Project: Upper Mai Hydroelectric Project

Subject: Isolated Asymmetrical Footing

Component: Control Building

Axial load P 7.00

Allowable bearing pressure (Pallowable) 150.00
Unit weight of soil (gsoil) 19.00
Friction angle (f) 30.00

Provided size
length l 0.45
Width w 0.45
perimeter of column 1.80
column Area 0.20
Assuming footing weight is 15% of total
axial load 15.00
load factor 1.50

a) For the Serviceability Limit State

Total design axial load 8.05

Required base area 0.05
provided Area 1.00

b) For the ultimate Limit State

Column design axial load 12.08
Earth pressure 26.83
c) Footing Parameter
Depth of foundation h 0.88
Provided depth of foundation 0.90
Depth provided 1.40
Thickness of footing D 400.00
Effective Cover for footing d' 50.00
Effective Depth d 350.00
Material Properties
Modulus of Elasticity for steel(Es) 200000.00
Characteristic
Characteristic strength
strength of
of steel (fy)
concrete 500.00
(fcu) 25.00
Shear Stress, vc
At the column face 0.02
 0.8 f cu 4.00
s shear stress within permissible limit? OK

d) width of footing A 0.05

provided B 1.50
L 0.75
A provided 1.13

Loading
Load at service state, P 12.08
Hx 0.00
Hy 0.00
Uniaxial moment,
Mx 1.00
My 0.00
Depth of footing h 0.877
Remarks: The base of the footing is located at a depth of 1.4
subjected to seasonal changes caused by alter

Footing dimensions
Area of footing, L*B 0.089
L 1.5
B 1.25

Soil Pressure, pmax,min

Assume,
Total axial load, P1 13.88625
Thickness of the footing Pad, D 0.4
Area of footing, A 1.875
Mx1 1.46
My1 0.00
Zx 0.4688
Zy 0.3906

P Mx My
  
A Z Z
Now,
Maximum soil pressure, pmax 10.51
Minimum soil pressure, pmin 4.30

REF. S N SINHA( page no. 596)

net ultimate upward soil pressure pu 15.77

width of pedestal bp 0.55
length of pedestal lp 0.55
ex 0.525
Mux pu*(0.5*L-0.5*bp)^ 2.96
Muy pu*(0.5*B-0.5*lp)^2 0.97
therefore,
Mu,max 2.96

Effective depth, d 29.715

e) Thickness of footing
Either by moment or shear
Thickness of footing based on moment
Considering singly reinforced balanced
section
Considering Length of Footing L 1.50
Net ultimate upward soil pressure Pu 2.96
Width of column based on moment bw 0.45

maximum ultimate moment per m

length Mu,max 2.96
Xu/d 0.46
d2 889.52
Therefore, d 29.82

Thickness of footing based on Shear

The effective depth of footing may be

determined considering that shear is
resisted without shear reinforcement
ONE Way Shear along length

Ultimate shear per unit length of wall at

critical section at a distance d from the
face of column Vu,max= Pu*(0.5*B-0.5*bw-d)
Vu,max= 2.96*(0.525-d)

shear strength of concrete in foundation

slab Tuc 0.29

d= Vu,max/(tuc L)
Vu,max 1.54
d= 0.004
d= 0.004
effective Depth d= 29.82
Clear Cover 40
 Diameter of reinforcement bar 12
overall Depth D 46
provided overall depth 400
Actual Effective depth d 354

ONE Way Shear Along breadth

Ultimate shear per unit length of wall at

critical section at a distance d from the
face of column Vu,max= Pu*(0.5*L-0.5*bw-d)
Vu,max= 2.96*(0.15-d)

shear strength of concrete in foundation

slab Tuc 0.29

d= Vu,max/(tuc L)
Vu,max 0.44
d= 0.002
d= 0.002
effective Depth d= 0.248
Clear Cover 40
Diameter of reinforcement bar 12
overall Depth D 46
provided overall depth 400
Actual Effective depth d 354

f) Design for moment

maximum ultimate moment per m
length Mu,max 0.832
Area of Steel Ast 5.4

mimimum Ast 902.7

Ast 903
Spacing 150
Dia 16
Area 1005.31
Check OK
Pt% 0.34

Distribution Bar 720

Spacing 150
Dia 16
Area 1005.31
Check OK
g) check for shear Pt% 0.34
For resisting shear without shear
reinforcement Vuc>Vu,max

