), and standard


deviations (s = . Where SA, A, D, and SD

are Strongly Agreed, Agreed, Disagreed and Strongly Disagreed

responses respectively; and N = sample size(s). A criterion

mean of 2.50 was used to analyze the results; items with mean

values of 2.50 and above were adopted, while items with mean

values below 2.50 were rejected. Also, research question 6 was


analyzed using means ( = , and standard deviations


(s = ). Where Yes and No are responses of

participants, and N = sample size(s). A criterion mean of 0.50

was used to analyze the results; items with mean scores of

0.50 and above were taken to be Yes, while items with mean

scores below 0.50 were taken to be No. Finally, the three null

hypotheses were evaluated using independent t-test analysis (t


= ; where = ), and probability value (p)

at 0.05 levels of significance. A critical t-value of 1.96 was


42
used to determine the validity of the null hypotheses; items

with t-value below 1.96 were considered Not Significant, while

items with t-value above 1.96 were considered Significant.

43
CHAPTER FOUR

DATA PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION

The results of the data collected and analyzed for the

research questions and hypotheses are presented in this

chapter. The findings of the study; based on the results, are

discussed in-line with the research questions and null

hypotheses that guided the study.

4.1 Research Question One

What are the key sources of stress among teachers in public

primary schools in Obio/Akpor L.G.A., Rivers State?

Table 1: Frequencies and percentages of key sources of


stress among public primary school teachers in
Obio/Akpor L.G.A
N = 250 YES NO
S/N Potential Sources of
Teacher Stress Valid Missing fy (%)y fn (%)n
Financial Factors
1 Are you paid in time? 250 None 76 30.4 174 69.6
2 Do you receive adequate 250 None 92 36.8 158 63.2
payment for your work?
3 Is your yearly increment rate 250 None 3 1.2 247 98.8
regularly paid?
4 Is there any provision for 250 None 1 0.4 249 99.6
overtime allowance?
5 Have you been paid your 250 None 17 6.8 233 93.2
promotion arrears?
Pupils’ Factors
6 Do you have noisy Pupils in 250 None 180 72 70 28
your class?
7 Do Pupils absent themselves 250 None 219 87.6 31 12.4
without your permission?
8 Do Pupils comply adequately 247 3 183 74.1 64 25.9
with take home assignments?

44
9 Are there enough textbooks 250 None 207 82.8 43 17.2
for your Pupils?
10 Do Pupils exhibits poor 250 None 34 13.6 227 86.4
attitudes towards classroom
tasks?
11 Do Pupils litter the classroom 250 None 215 86 35 14
every school day?
12 Do Pupils comply with 249 1 229 92.0 20 8.0
correct use of school
uniforms?
13 Are Pupils always late to 250 None 43 17.8 207 82.2
class?
Administrative Factors
14 Are you duly promoted? 250 None 38 15.2 212 84.8
15 Are you frequently 249 1 0 0.0 249 100
transferred?
16 Do you have over crowded 250 None 152 60.8 98 39.2
Pupils in your class?
17 Is your classroom ill- 250 None 64 25.6 186 74.4
furnished?
18 Are you satisfied with your 250 None 241 96.4 9 3.6
job generally?
19 Do you think you have more 250 None 149 59.6 101 40.4
school-work than you should
have?
20 Are you satisfied with your 250 None 152 60.8 98 39.2
physical working
environment?
21 Are you satisfied with your 250 None 46 18.4 204 81.6
level of involvement in the
decision-making processes?
22 Are you satisfied with the 250 None 97 38.8 153 61.2
overall management structure
of the school/unit?
23 Do you think that the 250 None 104 41.6 146 58.4
opportunities to progress and
develop through training are
fair to everyone?

The result in Table 1 shows the frequencies and

percentages of respondents on key sources of stress among

public primary school teachers in Obio/Akpor L.G.A, Rivers

45
State. The result showed that the following sources of stress

are prevalent among teachers in the study area.

On financial factors as sources of teachers stress, the result

indicated that; irregular payment (174, 69.6% ), inadequate

salary (158, 63.2%), nonpayment of yearly increment rate

(247, 98.8%), nonpayment of over time allowances (249,

99.6% ) and nonpayment of promotion arrears (233, 93.2% ) are

sources of stress among teachers.

On pupils’ factors as sources of teachers stress, the

result showed that; noise making in the class (180, 72%),

pupil’s absenteeism (219, 87.6%) and pupils littering the

classroom every school day (215, 86%) are sources of teachers

stress. However, the respondents disagreed that pupils’

lateness to class (207, 82.2% ) is a source of stress.

Finally, on administrative factors as sources of teachers

stress, the respondents agreed that the following are sources

of stress to them, these include; irregular promotion (212,

84.8% ), overcrowded pupils in one class (152, 60.8% ), bulky

class-work (149, 59.6% ), frequent changes in school policies

and procedures (204, 81.6%), autocratic leadership style (the

head imposes command on subordinates) in the school (153,

46
61.2% ), and little or no provision for teachers’ development

programme by management (such as in-service training) -

(146, 58.4% ).

4.2 Research Question Two


What are the perceived effects of stress on teachers in public
primary schools in Obio/Akpor L.G.A?
Table 2: Frequencies and percentages of perceived effects
of stress on teachers in public primary schools in
Obio/Akpor L.G.A
N = 250 YES NO
S/N Effects of Stress on Teachers
Effects of Stress on Teachers’ Valid Missing fy (%)y fn (%)n
Health
1 Do you have persisted headaches 250 None 2 0.8 248 99.2
and migraines?
2 Do you feel anxious and nervous 250 None 0 0.0 250 100
at work?
3 Do you sweat profusely at work? 250 None 1 0.4 249 99.6
4 Have you previously had time 250 None 23 9.2 227 90.8
off work because of ill-health,
which you think was caused by
stress at work?
5 Do you feel your health 250 None 0 0.0 250 100
(physically/mentally) is being
affected by your work?

