BIBLIOGRAPHY ON INTELLECTUAL HISTORY METHODOLOGIES

Compiled by Mikkel Thorup (August 2016)

Please feel free to circulate.

Any corrections or suggestions to the list can be made to idemt@cas.au.dk.

The principle for inclusion on the list is texts dealing with methodological aspects of intellectual
history and/or intellectual historians. The principle of presentation is chronology.

Journals

 Lychnos. An annual for history of ideas and science, 1936-

 Journal of the History of Ideas, 1940-
 Intellectual History Newsletter, 1979-2002
o (volumes 1985-1999 online at https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/002535665)
 History of European Ideas, 1980-
 Slagmark – tidsskrift for idéhistorie, 1983-
 ARR, 1989-
 Intellectual History Review, 1996-
 The European Legacy, 1996-
 Redescriptions, 1997-
 History of Intellectual Culture, 2001-
 Partial Answers. Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas, 2003-
 Modern Intellectual History, 2004-
 Contributions, 2005-
 Ideas in History, 2006-
 Zeitschrift für Ideengeschichte, 2007-
 Journal of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas, 2012-

1
 Erudition and the Republic of Letters, 2015-
 Intelligere: Revista de História Intelectual, 2015-

Literature

 Arthur O. Lovejoy, The Great Chain of Being. A Study of the History of an Idea, Cambridge,
Mass. & London: Harvard University Press 1936
 Arthur O. Lovejoy, “The Historiography of Ideas”, Proceedings of the American Philosophical
Society, vol. 78, no. 4, 1938, pp. 529-543
 R.G. Collingwood, An Autobiography, Oxford: Oxford University Press
 Arthur O. Lovejoy, “Reflections on the History of Ideas”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol.
1, no. 1, 1940, pp. 3-23
 Leo Spitzer, “History of Ideas Versus Reading of Poetry”, South Review, vol. 6, no. 3, 1941, pp.
586-604
 R.G. Collingwood, The Idea of History, Oxford: Oxford University Press 1946
 Franklin L. Baumer, “Intellectual History and its Problems”, Journal of Modern History, vol.
21, no. 3, 1949, pp. 191-203
 John Higham, “The Rise of American Intellectual History”, American Historical Review, April,
1951, pp. 453-471
 George Boas et.al., Studies in Intellectual History, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
1953
 Richard Wohl, “Intellectual History: An Historian’s View”, The Historian, vol. 16, pp. 62-77
 John Higham, “Intellectual History and its Neighbours”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 15,
1955, pp. 339-347
 Henry Lee Swint, “Trends in the Teaching of Social and Intellectual History”, Social Studies,
vol. 46, 1955, pp. 243-51
 John C. Greene, “Objectives and Methods in Intellectual History”, Mississippi Valley Historical
Review, vol. 44, no. 1, 1957, pp. 58-74
 Peter Laslett, “Introduction”, in John Locke, Two Treatises of Government, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press 1960

2
 John Higham, “American Intellectual History, a Critical Appraisal”, American Quarterly, vol.
13, no. 2, 1961, pp. 219-233
 Crane Brinton, “Introduction”, in Brinton, Ideas and Men. The Story of Western Thought,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall 1963, 2. ed.
 John Herma Randall, “Arthur O. Lovejoy and the History of Ideas”, Philosophy and the
Phenomenological Research, vol. 23, no. 4, 1963, pp. 475-479
 Maurice Mandelbaum, “The History of Ideas, Intellectual History, and the History of
Philosophy”, History and Theory, 1965, pp. 33-66
 Rush Welter, “The History of Ideas in America: An essay in Redefinition”, Journal of American
History, vol. 51, no. 4, 1965, pp. 599-614
 R.S. Crane, “Philosophy, Literature, and the History of Ideas”, in Crane, The Idea of the
Humanities and other Essays Critical and Historical, vol. 1, Chicago & London: University of
Chicago Press 1967
 Peter Gay, “The Social History of Ideas: Ernst Cassirer and After”, in Kurt H. Wolff &
Barrington Moore (eds.), The Critical Spirit. Essays in Honor of Herbert Marcuse, Boston:
Beacon Press 1967
 Quentin Skinner, “The Limits of Historical Explanation”, Philosophy, vol. 46, 1967, pp.
 Hajo Holborn, “The History of Ideas”, American Historical Review, vol. 73, no. 3, 1968, pp.
683-695
 Louis O. Mink, “Change and Causality in the History of Ideas”, Eighteenth-Century Studies,
1968, pp. 7-25
 Johannes Sløk, Hvad er idehistorie? Et programskrift, København: Gyldendal 1968
 John Dunn, “The Identity of the History of Ideas”, Philosophy, April 1968, pp. 85-103
 Johannes Sløk, Fylde eller tomhed, København: Gyldendal 1968
 Georg Boas, The History of ideas. An Introduction, New York: Charles Schribner’s Sons
 Klaus von Beyme, Politische Ideengeschichte. Probleme eines interdisziplinären
Forschungsbereiches, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) 1969
 Hayden White, “The tasks of intellectual history”, The Monist, vol. 53, no. 4, 1969, pp. 606-630
 John Higham, “Part II: Polarities in Intellectual History, chap. 2. Intellectual History and its
Neighbors; 3. The Study of American Intellectual History”, in Higham, Writing American
History. Essays on Modern Scholarship, Bloomington & London: Indiana University Press
1970

3
 Robert Darnton, “In search of enlightenment: recent attempts to create a social history of ideas”,
Journal of Modern History, vol. 43, no. 1, 1971, pp. 113-132
 Felix Gilbert, “Intellectual History: Its Aims and Methods”, in Gilbert & Stephen R. Graubard
(eds.), Historical Studies Today, New York: W.W. Norton & Co 1972
 Reinhart Koselleck, “Einleitung”, in Otto Brunner, Werner Conze & Reinhart Koselleck (eds.),
Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexicon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in
Deutschland, vol. 1, Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta 1972
 Hayden White, The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe, Baltimore &
London: Johns Hopkins University Press 1973
 Charles D. Tarlton, “Historicity, Meaning and Revisionism in the Study of Political Thought”,
History and Theory, vol. 12, no. 3, 1973, pp. 307-328
 Arthur A. Ekirch, American Intellectual History: the Development of the Discipline,
Washington: American Historical Association Pamphlets, no. 102, 1973
 Philip P. Wiener, “Towards Commemorating the Centenary of Arthur O. Lovejoy’s Birthday
(October 10, 1873)”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 34, no. 4, 1973, pp. 591-598
 Bhikhu Parekh & R.N. Berki, “The History of Political Ideas: A Critique of Q. Skinner’s
Methodology”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 34, no. 2, 1973, pp. 163-184
 Philip P. Wiener, “Preface”, in Wiener (ed.), Dictionary of the History of Ideas, New York:
Charles Schribner 1973
 F. E. L. Priestly, “Mapping the World of Ideas. Review of the Dictionary of the History of
Ideas”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 35, 1973, pp. 527-537
 Gordon J. Schochet, “Quentin Skinner’s Method”, Political Theory, vol. 2, no. 3, 1974, pp. 261-
276
 Quentin Skinner, “Some Problems in the Analysis of Political Thought and Action”, Political
Theory, vol. 2, no. 3, 1974, pp. 277-303
 B.A. Haddock, “The History of Ideas and the Study of Politics”, Political Theory, vol. 2, no. 4,
1974, pp. 420-431
 Masao Maruyama, Studies in the Intellectual History of Tokugawa Japan, Princeton University
Press 1974 [1940-44], “Introduction”
 Gerald Izenberg, “Psychohistory and Intellectual History”, History and Theory, vol. 14, 1975,
pp. 139-155

4
 Hajime Nakamura, ”Introductory Remarks” in A Comparative History of Ideas, Delhi: Motilal
Banarsidass Publishers 1975
 Jaako Hintikka, “Gaps in the Great Chain of Being: An Exercise in the Methodology of the
History of Ideas”, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, vol.
49, 1975-6, pp. 22-38
 Helmut Berding, “Begriffsgeschichte und Sozialgeschichte”, Historische Zeitschrift, no. 233,
1976, pp. 98-110
 Arnaldo Momigliano, “A Piedmontese View of the History of Ideas”, in Momigliano, Essays in
Ancient and Modern Historiography, Oxford: Basil Blackwell 1977
 Michel Foucault, “History of Systems of Thought”, in Donald F. Bouchard (ed.), Michel
Foucault. Language, Counter-Memory, Practice. Selected Essays and Interviews, Ithaca & New
York: Cornell University Press 1977
 Paul K. Conkin, “Intellectual History: Past, Present and Future”, chapter 5 in Charles F. Delzell
(ed.), The Future of History, Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press 1977
 Sande Cohen, “Structuralism and the Writing of Intellectual History”, History and Theory, vol.
17, no. 2, 1978, pp. 175-206
 James Sheehan, “Begriffsgeschichte: Theory and Practice”, Journal of Modern History, vol. 50,
1978, pp. 312-319
 Hayden White, Tropics of Discourse. Essays in Cultural Criticism, Baltimore & London: Johns
Hopkins University Press 1978
 Leonard Krieger, “The Autonomy of Intellectual History”, in Georg G. Iggers & Harold T.
Parker (eds.), International Handbook of Historical Studies, Westport, Ct.: Metheuen 1979
 Andrew Lockyer, “Traditions as contexts in the history of political theory”, Political Studies,
vol. 27, 1979, pp. 201-217
 John Higham & Paul K. Conkin (eds.), New Directions in American Intellectual History,
Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press 1979
 Laurence Veysey, “Intellectual History and the New Social History”
 Gordon S. Wood, “Intellectual History and the Social Sciences”
 David A. Hollinger, “Historians and the Discourse of Intellectuals”
 Rush Welter, On Studying the National Mind”
 Sacvan Bercovitch, “New England’s Errand Reappraised”
 Henry F. May, “Intellectual History and Religious History”

5
  Dorothy Ross, “The Liberal Tradition Revisited and the Republican Tradition
Addressed”
 Thomas L. Haskell, “Deterministic Implications of Intellectual History”
 Murray G. Murphey, “The Place of Beliefs in Modern Culture”
 David D. Hall, “The World of Print and Collective Mentality in Seventeenth-
Century New England”
 Thomas Bender, “The Cultures of Intellectual Life: The City and the
Professions”
 Neil Harris, “Iconography and Intellectual History: the Half-Tone Effect”
 Warren I. Susman, “’Personality’ and the Making of Twentieth-Century Culture”
 John Dunn, “The Identity of the History of Ideas”, in Dunn, Political Obligation in its
Historical Context. Essays in Political Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1980
 Daniel J. Wilson, Arthur O. Lovejoy and the Quest for Intelligibility, N.C: Chapel Hill 1980
 Robert Darnton, “Intellectual and Cultural History”, chap. 14 in Michael Kammen (ed.), The
Past Before Us. Contemporary Historical Writing in the United States, Ithaca & London:
Cornell University Press 1980
 William J. Bouwsma, “Intellectual History in the 1980s: From the History of Ideas to the
History of Meaning”, Journal of Interdisciplinary History, vol. 12, no. 2, 1981, pp. 279-291
 J.G.A. Pocock, “The Reconstruction of Discourse: Towards the Historiography of Political
Thought”, Modern Language Notes, vol. 96, no. 5, 1981, pp. 959-980
 Michel Foucault, “The Order of Discourse”, in Robert Young (ed.), Untying the Text: A Post-
Structuralist Reader, Boston, London & Henley: Routledge & Kegan Pail 1981
 Joel Colton, “Intellectual History in the 1980s: The Case for the Defense”, Journal of
Interdisciplinary History, vol. 12, no. 2, 1981, pp. 293-298
 J.G.A. Pocock, “Afterword: The Machiavellian Moment Revisited: A Study in History and
Ideology”, Journal of Modern History, vol. 53, 1981, pp. 49-72
 Ernst Schulin, “German ‘Geistesgeschichte’, American ‘Intellectual History’ and French
‘Historie des Mentalités’ since 1900. A Comparison”, History of European Ideas, vol. 1, no. 3,
1981, pp. 195-214
 John G. Gunnell, “Interpretation and the History of Political Theory: Apology and
Epistemology”, American Political Science Review, vol. 76, 1982, pp. 317-327