Vu,max 0.51

K 1.1
Pt% 0.34

Tuc 0.47
Vuc 137
Check safe
kN
kN/m2
kN/m3
degrees

m
m
m
m2

kN (why 1.5?)
m 2

m2

kN
kN/m2

m
m
m
mm
mm
mm

N/mm2
N/mm2
N/mm2

N/mm2
N/mm2
 m2
m
m
m2

KN
KN.m
KN.m

KN.m
KN.m
m approx 1.40 m Take 1.4 m
ocated at a depth of 1.4m below which soil should not
changes caused by alternate wetting and drying.

m2
m 10.5132 Goal seek method is appled here

KN
m
m2
KN.m Moment due to asymetrical column and footing position is added
KN.m
m3
m3
along y
P Mx My
  
A Z Z eccentric 0.10489
Allowable 0.25
KN/m2
KN/m2 4.29875 Pmax= 9.56684
pmin= 0

KN/m2
m
m
m
KN.m/m
KN.m/m

KN.m/m

m
kN/m2
m

kN-m/m
for steel grade 500 from SP 16
mm2
mm

TWO Way Shear

KN

N/mm2 Minimum reinforcement percentage,Table 4.1,S N Sinha, Page 149

KN
m d= 4 mm
m
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm

KN

N/mm2 Minimum reinforcement percentage,Table 4.1,S N Sinha, Page 149

KN
m d= 2 mm
m
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm

kN-m/m
mm2

mm2
mm2
mm
mm
mm2

mm2
mm
mm
mm2
KN

(For D=400 mm)

N/mm2 From table 4.1

KN Vuc= k Tuc Ld
DIA
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
25
28
32
36
 1.35
1.6
0.25
1.6
0.45

on is added

along x
2 xP total
Pmax  ` 0
L
3 xBx (  e 0.20833
)
2
11.8496
 TWO Way Shear
Ultimate shear per unit length of
wall at critical section at a
distance of half-d from the face of
pedestal Vu,max= Pu*(L*B-(l+d)(b+d))
Vu,max= 2.96*(1.125-(0.45+d)*(0.45+d) βc
Ks

shear strength of concrete in

foundation slab Tuc 1.25 N/mm2 Minimun reinforcement perce

d= Vu,max/(Kstuc L)
Vu,max 1.08 KN
Perimete
r 1.35 m
d= 0.00043 m
effective Depth d= 0.00043 m
Clear Cover 30 mm
Diameter of reinforcement bar 12 mm
overall Depth D 36 mm
provided overall depth 50 mm
Actual Effective depth d 14
 1
1.5

Minimun reinforcement percentage,Table 4.1,S N Sinha, Page 149

0
Project: Upper Mai Hydroelectric Project
Subject Switchyard Foundation Design
S.N Components Self weight(Kgs)Other loadings(Kgs)
1 Main Transformer 43500
2 Lightning Arrester 110 150
3 CT 350 150
Isolater ( under Hanging) 340
4 CB 960
5 Disconnecting Switch 650 150
6 Service Transformer 1400 0
7 PT 475 150
8 TOWER 1800 50
 PROGRESS STATUS OF PROJECTS

S.No. Description

A) Chino Khola SHP - Updated Feasibility Study (1.5 months starting from Nov. 19, 20
1 Side and bottom rack intake design with bed load sluice
Dam body with stone masonry with hardstone lining at top
Settling basin - same as FSR (Feasibility Study Report); Design
2
review of stability of retaining wall
3 Pen-stock size and thickness optimization - Any updates on FSR
Omission of surge shaft - must review calculation sheet once
4
again
Anchor block and saddle support - same as FSR or any required
5
updates
6 Tunnel support optimization after having penstock and walkway
Ropeway alignment as well as top and bottom station (near
7 tunnel outlet and near to road respectively) - to be reconfirmed
and updated as required
Powerhouse and Tailrace (elevate turbine axis level such that tail
8 water could be diverted upstream to MM project tail water level
of 2147 masl)
TATUS OF PROJECTS

Status Responsibility Deadline Revised Deadline

R0 R1
months starting from Nov. 19, 2018)
Ongoing Anil
Yet to be started Anil

Ongoing Rakesh

Done Anil/Ranjita
Yet to be started Anil

Ongoing Ranjita

Yet to be started Surrendra

Ongoing Rakesh

Ongoing Ranjita