Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Preliminary THIRD
EDITION
Paul Milgate
Kate Dally
Phil Webster
Daryl Le Cornu
Tim Kelly
www.cambridge.edu.au
Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9781107650787
© Paul Milgate, Kate Dally, Phil Webster, Daryl Le Cornu and Tim Kelly 2013
Please be aware that this publication may contain images of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples now
deceased. Several variations of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander terms and spellings may also appear. No
disrespect is intended. Please note that the terms ‘Indigenous Australians’ and ‘Aboriginal and Torres Strait
Islander peoples’ may be used interchangeably in this publication.
C H A P T E R 1 – BA S I C L E G A L CO N C E P T S 4
C H A P T E R 2 – S O U R C E S O F CO N T E M P O R A RY AUS T R ALI AN L AW 18
C H A P T E R 3 – C L A SS I FI C AT I O N O F L AW 58
iii
C H A P T E R 5 – L AW R E FO R M I N AC T I O N 92
C H A P T E R 6 – YO U R R I G H T S A N D R E S P O N S I B I L I T I E S 126
Contents
Chapter summary 159
C H AP T E R 8 – CO N T E M P O R A RY I SS U E: T H E I N D I V I D UA L A N D T E C H N O LO G Y 160
C H AP T E R 9 – C H I L D R E N A N D YO U N G PE O PLE 184
Additional information on groups or individuals suffering disadvantage: Children and young people
Introduction
Migrants and the law
Mechanisms for achieving justice for migrants
The responsiveness of the legal system to migrants and applicants
Future directions
Chapter summary
Introduction
The legal status of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples before 1967
Mechanisms for achieving justice for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples
Responsiveness of the legal system to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples
Conclusion
Chapter summary
Contents
Introduction
People who have a mental illness or an intellectual disability and the law
Mechanisms for achieving justice for people who have a mental illness or an intellectual disability
Responsiveness of the legal system to efforts to achieve justice for people who have a mental illness
or an intellectual disability
Conclusion
Chapter summary
C H A P T E R 11 – T H E BA L I B O M B I N G S 226
Additional information on events which highlight legal issues: The Bali bombings
C H A P T E R 12 – T H E P O R T A R T H U R M A SSAC R E 242
vii
ISBN 9781107650787 © Paul Milgate et al 2013 Cambridge University Press
Photocopying is restricted under law and this material must not be transferred to another party.
Available free on Cambridge GO
Additional information on events which highlight legal issues: The Port Arthur Massacre
C H AP T E R 20 – E V E N T S T H AT H I G H L I G H T LE G A L I SS U E S: T H E Q U E E N S L A N D FLO O D S
Introduction
The Queensland floods
Mechanisms for achieving justice after the floods
Legal responses to the floods
Conclusion
Chapter summary
C H A P T E R 13 – M O H A M E D H A N E E F 258
C H AP T E R 14 – O U T L AW M OTO R C YC L E G A N G S 276
C H A P T E R 22 – I N D I V I D UA L S O R G R O U P S I N CO N FLI C T W I T H T H E S TAT E:
T H E N O R T H E R N T E R R I TO RY I N T E RV E N T I O N
Contents
The Northern Territory Intervention
Mechanisms for achieving justice in relation to The Northern Territory Intervention
Responsiveness of the law
Conclusion
Chapter summary
C H A P T E R 15 – FI L E -S H A R I N G A N D D I G I TA L CO PY R I G H T 296
C H AP T E R 16 – D R U G T E S T I N G 314
C H A P T E R 23 – C R I M I N A L O R C I V I L C A S E S T H AT R AI S E I SS U E S O F I N T E R E S T TO
S T U D E N T S: FAC E B O O K PR I VAC Y I SS U E S
Introduction
Mechanisms for achieving justice in privacy issues
Responsiveness of the law
Conclusion
Chapter summary
ix
ISBN 9781107650787 © Paul Milgate et al 2013 Cambridge University Press
Photocopying is restricted under law and this material must not be transferred to another party.
About the authors
Paul Milgate DipTeach BEd and Grad Cert in Theology, is leader of Pedagogy and for the past 12 years has been
the Head Teacher of the HSIE (Human Society and Its Environment) Faculty at Xavier Catholic College, on the
North Coast of NSW. He has extensive experience in Legal Studies, having taught it since its inception, and also
provides funding and assists in the planning and running of legal seminar days in collaboration with Southern
Cross University Faculty of Law and Justice.
Kate Dally BA DipEd is Head Teacher of Social Sciences at Birrong Girls High School in Sydney. She has
extensive teaching experience, having taught Social Sciences for the past 22 years. Kate’s experience also
covers HSC marking in both Legal Studies and Business Studies. She has written for Success One Business
Studies for a number of years.
Phil Webster BA DipEd MEd MACE is Head Teacher of Social Science at Mosman High. He has over 20 years’
experience in HSIE as a teacher of Legal Studies, Society and Culture, and Business Studies, with a particular
interest in the changing role of law in society. Phil is passionate about issues of human rights, justice and
fairness in a rapidly changing world.
Dr Daryl Le Cornu BA(Hons) DipEd PhD was recently the Senior Curriculum Support Officer for HSIE in NSW.
He has many years of experience teaching both Legal Studies and Modern History. He has a passion for the
teaching of human rights, the United Nations, global governance and contemporary history, as well as the
promotion of student-run human rights groups within schools. Daryl is the Education Officer for the WCAA
(World Citizens Association of Australia) and is a member of ACUNS (Academic Council on the United Nations
System).
Tim Kelly BA DipEd DipLaw obtained his BA DipEd from the University of New South Wales in 1984 and
completed his Diploma in Law from the Legal Practitioners Admissions Board in 1996. He began teaching
Legal Studies in 1993 at St Mary’s Maitland. Since 1998, Tim has been the HSIE Coordinator at St Mary’s in
Casino and is currently an Education Officer for the Lismore Catholic Schools Office. Tim is also a tutor in
HSIE Curriculum Specialisation at Southern Cross University and is a current HSC marker for Legal Studies.
Thanks to my wife, Barbara, my daughter, Ebony, and my son, Zach – a great team!
Paul Milgate
Thanks to all of my family and friends who put up with me as I wrote my chapters.
Kate Dally
To the boys at Hells Angels MC – thanks for your assistance with OMCGs. To Katie Wood at Amnesty – huge thanks for your support
and research. Tristan Tipps Webster – the ATSI guru – many thanks.
Phil Webster
Love to Salty, Jack, Hannah and, of course, Nana and Keg! Ssshhh – don’t tell anyone about Diggers.
Tim Kelly
Many thanks to the team at Redfern Legal Centre and Elaine Johnson from the NSW Environmental Defender’s Office for their tireless
effort in reviewing this title. Our gratitude must also go to Nicholas Gangemi, Barrister-at-Law, who reviewed this book and the
accompanying Teacher Resource material.
The publishers
xi
To the student
Congratulations on choosing Cambridge Legal Studies Preliminary Cambridge Legal Studies – Preliminary (Third Edition) is a
Third Edition. This edition has been updated to meet the changing comprehensive resource that introduces you to a dynamic and
processes of the legal system and the requirements of the current challenging subject. It brings the law to life for you, both inside
Stage 6 Legal Studies Syllabus in New South Wales. and outside the classroom.
Legal Studies was first introduced into the NSW Curriculum You will discover a wealth of material that introduces you to
in 1989. Since then, thousands of students have finished their the Australian legal system and how the individual interacts with
secondary schooling as better informed citizens who are able to and is affected by the law, and will gain insight into how the law
think critically about the processes and institutions that shape works in practice in a variety of contexts. You will be engaged
their lives on a daily basis. and stimulated by up-to-date case law and recent legislative
The rights people enjoy within democratic societies can at developments. Practically, updated research and review activities
times be eroded by governments when electorates become will help you build your research skills and make sure that you are
apathetic about their freedoms and liberties. Legal Studies ready for your exam.
will allow you to explore the power vested in our democratic We wish you luck and success.
institutions and wielded by our elected leaders. It explores issues
that will challenge the way you see the world and how you
understand the concept of achieving justice through the law.
The Cambridge Legal Studies – Preliminary resource package 4 Teacher Resource Package
consists of five components.
The Teacher Resource Package contains a wide range of materials
to support students and teachers, with course, lesson and teaching
1 Student Book
plans, and assessment and homework preparation.
The Student Book contains all topics in Part I, Part II (including
additional topics under Law Reform in Action) and a range of 5 Interactive Textbook
contemporary high-interest topics in Part III.
A version of the student text has been optimised to be read on
screen through an internet browser. It delivers a host of interactive
2 Cambridge GO
features to enhance the teaching and learning experience of the
The Cambridge Legal Studies access to GO gives students a free student text. The Interactive Textbook includes:
online resource that contains: ➥ drag-and-drop activities
➥ two additional chapters for Part III – Migrants and Aboriginal ➥ multiple-choice quizzes at the end of each chapter
and Torres Strait Islanders ➥ multimedia presentations to reinforce learning
➥ additional resources for Chapters 8–12 ➥ audio footage to help bring concepts to life
➥ marking criteria for the Extended Response Questions from ➥ additional chapters including:
the Study Toolkit • Part I: The legal system
➥ weblinks - Chapter 5 Law reform and action – Topic 4: Young
➥ additional resources. drivers and the law
• Part III: Law in practice
3 Study Toolkit - Chapter 19 – People who have a mental illness or an
The Study Toolkit, packaged with the Student Book, contains intellectual disability
a wide range of materials to help you succeed in Legal Studies, - Chapter 20 – Events that highlight a legal issue:
➥ legal research tips and information to help you understand state: The Northern Territory Intervention
case citations. - Chapter 23 – Criminal or civil cases that raise issues of
interest to students.
Guide to Icons
This icon lets you know that there is additional This icon lets you know that there is extra material
information available on Cambridge GO. available in the Interactive Textbook.
This icon lets you know that you will need to access
the internet in order to complete an activity or
research task.
xiii
Chapter openers
PART I
Each chapter of Cambridge Legal Studies –
Chapter 1
that contains:
Chapter objectives
In this chapter, students will:
➔ identify and apply legal concepts and terminology ➔ discuss the nature of justice in terms of equality, fairness
➥ chapter objectives
➔ identify the changing nature of law and access
➔ describe the interrelationship between customs, rules ➔ discuss the concept of procedural fairness and the rule of law
and laws ➔ discuss the concepts of anarchy and tyranny
➔ explain the relationship between the legal system ➔ communicate legal information by using well-structured
➥ key terms
and society responses.
Key terms/vocabulary
anarchy
equality
ethics
legal system
nation-state
rules
sanctions
legislation customs
doli incapax
justice
law
procedural fairness
rule of law
values
➥ odd law (in Chapters 1–8). S 56 of the Crimes Act 1900 states:
Whosoever by threats or force prevents, or endeavours to prevent, any members of the clergy, or other person duly authorised in that
behalf, from officiating in a place of divine worship, or from the performance of his or her duty in the lawful burial of the dead in a
burial place, or strikes or offers any violence to, any member of the clergy, or minister engage in, or to the knowledge of the offender
about to engage in, any of the duties aforesaid, or going to perform the same, shall be liable to imprisonment for two years.
Media Clip
PART III
Media Clip Review 15.3
A number of current media articles are Most pirates say they’d pay for legal downloads
Law in practice
6 May 2010
4 Do you think that people have unrealistic expectations
provided to help you understand how MOST people who illegally download movies, music and TV
shows would pay for them if there was a cheap and legal service
as convenient as file-sharing tools like BitTorrent.
‘I think what it comes down to is freedom,’ he said.
‘They just want to know that they’ve got the data, they can
watch it whenever they want, on whatever device they want,
More than two-thirds of respondents in news.com.au’s
survey said they would be prepared to pay for movies through
a convenient legal download service. 5
about the prices that they are willing to pay? Justify your
answer.
Given that this survey was carried out in 2010, do you
That’s the finding of the most comprehensive look yet at they can watch it three months later, or a year later, and not Almost half said they would pay $2 per movie, followed by
think that people’s opinions are still the same? Why or
PART III
➥ provisions permitting the copying of music from format to International treaties on copyright Case law on digital copyright Despite the outcome of the case, new file-sharing networks
format or device to device for personal use, known as space- quickly arose, with one called Kazaa emerging as dominant.
Another important part of Australian copyright law comes from The difficulty in applying digital copyright law and the scale of
Law in practice
This is particularly relevant to digital copyright, where works are important cases in the United States and in Australia. They have
Case Space
Networks. The record companies claimed that the Kazaa Kazaa system, it wanted to maximise file-sharing using its
software, by allowing users to download music for free over software to increase its advertising revenue.
the internet, encouraged copyright infringement on an Justice Wilcox acknowledged that Sharman ‘probably cannot
unprecedented scale. totally prevent copyright infringement by users’, and as a result
The Federal Court found that most of Kazaa’s music files did not order Kazaa to be shut down. Concerned to ensure
were ‘shared without the approval of the relevant copyright that the software should continue to be available for people
Legal Links
PART II
convention due to sensitivity about sovereignty and authorising ➥ establishment of an effective method of resolving trademark
third parties to do cross-border searches. Also, there are civil disputes
8.7 Conclusion
but controversial role. The characteristics of cyberspace material on the internet can conflict with the protection
minded nations to fight cybercrime.
include global coverage, easy anonymity for users, and the of individual rights to free expression. Combating serious
However, the Convention on Cybercrime (Draft 25), along
facilitation of creative activity. criminal activity that makes use of the internet faces similar
Chapter summary
However, the US government has had responsibility for its oversight,
free speech. b a software program unique to the individual, which is
under a memorandum of understanding between ICANN and the
c Online communication is more like a conference call than a stored online somewhere in cyberspace.
US Department of Commerce, from 1998 to 2009. Representatives
private conversation. c a type of internet scam.
of other countries and other observers have questioned why the US
d All of the above d information placed on the internet that is no longer wanted
should have primary authority, and argued that it should be more
3 The international organisation concerned with copyright law is: but that cannot be easily removed.
independent and therefore more international.
xv
Syllabus outcomes, objectives, performance bands and language and consistent meaning in the Higher School
examination questions have key words that state what Certificate documents. Using this glossary will help students
students are expected to be able to do. A glossary of key and teachers understand what is expected in responses to
words has been developed to help provide a common examinations and assessment tasks.
Account account for: state reasons for, report on; give an Distinguish recognise or note/indicate as being distinct or
account of: narrate a series of events or transactions different from; note differences between
Analyse identify components and the relationship between Evaluate make a judgement based on criteria; determine the
them; draw out and relate implications value of
Appreciate make a judgement about the value of Explain relate cause and effect; make the relationships between
things evident; provide why and/or how
Assess make a judgement of value, quality, outcomes, results
or size Extract choose relevant and/or appropriate details
Calculate ascertain/determine from given facts, figures or Extrapolate infer from what is known
information
Identify recognise and name
Clarify make clear or plain
Interpret draw meaning from
Classify arrange or include in classes/categories
Investigate plan, inquire into and draw conclusions about
Compare show how things are similar or different
Justify support an argument or conclusion
Construct make; build; put together items or arguments
Outline sketch in general terms; indicate the main features
Contrast show how things are different or opposite
Predict suggest what may happen based on available information
Critically (analyse/evaluate) add a degree or level of accuracy
Propose put forward (for example, a point of view, idea,
depth, knowledge and understanding, logic, questioning,
argument, suggestion) for consideration or action
reflection and quality
Recall present remembered ideas, facts or experiences
Deduce draw conclusions
Recommend provide reasons in favour
Define state meaning and identify essential qualities
Recount retell a series of events
Demonstrate show by example
Summarise express the relevant details concisely
Describe provide characteristics and features
Synthesise putting together various elements to make a whole
Discuss identify issues and provide points for and/or against
The author and publisher wish to thank the following sources for permission to Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, 2.5 Generic, 2.0 Generic
reproduce material: and 1.0 Generic license, p.92-93; State Library QLD, p.94; The First Fleet in
Sydney Cove, January 27, 1788/John Allcot, 1937/an7891482, National Library
Images: ©Shutterstock/corgarashu, p.2-3/ximmytws, p.5-4/lightpoet, p.6(bl)/ of Australia, p.96(t); National Archives of Australia, 59228a, p.96(b), A8598,
tommaso79, p.6(rc)/fotografos, p.6(tr)/fotografos, p.6(tr)/Tupungato, p.6(br)/ AK6/5/80/11, p.99; ©Newspix/News Ltd, p.100, 246, 250,318(br) /James Knowler,
Suzanne Tucker, p.6(bc)/Monkey Business Images, p.7,324(br)/max blain, p.9/ / p.111/ Lindsay Moller, p.112/Braden Fastier, p.150/Anthony Reginato, p.172(t)/
Ruben Pinto, p.12(br)/Radu Razvan, p.12(bl)/Cyril Hou, p.14(br)/Neale Cousland, Lyndon Mechielsen, p.229(tl)/Kym Smith, p.237/Jodie Richter, p.264(t)-267(b)/
p.18-19/David H. Seymour, p.21/Phillip Minnis, p.27/Andrija Kovac, p.43/photogl, Craig Borrow, p. 281/Kim Smith, p.288-289/316(br)/Renee Nowytarger, p.293;
p.58-59/Feng Yu, p.63,299(br)/R, Gino Santa Maria, p.63(b)/holbox, p.69/S. On Country:Yorta Yorta Elder Professor Henry Atkinson, from the series Home/
Borisov, p.72(bl)/Circumnavigation,p.72(br)/ wong yu liang,p.74-75/Raedwald, On Country (2011), Sarah Rhodes, p.103; ©Action Photographics/NRL, p.106(br);
p.79/Ifong, p.82/Bork, p.83(b)/Brian A Jackson, p.84/ Pot of Grass Productions, ©NSW Rape Crisis Centre, p.115,117; ©Manly Council, NSW, p.119; Creative
p.89/ Jeff Lim C W, p.111/ Warren Goldswain, p.114/kurhan, p.116/Luís Brás, Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license/ Creative Commons
p.124-125/hjnisch, p.126-127/Claudio Rossol, p.130/Scott Rothstein, p.131/MS Attribution-Share Alike 2.5 Generic, 2.0 Generic and 1.0 Generic license, p.133;
Photographics, p.134(br)/Pixel 4 Images, p.137/Ryan Rodrick Beiler, p.142,143/ Thomas Schoch/Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.5 Generic license,
Pedro Miguel Sousa, p.147/ Kratka Photography, p.151/Pixel Memoirs, p.155/ p.135; Schutz/Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license/
calvindexter, p.158/Sergey Nivens, p.160-161/p.160/Aleksandar Todorovic, p.162/ Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.5 Generic, 2.0 Generic and 1.0
Sheff, p.163(br)/Jirsak, p.164,172 (b),297(bl)/Vlad Mereuta, p.165 /Pablo Eder, Generic license, p.152(tl); ©ACTU, p.153, 214; ©Twitter.”Twitter marks are a
p.166(bl)/Shevchuk Boris, p.166(br)/Songquan Deng, p.168(br)/Tomislav Pinter, trademark of Twitter, Inc.”, p.168(br); John Erling Blad/ Creative Commons
p.170(tr) /eelnosiva, p.170(br)/Ye Liew, p.171/cybrain, p.178/Distinctive Images, Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license, p.174; lkiwaner /Creative Commons
p.184-185/YanLev,p.186/Thomas M Perkins, p.188/Lisa S, p.191/Jon Le-Bon, Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license, p.199;ABS/ABS Schools, Australia,
p.292/mangostock, p.195/Sascha Burkard, p.196/Oleg Znamenskiy, p.202- 2010 (cat. no. 4221.0) www.abs.gov.au, p.206/Labour Force, Australia (cat. no.
203,225/Everett Collection, p.204/Dimitry Kalinovsky, p.206/Spirit of America, 6202.0), p.209; Tirin/Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported
p.207/Zurijeta, p.210/ Andresr, p.213/Derekfsmith, p.242-243/Maxim Petrichuk, license under the GNU Free Documentation License, p.214(br); National
p.249/Katarzyna Mazurowska, p.258-259/Vydrin, p.264/ pcruciatti, p.272/ Security Department /Australian Government/Creative Commons Attribution
BartlomiejMagierowski, p.276-277/Mirvav, p.278(tr)/DDCoral, p.278(br)/Guy J 3.0 Australia, p.234; ©UN Photo Library/ Devra Berkowitz, p.217; ©Alamy/
Sagi, p.285/Sari Oneal, p.285/Kheng Guan Toh, p.296-297/Stephen VanHorn, CuboImages srl, p.226, 227/Roger Cracknell07/classic, p.261(br)/Jakob Kamender,
p.298/NSW Police/AAP, p.300/ Pavel Ignatov, p.301/khz, p.302(bl)/alexskopje, p.273; Arnaud Gaillard/Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 1.0 Generic
p.304(br) /Vladyslav Danilin, p.306(tl)/Junede, p.308/niderlander,p.314-315/ license, p.235(tl); Artist Unknown/ GNU Free Documentation License/Creative
Norman Pogson, p.317(t)/Subbotina Anna, p.317(b)/ Mircea Bexergheanu, p.321/ Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.5 Generic license, p.280(tl), 280(bl); David
James A.Harris, p.323(tl)/ lrlucik, p.324(br)/nialat, p.327/Oleg Golovnev, p.223/ Shankbone/ Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license/
Slobodan Djajic, p.213/Brandon Bourdages, p.piii/Dusan Po, p.156/mypokik, Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Generic license, p.282; ©Australian Defence
p.219/luchschen, p.326(br); ©Corbis/Andrew Watson/JAI/Corbis, p.11/Peter Force/ Australian Government, p.323(tr); ©F.R.E.E. Australia Party, p.292; ©AAP/
Foley/epa, p.72(tl)/Sheldon Levis 1/Deomitx, p.105/Bettman, p.187/Heritage AP Photo/Rick Rycroft, p.182-183/ Radar Bali, p.230/Malaysia Police Dept,
Images, p.205/Penny Tweedie, p.208/epa, p.229(bl)/Neville Elder, p.229(br)/ p.231(r ) /AP Photo/Achmad Ibrahim, p.229(t)/Anwar Mustafa/AFP, p.229(r)/Dita
Peter Foley/epa, p.236/ Mark M. Lawrence, p.260(tr) /Patrick Robert, p.261(bl)/ Alangkara/AP, p.233(tl)(tc)(tr)/Dave Hunt, p.269/Pool/Steven Siewert, p.278/
Jacques Langevin/Sygma, p.279; Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike Dan Himbrechts, p.304(tl); ©David Gray/ Reuters/Picture Media/ RTXHDPH,
2.0 Generic license/ ©Infrogmation, p.14(t)/laff y4k, p.14(bl)/Steve Cadmanp.51/ p.253; ©IP Awareness Foundation, p.306(tr); ©North Wind Pictures, p.318(tl);
Kingbob86 (Timothy), p.255/Espen Moe, p.273/Joi Ito, p.163(tl), p.302(br)/Artist ©Bloomberg via Getty Images, p.318(bl); ©Highway Patrol Images/Creative
Unknown, p.318/ Ruth Ellison, p.235(bl)/ jasonesbain, p.157 /Timeshift9, p.128/ Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license, p.320.
Chris Johnson, p.140/ Patrick Gruban, p.53/1Flatworld (Richard Johnstone,
p.78/Paul, p.106(bl); Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported Text: ‘Cigarette Beach Ban’ Reproduced by permission of the Australian
license, p.136 /Martyman, p.97/Fanny Schertzer, p.244/ ©JJ Harrison, p.28/ Broadcasting Corporation and ABC Online. NSW Political Reporter Liz Foschia/28
Thomas Schoch, p.45/Hanhil from the Nederlandstalige Wikipedia, p.50/ Feb 2012, p.13; ‘Google hit with $200,000 damages bill over Mokbel shots’,
Enoch,p.60/ Dedda71, p.78/Bidgee, p.41,106(bc),145(b)/Samh_7, p.152(bl)/Yann Oakes, ©SMH, 12 Nov 2012, p.138; ‘Saggy pants crackdown pays off ’, ©SMH, 29
Forget, p.168(l); ©Wikimedia Commons, p.14(tr), 22,23,33,41,134(tl),145(t),146,1 Sep 2011, p.134; ‘Chainsaw and samurai sword used in neighbours’ clash over
93,233(tr),179,237,307; ©Masgatokaca, p.233(br); ©Author TwoWings/Creative loud music, Nick Ralston, ©SMH, 2 May 2012, p.148; ‘NSW Ombudsman calls for
Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.5 Generic license, p.14(br); ©John Oxley Taser overhaul’ ©AAP/SMH, 24 Oct 2012, p.157; ‘Police union warns of lack of
Library, State Library of Queensland 1234584, p.32; ©Ross Scott, Tasmanian bikie laws’, Dan Oaks, ©SMH, 20 July 2012, p.290; ‘High court decision shows
Wilderness Society, p.36; ©John D Chesworth, p.34; ©FACATSI/Gordon Bryant government needs to act to keep pace with online environment’, ©AFACT, 20
Papers, NLA, MS 8256/11, p.37; David R Horton, creator, ©Aboriginal Studies April 2012, p.309; ‘Most pirates say they’d pay for legal downloads’, Andrew
Press, AIATSIS and Auslig/Sinclair, Knight, Merz,1996, p.47(t); William Blandowski, Ramadge ©news.com.au, 06 May 2010, p.310; ‘Airline staff test positive to
Gustav Mützel/Wikimedia Commons, p.47(b); ©Fairfax/ Greg White/SMH, alcohol, drug tests’, Miles Kemp©The Advertiser/news.com.au,17 May 2012,
p.48/The Age Archives, p.98/Tamara Dean, p.220/Bruce Miller, p.284/Julian p.322; ‘National Drug Strategy Household Survey Report’ ©Australian Institute
Kingma, p.245/Andrew Meares, p.247; Marcello Casal JR/Abr/Creative Commons of Health & Welfare, 27 July 2011, p.320; ‘School drug tests a waste of money’,
Attribution 3.0 Brazil license, p.52; “Trademark of Stichting Greenpeace Council”, Reproduced by permission of the Australian Broadcasting Corporation and
p.54; Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900, National Archives of ABC Online. (c) 2008 ABC. All rights reserved. Michael Turtle, Wed 26 Mar 2008,
Australia, Used Under the Creative Commons Copyright License, p.62; urban p.324; Beth Gaze, ‘Twenty Years of the Sex Discrimination Act: Assessing its
cow/vetta collection/istock, p.64; ©Getty Images/Michael Kelley, p.66/ Matt achievements’, The Alternative Law Journal 30(1), February 2005, p.220; ‘Payouts
King, p.107/AFP, p.260(bl), 267(b)/Adrian Dennis, p.261(t)/Peter Parks, AFP, in sexual harassment settlements hardly worth the trouble’ By Adele Horen
p.324; ©Philip Hediger/Flickr, p.67; David Loades, Elizabeth I:The Golden Reign ©Sydney Morning Herald, 16 April 2012, p.219.
of Gloriana, London: National Archives, 2003, ISBN 1903365430, p.72(bc); Jim.
henderson/ Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication, Every effort has been made to trace and acknowledge copyright. The publisher
p.76; Salim Fadhley Free Art License/Copyleft License, p.83(t); ©Courtesy Nine apologises for any accidental infringement and welcomes information that
Network Australia/ACA, p.87; ©ActionAid Australia, p.87; ©Peripitus/Creative would redress this situation.
x vii
ISBN 9781107650787 © Paul Milgate et al 2013 Cambridge University Press
Photocopying is restricted under law and this material must not be transferred to another party.
Digital resources and support material for schools.
THIS TEXTBOOK
IS SUPPORTED BY
ONLINE RESOURCES
Additional resources are available for users
of this textbook online at Cambridge GO.
www.cambridge.edu.au/GO
Terms of Use:
PDF Textbook: The downloaded PDF Textbook is expressly available for personal use
only. You are entitled to download and store this PDF Textbook on your local device.
It may not be transferred to another party as an electronic or print version. Schools
are entitled to load the PDF Textbook onto their school network for use only by the
same number of users for which they have purchased printed or digital textbooks.
Principal focus
Through examining law-making processes and institutions, students will gain an understanding of the
nature and functions of the legal system.
➔ identify and apply legal concepts and terminology ➔ discuss the nature of justice in terms of equality, fairness
➔ identify the changing nature of law and access
➔ describe the interrelationship between customs, rules ➔ discuss the concept of procedural fairness and the rule of law
and laws ➔ discuss the concepts of anarchy and tyranny
➔ explain the relationship between the legal system ➔ communicate legal information by using well-structured
and society responses.
Key terms/vocabulary
access equality legal system rules
Odd law
Did you know that in NSW it is illegal to prevent a minister of religion from giving a service?
Whosoever by threats or force prevents, or endeavours to prevent, any members of the clergy, or other person duly authorised in that
behalf, from officiating in a place of divine worship, or from the performance of his or her duty in the lawful burial of the dead in a
burial place, or strikes or offers any violence to, any member of the clergy, or minister engaged in, or to the knowledge of the offender
about to engage in, any of the duties aforesaid, or going to perform the same, shall be liable to imprisonment for two years.
In general terms, the law can be defined as a set of enforceable 2 What other areas of law can you think of? List at
rules of conduct which set down guidelines for relationships least five.
PART I
Rules
Figure 1.2 There may not be a law about wearing school uniform, but there is often a rule.
Complete the lists below by adding three additional 1 Laws are binding on the whole community. This means that they
HOUSEHOLD RULES 2 Laws can be enforced. This means that penalties apply if a law
1 Always inform your parents when you are going out. is broken.
3 Laws are officially recognised. This means that governments and
2
courts recognise laws and enforce them.
3
4 Laws are accessible (or discoverable). This means that people
4
can find out which law applies to a particular situation.
SCHOOL RULES 5 Laws relate to public interest. This means that laws exist for
1 Students must always wear correct school uniform on
things that concern the whole of society, and that interest
school grounds.
is considered to outweigh the costs or drawbacks of the
2 government’s involvement in enforcing them.
3 6 Laws reflect rights and duties. This means that everyone in
4 society has responsibilities to others, such as the duty to drive
SOCIAL ETIQUETTE safely, and that everyone has the right to be treated in the same
1 Always cover your mouth and nose when sneezing way by others.
in public. In Australia today, the laws are mainly decided by elected
2 government officials at local, state or federal government levels.
3 Judges also have the power to make laws in certain cases when
they set a precedent. This will be discussed in greater detail in the
4
following chapters.
It is expected by society that the law will look after all members
Law of the group, and therefore that any laws made will be fair, just
and equitable. It is also expected that they will reflect traditional
The law, as we know it, is made up of the formal rules of society. and current ethics and values. Although this represents the ideal
These ‘legal rules’ have been agreed upon by the majority of those situation, what is actually attainable may be another matter.
in the group, and govern their behaviour and activities.
ethics (1) rules or standards governing the conduct of a person or
Laws are different from rules. For example, at the shopping the members of a profession; (2) a major branch of philosophy, which
centre, a sign on the escalator requests that you stand to the left investigates the nature of values and of right and wrong conduct
and do not take strollers on it. These rules exist for the safety and
comfort of shoppers. However, they are just rules, and that is why Table 1.1 Differences between laws and rules
you will still see people standing on the right and taking their prams
Laws Rules
on the escalator. There are also signs telling you that you can’t
➥ to be obeyed by all ➥ to be obeyed by specific
smoke in shopping centres. This is a law, and if someone did ‘light
citizens of a society individuals or groups
up’ they would be asked to leave the shopping centre by security
➥ made by a law-making ➥ made by individuals
or the police, and they might incur a fine. The consequences of
body or groups
breaking rules are comparatively minor, however inconsiderate it
may be to break them. ➥ enforced through the ➥ enforced by leaders
courts of a group
Laws allow and prohibit a whole variety of activities, from where
rubbish should be placed to how we should treat fellow human ➥ a breach results in a ➥ consequences of a breach
prescribed sanction at the discretion of the
beings. Failure to follow them incurs penalties ranging from a fine
imposed by the courts leader of a group
to imprisonment.
PART I
Relationship between customs,
rules and laws
We all have values by which we try to live. Living according to our
As people have joined together in communities, a relationship has ethics means that we do things that we consider to be morally right.
developed between rules, laws and customs: Law-makers try to incorporate these values and ethics into laws.
1.5 The nature of justice doli incapax a Latin term meaning ‘incapable of wrong’; the presumption
that a child under 10 years of age cannot be held legally responsible for
his or her actions and cannot be guilty of a criminal or civil offence
The system of courts (and those who work within the courts, such
as judges and legal practitioners), prosecutors and police in a
country is often called the legal system. It is the task of the legal Fairness
system to ensure that all citizens have equal access to the law and
that the law provides equality, fairness and justice to all members Fairness and justice are usually associated with each other.
of society. Equality, fairness and justice are central concepts The difference is that the term ‘fairness’ applies to everyday life,
which allow us to distinguish good law from bad law. However, whereas ‘justice’ has more legal connotations. People may have
if all citizens do not have full and equal access to the legal system, different opinions about what is fair.
equality, fairness and justice are just empty concepts. It is only by For example, suppose one team wins a sport competition
combining all of these principles that a legal system will be seen because all of its players, randomly selected, happen to be taller
to be providing justifiable and appropriate outcomes. than those on the other team. If the rules of the competition do not
specify that both teams must have players of the same size, it may
legal system the system of courts, prosecutors and police within a country seem unfair to the losing team, but there is no ‘fact of the matter’. If
Ann places a bet on the team she knows has the taller players, and
none of the other people who placed bets knows anything about
equality the state or quality of being equal; that is, of having the same the teams or how tall the players are, Ann’s winning the bet may
rights or status
also be regarded as unfair – as a result of her having knowledge the
others lacked.