6 Do you often feel depressed at 248 2 3 1.2 245 98.8


work?
7 Do you frequently feel dizzy at 250 None 7 2.8 243 97.2
work?
Effects of Stress on Teachers’
Performance
8 Does stress have a negative 250 None 1 0.4 249 99.6
impact on your performance?
9 Do you often feel stressed and 250 None 12 4.8 238 95.2
fatigued at work?
10 Do you work under pressure? 246 4 5 2.0 241 98.0
11 Are you prone to negative 250 None 0 0.0 250 100

47
thinking about your job?
12 Do you think that your job 250 None 0 0.0 250 100
security is not guarantee due to
low performance caused by
stress-related factors?
13 Do you find it difficult to 250 None 16 6.4 234 93.6
concentrate?
14 Do you like your current job? 250 None 247 98.8 3 1.2

The result in Table 2 showed that the respondents

disagreed on all items listed by the researcher for possible

effects of job-related stress on their health and performance.

On the other hand, the result of the study had equally shown

that 98.8% of the sampled teachers agreed that they are in

loved with their teaching job.

4.3 Research Question Three


What are the stress management strategies adopted by
teachers in public primary schools in Obio/Akpor L.G.A?
Table 3: Mean, standard deviation and mode of
respondents on stress management strategies adopted by
teachers in public primary schools in Obio/Akpor L.G.A
Item Statements N = 250
S/N I manage my stress Valid Missing Mean Std. D Mode Decision
when I;
1 Think objectively about 250 None 3.48 0.50 3 A
the stressful situation
2 Planned ahead and 250 None 3.87 0.34 4 SA
manage my time well
3 Don’t correct or monitor 250 None 2.51 0.70 3 A
every single Pupil
4 Try to get adequate sleep 249 1 3.82 0.39 4 SA
5 Avoid situations that 250 None 3.22 0.41 3 A
cause me stress
6 Seek support from my 250 None 2.55 0.75 3 A
colleagues
7 Develop positive feelings 250 None 3.37 0.48 3 A
towards stress-related

48
tasks
8 Listen to radio programs 250 None 1.82 0.58 2 D
9 Engage in regular 249 1 1.77 0.54 2 D
exercise
10 Develop positive attitude 250 None 3.66 0.48 4 SA
towards my work
11 Avoid confrontation with 250 None 3.24 0.43 3 A
colleagues
12 Make relaxation a 250 None 2.63 0.48 3 A
routine
13 Prioritize things that 250 None 3.38 0.49 3 A
keep me happy
14 Increase my alcohol 244 6 1.06 0.29 1 SD
intake
15 Make a SHORT "Must 250 None 3.23 0.42 3 A
Do" and "May Do" list for
myself
16 Don’t over commit 244 6 2.95 0.46 3 A
myself with class work
17 Plan time every 250 None 3.21 0.41 3 A
week/day to enjoy
something that is not
remotely related to
teaching
18 Spent sometimes every 249 1 3.63 0.48 4 SA
day to relax myself
(aside break time)
Key: SA = Strongly Agreed; A = Agreed; D = Disagreed; and SD
= Strongly Disagreed.

The result presented in Table 3 showed the mean,

standard deviation and mode of respondents on stress

management strategies adopted by teachers of public primary

schools in Obio/Akpor L.G.A, Rivers State. The result showed

that items 1 – 7, 10 – 13, and 15 – 18 had mean scores above

2.50, which is the criterion level of acceptance for each item.

Thus, the respondents agreed on those items as effective stress

management strategies. However, items 8, 9, and 14 had mean

49
scores below 2.50; which mean the respondents are in doubt

on the effectiveness of those items in stress management.

4.4 Research Question Four


What is the influence of gender on stress management
strategies adopted by teachers in public primary schools in
Obio/Akpor L.G.A?

Table 4: Means, standard deviations and modes of male


and female respondents on stress management strategies
adopted by teachers in public primary schools in
Obio/Akpor L.G.A
Item Statements Male (N = 16) Female (N = 234)
N/S I manage my stress Mean Std. Mode Dec. Mean Std. Mode Dec.
when I; D D
1 Think objectively 3.31 0.48 3 A 3.49 0.50 3 A
about the stressful
situation
2 Planned ahead and 3.75 0.45 4 SA 3.88 0.33 4 SA
manage my time well
3 Don’t correct or 2.94 0.57 3 A 2.49 0.54 2 D
monitor every single
Pupil
4 Try to get adequate 3.38 0.50 3 A 3.82 0.38 4 SA
sleep
5 Avoid situations that 3.13 0.34 3 A 3.22 0.41 3 A
cause me stress
6 Seek support from 1.88 0.50 2 D 2.59 0.50 3 A
my colleagues
7 Develop positive 3.25 0.45 3 A 3.38 0.49 3 A
feelings towards
stress-related tasks
8 Listen to radio 3.38 0.72 4 SA 1.82 0.57 2 D
programs
9 Engage in regular 2.19 0.66 2 D 1.76 0.54 2 D
exercise
10 Develop positive 3.31 0.48 3 A 3.67 0.47 4 SA
attitude towards my
work
11 Avoid confrontation 3.19 0.40 3 A 3.25 0.43 3 A
with colleagues
12 Make relaxation a 2.69 0.48 3 A 2.64 0.48 3 A
routine
13 Prioritize things that 3.44 0.51 3 A 3.37 0.48 3 A

50
keep me happy
14 Increase my alcohol 1.19 0.40 1 SD 1.08 0.28 1 SD
intake
15 Make a SHORT 3.25 0.45 3 A 3.23 0.42 3 A
"Must Do" and "May
Do" list for myself
16 Don’t over commit 2.50 0.63 3 A 2.52 0.69 3 A
myself with class
work
17 Plan time every 3.25 0.45 3 A 3.21 0.40 3 A
week/day to enjoy
something that is not
remotely related to
teaching
18 Spent sometimes 3.50 0.52 3 A 3.64 0.48 4 SA
every day to relax
myself (aside break
time)
Key: SA = Strongly Agreed; A = Agreed; D = Disagreed; SD =
Strongly Disagreed; and Dec. = Decision

The result presented in Table 4 showed the means and

standard deviations of male and female respondents on stress

management strategies adopted by teachers in public primary

schools in Obio/Akpor Local Government Area of Rivers State.