6
 Ian Shapiro, ”Realism in the Study of the History of Ideas”, History of Political Thought, vol. 3,
no. 3, 1982, pp. 535-578
 Dominick LaCapra & Steven L. Kaplan (eds.), Modern European Intellectual History.
Reappraisals and New Perspectives, Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press 1982
 Roger Chartier, “Intellectual History or Sociocultural History? The French
Trajectories”
 Dominick LaCapra, “Rethinking Intellectual History and Reading Texts”
 Martin Jay, “Should Intellectual History Take a Linguistic Turn? Reflections on
the Habermas-Gadamer Debate”
 Hans Kellner, “Triangular Anxieties: The Present State of European Intellectual
History”
 Mark Poster, “The Future According to Foucault: The Archeology of Knowledge
and Intellectual History”
 E.M. Henning, “Archeology, Deconstruction, and Intellectual History”
 Keith Michael Baker, “On the Problem of the Ideological Origins of the French
Revolution”
 Peter Jelavich, “Popular Dimensions of Modernist Elite Culture: The Case of
Theater in Fin-de-Siècle Munich”
 David James Fisher, “Reading Freud’s Civilization and Its Discontents”
 Hayden White, “Method and Ideology in Intellectual History: The Case of Henry
Adams”
 Dominick LaCapra, Rethinking Intellectual History. Texts, Contexts, Language, Ithaca &
London: Cornell University Press 1983
 Dominick LaCapra, “Intellectual History and Defining the Present as ‘Postmodern’”, in Ihab
Hassan & Sally Hassan (eds.), Innovation/Renovation. New Perspectives on the Humanities,
Madison: University of Wisconsin Press 1983
 Stefano Collini, Donald Winch & John Burrow, “The Governing Science: Things Political and
the Intellectual Historian”, in Collini, Winch & Burrow, That Noble Science of Politics. A Study
in Nineteenth-Century Intellectual History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1983
 Preston King (ed.), The History of Ideas. An Introduction to Method, London & Canberra:
Croom Helm 1983
 Preston King, “Introduction”

7
  Preston King, “Thinking Past a Problem”
 Michael Oakeshott, “The Activity of Being an Historian”
 Preston King, “Michael Oakeshott and Historical Particularism”
 R.G. Collingwood, “The Historical Logic of Question and Answer”
 Leo Strauss, “On Collingwood’s Philosophy of History”
 A.O. Lovejoy, “The Study of the History of Ideas”
 Maurice Mandelbaum, “On Lovejoy’s Historiography”
 Leo Strauss, “Political Philosophy and History”
 John G. Gunnell, “The Myth of the Tradition”
 Quentin Skinner, “Conventions and the Understanding of Speech Acts”
 Preston King, “The Theory of Context and the Case of Hobbes”
 John Patrick Diggins, “The Oyster and the Pearl: The Problem of Contextualism in Intellectual
History”, History and Theory, vol. 23, no. 2, 1984, pp. 151-169
 Iain Hampsher-Monk, “Political Languages in Time: The Work of J.G.A. Pocock”, British
Journal of Political Science, vol. 14, 1984, pp. 159-174
 Richard Rorty, “The Historiography of Philosophy: Four Genres”, in Rorty, J.B. Schneewind &
Quentin Skinner, Philosophy in History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1984
 Peter L. Janssen, “Political Thought as Traditionary Action: The Critical Response to Skinner
and Pocock”, History and Theory, vol. 24, 1985, pp. 115-146
 David Boucher, Texts in Context. Revisionist Methods for Studying the History of Ideas,
Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1985
 Conal Condren, The Study and Appraisal of Classic Texts. An Essay on Political Theory, Its
Inheritance, and the History of Ideas, Princeton: Princeton University Press 1985
 Rolf Reichardt, “Einleitung”, in Reichardt & Eberhard Schmitt (eds.), Handbuch politisch-
sozialer Grundbegriffe in Frankreich 1680-1820, München: R. Oldenbourg Verlag 1985
 Michael Ermarth, “Mindful Matters: The Empire’s New Codes and the Plight of Modern
European Intellectual History”, Journal of Modern History, vol. 57, no. 3, 1985, pp. 506-527
 Stefano Collini, “What is Intellectual History?”, History Today, October 1985, pp. 46-48
 Michael Biddiss , “What is Intellectual History?”, History Today, October 1985, pp. 49-50
 Quentin Skinner, “What is Intellectual History?”, History Today, October 1985, pp. 50-52
 J.G.A. Pocock, “What is Intellectual History?”, History Today, October 1985, pp. 52-53
 Bruce Kuklick, “What is Intellectual History?”, History Today, October 1985, pp. 53

8
 Michael Hunter, “What is Intellectual History?”, History Today, October 1985, pp. 53-54
 J.G.A. Pocock, “Introduction: The State of the Art”, in Pocock, Virtue, Commerce, and History.
Essays on Political Thought and History, Chiefly in the Eighteenth Century, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press 1985
 David A. Hollinger, In the American Province. Studies in the History and Historiography of
Ideas, Bloomington: Indiana University Press 1985
 Reinhart Koselleck, “Sozialgeschichte und Begriffsgeschichte”, in Wolfgang Schieder & Volker
Sellin (eds.), Sozialgeschichte in Deutschland, vol. 1, Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht 1986
 Melvin Richter, “History (Begriffsgeschichte) and Political Theory”, Political Theory, vol. 14,
no. 4, 1986, pp. 604-637
 Donald R. Kelley, “Horizons of Intellectual History: Retrospect, Circumspect, Prospect”,
Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 48, no. 1, 1987, pp. 143-169
 Dietrich Busse, Historische Semantik. Analyse eines Programms, Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta 1987
 P. & m. Kuntz (eds.), The Great Chain of Being after Fifty Years, New York
 Daniel J. Wilson, “Lovejoy’s The Great Chain of Being after Fifty Years”, Journal of the
History of Ideas, 1987, pp. 187-205
 Gladys Gordon-Bournique, “A.O. Lovejoy and the ‘History of Ideas’”, Journal of the History of
Ideas, 1987, pp. 207-210
 Edward P. Mahoney, “Lovejoy and the Hierarchy of Being”, Journal of the History of Ideas,
1987, pp. 211-230
 Francis Oakley, “Lovejoy’s Unexplored Option”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 1987, pp.
231-245
 John E. Toews, “Intellectual History after the Linguistic Turn: The Autonomy of Meaning and
the Irreducibility of Experience”, American Historical Review, vol. 92, 1987, pp. 879-907
 Hayden White, The Content of the Form. Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation,
Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press 1987
 Martin Jay, “Two Cheers for Paraphrase: The Confessions of a Synoptic Intellectual Historian”,
in Jay, Fin de Siècle Socialism and other essays, New York & London: Routledge 1988
 Anthony Pagden, “Rethinking the Linguistic Turn: Current Anxieties in Intellectual History”,
Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 49, no. 3, 1988, pp. 519-529
 Stefano Collini, “Discipline History and Intellectual History. Reflections on the Historiography
of the Social Sciences in Britain and France”, Revue de Synthèse, no. 3-4, 1988, pp. 387-399

9
 Michel de Certeau, The Writing of History, New York: Columbia University Press 1988
 Roger Chartier, Cultural History. Between Practices and Representations, Cambridge: Polity
Press 1988
 James Tully (ed.), Meaning and Context. Quentin Skinner and his Critics, Cambridge: Polity
1988
 James Tully, “The Pen is a Mighty Sword: Quentin Skinner’s Analysis of
Politics”
 Quentin Skinner, “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas”
 Quentin Skinner, “Motives, Intentions and the Interpretation of Texts”
 Quentin Skinner, “’Social Meaning’ and the Explanation of Social Action”
 Quentin Skinner, “Some Problems in the Analysis of Political Thought and
Action”
 Quentin Skinner, “Language and Social Change”
 Martin Hollis, “Say It with Flowers”
 Keith Graham, “How do Illocutionary Descriptions Explain?”
 Joseph V. Femia, “An Historicist Critique of ‘Revisionist’ Methods for
Studying”
 Kenneth Minogue, “Method in Intellectual History: Quentin Skinner’s
Foundations”
 Nathan Tarcov, “Quentin Skinner’s Method and Machiavelli’s Prince”
 John Keane, “More Theses on the Philosophy of History”
 Charles Taylor, “The Hermeneutics of Conflict”
 Quentin Skinner, “A Reply to my Critics”
 Reinhart Koselleck, “Linguistic Change and the History of Events”, Journal of Modern History,
vol. 61, December 1989, pp. 649-666
 Lloyd S. Kramer, “Literature, Criticism, and Historical Imagination: The Literary Challenge of
Hayden White and Dominick LaCapra”, in Lynn Hunt (ed.), The New Cultural History,
Berkeley: University of California Press 1989
 Quentin Skinner, “Language and Political Change”, in Terence Ball, James Farr & Rusell L.
Hansen (eds.), Political Innovation and Conceptual Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press 1989

10
 Manfred Hahn, “Auseinandergehende Verständnisse der Ideengeschichte”, Dialektik, 2000, pp.
198-221
 Melvin Richter, “Conceptualizing the Contestable: ‘Begriffsgeschichte’ and Political Concepts”,
pp. 135-143 in G. Scholtz (ed.), Interdiscziplinarität der Begriffsgeschichte, Hamburg: Felix
Meiner Verlag 2000
 James Farr, “Understanding Conceptual Change Politically” ”, in Terence Ball, James Farr &
Rusell L. Hansen (eds.), Political Innovation and Conceptual Change, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press 1989
 Dominick LaCapra, “Intellectual History and Critical Theory”, in LaCapra, Soundings in
Critical Theory, Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press 1989
 Kack Liveley & Andrew Reeve, “General Introduction”, in Liveley & Reeve (eds.), Modern
Political Theory from Hobbes to Marx. Key Debates, London & New York: Routledge 1989
 David Harlan, “Intellectual History and the Return of Literature”, American Historical Review,
vol. 94, 1989, pp. 581-609
 Keith Tribe, “The Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe Project: From History of Ideas to Conceptual
History. A Review Article”, Comparative Studies in Society, vol. 31, 1989, pp. 180-184
 Reinhart Koselleck, ”Social History and Conceptual History”, International Journal of Politics,
Culture and Society, vol. 2, no. 3, 1990, pp. 308-325
 Reinhart Koselleck, “Sprogændring og begivenhedshistorie”, Den jyske historiker, vol. 50,
1990, pp. 121-135
 Robert Darnton, The Kiss of Lamourette. Reflections on Cultural History, New York & London:
W.W. Norton & Co 1990
 Lars-Henrik Schmidt, “Den interpreterende konstruktion”, Den Jyske Historiker, no. 50, 1990,
pp. 55-64
 Fritz Ringer, ”The Intellectual Field, Intellectual History, and the Sociology of Knowledge”,
Theory & Society, vol. 19, 1990, pp. 269-294
 Charles Lemert, “The Habits of Intellectuals. Response to Ringer”, Theory & Society, vol. 19,
1990, pp. 295-310
 Martin Jay, “Fieldwork and Theorizing in Intellectual History. A Reply to Fritz Ringer”, Theory
& Society, vol. 19, 1990, pp. 311-321
 Fritz Ringer, “Rejoinder to Charles Lemert and Martin Jay”, Theory & Society, vol. 19, 1990,
pp. 323-334