In other words, even if it is sometimes possible for an opinion
fairness freedom from bias, dishonesty, or injustice; a concept commonly
about what is fair to be justified or mistaken, there is no single social
related to everyday activities
mechanism for deciding what is fair or ensuring fairness.
PART I
When rules are made, it is expected that they will be fair to those
covered by them. In the same way, when a rule is translated into law,
it is expected that it will be fair to all members of society. Justice and the principles of
is more specific than fairness, as the term is applied to situations natural justice
covered by the law, which tries to ensure that everyone has the
Procedural fairness refers to the idea that there must be fairness in
same opportunities.
because they create order. Laws help each person to feel a sense
of security – the law is clear about what is expected of them as
citizens and what they can expect from others. As the law is based
on customs, it also helps to reinforce the values of most members of
society. In principle, the law embodies the concept that what each
individual believes is important has the same importance to the
larger group.
Figure 1.5 People sometimes disobey laws if they do not consider the
penalty to be sufficiently harsh.
Media Clip
Smoking to be banned in NSW public spaces
Liz Foschia
ABC Online, 28 February 2012
The New South Wales Government is to stub out smoking in ‘We want to honour the commitment we made to clubs
most of the state’s public places, from parks to bus stops. through our memorandum of understanding. This is a
Health Minister Jillian Skinner says legislation will be Government that keeps its promises.’
introduced to the Parliament in coming months to prohibit The Government says smoking-related illnesses account for
smoking in sports grounds, swimming pools, entrances to more than 5,000 deaths in NSW each year, while 44,000 are
buildings and public transport stops. admitted to hospital.
‘A series of places where children and families congregate The NSW Cancer Council has applauded the announcement.
more frequently,’ Ms Skinner said. Council chief executive Andrew Penman says the legislation
Smoking will also be banned in commercial outdoor dining will give people more choice in whether they are exposed to
areas but not until 2015. smoke.
Ms Skinner has defended the delay on that aspect of the ban, ‘The important principle is that the measures are aimed at
saying it honours a Coalition election commitment to the clubs protecting people from being exposed in places where they
industry. are involuntarily present,’ Dr Penman said.
‘Nobody is calling the tune on this except the public, who ‘They have to be at a taxi rank, they have to be at a rail
asked for this legislation and it will be happening,’ she said. station. They really haven’t got the option to move away.’
‘We had 16 years of Labor. That wasn’t done then. It’s now not He is pragmatic about the outside dining areas delay.
even a year within the O’Farrell Government and, here we are, ‘The important thing is to move forwards. What we do have
we’ve moved already. is a firm cut off in 2015,’ he said.
Figure 1.6 After Hurricane Katrina in the United States in 2005, parts of
New Orleans slipped into a brief state of anarchy. Figure 1.7 The ‘Circle-a’ is the most widely recognised symbol for anarchy.
Research 1.1
Prepare a report on anarchy and modern-day anarchist
organisations. In your report include the following:
➥ a definition
➥ a history
➥ information on two anarchist organisations and
their beliefs
➥ modern-day anarchists and their activities.
To help with your research, go to www.cambridge.edu.au/
prelegal3weblinks for links to a sample of different anarchist
groups. Alternatively, you may choose your own group to
research.
These groups often protest at:
➥ G8 summits
➥ European Union meetings
➥ World Trade Organization meetings. Figure 1.9 Zimbabwean tyrant Robert Mugabe and an example of a
protest against him.
➔ People follow the law because it provides them with c wearing black clothes to break the rules
➔ identify and apply legal concepts and terminology ➔ describe the role of the law in conflict resolution and
➔ describe the key features and operation of the Australian its ability to respond to and initiate change
and international legal systems ➔ locate, select and organise legal information from a
➔ discuss the effectiveness of the legal system in dealing variety of sources
with relevant issues ➔ communicate legal information by using well-structured
➔ explain the relationship between the legal system responses.
and society
Key terms/vocabulary
adversarial system delegated legislation legislative powers residual powers
Significant cases
Gutnick v Dow Jones & Co. Inc. [2001] VSC 305 R v Brislan; Ex parte Williams [1935] HCA 78
South Australia v Commonwealth [1942] HCA 14 Roper v Simmons, 543 US 551 (2005)
Odd law
Defendants in a criminal case can apply for a retrial when it is found that there is an error in the original case. Cesan v The Queen;
Mas Rivadavia v the Queen [2008] HCA 52, a case heard in the High Court, saw the court order a retrial for two men suspected of drug
smuggling because the judge presiding over the original trial had been ‘asleep during significant parts of the trial’. In addition to simply
being asleep for key parts of the trial, such as the presentation of evidence, the judge’s snoring and heavy breathing distracted the jury.
adversarial system a system of resolving legal conflicts, used in common Development of the common law
law countries such as England and Australia, which relies on the skill of
representatives for each side (e.g. defence and prosecution lawyers) who
present their cases to an impartial decision-maker The British legal system itself developed from a number of sources.
In Anglo-Saxon England, for example, questions about rights and
obligations were decided on the basis of local custom, and disputes
The inquisitorial system were resolved by local courts. After the Normans invaded England
in the 11th century, they began a system of travelling judges who
In an inquisitorial system, the court is actively involved in applied a common set of laws to all areas of England. Petitions from
determining the way in which the competing claims are presented. people who felt that the local courts had been unjust were dealt
It is different from the adversarial system, where the role of the with on the premise that similar cases should be treated in a similar
court is to act as an impartial referee. way. The decisions made by the judges provided the precedents
The inquisitorial system derives from the Roman and Napoleonic for later cases, and the laws they applied became the basis of the
codes. It is found in Europe, as well as Japan and some other countries. British legal system.
This system was the one brought over to Australia with the wound healed within a prescribed period, or if the defendant sank,
First Fleet, but gradually Australia has developed its own legal he or she was considered innocent and set free; if not, execution
system based on its statute law and common law. Many British usually followed.
legal principles have been retained in the Australian system. These Trial by ordeal continued after the Norman conquest, though
include the principles of natural justice. there were new requirements imposed by the church, for example
From about the 6th to the 11th century, the law was enforced that no one could be made to undergo an ordeal without the
by local administrative bodies. The king’s appointees, the church, bishop’s permission. It was eventually condemned by the church in
and local landlords all had a role in court resolution of legal 1215 and abolished by royal decree in 1219.
matters. Crimes were treated as wrongs for which the offender had In order to consolidate his hold on the country, William the
to compensate the victim. If the court accepted a case, both the Conqueror sent judges (or justices) around the country with three
person against whom the illegal act was allegedly committed (the main tasks to carry out:
plaintiff) and the person who was said to have committed it (the 1 Administer a common set of laws throughout the country.
defendant) had to swear an oath. The defendant might have the 2 Report on any threats to the throne.
help of ‘oath-helpers’ – people willing to swear to his innocence. 3 Assess the wealth of the country so that taxes could be
If the court found the defendant’s oath believable, he or she could levied.
simply walk away. If, however, the plaintiff could bring witnesses When a later ruler, Henry II, came to the throne in 1154, there was
who would swear that the defendant had committed the act, the a well-established practice of sending royal justices throughout
defendant might be required to participate in a ‘trial by ordeal’. the countryside to listen to disputes, work out solutions and
Before the ordeal, the defendant had to fast for three days and apply punishments, and ensure that common rulings were made
attend a special Mass. He was then given a painful task to complete overall. These judges also had authority to make decisions when
or to bear, such as carrying a red-hot iron bar a certain distance in they heard new cases. In this way, a set of uniform laws developed
his bare hands, retrieving a stone from a cauldron of boiling water, throughout England. Thus, common law as we know it today
putting his hand into a flame, or being thrown into a river or pond. has evolved from judicial decisions that were based in tradition,
If the defendant completed the task without injury or death, if the custom and precedent.
equity the body of law that supplements the common law and corrects
injustices by judging each case on its merits and applying principles
of fairness
Figure 2.2 An example of a water ordeal: the guilty would float, the
The doctrine of precedent
innocent would sink.
As stated above, the common law, or case law, is the law developed
by judges when deciding cases. Not only are there rules about the
Development of equity presentation of evidence and the running of the case, but judges
must resolve disputes on the basis of decisions made in similar
The procedure for bringing a case before the court was rigidly
cases. A judgement that is followed is called a precedent, and
formal. In Anglo-Saxon times, if a party failed to follow the
it provides the authority for the legal principle contained in the
prescribed steps, he could lose his case. Even later, the common
decision. The doctrine of precedent is also known as stare decisis
law would hold that a person was bound by a contract, even if he
– Latin for ‘the decision stands’.
had made a mistake or been tricked into signing it. By the 15th
The purpose of precedent is to ensure that people are treated
century, people were bringing petitions to the king claiming that
fairly, and that the law develops in a consistent and coherent
the common law courts had made unjust decisions. It became the
fashion. It means that old cases retain authority and their decisions
job of the Chancellor to deal with these petitions.
can be used as the basis for decisions in modern court cases. Thus
For many years, the Chancellor was a priest, as well as a judge.
the doctrine of precedent works to limit a judge’s ability to be
Chancellors did not base their judgements on precedent and form;
creative when it comes to making a decision.
instead, they were influenced by Christian principles. This body of
law, which developed to deal with the injustices that had crept into
precedent a judgement that is stare decisis a Latin term
the common law and was set up to hear these petitions, became authority for a legal principle, and meaning ‘the decision stands’; the
known as equity. that serves to provide guidance doctrine that a decision must be
for deciding cases that have followed by all lower courts
As a court of equity, the Court of Chancery looked at the
similar facts
features of each case to decide what was fair or just in the particular
Persuasive precedent
2.3 Court hierarchy: The Australian Capital Territory does not have the intermediate
level, but is otherwise similar. Each court has its own jurisdiction, or
Jurisdiction of state and area over which it has authority. Minor matters are dealt with lower
federal courts in the court hierarchy, and the higher courts are reserved for more
serious matters and appeals from the lower courts.
Australia has two overlapping jurisdictions of law: state and In criminal cases, minor offences such as loitering and
federal. As a result, there are separate state and federal obstructing traffic are called summary offences – these are dealt
jurisdictions, each of which has its own court structure. with in the lower courts. More serious criminal offences, such as
All courts have the power to hear a case for the first time. Some assault and murder, are called indictable offences – these are
courts can also hear appeals from lower courts. This means they dealt with in the higher courts.
Most criminal matters are heard in the Local or Magistrate’s Coroner’s Court
Court, as only very serious crimes are referred to the District or
In New South Wales and in the Australian Capital Territory, the role
Supreme Courts. In the case of indictable offences, the magistrate
of the Coroner’s Court is to ensure that unexplained or suspicious
will listen to an outline of the evidence to determine whether
deaths (or suspected deaths), fires and explosions are properly
the prosecution has a strong enough case to be able to try the
investigated. If necessary, coronial inquests are carried out
defendant in the District Court or Supreme Court. This preliminary
and cases are handed to a higher court for trial.
hearing is called a committal hearing.
The Local Court in New South Wales has jurisdiction to deal with Children’s Court
the following areas:
In New South Wales and in the Australian Capital Territory, the
➥ minor criminal and summary offences
Children’s Court deals with civil matters related to the care and
➥ civil matters with a monetary value of up to $100 000
protection of children and young people. It also deals with
➥ committal hearings
criminal cases involving persons under the age of 18 at the
➥ a limited range of family law matters, such as property
time of the offence, or (in New South Wales) under the age of 21
settlements and residence orders for children. In this area,
when charged with a crime they committed while under the age
the Local Court has federal jurisdiction and in these matters is
of 18.
essentially part of the Federal Court hierarchy.
The Magistrates’ Court of the Australian Capital Territory has Land and Environment Court
similar jurisdiction, although it can hear and decide civil matters
The Land and Environment Court is a specialist court responsible
with a maximum monetary value of $250 000.
for interpreting and enforcing environmental law in the state
The District Court of New South Wales deals with more serious professional negligence, possession of land, and defamation. Most
criminal matters. These include every thing from charges of larceny civil matters are dealt with by a judge alone, but a jury is used in
to more serious charges such as manslaughter, sexual assault and some limited circumstances.
large-scale drug importation. The only charges with which the The Supreme Court also hears appeals. The Court of Appeal is the
District Court cannot deal are murder, treason and piracy, which highest court in each state and territory, for both civil and criminal
must be dealt with by the Supreme Court. matters. It also makes decisions about procedural fairness in lower
A judge, and sometimes a jury, will hear cases tried in a courts. Three judges hear most appeals, but some are heard by two,
District Court. and, in special cases, they may be heard by more than three. If the
The District Court deals with criminal offences such as: judges cannot agree, the majority view prevails. To appeal to the
➥ manslaughter, malicious wounding, and dangerous driving High Court from the Court of Appeal, special permission must be
➥ sexual assaults
corporations law legislation that regulates corporations and the
➥ offences relating to property, including robbery, breaking and securities and futures industry in Australia; it is administered by the
entering, larceny and embezzlement Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC)
5 Indicate the types of cases that are dealt with in the parliaments with respect to making law.
District Court of New South Wales. Who decides these
cases? The role and structure of parliament
6 Describe the role of the Supreme Court.
A parliament is a body of elected representatives. It debates
7 Explain the importance of the High Court.
proposed legislation, passes or rejects it, and amends legislation.
8 In which court would the following matters most likely
Apart from Queensland and the territories, all state parliaments
be heard?
and the Federal Parliament are bicameral. This means that they
a murder trial
have two houses, an upper house and a lower house. The Australian
b an appeal from the NSW Supreme Court Capital Territory’s parliament is unicameral: it only has a lower
c a hearing for the offence of using offensive house, called the Legislative Assembly. In New South Wales, the
language in public lower house is known as the Legislative Assembly and the upper
d an investigation into a suspicious death house is called the Legislative Council.
e an armed robbery trial In Federal Parliament, the two houses are the Senate (the
f the preliminary hearing for a kidnapping case upper house) and the House of Representatives (the lower house).
The government is formed by the political party that wins the majority
g a civil dispute between business partners involving
$100 million of seats in the lower house. Sometimes parties will unite to form a
government (such as the Liberal–National Coalition). The prime
h a case dealing with an aspect of the Australian
minister is the leader of the government. The political party or parties
Constitution
who have the remaining seats in the lower house form the opposition.
Executive
members of
parliament
Non-government
members of
parliament
For information on the Commonwealth Parliament go to few years, they are well aware of the consequences of passing
www.cambridge.edu.au/prelegal3weblinks for a link to the unpopular legislation. This means that proposed legislation often
Parliament of Australia website. undergoes much discussion in parliament and may be redrafted
many times.
bodies. It involves ‘less important’ laws that parliament does not 4 Explain why Australian law is based on common law
have time to draft, consider and pass, and so delegates (passes principles.
on) the responsibility to ‘subordinate’ bodies, such as government 5 Identify the differences between court-made law and
departments or local councils. The act that authorises a body to statute law.
make delegated legislation is called an ‘enabling Act’. 6 How is the principle of precedent used in court
Types of delegated legislation include: decisions?
9 regulations – laws made by the Governor-General, state 7 Evaluate the importance of the Gutnick v Dow Jones &
Governors or members of the Executive Council Co. Inc. case.
10 ordinances – laws made for Australian territories (e.g. 8 Devise a way to explain to the public how an act of
Norfolk Island and the Australian Antarctic Territory) parliament is made. You may wish to use a series of
11 rules – legislation made for government departments, cartoons or a storyboard.
usually by the department involved 9 Define delegated legislation. Demonstrate your
12 by-laws – laws made by local councils which are restricted knowledge with appropriate examples.
to the area governed by that council.
Influences on governments to make laws come from many and varied sources.
These include:
• community interest/lobby groups
Need for new law • electoral mandate
is identified
The first ‘formal’ reading of the bill takes place: the Clerk of the Parliament reads out the
First reading
title of the bill. Each Member receives a copy of the proposed Act.
The minister then speaks about the proposed Act, elaborating on its general aims.
Second reading Debate over the bill takes place. This stage is completed by the Clerk reading the title
of the bill for the second time.
The bill is examined and debated in detail and changes (known as amendments) are
Committee stage
made if necessary.
During the third reading a vote is taken on the bill. If the bill passes, it moves to the
Third reading
upper house.
In the upper house, the process is repeated. If the bill does not pass in the upper house
Upper House
is may be returned to the lower house for amendments or may be rejected..
If the bill is passed in the upper house, it is presented to the Governor (in the case of
NSW legislation) or Governor-General (in the case of federal legislation) for formal
Royal assent
approval. The bill now becomes an Act of Parliament and is law as of the date specified
in the Act.
Transport: a national rail network would overcome problems Fear: smaller states believed that the more populous and ‘richer’
Defence: as the colonies were far from Britain and thus from Apathy: many people felt that federation was irrelevant to
Britain’s ability to assist in the event of attack, a unified military their daily lives; this was compounded by the severe economic
force would reduce vulnerability depression of the 1890s
Nationalism: there was a desire to foster a unique Australian Expense: federation would be expensive to achieve and a national
identity and culture distinct from the ‘mother country’, England government would be expensive to run
(in 1900, 96% of Australians were of British origin)
Racial ‘purity’: implementing national policies restricting Cheap labour: Queensland was determined to protect its sugar
immigration would ‘keep Australia white’ (the White industry by allowing Pacific Islanders ‘kanakas’ to work on the
Australia Policy) sugar plantations
rail gauge the distance between the inner White Australia Policy the government tariff a tax that must be paid on imports
sides of the two rails of a train line policy of allowing only Europeans and English- or exports
speaking people to immigrate to Australia
Figure 2.11 The states’ different rail gauges were a ‘legacy’ of the colonial system of Australia. The Constitution refers to this issue in ss 51(xxxii), (xiii) and
(xxxiv). Rail gauges for all states are now standardised, allowing efficient interstate rail travel.
ultra vires (Latin) beyond the power or authority legally held by a person,
institution or statute to perform an act
bipartisan having the support of the two major political parties Figure 2.13 In 1967, Australia voted ‘yes’ to allow the government to make
laws concerning Indigenous people.
Separation of powers chapters of the Constitution are set out in accordance with the
doctrine:
The separation of powers doctrine was developed by the 18th- ➥ Chapter I – The Parliament (ss 1 to 60)
century French political philosopher, Charles de Secondat ➥ Chapter II – The Executive (ss 61 to 70)
Montesquieu. He believed that the civil liberties of the public were ➥ Chapter III – The Judicature (ss 71 to 80)
at risk if the key organs of government were controlled by one In theory Australia has adopted the doctrine of the separation of
person or group. powers. However, because some members of the executive are
Montesquieu identified these key organs of government as: members of the legislature – that is, the ministers and the prime
➥ the legislature – the law-makers (in Australia this is the minister are members of both the executive and the legislature
parliament: the House of Representatives and the Senate) – the separation of powers does not exist in its pure form in
➥ the executive – the ministers and government departments Australia.
who administer the laws made by parliament (in Australia The key feature of the separation of powers in Australia is that
the Governor-General, the prime minister and Cabinet are there is a clear distinction between the judiciary and the other
members of the executive) arms of government. For a true democracy to operate and in the
➥ the judiciary – the courts which interpret and apply the law. interests of justice, it is imperative that there be no overlap between
If one person or group controls all three organs or arms of the judicial and non-judicial arms of government. Protecting the
government, then he, she or it has unfettered power and the risk independence of the judiciary is one of the cornerstones of our
of dictatorship is very real. If the three arms are independent, each democracy. This becomes evident when a court makes a decision
acts as a check on the others, ensuring that no branch abuses its that is not in accordance with government policy.
power and that civil liberties are protected.
civil liberties basic individual rights, such as freedom of speech and
Australia’s founders certainly wanted the doctrine of the
religion, which are protected by law
separation of powers to apply upon federation. The first three
Review 2.4 itself. Matters relating to the interpretation of the Constitution fall
under s 76(i), and this role of the High Court has, at times, had an
1 Distinguish between the three ‘arms’ of government. enormous influence on determining the division of power between
2 Explain how the separation of powers operates in Australia. the states and the Commonwealth.
3 Outline the significance of the separation of powers for
original jurisdiction the ability or power of a court to hear a case in the
the functioning of a democracy.
first instance
As community conditions, standards and attitudes evolve, interpretation of the Constitution involves stipulating what areas
they should be reflected in the views expressed by the judiciary. the Commonwealth can legislate on and what areas belong to
This is another way in which the law maintains its relevance and the states. In association with such decisions, the High Court
effectiveness. makes statements on how each level of government can use its
When a case concerning the interpretation of the Constitution powers and outlines any limits on such powers. For example, in
comes before the High Court, all seven judges hear and decide the Tasmanian Dam case, the High Court said in obiter dicta that
the matter. This ensures a final decision, even though decisions the Commonwealth can only use the external affairs power when
need not be unanimous. The High Court is the highest court in entering legitimate international treaties or conventions. In other
the Australian judicial system and, since 1986, there are no other words, the Commonwealth government could not enter a treaty
avenues of appeal available. The Australia Act 1986 (Cth) severed with another country simply to gain legitimacy to override a state
the judicial link with England; appeals from the Australian judicial law that it disagreed with. Initially High Court decisions favoured
system no longer go to the Privy Council in England for final the states but, over time, a broader approach to interpreting the
determination. Constitution has seen a shift in the legislative balance between
the states and the Commonwealth. The following cases are
examples of the High Court exercising its original jurisdiction to
The influence of the High Court: interpret the Constitution.
Interpreting the Constitution
South Australia v Commonwealth (‘First
While the High Court has various roles, such as determining
Uniform Tax case’) [1942] HCA 14
whether a particular body has the jurisdiction to exercise judicial
power, one of its fundamental duties is to interpret disputes Section (ii) of the Constitution clearly gives the Commonwealth the
concerning the Constitution. Invariably, the High Court’s legislative power to collect taxes. This was considered a concurrent
Appeals to the High Court from decision about whether a particular law is constitutionally valid or
not. It has almost unlimited jurisdiction to review Commonwealth
lower courts administrative decisions.
The Federal Court undertakes most judicial reviews by applying
Section 73 outlines the appellate jurisdiction of the High Court.
the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth). It is
It stipulates that the High Court has jurisdiction to ‘hear and
important to understand that this Act applies strict rules and does
determine all judgements’ from any cases emanating from:
not give the Federal Court the power to review a decision on its
➥ the High Court exercising its original jurisdiction
merits. Appeals can go to the High Court, by leave.
➥ any Federal Court exercising federal jurisdiction
A far more effective and efficient way for individuals to appeal
➥ the Supreme Court of any state.
the decision of a government official or body is through non-judicial
Section 73 also states that ‘the judgement of the High Court in all
review of administrative action in the Administrative Appeals
such cases shall be final and conclusive’. Currently, all appeal cases
Tribunal, which has jurisdiction to review the merits. Courts other
must be granted special leave before the case will be heard by the
than federal courts may also review decisions on the merits, if they
High Court. Chapter 4 of the High Court Rules 2004, which became
have statutory authority to do so.
effective on 1 January 2005, deals with the practice and procedure
Generally, judicial review involves the court with appropriate
of the High Court in its appellate jurisdiction.
jurisdiction investigating whether a government official or
Generally, appeals relate to questions of law, or a matter that
department has acted ultra vires, or whether he, she or it has
is of such significance as to warrant the attention of the High Court,
followed the rules of natural justice (procedural fairness). These
or a dispute between the opinions of various courts that requires
concepts are covered in the HSC course.
a final adjudication. The workload of the High Court has built up
over the decades and there are numerous examples of the High
merits review analysis of the facts presented in a case, and often the
Court deciding matters in its appellate jurisdiction. One of the
policy choices that led to the decision
more famous cases is Osland v R, a 1998 appeal from the Victorian
Supreme Court.
natural justice the body of principles used to ensure the fairness and
special leave where the High question of law a disputed legal justice of the decision-making procedures of courts; in Australia it
Court grants approval for the case contention that is left for the generally refers to the right to present your case, the right to freedom
to come before it in its appellate judge to decide (e.g. whether from bias by decision-makers, and the right to a decision based on
jurisdiction certain evidence is admissible) relevant evidence
Diversity of Indigenous societies Indigenous peoples and has developed over many thousands of
years. Most laws relate to marriage, child-rearing, religion, family
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander law is tribal and different and kinship. Customary laws have been passed from generation
groups have their own variations of customary law. Australia is a to generation by word of mouth and through ritual. Stories, songs
large land mass and, as a result, different languages and modes and dances are used to help people remember the laws of their
of conduct developed. However, the similarities in customary law group. Different people in the group know different laws. For
outweigh the differences. example, women have knowledge of some laws that they pass on
For example, under traditional law, the majority of Indigenous to girls at a certain age.
communities will generally see that disputes are not restricted to During ceremonial meetings at communal gathering
individuals. The resolution of the dispute, involving negotiation, places, laws are passed on by, and to, the appropriate people
mediation and conciliation, will involve everyone in the community. and reinforced often through dance and storytelling. Many
There are also offences that are not recognised by non-customary of these ceremonies are sacred and people from outside the
law but are punishable under traditional law. Examples include community are not permitted to participate or watch. The
insulting an elder and the singing of sacred songs in public. These stories have been handed down for thousands of years and
are offences in most Indigenous societies, regardless of where they explain things such as the creation of all things, why things
are located in Australia. happen, tribal boundaries, family relationships, cultural practices
and forbidden acts.
Ritual and oral traditions within kinship family relationships, including all extended family relationships;
Indigenous societies an important part of Indigenous cultures and values, which dictate how all
people in the group behave towards each other
It is expected that everyone in the community will follow and The relevance of customary
reinforce the traditional laws. In traditional societies, order is law today
maintained through self-regulation and consensus among family
heads. Elders play an important role in guiding decisions related to In the past twenty years there has been greater legal recognition
enforcing the law, intervening as necessary. of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders’ rights as the traditional
Offences under traditional law may be breaches of sacred landholders of Australia. Many aspects of customary law can be
law or offences against other persons or property. The boundary seen embodied in Australian law today. The practice of sustainable
between these categories is not always clear. Where sacred development, for example, is the basis for current environmental
law has been broken, elders are often directly involved in laws. Conciliation and mediation are increasingly used to resolve
applying sanctions. disputes in criminal, consumer and employment law.
Sanctions vary from place to place. The relatives of the Customary laws are also sometimes taken into account when
wronged party, ceremonial leaders, or both may be involved in an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander is charged with a crime. For
the punishment, the form of which may be determined through example, where an act has been done because Aboriginal customary
negotiations and/or kinship relationships. For the most serious law requires it, but the act amounts to an offence under Australian
offences, elders may need to ensure that the punishment is law, this may be raised in mitigation of the offence. Evidence that a
appropriately carried out and restraint is exercised. criminal offence was provoked by the victim’s breaking customary
4 Discuss why many of these stories are called ‘sacred’ particular course of action can have far-reaching implications for
Sources of international law According to the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969),
a treaty is an international agreement concluded between states
in written form and governed by the guidelines of international
The main sources of international law are customs, treaties, legal
law. Another way of looking at it is that a treaty is an agreement
decisions and legal writings.
between legal equals and may cover any sphere of international
relations between the parties.
Customary international law Treaties can be either:
Customary international law is not contained within a written ➥ bilateral – between two nations, for example the Agreement
document. Instead it is based on long-established traditions or between the Republic of Indonesia and Australia on the Framework
common practices followed by many states to the point that they for Security Cooperation (the ‘Lombok Treaty’), concerning their
are accepted as being fair and right by the international community. common security and respective national security; or
For example, customary international law regulating war had ➥ multilateral – between many states, for example the Charter of
been in existence for a long time before the Hague and Geneva the United Nations, which established the United Nations (UN)
Conventions explicitly outlined rules governing the conduct of and its organs and agencies. Each country that is a signatory to
states in conflict, such as the manner in which prisoners of war and this treaty has a seat in the General Assembly and participates
civilians were to be treated. in UN processes.
This form of international law develops over time, as it requires The more states that sign a treaty, the more powerful that treaty
‘constant and uniform’ practice of states in order to be accepted as will be. Treaties are used to make specific laws and to control
law. It should be noted that even if there is constant and uniform conduct and cooperation between and within states. A treaty
practice, it is still not considered law unless the states accept that the may also establish an international organisation, for example the
practice is binding upon them. This principle is termed opinio juris Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. There is no set
sive necessitatis (shortened to opinio juris). way of making a treaty, but most treaties are made through direct
Critics of customary international law point out that it can be negotiations between states. If all parties involved agree, the treaty
difficult to establish that it exists, and the time lag involved in its will be signed. A document will only become a treaty if all parties
being accepted as law has rendered it secondary to treaties and have the intention of being bound by its provisions and obligations
conventions as a source of international obligations. The number at the time of signing. The treaty only becomes binding on a state
of nations in existence since the end of the First World War has when that state ratifies it – that is, confirms that it intends to be
also grown considerably, so getting consensus has become more bound by the conditions placed on it by the treaty.
problematic. In addition, the rate of change in the world today For some countries, such as France, treaties that the country
is rapid and at times requires a more immediate response. For has ratified automatically become part of the domestic law. Other
example, what is the most effective means of limiting damage from countries require domestic legislation to be passed in order for the
the economic crisis of 2008? Would customary law or treaties be the treaty to be implemented into their law. In other cases, whether
more appropriate way of regulating global financial markets? domestic legislation is required will depend on the type of treaty.
Case Study
Child executions
There are still a handful of countries in the world today that
execute offenders for crimes committed when they were
under the age of 18.
It is evident that child executions breach international
treaties. Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights (ICCPR) states that ‘sentence of death shall
not be imposed for crimes committed by persons below
eighteen years of age’. Article 37 of the Convention on the
Figure 2.21 The International Criminal Court in The Hague, Rights of the Child (CROC) provides that ‘neither capital
the Netherlands
punishment nor life imprisonment without possibility
Declarations are also international instruments, but they differ of release shall be imposed for offences committed by
from treaties. Declarations state and clarify the parties’ position on persons below eighteen years of age’.
particular issues, but do not impose legally binding provisions that In Roper v Simmons, 543 US 551 (2005), the US Supreme
must be followed. A famous example is the Universal Declaration Court held that executing offenders who were minors
of Human Rights. The United Nations Commission on Human when they committed the crime violates the Eighth
Rights was established, following the Second World War and the Amendment, which prohibits ‘cruel and unusual
Holocaust, to draft the declaration – the first universal statement on punishments’. The court found that standards of
decency had evolved since 1989, when it had ruled
the basic principles of human rights. Among its chief purposes was
that the execution of 16- and 17-year-old offenders was
to define the meaning of the words ‘fundamental freedoms’ and
constitutional. There was now a national consensus that
‘human rights’, which appear in the UN Charter.
death is disproportionate punishment for juveniles. In
In 1948 the declaration was ratified by a proclamation by the
addition to state legislation and practice, the court had
United Nations General Assembly. Forty-eight countries voted in
also considered international trends.
favour of it, with none voting against it and only eight abstaining.
Bodies including the Inter-American Commission on
The declaration is the foundation for two binding UN human rights
Human Rights and Amnesty International believe that ‘the
covenants: the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
exclusion of child offenders from the death penalty is now
(ICCPR) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social so widely accepted in law and practice that it has become
and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). Its principles are contained in other a rule of customary international law’.
treaties as well.
Legal writings
Due to the changing international political landscape and the
developing nature of international law, the writings of respected
international lawyers, judges and academics have an important
part to play in guiding decision-making and treaty formation.
Along with judicial decisions, scholarly writings are mentioned in
Article 38(1)(d) of the Statute of the ICJ as a means of determining
the rules of international law. Scholarly legal writings may be
drawn upon for the purpose of interpreting treaties or determining
their application in international disputes.
Governments may also seek the advice of experts on matters
of international law. For example, in 2007 the Sydney Panel of
Independent International Legal Experts provided advice to
the Australian government on whether the legality of Japan’s
‘scientific’ whaling program could be challenged under the Figure 2.22 The UN headquarters in New York
PART I
Review 2.6
international law 1 Explain two different ways that the term ‘state’ can
to Australian law be used.