The result showed that male teachers agreed on items 1 – 5, 7,

8, 10 – 13, and 15 – 18. While the female teachers agreed on

items 1, 2, 4 – 7, 10 – 13, and 15 – 18. The result also

indicated that both male and female teachers disagreed on

items 9 and 14. However, they took different positions on

items 3, 6 and 8. On item 3, male teachers agreed that stress

could be managed when they don’t correct or monitor every

single pupil; while the female teachers believed that correcting

51
or monitoring every pupil imposes no stress on them. On item

6, male teachers doubted the effectiveness of “seeking support

from colleagues” in managing stress; while their female

counterpart believed that seeking support from colleagues is a

good strategy in stress management. Finally, on item 8, male

teachers strongly agreed that stress could be alleviated

through listening to radio programs; while the female teachers

disagreed on the usefulness of listening to radio programs in

managing stress.

4.5 Research Question Five

What is the influence of age on stress management strategies


adopted by teachers in public primary schools in Obio/Akpor
L.G.A?

Table 5: Means, standard deviations and modes of


respondents between the ages of 25–39 years and 40–55
years on stress management strategies adopted by
teachers in public primary schools in Obio/Akpor L.G.A
S/N Item Statements 25 – 39 years (N = 155) 40 – 55 years (N = 95)
I manage my stress Mean Std. Mode Dec. Mean Std. Mode Dec.
when I; D D
1 Think objectively about 3.49 0.50 3 A 3.46 0.50 3 A
the stressful situation
2 Planned ahead and 3.86 0.34 4 SA 3.87 0.33 4 SA
manage my time well
3 Don’t correct or 2.91 0.42 3 A 3.01 0.50 3 A
monitor every single
Pupil
4 Try to get adequate 3.83 0.38 4 SA 3.81 0.40 4 SA
sleep
5 Avoid situations that 3.21 0.41 3 A 3.23 0.42 3 A

52
cause me stress
6 Seek support from my 2.75 0.64 3 A 2.66 0.50 3 A
colleagues
7 Develop positive 3.40 0.49 3 A 3.33 0.47 3 A
feelings towards stress-
related tasks
8 Listen to radio 2.23 0.55 2 D 1.72 0.60 2 D
programs
9 Engage in regular 1.73 0.56 2 D 1.83 0.50 2 D
exercise
10 Develop positive 3.74 0.44 4 SA 3.53 0.50 4 SA
attitude towards my
work
11 Avoid confrontation 3.25 0.44 3 A 3.23 0.42 3 A
with colleagues
12 Make relaxation a 2.67 0.47 3 A 2.57 0.50 3 A
routine
13 Prioritize things that 3.33 0.47 3 A 3.45 0.50 3 A
keep me happy
14 Increase my alcohol 1.09 0.28 1 SD 1.10 0.30 1 SD
intake
15 Make a SHORT "Must 3.22 0.42 3 A 3.24 0.43 3 A
Do" and "May Do" list
for myself
16 Don’t over commit 2.55 0.66 3 A 2.80 0.50 3 A
myself with class work
17 Plan time every 3.18 0.39 3 A 3.25 0.44 3 A
week/day to enjoy
something that is not
remotely related to
teaching
18 Spent sometimes every 3.68 0.47 4 SA 3.56 0.50 4 SA
day to relax myself
(aside break time)
Key: SA = Strongly Agreed; A = Agreed; D = Disagreed; SD =
Strongly Disagreed; and Dec. = Decision

The result presented in Table 5 showed the means,

standard deviations and modes of teachers between the ages of

25 – 39 years and 40 – 55 years on stress management

strategies in public primary schools in Obio/Akpor L.G.A. The

result showed that both age groups disagreed on items 8, 9

53
and 14; while they both agreed on all other items listed by the

researcher.

4.6 Research Question Six


What is the influence of number of pupils in a class on the
stress level of teachers in public primary schools in
Obio/Akpor L.G.A?

Table 6: Means, standard deviations and modes of


respondents on the stress level of teachers based on
number of pupils in a class in public primary schools in
Obio/Akpor L.G.A
S/N 1 – 30 Pupils (N = 153) 31 – 50 Pupils (N = 97)
Item Statements Mean Std. Mode Dec Mean Std. Mode Dec
D D
1 Do you have noisy 0.086 0.281 0 No 0.959 0.200 1 Yes
Pupils in your class?
2 Do Pupils absent 0.686 0.466 1 Yes 0.918 0.277 1 Yes
themselves without your
permission?
3 Do Pupils comply 0.974 0.160 1 Yes 0.175 0.382 0 No
adequately with take
home assignments?
4 Are there enough 0.980 0.139 1 Yes 0.505 0.503 1 Yes
textbooks for your
Pupils?
5 Do Pupils exhibits poor 0.980 0.298 0 No 0.577 0.497 1 Yes
attitudes towards
classroom tasks?
6 Do Pupils litter the 0.209 0.408 0 No 0.907 0.292 1 Yes
classroom every school
day?
7 Do Pupils comply with 0.941 0.236 1 Yes 0.510 0.503 1 Yes
correct use of school
uniforms?
8 Are Pupils always late to 0.170 0.377 0 No 0.753 0.434 1 Yes
class?
9 Do you think you have 0.111 0.315 0 No 0.979 0.143 1 Yes
more schoolwork than
you should have?

54
The result presented in Table 6 showed the means,

standard deviations and modes of the stress levels on teachers

based on number of pupils in a class in public primary schools

in the study area. The Table shows that 153 respondents

reported to have between 1 – 30 Pupils in one class, while 97

respondents reported to have between 31 – 50 Pupils in one

class. The result indicated that teachers of the two groups

agreed concurrently on questions 2, 4 and 7; but took different

positions on questions 1, 3, 5, 6, 8 and 9. On question 2,

teachers of both groups agreed that pupils do absent

themselves without permission. On question 4, teachers of

both groups unanimously agreed that there are enough

textbooks for the pupils. While on question 7, they

acknowledge that pupils complied with correct use of school

uniforms.

4.7 Research Hypothesis One

There is no significant difference in the mean stress

management strategies scores of male and female teachers in

public primary schools in Obio/Akpor Local Government Area

of Rivers State.