11
 Melvin Richter, “Reconstructing the History of Political Languages: Pocock, Skinner, and the
Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe”, History and Theory, vol. 29, no. 1, 1990, pp. 38-70
 Donald R. Kelley, “What is Happening to the History of Ideas?”, Journal of the History of
Ideas, vol. 51, no. 1, 1990, pp. 3-25
 Donald R. Kelley, The History of Ideas. Canon and Variations, Rochester: University of
Rochester Press 1990
 Donald R. Kelley, “Introduction: Reflections on a Canon”
 Arthur O. Lovejoy, “Reflections on the History of Ideas”
 Frederick J. Teggart, “A Problem in the History of Ideas”
 Leo Spitzer, “Geistesgeschichte vs. History of Ideas as Apllied to Hitlerism”
 Arthur O. Lovejoy, “Reply to Professor Spitzer”
 Theodore Spencer, “Lovejoy’s ‘Essays in the History of Ideas’”
 Arthur O. Lovejoy, “Historiography and Evaluation: A Disclaimer”
 Abraham Edel, “Levels of Meaning and the History of Ideas”
 Paul O. Kristeller, “The Philosophical Significance of the History of Thought”
 Philip P. Wiener, “Logical Significance of the History of Thought”
 Joseph Anthony Mazzeo, “Some Interpretations of the History of Ideas”
 Leonard Krieger, “The Autonomy of Intellectual History”
 Daniel J. Wilson, “Arthur O. Lovejoy and the Moral of ‘The Great Chain of
Veing’”
 Kathleen E. Duffin, “Arthur O. Lovejoy and the Emergence of Novelty”
 Daniel J. Wilson, “Lovejoy’s ‘The Great Chain of Being’ after Fifty Years”
 Edward P. Mahoney, “Lovejoy and the Hierarchy of Being”
 Francis Oakley, “Lovejoy’s Unexplored Option”
 Johann Huizinga, “History Changing Form”
 Joseph Katz, “A Reply to J. Huizinga on the Form and Function of History”
 Calvin G. Rand, “Two Meanings of Historicism in the Writings of Dilthey,
Troeltsch, and Meinecke”
 Nils B. Kvastad, “Semantics in the Methodology of the History of Ideas”
 Paul O. Kristeller, “’Creativity’ and ‘Tradition’”
 Lester G. Crocker, “Interpreting the Enlightenment: A Political Approach”

12
  Patrick H. Hutton, “The Art of Memory Reconceived: From Rhetoric to
Psychoanalysis”
 Donald R. Kelley, “Horizons of Intellectual History: Retrospect, Circumspect,
Prospect”
 Richard Tuck, “History of Political Thought”, in Peter Burke (ed.), New Perspectives on
Historical Writing, Cambridge: Polity Press 1991
 Henry F. May, “Religion and American Intellectual History, 1945-1989: Reflections on an
Uneasy Relationship”, chap. 1 in May, The Divided Heart. Essays on Protestantism and the
Enlightenment in America, New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press
 Russel Jacoby, “A New Intellectual History?”, American Historical Review, April 1992, pp.
405-424
 Dominick LaCapra, “Intellectual History and Its Ways”, American Historical Review, April
1992, pp. 425-439
 Mark Bevir, “The Errors of Linguistic Contextualism”, History and Theory, vol. 31, 1992, pp.
276-98
 J.G.A. Pocock, ”A discourse of sovereignty: observations on the work in progress”, in Nicholas
Phillipson & Quentin Skinner, Political Discourse in Early Modern Britain (essays in honor of
J.G.A. Pocock), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1993
 Gerald N. Izenberg, ”Text, Context, and Psychology in Intellectual History”, chap. 3 in Henry
Kozicki (ed.), Developments in Modern Historiography, Houndmills & London: Macmillan
 Frans Gregersen & Simo Køppe, “Indledning til idehistorien”, in Gregersen & Køppe,
Idehistorie, vol. 1, Amanda 1994
 Robert Castel, ”’Problematization’ as a Mode of Reading History”, chap. 13 in Jan Goldstein
(ed.), Foucault and the Writing of History, Oxford & Cambridge: Blackwell 1994
 Hartmut Rosa, ”Ideengeschichte und Gesellschaftsgeschichte: Der Beitrag der ’Cambridge
School’ zur Metatheorie”, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, vol. 35, 1994, pp. 197-223
 Robert Mayhew, ”Contextualizing Practice in Intellectual History”, Journal of Historical
Geography, vol. 20, no. 3, 1994, pp. 323-328
 Lennart Olausson (ed.), Idéhistoriens egenheter. Teori- och metodproblem inom idéhistorien,
Stockholm: Brutus Östlings Bokförlag 1994
 Lennart Olausson, ”Från text till text”
 Bernt Skovdahl, “Idéhistoria och källkritik”

13
  Staffan Carlshamre, ”Sant eller intressant? Filosofi och idéhistoria”
 Jonas Anshelm & Martin Kylhammar, ”Om behovet av samverkan mellan
idéhistoria och litteraturvetenskap”
 Bosse Holmqvist, ”Om relativism”
 Lennart Olausson, ”Kunnskapssociologi och idéhistoria”
 Tomas Jonsson, “Et antinomiskt ideologibegrepp”
 Knud Haakonssen, “The History of Ideas”, in Haakonssen, Natural Law and Moral Philosophy
from Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1995
 Suzanne Marchand, “Problems and Prospects for Intellectual History”, New German Critique,
vol. 65, 1995, pp. 87-96
 Max Edling & Ulf Mörkenstam, “Quentin Skinner: From Historian of Ideas to Political
Scientist”, Scandinavian Political Studies, vol. 18, no. 2, 1995, pp. 119-132
 Melvin Richter, The History of Political and Social Concepts. A Critical Introduction, New
York & Oxford: Oxford University Press 1995
 James D. Faubion (ed.), Michel Foucault. Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984, vol. 2:
Aesthetics (part 2: Methodology and Epistemology), London: Penguin 1996
 John Dunn, “The History of Political Theory”, chap. 2 in Dunn, The History of Political Theory
and other Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1996
 Günther Lottes, “’The State of the Art’. Stand und Perspektive der ‘intellectual history’”, pp.
27-46 in F-L Kroll (ed.), Neue Wege der Ideengeschichte. Festschrift für Kurt Kluxen zum 85.
Geburtstag, Paderborn: Schöningh Verlag 1996
 Uffe Østergård & Jan Ifversen (eds.), Begreb og historie, Aarhus: Aarhus Universitet 1996
 Jan Ifversen, ”Hvordan analysere demokrati i tale?”
 Uffe Østergaard & Jan Ifversen, ”Europæisk civilisation, begrebshistorie og
diskursanalyse”
 Hartmut Lehmann & Melvin Richter, The Meaning of Historical Terms and Concepts. New
Studies on Begriffsgeschichte, Washington: German Historical Institute 1996
 Melvin Richter, “Appreciating a Contemporary Classic: The Geschichtliche
Grundbegriffe and Future Scholarship
 James van Horn Melton, “Otto Brunner and the Ideological Origins of
Begriffsgeschichte”
 Donald R. Kelley, “On the Margins of Begriffsgeschichte”

14
  Gabriel Motzkin, “On Koselleck’s Intuition of Time in History”
 J.G.A. Pocock, “Concepts and Discourses: A Difference in Culture? Comment
on a Paper by Melvin Richter”
 Reinhart Koselleck, “A Response to Comments on the Geschichtliche
Grundbegriffe”
 Intellectual News, no. 1, 1996
 Susanna Åkermann, A View from Afar
 Michael Fend, Intellectual Histories of Music
 Thomas Frangenberg, Art History and Intellectual History
 Marina Frasca-Spada, Notes on Intellectual History, History of Philosophy and
the History of Ideas
 Michael Hunter, Intellectual History: Biographical and Archival Sources
 Nicholas Jardine, Intellectual History and Philosophy of Science
 David Katz, Intellectual History and Religious History
 Donald R. Kelley, Prolegomena to the Study of Intellectual History
 John Christian Laursen, Intellectual History in Political Theory
 Christopher Ligota, Topics in the History of Scholarship
 Anthony Pagden, The Rise and Decline of Intellectual History
 Wilhelm Schmidt-Biggemann, Was ist "Intellectual History"?
 Ulrich Johannes Schneider, Intellectual History and the History of Philosophy
 Edoardo Tortarolo, Intellectual History and Historiography
 Vladimír Urbánek, Comenius Studies and Intellectual History in the Czech
Republik
 Theo Verbeek, Intellectual History and Dutch Cartesianism
 Françoise Waquet, Histoire des relations intellectuelles dans la République des
Lettres
 Charles Webster, Medicine and Intellectual History
 Iain Willison, Intellectual History and the History of the Book
 Donald R. Kelley, What is happening to the History of Ideas?
 Reinhart Koselleck, “The Temporalisation of Concepts”, Redescriptions. Finnish Yearbook of
Political Thought, 1997, pp. 16-24

15
 William W. Fisher, “Texts and Contexts: The Application to American Legal History of the
Methodologies of Intellectual History”, Stanford Law Review, vol. 49, no. 5, 1997, pp. 1065-
1110
 Robert W. T. Martin, “Context and Contradiction: Toward a Political Theory of Conceptual
Change”, Political Research Quarterly, vol. 50, no. 2, 1997, pp. 413-436
 Jay M. Smith, “No More Language Games: Words, Beliefs, and the Political Culture of Early
Modern France”, American Historical Review, vol. 102, no. 5, 1997, pp. 1413-1440
 Kari Palonen, ”Quentin Skinner’s Rhetoric of Conceptual Change”, History of the Human
Sciences, vol. 10, no. 2, 1997, pp. 61-80
 Kari Palonen, “An Application of Conceptual History to Itself”, Redescriptions, 1997, pp. 39-69
 Michael Freeden, “Editorial: Ideologies and conceptual history”, Journal of Political Ideologies,
vol. 2, no. 1, 1997, pp. 3-11
 Gad Prudovsky, “Can We Ascribe to Past Thinkers Copncepts They Had no Linguistic Means
to Express?”, History and Theory, vol. 36, no. 1, 1997, pp. 15-31
 Mark Bevir, “Mind and Method in the History of Ideas”, History and Theory, vol. 36, no. 2,
1997, pp. 167-189
 Roger Chartier, On the Edge of the Cliff. History, Language and Practices, Baltimore &
London: Johns Hopkins University Press 1997
 D.R. Woolf, “The Writing of Early Modern European Intellectual History, 1945-1995”, in
Michael Bentley (ed.), Companion to Historiography, London & New York: Routledge 1997
 J. Gunnell, “Time and Interpretation: Understanding Concepts and Conceptual Change”,
History of Political Thought, vol. 19, 1998, pp. 641-658
 Iain Hampsher-Monk, Karin Tilmans & Frank van Vree (eds.), History of Concepts –
Comparative Perspectives, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press 1998
 Iain Hampsher-Monk, Karin Tilmans & Frank van Vree , ”A Comparative
Perspective on Conceptual History – An Introduction”
 Pim den Boer, “The Historiography of German Geistesgeschichte and the Dutch
Project of Conceptual History”
 Reinhart Koselleck, “Social History and Begriffsgeschichte”
 Iain Hampsher-Monk, “Speech Acts, Languages or Conceptual History?”
 Hans Erich Bödeker, “Concept – Meaning – Discourse. Begriffsgeschichte
Reconsidered”

16
  Maurizio Viroli, “The Origin and the Meaning of the Reason of State”
 Terence Ball, “Conceptual History and the History of Political Thought”
 Bernhard F. Scholz, “Conceptual History in Context: Reconstructing the
Terminology of an Academic Discipline”
 Willem Frijhoff, “Conceptual History, Social History and Cultural History: The
test of ‘Cosmopolitism’”
 Hans-Jürgen Lüsebrink, “Conceptual History and Conceptual Transfer: The Case
of ‘Nation’ in Revolutionary France and Germany”
 Bram Kempers, “Words, Images and All the Pope’s Men. Raphael’s Stanza della
Segnatura and the Synthesis of Divine Wisdom”
 Eddy de Jongh, “Painted Words in Dutch Art of the Seventeenth Century”
 Rolf Reichardt, “Historical Semantics and Political Iconography: The case of the
Game of the French Revolution (1791/92)”
 Martin van Gelderen, “Between Cambridge and Heidelberg: Concepts,
Languages and Images in Intellectual History”
 Martin Jay, “European Intellectual History and the Specter of Multiculturalism”, in Jay,
Cultural Semantics. Keywords of Our Time, Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press 1998
 Terence Ball, “Political Argument and Conceptual Change”, in Ball, Transforming Political
Discourse. Political Theory and Critical Conceptual History, Oxford: Basil Blackwell 1998
 Jerry Z. Muller, “Begriffsgeschichte: Origins and Prospects”, History of European Ideas, vol.
25, 1999, pp. 3-7
 Hayden White, “Literary Theory and Historical Writing”, in White, Figural Realism. Studies in
the Mimesis Effect, Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press 1999
 Hayden White, “Historical Emplotment and the Problem of Truth in Historical Representation”,
in White, Figural Realism. Studies in the Mimesis Effect, Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins
University Press 1999
 Hayden White, “Formalist and Contextualist Strategies in Historical Explanation”, in White,
Figural Realism. Studies in the Mimesis Effect, Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University
Press 1999
 Mark Bevir, The Logic of the History of Ideas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1999
 James Schmidt, “How Historical is Begriffsgeschichte?”, History of European Ideas, vol. 25,
1999, pp. 9-14