2 Identify what is meant by the term ‘international law’.
Multiple-choice questions
1 Which section of the Constitution outlines the legislative 3 Australia does not follow the doctrine of the separation of
powers of the Commonwealth government? powers in its pure form because:
a s1 a Australia does not have a president
b s 73 b members of the executive and the legislature are
c s 96 completely separate
d s 128 c some members of the executive are also members of the
2 On what grounds would it be unconstitutional for a legislature
current District Court judge to be elected to the House of d Australia is still a monarchy
Representatives while remaining a judge?
a it offends the division of powers
b it offends the separation of powers
c it would be ultra vires
d it is not allowed under the referendum provisions
of s 128
➔ identify and apply legal concepts and terminology ➔ describe the role of the law in conflict resolution and its
➔ describe the key features and operation of the ability to respond to and initiate change
Australian and international legal systems ➔ locate, select and organise legal information from a
➔ discuss the effectiveness of the legal system in dealing variety of sources
with relevant issues ➔ communicate legal information by using well-structured
➔ explain the relationship between the legal system and responses.
society
Key terms/vocabulary
balance of probabilities defendant prima facie
Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)/Crimes Act 1900 (ACT) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth)
Significant cases
Donoghue v Stevenson (1932) AC 562 Roach v Electoral Commissioner [2007] HCA 43
Odd law
Under s 513 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), it is an offence to steal or destroy shrubs and other plants. This section states:
Whosoever steals, or destroys, or damages with intent to steal, the whole, or any part, of any tree, sapling, shrub, or plant, or any
underwood shall, on conviction by the Local Court, be liable to imprisonment for 6 months, or to pay a fine of 5 penalty units, or both.
Legal Links
Go to www.cambridge.edu.au/prelegal3weblinks and
follow links to view the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), the Crimes
Act 1900 (ACT) and the Criminal Code 2002 (ACT) in full.
Figure 3.1 The Supreme Court of New South Wales
Vickie Lee Roach, a serving prisoner, took the case to the High
Contract law
Court on the ground that the Act as amended was unconstitutional.
Her team of lawyers argued that the new law breached her implied A contract is an agreement, or promise, between two or more
constitutional freedoms of political participation and political parties that is recognised by law. Contract law is concerned with the
communication. After hearing the case, the majority of the court recognition of this agreement and the actions taken to enforce it.
found the amended law to be invalid, but accepted the validity of When one of the parties to a contract believes that all or part of
the previous law, which banned prisoners from voting if they were the contract has been breached, he or she can bring a legal action
serving a term of three years or more. in a civil court. Damages are most often the common law remedy
available for breach of contract. Damages are viewed as a substitute
Private law for performance of the contract – that is, for the other party doing
what he or she agreed to do by signing the contract. Thus they are
designed to put the plaintiff in the position he or she would have
The aim of private law is to regulate relationships between
been in if the contract had been performed properly, that is, to
individual persons, companies and organisations. Private rights are
compensate him or her. The amount of compensatory damages is
protected by both statute and common law. When an individual
intended simply to provide the plaintiff with the benefits that he or
brings a court action against another individual for infringement
she would have had if the defendant had kept the agreement, not
of his or her private rights, it must be in a court exercising civil
to punish the defendant.
jurisdiction and the action is known as a civil proceeding. Three
The plaintiff may also seek one of the following remedies:
major areas of civil law are contract law, tort law and property law.
££ an injunction – this is an order usually directing a party not to
civil jurisdiction the power of a court to hear matters involving disputes do something, e.g. ordering the defendant to cease the conduct
between private individuals, and to award civil remedies breaching the contract. In some cases, an injunction may
The level of court where the case is heard depends on the level of involving things and interests that can be owned and that have
PART I
standard of proof the degree or balance of probabilities the
procedures
level of proof required in order for standard of proof required in a
the plaintiff (in a civil case) or the civil case in order for a plaintiff
prosecution (in a criminal case) to to succeed in proving the case
prove their case against the defendant
There are many differences between criminal and civil law court
cases. Before discussing criminal and civil court procedures in
examination in chief questioning of a witness by the barrister who called Coronial inquests
that witness
A coronial inquest will occur when there is an unnatural death
or an unexplained fire or explosion. The proceedings are more
credibility trustworthiness, reliability, believability inquisitorial than normal court proceedings, as the coroner’s office
will gather all of the evidence. If there is evidence that a serious
crime has been committed, the coroner will recommend that an
cross-examination questioning a witness called by the other side,
indictment be issued and the accused will be tried in a court of law
to produce information relevant to one’s case or to call the witness’s
credibility into question in the usual way.
burden of proof the responsibility of a party to prove a case in court Children charged with a crime are treated differently by the court
system, as immature persons are regarded as having a different
degree of responsibility from adults. Conviction by a Children’s
standard of proof the degree or level of proof required in order for the Court, even for a serious crime, has less severe consequences than
plaintiff (in a civil case) or the prosecution (in a criminal case) to prove
conviction in an ordinary criminal court. Most charges against
their case
people under 18 years of age are heard in a special Children’s Court
and a summary offence. The documents that the defendant and plaintiff will exchange
and file with the court, which set out the issues that are to be
2 Describe the task of the prosecution in a criminal trial
and how it goes about carrying out this role. decided by the court, are called pleadings. The statement of claim
or originating application will therefore be the first pleading in the
3 Compare and contrast the roles of the prosecution and
sequence of the case. There may be many pleadings, alternating
the defence in a criminal trial.
between the parties, over the course of the case.
4 Describe the role played by a jury. How are members
The defendant responds with a statement of defence. This
of a jury selected?
statement may deny or challenge the plaintiff’s allegations, or admit
5 What is a coronial inquest?
them but plead additional facts to counter the effect of admitting
6 Outline the ways in which children charged with a crime
them. A defendant may also file a counterclaim against the plaintiff.
are protected. Account for this protection. Do you think
At this stage, the parties are able to obtain more information
this is reasonable?
about each other’s arguments through a process called ‘discovery’.
This process allows each party to obtain information to assist
them in responding to the other party’s claims and allegations.
Research 3.1 Interrogatories are written questions submitted to the other party,
which must be answered. They must be relevant to a matter in
1 Go to the Lawlink website by following the link at
question. At this point, many civil disputes are resolved. In most
www.cambridge.edu.au/prelegal3weblinks.
cases legal practitioners prepare the documents, as they have
2 Who hosts this site? Why was it set up?
an understanding of the processes and can give appropriate and
3 Go to ‘Courts and tribunals’. Imagine that you are doing
timely advice on legal matters.
work experience at the local primary school and have
If the dispute cannot be settled, the matter will be referred to
to teach a Year 6 class about the local court. Develop an
trial. During the trial, each side has the right to produce evidence, call
internet activity based on the information on the website.
witnesses and carry out cross-examinations. When both sides have
presented all evidence, the judge will make a ruling. If the plaintiff
is successful, the judge will make a decision about the amount of
Civil procedure relief (or compensation) to be given to the plaintiff by the defendant.
This compensation usually takes the form of damages in a monetary
Civil proceedings are court actions that are the result of disputes form, or an injunction, which is a court order prohibiting specified
between individuals. Unlike criminal proceedings, they are initiated activities. Sometimes a specific performance will be required under
by individuals or organisations, rather than the state, and they deal the judgement, such as the completion of an action (e.g. the transfer
with such matters as breach of contract, property disputes and of the property in dispute).
negligence. The person who initiates the civil action, called ‘the
plaintiff’, will start proceedings by issuing a statement of claim pleadings written statements of the parties to a civil dispute that set out
the issues to be decided by the court
or a summons to the party who has committed the breach or the
Review 3.3
1 Draw a flow diagram showing the steps taken in civil legal c A woman is convicted of driving with a blood
action. alcohol level of 0.08.
2 How would you decide in which court to bring a personal d Your friend is caught with marijuana.
injury claim for negligence that resulted in medical bills of e You find a cockroach in a salad you just ordered
$100 000? in a restaurant.
3 What sorts of facts might be sought in discovery in a case f A neighbour’s music at 3 a.m. every night wakes you
involving a debt that was not paid? up constantly.
4 Decide whether the following cases involve criminal law or 5 Is it more difficult to prove a case in criminal law or civil
civil law: law? Why?
a You are held up at knifepoint and your mobile phone 6 With a classmate, make a poster (either by drawing or
is stolen. cutting out pictures) showing as many civil wrongs and
b A man trips over a box on the supermarket floor and criminal acts as you can. Draw up a table to list these and the
breaks an ankle. court in which cases about these wrongdoings will be heard.
1 3
5 6
7 2
4
4
4 4
real estate transactions, and the preparation of wills and contracts. a shorthand machine, or in audio and/or visual form. A transcript of
Traditionally, only barristers could represent parties in court. the proceedings is an accurate written record of what has been said.
Solicitors will most often prepare a brief for a barrister when a case
must go before a court, as well as doing research and providing Review 3.4
legal advice. In the Local or Magistrates’ Court, however, it is more
1 Outline the role of a judge or magistrate in court
common to see solicitors appearing on behalf of clients. For each
proceedings.
state and territory, there are separate associations for solicitors and
barristers, and in NSW, barristers and solicitors are issued different 2 Identify the forms of legal representation that are
available to a person who is having legal problems.
practising certificates.
Barristers often specialise in one area of law (e.g. family law), 3 Describe the roles of the judge and the jury in a
which allows them to develop a depth of knowledge and expertise court case.
in the area.
Solicitors will generally approach a barrister on behalf of their
client. The barrister will then represent the client in either a criminal Other participants
or civil court proceeding. Barristers have two main roles in court
proceedings: Corrective services officer
➥ To provide legal advice on the likely outcome of a court case,
A corrective services officer is required to guard the accused in a
based on the facts provided to them by their client. This allows
criminal case and escort that person to and from the courtroom.
the client to decide which course of action is best.
➥ To present their client’s case in court.
Jury
5 Witness A jury is a panel of citizens, selected at random, who consider
the evidence and decide on questions raised in the case. Their
A witness gives evidence to support the case in court. Both parties
job can be described as ‘fact-finding’, and their decision is called
can call witnesses. A witness must stay outside the courtroom until
a verdict. Before a court case begins, they are sworn in. In most
his or her name is called. When they are called they must take the
cases, a criminal trial involves a jury of 12 people. Civil cases may
witness stand and swear an oath or make an affirmation to tell
be heard by a judge alone or sometimes (in NSW) with a jury of
the truth.
four people.
The members of a jury are ordinary citizens selected at random
6 Court officer from the jury list, which is compiled from the electoral roll.
The court officer organises the court lists and calls witnesses into In a criminal trial, both the prosecution and the defence have
the courtroom. He or she administers the oath or affirmation, the right to challenge either the selection of the entire panel of
ensures that the public are seated in the right areas, and announces jurors, or individual jurors. ‘Challenges for cause’ are based on the
the arrival and departure of the judge or judges. The court officer person not being qualified to serve on a jury, being ineligible or
communicates questions from jurors to the judge and passes disqualified, or being suspected of bias. Both sides can also exercise
documents from the bar table to the associate, who passes them a certain number of ‘peremptory challenges’ of prospective jurors,
to the judge, jury or witnesses. He or she also advises the judge’s without having to give a reason. However, challenging the selection
Figure 3.11 The ruins of the Forum Figure 3.12 Common law in Australia has its origins Figure 3.13 The Palazzo della Consulta, seat
Romanum (Roman Forum) in customary law developed in England. This image of the Italian Constitutional Court, designed
shows Queen Elizabeth I in the Court of King’s bench – by Ferdinando Fuga (1732)
the highest common law court in England until 1875.
Multiple-choice questions
1 Why is criminal law prosecuted by the state rather than by 4 What can a plaintiff expect from a successful tort claim?
individual citizens? a compensation from the defendant in the form of damages
a Victims of crime are usually unable to afford legal b compensation from the state
representation. c an injunction to prevent the defendant from approaching
b Crime is considered a wrong against us all and thus a the plaintiff’s solicitor
matter of public law. d an order of specific performance
c Crime is often due to government decisions or policy and 5 Which of these statements about the burden and standard of
the state must take responsibility for it. proof is true?
d It is a matter of organisation and thus is a subset of
a The defence in a criminal trial must prove that the
administrative law.
defendant is innocent, beyond reasonable doubt.
2 What is the main purpose of administrative law? b The defendant in a civil trial must prove that the plaintiff’s
a to achieve justice in civil cases case is flawed, on the balance of probabilities.
b to ensure fairness in government decisions c The plaintiff in a civil trial must prove his or her case on the
c to allow people to bring criminal charges against balance of probabilities.
government departments d The plaintiff in a civil trial must prove that the defendant is
d to allow people to receive damages in civil cases guilty beyond reasonable doubt.
3 What is the High Court’s role in relation to the laws made by
parliament? Chapter summary tasks
1 Outline the main ways that a person can seek a remedy if a
a to decide whether they are consistent with the Australian
government decision is unfair. Do you think many people seek
Constitution
justice in this way? Justify your answer.
b to exercise veto power if necessary, when a bill comes
2 What remedies are available when you have a contract for
before parliament
services and the other party fails to do what they agreed to do?
c to ensure that they are consistent with international
treaties that Australia has signed 3 What is tort law? Discuss the idea that tort law has turned us
into a society that sues each other when things go wrong.
d to advise the minor parties on how they can get laws
passed 4 Explain the roles of prosecution and defence in a criminal case.
Key terms/vocabulary
Apprehended Domestic de facto relationship hung jury social values
Violence Order (ADVO)
forensic identity theft terms of reference
balance of power
fraud precedent Youth Justice Conferences
capital punishment
Hansard public morality
Property (Relationships) Act 1984 (NSW) Australian Law Reform Commission Act 1996 (Cth)
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) Law Reform Commission Act 1967 (NSW)
Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 (NSW) Jury Act 1977 (NSW)
Odd law
Legal costs can quickly spiral out of control. A case heard in the Federal Court of Australia, Croker v Commonwealth of Australia;
In the Matter of Croker [2010] FCA 1031, concerns the bankruptcy of an individual who purchased a pair of $50 cufflinks from the
High Court, and sued the court after alleging that the cufflinks became tarnished. The flurry of litigation resulted in the individual
contracting a debt of over $50 000, causing his bankruptcy. The final debt was therefore over 1000 times the original cost of the
allegedly tarnished cufflinks!
Changes to laws should not only recognise the changes taking place social values ethical standards public morality standards of
that guide people in their behaviour generally agreed upon
in society, but should reflect those changes which have produced
thinking about aspects of their by the community
better circumstances for significant portions of society, as well as society
providing protections against harm.
However, law reform is not always smooth or easy, as not all Figure 4.1 Historically, social values in Australia have been heavily
influenced by the Christian faith.
members of society may agree with particular changes to the law or
see the need for them. The extent of disagreement often depends
on the conditions that gave rise to law reform: in other words, on
what is driving the need to reform the law.
This chapter examines the conditions that give rise to law
reform, and the agents and mechanisms that can bring it about
once the reform needed has been identified.
Case Study
Whose social values should prevail?
In California, same sex-marriages were recognised when the Public morality is not clear-cut on this issue in California.
Supreme Court of that state ruled in May 2008 that legislation With legal challenges expected to follow the referendum result,
banning these marriages was discriminatory and violated the it may be some time before there is certainty in this area.
state constitution. Since then there have been many couples
who have legitimised their relationships in the eyes of the law
through marriage.
In November 2008, voters overturned the court ruling
by agreeing through referendum to change the state’s
constitution in a ballot called ‘Proposition 8’. In an article
titled ‘California Bans Same-Sex Marriage’, the BBC reported:
‘The referendum called for the California constitution to be
amended by adding the phrase: “Only marriage between a man
and a woman is valid or recognised in California.”’
The state’s Attorney General has stated that those marriages
conducted after the court ruling will remain valid. Figure 4.3 Americans protesting for Proposition 8 on gay marriage
Another notable example of changes in the way the law punishes based on an adversarial system in which the accused can put the
offenders can be seen in Youth Justice Conferences established witnesses for the prosecution to robust questioning. This has been
under the Young Offenders Act 1997 (NSW). This is discussed in more viewed as an important part of ensuring people are not wrongly
detail in Chapter 9. Youth Justice Conferences are an attempt to divert convicted. Finding the balance between ensuring the accused
young first-time offenders away from the court system and hence is able to pursue a defence fairly while avoiding re-victimising a
a criminal record. Their aim is to act as a ‘circuit breaker’ in a young victim is a challenge, and a specialist court may be better placed
person’s behaviour trajectory. A conference may involve members of to achieve this.
the community, the offender’s family, the victim and his or her family,
and professionals such as a social worker. Youth Justice Conferencing capital punishment the practice Youth Justice Conferences
of sentencing a person to death meetings of all the people who
has enjoyed support from the community, as it has achieved positive
by judicial process; also referred may be affected by a crime
results for young first-time offenders. Some have argued that it should to as the ‘death penalty’ committed by a young offender;
be used for a wider range of offences, including serious offences, used to help them to accept
responsibility for their actions
because it obliges the young person to consider the consequences of while avoiding the court system
his or her actions, in particular the harm caused to the victim.
Other law reform initiatives to address new concepts of justice
include circle sentencing for Indigenous offenders, the NSW Drug
Court and the enforcement of parenting orders in the Family Court, Research 4.1
to name a few. All of these reforms are attempts to deal with issues Refer to www.cambridge.edu.au/prelegal3weblinks for a list
that the current laws were clearly failing to address. of websites to research law reform in the areas listed below.
There has also been some speculation about the introduction of Identify how the initiatives work and assess whether they are
a specialist court to deal with sexual assault matters. This has been an improvement on the previous ways in which the law dealt
put forward because of a range of issues, including the sensitivity with these issues.
with which victims are treated during the legal process and an Circle sentencing
understanding of the context of sexual assault and what that means
NSW Drug Court
with respect to the physical collection of evidence from victims, in
Enforcement of parenting orders
addition to proving that consent was not given. Our legal system is
Review 4.2
Law reform commissions
1 What are the factors that have to be balanced
when introducing new legislation or amendments Law reform commissions have been established by various
that use scientific advances to increase police
parliaments within their own jurisdictions to report on
investigative powers?
matters referred to them under what is called the terms of
2 What are some other scientific advances that have led reference for a particular inquiry. The reports may contain
or may lead to legislative changes? List some of the
recommendations for ways to modernise or simplify the law, or to
factors that need to be considered or balanced when
eliminate defects.
making changes.
An essential feature of law reform commissions is that they
are independent of the parliament that established them. This
is important because political interference in the research and
reporting process can skew the findings. It has also been said that
when a government provides the terms of reference for an inquiry
into an area of law reform, it should not already know the answer.
In other words, the government should not know what the end
result or recommendations will be.
For the purposes of our area of study, the two law reform
commissions to be examined are the Australian Law Reform
Commission and the NSW Law Reform Commission.
The NSW Law Reform Commission Despite this advice, the NSW government passed the Jury
Amendment (Verdicts) Act 2006. It amends the Jury Act 1977 (NSW)
This Commission was set up under the Law Reform Commission Act
to allow majority verdicts of 11–1 or 10–1 after a reasonable
1967 (NSW). It was the first of its kind in Australia. It has a similar
time for deliberation has passed (not less than eight hours) and
role to that of the ALRC, but at the state level: to consider the
where the court is satisfied that it is unlikely the jury will reach a
laws of NSW with a view to eliminating aspects of the law that are
unanimous verdict.
out of date, unnecessary, too complex, or defective. Its role also
includes consolidating overlapping legislation, hence simplifying harmonisation agreement among the laws of different jurisdictions
the law. The NSW government will refer issues to the Commission
for investigation as to what, if any, law reform is necessary. In its
research it will generally consult with the public. sedition words or acts said or done with the intention of urging others
to use force against the government
A report released by the Commission in 2005 was on majority
verdicts in criminal trials.
The proposal was to investigate changing from unanimous
hung jury a jury that is unable to reach agreement
verdicts to majority verdicts of 11 or 10 jurors.
NGOs can work with governments where there are shared goals.
Non-government organisations
(NGOs) Figure 4.10 ActionAid Australia (formerly Austcare) is part of an
international anti-poverty agency that is active in over 40 countries.
4.4 Mechanisms of laws. If a political party holds government, it obviously has a greater
chance of its bills being passed. A bill’s fate, however, may depend
law reform on which party or parties hold the balance of power in the Senate
or, in NSW, the Legislative Council.
The mechanisms of law reform are the ‘machinery’ that actually Political parties present their policies to the voters prior to
brings about changes. These include judicial and legislative each election, and if voted into power they are expected to fulfill
branches of government, as well as international organisations. these promises. For example, the Labor Party, under former
Amending acts
The United Nations Parliament must pass another act to amend an existing act.
For example, the Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Act
The United Nations is the chief organisation involved in 2007 (NSW), which changed several sections of the Crimes
international law. The role of the United Nations in the (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 (NSW), was enacted and
development and implementation of international treaties was came into force through normal parliamentary procedures.
However, you will not find it in the current statutes of NSW,
outlined in Chapter 2. As such it is the primary mechanism in the
because it has been repealed. Indeed, s 4(1) of the Act states
evolution and reform of the law governing states.
that ‘this Act is repealed on the day following the day on
The effectiveness of the UN in promoting peace and security
which all of the provisions of this Act have commenced’.
around the world via international law is discussed in more detail in
What’s going on? Amending acts are passed for a very specific
Chapter 2. Law reform may take place when Australia implements
purpose: to amend another piece of legislation. Once this is
a treaty by passing domestic legislation that takes account of the done they are often no longer needed, though they must
international obligations. contain a provision to guard against their purpose being
‘undone’ when they are repealed. Section 4(2) of the Crimes
Intergovernmental organisations (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Act 2007 states that ‘the
repeal of this Act does not … affect any amendment made
As mentioned in Chapter 2, many intergovernmental organisations by this Act’. The function of an amending act is just that: to
(IGOs) are subsidiaries of the UN. These bodies are established amend. The act that it amends is called the ‘principal Act’.
to meet and decide upon certain international issues, such as View some amending acts, and previous versions of principal
acts, by choosing ‘History’ or ‘Acts (Point-in-Time)’ in an
refugees, tariffs and wealth. To this extent they contribute to
online legislation database.
international law reform on a global as well as a regional scale
through the promotion and development of multilateral and ‘Consolidated Acts’ and ‘In Force Legislation’ will contain acts
that are currently in force – i.e. that have not been repealed.
bilateral treaties.
3 Explain, using examples, how the law has lagged behind 8 Explain the extent to which law reform commissions are an
technology. effective instrument for changing the law.
4 Discuss the reasons why Australia no longer imposes capital 9 Explain how the United Nations can be a vehicle for law reform
punishment for murder. in Australia.
5 Describe the extent to which the law has improved its response 10 Outline the strengths and weaknesses of the courts and
to domestic violence. parliament as vehicles for law reform.
Key terms/vocabulary
Topic 1: Law reform and Topic 2: Law reform and sport Topic 3: Law reform and
native title assault sexual assault
dispossession civil litigation complainant
martial law conciliation consent
native title contempt of court in camera
nomadic express consent sexual assault
pastoralists indictable offence
terra nullius sponsorship
tort law
trespass to the person
vicarious liability
5.1 Conditions that led to The colonial laws and policies relating to Indigenous people
law reform on native title did not serve their interests, but were suited to the white colonists’
interests. Some examples of these laws and policies can be seen in
Table 5.1.
In basic terms, ‘native title’ refers to the right to land by the original
inhabitants. In Australia it has a legal significance and it is a right nomadic a term used to describe people who tend to travel and change
to an area of land, claimed by peoples whose ancestors were the settlements frequently
Protection (1869–1909)
– Aboriginal Protection Act 1869 (Vic) – These Acts gave wide powers to the Board for the Protection of
– Aborigines Protection Act 1909 (NSW) Aborigines, which governed where Aboriginal people could live
and work, what jobs they could do, and whom they could marry
and associate with.
– The powers of the Board under the NSW Act were similarly wide,
and included the power to remove children from homes to be
placed in missions.
– Nationality and Citizenship Act 1948 (Cth) – Aboriginal people became Australian citizens (as distinct from
British), along with everyone else, but not all states gave them
full rights, such as the right to vote in Commonwealth elections
– 1940s: ‘Exemption certificates’ or ‘Citizenship certificates’ were – Effectively, these certificates meant the holders were ‘not
given to some Aboriginal people by some states. Aboriginal’. The certificates had strict conditions, such as
requiring a ‘European lifestyle’, and could be revoked without
warning.
– 1962 amendments to the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Cth) – The amendments gave the right to vote in Commonwealth
elections to all Indigenous people in states that had not already
provided for this right.
– 1967 referendum amending the Constitution – The phrase ‘other than the Aboriginal race in any State’ was
removed from s 51(xxvi), giving the Commonwealth the power
to make laws specifically for the benefit of Aboriginal people.
Section 127, which provided that Aboriginal people were not
counted as part of the population for census purposes, was
deleted.
– Creating a nation for all of us (2011) – The final report from an Expert Panel recommends that
Presented to the Prime Minister in 2012 the Constitution be amended so as to show recognition of
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
dispossession the removal or expulsion of people from their martial law law enforced by the military over civilian affairs; overrides
traditional lands civilian law
Review 5.1
1 Describe the legal system of
Indigenous Australians prior to 1788.
2 Identify the Latin term meaning ‘land
belonging to no one’.
3 Describe the three main policies of
Australian governments in relation
to Indigenous people from 1788 to
1967. List one effect of each policy.
Figure 5.3 Under the policy of protectionism, Indigenous people were forced to live
on reserves – often under terrible conditions.
PART I
people in the area around the Yarra River in what is now Victoria.
Batman negotiated a treaty for the transfer of the land in exchange
legal system in relation for tools, weapons, food and blankets. Shortly thereafter, Governor
to native title Richard Bourke declared the treaty null and void, on the basis that
New South Wales – which extended from Cape York in the north
to Wilson’s Promontory in the south and nearly as far west as the
Figure 5.4 Indigenous Australians have a strong bond with the land.
have been extinguished under common law. Thus, the doctrine of The Mabo cases
terra nullius prevailed and they could not prevent mining on the
land. Three years after the unsuccessful Yolngu petition, members Between 1985 and 1992, Eddie Mabo and four other men from the
of the Gurindji people walked off the job at two cattle stations in Murray Islands challenged the Queensland government in two
the Northern Territory, protesting against poor working conditions cases in the High Court of Australia: Mabo v Queensland [1988] HCA
and pay. Their action was also a protest against dispossession of 69 and Mabo v Queensland (No. 2) [1992] HCA 23.
their traditional lands by pastoralists. The first case questioned the validity of a state law that
In 1972, the Australian Labor Party, led by Gough Whitlam, was attempted to abolish native title by asserting state ownership of
elected after 23 years in opposition. That year, the government the islands off the coast of Queensland. The High Court held that
established the Department of Aboriginal Affairs in response to the Queensland Act was inconsistent with the Racial Discrimination
the failure of the Gove land rights case. A royal commission into Act 1975 (Cth), because under it, the Meriam people’s right to own
Aboriginal land rights was established, under Justice Edward property would be limited to a greater extent than that of other
Woodward, who as a barrister had acted for the Yolngu people in members of the community. Under the Constitution, where federal
the case. The findings of the commission led to the drafting of the and state laws conflict, federal law prevails.
Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976 (Cth). This was The second case, now known as the Mabo case, concerned the
the first legislation in Australia to establish a land claim process by Meriam people’s rights to occupy and control Murray Island (Mer).
which traditional owners could claim various parcels of land that Although Eddie Mabo and one of his fellow plaintiffs died during
were listed as available for claim. this time, in May 1992, the High Court ruled (by six judges to one)
In response to the Gurindji land claim, the government that Australia was not terra nullius and that the Meriam people
negotiated with the owners of the stations to return part of the clearly held native title to their land.
land to the traditional owners. The photo above depicts Prime The decision of the High Court in the Mabo case introduced the
Minister Gough Whitlam symbolically handing native title back to legal doctrine of native title into Australian law. In recognising the
the Gurindji people in 1975. traditional rights of the Meriam people to their islands in the eastern
Torres Strait, the court also held that native title existed for all
pastoralists farmers raising sheep or cattle, usually on large areas of land Indigenous people in Australia prior to European contact. To make
Review 5.2
1 Describe the changing legal status of Aboriginal and
Torres Strait Islander people prior to 1967 and up to
1993. Why do you think laws have changed?
2 Outline how the Yolngu people’s native title claim was
resolved in court. What was the newly elected Whitlam
government’s response to this decision?
3 Explain the importance of the 1992 Mabo decision for
the legal status of Indigenous people.
4 Evaluate the statement made by Prime Minister Paul
Keating in 1993 on the passing of the Native Title Act.
Figure 5.7 Eddie Mabo took his challenge to the High Court and won. There has also been a move to give greater self-determination
to indigenous groups. Self-determination means the rights of
clearer the legal position of landholders and the processes that
indigenous peoples to control the use of their traditional lands,
must be followed in claiming native title, the federal government
as well as the local economy and social policy. Maori in New
passed the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).
Zealand, Inuit in Greenland and Canada, and Aboriginal and Torres
The Mabo case and the ensuing legislation significantly changed
Strait Islanders are three indigenous groups who have been given
the legal status of Indigenous people in relation to native title and
greater recognition in terms of native title and self-determination
gave some people access to parcels of land throughout Australia
in their own countries.
to practise their traditional way of life. It did not allow Indigenous
people to ‘own’ land, as this could, thereby, restrict current owners’
access to that land. In December 1993, during the passage of the
Legal Links
Native Title Bill through parliament, Prime Minister Paul Keating said: The Native Title Research Unit (NTRU) provides independent
[T]oday, as a nation, we take a major step towards a new and better research on native title. Information relating to native title
relationship between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australians. We can be found at its website (refer to www.cambridge.edu.
give the Indigenous people of Australia, at last, the standing they are au/prelegal3weblinks for link).
owed as the original occupants of this continent, the standing they
When claiming traditional ownership of land, Aboriginal and Torres encouraging discussion and debate about issues that concern
Strait Islander groups must have their claims legally validated. The all Australians. In this way parliament is able to address issues of
only courts that can make this determination in Australia are the equity and justice.
In 2008, the then Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, apologised
decisions about native title; it can only carry out research and make Speaking in the House of Representatives in Canberra on
recommendations. 13 February 2008, Mr Rudd said the parliament apologised for
Claimants may obtain one of three types of determination: laws and policies which had ‘inflicted profound grief, suffering
➥ unopposed determination (if the application is uncontested) and loss on these our fellow Australians’. Actions such as these
➥ consented determination (if the parties involved reach an by politicians and parliament are a way of bringing about social,
Review 5.3
1 Define ‘native title’ and ‘self-determination’. Which b a court decision whose consequences are as
Indigenous groups have gained greater recognition yet unclear
in these areas? c the concerns of groups within society about a
2 Assess the significance of the Mabo decision. court decision
3 What was the impact of the Wik case? 5 Describe the native title claim of the Yorta Yorta community.
4 Explain how a government might respond to the following. 6 Outline the legal history of their claim to native title.
Give examples. 7 Explain the reasons their claim was denied.
a a court decision whose outcomes or likely 8 How does this decision affect other native title claims?
consequences the government supports
Federal legislation
Native title legislation
Federal Parliament has enacted legislation to protect all parties
involved in and affected by native title claims. As discussed above, the
State legislation Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) was the Australian government’s response to
As discussed, the Mabo and Wik decisions led to Commonwealth the High Court’s Mabo decision. The Act provides for the recognition
legislation in the area of native title and self-determination for of native title and the integration of this form of property right into
Aboriginal people and Torres Strait Islanders. State legislation has the land title system. However, it does not allow the Commonwealth
also been enacted to give rights to and protect the interests of government to affect the operation of any law of a state or a territory
Indigenous Australians. that is capable of operating concurrently with this Act.
The National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 (NSW) provides for The Howard federal government responded to the High Court’s
the protection of places and relics which are of significance to Wik decision with the Native Title Amendment Act 1998 (Cth). The
Aboriginal culture. Under this Act, it is an offence to knowingly amendments incorporated the High Court’s decision that native
destroy, disturb or remove these objects or to destroy, deface or title rights could coexist on land held by pastoral leaseholders.
damage these places. The same government amended the legislation by the Native
The Aboriginal Land Rights Act 1983 (NSW) recognises that: Title Amendment Act 2007 (Cth) and the Native Title Amendment
➥ land was traditionally owned and occupied by Aboriginal people (Technical Amendments) Act 2007 (Cth). These changes also allowed
➥ land has spiritual, social, cultural and economic significance to for Township Leases. This is where the Australian government
Aboriginal people and the traditional owners in a township negotiate for a town be
5.3 Effectiveness of
law reform in relation
to native title
As we have seen, there has been progress in the area of law reform
relating to native title; however, this progress has been relatively
slow. Due to the very nature of the law, all stakeholders involved Figure 5.9 National Sorry Day, 13 February 2008
in (and affected by) native title claims must be considered when
proposing and enacting new legislation and, as such, the Native Title
Act 1993 (Cth) and its amendments recognises not only the rights of Review 5.4
the traditional owners, but also those of current landholders.