55
Table 7: T-test analysis of significant difference in the
mean stress management strategies scores of male and
female teachers in public primary schools in Obio/Akpor
L.G.A, Rivers State

S/N Item Statements Male (N = 16) Female (N = 234) t-cal p-value Remark
I manage my stress Mean Std. D Mean Std. D
when I;
1 Think objectively 3.31 0.48 3.49 0.50 1.396 0.1638 NS
about the stressful
situation
2 Planned ahead and 3.75 0.45 3.88 0.33 1.486 0.1385 NS
manage my time
well
3 Don’t correct or 2.94 0.57 2.49 0.54 3.214 0.0015 S
monitor every single
Pupil
4 Try to get adequate 3.38 0.50 3.82 0.38 3.346 0.0017 S
sleep
5 Avoid situations that 3.13 0.34 3.22 0.41 0.858 0.3919 NS
cause me stress
6 Seek support from 1.88 0.50 2.59 0.50 5.495 0.0001 S
my colleagues
7 Develop positive 3.25 0.45 3.38 0.49 1.032 0.3033 NS
feelings towards
stress-related tasks
8 Listen to radio 3.38 0.72 1.82 0.57 10.406 0.0001 S
programs
9 Engage in regular 2.19 0.66 1.76 0.54 3.0366 0.0026 S
exercise
10 Develop positive 3.31 0.48 3.67 0.47 2.9603 0.0034 S
attitude towards my
work
11 Avoid confrontation 3.19 0.40 3.25 0.43 0.5422 0.5882 NS
with colleagues
12 Make relaxation a 2.69 0.48 2.64 0.48 0.4031 0.6872 NS
routine
13 Prioritize things that 3.44 0.51 3.37 0.48 0.5622 0.5745 NS
keep me happy
14 Increase my alcohol 1.19 0.40 1.08 0.28 1.4746 0.1416 NS
intake
15 Make a SHORT 3.25 0.45 3.23 0.42 0.1835 0.8546 NS

56
"Must Do" and
"May Do" list for
myself
16 Don’t over commit 2.50 0.63 2.52 0.69 0.1127 0.9103 NS
myself with class
work
17 Plan time every 3.25 0.45 3.21 0.40 0.3839 0.7014 NS
week/day to enjoy
something that is not
remotely related to
teaching
18 Spent sometimes 3.50 0.52 3.64 0.48 1.1228 0.2626 NS
every day to relax
myself (aside break
time)
df = 248; NS = Not Significant; S = Significant

Result in Table 7 shows the t-test analysis of significant

difference in the mean stress management strategies scores of

male and female teachers in public primary schools in

Obio/Akpor Local Government Area of Rivers State. The result

showed that there is a significant difference on items 3, 4, 6, 8,

9 and 10 since their probability values are less than 0.05.

However, there is no significant difference on items 1, 2, 5, 7,

11 – 18 since their probability values are greater than 0.05.

This implies that 33% of the result in Table 7 indicated

significant difference, while 67% of the result indicated no

significant difference. Therefore, on the basis of inferential

statistics; there is no significant difference in the mean stress

management strategies scores of male and female teachers in

57
public primary schools in Obio/Akpor Local Government Area

of Rivers State.

4.8 Research Hypothesis Two


There is no significant difference in the mean stress
management strategies scores of teachers with regards to age.

Table 8: T-test analysis of significant difference in the


mean stress management strategies scores of teachers
with regards to age.
S/N Item Statements 25 – 39 years 40 – 55 years t-cal p-value Remark
(N = 155) (N = 95)
I manage my stress Mean Std. D Mean Std. D
when I;
1 Think objectively 3.49 0.50 3.46 0.50 0.4605 0.6456 NS
about the stressful
situation
2 Planned ahead and 3.86 0.34 3.87 0.33 0.2282 0.8196 NS
manage my time well
3 Don’t correct or 2.91 0.42 3.01 0.50 1.6980 0.0908 NS
monitor every single
Pupil
4 Try to get adequate 3.83 0.38 3.81 0.40 0.3959 0.6925 NS
sleep
5 Avoid situations that 3.21 0.41 3.23 0.42 0.3709 0.7110 NS
cause me stress
6 Seek support from my 2.75 0.64 2.66 0.50 1.1690 0.2435 NS
colleagues
7 Develop positive 3.40 0.49 3.33 0.47 1.1134 0.2666 NS
feelings towards
stress-related tasks
8 Listen to radio 2.23 0.55 1.72 0.60 6.8732 0.0001 S
programs
9 Engage in regular 1.73 0.56 1.83 0.50 1.4264 0.1550 NS
exercise
10 Develop positive 3.74 0.44 3.53 0.50 3.4760 0.0006 S
attitude towards my
work
11 Avoid confrontation 3.25 0.44 3.23 0.42 0.3549 0.7230 NS
with colleagues
12 Make relaxation a 2.67 0.47 2.57 0.50 1.5936 0.1123 NS

58
routine
13 Prioritize things that 3.33 0.47 3.45 0.50 1.9123 0.0570 NS
keep me happy
14 Increase my alcohol 1.09 0.28 1.10 0.30 0.2667 0.7899 NS
intake
15 Make a SHORT 3.22 0.42 3.24 0.43 0.3622 0.7175 NS
"Must Do" and "May
Do" list for myself
16 Don’t over commit 2.55 0.66 2.80 0.50 3.1747 0.0017 S
myself with class
work
17 Plan time every 3.18 0.39 3.25 0.44 1.3114 0.1909 NS
week/day to enjoy
something that is not
remotely related to
teaching
18 Spent sometimes 3.68 0.47 3.56 0.50 1.9123 0.0570 NS
every day to relax
myself (aside break
time)
df = 248; NS = Not Significant; S = Significant

Result in Table 8 shows the t-test analysis of significant

difference in the mean stress management strategies scores of

teachers with regards to age in public primary schools in

Obio/Akpor Local Government Area of Rivers State. The result

showed that there is a significant difference on items 8, 10 and

16 since their probability values are less than 0.05. However,

there is no significant difference on items 1 – 7, 9, 11 – 15, 17

and 18 since their probability values are greater than 0.05.

This implies that 17% of the result in Table 8 indicated

significant difference, while 83% of the result indicated no

59
significant difference. Therefore, on the basis of inferential

statistics; there is no significant difference in the mean stress

management strategies scores of teachers with regards to age

in public primary schools in Obio/Akpor Local Government

Area of Rivers State.