17
 Janet Coleman, “The Practical Use of Begriffsgeschichte”, Redescriptions, vol. 3, 1999, pp. 28-
40
 Kari Palonen, “Rhetorical and Temporal Perspectives on Conceptual Change. Theses on
Quentin Skinner and Reinhart Koselleck”, Redescriptions, vol. 3, 1999, pp. 41-59
 Quentin Skinner, “Rhetoric and Conceptual Change”, Redescriptions, vol. 3, 1999, pp. 60-73
 David Armitage, “Answering the Call: The History of Political and Social Concepts in English”,
History of European Ideas, vol. 25, 1999, pp. 15-22
 Daniel Gordon, “Modernity and its Discontents: Some Critical Thoughts on Conceptual
History”, History of European Ideas, vol. 25, 1999, pp. 23-29
 Melvin Richter, “Reply to Comments”, History of European Ideas, vol. 25, 1999, pp. 31-37
 P.J. Kelly, “Contextual and Non-Contextual Histories of Political Thought”, in Jack Hayward,
Brian Barry & Archie Brown (eds.), The British Study of Politics in the Twentieth Century,
Oxford: Oxford University Press 1999
 Nils Andersson & Henrik Björck (eds.), Vad är idéhistoria? Perspektiv på ämnets identitet
under sextio år, Stockholm: Brutus Östlings Bokförlag 1999
 Siep Stuurman, ”The Canon of the History of Political Thought: Its Critique and a Proposed
Alternative”, History and Theory, vol. 39, 2000, pp. 147-166
 Janet Coleman, “Introduction” in Coleman, A History of Political Thought from Ancient Greece
to Early Christianity, Oxford: Blackwell 2000
 Christoff Dipper, ”Die ’Geschichtlichen Grundbegriffe’. Von der Begriffsgeschichte zur
Theorie der historischen Zeichen”, Historische Zeitschrift, no. 270, 2000, pp. 281-308
 Stefan Collini, “Introduction”, in Stefan Collini, Richard Whatmore & Brian Young (eds.),
History, Religion and Culture. British Intellectual History 1750-1950, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press 2000
 Mark Bevir, “The Logic of the History of Ideas”, Rethinking History, vol. 4, no. 3, 2000, pp.
295-300
 Kari Palonen, “Logic or Rhetoric in the History of Political Thought? Comments on Mark
Bevir”, Rethinking History, vol. 4, no. 3, 2000, pp. 301-310
 Siep Stuurman, “On Intellectual Innovation and the Methodology of the History of Ideas”,
Rethinking History, vol. 4, no. 3, 2000, pp. 311-319
 F.R. Ankersmit, “Comments on Bevir’s The Logic of the History of Ideas”, Rethinking History,
vol. 4, no. 3, 2000, pp. 321-331

18
 Allan Megill, “Imagining the History of Ideas”, Rethinking History, vol. 4, no. 3, 2000, pp. 333-
340
 Mark Bevir, “Philosophy, Rhetoric, and Power: A Response to Critics”, Rethinking History, vol.
4, no. 3, 2000, pp. 341-350
 Mark Bevir and Frank Ankersmit, “Exchanging Ideas”, Rethinking History, vol. 4, no. 3, 2000,
pp. 351-372
 Mark Bevir, “Begriffsgeschichte”, History and Theory, vol. 39, no. 2, 2000, pp. 273-284
 Erland Mårald, “Idéhistoria ur ett världshistoriskt perspektiv”, i Mohammad Fazlhashemi,
Anders Öckerman & Ronny Ambjörnsson (eds.), Vidgade vyer. Globalt perspektiv på
idéhistoria, Lund: Studentlitteratur 2000
 Mark Bevir, “The Text as a Historical Object”, Redescriptions. Finnish Yearbook of Political
Thought, 2000, pp. 201-222
 Timothy Bahti, “Literary Criticism and the History of Ideas”, in Christa Knellwolf &
Christopher Norris (eds.), Literary Criticism, vol. 9, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
2001
 Slagmark – tidsskrift for idéhistorie, no. 33, 2001: Quentin Skinner og intellektuel historie
 Tore Eriksen & Peter C. Kjærgaard, ”Quentin Skinner – fra idéhistorie til
intellektuel historie”
 Quentin Skinner, ”Moralske principper og social forandring”
 Anthony Pagden, ”Intellektuel historie”
 Tore Frängsmyr, ”Idéhistorie eller idéernes funktion i historien”
 Thomas Krogh, ”Quentin Skinner og problemer i at skrive den politiske
tænknings historie”
 Hans-Jørgen Schanz, ”Intellektuel historie som genre og disciplin”
 Victoria Höög, ”Historiens tvetydighed: Quentin Skinner og problematiseringen
af traditionen”
 Duncan Forbes, “Aesthetic thoughts on doing the history of ideas”, History of European Ideas,
vol. 27, 2001, pp. 101-113
 Günther Lottes, “Begriffsgeschichte, Diskursgeschichte”, pp. 345-379 in U. Daniel (ed.),
Kompendium Kulturgeschichte. Theorien, Praxis, Schlüsselwörter, Frankfurt am Main: Verlag
Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht

19
 Peter J. Boettke, “F.A. Hayek as an intellectual historian of economics”, chap. 7 in Steven G.
Medema & Warren J. Samuels (eds.), Historians of Economics and Economic Thought, London
& New York: Routledge 2001
 Geoffrey Gilbert, “Donald Winch as intellectual historian”, chap. 18 in Steven G. Medema &
Warren J. Samuels (eds.), Historians of Economics and Economic Thought, London & New
York: Routledge 2001
 Duncan Bell, “The Cambridge School and world politics: critical theory, history and conceptual
change”, 2001, www.theglobalsite.ac.uk
 Eckhart Hellmuth & Christoph von Ehrenstein, “Intellectual History Made in Britain: Die
Cambridge School und ihre Kritiker”, Geschichte und Gesellschaft, vol. 27, 2001, pp. 149-172
 Daniel Wickberg, “Intellectual History vs. the Social History of Intellectuals”, Rethinking
History, vol. 5, no. 3, 2001, pp. 383-395
 Dominick LaCapra, Writing History, Writing Trauma, Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins
University Press 2001
 David Runciman, “History of Political Thought: The State of the Discipline”, British Journal of
Politics and International Relations, vol. 3, no. 1, 2001, pp. 84-104
 Iain Hampsher-Monk, “The History of Political Thought and the Political History of Thought”,
in Dario Castiglione & Iain Hampsher-Monk, The History of Political Thought in National
Context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2001
 Melvin Richter, “A German Version of the ‘Linguistic Turn’: Reinhart Koselleck and the
History of Political and Social Concepts (Begriffsgeschichte)”, in Dario Castiglione & Iain
Hampsher-Monk, The History of Political Thought in National Context, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press 2001
 Quentin Skinner, “The Rise of, Challenge to and Prospects for a Collingwoodian Approach to
the History of Political Thought”, in Dario Castiglione & Iain Hampsher-Monk, The History of
Political Thought in National Context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2001
 Donald R. Kelley, “Eclecticism and the History of Ideas”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol.
62, no. 4, 2001, pp. 577-592
 F. Oz-Salzberger, “Intellectual History”, in Neil J. Smelser (ed.), International Encyclopedia of
the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Amsterdam & New York: Elsevier 2001, pp. 7605-7612
 Trond Berg Eriksen & Øystein Sørensen, ”Redaktørenes forord”, in Eriksen & Sørensen (eds.),
Norsk Idéhistorie, vol. 1, Oslo: Aschehoug 2001

20
 Trond Berg Eriksen & Øystein Sørensen, ”Tusen års tankeliv”, in Eriksen & Sørensen (eds.),
Norsk Idéhistorie, vol. 6, Oslo: Aschehoug 2001
 Jason David BeDuhn, “The historical assessment of speech acts: clarification of Austin and
Skinner for the study of religions”, Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, vol. 14, 2002,
pp. 84-113
 Donald R. Kelley, The Descent of Ideas. The History of Intellectual History, Aldershot: Ashgate
2002
 Joachim Eibach & Günther Lottes (eds.), Kompass der Geschichtswissenschaft, Göttingen:
Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2002
o Günther Lottes, “Neue Ideengeschichte”
o Luise Schorn-Schütte, “Neue Geistesgeschichte”
o Raingard Esser, “Historische Semantik”
o Iain Hampsher-Monk, “Neuere angloamerikanske Ideengeschichte
o Robert Jütte, ”Diskursanalyse in Frankreich”
 O. Asbach, “Von der Geschichte der politischen Ideen zur ‘History of Political Discourses’?
Skinner, Pocock und die ‘Cambridge School”, Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, vol. 12, 2002,
no. 2, pp. 637-667
 History of European Ideas, vol. 28, no 1-2, 2002: Mark Bevir and the Logic of the History of
Ideas: A Symposium
o Robert Stern, “History, meaning and interpretation: a critical response to Bevir”, pp. 1-
12
o Hugh Rayment-Pickard, “Derrida and fidelity to history”, pp. 13-20
o James Martin, “The political logic of discourse: a neo-Gramscian view”, pp. 21-31
o Melissa Lane, “Why the History of Ideas at all?”, pp. 33-41
o Alun Munslow, “Objectivity and the writing of history”, pp. 43-50
o R.M. Burns, “Language, tradition, and self in the generation of meaning”, pp. 51-75
o Jane Garnett, “Whose logic? Reflections on gender in the history of ideas”, pp. 77-82
o Mark Bevir, “Clarifications”, pp. 83-100
o Brian Yong, “The tyranny of the definite article: Some thoughts on the art of intellectual
history”, 101-117
 Reinhart Koselleck, The Practice of Conceptual History. Timing History, Spacing Concepts,
Stanford: Stanford University Press 2002

21
 Peter Burke, “Context in Context”, Common Knowledge, vol. 8, no. 1, 2002, pp. 152-177
 Kari Palonen, “The History of Concepts as a Style of Political Theorizing. Quentin Skinner's
and Reinhart Koselleck's Subversion of Normative Political Theory”, European Journal of
Political Theory, vol. 1, no. 1, 2002, pp. 91-106
 Sandro Chignola, “History of political thought and the history of political concepts: Koselleck's
proposal and Italian research”, History of Political Thought, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 517-541
 Petri Koikkalainen & Sami Syrjämäki, “Interview: Quentin Skinner on Encountering the Past”,
Redescriptions. Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought, no. 6, 2002, pp. 34-63
 Donald R. Kelley, “Intellectual History and Cultural History: The Inside and the Outside”,
History of the Human Sciences, vol. 15, no. 2, 2002, pp. 1-19
 Quentin Skinner, Visions of Politics, vol. 1: Regarding Method, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press 2002
 Hans Erich Bödeker (ed.), Begriffgeschichte, Diskursgeschichte, Metapherngeschichte,
Göttingen: Wallstein 2002
 Hans Erich Bödeker, “Ausprägungen der historischen Semantik in den
historiscen Kulturwissenschaften”
 Reinhart Koselleck, “Hinweise auf die temporalen Strukturen
begriffsgeschichtlichen Wandels”
 Ulrich Ricken, “Zum Verhältnis vergleichender Begriffsgeschichte und
vergleichender Lexikologie”
 Hans Erich Bödeker, ”Reflexionen über Begriffsgeschichte als Methode”
 Jacques Guilhaumou, “L’historie linguistique des usages conceptuels à l’épreuve
des événements linguistiques”
 Mark Bevir, “The Role of Contexts in Understanding and Explanation”
 Rüdiger Zill, “Substrukturen des Denkens. Grenzen und Perspektiven einer
Metapherngeschichte nach Hans Blumenberg”
 Lutz Danneberg: ”Sinn und Unsinn einer Metapherngeschichte”
 Richard Macksey, “The History of Ideas at 80”, Modern Language Notes, vol. 117, no. 5, 2002,
pp. 1083-1097
 Sandro Chignola, “History of Political Thought and the History of Political Concepts.
Koselleck’s Proposal and Italian Research”, History of Political Thought, vol. 23, no. 3, 2002,
pp. 517-541