1 Draw a timeline showing the recognition of native title
Although one of the biggest legal steps forward was the
rights and self-determination for Aboriginal and Torres
overturning of the concept of terra nullius in the Mabo case, the Strait Islanders in Australia and in New South Wales.
initial use of terra nullius by the British has continued to be a major
2 Outline the major legislation governing native title at
stumbling block for those communities making native title claims;
the federal and state levels.
consider the Yorta Yorta people’s claim for their traditional lands
3 Describe the major federal and state legislation
in Victoria. The court cases took eight years and the claim was
protecting places and objects of cultural significance
eventually denied. The basis of the High Court’s determination was
for Indigenous people.
that the Yorta Yorta could not prove a recent history of traditional
4 In what way is native title a collective right?
ownership of this land. The main reason that they could not prove
5.4 Conditions that led suspensions from their sporting bodies for offences such as drink-
to law reform in sport driving and drug use. Despite an individual’s right to be considered
innocent until proven guilty in court, an NRL player, Brett Stewart,
was banned from four games in 2009 by the governing body after
‘Australia’ and ‘sport’ are terms that are almost synonymous.
being charged with sexual assault. Stewart was found not guilty
Sport is a part of Australian culture and Australians have performed
in his trial, 2 years later. The governing body, however, refused to
incredibly well on the world stage for many years. Winning world
apologise or compensate Stewart, claiming he had ‘brought the
championships is a matter of great pride, particularly in swimming,
game into disrepute’.
rugby union, netball and women’s basketball. In addition, Australian
Government has also taken a greater role in sport over
sport has become ‘big business’. The rise of full-time or professional
the past three decades. The Australian Institute of Sport (AIS)
sport means that athletes such as Greg Inglis (NRL), Lauren Jackson
was established in 1981 after more than 8 years of government-
(basketball) and Michael Clarke (cricket) are ‘at work’ when we watch
commissioned studies of sports institutes in Europe. The purpose
them play. These athletes are considered employees and their teams
of the AIS is to develop the highest quality sportspeople by
or organisations are their employers.
providing facilities and funding to athletes and organisations.
Large corporations now favour associating themselves with a team
In addition to changes in the way sport is seen, there have been
or competition through sponsorship deals that provide material
broader social changes that affect the ways in which sport and the
support in exchange for advertising. The names and logos of national
law interact. Gambling on sporting outcomes, in particular, has
and multinational companies can be seen on football players’ jumpers
risen to prominence in recent years. Legalised casinos have become
and prominently displayed around the grounds; a major sponsor of
the norm across all states of Australia and technology has allowed
Cricket Australia has been a fried chicken chain. A major sponsor of
online betting to flourish in the past 5 years. Greater willingness
five NRL teams and one of its playing grounds is a global betting
to hold others accountable for harm and to seek civil remedies
agency – Centrebet. These multimillion-dollar sponsorship deals
for real or perceived wrongdoing has affected both amateur and
enable the sponsor to gain exposure to millions of viewers.
professional sport. So, too, the rise of criminal convictions against
The standards to which players and coaches are held go beyond
stakeholders, such as Ryan Tandy, an NRL player, and his manager
the ordinary expectations of etiquette owed to the team and
and friends.
to competitors, as not only the club but the sporting code and
the sponsoring companies are brought under scrutiny by anti-
social behaviour.
Figure 5.10 From left to right: Cricketer Michael Clarke, basketballer Lauren Jackson and rugby player Greg Inglis
‘Sport law’ ranges over the areas of contract law, tort law, and The chief executive officer of the NRL called on the International
the criminal law, and encompasses efforts to promote safety in Rugby Board, the governing and law-making body for rugby union,
sport, to provide remedies for those injured, to regulate behaviour to stop Williams from switching codes. The board said it had no
on and off the field (including gambling), and to ensure equal jurisdiction over individual clubs’ contracts.
opportunity and fair treatment for individuals and groups who
engage in sport. As social attitudes change, the law must develop
accordingly. We will look at some of the areas in which it has had to
accommodate new patterns and demands.
As discussed in Chapter 4, law reform can be prompted by the
recommendations of specialised law reform bodies or various other
agencies or agents, and it can be brought about directly by court
decisions or legislation.
Figure 5.13 Tackles are fairly common in many contact sports. Taylor’s case, in the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal
(Taylor v Moorabbin Saints Junior Football League and Football
Victoria Ltd [2004] VCAT 158), questioned the exclusion of all girls
aged 12 or over from competing alongside boys in the junior
competitions. Despite anti-discrimination legislation in the various
states and territories and at federal level, all Australian jurisdictions
contain exceptions allowing exclusions on the basis of sex. The
Equal Opportunity Act 1995 (Vic) permits the exclusion of one sex
from a sport if strength, stamina or size is relevant. Post-puberty,
the average boy has greater lean body mass than the average
girl, and there is an appreciable difference in their performance
in sports. The judge’s task was to determine at what age there is a
lawful reason to separate the boys from the girls. He concluded that
the differences are not sufficiently great in the under-14 age group,
but they are sufficiently significant in the under-15 age group. So
excluding Helen Taylor was unlawful, though not the exclusion of
the other two girls. The judge added that it would be preferable if
Football Victoria would, instead of excluding girls, give them the
choice of whether to participate.
While the decision was a victory for Helen Taylor, questions
remain about its application to other sports, and how great the
differences between boys’ and girls’ physical attributes would
have to be in other sports in order to justify an exception to the
relevant legislation.
Follow the links at www.cambridge.edu.au/ (Cth). Gardner and AANA were unable to resolve the disagreement
prelegal3weblinks and look at the Anti-Discrimination in that forum and she took them to court, seeking an injunction to
Act 1977 (NSW). allow her to continue to play pending the outcome of her complaint.
1 Discrimination on the basis of sex is explicitly prohibited She missed three games due to the ban, but the Federal Magistrates
by this Act. What other characteristics of persons Court granted the interim injunction. As a result of missing those
besides their sex do not justify discrimination, according three games, Gardner lost match payments and sponsorship.
to the Act? Gardner successfully sued the Netball Association in 2003
2 Are any of these characteristics relevant to (Gardner v AANA Ltd [2003] FMCA 81), seeking damages for distress,
discrimination within sport? Can you imagine situations pain and suffering, as well as the loss of the match payments and
in which they might be relevant? Discuss. sponsorship money. The Federal Magistrates Court found that the
3 Is a person’s sex different in any way from these other prohibition had breached ss 7 and 22 of the Sex Discrimination Act.
characteristics? Why or why not?
conciliation a method of legal dispute resolution involving a third party
who helps the parties to reach agreement
relation to sport. You might first try searching the site using Act. The circumstances of pregnant women continuing to pursue
the word ‘sport’. sport at high levels constituted a new application of the anti-
discrimination legislation.
1 How could it be argued that the law as it relates to contact sports such as rugby if claims by students injured while
pregnant athletes should be different from ordinary playing become a common occurrence. Another concern is that
laws protecting equal opportunity for women athletes? players who are seriously hurt in situations where no one is at
fault – for example where a tackle is perfectly within the rules
3 Is a fight on a football field in a close match different as those awarded damages, yet insurance coverage may be
from a fight on a street corner and if so, should penalties inadequate to their needs. While these are legitimate concerns,
for fights on the sporting ground be less than for it is hard to see how law reform would be the appropriate means
assaults committed on the street? of addressing them.
5.8 Conditions that led have with the community (see Figures 5.17, 5.18 and 5.19).
to law reform relating to sexual assault a general term for criminal offences involving unwanted
sexual assault sexual contact; acts include unwanted touching or groping, indecent acts
of other kinds, and rape
Sexual Assault In addition, there has been a real lack of state resources
31% provided to doctors who work in sexual assault services. Training
for ‘Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners’ of sexual assault victims,
instead of doctors, was one area of need identified and the NSW
Department of Health commenced this training in 2004. Although
the nurse examiners have training in clinical practice and forensic
Age of client 0–15 2% assessments and routinely give evidence in court, this initiative was
seen by some as a ‘resource efficiency’ measure.
55+ As a result of these and other factors, most formal complaints
10% of sexual offences do not result in formal investigations and most
46–55 16–25
14% investigations do not lead to trials. The 2005 national Personal
28%
Safety Survey reported that only 19 per cent of women who had
experienced sexual violence by a male offender had reported this
36–45 to the police.
21% 26–35
25% In NSW the number of sexual offences reported to police
exceeded the number of proven charges by about ten to one. …
[A] pproximately 8% of sexual offences committed against children
and 10% of recorded sexual offences against adults reported to
police are ultimately proven at court.
Figure 5.18 and Figure 5.19 – Source: NSW Rape Crisis Centre, 2011 Jacqueline Fitzgerald, ‘The Attrition of Sexual Offences
from the New South Wales Criminal Justice System’,
Under-reporting can be attributed to the following factors. Many 92 Contemporary Issues in Crime and Justice (January 2006),
NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research
victims do not report sexual assault because they believe they
would not win a court case or that it will be too much trouble, or Given the estimates of the number of unreported incidents, this
they cannot face it emotionally. Compounding this is the fact that conviction rate represents a small proportion of the incidents that
in 70 per cent or more of cases, the offender is known to the victim, are occurring. It is worth asking why this is the case, especially when
making proof more difficult. compared to all other categories of crime.
was overturned in the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal and a new have led to some of the law reform measures outlined
below? Discuss.
trial ordered. When sensationalistic coverage gives a jury access to
inadmissible material, the jury’s ability to ignore this information
may be put into doubt and thus the accused may not receive a fair
trial. The judges said this was regrettable but ‘a conviction following Legal Links
an unfair trial is a conviction obtained at too high a price’.
For more information on the NSW Rape Crisis Centre follow
In other cases, the media’s influence on public opinion, the link at www.cambridge.edu.au/prelegal3weblinks.
law organisations and governments has resulted in changes
that improve the treatment of victims of serious sexual assault
crimes in court. Victims being forced to recount their experience
5.10 Mechanisms of law
reform relating to sexual
over and over, and defence counsel badgering victims in cross-
examination to call their credibility into question, have been
graphically portrayed by the media and have horrified the assault
public and many in the legal profession. Frequently, however,
the positive outcomes have been accompanied by less desirable Parliament
ones, such as the rights of the accused being accorded a fairly low
importance, and a readiness to exploit the prejudices of some There have been many Acts passed by the NSW Parliament over the
segments of the public. In the 2004 Sydney gang rape trials, an past few years to usher in reform in sexual assault matters. Some of
ugly racist theme surfaced in some of the public rhetoric, focusing the key legislation has been:
on the ethnicity of the rapists. The media can be an unreliable ➥ Criminal Procedure Amendment (Sexual Offence Case
instrument of justice. Management) Act 2005 (NSW): This Act amended the Criminal
5.11 Effectiveness of law Finally, continuing efforts to educate the public are equally important.
Sexual assault crimes are crimes of violence, and certain beliefs about
reform relating to sexual gender in our society need to be articulated and challenged if these
grounds’ for believing that there was consent will unfairly prejudice reform in the area of sexual assault crimes? Give examples.
juries against a defendant. 2 What other agencies have had a role in bringing about
At this stage it appears that the reforms are having little changes to the way trials are conducted? Classify each
of these agencies with respect to their function and
practical impact. Figures from the NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics
purpose within the legal system.
show that police only arrested offenders in 21 per cent of the sexual
assault cases that were reported in 2007. Further figures show the 3 Outline some of the changes that have taken place.
success rate of the police in solving sexual assaults has dropped 4 How could success in this area be measured?
dramatically. Police were solving double the number of cases Give examples.
Topic summary
➔ ‘Native title’ refers to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ➔ The 1967 referendum amended the Constitution to allow the
peoples’ right to an area of land with which they have had an Commonwealth to legislate for Indigenous Australians, and to
ongoing association. allow them to be counted in the census.
➔ The concept of terra nullius was used to justify the ➔ The Mabo case was a significant High Court decision that
implementation of British law and the dispossession abolished terra nullius and led the federal government to pass
of indigenous peoples. the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).
➔ Further state and federal legislation and court decisions have
been instrumental in law reform in the area of native title.
Multiple-choice questions
1 British policies towards Indigenous Australians were based on 4 The aim of the national native title tribunal is:
which of the following? a to assist with native title negotiations
a colonial conquest, then attempts at assimilation b to determine whether a particular place is terra nullius
b mediation c to advise the Federal Court of Australia on native title
c native title d to hear criminal cases involving Indigenous Australians
d implied rights contained in the Constitution 5 Which of the following statements is true of native title?
2 What was the effect of the 1967 amendments to the Australian a It can be claimed by an individual.
Constitution? b It is a collective right shared by a group.
a They gave Indigenous people the right to vote. c It is the modern term for terra nullius.
b They allowed the Commonwealth to make laws for d It is contained in s 128 of the Constitution.
Indigenous Australians, and allowed them to be counted
in the census. Topic summary tasks
c They gave them native title. 1 In your own words, describe the Myall Creek Massacre. Why do
d They gave Australian citizenship to all Aboriginal people you think this massacre occurred?
in NSW and Victoria.
2 Create a timeline outlining the key stages of Indigenous
3 Which of the following statements is true of the Wik decision? Australians’ right to vote in federal elections.
a It gave Indigenous people native title over all pastoral land.
3 In your own words, discuss the aims of the Native Title Tribunal.
b The High Court held that pastoral leases could coexist with
Why was it established?
native title, but where there was a conflict, the pastoral
4 Who was Eddie Mabo? How did he change Indigenous rights?
lease took priority.
5 Describe the relationship between court decisions and
c It overturned Mabo.
subsequent legislation, and explain how law reform relating
d The High Court found that the Native Title Act 1993 was
to native title has taken place so far.
unconstitutional.
Multiple-choice questions
1 Sport law is: 5 The case of Trudy Gardner demonstrates:
a the rules of any particular sporting body a a conflict between sporting rules and anti-discrimination
b the law made by the Australian Sports Commission laws
c a combination of various statutes, common law b how sporting bodies are subject to legal action
judgements and tort law c the ability of individuals to challenge decisions in courts
d none of the above d all of the above.
2 Express consent is a term that means:
a Players may do whatever it takes to win a game. Topic summary tasks
b What happens on the field stays on the field. 1 Outline the changes in attitudes to sport that have occurred
c Players must give consent before they play a game. over the past few decades. List some of the consequences of
d Players accept the possibilities that can occur within the these changes.
course of the game.
2 Explain the importance of the law in governing on-field
3 Victims of assault on a sporting field usually take legal action behaviour in contact sports.
through civil courts because:
3 Explain how contract law relates to professional athletes and
a Criminal law does not apply on the sporting field.
clubs. What can happen if a contract is breached?
b Victims’ compensation is inadequate for professional
athletes. 4 Why do you think victims of violence on the sporting field do
d Witness statements from players cannot be accepted 5 Discuss two ways in which women’s participation in sport has
in courts. led to law reform.
Topic summary
➔ There has been significant law reform relating to sexual assault ➔ Agencies of law reform relating to sexual assault include
over the past decade, prompted by the failure of the criminal parliamentary inquiries such as the Criminal Justice Sexual
justice system to deliver just outcomes for victims. Offences Taskforce, non-government organisations such as the
➔ Sexual assault is a crime with one of the lowest conviction NSW Rape Crisis Centre, and professional organisations.
rates in NSW due to investigation failures, delays in cases, a ➔ The media have been influential in putting pressure on
lack of resources and a lack of information provided to victims. governments to reform the laws relating to sexual assault.
➔ Since 2005, various laws have been passed in NSW to improve
criminal procedure in relation to sexual assault cases.
Multiple-choice questions
1 Which of the following was not a reason to reform the law in 4 The Crimes Amendment (Consent – Sexual Assault Offences) Act
the area of sexual assault? 2007 (NSW) changed the Crimes Act with respect to consent.
a low rate of reported sexual offences Which of the following is correct?
b low rate of convictions a Documentary evidence is needed to establish consent.
c poor level of service to victims in terms of information and b The onus of proof of consent has been reversed.
resources c Partial consent may be established.
d the media were insufficiently interested in sexual assault d None of the above.
cases 5 The Criminal Procedure Further Amendment (Evidence) Act 2005
2 The Criminal Justice Sexual Offences Taskforce set up in 2004 (NSW) made which of the following changes to the Criminal
has brought about which of the following changes? Procedure Act 1986 (NSW)?
a legislation to improve procedures regarding the giving of a Hearsay evidence can now be admitted to prove that the
evidence complainant consented to sexual intercourse.
b legislation requiring judgements to reflect public opinion b It prohibited the cross-examination of victims by an
about sexual offenders accused person representing himself.
c a greater number of sexual offences reported c It allows a transcript or recording of a complainant’s
d a statutory requirement that the media report cases with evidence in any retrial.
greater understanding of the law d It reaffirmed the right of an unrepresented accused to
3 The NSW government asked the Australian Institute of cross-examine the alleged victim.
Criminology (AIC) to investigate whether giving evidence via
closed-circuit television altered the way in which the evidence Topic summary tasks
was received: that is, whether it affected juries’ empathy for 1 Outline the main issues that prompted law reform in the area
the victim or the accused. Which of the following best reflects of sexual assault.
those findings? 2 Discuss the changes to the law of consent from the perspective
a Juries were more likely to favour the accused. of the victim and the accused.
b Juries were more likely to favour the victim. 3 Identify and describe the role of some non-legal measures in
c There was no difference in jury responses. addressing the effectiveness of the law in dealing with sexual
d Closed-circuit TV evidence was more likely to permit the assault.
presentation of graphic evidence. 4 Describe at least three reforms to the law relating to sexual
assault.
5 Assess the effectiveness of law reform in addressing the issues
around sexual assault.
Principal focus
Through examining the roles of legal and non-legal institutions, laws and media reports, students will
gain an understanding of how the law impacts on individuals
➔ investigate the effects of legal and non-legal institutions on ➔ evaluate the effectiveness of legal instruments for achieving
individuals justice for both individuals and society
➔ explore the relationship between rights and responsibilities ➔ identify and apply appropriate legal terms and concepts.
in various contexts
➔ discuss the necessary balance between the rights of
individuals and of the state
Key terms
bill of rights political autonomy rights self-executing
Relevant law
Important legislation Significant cases
Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) Progressive Mailing House Pty Ltd v Tabali Pty Ltd [1985] HCA 14
Summary Offences Act 1988 (NSW) Wilson v Tyneside Window Cleaning Co. [1958] 2 QB 110
World Youth Day Act 2006 (NSW) Evans v State of NSW [2008] FCAFC 130
Figure 6.1 Voting is compulsory for Australian citizens over the age of 18. Apart from being compulsory, voting is also a right.
Common law
Other rights are protected by common law, particularly in contract
law and tort law. For example, if one party to a contract breaches
6.2 The nature of
a term of the contract (that is, fails to do what he or she agreed individual rights
to do), and the term that has been breached is a very important
one, the other party has the right to end the contract (Progressive The distinction between moral
Mailing House Pty Ltd v Tabali Pty Ltd [1985] HCA 14). Or to take a
and legal rights
very general example that we have seen in the context of tort law, if
someone purchases a product, he or she has a common law right to
The main difference between legal rights and moral rights is that
enjoy it without being exposed to anything harmful or unpleasant
people can argue from different ethical viewpoints about whether
(Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562).
a certain moral right exists, whereas legal rights are contained in
statutes or in the body of decisions constituting common law, and
Legal basis of responsibilities it cannot be disputed that these are binding in the jurisdictions to
which the statute or the common law applies. Although people
As stated above, where someone has a right, someone else has a
might argue that a particular law or common law principle is not
corresponding responsibility.
just – in other words, that it should not be the law – if it is currently
the law it cannot be argued that it is not currently binding, whether
Statute someone likes it or not.
While moral rights and responsibilities may have binding force
Legal responsibilities are also called ‘obligations’ or ‘duties’. An
for everyone, only those who believe that they are binding are
example of a statutory obligation is parents’ duty to send their
likely to behave accordingly and try to persuade others to do so. In
children to school or to arrange for their children to be home
other words, moral rights and responsibilities are not enforceable.
schooled. Another is the duty of the state to ensure that every child
While many laws have been passed because they agree with the
has the best possible education, and to provide public schools.
moral views of most people in a community, and are complied
These duties are contained in Acts such as the Education Act 1990
with for similar reasons, the law is sometimes slow to change to
(NSW), and are based on the principle, stated in s 4 of the Act, that
reflect changes in social attitudes and public morality. As discussed
every child has the right to an education.
in Chapter 4, this is why law reform is an important feature of
Australian law.
Common law An example of a controversial moral right is the right to die.
Other legal responsibilities are based on the common law. For Some people diagnosed with terminal illnesses have argued that
example, the duty of care is a well-known common law duty. they have a right to die if they choose, rather than suffering pain
As expressed in Donoghue v Stevenson, it is owed to all persons and loss of dignity. However, euthanasia is not a legal right in any
who are likely to be ‘closely and directly affected’ by your Australian jurisdiction.
Another example is the right in NSW to engage in sexual activity. mainly with succession to the throne and the way in which English
Consensual heterosexual and homosexual sex is legal for persons law was to be adopted in its colonies (see p. 145 on the ‘doctrine
over the age of 16. However, many religious and social leaders in our of reception’). As one of the 47 member countries of the Council
community would argue that this age is inappropriate. Hence, while of Europe, the UK is a party to the European Convention for the
persons over 16 have a legal right to consensual sex, some would Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (1953) and
dispute the existence of a moral right to it. is bound by it. The UK introduced the Human Rights Act 1998 to give
further effect in UK law to the rights contained in this convention.
A bill of rights? In the US, the Bill of Rights, ratified in 1791, consists of the first
10 amendments to the Constitution and contains fundamental
Protections provided by bills of rights rights of individuals in private life, in the criminal justice process,
and with respect to the government generally.
Countries including the US, the UK and New Zealand have a
New Zealand’s Bill of Rights Act 1990 contains civil, democratic
document known as a bill of rights. Such a document sets
and human rights, including freedom from discrimination, and
out specifically what individuals are entitled to expect of their
freedoms from government intrusions into individuals’ lives.
government. Australia is the only western democracy that does not
Table 6.1 shows some examples of rights contained in bills
have one.
of rights.
Although the UK has no single constitutional document, the
English Bill of Rights of 1689 sets out a few fundamental rights and
bill of rights a statement of basic human rights and privileges
is still in force today. However, it is limited in its scope and deals
The right to freedom of thought, Congress shall make no law respecting an The right to freedom of thought, conscience,
conscience, religion, and belief, establishment of religion, or prohibiting and religion (Article 9); freedom of expression,
including the right to adopt and to the free exercise thereof; or abridging including freedom to hold opinions and to
hold opinions without interference (s the freedom of speech, or of the press receive and impart information and ideas
13); freedom of expression (s 14) (Amendment I) without interference (Article 10)
Everyone who is arrested shall be No person shall be held to answer for a capital Everyone charged with a criminal offence
informed of the reason; shall have crime unless on a presentment or indictment has the right to be informed of the nature
and be informed of: the right: to of a grand jury, nor compelled in a criminal and reason for the accusation, to have
consult a lawyer, to be released if the case to be a witness against himself, nor be adequate time and facilities to prepare his
arrest is not lawful, to be charged deprived of life, liberty or property without defence, to have a lawyer, to have witnesses
and brought to court promptly or due process of law (Amendment V) The right on his behalf under the same conditions as
released, and not to be a witness to a speedy and public trial by jury, to be witnesses against him, to have a fair trial, and
against himself (s 23) informed of the nature and reason for the to be presumed innocent until proved guilty
accusation, to have a lawyer (Amendment VI) (Article 6)
For Against
££ Australian law gives insufficient protection to fundamental ££ Rights are already protected by statutes and the common law.
freedoms, and a bill of rights would enshrine those rights.
££ A bill of rights would make our current laws more cohesive ££ A bill of rights makes little practical difference in the
and accessible, rather than being ‘locked up’ in past protection of rights.
judgements and statutes.
££ We are becoming increasingly internationalised and need to ££ Enabling judges to strike down laws made by parliament that
be aware of international laws. A bill of rights would bring are inconsistent with a bill of rights would be undemocratic.
Australia in line with other countries
££ A bill of rights would allow Australia to meet its international ££ Rights written in a bill of rights can become outdated very
obligations more effectively. quickly in a rapidly changing world.
££ A bill of rights would protect the rights of minorities. ££ A bill of rights would actually restrict rights, because
once defined, a right is limited by the words in which it
is expressed.
££ The High Court’s interpretation of ‘implied rights’ in the ££ The judiciary would become too political if there were a bill
Constitution is too limited: we need a document explicitly of rights.
setting out our rights.
Conflicts between rights and Other conflicts between the rights of individuals and the state
Figure 6.7 Tasmanian logging and woodchipping company Gunns brought civil action against individuals and environmental groups for a number
of alleged acts of protest against its activities in logging natural growth forests.
implied rights civil and political rights that can be inferred from the
Constitution, rather than being expressly stated
Review 6.3
1 Explain the difference between an ‘express right’
and an ‘implied right’.
2 What rights are expressly guaranteed by the
Constitution?
3 Do Australians have a right to free speech? Justify
your answer.
4 Examine the case of Milorad Trkujla on page 136. Figure 6.9 Defending free speech can be very expensive if you are taken
to court for defamation.
Dan Oakes
Sydney Morning Herald, 12 November 2012
A Melbourne man who won a defamation case against search Mr Trkulja, an elder at a Serbian Orthodox Church in
engine giant Google has been awarded $200,000 in damages. Springvale, also won $225,000 in damages from Yahoo earlier
Milorad Trkulja, also known as Michael, sued the this year over the same matter.
multinational over images of him alongside a well-known Google’s lawyers argued the search engine was not the
underworld figure that appeared in its search results. publisher of the material and was only indexing the link to the
A six-person Supreme Court jury found last month that website and the images in its results.
Mr Trkulja had been defamed by the images, which he first The company used the ‘ innocent dissemination’ defence,
contacted Google about removing in 2009. arguing it was providing links to the content without knowing
The images were posted after Mr Trkulja was shot in the back that the material was defamatory.
by an unknown gunman while eating with his elderly mother at However, the jury found Google’s defence of the images
a St Albans restaurant in June 2004. broke down because it did not take any steps to remove the
When Mr Trkulja’s name was typed into Google’s image images from its searches once Mr Trkulja’s lawyers contacted the
search, photos had appeared of him alongside gangland figure company. The jury found the search engine was not liable for
Tony Mokbel. the search results themselves, as Mr Trkulja had incorrectly filled
Google search results also linked to a page on a now defunct out a form for reporting offensive material by not including the
website, Melbourne Crime, which had published photos URL of the content to which he objected.
labelled with his name. The website that hosted the image has since been taken
Mr Trkulja said he had never initially intended to sue Google down and the images or the article are no longer indexed by
but had been galvanised into action after his request for the Google’s search engine.
content to be removed from its searches in 2009 was not granted. A Google spokesman said in response to the ruling: ‘Google’s
Supreme Court Justice David Beach this morning said in search results are a reflection of the content and information
awarding the damages that the case was about ‘vindication’ and that is available on the web. The sites in Google’s search results
‘nailing the lie’. are controlled by those sites’ webmasters, not by Google.’
Review 6.4
Read the media clip and answer the following questions:
1 Describe Mr Trkulja’s objection to the photos of him linked by Google search.
2 Outline how Mr Trkulja felt he was defamed and why he proceeded with the defamation case.
3 Evaluate the current laws on defamation. What responsibilities do you have when you talk about someone else?
6.4 International has passed domestic legislation to implement the treaty as part of
protection of rights its own laws. In Australia, treaties must be implemented through
domestic legislation in order to become binding.
Declarations are different from treaties in that they simply
As discussed in Chapter 2, international law can be made through the state the parties’ intentions; they express the international
formation of treaties between two or more nations. Treaties become community’s aspirations with respect to an area of human rights.
binding on the citizens of an individual nation either automatically They are generally developed through the United Nations (UN)
upon ratification, if the treaty is self-executing, or once the nation or other international organisations, such as subsidiary bodies
of the UN or the World Trade Organization, and while they are not a key right of peoples. It means the right of a group to determine
legally binding, they are morally binding and influential in setting their own political status (how they want to be recognised), and
standards for the protection of rights. to pursue their own economic, social and cultural development.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is an important Self-determination is enshrined in the UN’s Charter, as well as in
declaration of the rights to which all humans are entitled. The the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the
following extract summarises what the UN is trying to achieve International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
internationally. Article 15 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (see above)
expresses this right in terms of all individuals’ right to a nationality.
self-executing (of a treaty) automatically becoming binding on a state
The UN Charter, Chapter 1, Article 1, part 2 includes self
party to the treaty as soon as the treaty has been ratified
determination as one of the purposes or goals of the UN:
To develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for
the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, and
Limitations of international law to take other appropriate measures to strengthen universal peace.
Circle sentencing
Circle sentencing courts have been established in several locations
Figure 6.10 People at a rally showing their concerns about the Indonesian
occupation of East Timor. in NSW, the ACT and WA. Their introduction is based on Canadian
experience with Indigenous communities and has the goal of
One place where the UN has intervened, with some limited
preventing crime, supporting victims and giving Indigenous people
success, has been in East Timor (now TimorLeste). Indonesia, the
greater involvement in the criminal justice system. Sentences
former ruling power of East Timor, opposed the independence
are more likely to be meaningful for the offender if imposed by
movement for many years, as East Timor contained considerable
authorities within his or her own culture.
resource wealth and lay geographically within the Indonesian
Circle sentencing works in the following way. When an accused
archipelago. In 1999, the UN intervened and was assisted by
person in a criminal trial has pleaded guilty or been found guilty,
Australian troops to keep the peace between pro- and anti-
and is a member of an Indigenous community, the magistrate
independence supporters while a referendum was held. Although
travels to the accused’s community for the purpose of sentencing.
a large majority of East Timorese voted for independence
The magistrate and other persons sit in a circle, discuss the matter
from Indonesia, violence and internal conflict continued, with
and arrive at an appropriate sentence. The group will include
pro-Indonesian militias launching attacks from within and
the offender, the victim and their families, as well as respected
outside East Timor, and an assassination attempt on President
members of the local Indigenous community.
José Ramos-Horta in 2008.
be addressed from a general viewpoint but also considered in 2 How are those rights enforced? Suggest some possible
the context of the particular historical facts of a place. The UN ways they could be more effectively enforced.
at all. The ‘doctrine of reception’ mandated that uninhabited land 1 What are the aims of circle sentencing?
colonised by Britain would be subject to English law – despite the 2 What are the benefits?
vastly different languages, cultures, beliefs and traditions of the 3 What are the drawbacks?
people who actually inhabited the land.
4 What sort of right is the right to euthanasia? 8 What other rights are not expressly contained in the Australian
5 How is the right to freedom of speech protected? critical things to say about a political figure?
➔ investigate the roles of various law enforcement agencies ➔ compare and contrast individuals’ disputes with other
➔ discuss various methods of dispute resolution between individuals and with the state
individuals ➔ identify the difference between formal and informal
➔ investigate formal and informal methods of dispute methods of challenging state power as the state attempts to
resolution between individuals and the state enforce rights
➔ assess the effectiveness of legal and non-legal instruments ➔ identify and apply appropriate legal terms and concepts.
in resolving disputes between individuals and the state
Key terms/vocabulary
alternative dispute resolution arbitration freedom of information (FOI) negotiation
apprehended violence Australian Federal Police law enforcement agencies state police
order (AVO)
conciliation mediation
Criminal Code, contained in the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth)
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW)
Significant cases
Toonen v Australia, Communication No. 488/1992, UN Doc Croome v Tasmania [1997] HCA 5
CCPR/C/50/D/488/1992 (1994)
Odd law
Wills can often be a source of family conflict. In one famous example, the US industrialist Wellington Burt denied two whole generations
of his family a share of the proceeds of his estate, estimated to be worth between $40 million and $100 million. Provoked by family feuds
that had arisen during his lifetime, Burt’s will stated that the bulk of his estate was not to be settled until 21 years after the last of his
descendants then living (including grandchildren) had died. Burt’s last grandchild passed away in 1989 and, in 2010, the $100 million
estate was shared out between 12 descendants – great-grandchildren, great-great grandchildren and great-great-great grandchildren.
Police do not make the laws; they only enforce them. They try found that the shocks had led to or contributed to the death.
to see that law and order in a community are maintained by Another problem with CEDs is that they are open to abuse by
preventing unlawful acts, investigating crimes and arresting police officers and there appear to be few guidelines or restrictions
The police have rules that they must obey when they perform officers. Amnesty International’s study found that 90 per cent of
these duties. To ensure that evidence is collected correctly and thus those who died after having a CED used on them were unarmed
is able to be used by the prosecution in a court case, the police are and did not pose a threat to the public. Information on the NSW
covered by a code of practice. This code covers: Ombudsman’s special report to parliament on the use of CEDs in
Each state and territory in Australia has its own police force. The capsicum spray before using a taser gun to apprehend Mr Curti.
New South Wales Police Force is primarily concerned with enforcing He died as a result. Coroner Mary Jerram stated that the actions of
criminal law, particularly those offences contained in the Crimes police were reckless and excessive.
Act 1900 (NSW). Some of the most serious crimes are clearly those
law enforcement agencies those bodies that have the role of enforcing
against the person, such as homicide, manslaughter and sexual the law; they are created by Acts of Parliament and include the police and
assault. More recently, new laws have been passed to combat some government departments
Figure 7.3 Illegal drugs being intercepted by Australian Customs and murders, attempted murders and suspected murders over
Border Protection Service. a 15-year period.