4.9 Research Hypothesis Three

There is no significant difference in the mean scores of


teacher stress levels with respect to number of pupils in a
class.

Table 9: T-test analysis of significant difference in the


mean scores of teacher stress levels with respect to
number of pupils in a class.

1 – 30 Pupils 31 – 50 Pupils t-cal p-value Re-mark


S/N Item Statements (N = 153) (N = 97)
Mean Std. D Mean Std. D
1 Do you have noisy 0.086 0.281 0.959 0.200 26.6131 P<0.0001 S
Pupils in your class?
2 Do Pupils absent 0.686 0.466 0.918 0.277 4.4302 P<0.0001 S
themselves without
your permission?
3 Do Pupils comply 0.974 0.160 0.175 0.382 22.9144 P<0.0001 S
adequately with take
home assignments?
4 Are there enough 0.980 0.139 0.505 0.503 11.0457 P<0.0001 S
textbooks for your
Pupils?
5 Do Pupils exhibits 0.980 0.298 0.577 0.497 8.0160 P<0.0001 S
poor attitudes towards
classroom tasks?

60
6 Do Pupils litter the 0.209 0.408 0.907 0.292 14.6352 P<0.0001 S
classroom every
school day?
7 Do Pupils comply 0.941 0.236 0.510 0.503 9.1375 P<0.0001 S
with correct use of
school uniforms?
8 Are Pupils always late 0.170 0.377 0.753 0.434 11.2289 P<0.0001 S
to class?
9 Do you think you have 0.111 0.315 0.979 0.143 25.5097 P<0.0001 S
more schoolwork than
you should have?
df = 248; NS = Not Significant; S = Significant

Result in Table 9 shows the t-test analysis of significant

difference in the mean scores of teacher stress levels with

respect to number of pupils in a class in public primary

schools in Obio/Akpor Local Government Area of Rivers State.

The result showed that there is a significant difference on

every item in Table 9. Therefore, without doubt; there is a

significant difference in the mean scores of teacher stress

levels with respect to number of pupils in a class in public

primary schools in Obio/Akpor Local Government Area of

Rivers State.

4.10 Summary of Findings

From the data presentation and interpretation of results,

the following findings emerged:

61
1) In table 1, the findings from the study revealed that;

irregular payment, inadequate salary, nonpayment of

yearly increment rate, nonpayment of over time teaching

allowances, nonpayment of promotion arrears, noise

making in the class, pupil’s absenteeism, pupils littering

the classroom every school day, irregular promotion,

overcrowded pupils in one class, bulky class-work,

frequent changes in school policies and procedures,

autocratic leadership style (the head imposes command

on subordinates) in the school, and little or no provision

for teachers’ development programme by management

(such as in-service training) are sources of stress for

public primary school teachers in Obio/Akpor Local

Government Area of Rivers State.

2) In table 3, the respondents agreed that 15 out of 18 items

listed by the researcher are reliable stress management

strategies adopted by public primary school teachers in

the study area.

3) Both male and female respondents agreed together, that

13 out of the 18 items in table 4 are good stress

management strategies adopted by teachers in public

62
primary schools in Obio/Akpor Local Government Area of

Rivers State.

4) In table 5, the result showed that respondents of both age

groups did not differ in their opinion with regard to stress

management strategies adopted by teachers in public

primary schools in Obio/Akpor Local Government Area of

Rivers State.

5) In table 6, the findings from the study revealed that

teachers’ level of stress increases with increase in pupils’

population.

63
CHAPTER FIVE

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Summary of the Study

The aim of this study was to investigate the stress

management strategies adopted by teachers in public primary

schools in Obio/Akpor Local Government Area of Rivers State,

Nigeria. The study also examined the influence of gender and

age on stress management strategies.

The study was guided by six research questions and

three null hypotheses. Descriptive survey design was adopted.

The study population was 793 public primary school teachers

and the sample size was 250 respondents drawn from the

population by multi-stage sampling technique. The instrument

used for this study was the researcher structured; Teachers’

Stress Management Strategies Questionnaire (TSMSQ). The

data collected on sections B and C of the questionnaire were

analyzed using frequencies and percentages, while mean,

standard deviation and mode were used to analyze the data

generated on section D.

It is clear from the vast number of factors identified and

reported, that the goal of this study was achieved. Results

64
from the study have shown that financial and administrative

factors are the major sources of stress on public primary

school teachers in the study area, which would adversely affect

teachers’ performance if allowed to prevail longer.

5.2 Conclusion of the Study

Based on the findings of the study, the following

conclusions were drawn:

 The sources of stress of teachers is significant

 The respondents have positive stress management

strategies

 The difference in the mean stress management strategies

scores of male and female teachers is not significant.

Therefore gender is not a predictor of stress management

strategies.

 The difference in the mean stress management strategies

scores of young and old teachers is not significant.

Therefore age is not a predictor of stress management

strategies.

 The difference in the mean stress level scores of teachers

with and without crowded pupils is significant. Therefore

65
teachers stress level increases with increase in pupils’

population.

5.3 Implications of the Study

The findings of this study have educational implications

for Government, curriculum planners in State Universal Basic

Education Board (SUBEB), Teachers and Researchers.

The findings of this study will help the government to

plan and make funds available for adequate payment of

teachers’ salary, regular and prompt payment of salary,

promotion of teachers and timely implementation of the

promotions. These will practically reduced teachers stress to

the barest minimum and in turn encourage teachers to put in

their best in discharging their duties.

The findings also revealed that, there is need for the

curriculum planners to include stress management strategies

in the school curriculum. The study gives empirical evidence of

some detrimental stress management strategies as well as

good management strategies. This will help teachers to

practice good stress management strategies for their wellbeing

and teaching performance.

66
The result of the study also showed the need for researchers to

make further researches into stress management strategies for

teachers, so as to encourage those in the teaching profession

to remain in the profession.

5.4 Recommendations

The following recommendations were made based on the

findings of this study;

1) There is need for school administrators to review the

financial status of teachers in order to improve their

leaving condition and downturn their stress level.

2) There is need for government to sponsor teachers

through in-service training or at least provide soft loan

for the purpose of such career development programme.