22
 Annabel Brett, “What is Intellectual History Now?”, in David Cannadine (ed.), What is History
Now?, Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan 2002
 Duncan S.A. Bell, “Language, Legitimacy, and the Project of Critique”, Alternatives, vol. 27,
2002, pp. 327-350
 Jan Ifversen, “Text, Discourse, Concept: Approaches to Textual Analysis”, Kontur, no. 7, 2003,
pp. 60-69
 Lutz Raphael, “Mentalitäten, Begriffe und politische Sprachen: Wege der Kultur- und
ideengeschichtlichen Forschung”, chap. 9 in Raphael, Geschichtswissenschaft im Zeitalter der
Extreme. Theorien, Methoden, Tendenzen von 1900 bis zur Gegenwart, München: C.H. Beck
2003
 Jussi Kurunmäki & Kari Palonen (eds.), Zeit, Geschichte und Politik. Time, History and
Politics. Zum achtzigsten Geburtstag von Reinhart Koselleck, Jyväskylä: University of
Jyväskylä Press 2003
o Wolf-Dieter Narr und Kari Palonen, ”Zeit, Zeitlichkeit und Geschichte – sperrige
Reflexionen. Reinhart Koselleck im Gespräch”
o Patricia Springborg, ”What can we say about history? Modernity and historical
consciousness”
o Björn Wittrock, “Cultural crystallisation and conceptual change. Modernity, axiality and
meaning in history”
 Melvin Richter, ”Toward a Lexicon of European Political and Legal Concepts: A Comparison
of Begriffsgeschichte and the ‘Cambridge School’”, Critical Review of International Social and
Political Philosophy, vol. 6, no. 2, 2003, pp. 91-120
 Herfried Münkler, “Politische Ideengeschichte”, in Münkler (ed.), Politikwissenschaft. Ein
Grundkurs, Hamburg: Rohwolt 2003
 Kari Palonen, Quentin Skinner – History, Politics, Rhetoric, Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press 2003
 David Boucher & Paul Kelly, “Introduction”, in Boucher & Kelly (eds.), Political Thinkers
from Socrates to the Present, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2003
 Jan Ifversen, “Om den tyske begrebshistorie”, Politologiske Studier, no. 1, 2003, pp. 18-34
 Per Mouritsen, ”Hvorfor idéhistorie – og hvordan?”, Politologiske Studier, no. 1, 2003, pp. 8-17
 Trond Berg Eriksen, Hva er Idéhistorie, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget 2003

23
 Sven Arntzen & Otto M. Christensen (eds.), Hvor kommer idéhistorien fra? Tematiske og
teoretiske brytninger i idéhistoriefaget, Kristiansand: HøyskoleForlaget 2003
 Sven Arntzen & Otto M. Christensen:,“Hvor kommer idéhistorien fra”
 Dorthe Jørgensen, ”Hvad er idéhistorie?”
 Trond Berg Eriksen, ”Hvad kan idéhistorikere si om Norge?”
 Nils Gilje, ”Idéhistorie og folkekultur i den tidlig moderne perioden”
 Knut Ove Eliassen, ”En lav opplysning?”
 Sverre Bagge, ”Fra jordlapp og pengestykke til mentalitet og diskurs. Historiens
forhold til idéhistorien”
 Victoria Höög, ”Idéhistoria och den klassiska bildungstraditionen. Refleksioner
över humanioras framtid i det senmoderna samhället”
 Sven Arntzen, ”Arthur O. Lovejoy og idéhistorien”
 Arthur O. Lovejoy, ”Studiet av idéhistorien”
 Alan Finlayson, “Political Science, Political Ideas and Rhetoric”, Economy and Society, vol. 33,
no. 4, 2004, pp. 528-549
 “Editorial”, Modern Intellectual History, vol. 1, no. 1, 2004, pp. 1-2
 Marcus Llanque, ”Alte und neue Wege der politischen Ideengeschichte”, Neue politische
Literatur, vol. 49, 2004, pp. 34-51
 Kjetil Jakobsen, “Intellektuel historie og de intellektuelles historie”, ARR, no. 4, 2004, pp. 15-25
 Thomas Krogh, ”Idéhistorien og andre historier”, ARR, no. 4, 2004, pp. 27-33
 H.O. Christophersen, ”Noen bemerkninger om idéhistoriens innhold og metode”, ARR, no. 4,
2004, pp. 39-45
 Ingrid Markussen, ”På sporet af ideer”, ARR, no. 4, 2004, pp. 83-91
 Lloyd Kramer, “Intellectual History and Philosophy”, Modern Intellectual History, vol. 1, no. 1,
2004, pp. 81-95
 Carolyn Dean, “Intellectual History and the Prominence of Things that Matter”, Rethinking
History, vol. 8, no. 4, 2004, pp. 537-547
 Elizabeth A. Clark, “The New Intellectual History” + “Texts and Contexts, chaps. 6-7 in Clark,
History, Theory, Text. Historians and the Linguistic Turn, Cambridge, Mass. & London:
Harvard University Press 2004
 Reinhart Koselleck, Futures Past, New York: Columbia University Press 2004

24
 Sverker Sörlin, “Världens ordning”, in Sörlin, Världens ordning. Europas idéhistoria 1492-
1918, Stockholm: Natur och Kultur 2004
 Vidar Enebakk, ”Den norske idéhistoriens idéhistorie”, Nytt Norsk Tidsskrift, no. 3, 2005, pp.
271-286
 Donald R. Kelley, “Intellectual History in a Global Age”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 2005,
pp. 155-167
 Allan Megill, ”Globalization and the History of Ideas”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 2005,
pp. 179-187
 Joseph M. Levine, “Intellectual History as History”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 2005, pp.
189-200
 Allan Megill, “Intellectual History and History”, Rethinking History, vol. 8, no. 4, 2004, pp.
549-557
 Rafael Major, ”The Cambridge School and Leo Strauss: Texts and Context of American
Political Science”, Political Research Quarterly, vol. 58, no. 3, 2005, pp. 477-485
 Niklas Olsen, “Historien om de historiske grundbegreber”, www.historie-nu.dk, August 2005
 Jeppe Nevers, Kildekritikkens begrebshistorie. En undersøgelse af historiefagets metodelære,
Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag 2005
 Renée Jeffery, “Tradition as Invention: the ‘traditions tradition’ and the history of ideas in
international relations”, Millennium, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 57-84
 Kari Palonen, ”The Politics of Conceptual History”, Contributions, vol. 1, no. 1, 2005, pp. 37-
50
 Andreas Schinkel, “Imagination as a Category of History: An Essay concerning Koselleck’s
Concepts of Erfahrungsraum and Erwartungshorizont”, History and Theory, vol. 44, 2005, pp.
42-54
 Richard Macksey, “History of Ideas”, in Michael Groden, Martin Kreiswirth & Imre Szeman
(eds.), The Johns Hopkins Guide to Literary Theory and Criticism, 2. ed., Baltimore & London:
Johns Hopkins University Press 2005
 Melvin Richter, “More than a Two-Way Traffic: Analyzing, Translating, and Comparing
Political Concepts from Other Cultures”, Contributions, vol. 1, no. 1, 2005, pp. 7-20
 Robert Darnton, “Discourse and Diffusion”, Contributions, vol. 1, no. 1, 2005, pp. 21-28
 Quentin Skinner, “On Intellectual History and the History of Books”, Contributions, vol. 1, no.
1, 2005, pp. 29-36

25
 Martin J. Burke, “Conceptual History in the United States: A Missing “National Project””,
Contributions, vol. 1, no. 2, 2005, pp. 127-144
 Sandro Chignola, “Redescribing Political Concepts: History of Concepts and Politics”,
Contributions, vol. 1, no. 2, 2005, pp. 245-251
 Maryanne Cline Horowitz, “Preface”, in Horowitz (ed.), New Dictionary of the History of Ideas,
New York: Charles Schribner’s Sons 2005
 Donald R. Kelley, “Ideas, History of”, in Horowitz (ed.), New Dictionary of the History of
Ideas, vol. 3, New York: Charles Schribner’s Sons 2005
 Reinhart Koselleck, Begriffsgeschichten. Studien zur Semantik und Pragmatik der politischen
und sozialen Sprache, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 2006
 Pasi Ihalainen, ”Between historical semantics and pragmatics: Reconstructing past political
thought through conceptual history”, Journal of Historical Pragmatics, vol. 7, no. 1, 2006, pp.
115-143
 Harald Bluhm & Jürtgen Gebhardt, eds., Politische Ideengeschichte im 20. Jahrhundert, Baden-
Baden: Nomos 2006
o Harald Bluhm, ”Politische Ideengeschichte im 20. Jahrhundert. Einleitung”
o Reinhard Mehring, “Begriffssoziologie, Begriffsgeschichte, Begriffspolitik. Zur Form
der Ideengeschichtsschreibung nach Carl Schmitt und Reinhart Koselleck”
o Marcus Llanque, “Geschichte politischen Denkens oder Ideenpolitik: Ideengeschichte
als normative Traditionsstiftung”
o Rainer Schmidt, ”Ideengeschichte und Institutionentheorie. Begriffe, Diskurse und
institutionelle Mechanismen als Bausteine für ein Modell der
Ideengeschichtsschreibung”
o Matthias Bohlender, ”Michel Foucault – Für eine Geschichte und Kritik der politischen
Vernunft”
o Thilo Raufer, ”Ideengeschichte als Wirklichkeitswissenschaft”
o Clemens Kauffmann, “Anti-Traditionalismus: Die ‘ideengeschichtliche Programmatik’
von Leo Strauss”
o Grit Strassenberger, “Neoaristelismus und narravitische Wendungen politischer Theorie.
Hannah Arendt, Michael Walzer und Martha Craven Nussbaum”
o Alfons Söllner, “Die Emigration im Kontext – Eine Skizze zur politischen
Ideengeschichte des 20. Jahrhunderts”

26
 o Harald Bluhm, “Totalitarismus und antibürgerlicher Affekt. Furets Geschichte der
kommunistischen Idee im 20. Jahrhunderts”
o Martin Nonhoff, ”Politische Ideengeschichte und politische Hegemonie – Anmerkungen
zum ’Battle of the Books’ an den amerikanischen Colleges”
o Jürgen Gebhardt, “Politische Ideengeschichte im Zeichen des Methodenstreits – Eine
kritiske Bestandaufnahme”
 J.G.A. Pocock, “Theory in History: Problems of Context and Narrative”, in John S. Dryzek,
Bonnie Honig & Anne Phillips (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Theory, Oxford: Oxford
University Press 2006
 James Farr, “The History of Political Thought as Disciplinary Genre”, in John S. Dryzek,
Bonnie Honig & Anne Phillips (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Theory, Oxford: Oxford
University Press 2006
 Annabel Brett & James Tully (eds.), Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006
 Mark Goldie, “The Context of The Foundations”
 Holly Hamilton-Bleakley, “Linguistic Philosophy and The Foundations”
 J.G.A. Pocock, “Foundations and Moments”
 Marco Geuna, “Skinner, Pre-Humanist Rhetorical Culture and Machiavelli”
 Warren Boutcher, “Unoriginal Authors: How to Do Things with Texts in the
Renaissance”
 Cathy Curtis, “’The Best State of the Commonwealth’: Thomas More and
Quentin Skinner”
 H.M. Höpfl, “Scholasticism in Quentin Skinner’s Foundations”
 Annabel Brett, “Scholastic Political Thought and the Modern Concept of the
State”
 Martin van Gelderen, “’So merely humane’: Theories of Resistance in Early-
Modern Europe”
 Richard Tuck, “Hobbes and Democracy”
 Kinch Hoekstra, “A Lion in the House: Hobbes and Democracy”
 David Armitage, “Hobbes and the Foundations of Modern International
Thought”
 Quentin Skinner, “Surveying The Foundations: A Retrospect and Reassessment”