Government departments
Some Commonwealth and state government departments have Review 7.1
the authority to enforce specific laws. The Australian Tax Office 1 What is a law enforcement agency? Give an example of
(ATO) has the power to enforce certain laws for the protection and a government body that has enforcement powers and
benefit of society. For example, under the Income Tax Assessment briefly summarise its specific aims.
Act 1936 (Cth), the ATO can investigate and prosecute individuals or 2 Explain the role of the police in the legal system.
companies in relation to tax offences. Comment on the importance of jurisdiction in law
The main issues relating to income tax involve either the enforcement.
avoidance of tax or the underpayment of tax. In 2007, Glenn
Media Clip
Chainsaw and samurai sword used in neighbours’ clash over loud music
Nick Ralston
Sydney Morning Herald, 2 May 2012
A neighbourhood dispute over loud music and erratic driving Jorgensen household complained about Ms Halls playing
has escalated into a bloody brawl in which a chainsaw partially loud music.
severed a man’s arm. The Thorntons claim that someone from the Jorgensen
Doctors are attempting to reattach the arm of Mark household then drove in a dangerous and threatening manner
Jorgensen, 29, after the altercation in in Fenton Close, Minto, towards them.
last night. Police were called and the two families were told to return to
Another man, Troy Thornton, 26, lost a finger in the dispute. their homes.
His sister, Nicole Thornton, claimed he was attacked with a But tensions escalated again just before 9.20pm, resulting in
samurai sword. the chainsaw being produced.
Mr Thornton, a father of two, lives in Queensland but was Ms Thornton claimed members of the Jorgensen household
in Sydney to attend the funeral of his sister’s partner, Peter tried to invade their family’s home.
Reinhardt, who drowned when his boat overturned on the ‘Basically we ended up all in a brawl,’ she said. ‘The guys from
Nepean River in March. next door. By then there was 20 of them with bats, swords and
As Ms Thornton kept a waterside vigil with her newborn poles.
baby, the couple’s Londonderry home was robbed. Thieves took ‘It was me, my mum and my sister taking on guys, so my
jewellery, cash and a gun. brother has gone and got the chainsaw.’
The Thorntons’ mother, Wendy Halls, said it had been a Ms Thornton said her brother was attacked with the sword
traumatic few months for the family. before he got involved in a wrestle with the chainsaw. She
The problems began just after 5.30pm yesterday when the denied he went after anyone with it.
Going to court can be expensive in terms of both money and time. reach an agreement. In contrast to a mediator, the conciliator may
There has been pressure to provide alternatives to court processes advise the parties, although he or she does not make a decision for
for solving legal disputes. It has been estimated that the average them. A conciliator may be a legal practitioner or professionally
civil case costs $30 000–$40 000, which puts many average wage qualified in the subject matter of the dispute. He or she will be
earners in a precarious position should they lose. Logically, any responsible for managing the process, explaining the rules and
claim against another party for less than this amount would seem acting as an umpire. In conciliation, the parties may also have their
useless, yet the financial cost of loss or damage below this amount own legal advisers.
Negotiation
alternative dispute resolution conciliation a form of alternative
Negotiation means discussion between two or more parties with dispute resolution processes, dispute resolution in which the
such as mediation, arbitration and disputing parties use the services
the aim of reaching a mutually beneficial outcome. It involves
conciliation, that do not involve of a conciliator, who takes an
consideration of the other party’s views, and often some degree of courts active role, advising the parties,
compromise. Many parents teach their children negotiating skills and suggesting alternatives and
encouraging the parties to reach
you’d probably be surprised at how often you negotiate with friends, agreement. The conciliator does
teachers and parents. In a legal sense, negotiation is frequently the negotiation any dialogue not make the decision for them
intended to resolve disputes and/
first stage of resolving a dispute between parties. Negotiation only
or produce an agreement on
involves the parties involved and therefore is usually low in cost. further courses of action
arbitration a form of alternative
dispute resolution in which the
Mediation and conciliation disputing parties present their
mediation a form of alternative cases before an arbitrator, who
Mediation and conciliation are similar processes and are usually dispute resolution designed to makes a decision that is binding
confidential. Both processes involve an independent and neutral help two (or more) parties, in the on the parties
presence of a neutral third party,
third party who helps the parties to negotiate and reach a decision
to reach an agreement
about their dispute that they both find acceptable.
Figure 7.5 Northern Beaches TAFE teachers protest about imposing work conditions proposed by the state government, 6 November 2008.
Trade unions
Groups of people in various industries unite to form trade unions
to protect their rights and conditions of employment. Unions can
help to negotiate a workplace agreement containing important
provisions about workplace safety, wages and conditions. They
will also take action when an employer proposes to change the
conditions of work in a way that is detrimental to employees.
In Australia, the legislative approach to industrial relations was
historically based on conciliation and arbitration. Going on strike is
a last resort.
In the early 1970s, one union, the Builders Labourers
Federation, banned workers from worksites so that various sites
of heritage value in Sydney were not demolished for the purpose
Figure 7.8 Maxine McKew, who won former Prime Minister Howard’s seat
of Bennelong in 2007 of potential property development. These ‘green bans’ were
Work’. The campaign included billboards, posters, television and Facebook and Twitter, and was actively involved in the fight
radio commercials to challenge the federal workplace relations against Woolworths and its ownership of poker machines in
laws, known at the time as WorkChoices. The ACTU created a Australia. GetUp! believes that there should be some sort of
website with information and updates on the campaign, and regulation regarding poker machines, to stop people from losing
asked supporters and union members to join. ‘Your Rights at Work’ large amounts of money.
continued to exist after the 2007 federal election. Although the new
government enacted new legislation, some people believe that Legal methods of challenging power
unions need to maintain pressure on any government to ensure
that workers’ rights are not eroded. Challenges to decisions of government or government bodies can
also be made on a formal or legal basis.
Review 7.4
Internal reviews
1 How would you go about challenging the state if they
In New South Wales, government departments can review their
refused to award you the Higher School Certificate?
What laws and means would you utilise to investigate own decisions, procedures or behaviour. Such reviews are very cost-
why you did not receive your HSC? effective, but can be ineffective in terms of practical outcomes if the
people conducting the review have been involved with a decision
2 Which of the informal methods of challenging state
power would be the most effective and why? that is not appropriate or incorrect.
A recent example is that of the Combined Pensioners and
3 Evaluate the effectiveness of informal methods of
Superannuants Association of NSW (CPSA). The organisation
challenging state power.
promotes the interests of pensioners and low-income retirees.
When a booking fee was introduced for country train fares in
2006, the CPSA applied to RailCorp, the state-owned passenger
rail system, to see documents related to community consultation.
The Minister for Transport claimed that there had been extensive
consultation and that it indicated ‘overwhelming community
support’ for the booking fee. Previously, pensioners were entitled
to four free rail trips per year.
The CPSA’s application was made under the Freedom of
Figure 7.9 ACTU union campaign, Your Rights at Work: a multimillion- Information Act 1989 (NSW), which has since been repealed and
dollar campaign to fight WorkChoices
replaced by the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009.
This legislation also gives the right to request changes to personal
Interest groups, including non-government records that are inaccurate, incomplete or out of date, and to
seek review of a decision not to grant access or to amend records.
organisations Other states and territories, and the Commonwealth, have similar
People can also form groups where they share political values freedom of information (FOI) legislation.
or aims, or have a specific goal of challenging a state decision. The application was denied, so the CPSA requested an internal
Individuals can join these groups and engage in activity of various review. The review found that there had been no community
types, or donate money to fund their activities. consultation about the booking fee.
Administrative and other tribunals conveyancers people who deal professionally with the legal and practical
matters involved in the transfer of titles to property when real estate is
Administrative and other quasi-judicial tribunals are bodies
sold and purchased
that review specific administrative decisions of government
agencies. They offer a time-efficient, low-cost means of resolving
Privacy bodies
legal disputes and problems. They are different from courts, as
they have narrow areas of jurisdiction, are less formal, usually All individuals have a right to privacy. Most people would agree that
do not allow legal representation and are not bound by rules it is not a pleasant feeling to know that somebody who is not close
of evidence and so can take into account a variety of factors in to you has access to information about you.
finding a solution. In a broad sense, laws have been enacted at both state and
Some examples of tribunals in NSW are the NSW Consumer, federal level to prevent information about you from being released
Trader and Tenancy Tribunal, which deals with disputes between to companies, government departments or other citizens. The
consumers and businesses, and the NSW Administrative Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) gives you the right to make a complaint if you
Decisions Tribunal, which hears cases involving allegations think personal information about you, including health information,
of discrimination and professional misconduct, and reviews has been mishandled by a Commonwealth government agency or
administrative decisions of NSW government bodies. For a private sector organisation. There are legal responsibilities that
example, the Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal’s role is government departments must carry out in the collection and
to resolve disputes between tenants, landlords, traders and storage of personal information of individuals.
consumers in a timely and effective manner. For example, if you have been convicted of a criminal offence,
The Administrative Decisions Tribunal has six divisions and an there are limits on how long information about this can be used.
appeal panel. The divisions will conduct reviews of decisions by The Criminal Records Act 1991 (NSW) provides that after a person has
government agencies in the following categories: been crime-free for a certain amount of time, most minor offences are
➥ the community services sector, including child care and treated as ‘spent’ convictions. Once a conviction is spent, the person
disability services does not have to disclose it to prospective employers, insurance
➥ decisions of the Chief Commissioner of State Revenue, many agents, banks, and so on. Unauthorised release of information about
having to do with state taxation a person’s spent conviction is subject to penalties.
➥ professional conduct of legal practitioners and property At the state level in NSW, the chief Acts protecting privacy are
conveyancers the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (NSW) and
➥ equal opportunity claims referred to the Tribunal by the Anti- the Health Records and Information Privacy Act 2002 (NSW). Persons
Discrimination Board who feel that their personal information has been misused may
➥ retail tenancy and ‘unconscionable conduct’ claims against either request an internal review or complain to Privacy NSW,
retail landlords established under the state privacy legislation to help people to
➥ decisions of government agencies under a wide variety of laws protect their privacy.
(the General Division).
The courts
The most frequent applications for review heard by the General
Division of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal have to do Law courts at both state and federal level have the power to review
with access to Government information applications, privacy, administrative decisions and actions. As discussed in Chapter 2,
and licensing matters relating to firearms, the security industry, the term ‘judicial review’ is used to describe a process whereby a
passenger transport and the building industry. court with the relevant jurisdiction can review a decision made by a
Vincent Morello
Sydney Morning Herald, 23 October 2012
Key terms/vocabulary
copyright digital dossier internet patents
Crimes Amendment (Computer Offences) Act 2001 (NSW) Spam Act 2003 (Cth)
Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)
Significant cases
Reno v American Civil Liberties Union, 521 US 844 (1997) United States of America v Ivanov, 175 F Supp 2d 367 (D Conn 2001)
Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Department of Internal Affairs v Atkinson and Others
Pty Ltd [2001] HCA 63 (High Court of New Zealand, 19 December 2008)
Odd law
Companies have to be very careful about the representations they make about their products. In a United States District Court
in California, a man initiated legal action against Apple Inc., because they ‘conveyed the misleading and deceptive message that
the iPhone 4S’s Siri feature, a so-called voice-activated assistant, performs useful functions and otherwise works as advertised’.
The plaintiff ’s experience was that when he ‘asked Siri for directions to a certain place, or to locate a store, Siri either did not
understand what Plaintiff was asking, or, after a very long wait time, responded with the wrong answer’.
Research 8.1
Follow the link at www.cambridge.edu.au/
prelegal3weblinks to the Internet World Stats website
and list the top ten countries with the highest internet
penetration rate.
C hap ter 8 Contemp orar y issue: The individual and tec hnol o g y 163
Areas of legal concern relating other Commonwealth Acts. It created offences pertaining to
to cyberspace computers, data and the internet, now contained in the Criminal
Code (Cth). As these are federal offences, there must be a
‘Commonwealth connecting factor’: for example, the computers
Even in cases where jurisdiction is clear, there are difficulties with
are owned or operated by the federal government, the data is
enforcement of the law in cyberspace. Criminal and civil wrongs
held by the federal government, or the offender’s actions are
in cyber
space can sometimes be classified into the familiar
carried out via a ‘telecommunications network’ – which includes
categories, but they may also take on new characteristics. Some
the internet.
of the areas of law concerning cyberspace are as follows.
A hacker may also be charged under state law. For example,
in 2001, a former employee of the company that installed a
Cybercrimes computerised sewerage system for Maroochy Shire Council,
Queensland hacked into the council’s computers and caused
Hacking
one million litres of raw sewage to run into public parks and
Hacking is unauthorised access to data held in a computer or creeks in the Sunshine Coast area. He was convicted on various
computer system, changing the data, interfering with electronic charges stemming from his breach of s 408D of the Criminal Code
communication between computers, or impairing the security, 1899 (Qld), which prohibits unauthorised use of identification
reliability or function of stored electronic data. A person may information for the purpose of committing an indictable offence.
engage in hacking out of curiosity, for monetary gain, to alter data The legislation is not specifically about computer hacking.
for some other reason, or to maliciously spread a virus. Hacking He appealed to the Queensland Supreme Court, where
also has the potential to be used in an act of terrorism. convictions on two of the charges were set aside but the sentence
The Cybercrime Act 2001 (Cth) amended the Criminal of two years’ imprisonment was not changed (R v Boden [2002]
Code (Cth), as well as the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) and several QCA 164).
Legal Links
For further information on internet fraud see the AFP
website (the link can be found at www.cambridge.edu.au/
prelegal3weblinks).
Figure 8.5 Hackers are criminals.
C hap ter 8 Contemp orar y issue: The individual and tec hnol o g y 165
Research 8.2
1 Go to the Scamwatch and Best Scams websites
(refer to www.cambridge.edu.au/prelegal3weblinks for
links) and find definitions for the scams listed below:
– Online auction and shopping scams
– Domain name renewal scams
– Spam (junk mail) offers
– Free offers on the internet
Figure 8.6 People can be betrayed by spam. Senders often elicit money – Modem jacking
from gullible victims. – Spyware and key-loggers
– Ringtone scams
Spam – Up-front payment scams.
Spam is junk mail received electronically. Some spam is harmless but 2 Make a list of the other types of internet scams.
Research 8.3 must have developed into something tangible – for example a
software program or an essay – to qualify for protection. Three
Go to the ACMA website (refer to www.cambridge.edu.au/ types of intellectual property rights are copyright, trademarks
prelegal3weblinks for link) and:
and patents.
££ find out how to make complaints about spam
££ outline various ways in which spam is being fought copyright an exclusive right to publish, copy, publicly perform, broadcast,
in Australia. or make an adaptation of certain forms of expression, namely sounds,
words or visual images
Legal Links trademarks words, names, symbols, devices or any combination of these,
used to identify and distinguish the goods or services of one company
from those of another
For further discussion of spam and what is being done
internationally to tackle it, links to additional websites are
available at www.cambridge.edu.au/prelegal3weblinks.
patents rights granted for any device, substance, method or process
To see the current Australian spam legislation, follow the which is new, inventive or useful
link at www.cambridge.edu.au/prelegal3weblinks to the
ComLaw site and enter ‘Spam Act 2003’ into the Quick
Search field.
Research 8.4
Go to the website of the World Intellectual Property
Organization (WIPO) (refer to www.cambridge.edu.au/
Refer to Chapter 8 on the Cambridge GO website prelegal3weblinks for link).
for information relating to Department of Internal
1 Locate WIPO’s definition of intellectual property.
Affairs v Atkinson and Others (High Court of New
2 Make a list of the treaties regarding intellectual
Zealand, 19 December 2008).
property.
C hap ter 8 Contemp orar y issue: The individual and tec hnol o g y 167
Figure 8.9 Trademarks of major companies make them readily identifiable
Figure 8.8 WIPO Headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland (Twitter marks are a trademark of Twitter, Inc.).
it is registered. A trademark distinguishes a person’s or company’s the specific nature of intellectual property rights, in
contrast to other kinds of property.
product from all others’ products. Some registered trademarks
For further information on trademarks and patents, follow call this feeling of invincibility the ‘disinhibition effect’.
the links at www.cambridge.edu.au/prelegal3weblinks. Social networking sites such as Twitter and Facebook and
online communication media such as chat rooms require varying
C hap ter 8 Contemp orar y issue: The individual and tec hnol o g y 169
Figure 8.11 In late 2008, there were calls to toughen laws in Australia on
disinhibition effect the tendency to say and do things in cyberspace that
cyber-racism that was occurring, particularly on social networking sites.
the person would not ordinarily say or do in the face-to-face world
Research 8.5
online predators people with malicious intent, such as sex offenders,
paedophiles, who give false and misleading identities with the aim of Research the laws involving cyber-racism in Australia and
enticing their victims into harmful encounters online or in real life
evaluate their effectiveness.
Start with the Cyber-Racism section on the Australian
Human Rights Commission website (refer to www.
racial hatred abuse or denigration of a person because of his or her race,
or verbal abuse or denigration of a race generally
cambridge.edu.au/prelegal3weblinks for link).
The information that we present about ourselves online, including citizens’ personal information such as social security, health
photographs, forms our ‘digital dossier’. This ‘digital dossier’ insurance and taxation. Amendments to the Act in 2000 extended
comprises all the information about a person, which is held in the privacy regime to parts of the private sector, relating to
how businesses should collect, store, use and disclose personal
about individuals, but now the speed of data collection practices also enacted privacy legislation; others have privacy schemes for
has outpaced methods of protecting that data. government agencies based on the privacy principles contained in
There has been a trend towards the use of services and storage of the federal Act.
files, documents, email and other personal information online, in the There is currently no statutory tort for breach of privacy.
‘the cloud’, on sites that the user does not own or control; also, the However, in Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game
user need not have knowledge of or expertise in their creation or Meats Pty Ltd [2001] HCA 63, the High Court held that there was
maintenance. Individuals have little control over how the most nothing standing in the way of developing one. Since then, there
powerful search engines use their information. Information, stories, have been several cases heard in state courts that point towards the
photos and anything else you may post on a website may be recognition of such a tort.
removed later, but they have already been recorded in an internet In 2008, the Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC)
archive, as well as in a search engine ‘cache’ – a ‘snapshot’ that is published a report titled For Your Information: Australian Privacy
taken of the page as it originally appeared. Other people may also Law and Practice, in which it recommended extensive changes to
copy your words or photos and post them on their own websites or privacy laws and practices to take account of new technology, as
web pages. So your information acts like a ‘digital tattoo’: even when well as a way that individuals can bring a civil action for serious
it’s no longer wanted for display, it is not easily removed. breach of privacy. Although the federal Privacy Act is only 20 years
old, it was introduced before the advent of super computers,
the internet, mobile phones, digital cameras, e
commerce,
sophisticated surveillance devices and social networking websites
– all of which challenge our capacity to safeguard our sensitive
personal information. The Privacy Act has worked pretty well to
date, but it now needs a host of refinements to help us navigate
the Information Superhighway. These days, information privacy
touches almost every aspect of our daily lives, including our medical
records and health status, our finances and creditworthiness, the
personal details collected and stored on a multiplicity of public
and corporate databases, and even the ability to control the
display and distribution of our own images. In 2012, the federal
government passed the Cybercrime Legislation Amendment Act 2012
(Cth) to tighten up privacy rules by giving people more information
about the use of their personal details in cyberspace. However,
critics wonder whether this is enough and are concerned about
government moves to store the browsing history of everyone
in Australia.
digital dossier all the types of information about a person that he or she
has deliberately or unintentionally put onto the internet, held in multiple
Figure 8.12 Cloud computing is revolutionising cyberspace while locations
increasing security concerns.
C hap ter 8 Contemp orar y issue: The individual and tec hnol o g y 171
Legal Links
For further information on digital safety issues, see the
Australian government’s Cybersmart website (refer to
www.cambridge.edu.au/prelegal3weblinks for link).
Figure 8.14 Does digital security exist?
A clean feed?
World Wide Web a system of documents that are accessible on the
Similar concerns about offensive and obscene content have been internet and that are connected to each other through hyperlinks the user
can click on to be taken to another location. The World Wide Web is not
raised in Australia more recently. The idea of ‘clean feed’ legislation the same thing as the internet.
originated during the Howard federal government and involved the
establishment of a filtering scheme that would be imposed on all
Internet Service Providers (ISPs).
C hap ter 8 Contemp orar y issue: The individual and tec hnol o g y 173
2 Discuss Barlow’s assertion that governments should the marketplace of ideas. They advocate a more active role for
keep out of cyberspace. governments in regulating quality on the internet. This approach
would involve:
££ enacting legislation and or international treaties
££ imposing obligations on ISPs to block certain content
8.4 Rights in cyberspace ££ strengthening enforcement agencies.
The Australian government took a more interventionist approach in
Laissez-faire approach to rights the debate about ‘clean feed’ regulation.
Other means of dealing with questionable material in
Some internet commentators advocate a laissez-faire approach to cyberspace have been suggested. Many of these methods
information, which means they do not think it should be regulated of improving the quality of information rely on the active
in any way. They argue that individuals are capable of determining involvement of online communities and of key actors and
the quality of internet content and that governments should not stakeholders, both private and public. These include not only
intervene in the ‘marketplace of ideas’. One of the organisations governments, law-makers, and law enforcement agencies, but
taking this line is the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which was also parents, teachers, software companies and other businesses.
founded in 1990 with the primary goals of defending free speech, Governments would need to take a leadership role, but would
privacy, and consumer rights. also need to give the other agents considerable freedom and
Court decisions
Review 8.5 Superior courts can create precedents in relation to the legalities
of activities in cyberspace. As we saw, the US Supreme Court’s
1 How is the debate about government regulation of decision in Reno v ACLU that the indecency provisions in the
internet content in the US different from the form that
Communications Decency Act of 1996 were unconstitutional
it takes in Australia? How is it similar?
restrictions on free speech resulted in those statutory provisions
2 Do you think Reno v ACLU would be decided in the same being struck down. Although courts in one country are not bound
way today? Give reasons for your answer. How likely
by decisions in another country (that is, foreign decisions cannot
is it that an internet user might encounter content ‘by
serve as precedent), judges sometimes refer to cases from other
accident’? Give examples.
countries in their decisions.
3 What were the positions of the two sides in the ‘clean
feed’ debate?
International
4 Outline at least one argument for each side in the
philosophical debate about how governments should
Unlike other areas of law where issues cross national boundaries,
approach individual rights regarding internet content.
there are few specific international treaties that deal specifically
Be sure to provide reasons (evidence) for the claims that
with cyberspace. Given the exponential rise in internet use since the
each side might make.
1990s, one would expect that there would be many international
5 Think of at least one objection to the argument for each
treaties to deal with common issues faced by all states. This is yet
side’s view. Which view is the more plausible? Justify
to occur, however.
your answer.
Some international organisations and their current roles with
respect to governance in cyberspace are listed below.
££ United Nations: The UN has little control over the internet or
what happens in cyberspace, except in the area of intellectual
C hap ter 8 Contemp orar y issue: The individual and tec hnol o g y 175
One way in which governments can exert control over content is by new technology against the law-breakers. It can be quite costly
enlisting local intermediaries such as ISPs and the companies that for governments to chase and shut down illegal operations in
control the physical internet connections. They can also influence cyberspace. Also, only developed (first world) countries have the
the policy of what goes on the local portals for search engines. By financial and other resources to do this.
utilising financial intermediaries, such as PayPal, banks or credit Another major difficulty for governments seeking to control
card companies, a government can wield huge influence over an content is the risk of censorship. As we have seen, this is of
industry – indeed, it can cripple it without going to court. particular concern to countries with explicit protection for freedom
Needless to say, some countries that have utilised these methods of expression. On the other hand, countries that have no qualms
are not known for having a high regard for freedom of expression or about limiting free speech, such as China and Saudi Arabia, have
for corporate independence from government. achieved unprecedented control over internet content within their
jurisdictions.
As there are many different legislative regimes in the world,
Prosecution of individual criminals
what is illegal in one country may be permitted in another. In the
Quite often the simplest way a government can assert control absence of effective international conventions to deal with content
over cyberspace is by physically arresting an individual suspected that has human rights implications, such as child pornography,
of cybercrime. The difficulty is that the person must be within the some nations have implemented measures such as ISP filtering.
territorial borders of the government that is seeking him or her.
Otherwise, extradition treaties can be used to remove the person
from the country where he or she has taken refuge.
Review 8.6
1 Why are strategies involving the use of intermediaries
extradition the handing over of a person accused of a crime by the
authorities of the country where he or she has taken refuge, to the
(such as ISPs, companies that provide physical
authorities of the country where the crime was committed infrastructure, and banks) problematic? List some of the
objections that could be made to these strategies.
2 Name three problems for governments seeking to make
Research 8.7 certain types of web content illegal.
4 What are the types of objectionable material that enormously damaging. Companies also tend to under-report
they target? the effects of cybercrime on their business because they do
not want the adverse publicity.
C hap ter 8 Contemp orar y issue: The individual and tec hnol o g y 177
Figure 8.16 The laws that govern cybercrime have to constantly evolve in order to match the speed and growth of cyberspace.
C hap ter 8 Contemp orar y issue: The individual and tec hnol o g y 179
Multiple-choice questions
1 Two distinct features of cyberspace that will influence laws 4 Spam is:
relating to it are its: a the unauthorised duplication of goods protected by
a security and predictability intellectual property law
b anonymity and global character b an unsolicited commercial electronic message
c political progressivism and educational value c an attempt to gain money through some sort of deception
d democracy and communitarianism d the intentional misrepresentation or concealment of
2 It can be concluded from the US Supreme Court decision in information in order to deceive or mislead
Reno v ACLU that: 5 A digital tattoo is:
a Cyberspace requires some degree of government control. a a unique type of computer identifier used by some
b Laws that attempt to regulate internet content may restrict European countries
free speech. b a software program unique to the individual, which is
c Online communication is more like a conference call than a stored online somewhere in cyberspace
private conversation. c a type of internet scam
d All of the above. d information placed on the internet that is no longer wanted
3 The international organisation concerned with copyright law is: but that cannot be easily removed
a ICANN
b IANA
c the UN
d WIPO
3 List the various types of intellectual property and explain how 8 Explain why government control of cyberspace is constantly
cyberspace may pose unique problems for the law in relation challenged.
to them. 9 List the international organisations that have some authority
4 Describe the various ways in which privacy can be violated in for the regulation of cyberspace, and describe the function and
cyberspace. jurisdiction of each.
5 Explain how privacy is protected in Australia. 10 Outline the reasons why law is not always effective in
cyberspace.
6 List some of the problems arising from the free and
unrestricted transmission of information in cyberspace.
Topic review
Extended response
1 Evaluate the role of case law in shaping the regulation of the 4 Evaluate the usefulness of international treaties in governing
internet. Refer to two prominent cases in your answer. cyberspace.
2 Describe the features of the internet and explain the 5 Assess the effectiveness of government efforts to fight crime in
implications of these features on law-making in cyberspace. cyberspace.
3 ‘In our world, whatever the human mind may create can be
reproduced and distributed infinitely at no cost.’ Assess the
implications of this aspect of John Perry Barlow’s 1992 vision of
cyberspace.
C hap ter 8 Contemp orar y issue: The individual and tec hnol o g y 181
Principal focus
Through examining current issues and examples, students will gain an understanding of the practical
operation of the law.
Chapter 9
Children and young people
Chapter objectives
In this chapter, students will:
➔ explore legal concepts and terminology relating to children ➔ investigate the place of the law in encouraging cooperation
and young people and resolving conflict with regard to children and young
➔ investigate the main features of the Australian and people
international legal systems in relation to children and ➔ investigate the role of the law in addressing and responding
young people to change with respect to children and young people
➔ analyse the legal system’s effectiveness in delivering justice ➔ find and use legal information from a range of sources
and addressing issues in society relating to children and ➔ develop the ability to effectively communicate legal
young people information and issues.
Key terms/vocabulary
adoption order indictable offence tort
Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 (NSW) Children (Protection and Parental Responsibility) Act 1997 (NSW)
Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration Act 1995 (NSW) Commission for Children and Young People Act 1998 (NSW)
Australian Citizenship Act 2007 (Cth) Children’s Court Act 1987 (NSW)
Significant cases
Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Health Authority [1985] 3 Re W (A Minor) [1993] Fam 64
All ER 402
9.2 Children, young people Figure 9.1 Under the law, a person aged 15 or younger is generally
and the law regarded as a ‘child’. In NSW, a person between the ages of 16 and 18 is
considered a ‘young person’.
Leaving home
Discrimination Young people do not have the right to leave their parents’ home
Children and young people are protected from discrimination before the age of 18. However, the law would not normally force
on the basis of age by Part 4G of the Anti-Discrimination Act young people over the age of 16 to stay at home against their
1977 (NSW). This Act also outlaws discrimination on the basis wishes. The following factors would be considered: maturity,
of sex, race, sexuality and other characteristics, and applies to accommodation, safe living environment, and the parents’ attitude.
under 18 years are generally not bound by a contract, lease or other ➥ family matters, including inheritance and parentage
transaction (ss 8, 17). The courts will not enforce such contracts, ➥ care and control
even if they do exist. ➥ Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act
The exception to this, contained in s 19 of the Act, is a situation 1998 (NSW)
where a young person enters an agreement that is for his or her
own benefit and is a necessity, such as accommodation or food.
For example, a young person who leaves home at age 17 to take an
apprenticeship and has to sign a rental lease for accommodation,
Review 9.2
or needs to buy a car on finance for transport, will be bound by the 1 How does a child become an Australian citizen?
contract. 2 List a child’s or young person’s legal rights and
Some minors may be able to enter into certain contractual responsibilities in each of the following areas, along
arrangements if they have a parent or guardian who acts as a with the statutory or common law source of each of the
guarantor to ensure that the contractual obligations are fulfilled. rights and obligations:
The Supreme Court of NSW can confer the capacity to enter a a education
legal contract upon a minor (s 26). b work
c medical treatment
Torts d entering a contract.
The Young Offenders Act 1997 (NSW) cautions formal notices given to young offenders where the offence is
more serious than one appropriately dealt with by a warning
The Young Offenders Act 1997 (NSW) has the aim of providing
diversionary measures for young offenders as alternatives to court
appearances. The Act only applies to summary offences and to Youth Justice Conferences a measure to divert young offenders from
those indictable offences that can be dealt with summarily. The the court system through a conference that addresses the offender’s
behaviour in a more holistic manner
principles of the Act are that:
A youth justice conference may be used for offences of the same The role of parliament and the courts
gravity as those for which a caution is imposed, or one that is more
Federal and state parliaments have passed numerous Acts that
serious, such as those involving harm to a victim. Conferences are
protect children and young people by restricting their activities
designed to encourage the offender to take responsibility for his or
and by placing responsibilities on adults to ensure the welfare
her own actions, to provide support services, to promote the rights
of children and young people. Certain rights of children have
of victims, and to involve families and others in the justice process.
also been enshrined in legislation, which in turn has created
Legal Links legal institutions and processes that promote and protect
these rights. The courts have also played a role, through cases
Go to the NSW Police Force website (refer to www.cambridge. that have affirmed the current law or changed the law through
edu.au/prelegal3weblinks for link) for more information on reinterpretation.
warnings, cautions and youth justice conferences.
Some of the legal institutions in NSW that have been set up to
protect children and young people are as follows.
outlined in the Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act
1998 (NSW). The Commission for Children and Young People Act 1998 Review 9.3
(NSW) contains offences with penalties for employers who employ
1 Outline the main role of the NSW Commission for
a person in child-related employment without sufficient scrutiny Children and Young People.
of the person, or who knowingly employ a prohibited person
2 Describe what is meant by the ‘working with
in child-related employment. These requirements on employers children check’.
reduce the likelihood of prohibited persons having contact with
children in the course of their work.
The commission also makes submissions to government or Law Children’s Courts
Reform Commission reviews of legislation that affect children and Across NSW, there are 13 children’s magistrates sitting in seven
young people. An example of this is its submission to the Review of specialist Children’s Courts. Five of these courts are in metropolitan
the Young Offenders Act 1997 and the Children (Criminal Proceedings) areas. There are also five children’s registrars appointed under the
Act 1987 in December 2011. Some of these findings are discussed in Children’s Court Act 1987 (NSW) to assist in the administration of
this chapter. matters before the court. The court has a dual role: determining
matters of juvenile offenders that appear before it, and determining
‘working with children check’ a check by the NSW Commission for
care and protection matters concerning children on application to
Children and Young People on the appropriateness of a person in NSW to
work in child-related employment it by Department of Family and Community Services (Community
Services NSW).
Under the Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection)
prohibited person a person prohibited from working in child-related Act 1998 (NSW) ss 71 and 72, the court may make care orders if it
employment because of a conviction of a serious sex offence, murder of a
is satisfied on the balance of probabilities that the child or young
child, or an offence involving violence towards a child
person is in need of care or protection.