3) There is need for the government to employ more

teachers in public primary schools to reduce teacher

workload which has been shown to increase teacher

stress.

4) There is need for the management of public primary

schools in Obio/Akpor Local Government Area and the

State at large to devise ways of making teachers

67
committed to their work and stay more in the teaching

profession.

5.5 Limitations of the Study

1) The researcher encountered limitations on the study due

to the reluctance of some teachers to respond to the

questionnaire; this may have affected the responses of

those teachers and subsequently the result of the study.

2) Internal activities in some of the schools visited must

have hindered the attention of some participants. This is

because; teachers were conducting examinations, which

caused some of them to rush in responding to the

questionnaire.

3) Another limitation of this study had to do with the gender

of the participants involved. This is because; 93.6% of the

participants were female as against 6.4% of male

participants. It is therefore expected that on a scale of

100% ; 93.6% responses from the female teachers may

have influenced the result of the study.

68
5.6 Suggestions for Further Research

In line with the findings of this study, the following are

recommended for further research;

1) The study should be replicated in other Local

Government Areas in Rivers State and, other States in

Nigeria.

2) Study on the impact of financial stress on teachers’

performance should be specifically carried out.

3) Further researches can focus on private primary school

teachers, as well as secondary school teachers and

tertiary institutions.

69
REFERENCES

Abel, M.H. & Sewell, J. (1999).Stress and burnout in rural and


Urban Secondary School Teachers. Journal of Education
Research, 92 (5), 257-293.

Achalu, E.I (1993). Psychological Stress Management: A


Behavioural Engineering Modeling

L.O Amusa (ed.) Sports, Sciences and Medicine. Ibadan:


Olanrewaju General Printers, pp. 50-53

Adimora, D.E., Akaneme, I.N. & Umeano, E.C. (2013).


Teachers reflected Appraisal as a Predictor of Self
Concept and Attitude to Work. Golden Research
thoughts.3(6).Retrieved from www.aygrt.isrj.net.

Agbatogun, A.O. (2010). Stress Management of Male and


Female teachers on the Use of Information and Electronic
Technologies. A Study on Stress Management.

Alan, B. (2001): The Art of Teaching: printed and bound in


Great Britain by Henry Ling LTD, Dorchester, Dorset.

Alan, H.S., Chan, K. Chen, & Elaine, Y.L. Chang (2010).


Comprehensive Investigation of Occupational Health
Problems Among Teachers. International Multi Conference
of Engineers and Computer Scientists. Vol. 111.

Anderson, V.L., Levinson, E. M., Barker, W. & Kiewra, K.R.


(1999). The Effects of Meditation on Teacher Perceived
Occupational Stress, State and Trait Anxiety, and
tournout. School Psychology Quarterly, 14 (1), 3-25.

Bachkirova, T. (2005). Teacher Stress and Personal Values: An


Exploratory study. School Psychology International, 26 (3),
340-352.

Boekaerts, N. (1994). Stress Coping and Learning. New York:


Pergamon. 101.

70
Boyce, W.T. & Ellis, B.J. (2005). Biological Sensitivity to
Context: An Evolutionary-Development Theory of the
Origins and Functions of Stress Reactivity. Development
and Psychopathology. 17, 271-301.

Buzzard, R. (1993).A practical work at Industrial Stress.


Occupational Psychology 47, 51-61

Capel, S.A. (1987). The Incidence of Influences of Stress and


Burn out in Secondary School Teachers. British Journal of
Education Psychology, 57, 279-288.

Cooper, C.L. (1986). Work Stress in White and Blue-Collar


Jobs Bulletin of the British Psychology Society 33. 109-
203

Cooper, C.L., Sloan, S.J., & Williams, S. (1998). The


Occupational Stress Indicator (OSI).Windsor: NFER
Nelson.

Dada, A. (2010). The Nation. Ogun Chief Judge, Ogunsola is


Dead. May 22, p6.

Davis, M., Eshelman, E. & McCay, M. (1988).The Relaxation


and Stress Reduction Work Book. Dakland C.A.: New
Harbinger. www.ivf.com/stress.

Denga, D.I. & Ekpo, T.N. (1994). Executive Stress: Its Rape
and Management. Calabar: Rapid Educational.

Dunhan, J. (1992). Stress in Teaching. London Routledge.

Ekpo, T.N. (1994). Female Teacher Stress: Extent, Sources and


symptoms. Journal of Higher Education, 1, (1), 7-14.

Ellen. J., Melinda, S., Lisa, F.D., Heather, L. & Jeans, S.


(2007). Stress; Signs, Symptoms, Causes and Effects.
www.helpguide.org.Retrieved on 03/04/2007.

Emily, E. & Susie, J. (2006): Gender and Sex. Institute of


Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1
9RE, U K.

71
Feldman, R.S. (2011) Essentials of Understanding Psychology
(9th Ed.)McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc, 1221 Avenue of the
Americas, New York.

Fremont, S. (2005). Managing Stress. Texas: University Health


Services. Retrieved
fromhttp://www.vtexas.edu/student/emha retrieved on
04/01/2007.

Hilgard, E.R. Atkinson, R.L. & Atkinson, R.C.


(1979).Introduction to Psychology (6th Ed)USA: Harcourt
Brace Javanovich.62

Hinkle L.E. (1993). The Concept of Stress in the Biological and


Sociological Sciences. Medicine and Man, 1,161-166.

Hobfoll, S.E. (1989). Conservation of Resources: A New Attempt


at Conceptualising Stress. America Psychologist, 44, 513-
524.

Iketuonye, A.I. (1993). Stress Management Kit. Owerri: M.


Cajee.

Irshad, A.K., Zahoor, A.W. & Aijax, A.P (2013). Occupational


Stress Among Male and Female Elementary Teachers.
International Journal of Scientific and Engineering
Research.4 (4). 15.

Jarvis, M. (2002). Teacher Stress: A Critical Review of Recent


Findings and Suggestions for Future Research.
mjarvis@tatton.ac.uk. Retrieved on 03/04/2007.

Jepson, E. & Forests. (2006). Individual Contributory Factors


in teacher stress: The Role of Achievement striving and
Occupational Commitment. British Journal of Educational
Psychology, 76, 183-197.