27
 Jonathan Israel, ”Historians and the Writing of ‘Intellectual History’”, in Israel, Enlightenment
Contested. Philosophy, Modernity, and the Emancipation of Man 1670-1752, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press 2006
 Richard Whatmore & Brian Yong (eds.), Palgrave Advances in Intellectual History,
Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan 2006
 John W. Burrow, “Intellectual History in English Academic Life”
 Brian Young, “Intellectual History in Britain”
 Abigail Williams, “Literary and Intellectual History”
 Lucy Hartley, “Intellectual History and the History of Art”
 Mishtooni Bose, “The Intellectual History of the Middle Ages”
 Richard Whatmore, “Intellectual History and the History of Political Thought”
 James Livesey, “Intellectual History and the History of Science”
 Deborah Madden, “Medicine, Science and Intellectual History”
 Brian Cowan, “Intellectual, Social and Cultural History: Ideas in Context”
 Rachel Foxley, “Gender and Intellectual History”
 Duncan Kelly, “The Politics of Intellectual History in Twentieth-Century
Europe”
 Terence Ball, “Must Political Theory Be Historical?”, Contributions, vol. 2, no. 1, 2006, pp. 7-
18
 Bo Stråth, “Ideology and History”, Journal of Political Ideologies, vol. 11, no. 1, 2006, pp. 23-
42
 Rudolf Valkhoff, ”Some Similarities between Begriffsgeschichte and the History of Discourse”,
Contributions, vol. 2, no. 1, 2006, pp. 83-98
 Javier Fernández Sebastián & Juan Francisco Fuentes, “Conceptual History, Memory and
Identity: An Interview with Reinhart Koselleck”, Contributions, vol. 2, no. 1, 2006, pp. 99-127
 Robert Burns (red.), Historiography. Critical Concepts in Historical Studies, vol. 3: Ideas,
London & New York: Routledge 2006
 Stefano Collini et. al., “What is Intellectual History?”
 Maurice Mandelbaum, “The History of Ideas, Intellectual History, and the
History of Philosophy”
 Ben Rogers, “Review Article: Philosophy for Historians: The Methodological
Writings of Quentin Skinner”

28
  Melvin Richter, “Begriffsgeschichte and the History of Ideas”
 David Harlan, “Intellectual History and the Return of Literature”
 Joyce Appleby, “One Good Turn Deserves Another: Moving Beyond the
Linguistic: A Response to David Harlan”
 Fritz Ringer, “The Intellectual Field, Intellectual History, and the Sociology of
Knowledge”
 Robert M. Burns, “Language, Tradition, and the Self in the Generation of
Meaning”
 Donald R. Kelley, Frontiers of History. Historical Inquiry in the Twentieth Century, New
Haven & London: Yale University Press 2006
 Emma Rotschild, “Arc of Ideas. International History and Intellectual History”, in Gunilla
Budde, Sebastian Conrad & Oliver Janz (eds.), Transnationale Geschichte. Themen, Tendenzen
und Theorien, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2006
 J.G.A. Pocock, Gordon Schochet & Lois G. Schwoerer, “The History of British Political
Thought: A Field and its Futures”, in David Armitage (ed.), British Political Thought in
History, Literature and Theory, 1500-1800, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006
 Richard E. Flathman, “Here and Now, There and Then, Always and Everywhere: Reflections
Concerning Political Theory and the Study/Writing of Political Thought”, in David Armitage
(ed.), British Political Thought in History, Literature and Theory, 1500-1800, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press 2006
 Slagmark – tidsskrift for idéhistorie, no. 47, 2006: Hans Blumenberg
 Hans Blumenberg: ”En antropologisk tilnærmelse til retorikkens aktualitet”
 Odo Marquard, ”Aflastning fra det absolutte – In memorian”
 Manfred Sommer, ”Beskrivelse af mennesket – Interview med Manfred
Sommer”
 Kasper Lysemose, ”Balancen mellem Husserl og Heidegger – den tidlige
Blumenbergs iagttagelser af fænomenologien”
 Ulrik Houlind Rasmussen, ”Metaforiseret kosmologi – eller hvordan Kopernikus
stillede et metaforisk potentiale til rådighed for det moderne menneskes
selvforståelse”
 Frank Beck Lassen, ”Hvad var det vi ville vide? – Hans Blumenbergs
metaforologi som læsestrategi”

29
 Anthony Grafton, “The History of Ideas: Precepts and Practice, 1950-200 and Beyond”, Journal
of the History of Ideas, 2006, pp. 1-32
 John Patrick Diggins, “Arthur O. Lovejoy and the Challenge of Intellectual History”, Journal of
the History of Ideas, 2006, pp. 181-208
 Robert Darnton, “’What is the History of Books’ Revisited”, Modern Intellectual History, vol.
4, no. 3, 2007, pp. 495-508
 Jason Edwards, “The Ideological Interpellation of Individuals as Combatants: An Encounter
Between Reinhart Koselleck and Michel Foucault”, Journal of Political Ideologies, vol. 12, no.
1, 2007, pp. 49-66
 Girt Strassenberger & Herfried Münkler, “Was das Fach zusammenhält. Die Bedeutung der
Politischen Theorie und Ideengeschichte für die Politikwissenschaft”, pp. 45-79 in Hubertus
Buchstein & Gerhard Göhler (eds.), Politische Theorie und Politikwissenschaft, Wiesbaden: VS
Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften 2007
 Gerhard Göhler, “Theorie als Erfahrung. Über den Stellenwert von politischer Philosophie und
Ideengeschichte für die Politikwissenschaft”, pp. 80-104 in Hubertus Buchstein & Gerhard
Göhler (eds.), Politische Theorie und Politikwissenschaft, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für
Sozialwissenschaften 2007
 Peter Thiergen, “Probleme russischer Begriffsgeschichte”, Studia Slavica, vol. 52, no. 1-2,
2007, pp. 403-412
 Emmanuelle Tricoire & Jacques Lévy, “Interview with Quentin Skinner: Concepts only have
histories”, 2007, www.espacestemps.net/document3692.html
 Allan Megill, Historical Knowledge, Historical Error: A Contemporary Guide to Practice,
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007
 Roger Chartier, “The Order of Books Revisited”, Modern Intellectual History, vol. 4, no. 3,
2007, pp. 509-519
 David D. Hall, “What was the History of Book? A Response”, Modern Intellectual History, vol.
4, no. 3, 2007, pp. 537-544
 Jotham Parsons, “Defining the History of Ideas”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 68, no. 4,
2007, pp. 683-699
 Branko Mitrovic, “Intellectual History, Inconceivability, and Methodological Holism”, History
and Theory, vol. 46, 2007, pp. 29-47
 Terence Ball, “Professor Skinner’s Visions”, Political Studies Review, vol. 5, 2007, pp. 351-364

30
 Victoria Fareld, “Contexts in Flux: Textual Concerns for the Historian of Ideas”, Ideas in
History, vol. 2, no. 3, 2007
 Slagmark – tidsskrift for idéhistorie, no. 48, 2007: Begrebshistorie
 Reinhart Koselleck, ”Dannelsens antropologiske og semantiske struktur”
 Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht, ”Åndens pyramider – om den begrebshistoriske
bevægelses hastige fremkomst, dens usynlige dimensioner og pludselige aftagen”
 Jan Ifversen, ”Begrebshistorien efter Reinhart Koselleck”
 Niklas Olsen, ”En partisan i kamp for historier i flertal – Reinhart Kosellecks
alternativ til historiefilosofien”
 Jeppe Nevers, ”Spørgsmålets politik – Kari Palonen og den nyere
begrebshistorie”
 Frank Beck Lassen, ”Tyveri! – til sekulariseringens semantik”
 Stine Grumsen & Hans Henrik Hjermitslev, ”Institut for Idéhistorie 1967-2004. Et studie af
institutionens oprettelse, udvikling og afvikling”, Slagmark – tidsskrift for idéhistorie, no. 50,
2007, pp. 96-124
 Jens Busck, Jeppe Nevers & Niklas Olsen (eds.), Reinhart Koselleck: Begreber, tid og erfaring,
København: Hans Reitzel 2007
 Javier Fernández Sebastián, ”Intellectual History, Liberty and Republicanism: An Interview
with Quentin Skinner”, Contributions to the History of Concepts, vol. 3, 2007, pp. 103-123
 Emile Perreau-Saussine, “Quentin Skinner in Context”, Review of Politics, vol. 69, 2007, pp.
106-122
 John E. Toews, “Integrating Music Into Intellectual History: Nineteenth-Century Art Music as a
Discourse of Agency and Identity”, Modern Intellectual History, vol. 5, no. 2, 2008, pp. 309-
331
 Marcus Llanque, “Einleitung: Ideengeschichte als Gewebe politischer Diskurse”, pp. 1-11 in
Llanque, Politische Ideengeschichte, München & Wien: Oldenbourg Verlag 2008
 Stefan Collini: “Intellectual History”, 2008,
www.history.ac.uk/makinghistory/resources/articles/intellectual_history.html
 Andrew Sartori, Bengal in Global Concept History, Chicago & London: University of Chicago
Press, chap. 1
 Mark Bevir, “What is Genealogy?”, vol. 2, 2008, pp. 263-275

31
 Ryan Walter, “Reconciling Foucault and Skinner on the State: The Primacy of Politics?”,
History of the Human Sciences, vol. 21, no. 3, 2008, pp. 94-114
 John Pocock, “Historiography and Political Thought”, Ideas in History, vol. 3, no. 3, 2008, pp.
81-100
 Kari Palonen, “John Pocock and Quentin Skinner. The Machiavellian and the Weberian
Moment”, Ideas in History, vol. 3, no. 3, 2008, pp. 61-79
 Thomas Krogh, “Time in History and in Politics – a Prominent Theme in the Works of John
Pocock”, Ideas in History, vol. 3, no. 3, 2008, pp. 33-59
 Danny Millum: “Making History Interview with Quentin Skinner”, April 2008,
http://www.history.ac.uk/makinghistory/resources/interviews/Skinner_Quentin.html
 Laszlo Kontler, “Translation and Comparison II: A Methodological Inquiry into Reception in
the History of Ideas”, Contributions, vol. 4, no. 1, 2008, pp. 27-56
 João Feres, “Taking Text Seriously: Remarks on the Methodology of the History of Political
Thought”, Contributions, vol. 4, no. 1, 2008, pp. 57-80
 Luca Scuccimarra, “Semantics of Time and Historical Experience: Remarks on Koselleck’s
Historik”, Contributions, vol. 4, no. 2, 2008, pp. 160-175
 Vicente Oieni & João Feres, “Conceptual History and Translation: An Interview with Melvin
Richter”, Contributions, vol. 4, no. 2, 2008, pp. 226-238
 Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen, “Making Sense of Conceptual Change”, History and Theory, vol. 47,
2008, pp. 351-372
 Niklas Luhmann, “Ideengeschichte in soziologischer Perspektive”, in Luhmann, Ideenevolution,
Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 2008 [1981]
 Günther Nonnenmacher, “Ideengeschichte zwischen Un-Sinn und Unmöglichkeit”, Politische
Vierteljahresschrift, vol. 22, 1981, pp. 423-431
 Alister Chapman, John Coffey & Brad S. Gregory, eds., Seeing Things Their Way. Intellectual
History and the Return of Religion, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press 2009
 Ian Ward, “Helping the Dead Speak: Leo Strauss, Quentin Skinner and the Arts of Interpretation
in Political Thought”, Polity, vol. 41, no. 2, 2009, pp. 235-255
 Pasi Ihalainen & Kari Palonen, “Parliamentary Sources in the Comparative Study of Conceptual
History: Methodological Aspects and Illustrations of a Research Proposal”, Parliaments,
Estates & Representation, vol. 29, 2009, pp. 17-34