Community Services NSW is responsible for the care and protection As discussed in Chapter 7, the Administrative Decisions Tribunal
of children in NSW. It carries out this role in cooperation with non- reviews administrative decisions of NSW government bodies.
government organisations and government agencies. Its activities Its Community Services Division deals with applications for review
include the provision of accommodation and support for children of decisions made by DOCS. The division also hears applications
and young people who need to live away from their families, the for declarations that a person seeking to apply for a job working
regulation of child care through licensing, and the funding and with children is not a prohibited person under the Commission for
regulation of adoption services. Children and Young People Act 1998 (NSW).
Legal Aid NSW provides a range of services to children and young In 2009 the Council of Australian Governments (COAG), an
people in NSW. It represents children and young people in a variety intergovernmental forum made up of the federal and all state
of matters, from welfare proceedings in the Children’s Court to and territory governments, published its National Framework for
family law matters in the Family Court. Its legal representatives will Protecting Australia’s Children 2009–2020. This initiative has the aim
also appear for children and young people facing criminal charges of fighting child abuse and neglect by preventing it in the first place
in the Children’s Court. – that is, by protecting the safety and wellbeing of children.
Legal Links
The Worksite for Schools website (refer to www.cambridge.
Research 9.3
edu.au/prelegal3weblinks for link) provides fact sheets, Use the following websites to research the roles of these
case studies, job profiles and other information about work, institutions and organisations in protecting the interests of
specifically directed to young people. children and young people. Prepare a fact sheet on two of
your choosing.
➥ Committee on the Rights of the Child
➥ The NSW Commission for Children and Young People
➥ The NSW Children’s Court
➥ Community Services (formerly Department of
Community Services)
➥ Legal Aid NSW
➥ The NSW Ombudsman
➥ The Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU)
Refer to www.cambridge.edu.au/prelegal3weblinks for links
to these websites.
9.4 Responsiveness of
the law
As they grow through adolescence and into adulthood, young
people are more likely to take risks. At the same time there are
adults in society who abuse and exploit children and young people.
This means that children and young people will sometimes be at
risk of harm, or at risk of harming others. It is in this light that the
legislation and mechanisms in place to ensure justice for children
and young people will be evaluated.
Figure 9.7 The ACTU provides information for children and young people If children and young people come into contact with the criminal
entering the workforce. justice system, it is usually through interaction with a police officer
Youth conferencing development of the adolescent brain until the age of 25. It has
suggested that our understanding of the meaning of criminal
While youth conferencing generally deals with matters that
responsibility for children and young people may need to
would be dealt with summarily, it can, under the Young Offenders
be reassessed.
Act 1997 (NSW), be used for some indictable offences such as
➥ The report also goes on to say, ‘the attempt to combine the so
robbery and aggravated break, enter and steal. One of the
called “justice” and “welfare” models of juvenile justice in the
criticisms of well-intentioned laws like the Young Offenders Act
legislation has created a complex and sometimes contradictory
is that they are not being used for a sufficiently wide range of
amalgam of community based sanctions and controls alongside
offences, and therefore that some young offenders are missing
formal court processes and detention. It is possible that this
out on the benefits that conferencing offers. The Shopfront
has led to “net widening”, as police warn, caution or refer to
Youth Legal Centre, in its submission in response to the NSW
conferencing children who might otherwise have been dealt
Law Reform Commission paper on sentencing young offenders
with informally.’
in 2003, argued that:
➥ Lastly, it argues that the principles of restorative justice that
Youth justice conferencing is suitable for a wide range of offences, underpin youth justice conferencing are contentious and there
even very serious ones. It is not a ‘soft option’. Indeed, it could be
is insufficient evidence for the effectiveness of youth justice
said that conferencing works best in the case of relatively serious
offences because the young offender is obliged to consider the conferencing in its current form in reducing recidivism. This
consequences of his or her actions, in particular the harm caused supports the view expressed by Dr Weatherburn.
to the victim. In most cases, conferencing is a more effective
mechanism than court for achieving this.
A further criticism of the application of the provisions of Refer to Chapter 9 on the Cambridge GO website
the Young Offenders Act from recent findings suggests that for information relating to:
conferencing needs to be supported by additional rehabilitative ➥ Care and protection of children and young people
measures. According to the Director of the NSW Bureau of Crime ➥ Children and young people in the workplace.
The Joint Standing Committee on Treaties was established to website (refer to www.cambridge.edu.au/prelegal3weblinks
for link) and that website’s search function to get started.
inquire into and report on matters arising from treaties, proposed
treaty actions, any questions relating to a treaty referred to it
by either house of parliament or a minister, and other matters
referred to it by the Minister for Foreign Affairs. For example, in 9.5 Conclusion
1998 its Report 17 looked at domestic ramifications of ratification;
federal, state and territory progress in complying with CROC; the The rights of children have come a long way. Australian legislation
adequacy of programs and services for children’s health, education has established processes and institutions to recognise and protect
and welfare; the adequacy of legislation in addressing the needs the important role that children and young people play in our
of children; and further action required. Nonetheless, some have society. It is accepted that these individuals have special needs
argued that the development of a process for scrutiny of draft because of their age, and that their physical, intellectual, emotional
legislation for compliance with treaty principles should be a and social development depends on legal and social mechanisms
high priority. to allow them to flourish.
Other deficiencies in Australian law regarding CROC include: There is still cause for great concern about the exploitation and
➥ The defence of ‘lawful correction’ is still available in all states abuse of children internationally. The force of international law
and territories to parents who use corporal punishment on relies on the domestic measures taken to implement the rights
their children, except in NSW, where it has been limited by contained in treaties such as CROC, and the pressure brought to
legislation prohibiting force to the head or neck, and force bear by the parties, not only by the treaty-based human rights
causing harm ‘likely to last for more than a short period’. committees.
Figure 9.9 Many products sold throughout the world are still made using forced child labour.
Multiple-choice questions
1 Which of the following is a feature of doli incapax in NSW? 3 Which of the following is not a reason for the law to treat
a Children and young people are responsible for their crimes children and young people differently?
from the age of 14. a to prevent them from being exploited
b There are certain crimes for which children and young b to protect them from the consequences of making
people are not responsible. uninformed decisions
c Children and young people under the age of 10 are not c to give them the best chance of finding appropriate
responsible for their crimes. employment
d People with mental disabilities are not responsible for d to protect others from being disadvantaged by dealing
their crimes. with a person who is a minor
2 Which of the following is the best definition for ‘young person’?
a a person under the age of 16
b a person between the ages of 12 and 16
c a person aged between 16 and 18
d a person aged between 18 and 25
2 In three paragraphs, define child abuse and explain some of the 6 Outline the roles of the NSW Commission for Children and
issues in relation to it. Young People.
3 Provide examples of contexts where the criminal justice system 7 What challenges might confront Community Services NSW in
treats children and young people differently from adults. performing its role effectively?
4 Explain how the Young Offenders Act 1997 (NSW) is unique and 8 Identify at least two non-legal mechanisms that promote the
outline some of the recent criticisms made of the Act. rights of children and young people.
Topic review
Extended response
Critically evaluate how the legal system responds to the issue of
juvenile justice. Refer to strategies for crime prevention, issues
Marking criteria for the extended response
surrounding arrest and detention, diversionary schemes and court questions can be found on the Cambridge GO
proceedings for young people. website. Refer to these criteria when planning and
writing your responses.
Chapter 10
Women
Chapter objectives
In this chapter, students will:
➔ explore legal concepts and terminology with respect ➔ investigate the place of the law in encouraging cooperation
to women and resolving conflict with regard to women and the law
➔ investigate the main features of the Australian and ➔ investigate the role of the law in addressing and responding
international legal systems with respect to women to change with respect to women
➔ analyse the effectiveness of the legal system to deliver ➔ find and use legal information from a range of sources
justice and adequately address issues in society relating ➔ develop the ability to effectively communicate legal
to women information and issues
Key terms/vocabulary
direct discrimination glass ceiling optional protocol
Significant cases
O’Callaghan v Loder [1984] EOC 92-023
10.2 Women and the law such as rearing children, preparing food, sewing and various other
tasks in the home.
This position was strongly influenced by biology. As most women
At both federal and state levels, there is a substantial body of
were always bearing children (no reliable and safe contraception
legislation and policy specifically relating to the rights of women. In
was available), they were left at home, dependent on their male
this unit of study, the changing status of women in Australia today
partners.
will be examined, as well as the legal and non-legal mechanisms for
Views of women’s essential nature extended to various aspects
achieving equality (primarily in the workplace). The unit will also
of social life, and sometimes attempts were made to explain or
include an evaluation of the effectiveness of these responses.
justify these views. Much was written and said by men about
Other issues relevant to the rights of women in Australia today
women, especially in Victorian England, from reasons as to why
will be covered in the HSC course in the unit on family law.
they belong in the home bearing children to analysis of their sexual
desires.
There have been signature times throughout the last 120 years
where women’s restricted roles were more prominently challenged.
The two World Wars saw women, through necessity, take on non-
traditional roles due to the shortage of men on the home front.
This was especially so during the Second World War. Women ran
farms, worked in factories, and generally maintained productivity
at home. Although this work was at times hard and challenging,
it was also liberating for many women, because for the first time
they understood their full potential outside the traditional roles
assigned to them in society. Women also began to question
why many areas of employment were denied to them, and more
importantly, why they did not receive equal pay. In 1943, an
Australian Women’s Conference for Victory in War and Victory in
Peace was held in Sydney. The participants drew up a program of
reforms for the government to incorporate into postwar Australia.
This document, the Australian Women’s Charter, contained 23
objectives such as the establishment of a national network of child
care centres, and equal pay. It is considered a ‘landmark manifesto’
of Australian feminism.
For many women, though, the end of the war meant room
had to be made for the returning soldiers, and they resumed their
Figure 10.1 Historically, women’s role was that of homemaker. domestic roles as wives, mothers and homemakers.
feminism the advocacy of rights for women on the basis of the equality of
men and women; there are many varieties of feminist ideas in political and
Review 10.1
1 Describe the social attitudes about women prior to the
20th century and give some reasons why these attitudes
permeated society.
2 Prepare a detailed timeline to outline the historical
development of the roles of women in society.
Table 10.2 Apparent Retention Rate For Full-Time School Students, Year 7/8 to Year 12
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Males % 68.1 69.8 70.3 70.4 69.9 69.0 68.8 68.9 70.8 73.2
Females % 79.1 80.7 80.7 81.4 81.0 80.7 80.1 80.5 81.4 83.0
Table 10.3 Apprenticeships and traineeships in-training by occupation group and gender, 2009
Occupation Women Men Total
Managers and administrators 1060 2250 3300
Professionals 1950 2860 4810
Associate professionals 16 190 15 140 31 330
Tradespersons and related workers 22 620 169 840 192 460
Advanced clerical and service workers 4990 1880 6870
Intermediate clerical, sales and service workers 64 710 27 500 92 210
Intermediate production and transport workers 5160 33 410 38 560
Elementary clerical, sales and service workers 12 850 7260 20 110
Labourers and related workers 7330 17 400 24 730
Total 136 850 277 540 414 390
Source: National Centre for Vocational Education Research, 2009
Women enrolled in higher education comprised 55 per cent of and trainees in the Tradespersons and related workers group
enrolments in 2010. However, women have been under-represented were men, whereas most new apprentices and trainees in the
in trade apprenticeships in Australia and are substantially under- Intermediate clerical, sales and service workers were women.
represented in the manual trades in Australia, with the number of
women in manual trades being less than 2 per cent in 2011. This
seems consistent with the level of occupational segregation seen
in NSW and throughout Australia today, especially in the trades.
Occupational segregation will be examined later. With respect to
labour force participation, women have made significant gains over
the past 30 years to 2009, with participation rising from 43.5 per cent
to 58.7 per cent. Across Australia, women still constitute the majority
of part-time and casual workers, and workers in these categories
often lack job security and other benefits available to those in full
time employment, such as parental leave and holiday pay. These
and other issues, such as pay equity and women in leadership roles,
will be discussed later.
Large proportions of all new apprenticeships and traineeships
for the 12 months to June 2009 were in the occupational groups
Intermediate clerical, sales and service workers and Tradespersons Figure 10.3 Women have been, and continue to be, under-represented
and related workers (see Table 10.3). Most of the new apprentices in trade apprenticeships in NSW.
Figure 10.5 Today, compared to non-Indigenous women, Indigenous women fall behind on most indicators of health and wellbeing.
70%
against women continues to exist around the world. The treaty
states that this discrimination:
60%
is an obstacle to the growth of the prosperity of society and
50% the family and makes more difficult the full development of the
potentialities of women in the service of their countries and of
40% humanity.
30%
opened for signature (of a entered into force (of a
20% treaty) having negotiations treaty) having become binding
concluded and ready for parties’ upon those states which have
10% signatures. Many treaties, consented to be bound by it
especially those convened by the
0% UN, will be open for signature
Indigenous Non-Indigenous Indigenous Non-Indigenous only until a certain date; others,
males males females females such as the Geneva Conventions, state a politically independent
Figure 10.6 Comparison of estimated Indigenous and non-Indigenous are open for signature indefinitely country
labour force participation rates (15–64 years of age) as at 2009
Figure 10.7 More women than men interrupt their working lives for a period of time when they have children.
can make a complaint to the Anti-Discrimination Board, which right to equitable access to jobs, career paths, training and staff
will investigate the complaint and try to help the parties to development and equitable conditions of employment.
reach a solution. If the board cannot resolve a complaint, In essence, equal opportunity is about:
women can take their case to the Equal Opportunity Division ££ treating people with dignity and respect
of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal, established under the ££ unbiased management decisions
Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 (NSW), which can make ££ ensuring equal access in all areas of employment including
Complainants generally must make their complaint within access to information, supervision and management of staff
12 months of the alleged incident and it must be in writing. and conditions of employment, with all selection based on
Fair Work Australia is another authority that addresses merit (the best person for the job)
discrimination in the workplace affecting all workers, including ££ recognition and respect for the social and cultural backgrounds
2 Explain why indirect discrimination is difficult to is a higher education institution, a private sector company, a non-
establish and then prove. profit or community organisation, a private school or a union must
3 Outline the objectives of the Sex Discrimination Act develop and implement such a workplace program.
1984 (Cth). The Act’s objectives reflect the idea that in a just and fair world
there should be an equitable spread of both sexes in management
4 Define what is meant by ‘sexual harassment’. What
needs to occur before a complaint of sexual harassment and support jobs across all industries. At present this is not case. It
can be initiated? is also hoped that equal opportunity will provide much-needed role
models in managerial positions so that younger women will aspire to
these positions. As well, no woman can be considered for a particular
Table 10.4 Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) – complaints
job for which she is not suitably qualified. The Act is not about putting
received by ground, 2010–11
women in jobs ahead of men: s 2A(a) clearly states that one of its
Sex Discrimination Act Total % objects is ‘to promote the principle that employment for women
Sex discrimination 449 45 should be dealt with on the basis of merit’. This means that matters
such as selection and promotion of employees should be based solely
Marital status 30 3
on their qualifications, experience and ability to do the job.
Pregnancy 170 17
The Act also establishes the Equal Opportunity for Women in the
Sexual harassment 186 19 Workplace Agency to oversee the implementation of the Act.
Victimisation 118 12
Government agencies
Aids, permits, instructs 3 – There are agencies at both federal and state levels that provide
policy advice on women’s issues. The federal Office for Women
Total 995 100
(OfW) is part of the Department of Families, Housing, Community
Source: Australian Human Rights Commission, Annual Report 2010–2011 Services and Indigenous Affairs. Its primary role is to provide policy
Figure 10.8 Some companies provide mentoring for high-achieving university graduates.
1 Explain the role of the Office for Women and the Office major unions in Australia compared to their level of union
for Women’s Policy. membership.
2 List and discuss some issues that might be raised by Most recently, the ACTU has campaigned for paid maternity
these offices in the development of law and policy leave, which it believes is a fundamental human right and a
relating to: necessary measure to address the discrimination and disadvantage
££ requirements for businesses regarding conditions suffered by women who choose to be parents. At least 157 countries
of employment have some form of paid leave, and of the 30 member states of the
££ budget provisions regarding the funding of
health care
££ programs in which business leaders provide
mentoring for high-achieving university graduates.
Figure 10.9 The ACTU has in recent times campaigned strongly for better
rights for women in the workplace.
Non-legal responses
Legal mechanisms have been put in place to overcome the historical
and cultural barriers that women still face. There are also some very
effective informal measures that keep the issues of women on the
political agenda.
Men
12.7 hrs
Research 10.3
1 Visit the web page titled ‘engaging with women’s organisations’ on the Office for Women website (refer to www.cambridge.edu.
au/prelegal3weblinks for link) and research two national women’s organisations. Outline the main issues with which they are
concerned, and their objectives.
2 Visit the WEL homepage (refer to www.cambridge.edu.au/prelegal3weblinks for link) and research two policy positions of WEL.
Write a one-page report on what you discover.
Effectiveness of international are also four times more likely to be infected with HIV/AIDS than
responses men, and up to 130 million women die from this disease each year.
Education about the spread of AIDS and programs that address
specific health issues relating to women are not adequate in many
Women around the world are exploited and abused as a result of
poorer countries.
their unequal position under the laws of their countries. The UN
At the same time, 179 countries have ratified CEDAW and have
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against
passed laws consistent with the treaty. Millions more girls now
Women (CEDAW) was a significant step forward in highlighting
receive a primary school education and millions of women have
the issues and getting states to commit to ending discrimination
been able to take out loans or now have the right to own or inherit
against women.
property in their own right. The issues listed above are now well
gender segregation the separation of people according to their gender established on the global agenda, whereas prior to CEDAW they
were isolated issues in different countries, the extent of which was
States can choose to comply with or ignore their international not effectively monitored.
obligations and usually act out of economic or political self-interest An optional protocol has been approved by the UN General
in determining their course of action. CEDAW is one of the treaties Assembly to provide an additional enforcement mechanism,
most ignored by states. Those states that have signed the treaty as exists with most other human rights instruments. This
have included many reservations, which allow them to refuse to would allow individuals and groups to be able to make a direct
comply with certain parts of the treaty. Hence, the Committee on the complaint to the CEDAW committee about alleged breaches of
Elimination of Discrimination Against Women is not able to declare the treaty. The optional protocol does not add extra rights. Rather,
a state to be in violation of the treaty where it has entered certain it tries to improve the enforceability of the existing instrument.
reservations. The committee can only continue to encourage states to The Australian government signed the optional protocol in
review their current reservations. 2008, thus sending a message to the international community
about its commitment to the treaty. Australia has a good record The Australian Human Rights Commission argued that
with respect to laws and policies for women, compared to other Australia’s signing on to the optional protocol would provide the
countries in the world. The Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) is one will to correct such deficiencies, as individuals then would be able
such mechanism. to complain directly to the committee, putting added pressure on
Critical assessments have suggested that there are gaps in our the Australian government.
laws with respect to women. For example, the Australian Human
Rights Commission 1999 report Pregnant and Productive discussed reservation a statement made optional protocol an addendum
the idea that it is a right, not a privilege, to work while pregnant, by a state when signing or to a treaty, agreed to by the
ratifying a treaty, that allows it parties at a later date, to create
and pointed out gaps in the coverage of federal anti-discrimination to exclude certain provisions or enforcement provisions or to
legislation regarding that issue. Other critics have noted that the modify them as they apply to the interpret the treaty in light of later
state’s own practice developments
Sex Discrimination Act fails to take into account the fact that gender
may combine with other characteristics of a person (e.g. race,
disability or sexuality), resulting in different forms of disadvantage.
Effectiveness of domestic responses
In other words, it is not the case that discrimination is the same for
all women, regardless of their individual attributes. Moreover, its
reliance on complaints by individuals or groups directly affected,
Anti-discrimination legislation
rather than addressing discrimination at the systemic level, makes State and federal anti-discrimination Acts provide far-reaching
enforcement problematic (see Beth Gaze, ‘The Sex Discrimination protection to women who experience any form of discrimination in
Act after Twenty Years: Achievements, Disappointments, the workplace. There are few restrictions placed on women as to what
Disillusionment and Alternatives’, University of New South Wales Law work they do. This is to some extent due to discrimination law. Women
Journal, 2004, p. 53). today have moved into the workforce in unprecedented numbers.
Adele Horen
Sydney Morning Herald, 16 April 2012
10.5 Conclusion Beth Gaze, ‘Twenty Years of the Sex Discrimination Act:
Assessing its achievements’,
The Alternative Law Journal 30(1), February 2005
Women have made substantial progress historically on many If we are to prosper as a nation, we cannot continue to
indicators. The law, however, is only a part of the solution. It is not disenfranchise 50 per cent of the population. It is in everyone’s
possible to legislate attitudes, and firmly held beliefs sometimes interest to make our society more just and more fair.
5 Outline the role of the main international mechanism that 10 Discuss the effectiveness of the Equal Opportunity for Women
promotes the rights of women around the world. in the Workplace Act 1999 (Cth) in removing barriers to equal
opportunity in the workplace.
6 How is the NSW Office for Women’s Policy different from its
Commonwealth counterpart?
Topic review
Extended response
1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the legal system in dealing with 4 Suggest some legal and non-legal mechanisms for addressing
discrimination against women. these consequences. Discuss.
Read the following quote to answer the questions below:
‘[The ideal worker] works full time and overtime and takes
Marking criteria for the extended response
little or no time off for childbearing or child-rearing. Though questions can be found on the Cambridge GO
this ideal worker norm does not define all jobs today, it defines website. Refer to these criteria when planning and
the good ones: full-time blue-collar jobs in the working-class writing your responses.
context and high-level executive and professional jobs for
the middle class and above. When work is structured in this
way, caregivers often cannot perform as ideal workers’ (Joan
Williams, Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and
What to Do About It (Oxford University Press, New York, 1999),
pp. 91–4). Discuss.
2 What consequences do these expectations of the ‘ideal worker’
have for women?
3 Do these consequences also apply to men? If your answer is
‘no’, would your answer be different if more men took a more
active role in parenting?
Chapter 11
The Bali bombings
Chapter objectives
In this chapter, students will:
➔ describe the features of international law enforcement ➔ evaluate the effectiveness of the law in achieving justice
➔ describe the interaction between domestic legal systems for victims
of Australia and Indonesia ➔ evaluate the effectiveness of legislation and other measures
➔ evaluate the effectiveness of using legal approaches introduced in response to terrorism
consistent with the rule of law ➔ locate quality information from authoritative sources
using the internet.
Key terms/vocabulary
9/11 Osama bin Laden Jemaah Islamiyah ‘war on terror’
Border Security Legislation Amendment Act 2002 (Cth) Charter of the United Nations Amendment Act 2002 (Cth)
Significant cases
R v Mallah [2005] NSWSC 317 R v Lodhi [2006] NSWSC 691
R v Thomas [2006] VSCA 165 R v Benbrika (Ruling No. 2) [2007] VSC 261
the US consulate in Bali; this was smaller and caused only slight
damage. A total of 88 of the 202 people killed were Australians.
Another 209 people were wounded, most suffering horrific burns.
Bali’s local hospitals could not cope with the number of injured and
many burns victims of all nationalities were flown to hospitals in
Darwin by the Royal Australian Air Force.
Figure 11.6 Abu Bakar Bashir, the spiritual leader of Jemaah Islamiyah
and a key figure in the Bali bombings
the Bali bombings were later arrested: Ali Imron and Ali Ghufron, also known
as Mukhlas.
The trials jihad in Islam, a term meaning ‘struggle’; used without any qualifiers it is
generally understood in the West to refer to a ‘holy war’ on behalf of Islam
The trials of the Bali bombers attracted worldwide publicity. The
image that stands out from this period is of Amrozi repeatedly
smiling during his trial, which led to his being called ‘the smiling
assassin’. Amrozi was charged with buying the explosives and the
Research 11.1
van used in the bombing. On 8 August 2003, he was found guilty in
the Bali court. He was executed on 9 November 2008. Access the internet to search for the article ‘Hambali and
Imam Samudra was portrayed as the field commander of the Bali the Guantánamo Problem’ by Joe Boyle. It provides a point
of view on the difficult question of what to do with Hambali
bombings. He was put on trial, found guilty on 8 August 2003 and
once the detention camp is closed down.
executed on 9 November 2008. Samudra thanked prosecutors for
giving him the death sentence because, he said, it would bring him 1 Read the article and summarise the key points.
closer to God. In his evidence, Samudra said that the Bali bombing 2 Identify the reasons why releasing Hambali to the
was part of jihad. Indonesian authorities may not occur.
Abu Bakar Bashir faced trial a number of times for various 3 Write a one-page report on what you think should be
charges related to the Bali bombings. He was, however, acquitted done with Hambali once Guantánamo Bay is closed
of the most serious terrorism-related charges and was sentenced down. Provide reasons for your opinion.
that could have been obtained from Hambali that would have that Led to a Bali Suspect’, by Jane Perlez. It details the steps
taken to track down and arrest Amrozi.
connected him to Jemaah Islamiyah. The Americans withheld
considerable intelligence information about Hambali from other 1 Read the article and make a list of the ‘clues’ that led to
Amrozi’s arrest.
nations’ intelligence agencies. This was in stark contrast to the
intelligence sharing between the AFP and the Indonesian police. 2 Use the internet to locate information about how the
Bashir was eventually arrested again in August 2010 for his law enforcement authorities were able to track down
and arrest Samudra and the other Bali bombers, Ali
suspected involvement in a series of terrorist scares, one of which
Imron and Ali Ghufron.
targeted President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono. In June 2011, Bashir
was found guilty in the District Court in Indonesia of using violence 3 In different cultures, facial expressions and gestures can
mean different things. Locate some evidence that may
and threats of violence to create fear or terror. The four judges
suggest Amrozi’s ‘smile’ means something other than
sentenced Bashir to 15 years in prison. However, this sentence was
what we in Australia may take it to mean.
reduced on appeal to the Indonesian High Court in October 2011.
This could see Bashir freed by 2017.
2 Identify who the Australian Federal Police worked December 2002, the second in September 2004 and the third in
with in Operation Alliance. August 2007, is to ensure that the Australian people are alert and
on the lookout for any possible warning signs of a terrorist attack.
3 Evaluate the reasons why a conviction against
Abu Bakar Bashir was difficult to secure. Some criticised this campaign for causing unnecessary fear and
creating a culture of suspicion in which people were encouraged to
spy on and ‘dob in’ their neighbours. Muslim Australians reported
Review 11.3
1 Identify the benefits of the Commonwealth
government’s National Security Campaign.
2 Identify any negative features of the Commonwealth
Figure 11.10 ‘Every detail helps’: the third phase of the National Security government’s National Security campaigns.
Public Information Campaign, launched in August 2007
Figure 11.13 Bali Memorial, Sydney Figure 11.14 The names of the 202 people killed by the Bali bombers
Figure 11.15 Former Labor Prime Minister Kevin Rudd was silent on the Human rights advocates, including the outspoken Julian Burnside,
issue of the death penalty during the execution of the Bali bombers. QC, have accused the government of hypocrisy on the issue.
Research 11.3
Using the UN website (refer to www.cambridge.edu.au/prelegal3weblinks for link) as a starting point, investigate the UN’s position
on capital punishment (the death penalty).
1 Locate the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. In what ways can this document be said to be ‘against’ the death penalty?
2 Identify the role of the UN Human Rights Council on this issue. (The Human Rights Council replaced the UN Commission on
Human Rights in 2006.)
3 Using both the UN website and a more general internet search, research the names of the countries yet to abolish the death
penalty. What reasons have these countries offered for not doing so?
4 Write a one-page report on whether you think Australia’s inconsistent position on the death penalty in relation to the Bali
bombers and the Bali Nine will harm our international reputation on this issue.
International cooperation to combat assist the Indonesian National Police in their investigations into the
Bali bombings and the later bombing of the Australian embassy
global terrorism in 2004. The AFP has also helped develop the Jakarta Centre for
Law Enforcement Cooperation (JCLEC) to augment the Indonesian
In an international context, the cooperative approach taken by
law enforcement agencies’ ability to deal with terrorism, drug
the Australian and Indonesian police forces and governments was
trafficking and people smuggling. Over 2000 Indonesian police
highly effective. While the US-instigated ‘war on terror’ had failed to
have now completed programs offered by JCLEC.
destroy Al Qaeda or apprehend Osama bin Laden, the Australian–
The cooperation between the Indonesian National Police
Indonesian effort to bring the Bali bombers to justice was a success.
(INP) and the AFP culminated in the signing of a memorandum
The one area in which this international cooperation may be
of understanding in 2002 and a visit to Australia by the Head of
considered a failure was in the attempts to convict Abu Bakar Bashir
the INP in March 2003. AFP Commissioner Mick Keelty explained
of a major role in the bombings. As noted, this failure was largely
that together Australia and Indonesia were dedicated to making
due to the United States’ reluctance to share CIA intelligence gained
the region safer by addressing the threat of terrorism wherever
from Hambali.
it occurred. Australia was committed to providing the INP with
assistance in the areas of counter-terrorism, intelligence and
Figure 11.16 Former Australian Federal Police Commissioner Mick Keelty forensics.
was in charge of the AFP at the time of the Bali bombings.
Research 11.4 ASIO Act 1979 (Cth), the Intelligence Services Act 2001 (Cth) and
the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979 (Cth).
Visit the website for the Jakarta Centre for Law Enforcement ££ Criminal Code Amendment (Terrorism) Act 2003 (Cth). This Act
Cooperation (JCLEC) (refer to www.cambridge.edu.au/
amended the Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) and other legislation.
prelegal3weblinks for link).
££ Charter of the United Nations Amendment Act 2002 (Cth). This
1 What activities are undertaken by the JCLEC? Act amended the Charter of the United Nations Act 1945 (Cth),
2 Go to the Australian section of the ‘useful links’ web which approved the Charter of the United Nations and enabled
page. What information can be accessed from here? Australia to apply sanctions giving effect to certain decisions
3 Discuss how the Centre’s activities assist in the fight of the UN Security Council. (See Chapter 2 for information
against terrorism in our region. about the UN and the Security Council.) In particular, this
amending Act deals with Security Council decisions relating to
terrorism and the Commonwealth’s ability to freeze the assets
of certain parties.
Review 11.4 ££ Anti-Terrorism Act 2004 (Cth)
1 Why do you think the Australian federal government ££ Anti-Terrorism Act (No. 2) 2005 (Cth).
was silent on the issue of the death penalty when it Australia had already been a signatory to a number of international
came to the Bali bombers? treaties that deal with terrorism. Some key treaties are:
2 What was the accusation of Julian Burnside, QC, against ££ International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist
the federal government? Why? Bombings (1997)
3 Identify the ways in which the AFP has cooperated with ££ International Convention for the Suppression of Financing of
Indonesian law enforcement authorities. Terrorism (1999).
More recently, Australia has signed the International Convention for
the Suppression of Acts of Terrorism (2005).
Anti-terrorism measures in Australia Since the Bali bombings, law enforcement authorities have
been on high alert to counter any attempted terrorist attack on
A major initiative that resulted from September 11 and the Bali Australian soil. As of 2009 there has been no successful terrorist
bombings was the implementation of anti-terrorism legislation attack on Australian soil. However, there have been a number
in Australia and a strengthening of the enforcement agencies of high-profile arrests and cases arising out of terrorism-related
responsible for homeland security. A number of terrorism-related charges. These include:
statutes were enacted by the Australian government to deal with ££ Zaky Mallah was the first person charged under the 2002
the perceived threat of a terrorist attack on Australian soil. legislation. In the NSW Supreme Court in 2005 he was found
A few of the key legislative changes were contained in the not guilty on two charges of preparing for a terrorist act
following enactments: when a jury found he had not planned to kill ASIO officers in a
££ Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism Act 2002 (Cth) suicide mission. He pleaded guilty to a charge of threatening
££ Border Security Legislation Amendment Act 2002 (Cth). This Act to kill a Commonwealth officer and was jailed for two-and-a-
amended legislation including the Customs Act 1901 (Cth) with half years: R v Mallah [2005] NSWSC 317.
respect to restricted areas; passengers, goods and mail in ££ Joseph Terrence Thomas, nicknamed ‘Jihad Jack’ by the
transit through Australia; airlines and other matters. media, was arrested in 2004. In R v Thomas [2006] VSCA 165,
11.5 Conclusion
Criticisms
The Bali bombings showed Australians that they are not immune
Some of the legislation passed by Australia, like that of some
to global terrorism. Unlike the ‘war on terror’ waged by the United
other countries including the UK and the US, has been criticised
States, the joint Indonesian-Australian response to the 2002 terrorist
as giving powers to the executive government that are far too
attack has seen the conviction of those tried and found responsible.
great. In particular, ss 23CA, 23CB and 23CD of the Crimes Act
Furthermore, Australia has gained a willing partner in the region
1914 (Cth) introduced by the Anti-Terrorism Act 2004 (Cth) have
with which to combat terrorism and illegal drug trade.
increased individuals’ risk of being detained or imprisoned without
Domestically, the Bali attack has led to the introduction of
evidence of their guilt being presented or proved in court. Laws
anti-terrorism legislation giving Australian law enforcement
permitting detention without charge conflict with Article 9(1) of the
agencies greater powers to deal with the threat of a terrorist
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
attack on Australian soil. The new legislation has attracted
The ASIO Amendment (Terrorism) Act 2003 (Cth) introduced new
heavy criticism from legal scholars, civil liberties groups and
offences relating to involvement with terrorist organisations. The
others, who have argued that it undermines key legal rights. It
definition of ‘terrorist act’ is extremely wide, resulting in many
has prompted much debate about how best to protect Australia
innocent organisations potentially being classed as terrorist. It also
from terrorism outside and inside our borders, while preserving
places the onus on a defendant to show that he or she was not
fundamental freedoms.
reckless about whether an organisation was one of those banned
by the legislation.