Kayastha, D.P. & Kayastha, R. (2012). Teachers Stress and


Job Satisfaction. Asian Journal of Management Sciences
and Education. 1. (2).

72
Kokklinos, C.M. (2007). Job Stressors. Personality and Turn-
out in Primary Schools Teachers. British Journal of
Educational Psychology 377; 299.

Kucukalic, A., Bravomehmedasis, A., & Popovic, S. (2003).


Difference in Experience of Coping of Those Who
Experience the Trauma of War and Torture and the Local
Population Medical Achieves. 57. 5-6.

Kyriacou, C. (2001). Teacher Stress Directions for Future


Research. Education Review, 53(1),27-35.

Lailawati M. (2011). Stress and Coping Strategy Among


Teachers: A Comparison Between Urban and Rural in 9th
Biennial Conference of Asian Association of Social
Psychology 2011. 28-31 July 2011.63

Larchic, R. & Chance, E. (2004).Teacher Performance and


Personal Life Stressor Implications for Urban Life School
Administrators. National Forum of Teachers Education
Journal, 14E, 19-30.

Magruder, K. & Yeager, D. (2009). The Prevalence of PTSD


Across War Eras and the Effect of Deployment on PTSD:
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Psychiatric
Annals, 39, 778-788.

Mathew, D.B. (1990). A Comparison of Burnout in Selected


Occupational Fields Guide London: Routledge.

Mgbodile; T.O. (2004). Fundamentals of Educational


Administration and Planning, Enugu Magnet Business
Enterprises.

Needle, R.H., Grifflin, T.F., Evedson, R. (1981).Occupational


Stress-Coping and Health Problems of Teachers.
The Journal of School Health. 51, 175-181.

Ngoka, G.N. (2000). Stress Management in Organisations,


University and Political Circles, Enugu: CECTA.

73
Nuogbo, R.O. (1999). Divine Solution to Stress and Stress
Related Diseases. Enugu: Blzeduco.

Nwachukwu, T.A. (1994). Handbook of Abnormal Psychology


and Education. Nsukka Chulbson.

Uloko Noah Agbeche, PG/M.ED (2015). Stress Management


Practices Among Primary School Teachers in Education Zone C
of Benue State. Department of Educational Foundations,
Faculty of Education, University of Nigeria, Nsukka.

74
TEACHERS’ STRESS MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES
QUESTIONNAIRE (TSMSQ)

The aim of this survey is to assist the School Management Team to identify the
main sources and causes of potential stress at work so that any risks to your
health, safety and wellbeing can be mitigated. You are required to provide
feedback anonymously, but please be assured that any information you do
provide will be treated confidentially.

Please Complete as Required and Return the Questionnaire upon


Completion
INSTRUCTIONS:
 Please read the questions in each section very carefully,
 Tick the box which applies,
 Please be honest in your responses.
Section A: Demographic Data
Teacher Age of No. of Pupils
Class Educational Gender Marital Status Teacher in Class
Qualification
Primary…….. ………………… Male Female Single Married …………… …………….

Section B: Potential Sources of Teachers’ Stress


S/N B1: Financial Factors YES NO Comments (if any)
1 Are you paid in time?
2 Do you receive adequate payment for your work?
3 Is your yearly increment rate regularly paid?
4 Is there any provision for overtime allowance?
5 Have you been paid your promotion arrears?
S/N B2: Pupils’ Factors YES NO Comments (if any)
6 Do you have noisy Pupils in your class?
7 Do Pupils absent themselves without your
permission?
8 Do Pupils comply adequately with take home
assignments?
9 Are there enough textbooks for your Pupils?
10 Do Pupils exhibits poor attitudes towards classroom
tasks?
11 Do Pupils litter the classroom every school day?
12 Do Pupils comply with correct use of school
uniforms?
13 Are Pupils always late to class?
S/N B3: Administrative Factors YES NO Comments (if any)
14 Are you duly promoted?
15 Are you frequently transferred?
16 Do you have over crowded Pupils in your class?
17 Is your classroom ill-furnished?
18 Are you satisfied with your job generally?
19 Do you think you have more schoolwork than you
should have?

75
20 Are you satisfied with your physical working
environment?
21 Are you satisfied with your level of involvement in the
decision-making processes?
22 Are you satisfied with the overall management
structure of the school/unit?
23 Do you think that the opportunities to progress and
develop through training are fair to everyone?

Section C: Effects of Stress on Teachers


S/N C1: Effects on Teachers’ Health YES NO Comments (if any)
1 Do you have persisted headaches and migraines?
2 Do you feel anxious and nervous at work?
3 Do you sweat profusely at work?
4 Have you previously had time off work because of ill-
health, which you think was caused by stress at
work?
5 Do you feel your health (physically/mentally) is being
affected by your work?
6 Do you often feel depressed at work?
7 Do you frequently feel dizzy at work?
S/N C2: Effects on Teachers’ Performance YES NO Comments (if any)
8 Does stress have a negative impact on your
performance?
9 Do you often feel stressed and fatigued at work?
10 Do you work under pressure?
11 Are you prone to negative thinking about your job?
12 Do you think that your job security is not
guarantee due to low performance caused by
stress-related factors?
13 Do you find it difficult to concentrate?
14 Do you like your current job?

Section D: Stress Management Strategies Adopted by Teachers


S/N I manage my stress when I; SA A D SD Suggestions (if any)
1 Think objectively about the stressful
situation
2 Planned ahead and manage my time
well
3 Don’t correct or monitor every single
Pupil
4 Try to get adequate sleep
5 Avoid situations that cause me stress
6 Seek support from my colleagues
7 Develop positive feelings towards
stress-related tasks
8 Listen to radio programs
9 Engage in regular exercise
10 Develop positive attitude towards my
work
11 Avoid confrontation with colleagues

76
12 Make relaxation a routine
13 Prioritize things that keep me happy
14 Increase my alcohol intake
15 Make a SHORT "Must Do" and "May
Do" list for myself
16 Don’t over commit myself with class
work
17 Plan time every week/day to enjoy
something that is not remotely related
to teaching
18 Spent sometimes every day to relax
myself (aside break time)
Key: SA – Strongly Agreed; A – Agreed; D – Disagreed; SD – Strongly Disagreed

77
APPENDIX

Your temporary usage period for IBM SPSS Statistics will expire in 6221 days.