32
 Dominick LaCapra, “Articulating Intellectual History, Cultural History, and Critical Theory”, in
LaCapra, History and its Limits. Human, Animal, Violence, Ithaca & London: Cornell
University Press 2009
 Dominick LaCapra, “Tropisms of Intellectual History”, in LaCapra, History and its Limits.
Human, Animal, Violence, Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press 2009
 Colin Tyler, “Performativity and the Intellectual Historian’s Re-Enactment of Written Words”,
Journal of the Philosophy of History, vol. 3, 2009, pp. 167-186
 Jan-Werner Müller, “The triumph of what (if anything)? Rethinking political ideologies and
political institutions in twentieth-century Europe”, Journal of Political Ideologies, vol. 14, no.
2, 2009, pp. 211-226
 Donald Winch, “Intellectual History and the History of Economic Thought: A Personal View”,
History of Economics Review, 2009, pp. 1-16
 Chris Goto-Jones, “The Kyoto School, the Cambridge School, and the History of Political
Philosophy in Wartime Japan”, Positions, vol. 17, no. 1, 2009, pp. 13-42
 Toby Reiner, “Texts as Performances: How to Reconstruct Webs of Beliefs from Expressed
Utterances”, Journal of the Philosophy of History, vol. 3, 2009, pp. 266-289
 J.G.A. Pocock, Political Thought and History. Essays on Theory and Method, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press 2009
 A.P. Martinich, “Four Senses of ‘Meaning’ in the History of Ideas: Quentin Skinner’s Theory of
Historical Interpretation”, Journal of the Philosophy of History, vol. 3, 2009, pp. 225-245
 Robert Lamb, “Recent Developments in the Thought of Quentin Skinner and the Ambitions of
Contextualism”, Journal of the Philosophy of History, vol. 3, 2009, pp. 246-265
 Mark Bevir, “Contextualism: From Modernist Method to Post-Analytic Historicism”, Journal of
the Philosophy of History, vol. 3, 2009, pp. 211-224
 Alexander Gallus, “’Intellectual History’ mit Intellektuellen und ohne sie. Facetten neuerer
geistesgeschichtliche Forschung”, Historische Zeitschrift, vol. 288, no. 1, 2009, pp. 139-150
 Richard Fisher, “How to Do Things with Books: Quentin Skinner and the Dissemination of
Ideas”, History of European Ideas, vol. 35, 2009, pp. 276-280
 Mikkel Thorup & Frank Beck Lassen (eds.), Quentin Skinner: Politik og Historie, København:
Hans Reitzel 2009

33
 Markku Hyrkkänen, “All History Is, More or Less, Intellectual History: R.G. Collingwood’s
Contribution to the Theory and Methodology of Intellectual History”, Intellectual History
Review, vol. 19, no. 2, 2009, pp. 251-263
 Sonja Asal, Frank Druffner & Valentin Groebner, ”Wie frei sind wir wirklich? Fragen an
Quentin Skinner”, Zeitschrift für Ideengeschichte, no. 2, 2009, pp. 5-21
 William Walker, “J.G.A. Pocock and the History of British Political Thought: Assessing the
State of the Art”, Eighteenth-Century Life, vol. 33, no. 1, 2009, pp. 83-96
 Robert Lamb, “Quentin Skinner’s Revised Historical Contextualism: A Critique”, History of the
Human Sciences, vol. 22, no. 3, 2009, pp. 51-73
 Hubert Locher, “Denken in Bildern. Reinhart Kosellecks Program Zur politischen Ikonologie”,
Zeitschrift für Ideengeschichte, no. 4, 2009, pp. 81-96
 Elías José Palti, “From Ideas to Concepts to Metaphors: The German Tradition of Intellectual
History and the Complex Fabric of Language”, History and Theory, vol. 49, 2010, pp. 194-211
 Stefan-Ludwig Hoffmann, “Koselleck, Arendt, and the Anthropology of Historical Experience”,
History and Theory, vol. 49, 2010, pp. 212-236
 Daniel Schulz & Alexander Weiss, “Introduction: Approaches in the History of Political
Thought”, European Political Science, vol. 9, 2010, pp. 283-290
 Ulrike Höppner, “Thinking in Turbulent Times: On the Relevance of Sixteenth-Century
Political Thought”, European Political Science, vol. 9, 2010, pp. 291-302
 Efraim Podoksik, “How is Modern Intellectual History Possible? ”, European Political Science,
vol. 9, 2010, pp. 304-315
 Uffe Jakobsen, “Inventions and Developments of Democracy: the Approach of Conceptual
History”, European Political Science, vol. 9, 2010, pp. 316-327
 Sudipta Kaviraj, ”Said and the History of Ideas”, in Sugata Bose & Kris Manjapra (eds.),
Cosmopolitan Thought Zones, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan 2010
 Mikkel Thorup & Frank Beck Lassen, “Tekstfortolkeren. Interview med Quentin Skinner”,
Slagmark – tidsskrift for idéhistorie, no. 57, 2010, pp. 171-189
 Timo Pankaloski, ”Conflict, Context, Concreteness: Koselleck and Schmitt on Concepts”,
Political Theory, vol. 38, no. 6, 2010, pp. 749-779
 David A. Hollinger, “American Intellectual History, 1907-2007”, in James M. Banner (ed.), A
Century of American Historiography, Boston & New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s 2010

34
 J.G.A. Pocock, “Historiography as a Form of Political Thought”, History of European Ideas,
vol. 37, 2010, pp. 1-6
 Barbara Stollberg-Rilinger, ed., Ideengeschichte, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag 2010
o Barbara Stollberg-Rilinger: ”Einleitung”
o Arthur O. Lovejoy, ”Die Beschäftigung mit der Ideengeschichte
o Quentin Skinner, ”Bedeutung und Verstehen in der Ideengeschichte”
o John G.A. Pocock, ”The Concept of a Language and the métier d’historien: some
considerations on practice”
o Reinhart Koselleck, “Begriffsgeschichte und Sozialgeschichte”
o Thomas S. Kuhn, “Die Struktur wissenschaftlicher Revolutionen”
o Georges Duby, “Mentalitätengeschichte”
o Michel Foucault, “Die Ordnung des Diskurses”
o Niklas Luhmann, “Gesellschaftliche Struktur und semantiche Tradition”
 Riccardo Bavaj, “Intellectual History”, 2010, http://docupedia.de/zg/Intellectual_History
 George Klosko, ed., The Oxford Handbook of the History of Political Philosophy, Oxford:
Oxford University Press 2011
o Mark Bevir, “The Contextual Approach”
o Catherine Zuckert, “The Straussian Approach”
o Joshua Foa Dienstag, “Postmodern Approaches to the History of Political Thought”
o Terence Ball, “The Value of the History of Political Philosophy”
o John Gunnell, “History of Political Philosophy as a Discipline”
 Pierre Force, “The Teeth of Time: Pierre Hadot on Meaning and Misunderstanding in the
History of Ideas”, History and Theory, vol. 50, 2011, pp. 20-40
 Javier Fernández Sebatián (ed.), Political Concepts and Time. New Approaches to Conceptual
History, Santander: Cantabria University Press & McGraw-Hill Interamericana de España
o Javier Fernández Sebastián, “Introduction: the relevance of conceptual history”
o Hans Erich Bödeker, “Begriffsgeschichte as the history of theory: the history of theory
as begriffsgeschichte: an essay”
o Elías José Palti, “From ideas to concepts to metaphors: the german tradition of
intellectual history and the complex fabric of language”
o Michael Freeden, “Ideology and conceptual history: the interrelationship between
method and meaning”

35
 o Peter Burke, “The cultural history of intellectual practices: an overview”
o Alexandre Escudier, “’Temporalization’ and political modernity: a tentative
systematization of the work of Reinhart Koselleck”
o Kari Palonen, “Contingency, political theory and conceptual history”
o Pim den Boer, “National cultures, transnational concepts: begriffsgeschichte beyond
conceptual nationalism”
o Joâo Feres Júnio, “With an eye on future research: the theoretical layers of conceptual
history”
o Jörn Leonard, “Language, experience and translation: towards a comparative dimension”
o Christian Meier, “Reinhart Koselleck. A commemorative speech”
o European Conceptual History Project. Mission Statement
 Roger Chartier, “History, Time, and Space”, Republics of Letters, vol. 2, no. 2, 2011, pp.1-13
 Jan-Werner Müller, “European Intellectual History as Contemporary History”, Journal of
Contemporary History, vol. 46, no. 3, 2011, pp. 574-590
 Petri Koikkalainen, “Contextualist dilemmas”, History of European Ideas, vol. 37, 2011, pp.
315-324
 Martin Saar, “Relocating the Modern State: Governmentality and the History of Ideas”, in
Ulrich Bröckling, Susanne Krasmann & Thomas Lemke (eds.), Governmentality. Current Issues
and Future Challenges, London & New York: Routledge 2011
 Naja Vucina, Claus Drejer & Peter Triantafillou, “Histories and freedom of the present:
Foucault and Skinner”, History of the Human Sciences, vol. 25, no. 5, 2011, pp. 124-141
 Martin Jay, “Historical Explanation and the Event: Reflections on the Limits of
Contextualization”, New Literary History, vol. 42, 2011, pp. 557-571
 Allan Megill, “Five Questions on Intellectual History”, Rethinking History, vol. 15, no. 14,
2011, pp. 489-510
 Reinhart Koselleck, “Introduction and Prefaces to the Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe”,
Contributions, vol. 6, no. 1, 2011, pp. 1-37
 Nikolay Koposov, “Collective Singulars. A Reinterpretation”, Contributions, vol. 6, no. 1,
2011, pp- 39-64
 Jan Ifversen, “About Key Concepts and How to Study Them”, Contributions, vol. 6, no. 1,
2011, pp. 65-88

36
 “The European Conceptual History Project (ECHP): Mission Statement”, Contributions, vol. 6,
no. 1, 2011, pp. 111-116
 Peter Ghosh, “Hugh Trevor-Roper and the history of ideas”, History of European Ideas, vol. 37,
2011, pp. 483-505
 Teresa Bejan, “Interview: Quentin Skinner on Meaning and Method”, The Art of Theory, 2011,
http://www.artoftheory.com/quentin-skinner-on-meaning-and-method/
 Teresa Bejan, “Interview: Quentin Skinner in Context”, The Art of Theory, 2011,
http://www.artoftheory.com/quentin-skinner-in-context/
 Symposium on Quentin Skinner, from Method to Politics, , Journal of the History of Ideas, vol.
73, no. 1, 2012
o Melissa Lane, “Doing Our Own Thinking for Ourselves: On Quentin Skinner’s
Genealogical Turn”
o Bryan Garsten, “Liberalism and the Rhetorical Vision of Politics”
o Nadia Urbinati, “Republicanism after the French Revolution: The Case of Sismonde
Sismondi”
o Philip Petitt, “Freedom in Hobbes’s Ontology and Semantics: A Comment on Quentin
Skinner”
o Quentin Skinner, “On the Liberty of the Ancients and the Moderns: A Reply to My
Critics”
 Forum on the Present and Future of American Intellectual History, Modern Intellectual History,
vol. 9, no. 1, 2012, pp. 149-248
o Thomas Bender: “Forum: the Present and Future of American Intellectual History,
Introduction”
o Leslie Butler: “From the History of Ideas to Ideas in History”
o David A. Hall: “Backwards to the Future: the Cultural Turn and the Wisdom of
Intellectual History”
o David A. Hollinger: “What is Our ‘Canon’? How American Intellectual Historians
Debate the Core of their Field”
o James T. Kloppenberg: “Thinking Historically: A Manifesto of Pragmatic
Hermeneutics”
o Joan Shelley Rubin: “Nixon’s Grin and other Keys to the Future of Cultural and
Intellectual History”