The Anti-Terrorism Act 2005 (Cth) alarmed the Australian
journalists’ union, the Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance.
Multiple-choice questions
1 Which of the following is NOT true of terrorism? 4 Which of the following was not a result of Australian–
a It can be utilised by fundamentalist religious groups or Indonesian cooperation since the Bali bombings?
political groups. a Australian police involved in the identification of victims
b It can be constituted by a threat of violence directed at a of the Bali bombings
population in order to induce a government to change its b the establishment of the Australian Federal Police
policies. c the establishment of the Jakarta Regional Cooperation
c It is intended to cause death, not fear. Team
d It was used prior to 2001. d the establishment of the Jakarta Centre for Law
2 Jemaah Islamiyah was: Enforcement Cooperation
a a peaceful Islamic organisation 5 Which of the following types of provision was contained in the
b a foreign terrorist organisation that established a branch in anti-terrorism legislation passed by the Commonwealth after
Indonesia the Bali bombings?
c under suspicion from the CIA for having links with Al Qaeda a detention of persons suspected of terrorism offences for
well before the Bali bombings the purpose of investigation
d the name of the Indonesian counterterrorism force b detention of illegal immigrants from countries known to
3 Which of the following alleged suspects responsible for the Bali harbour terrorists
bombings ended up walking free? c immunity of anti-terrorism legislation from judicial review
a Iman Samudra d immunity of any Commonwealth employee from
b Abu Bakar Bashir prosecution
c Amrozi
d Ali Ghufron
Topic review
Extended response
1 Discuss the anti-terror legislation, with reference to the 4 Contrast the ‘war on terror’ and the ‘rule of law’ approaches
arguments for and against a bill of rights. taken in the fight against terrorism.
2 Outline how the Australian and Indonesian governments have 5 Describe the Australian government’s policy towards the
cooperated since the Bali bombings. death penalty.
3 Outline the key stages in the investigation of the Bali
bombings.
Marking criteria for the extended response
questions can be found on the Cambridge GO
website. Refer to these criteria when planning and
writing your response.
Chapter 12
The Port Arthur massacre
Chapter objectives
In this chapter, students will:
➔ describe the key features of Australia’s courts and ➔ investigate the relationship between society and the
parliaments legal system
➔ identify the relevant legal terminology in investigating and ➔ recognise differing perspectives on issues related to the
discussing case and statute law reform of gun laws
➔ evaluate the effectiveness of Australia’s legal system in ➔ locate quality information from authoritative sources
achieving reform of the gun laws using the internet.
Key term/vocabulary
conspiracy theories indictment on remand
Relevant law
Significant cases
R v Bryant (Supreme Court of Tasmania, Cox CJ, 22 Nov 1996)
Figure 12.1 The Penitentiary at Port Arthur, near where Bryant went on his killing rampage
a general store. He used the BMW he was driving – having killed burns from the fire, Bryant was charged with just one murder. Police
the driver and passenger and stolen it – to block a Toyota Corolla said additional charges would follow. On 22 May, Bryant appeared
from leaving the pump area. He forced the male occupant into the via a video link from Risdon Prison to the Magistrates’ Court for a
boot of the BMW, shot the female occupant of the Corolla, dragged remand hearing.
her body out of the car, got into the driver’s seat of the BMW and During the following weeks, the police investigated all the events
took off down the road with the male hostage locked in the boot. A of the day, which resulted in the final charges being laid against him:
police officer arrived soon after and went in chase of Bryant a few 35 counts of murder, 20 of attempted murder, four of aggravated
minutes later. assault, eight of wounding, three of causing grievous bodily harm,
Bryant returned to the Seascape guesthouse where he had one of arson and one of unlawfully setting fire to property.
begun his murderous killing spree earlier that morning. At the Because of the magnitude of the killings, in a place popular with
house he took his hostage inside and set fire to the stolen BMW. Australian and international tourists alike, the Port Arthur massacre
At around 2 p.m. police officers arrived but were forced to take attracted considerable media attention and debate. There was
shelter for a few hours in a ditch while Bryant fired on them with interest also in Bryant himself. What kind of person would do this?
an automatic weapon. At 9 p.m. a Special Operations police team Was he of sound mind? Those who knew Bryant were questioned
arrived from Hobart. An 18-hour stand-off ensued because Bryant by journalists eager to paint a picture for the public of who Martin
claimed he had hostages. The following day, Bryant set fire to the Bryant was. A number of conflicting stories emerged. Distant
house, taunting the police to come in and get him. Eventually, relatives provided an album full of photographs. Two of Bryant’s
Bryant ran from the house with his clothes alight and was captured ex-girlfriends provided some more. On 30 April the first photos
by police. He was arrested and taken to hospital under police guard. of Bryant appeared on the front pages of the nation’s press.
During the initial period of his police questioning, Bryant The Australian newspaper enhanced a photograph of Bryant that
admitted to hijacking the BMW car but denied having shot anyone. exaggerated the whiteness of his eyes to give him an eerie, spaced-
He also stated that he had not visited Port Arthur that day. Bryant out look. Debate about Bryant’s early life, history of gun use, state
also claimed that the guns found by police were not his. During a of mind and motivations remain today, as does curiosity about his
bedside hearing in hospital where he was being held because of his life in prison.
Imprisonment
After his arrest, Bryant was held in hospital under police guard
Refer to Chapter 12 on the Cambridge GO website
while he was treated for his burns. While on remand for seven
for information relating to R v Bryant (Supreme
months, until the conclusion of his trial, Bryant was held in near-
Court of Tasmania, Cox CJ, 22 Nov 1996).
solitary confinement in a specially built cell at the medium to
maximum-security Risdon Prison. In 1997 Martin Bryant began
his formal prison sentence at the old Risdon Prison hospital and
became one of its most notorious inmates. He spent most of his
time up to 2006 alone in his cell. Though the prison authorities did
not consider Bryant to be mentally ill, they held the view that the
prison hospital was the safest place for him because he was the
most hated prisoner among the inmates. Apparently, he had been
the target of a number of assaults and many of the inmates had
made death threats against him.
In 2006, the Tasmanian government moved Bryant into the
newly constructed Wilfred Lopes Centre, a mental health facility
a few hundred metres from the prison. There are no guards inside
the 35-bed unit, only nurses, doctors and support staff, and most
inmates are not confined to cells but are free to wander around
the complex. The centre was substantially a hospital with a
Figure 12.3 Who is Martin Bryant? therapeutic environment.
remand (of an accused) in custody pending and/ or during his or her trial
Figure 12.4 Bryant’s move from maximum security at Risdon Prison
(below) to a mental health facility angered survivors and family members
of the victims of the Port Arthur massacre.
These theories do not enjoy any credibility in legal or scholarly 4 If a convicted murderer is found to be sane, what are
circles. Their merit may be at least partly determined by noting the aims of the criminal sentence imposed? Justify
Review 12.2
Aftermath
1 Identify the various conspiracy claims that have
On 25 February 2011, Martin Bryant’s mother was interviewed on surrounded the Port Arthur massacre.
the television program 60 Minutes, in which she discussed her son’s 2 How valid do you think these claims are?
condition in prison. In the interview she also made the controversial 3 In what ways do these claims dishonour the memory
claim that she now thought that her son did not commit the crime, of those who died in the massacre?
despite having believed he had done so at the time. On 10 March
2012, Martin Bryant appeared in the headlines again (‘Bryant
painting prize outrage’, The Mercury) when a controversial painting
Research 12.2
of Bryant at the site of the killings was awarded a prize. This was a
challenge to the attitude of many people in Tasmania, who felt that The articles ‘Bryant is an Overweight Zombie’ and ‘Inside
the best way of dealing with the events on that day at Port Arthur in the Mind of a Mass Murderer’ both attempt to provide
1996 was to give the killer no publicity at all, particularly since this some insight into who Martin Bryant is and explain
his motivations (refer to www.cambridge.edu.au/
is what Bryant seems to have craved. Since 1996, many Tasmanians,
prelegal3weblinks). Answer the questions below.
particularly those affected in some personal way by the massacre,
have refused to even utter Bryant’s name. Nowhere on the site of 1 How does Bryant’s mother describe her son’s
imprisonment at Risdon Prison?
Port Arthur is there any mention of his name. There seems to be
an unwritten rule in Tasmania that the best way of honouring the 2 Do the comments made by the psychologist and defence
lawyer shed any light on what motivated Bryant?
victims of the massacre is to deny any place in public memory for
this mass murderer. 3 Is there any way to assess from the information in these
The video and full transcript of the 2011 interview can be found articles whether Bryant feels any guilt for his actions?
12.3 Mechanisms for represents the interests of gun owners. The Association organised
achieving justice after the a protest march by 27 000 of its members through the streets of
Melbourne. However, public sentiment against weak gun laws
Port Arthur massacre meant that the Victorian government persevered with its reforms.
These state reforms were complemented at the federal level
Figure 12.6 When Prime Minister John Howard spoke to a hostile rally of pro-gun enthusiasts he was wearing a bullet-proof vest.
Port Arthur massacre Review of Public Affairs, argued that Australia took a public
health approach to gun law reform instead of a criminal
justice approach. The authors argued that this led to a more
Gun law reform in Australia rational philosophy of gun control, which is more effective
in reducing the number of firearm-related deaths.
From 1998, Australia experienced a marked decrease in gun deaths
Go to www.cambridge.edu.au/prelegal3weblinks for a link
when compared with the 1970s and 1980s. Handguns, however,
to download the paper.
appeared as a new menace in 2002. In a shooting that occurred
at Monash University in Victoria that year, a student, who was a
licensed pistol shooter, fired handguns in an econometrics class,
killing two students and injuring four students and a lecturer.
Research 12.3
After the Monash shootings the Australian Crime Commission Follow the link at www.cambridge.edu.au/prelegal3weblinks
was formed. It is a statutory body that, in partnership with other and read the article ‘Death tolls from world’s worst shootings.’
law enforcement agencies, develops strategies for dealing with Despite Australia’s Port Arthur massacre being one of the
serious and organised crime. One of the first things on its agenda world’s worst single non-wartime shooting, the United States
was illegal trafficking in handguns. It had become apparent that can be said to have the most frequent occurrence of shootings.
there was an increase in illegal handgun use. 1 Draw up a table showing country, gunman, location,
While handguns were emerging as the new threat in crime, the weapons, killed and wounded.
total number of deaths per year from suicide, unintentional killings 2 How does Port Arthur compare with other similar
and homicide dropped dramatically. In the 1980s the deaths per massacres?
year from gun-related causes averaged 700. By 1999 they were 3 Identify similarities in location, motivation of the killer,
around 300 and by 2003, gun-related deaths had dropped to 290 and the availability of weapons.
per year. This trend has continued since. 4 Investigate the Second Amendment to the Constitution of
While Australia has directly addressed the problem of gun the United States. Why do you think gun law reform might
deaths, other countries, such as the United States, have not been be more difficult to achieve in the US in light of this clause?
as effective in meeting this challenge. Political leaders in the United 5 Refer to www.cambridge.edu.au/prelegal3weblinks for
States have not been successful in countering the strong pro-gun a link the to website of the National Rifle Association
culture supported by the extremely effective lobbying of the NRA. (NRA). See what information you can find about how the
Gun massacres remain a feature of life in the United States, and the NRA can continue to oppose gun law reform even in the
sale of firearms continues to grow every year. face of a massacre like the one at Columbine High school.
Research 12.5
Go to the Australian Institute of Criminology website, read the abstract for ‘Firearm related deaths in Australia, 1991–2001’ (refer to
www.cambridge.edu.au/prelegal3weblinks for link), and answer the following questions:
1 What has been the percentage decrease in firearm-related 4 What was the most common weapon used?
deaths in the period 1991–2001? 5 What other weapon has seen increased use?
2 What proportion of deaths involved males? 6 Which accounted for the most deaths: homicide, accident
3 What age group has the highest risk? or suicide? What are the implications of this finding for
health professionals?
scheme. Victoria was the state to hand in the greatest proportion of ➥ Matthew Moore, ‘Buyback has no effect on murder rate’,
its registered weapons that were on the ‘prohibited’ list. 24 October 2006
The long-term effectiveness of this scheme has been closely ➥ Don Weatherburn, ‘Study no excuse to shoot down the
monitored, with conflicting reports emerging. Some have indicated law’, 26 October 2006
1 Read the two articles listed above and summarise their
that because Australia has not had a mass gun-related shooting
key points.
since Port Arthur, the buy-back scheme was a success. Other
2 Find the commentary of Gun Control Australia on this
reports have indicated that the scheme has had no real effect on
debate by searching for ‘Recent Reports on Australian
overall murder rates. The only area where the National Firearms
Gun Laws’ (10 January 2007) on the Gun Control
Agreement – the collective name for federal and state gun reforms
Australia website (refer to www.cambridge.edu.au/
– may have had some impact is in suicide rates. Part of the difficulty
prelegal3weblinks for link).
in measuring the success of the buy-back scheme and its impact
3 Write a one-page report discussing the effectiveness of
on crime rates is that 90 per cent of homicides are committed with
the gun buy-back scheme.
unregistered firearms.
Research 12.7
During the 2012 presidential campaign in the United States there were a number of gun massacres. However, there were no calls to
tighten up gun laws in the US. This situation has changed somewhat in the wake of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, and
in April 2013 the US Senate finally voted to debate gun safety legislation. The journalist, Paul McGeogh explains why he believes there
will be no reform in the United States. Former Australian Prime Minister John Howard argued that his gun reforms after the Port Arthur
Massacre were a success. The third article below analyses the claims that Australia’s post-Port Arthur gun laws were a success.
The following articles appeared in the press in 2012:
➥ Paul McGeogh, ‘In the US, the gun lobby calls the shots’, 2 Read John Howard’s article and outline his claims about the
29 July 2012. success of his reforms.
➥ John Howard, ‘Brothers in arms, yes, but the US needs to 3 Read the article by Dylan Matthews. Do his findings
get rid of its arms’, 1 August 2012. support John Howard’s arguments about the success of the
➥ Dylan Matthews, ‘Did gun control work in Australia?’, post-1996 gun laws in Australia?
2 August 2012.
4 Discuss the extent to which the law can be used effectively
1 Read the article by Paul McGeogh and outline his claims
to deal with the problem of guns.
about the role of the NRA in US political life.
Research 12.9
The problem of guns, or small arms as they are known in international law, is one that plagues the whole world. The main problem is
that too many guns are sold (both legally and illegally) to people in poor countries that are characterised by civil unrest and poverty.
Many of the thousand people killed by firearms each day are innocent women and children. There is an attempt to establish an
effective UN treaty on small arms, but without the United States’ backing, there is little chance of success.
1 Research the issue of gun violence around the world 2 Go to the UN website (refer to www.cambridge.edu.au/
by following the link at www.cambridge.edu.au/ prelegal3weblinks for link) and find out about progress on
prelegal3weblinks to the website of the International the small arms treaty.
Action Network on Small Arms (an NGO) and downloading
its report titled ‘Gun violence: The Global Crisis’.
12.5 Conclusion On the 14th anniversary of the Port Arthur massacre, the
effectiveness of the post-1996 law reforms was evaluated in an
It can be argued that Australia’s legal system has been effective in article by Simon Chapman and Philip Alpers that appeared in the
dealing with the issue of deaths from firearms since tough measures Sydney Morning Herald on 27 April 2010, titled ‘Tight gun controls the
were introduced in the aftermath of the Port Arthur massacre in most powerful weapon’. On the 16th anniversary of the massacre
1996. The dangers posed by both legal and illegal guns, however, the gun laws were again up for debate when the Justice Minister
are something that we can never become complacent about. Tragic admitted there were gaps in our gun control laws (refer to www.
accidents and suicides will continue to occur and there will still be cambridge.edu.au/prelegal3weblinks to listen to ‘Justice Minister
homicides committed with firearms. Since 2002, the proliferation admits gaps in gun control laws’). However, few people involved in
of handguns, both legal and illegal, has gained the attention of our gun law debates in Australia argue that we would be better off with
nation’s law-makers. It seems that gun-related issues are never far the US model of minimal gun control.
from resurfacing.
Our gun laws and enforcement measures need to be constantly
revisited to ensure they stay abreast of changing trends in the use
of firearms, both nationally and internationally. This is an issue in
which there is always room for further law reform.
Multiple-choice questions
1 The high-powered semi-automatic weapons that Martin Bryant 4 The toughening of gun laws in Australia since 1996 has led to:
used on 28 April 1996 were: a no change in the number of deaths from firearms each year
a imported from the United States b a doubling of the number of deaths from firearms each year
b bought legally in Tasmania c a decrease of the number of deaths from firearms each year
c acquired illegally d the elimination of all deaths from acts of homicide using
d illegal under existing Commonwealth legislation a gun
2 Martin Bryant’s motive for his crime: 5 Achieving reforms of the gun laws in the United States is
a was that he had been bullied and abused as a child extremely difficult because:
b was that he had a hatred of foreign tourists a many politicians are against making tougher laws
c was that he was insane and did not really know what b the NRA has enormous cultural power and political clout
he was doing c arms manufacturers successfully lobby politicians against
d is not known for sure tougher laws
3 The most probable reason for the growth of conspiracy d all of the above
theories about the Port Arthur massacre is:
a Australian political leaders have refused to speak publicly
about the massacre.
b Martin Bryant was denied natural justice.
c Pro-gun groups here and overseas oppose attempts by
governments in Australia to toughen the laws on guns.
d Martin Bryant was not capable of using a gun.
Topic review
Extended response
3 Evaluate the effectiveness of the Australian legal system in writing your response.
Chapter 13
Mohamed Haneef
Chapter objectives
In this chapter, students will:
➔ explore legal concepts and terminology with respect to ➔ investigate the role of the law in addressing and responding
Mohamed Haneef and the law to change in relation to terrorist threats
➔ investigate the legal system’s ability to address issues ➔ describe the legal and non-legal responses to Mohamed
relating to Mohamed Haneef Haneef’s case
➔ explore the differences in the laws in relation to ➔ evaluate the effectiveness of legal and non-legal responses
Mohamed Haneef in achieving justice for Mohamed Haneef.
Key terms
Australian Federal Police (AFP) ministerial discretion separation of powers
Anti-Terrorism Act (No. 2) 2005 (Cth) Terrorism (Police Powers) Act 2002 (NSW)
Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Terrorism) Act 2004 (NSW)
Significant cases
Haneef v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 1273 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Haneef [2007] FCAFC 203
Figure 13.3 Terrorist attacks in London, Madrid and Bali in the wake of the
September 11 attacks fuelled a ‘climate of fear’ around the world.
that stage was only a suspect in the case. Dr Haneef was the had been in continuing contact with both of the suspects of the
brothers’ first cousin once removed – that is, they shared the Glasgow attack. Dr Haneef’s laptop was seized by police and
same great-grandparents. details of financial transactions investigated. Links between Dr
➥ SIM card: During investigations into the Glasgow incident, UK Haneef and other terror suspects were also alleged, and later
police discovered a mobile phone SIM card in Sabeel Ahmed’s proved to be false.
Date Event
11 September 2006 Dr Mohammed Haneef arrives in Australia with his wife, Firdous Arshiya, under a temporary skilled working visa.
18 September 2006 Dr Haneef commences work as a registrar at the Gold Coast Hospital in Queensland.
26 June 2007 Dr Haneef’s wife, Firdous Arshiya, gives birth to their first child in Bangalore, India.
29 June 2007 An attempted terrorist attack in London fails after car bombs intended to explode are discovered and disabled.
30 June 2007 Attack at Glasgow International Airport; a distant relative of Dr Haneef’s, Khafeel Ahmed, is identified as the driver.
2 July 2007 Dr Haneef is arrested by the AFP at Brisbane Airport as he is about to board a plane to Bangalore, India.
Dr Haneef is detained under Australia’s new anti-terrorism laws pending further investigation.
14 July 2007 AFP formally charges Dr Haneef for the offence of ‘recklessly providing support to a terrorist organisation’,
punishable by up to 15 years’ imprisonment.
16 July 2007 Brisbane Magistrates’ Court grants Dr Haneef bail under ‘exceptional circumstances’, with bail set at $10 000.
Federal Minister for Immigration and Citizenship Kevin Andrews decides to cancel Mohamed Haneef’s visa.
Queensland Department of Health suspends Dr Haneef’s employment without pay pending the outcome of the
charges. Dr Haneef remains in custody without exercising his bail.
18 July 2007 Dr Haneef’s barrister, Stephen Keim SC, confirms that he leaked a transcript of the initial AFP interview with
Dr Haneef to counter a campaign of damaging allegations by law enforcement agencies.
27 July 2007 Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions withdraws the charge after the $3.2 million investigation against
Dr Haneef, citing ‘no reasonable prospect of a conviction’. This followed an admission by the AFP the week before
that the SIM card was not found at the scene of the Glasgow attack as previously alleged.
Dr Haneef is released from custody.
29 July 2007 Dr Haneef voluntarily returns to India, no longer with a valid Australian working visa.
21 August 2007 Federal Court of Australia overturns the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship’s decision to cancel Dr Haneef’s visa.
21 December 2007 Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia confirms the judgement overturning the visa cancellation.
13 March 2008 Federal Attorney-General announces an inquiry into the case of Dr Haneef, called the Clarke Inquiry.
21 November 2008 Findings and recommendations of the Clarke Inquiry are presented to the government.
15 December 2010 Dr Haneef is compensated by the federal government for an undisclosed sum.
13.2 Mechanisms for that is, short-term detention for named individuals without evidence
achieving justice in the or charges. The object of these amendments was ‘to prevent an
imminent terrorist act’ or ‘to preserve evidence of or relating to a
Mohamed Haneef case recent terrorist act’. Under a preventive detention order, a person
has the right to contact a lawyer, one family member or household
The laws applied in the case of Mohamed Haneef fall into three member, his or her employer, and one employee or business partner,
main categories: but only to let them know that he or she is safe and cannot be
➥ anti-terrorism laws which had allowed Dr Haneef to be detained contacted. The person being detained is not allowed to tell them that
for 12 days without charge he or she is under a preventive detention order.
➥ anti-terrorism laws under which Dr Haneef was eventually The Act also introduced new crimes with severe punishments,
charged, and later released after the charge was dropped including supporting or recklessly providing funds to a potential
➥ Australian migration law relating to the cancellation of terrorist. Under the new s 103.2(1)(b) of the Criminal Code (Cth),
Dr Haneef’s visa, and the later overturning of that decision. the individual did not need to know that the person receiving
These laws and other factors that were influential in Dr Haneef’s the funds was a terrorist, only that he or she was reckless about
case, including the reactions of politicians, the media and the the possibility.
community, are examined below.
reckless able to foresee negative consequences of doing something,
but carrying on with the act regardless. Recklessness implies a state of
Legal responses mind that is not as strong as an intention to do something, but for some
criminal offences it is considered equivalent to intention for the purpose
of establishing fault.
One of the features of the case that made it so controversial was the
use of recently introduced anti-terrorism laws.
The Anti-Terrorism Act (No. 2) 2005 (Cth) was passed by the
federal parliament in December 2005 amid much public and
Anti-terrorism laws and Dr Haneef
political debate. It and other laws were introduced in an effort to Following the terrorist attack at Glasgow International Airport in
hamper the activities of any potential terrorists in Australia, and June 2007, Mohamed Haneef became the first person in Australia
it included numerous provisions that were seen as a departure to be detained under the rules enacted by the Anti-Terrorism Act
from accepted standards of the criminal law and the separation of (No. 2) 2005 (Cth). Dr Haneef also became the first person to have
powers. They were widely criticised as being ‘rushed’, and in one his detention extended under the Act and the first to be charged
incident a confidential draft of the legislation was published online with supporting a terrorist organisation.
by the ACT Chief Minister, Jon Stanhope, who stated that ‘law of this Probably the most controversial aspect of the case was those
significance made in this haste can’t be good law’. Nevertheless, the first 12 days of Dr Haneef’s detention, as they involved detention
laws were passed without the full support of the parliament or the of a suspect without charge. Although the Anti-Terrorism Act (No. 2)
public, and without incorporating many of the amendments and 2005 (Cth) only permits detention without charge for 48 hours,
protections proposed. complementary state legislation implementing the preventive
Schedule 4 of the Act amended the Criminal Code 1995 (Cth). detention scheme could be passed, under which someone
The changes included the introduction of preventive detention – could be detained for up to 14 days without charge. This was
agreed between the Commonwealth and state governments for example a short period of detention following a person’s arrest
in September 2005. In NSW, the Terrorism (Police Powers) Act before he or she can practically be brought before a court, or when
2002 (NSW), as amended by the Crimes Legislation Amendment awaiting trial on remand following a charge if bail is refused by a
(Terrorism) Act 2004 (NSW), permitted exactly that, provided that court. It has been argued that state legislation that gives a state
the police obtained a preventive detention order from the NSW court a power that is incompatible with constitutional restrictions
Supreme Court to prevent an imminent terrorist act or preserve on federal courts (such as the power to grant a preventive detention
evidence of a recent terrorist act. order) is also a new and disturbing departure from the principles
Dr Haneef was not even permitted to contact his wife until he enunciated in Lim and in Kable v DPP (NSW) [1996] HCA 24.
had been held in detention for nine days. It was not until 14 July As discussed above, serious deficiencies were later discovered
2007 that the AFP made the decision, following consultation with in the evidence used by the AFP to detain Dr Haneef and repeatedly
the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (CDPP), to to extend that detention. The decision to charge Dr Haneef was
formally charge Dr Haneef under s 102.7(2) of the Criminal Code 1995 also controversial and involved questions about the quality of the
(Cth) with the offence of providing support to a terrorist organisation, evidence against him and the soundness of the decision by the
being reckless as to whether it is a terrorist organisation. AFP and Commonwealth prosecutors. This is particularly relevant
This new approach represents a significant departure from where the reliance on certain tenuous evidential links by the
accepted law regarding involuntary detention and the separation AFP and prosecutors, as outlined earlier in this chapter, suggests
of powers between the government and the courts. In the case that the case against Dr Haneef may have been one of guilt by
of Lim v Minister for Immigration [1992] HCA 64, the separation of association rather than any real evidence linking him to the
powers was interpreted by the High Court of Australia as preventing crime accused.
involuntary detention by the government except as a consequence Perhaps an earlier indication of this was evident in the granting
of a court’s finding of criminal guilt. Some exceptions are possible, of bail by the Brisbane Magistrates’ Court to Dr Haneef following
separation of powers the doctrine that the powers and functions of the
judiciary are separate from those of the legislature and the executive
Figure 13.6 The media in Australia were highly influential in shaping public opinion in the Haneef case.
Dr Haneef accepted his right to bail and release from custody, of Dr Haneef’s Australian visa. Do you think that the
cancellation was justified on the facts?
he could be liable for further detention under different laws. The
grounds for this decision were questioned not only by Dr Haneef’s
legal team but by many commentators. The Minister had made
his decision on the basis that Dr Haneef had failed the ‘character
Non-legal responses
test’ necessary for the granting of the visa, based on a reasonable
suspicion that he had an association with terrorists. Dr Haneef’s
Media and politics
legal team brought the decision before the Federal Court of As is true of many high-profile cases, the Australian media were
Australia for review. highly influential in shaping public opinion with respect to the
The charges against Dr Haneef had been withdrawn by the case of Dr Haneef. Media coverage at the time was generally highly
Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions on 27 July 2007, critical of the government’s position and the lack of evidence in the
citing ‘no reasonable prospect of a conviction’, and Dr Haneef case and there was much analysis of the impact of the government’s
was immediately released from custody and his passport new anti-terrorism laws.
returned to him. The Minister stated that he was seeking advice Perhaps the most important event in the reporting of the case
on Dr Haneef’s visa and did not intend to detain him but that he occurred when Dr Haneef’s barrister, Stephen Keim SC, leaked a
had a responsibility to act in the national interest. Without a valid 142-page transcript of Dr Haneef’s initial interview with the AFP
Australian visa to remain, and most likely without any desire to to the media. According to Keim, the transcript clearly showed
remain after these events, Dr Haneef voluntarily returned to India ‘the very thin case that the police are claiming to have’. Both
on 29 July 2007. John Howard, then Prime Minister, and Mick Keelty, then Federal
However, the Federal Court case challenging the Minister’s Police Commissioner, expressed outrage at the leak.
decision went ahead and on 21 August 2007, Justice Spender Before the source of the leak was identified, Prime Minister
of the Federal Court of Australia set aside the decision on the Howard had publicly condemned it, saying, ‘Whoever’s been
basis that the Minister had erred in applying the wrong test of responsible for leaking this document is not trying to make sure
‘association’. Justice Spender also noted that the circumstances that justice is done. Whoever’s responsible for this is trying to
had since changed. frustrate the process and it should be condemned.’
and was given a civil rights award for his effort. He was also named an
‘Australian of the Year’ by the Weekend Australian magazine.
Following Dr Haneef’s release on 27 July 2007, in an interesting
comment on political influence in the case, prominent barrister
Lex Lasry QC stated that bungles in the case against Dr Haneef may
have been caused by political pressure in an election year. ‘I think
there were pressures probably on the offices of the DPP and to
some extent on the AFP, probably resulting in converting whatever
suspicion there was into a charge which was not supported by any
evidence. I think this case demonstrates a couple of things and one
of them is that politicians ought to keep out of these cases and leave
the police to do their work.’
Legal Links
The ABC closely covered the issues in the Mohamed Haneef
case as they developed. An episode of its current affairs
show Four Corners was aired on 1 October 2007 discussing
the issues in the case. Follow the link at www.cambridge.
edu.au/prelegal3weblinks to the Four Corners website which
is devoted to the Mohamed Haneef case and includes a
viewable copy of the original episode.
Community support
Throughout the case, a number of political organisations,
community groups and professionals provided assistance as well
as commentary.
The support of people in the legal community is evident from
the fact that Haneef’s legal team, including Stephen Keim SC,
agreed to represent him pro bono, that is, at no cost. Figure 13.7 Community support for Haneef during the case was strong.
organisation may have made to the case of Dr Haneef. was the decision by the then newly elected Rudd government to
institute an inquiry into the whole affair, to establish the facts and
Australian Lawyers Alliance
determine what went wrong in the application of the laws. The
Amnesty International Australia
inquiry would include recommendations as to how to improve
Australian Muslim Civil Rights Advocacy Network
the law and law enforcement agencies, to prevent such a situation
Law Council of Australia occurring in the future.
A full copy of the official report of the Clarke Inquiry into the payment was somewhere in the $1 million category, despite
the case of Dr Mohamed Haneef can be found at the Law the government spending over $8 million during his 25-day
Council of Australia website (refer to www.cambridge.edu. ordeal. The federal government also issued a letter of apology
au/prelegal3weblinks for link). to Dr Haneef’s family. Kevin Andrews, who was the Minister for
The Australian government’s official response to the Immigration and Citizenship at the time, has refused to apologise
Clarke Inquiry is available on the Commonwealth Attorney- for his part in the case.
General’s website.
Review 13.4
1 Has Dr Haneef received any compensation from
Response to the Clarke Inquiry the Australian government for his time in detention?
Report 2 Has the government made any formal apology to
Dr Haneef or to the public for the AFP’s handling of
Following the public release of the Clarke Inquiry Report on the case?
23 December 2008 and the government’s response, a number of
events relevant to the case have taken place.
Multiple-choice questions
1 The granting of bail in the Mohamed Haneef case 4 The Minister for Immigration and Citizenship cancelled
demonstrates: Dr Haneef’s visa because:
a the seriousness of the charge a Dr Haneef had overstayed his visa.
b support for the anti-terrorism laws b Dr Haneef had given his relative his old SIM card.
c a lack of sufficient evidence c Dr Haneef was involved in the Glasgow International
d none of the above Airport attack.
2 Dr Haneef was charged on the basis of: d Dr Haneef failed the character test.
a a SIM card given to his relative 5 The new anti-terrorism laws challenge the rule of law because:
b involvement in the Madrid bombings of 2004 a Suspects like Dr Haneef can now be arrested arbitrarily and
c the cancellation of his working visa investigated for a terrorist activity.
d all of the above b State laws have been superseded.
3 The Clarke Inquiry found that: c Bail now has a higher threshold.
a Dr Haneef was guilty of aiding terrorism. d Sedition now has a new definition.
b The evidence against Dr Haneef was not sufficient.
c The AFP and ASIO had acted properly in the case.
d Minister Andrews had no right to cancel Dr Haneef’s visa.