GET
FILE='C:\Users\SORBARI\Documents\IBM\Data_&_Results\Stress Management Strate
gies adopted by Teachers in Public Primary Schools in Obio_Akpor L.G.A, Rivers
State, Nigeria..sav'.
DATASET NAME DataSet1 WINDOW=FRONT.
FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=ITEM_1 ITEM_2 ITEM_3 ITEM_4 ITEM_5 ITEM_6 ITEM_7 ITEM_8
ITEM_9 ITEM_10
ITEM_11 ITEM_12 ITEM_13 ITEM_14 ITEM_15 ITEM_16 ITEM_17 ITEM_18
/STATISTICS=STDDEV MEAN MODE
/ORDER=ANALYSIS.

Frequencies
[DataSet1] C:\Users\SORBARI\Documents\IBM\Data_&_Results\Stress Management Str
ategies adopted by Teachers in Public Primary Schools in Obio_Akpor L.G.A, Riv
ers State, Nigeria..sav

Statistics

Think
objectively
about the Planned ahead Don’t correct or Avoid situations
stressful and manage monitor every Try to get that cause me
situation my time well single Pupil adequate sleep stress
N Valid 250 250 250 249 250
Missing 0 0 0 1 0
Mean 3.4800 3.8680 2.5120 3.8193 3.2160
Mode 3.00 4.00 3.00 4.00 3.00
Std. Deviation .50060 .33917 .70130 .38556 .41234

78
Statistics

Develop
positive Develop
Seek support feelings positive attitude
from my towards stress- Listen to radio Engage in towards my
colleagues related tasks programs regular exercise work
N Valid 250 250 250 249 250
Missing 0 0 0 1 0
Mean 2.5480 3.3720 1.8240 1.7711 3.6560
Mode 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 4.00
Std. Deviation .75497 .48431 .58170 .53864 .47599

Statistics

Make a SHORT
Avoid Prioritize things "Must Do" and
confrontation Make relaxation that keep me Increase my "May Do" list
with colleagues a routine happy alcohol intake for myself
N Valid 250 250 250 244 250
Missing 0 0 0 6 0
Mean 3.2440 2.6320 3.3760 1.0902 3.2280
Mode 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 3.00
Std. Deviation .43035 .48323 .48535 .28701 .42038

79
Statistics

Plan time every


week/day to Spent
enjoy sometimes
something that every day to
Don’t over is not remotely relax myself
commit myself related to (aside break
with class work teaching time)
N Valid 244 250 249
Missing 6 0 1
Mean 2.9467 3.2080 3.6345
Mode 3.00 3.00 4.00
Std. Deviation .45500 .40669 .48253

Frequency Table

Think objectively about the stressful situation


Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid A 130 52.0 52.0 52.0
SA 120 48.0 48.0 100.0
Total 250 100.0 100.0

Planned ahead and manage my time well


Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid A 33 13.2 13.2 13.2
SA 217 86.8 86.8 100.0
Total 250 100.0 100.0

Don’t correct or monitor every single Pupil


Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid SD 30 12.0 12.0 12.0
D 62 24.8 24.8 36.8
A 158 63.2 63.2 100.0
Total 250 100.0 100.0

80
Try to get adequate sleep
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid A 45 18.0 18.1 18.1
SA 204 81.6 81.9 100.0
Total 249 99.6 100.0
Missing System 1 .4
Total 250 100.0

Avoid situations that cause me stress


Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid A 196 78.4 78.4 78.4
SA 54 21.6 21.6 100.0
Total 250 100.0 100.0

Seek support from my colleagues


Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid SD 22 8.8 8.8 8.8
D 87 34.8 34.8 43.6
A 123 49.2 49.2 92.8
SA 18 7.2 7.2 100.0
Total 250 100.0 100.0

Develop positive feelings towards stress-related tasks


Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid A 157 62.8 62.8 62.8
SA 93 37.2 37.2 100.0
Total 250 100.0 100.0

81
Listen to radio programs
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid SD 68 27.2 27.2 27.2
D 158 63.2 63.2 90.4
A 24 9.6 9.6 100.0
Total 250 100.0 100.0

Engage in regular exercise


Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid SD 71 28.4 28.5 28.5
D 164 65.6 65.9 94.4
A 14 5.6 5.6 100.0
Total 249 99.6 100.0
Missing System 1 .4
Total 250 100.0

Develop positive attitude towards my work


Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid A 86 34.4 34.4 34.4
SA 164 65.6 65.6 100.0
Total 250 100.0 100.0

Avoid confrontation with colleagues


Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid A 189 75.6 75.6 75.6
SD 61 24.4 24.4 100.0
Total 250 100.0 100.0

82
Make relaxation a routine
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid D 92 36.8 36.8 36.8
A 158 63.2 63.2 100.0
Total 250 100.0 100.0

Prioritize things that keep me happy


Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid A 156 62.4 62.4 62.4
SA 94 37.6 37.6 100.0
Total 250 100.0 100.0

Increase my alcohol intake


Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid SD 222 88.8 91.0 91.0
D 22 8.8 9.0 100.0
Total 244 97.6 100.0
Missing System 6 2.4
Total 250 100.0

Make a SHORT "Must Do" and "May Do" list for myself
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid A 193 77.2 77.2 77.2
SA 57 22.8 22.8 100.0
Total 250 100.0 100.0

83
Don’t over commit myself with class work
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid D 32 12.8 13.1 13.1
A 193 77.2 79.1 92.2
SA 19 7.6 7.8 100.0
Total 244 97.6 100.0
Missing System 6 2.4
Total 250 100.0

Plan time every week/day to enjoy something that is not


remotely related to teaching
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid A 198 79.2 79.2 79.2
SA 52 20.8 20.8 100.0
Total 250 100.0 100.0

Spent sometimes every day to relax myself (aside break time)

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid A 91 36.4 36.5 36.5
SA 158 63.2 63.5 100.0
Total 249 99.6 100.0
Missing System 1 .4
Total 250 100.0

84

Вам также может понравиться