37
 o Jeffrey Sklansky: “The Elusive Sovereign: New Intellectual and Social Histories of
Capitalism”
 “Forum: History of Political Thought”, German History, vol. 30, 2012, no. 1, pp. 75-99
 Jeffrey Edward Green, “On the Difference Between a Pupil and a Historian of Ideas”, Journal
of the Philosophy of History, vol. 6, 2012, pp. 84-110
 Margrit Pernau, “Whither Conceptual History? From National to Entangled Histories”,
Contributions, vol. 7, no. 1, 2012, pp. 1-11
 Myoung-Kyu Park, “Conceptual History in Korea: Its Developments and Prospects”,
Contributions, vol. 7, no. 1, 2012, pp. 36-50
 David Armitage, ”What’s the Big Idea? Intellectual History and the Longue Durée”, History of
European Ideas, vol. 38, no. 4, 2012, pp. 493-507
 Mikkel Thorup: ”Intellektuel historie”, Temp, no. 4, 2012, pp. 177-189
 “Symposium: Assessing and Extending The Logic of the History of Ideas”, Journal of the
History of Ideas, vol. 73, no. 4, 2012
o Daniel I. O’Neill, “Revisiting the Middle Way: The Logic of the History of Ideas after
More Than a Decade”
o Martyn P. Thompson, “The Logic of the History of Ideas: Mark Bevir and Michael
Oakeshott”
o A. P. Martinich, “A Moderate Logic of the History of Ideas”
o Sara R. Jordan & Cary J. Nederman, ” The Logic of the History of Ideas and the Study of
Comparative Political Theory”
o Amit Ron, “The Logic of the Historian and the Logic of the Citizen”
o Mark Bevir, “Post-Analytic Historicism”
 Hans-Jørgen Schanz, ”Hvorfor er idéhistorie vigtig?”, November 2012,
http://baggrund.com/hvorfor-er-idehistorie-vigtig/
 Frank Beck Lassen, “Afselvfølgeliggørelse – idéhistoriens raison d’etre”,. November 2012,
http://baggrund.com/afselvfolgeliggorelse-idehistoriens-raison-detre/
 Mikkel Thorup, ”Intellektuel historie – idéhistorien i dag”, November 2012,
http://baggrund.com/intellektuel-historie-idehistorien-i-dag/
 Christopher Fear, ”The question-and-answer logic of historical context”, History of the Human
Sciences, vol. 26, no. 3, 2013, pp. 68-81

38
 Stefanie Gänger & Su Lin Lewis, “Forum: a world of ideas: new pathways in global intellectual
history, c. 1880-1930”, Modern Intellectual History, vol. 10, no. 2, 2013, pp. 347-351
 Andreas Busen & Alexander Weiss, eds., Ansätze und Methoden zur Erforschung politischen
Denkens, Baden-Baden: Nomos 2013
o Andreas Busen & Alexander Weiss, ”Einleitung”
o Andreas Busen & Alexander Weiss, ”Ansätze und Methoden zur Erforschung
politischen Denkens: The State of the Art?”
o Jens Olesen, “Quentin Skinners Methode – Zwischen Intentionen und Konventionen”
o Katharina Schneider, “Arnold Ruges doppeltes Spiel. Zu Möglichkeiten und Grenzen
der methode Quentin Skinners in der Analyse zensurflüchtiger Schriften”
o David Egner, ”Begriffsgeschichte und Begriffssoziologie. Zur Methodik und Historik
Carl Schmitts und Reinhart Kosellecks”
o Rieke Schäfer, “Politische Metaphern und Bedeutungswandel”
o Johannes Thumfart, “Ideengeschichte – Archäologie – Topik. Von der Methodendebatte
Skinners und Foucaults zurück zu den Ideen”
o Robert Feustel, “Intervention als Methode. Zum Verhältnis von Diskursanalyse und
politischer Ideengeschichte”
o Daniel Kuchler, ”Bedingt Analytischer Textzentrismus. Eine Kritik an Skinners
Kontextualismus”
o Ulf Bohmann, ”Charles Taylors Mentalitätsgeschichte als kritische Genealogie”
o Jörn Knobloch, “Die Kultur politischer Ideen. Methodische Implikationen einer
politischen Praxeologie”
o Maike Weisspflug, “Tigersprung ins Vergangene. Aktualisierung und Kritik als Problem
der politischen Ideengeschichte”
o Veith Selk, ”Angst und Methode in der Sozialwissenschaft. Konsequenzen für die
Politische Theorie und Ideengeschichte”
o Jörg Probst, ”Politik der Bilder. Franz Josef Strauss, Heinrich Wölfflin und die
Ikonologie der Ideengeschichte”
o Holger Zapf, ”Kultur als Konstrukt? Methoden einer transkulturell orientierten
Politischen Theorie”
o Martin Saar, ”Nachwort: Text, Interpretation, Diskontinuität. Methodenprobleme der
politischen Ideengeschichte”

39
 Mikkel Thorup, Morten Haugaard Jeppesen & Frederik Stjernfelt (eds.), Intellectual History. 5
Questions, Copenhagen: Automatic Press 2013
 Samuel Moyn & Andrew Sartori (eds.), Global Intellectual History, New York: Columbia
University Press 2013
o Samuel Moyn & Andrew Sartori, “Approaches to Global Intellectual History”
o Siep Stuurman, “Common Humanity and Cultural Difference on the Sedentary –
Nomadic Frontier: Herodotus, Sima Qian, and Ibn Khaldun”
o Sheldon Pollock, “Cosmopolitanism, Vernacularism, and Premodernity”
o Vanessa Smith, “Joseph Bank’s Intermediaries: Rethinking Global Cultural Exchange”
o Andrew Sartori, “Global Intellectual History and the History of Political Economy”
o Christopher L. Hill, “Conceptual Universalization in the Transnational Nineteenth
Century”
o Cemil Aydin, “Globalizing the Intellectual History of the Idea of the ‘Muslim World’”
o Samuel Moyn, “On the Nonglobalization of Ideas”
o Mamadou Diouf & Jinny Prais, “’Casting the Badge of Inferiority Beneath Black
Peoples’ Feet’: Archiving and Reading the African Past, Present, and Future in World
History
o Janaki Bakhle, “Putting Global Intellectual History in Its Place”
o Duncan Bell, “Making and Taking Worlds”
o Frederick Cooper, “How Global Do We Want Our Intellectual History to Be?”
o Sudipta Kaviraj, “Global Intellectual History: Meanings and Methods”
 David Armitage, “The international turn in intellectual history”, chap. 1 in Foundations of
modern international thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2013
 Kenneth Sheppard, “Telling Contested Stories: JGA Pocock and Paul Ricoeur”, History of
European Ideas, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 879-898
 Allan Megill and Xupeng Zhang, “Questions on the history of ideas and its neighbours”
Rethinking History, 2013, pp. 1-21
 Brian Kjær Olesen, Jonas Gerlings, Kaarlo Havu, Daniel Knegt, Matti La Mela & Thomas Ø.
Wittendorff, “Doing things with intellectual history: Interview with Martin van Gelderen”,
Zeitenblicke, vol. 12, no. 1, 2013, www.zeitenblicke.de/2013/1/Gelderen
 Slagmark, no. 67, 2013: Ny idéhistorie
o Frank Beck Lassen, “Afselvfølgeliggørelse – idéhistoriens raison d’etre”

40
 o Roger Chartier, ”Historien – eller om at læse tiden”
o David Dunér, ”Den kognitiva vändningen”
o Mikkel Thorup, ”Taget ud af sammenhæng – om kontekst i idéhistorie”
o Mark Bevir, ”Kontekstualisme – fra modernistisk metode til post-analytisk
historicisme?”
o David Armitage, ”Hvad er den store idé? – intellektuel historie og longue durée”
 Cesare Cuttica, ”Eavesdropper on the Past: John W. Burrow (1935-2009), Intellectual History
and Its Future”, History of European Ideas, vol. 40, no. 7, 2014, pp. 905-924
 Sarah Hutton, “Intellectual History and the History of Philosophy”, , History of European Ideas,
vol. 40, no. 7, 2014, pp. 925-937
 David Garland, “What is a ‘history of the present?’ On Foucault’s genealogies and their critical
preconditions”, Punishment & Society, vol. 16, no. 4, 2014, pp. 365-384
 Andreas Mahler & Martin Mulsow, eds., Texte zur Theorie der Ideengeschichte, Stuttgart:
Reclam 2014
o Andreas Mahler & Martin Mulsow, “Einleitung: die Vielfalt der Ideengeschichte”
o Wilhelm Dilthey, “Archive der Literatur/Die Typen der Weltanschauung und ihre
Ausbildung in den metaphysischen Systemen”
o Max Weber, “Die Objektivität sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer
Erkenntnis”
o Ernst Cassirer, ”Das Erkenntnissproblem in der Philosophie und Wissenschaft der
neueren Zeit”
o Karl Mannheim, ”Ideologische und soziologische Interpretation der geistigen Gebilde”
o Arthur O. Lovejoy, ”Die Beschäftigung mit der Ideengeschichte”
o Quentin Skinner, ”Bedeutung und Verstehen in der Ideengeschichte”
o Michel Foucault, ”Archäologie des Wissens”
o Reinhart Koselleck, “Begriffsgeschichte und Sozialgeschichte”
o Hans Blumenberg, “Ausblick auf eine Theorie der Unbegrifflichkeit”
o Niklas Luhmann, “Gesellschaftliche Struktur und semantische Tradition”
o Richard Rorty, “Vier Formen des Schreibens von Philosophiegeschichte”
o John G.A. Pocock, “Der Begriff einer ‘Sprache’ und das métier d’historien: Einige
Überlegungen zur Praxis”
o Roger Chartier, “Kulturgeschichte zwischen Repräsentationen und Praktiken”

41
 o Ian Hacking, ”Historische Ontologie”
o Christopher Bayly, ”Globale Intellektualgeschichte”
o Peter Burke, ”Die Kulturgeschichte intellektueller Praktiken”
 Ralph Weber & Martin Beckstein, Politische Ideengeschichte. Interpretations-ansätze in der
Praxis, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2014
 Darrin McMahon & Samuel Moyn (eds.), Rethinking Modern European Intellectual History,
Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014
o Darrin McMahon & Samuel Moyn, “Introduction: Interim Intellectual History”
o Darrin McMahon, “The Return of the History of Ideas?”
o Peter E. Gordon, “Contextualism and Criticism in the History of Ideas”
o Antoine Lilti, “Does Intellectual History Exist in France? The Chronicle of a
Renaissance Foretold”
o Jan-Werner Müller, “On Conceptual History”
o Judith Surkis, “Of Scandals and Supplements: Relating Intellectual and Cultural
History”
o Samuel Moyn, “Imaginary Intellectual History”
o Suzanne Marchand, “Has the History of Disciplines Had its Day?”
o John Tresch, “Cosmologies Materialized: History of Science and History of Ideas”
o Tracie Matysik, “Decentering Sex: Reflections on Freud, Foucault, and Subjectivity in
Intellectual History”
o Marci Shore: “Can We See Ideas?: On Evocation, Experience, and Empathy”
o John Randolph, “The Space of Intellect and the Intellect of Space”
o David Armitage, “The International Turn in Intellectual History”
o Shruti Kapila, “Global Intellectual History and the Indian Political”
o Warren Breckman, “Intellectual History and the Interdisciplinary Ideal”
 Glenda Sluga, “Turning International: Foundations of Modern International Thought and New
Paradigms for Intellectual History, History of European Ideas, vol. 41, no. 1, 2015, pp. 103-115
 Petri Koikkalainen, “The Politics of Contextualism. Normativity and the New Historians of
Political Thought”, Journal of the Philosophy of History, vol. 9, 2015, pp. 347-371
 Thomas Krogh, “History of Ideas: An Idea and its History”, pp. 83-106 in Jan Eivind Myhre
(ed.), Boundaries of History, Oslo: Scandinavian Academic Press 2015
 Richard Whatmore, What is Intellectual History?, Cambridge: Polity 2016

42
 Richard Whatmore & Brian Yong (eds.), A Companion to Intellectual History, Malden &
Oxford: Wiley Blackwell 2016
o Brian Yong, “Introduction”
o Stefan Collini, “The Identity of Intellectual History”
o Brian Young, “Intellectual History and Historismus in Post-War England”
o Cesare Cuttica, “Intellectual History in the Modern University”
o Edward Baring, “Intellectual History and Poststructuralism”
o Keith Tribe, “Intellectual History as Begriffsgeschichte”
o Jacob Soll, “Intellectual History and History of the Book”
o Michael Drolet, “Michel Foucault and the Genealogy of Power and Knowledge”
o Richard Whatmore, “Quentin Skinner and the Relevance of Intellectual History”
o Kenneth Sheppard, “JGA Pocock as an Intellectual Historian”
o Leo Catana, “Intellectual History and the History of Philosophy: Their Genesis and
Current Relationship”
o Duncan Kelly, “Intellectual History and the History of Political Thought”
o John FM Clark, “Intellectual History and the History of Science”
o Donald Winch, “Intellectual History and the History of Economics”
o Katharina Lorenz, “Art History and Intellectual History”
o Andrew Sartori, “Intellectual History and Global History”
o John W. Cairns, “Intellectual History and Legal History”
o Peter E. Gordon, “The Idea of Secularisation in Intellectual History”

43