Topic review
Extended response
Julian Assange
Chapter 21 is available
for teachers and students
in the Interactive Textbook
Chapter 14
Outlaw motorcycle gangs
Chapter objectives
In this chapter, students will:
➔ explore the background and issues related to organised ➔ discuss the legal issues that these approaches will create
crime and OMCGs in Australia ➔ describe the legal and non-legal responses to OMCGs
➔ identify and apply legal concepts and terminology relating ➔ explore the different legal approaches adopted by federal
to OMCGs and the law and state legal systems in relation to OMCGs
➔ investigate the legal system’s ability to address issues ➔ evaluate the effectiveness of legal and non-legal responses
relating to OMCGs in achieving justice in relation to OMCGs in conflict with the
➔ explore the different possible approaches of the legal state and the public.
system to organised crime and OMCGs
Key terms
bookmaking digital piracy outlaw motorcycle gangs (OMCGs)
Significant cases
The Milperra Massacre Trials R v Hawi [2012] NSWSC 332 (10 April 2012)
Figure 14.1 On 22 March 2009, Anthony Zervas was brutally murdered at Sydney Airport. The incident sparked a full review of the
legislation relating to OMCGs in NSW.
Organised crime can be defined as illegal activities organised ➥ illegal bookmaking and gambling.
by groups of criminals, most commonly for the purpose of OMCGs have been identified in Australia as operating in some of the
generating financial profit. The most well-known organised crime areas of organised crime listed above. However, it is important to
note that simply belonging to, participating in or associating with
popularised in television shows like The Sopranos and movies like committed any crime. It may only be a small number of individuals
The Godfather. In Australia, television series such as Underbelly and in such a group, rather than the organisation as a whole, who are
Bikie Wars recounted the gangland wars in Melbourne in the 1990s involved in any illegal activities. There is a serious danger that
and the Milperra (bikie) Massacre in 1984 in Sydney. all members might be ‘painted with the same brush’ without
Organised crime has a long history worldwide. Throughout justification or fair process. With motorcycle gangs in particular
history pirates, highwaymen and bandits have attacked trade routes this can be a significant problem: simply being a member of one
and roads to steal and profit from the goods being transported. of the many legitimate motorcycle gangs may arouse unfounded
Many people are familiar, for example, with the stories of the Kelly suspicion from the public, or even the police, that an individual is
Gang in 19th-century Australia. Smuggling and organised drug- involved in some kind of wrongdoing.
Figure 14.2 Hong Kong gang members are arrested in a police operation.
Clubs in NSW include the Ulysses Club, the Ambassadors and the 2 What is organised crime and how does it relate
Vietnam Veterans. The organisational structures of clubs vary, but they to OMCGs?
often have elected officers and directors, annual fees and a regular 3 What is the difference between OMCGs and
publication. The clubs often sponsor social events and organise everyday motorcycle clubs?
recreational or competition rallies. One of the biggest motorcycling
events in Australia is the Australian Motorcycle Grand Prix, an
international event held annually on Phillip Island, Victoria.
Figure 14.3 Motorcycle clubs have evolved over time in much the same way as the motorcycle itself.
Outlaw motorcycle gangs represent only a very small percentage of a skull and crossbones. The colours will also act as a crucial identifier
motorcycle groups. Some OMCGs have a long history, with one of for law enforcement agencies seeking to prove OMCG involvement.
the largest international clubs, the Hells Angels, first formed in 1948 The structure of an OMCG is often another important factor for
the law in identifying the group and its levels of membership under
quickly across all states, with NSW now home to the greatest organisation of one such club, the Hells Angels, is discussed below.
motorcycling clubs, and their roots can be traced back to the late patch a symbol or club logo
1940s, following the end of World War II. A number of motorcycling attached to the back of a
motorcycle club member’s vest
clubs began to emerge in the United States when servicemen
returned from the war. They formed clubs to mix with other returned
servicemen, to share their interest in popular motorcycling, and Research 14.1
possibly to escape the routine of returning to full-time work.
One of the first criminal incidents attributed to OMCGs was on Visit the website of the Australian Hells Angels and evaluate
4 July 1947, US Independence Day, when the AMA sponsored a the content of the site.
series of motorcycle races in the small town of Hollister, California. 1 Are there any references to criminal activity on the site?
One of the motorcycle groups involved was reported to have 2 What attitudes are conveyed by the photographs
initiated drag racing on the main streets of town, as well as drunken posted in the site’s photo gallery?
brawling. When one rider was arrested and locked in a police cell, an
estimated 750 riders challenged the local seven-man police force to
release their friend. The event became known as the Hollister riots.
In a now famous statement, an AMA spokesperson clarified that it
was only ‘1 per cent’ of the riders who had caused the trouble that
weekend, and that the other 99 per cent were law-abiding citizens.
This distinction between ‘1 per cent’ and ‘99 per cent’ is still used
by OMCG commentators today, and ‘1 per cent’ is sometimes even
used by OMCG members themselves as a mark of their identity.
It represents 1 per cent of bikies who operate outside the law.
Identity is important to OMCGs. Many motorcycle clubs, both
mainstream clubs and OMCGs, will have unique club ‘patches’ on
the back of their members’ vests. These patches feature the club’s
logo, name and often the initials ‘MC’ (motorcycle club), together
with the club’s local branch or chapter. These patches form what is
known as the club’s ‘colours’. For OMCGs, the club’s colours are very
important to both the club and its members. Sometimes in order for
a member to earn the club’s patches, the club might require a vote
and swearing of allegiance to the club, or the performance of tasks.
A member losing his (or her) colours, for example to the police or a
rival gang, might result in some form of penalty or even expulsion
from the club. Some OMCGs even have an additional patch with Figure 14.4 Club colours are made up of a number of patches.
As mentioned above, according to the Australian Crime Commission, later in an apparent suicide.
OMCGs present a visible threat of complex and highly functional ➥ In early 2007 more than 60 members of the Parramatta and
criminal networks. Although estimates vary, the cost of OMCG Granville chapters of the Nomads, previously affiliated with the
Comancheros, defected to the Bandidos. The defection caused
➥ the manufacture and distribution of illegal drugs Bandidos, involving fire-bombings and drive-by shootings and
➥ money laundering and extortion resulting in some 340 arrests and 883 charges. NSW Police set
➥ trade in stolen goods The increasing rate of drive-by shootings, which was more than 40
➥ violent crimes and motor vehicle offences. per cent higher in 2011 than in 2010, is one of the most serious crime
On the other hand, OMCG members claim that their clubs are trends in the state, the latest report from the NSW Bureau of Crime
legitimate motorcycle organisations and not used as fronts for Statistics shows. There were 100 such incidents in 2011 compared to
organised crime, as claimed by law enforcement agencies. Many 71 in 2010. The director of the Bureau, Don Weatherburn, said the
outlaw motorcycle gangs are believed to be involved in outwardly new figures showed drive-by shootings were a matter of ‘serious
legitimate businesses such as entertainment, private security, concern’ and are ‘right up there with the number one problem
One of the most important Australian cases in which OMCGs The above cases illustrate only the public, violent face of some
received widespread media exposure for violent criminal activity OMCG activities. The black market criminal activities of OMCG-
was also one of the largest criminal court cases in Australian history. related business, such the trade in illegal drugs or firearms, or illegal
The incidents occurred in a Sydney suburb in 1984, in what became financial activities like money laundering and extortion, are often
Since the Milperra Massacre there have been many public and However, reports from Australia’s intelligence agencies suggest
violent incidents involving OMCGs across Australia. Some of the that crime associated with OMCGs is on the rise, and that OMCGs
most shocking recent examples include: are moving into the maritime and security industries. OMCGs
➥ In 1999 in Geelong, Victoria, two public bombings within are becoming more sophisticated. As with legitimate business,
24 hours were the result of violence following the torture and the competition for profit and territory can result in friction and
murder of a member of the Comancheros by the Bandidos and rivalry, and the reports suggest that there may be a consolidation
the torching of the rival gang’s Sydney clubhouse. of the smaller groups into larger and more powerful organisations
➥ In Perth in 2001, former WA Chief Detective Don Hancock and controlling criminal operations in Australia.
his companion were blown up by a car bomb planted by the As an issue of public and political concern in all Australian
Gypsy Jokers, following an incident where one of the Gypsy jurisdictions, OMCGs have received much attention from law-
Jokers’ members was shot and killed in a pub. makers. Some of the attempts by law-makers and members of the
➥ In 2006 there was a drive-by shooting of a Sydney nightclub public to address the problems, and some of the implications of
named ‘Gas’, in which 50 shots were fired into the doors by three those attempts, are discussed in more detail below.
achieving justice in All Australian states and territories have statutory offences under
relation to OMCGs which the members of OMCGs can be prosecuted for criminal acts.
For example, prosecutions of participants in the violent incidents
mentioned above would have been made under standard criminal
to declare an organisation criminal, or should this only be jurisdiction (state, territory or federal), and what
powers do they have?
determined by a court? Should the organisation’s members
be given an opportunity to respond?
➥ Should a person be criminally liable for participating in such
Queensland approach
an organisation when he or she has not committed any other
offence? In 2007, the Queensland State Opposition introduced into the
➥ Should a person be criminally liable for simply associating state parliament the Criminal Code (Organised Criminal Groups)
with a member of such an organisation? Amendment Bill 2007. The bill’s purpose was to amend existing
Two central concepts of the law are brought into question by this laws to extend their coverage beyond parties to offences, and to
approach. The first is the rule of law, introduced in Chapter 1: that make it an offence to ‘participate’ as a member of an organised
is, the principle that laws should be applied in the same way to all criminal group. Its provisions included:
individuals. The danger of criminalising organisations, especially ➥ defining an organised criminal group as three or more people
where police or government officials can make the determination with an ‘objective’ of committing a serious crime for material
without court oversight, is that the law may be used to target benefit, or of committing a serious violent offence
individuals or individual associations, rather than being applied ➥ penalties of up to five years’ imprisonment for participation
equally to all. as a member of that organisation, if the person knew it was a
The second problem with the approach is that it affects a person’s criminal organisation and his or her participation contributed
fundamental freedom to associate by introducing laws of guilt by to the occurrence of criminal activity
association – under which a person may be found criminally liable ➥ defining ‘member’ to include anyone identifying himself or
simply by associating with another person who commits a crime, herself as a member, for example by wearing the club’s insignia,
even though that person has committed no crime himself or herself. patches or colours.
Three Australian states have recently attempted to enact laws Critics of the bill questioned the lack of connection between
with elements of the approaches outlined above. In Queensland, participation and actual criminal activity. The then Queensland
the first bill failed to pass in the Queensland Parliament but a Attorney-General and Minister for Justice, Kerry Shrine, described
second bill was passed, in 2009. In South Australia and New South the bill as ‘ill-conceived, unnecessary’ and ‘[extending the]
Wales, the bills were passed and enacted into law. Some of their basic principles of criminal liability to guilt by association’ where
provisions and associated issues are outlined below. ‘no specific act or omission by the accused is necessary’.
Research information about new Queensland legislation ➥ increased penalties for activities related to organised crime
targeting organised crime and answer the following questions: ➥ increased powers for police to apply for search and seizure
warrants, including the power to remove fortifications or
1 Has the law been passed?
surveillance cameras designed to stop police entry, powers
2 What changes does it make?
to pacify guard dogs and even to block drains (to prevent the
3 How does it differ from the 2007 bill discussed above?
flushing of drugs down the sink or toilet)
➥ new offences for recruiting another person to carry out or assist
in criminal activity
New South Wales approach
➥ the introduction of offences for knowingly participating
In New South Wales, there have been numerous amendments to in a criminal organisation. The definition of a criminal
the law and legislation since the 1984 Milperra Massacre. In 2005, organisation was almost identical to the one contained in
after several gang-related incidents, including the December the Queensland bill described above. Significantly, the NSW
2005 Cronulla riots, the NSW government introduced the Crimes Act did not include an offence for simply being a member of
Legislation Amendment (Gangs) Act 2006 (NSW) to bring in a series the organisation.
Media Clip
Police union warns of lack of bikie laws
Dan Oakes
Sydney Morning Herald, 20 June 2012
Outlaw motorcycle gangs are ‘making a mockery’ of the A spokeswoman for the Home Affairs Minister, Jason Clare,
legal system because of the federal government’s failure to said the government had tried to gain agreement for national
introduce national anti-bikie laws, says the union representing legislation, but had been stymied by the states. ‘We have asked
federal police. the states to refer the power to us to introduce national anti-
The Australian Federal Police Association says bikies are gang laws and give outlaw motorcycle gangs nowhere to hide,’
attaining ‘folk hero status’ while state governments struggle she said. ‘Unfortunately the states rejected our offer in April –
to introduce laws to crack down on the increasingly high- but it still stands.’
profile gangs. However, a spokesman for Victorian Attorney-General, Robert
In a letter to union members, the national president, Jon Clark, disputed this, claiming that the federal Attorney-General
Hunt-Sharman, said the federal government had failed to had raised no objections to plans by some states to enact
act on a promise to introduce national legislation that would uniform state-based laws, rather than federal legislation.
criminalise outlaw motorcycle gangs, allow authorities to The threat posed by bikies has been thrown into sharp relief
seize bikies’ assets, and provide for intelligence to be shared by recent public explosions of violence in a number of states.
by states. In 2009, a Hells Angel associate was beaten to death at
The gangs, ‘utilising their vast and suspicious “unexplained Sydney Airport in front of onlookers during a vicious brawl
wealth”, have been able to successfully challenge various state between Hells Angels and Comancheros.
laws in the High Court and thereby make a mockery of our legal Sydney has been rocked by a spate of drive-by shootings,
system’, Mr Hunt-Sharman writes. allegedly triggered by a feud between the Hells Angels and the
‘Whilst [they] get folk hero status (at least in their own Nomads, while late last year in Melbourne, Bandidos enforcer
minds), police are demoralised, having to use antiquated Toby Mitchell was shot five times in a busy Brunswick street at
legislation to combat these criminals, with the criminals 4.30pm.
getting away with murder. The South Australian and NSW governments have already
‘[The gangs] operate without regard to state or national had anti-bikie laws struck down by the High Court on the
borders. We need to ensure that there are nationally consistent grounds that they are unconstitutional. Queensland police have
laws, and this can only occur through leadership from the used new laws to apply to have the Finks declared a criminal
Gillard government.’ organisation.
Review 14.3 and broadcast media, and politicians are often keen to reassure the
Demonstrations
Update Various sectors of the public have voiced their opinions on OMCGs
and the law’s response through demonstrations. In March 2009
The High Court of Australia handed down a decision in 2011 that
about 700 members of clubs including the Hells Angels, Gypsy
has invalidated the Crimes (Criminal Organisations Control) Act 2009
Jokers, Rebels and Finks organised a ride through the towns of South
(NSW). The court found that the law was contrary to the separation
Australia’s Barossa Valley, accompanied by a police escort, to protest
of powers by undermining institutional integrity of the state’s
against the Serious and Organised Crime (Control) Act 2008 (SA). It
Supreme Court. The court also held that the law was outside of
took place in conjunction with the Gypsy Jokers’ annual ride, which
the legislative powers of the NSW Parliament. As the law conferred
had never before been open to other clubs. In a second peaceful
quite wide-ranging powers to enforcement authorities within
protest in May, about 300 members of different gangs converged
the state and pre-empted decisions that could be made in the
on Parliament House in Adelaide and presented a petition against
Supreme Court, it has been criticised as infringing fundamental
the new legislation. In response, SA Premier Mike Rann described
civil liberties. The NSW Parliament is considering its options
the laws as the ‘world’s toughest anti-bikie legislation’ and stated,
as to whether to repeal the law, amend it significantly or take a
‘We are talking about drug dealers on wheels and we are not going
completely different course of action in responding to the OMCGs
to bend or break because of [a] protest.’
(see Wainohu v NSW (2011)).
In another interesting form of protest, in response to
The NSW Parliament responded by enacting the Crimes (Criminal
Queensland’s Operation Hydra, aimed at curbing criminal OMCG
Organisations Control) Act 2012 (NSW). This Act is very similar to the
activities, a number of OMCGs met to discuss tactics to fight fines
2009 Act, but makes amendments to overcome the constitutional
issued to motorcyclists. One of the tactics was a campaign to fight
shortcomings of that Act. For instance, this new Act requires that
all fines in court to create backlogs in the system, with the aim
if an eligible Judge makes a declaration or decision under the Act,
of forcing police to reduce fines for traffic infringements.
this eligible Judge must provide reasons for the making of the
declaration.
Forming political parties
Non-legal responses In one unique response to the OMCG issue, members of the South
Australian public who were strongly opposed to the Serious and
In addition to the responses of law-makers and law enforcement Organised Crime (Control) Act 2008 (SA) and its implications for civil
agencies discussed above, there are a number of other responses rights decided to make their voice and concerns heard by politicians
to consider. These include those of the general public, the media, by establishing a new political party, the F.R.E.E. Australia Party.
politicians, interest groups, and the OMCGs themselves. Some of The party obtained formal political status on 19 March 2009
these responses are explored below. and is open to anyone who is registered to vote in South Australia.
Review 14.4 sacrificing fundamental principles such as the rule of law, the
separation of powers and the presumption of innocence, or
1 Describe some of the non-legal responses to organised individual rights such as freedom of association and freedom
crime. How do they influence changes in the law? of movement. Laws departing from these principles require
2 What non-legal responses do you believe are most mechanisms for review. While it is too soon to assess the
effective in dealing with OMCG issues and why? effectiveness of these laws – not only in reducing criminal activities
and violence associated with OMCGs, but in ensuring justice for all
parties concerned – they will be judged on the facts over time.
Legal Links
draconian laws laws that are excessively harsh or severe – from Draco, a
A link to the F.R.E.E. Australia Party’s website can be found Greek legislator (7th century BCE) whose laws imposed cruel and severe
penalties for crimes
at www.cambridge.edu.au/prelegal3weblinks.
Research 14.4
Search for recent news stories related to OMCGs and answer
the following questions:
1 Have there been any recent incidents involving
Figure 14.10 The Freedom Rights Environment Educate Australia Party OMCGs in New South Wales or around Australia? What
has branches in South Australia, Queensland and New South Wales, and happened in those incidents?
hopes to soon become a national party.
2 What recent arrests or charges have been laid against
OMCG members? Do the articles suggest that the new
14.3 Responsiveness laws have been used or have been effective?
Public order and safety are usually cited as the chief reasons for
changing the law to address OMCGs. Due to the violence often
associated with many of their activities, OMCGs receive widespread
media attention, which results in often emotive public discussion.
Review 14.5
The political responses of some Australian jurisdictions have 1 How do the responses of different jurisdictions compare
focused on ‘ramping up the laws’, being ‘tough on crime’ and in addressing OMCG-related activities? Which legal
‘smashing criminal gangs’. responses do you think are the most effective and why?
The three main types of legislative responses to OMCGs and 2 How far should the law go in attempting to address
other organised crime are laws targeting their activities, laws the activities of OMCGs and other organised criminal
establishing police taskforces and special police powers, and groups? Do you think the responses have been
laws that criminalise the organisations or their members. Not all appropriate?
jurisdictions in Australia have introduced laws in the third category.
Multiple-choice questions
1 Organised crime can be defined as: 4 Under the South Australian Serious and Organised Crime
a illegal activities carried out by organised groups, usually for (Control) Act 2008 (SA), who can declare an organisation
financial gain criminal?
b illegal activities carried out by more than one person in a a the Police Commissioner
single incident, where timing is important b the Supreme Court
c activities such as rallies and protests organised by c the Premier
motorcycle gangs without a permit d the Attorney-General
d exercise of certain police powers without authorising 5 What is one reason for enacting controversial laws outlawing
legislation motorcycle gangs?
2 The largest area of organised crime activity is: a to encourage competition between state premiers for the
a digital piracy toughest anti-bikie laws
b extortion b to give greater powers to police to compensate for their
c drug trafficking low pay
d drunken brawling c to limit motorcycle transport, which has a high degree of
3 ‘Draconian’ laws are: road fatalities
a harsh, strict and punitive d to target organised crime, which can be difficult to fight
b enforced by both state and federal governments under ordinary laws against criminal acts
c enforced by state but not federal governments
d enacted by the United Nations
Topic review
Extended response
Chapter 15
File-sharing and digital copyright
Chapter objectives
In this chapter, students will:
➔ explore legal concepts and terminology relating to digital ➔ investigate the role of the law in addressing and responding
copyright and the law to changes in relation to digital copyright
➔ investigate the legal system’s ability to address issues ➔ describe the legal and non-legal responses to digital
relating to digital copyright copyright infringements
➔ explore the differences that exist between Australian and ➔ evaluate the effectiveness of legal and non-legal responses
international law in relation to digital copyright to digital copyright infringements.
Key terms
copyright file-sharing space-shifting
extradition piracy
Copyright Amendment (Digital Agenda Amendments) Act 2000 (Cth) US Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act 2004 (Cth)
Significant cases
A&M Records Inc. v Napster Inc., 239 F3d 1004 (9th Cir 2001) MGM Studios Inc. v Grokster Ltd, 545 US 913 (2005)
Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd v Sharman License Holdings Ltd United States of America v Griffiths [2004] FCA 879
[2005] FCA 1242
Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Ltd [2012] HCA 16
property
digital piracy unauthorised
This has become an area of concern not just for the owners of the intellectual property intangible reproduction and distribution of
material but also for law-makers on a domestic and international property that has commercial digital music, software, videos or
value and can be protected by other material, often for profit
scale. The concept of intellectual property in cyberspace was law, e.g. text, images, designs,
introduced in Chapter 8. As discussed, intellectual property law inventions and computer
protects a person’s rights in relation to intellectual works and other programs
file-sharing the practice of
intangible, or non-physical, property that the person has created. distributing electronically stored
Three types of legal protection for intellectual property are patents, information such as computer
copyright an exclusive right to programs, music and video files,
trademarks and copyright. publish, copy, publicly perform, especially through the use of
Copyright is the area of intellectual property law that protects broadcast, or make an adaptation peer-to-peer (P2P) networks
a person’s right to an original expression of an idea. It allows the of certain forms of expression,
namely sounds, words or visual
creator the right to do or prohibit certain acts relating to that images
expression: to reproduce it, publish it or make an adaptation.
Figure 15.1 Copyright is one of the three types of protection entertainment for free, or for only a nominal cost. However, to
for intellectual property. the music industry and media networks, digital copying was
Figure 15.2 Computer users often illegally download overseas television series before their release in Australia, and then watch
them on their laptops, or burn them to DVD.
C hap ter 15: Fil e -shar ing and digital copyr ig ht 299
1 Outline what is meant by digital copyright and how this media and file-sharing markets.
fits into the broader area of intellectual property law.
2 Describe what is meant by copyright infringement
and piracy and how these can occur in the digital
environment.
3 Explain how issues of file-sharing arose and why it has
become a problem for industry and for law-makers.
4 Discuss some of the changes to digital copyright that
needed to be made to the law and within the relevant
industries, in order to respond to the growth of file-
sharing technologies.
C hap ter 15: Fil e -shar ing and digital copyr ig ht 301
Figure 15.5 Since 2000, the Australian government has had to review and
amend the Copyright Act a number of times to adapt it to social, economic Figure 15.6 Shawn Fanning, founder of Napster, a file-sharing website
and technological changes. that shook the foundations of the music industry
Case Space
Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd v Sharman License Holdings Ltd [2005] FCA 1242 (the Kazaa case)
A legal action was brought in the Federal Court of Australia in ‘curtail – although probably not totally to prevent – the sharing
2005 by 30 record companies, including major international of copyrighted files’, Sharman had not implemented them
labels such as Universal, EMI, Sony BMG and Warner, against because this would have been against its financial interest.
Kazaa’s Sydney-based developer and distributor, Sharman Because Sharman made its money from advertising on the
Networks. The record companies claimed that the Kazaa Kazaa system, it wanted to maximise file-sharing using its
software, by allowing users to download music for free over software to increase its advertising revenue.
the internet, encouraged copyright infringement on an Justice Wilcox acknowledged that Sharman ‘probably cannot
unprecedented scale. totally prevent copyright infringement by users’, and as a result
The Federal Court found that most of Kazaa’s music files did not order Kazaa to be shut down. Concerned to ensure
were ‘shared without the approval of the relevant copyright that the software should continue to be available for people
owner’. In his decision, Justice Murray Wilcox ruled that with who use it for legitimate purposes, the court allowed Sharman
its file-sharing technology, Kazaa was liable for copyright to continue distributing its file-sharing software, but only if it
infringement because it had ‘authorised’ users to infringe adopted certain technical measures to stop and discourage the
the record companies’ copyright. He found although there infringement of copyright using that software.
were technical measures that could have enabled Sharman to
C hap ter 15: Fil e -shar ing and digital copyr ig ht 303
Non-legal responses
It is often expensive, lengthy and difficult for those in the music
industry to pursue persons who are illegally downloading files. It is
also debatable that pursuing ordinary computer users is an effective
option. Corporations have tended to take legal action against only
serial offenders, as a deterrent, and against those who are making a
profit through copyright infringement.
In addition, it would obviously not be possible for a company
to bring a lawsuit against every individual who is infringing
copyright. Instead, consumer markets have been forced to adapt,
to offer alternatives to illegal file-sharing to meet the growing
demand. A number of industry and non-industry bodies have been
Figure 15.8 A number of industry and non-industry bodies have been
established, seeking to educate the general public and to report on established to educate the general public on copyright and infringement
the ongoing developments. issues regarding media obtained over the internet.
C hap ter 15: Fil e -shar ing and digital copyr ig ht 305
Legal Links
The Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT) provides news articles and updates on criminal prosecutions against movie
piracy and copyright infringements in Australia. Visit the website (a link can be found at www.cambridge.edu.au/prelegal3weblinks)
to view some of the current criminal cases under way against Australians who have infringed film copyright and some of the penalties
that have been applied.
C hap ter 15: Fil e -shar ing and digital copyr ig ht 307
Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Ltd [2012] HCA 16, 20 April 2012
C hap ter 15: Fil e -shar ing and digital copyr ig ht 309
MOST people who illegally download movies, music and TV ‘I think what it comes down to is freedom,’ he said.
shows would pay for them if there was a cheap and legal service ‘They just want to know that they’ve got the data, they can
as convenient as file-sharing tools like BitTorrent. watch it whenever they want, on whatever device they want,
That’s the finding of the most comprehensive look yet at they can watch it three months later, or a year later, and not
people who illegally download TV shows, movies and music in have any time limitations.’
Australia, conducted by news.com.au and market research firm If there was a legitimate online service that gave people the
CoreData. same freedoms offered by pirated media at a cheap price, Mr
The survey canvassed the attitudes of more than 7000 Crafti said many downloaders would switch to it.
people who admitted to streaming or downloading media from ‘They’d be happy to be signed up to it, to be able to not have
illegitimate sources in the past 12 months. to search BitTorrent and have to figure out which bad quality
It found accessibility was as much or more of a motivator version of it to get,’ he said.
than money for those who illegally download media using ‘While some people would still not pay for it, there’d be
services like BitTorrent. enough people who would pay for it to create and maintain a
More respondents said they turned to illegal downloads very sustainable media industry.’
because they were convenient than because they were free,
Stealing from the rich
when it came to all three types of media covered by the survey
Neil Gane, the executive director of anti-piracy group Australian
– TV shows, movies and music.
Federation Against Copyright Theft, said there was a need for
And more than two-thirds said they would pay for downloads
businesses to develop more flexible models – but they were
from a legitimate service that was just as convenient if it existed.
being hampered by piracy.
The hypothetical legitimate service was described as giving
‘This is something that consumers obviously want, and it’s
users access to TV shows, movies and music they wanted, when
something that legitimate businesses are striving for,’ he said.
they wanted them, without ads or copy protection.
‘[But] I think industry and government have to address the
The survey also found:
current rampant infringement that’s available online.
• T V shows are illegally downloaded more regularly, and by
‘Movie industries obviously want to make their content
more people, than movies or music.
available online, but they can’t compete currently with a free
• Gen Y is prepared to pay more for legal downloads of TV
alternative that’s perpetrated through theft.
shows and movies than any other age group, while people
‘Once there is a level playing field, I think you’ll begin to see a
between 31 and 50 are more likely to pay top dollar for music.
lot more flexible, innovative business models.’
• The most popular prices for legal downloads chosen by
Mr Gane also questioned whether pirates would really be
respondents were $1 per TV show, $2 per movie and 50c
prepared to pay for legitimate downloads, or were simply saying
per music track.
they would in order to justify their behaviour.
Freedom of use ‘We’ve always seen a Robin Hood type of attitude towards
David Crafti, president of the Pirate Party Australia political movie piracy and certainly when it comes to downloading and
group, said the survey results showed illegal downloaders were illegal file-sharing in general that it’s all about hurting the Tom
in fact frustrated consumers. Cruises of the world who are probably paid too much money in
‘People aren’t just looking for a free ride. They’re living in the the first place, and it’s essentially a victimless crime,’ he said.
modern world and expecting business models to keep up with ‘This type of Robin Hood attitude is often used to justify such
them,’ he said. behaviour that the majority know very well is illegal.’
Mr Crafti said restrictive copy protection measures that
The price is wrong
‘crippled’ many legal download stores – such as locking movie
Mr Gane also said some of the prices survey respondents said
or music files so they can only be played on specific devices –
they were prepared to pay for legal downloads were unrealistic.
turned users off buying media through legitimate channels.
More than two-thirds of respondents in news.com.au’s 3 Explain what is meant by the ‘Robin Hood’ attitude.
survey said they would be prepared to pay for movies through 4 Do you think that people have unrealistic expectations
a convenient legal download service. about the prices that they are willing to pay? Justify
Almost half said they would pay $2 per movie, followed by your answer.
28 per cent who said they would pay $5 and a minority who
5 Given that this survey was carried out in 2010, do you
would fork out a premium price of $10.
think that people’s opinions are still the same? Why or
Mr Gane said the most popular price – $2 per episode –
why not?
wasn’t going to cut it for the film industry.
‘The average [cost of a] Hollywood movie in 2008 to make
and market was $108 million. So it’s a very expensive business
and it’s a very risky business. To expect to be able to purchase
a copy of that movie for $2 is a rather unrealistic ask,’ Mr Gane
Research 15.3
said. 1 Research some of the recent cases involving file-sharing
The expectation of getting something for nothing, or close
and digital copyright, including the Australian case
to nothing, was a by-product of the internet era and would have
between AFACT and internet service provider iiNet.
to change, Mr Gane said.
How do you think these cases are changing the
‘There’s almost a devaluation of quality content in the
effectiveness of digital copyright in Australia and its
internet space and this devaluation has perhaps been one of
the negative legacies of the digital age,’ he said. impact on ordinary computer users?
‘There is a cross-section of the online community who now 2 A controversial new international treaty on copyright
mistakenly almost believe this warped maxim that if it’s online infringement called the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade
it should be free.’ Agreement (ACTA) has been negotiated in response to
The Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft protects pirated copyright-protected works. Carry out research
the copyright interests of the film and television industry on this treaty and consider how it might affect Australian
in Australia and represents major studios including Village
copyright laws. Why is it seen as controversial?
Roadshow, Disney, Paramount, Sony, Universal, Fox and
Warner Bros. 3 Go to the AFACT website and write 2–3 paragraphs
Earlier this year the group lost a court case launched against about the information provided on this website.
internet service provider iiNet over the alleged copyright
infringements of its customers.
Australia’s Pirate Party is based on the Swedish group of
the same name, which won about 7 per cent of votes in the Review 15.4
country’s 2009 election.
1 Discuss whether and in what circumstances criminal
The local group says it is focused on civil liberties and
copyright law reform and plans to contest the next federal prosecution for copyright infringement is an appropriate
election. response.
According to the most recent statistics, from 2006, film piracy 2 Explain why the case of Hew Raymond Griffiths was
costs the movie industry in Australia about $230 million a year, important for Australia and outline the outcome of
with internet pirates blamed for up to $92 million of that. the case.
Mr Gane said that figure would only have risen in recent years
3 Discuss whether you think the responses to digital
as broadband speeds in Australia increased.
copyright infringement in Australia and around the
world have been sufficient and what actions you think
might be used in the future.
C hap ter 15: Fil e -shar ing and digital copyr ig ht 311
Multiple-choice questions
1 What is the meaning of internet piracy? 4 Why was AFACT established?
a the downloading of movies without the owner’s permission a to lobby for the rights of Australians accused of internet
b the downloading of music without parental permission piracy in the United States
c the downloading and/or distribution of media without the b to represent Australians concerned about freedom of
owner’s permission expression and civil liberties
d the downloading and/or distribution of media without c to protect the music industry from illegal downloading and
parental permission educate the public about internet piracy
2 How are copyright owners protected from internet piracy in d to protect the film and television industry from illegal
Australia? downloading and educate the public about internet piracy
a by professional standards of ethics in the music and movie 5 Why is the case USA v Griffiths so important?
industries a It involved the creation of enormous wealth through illegal
b by state and territory laws downloading using the internet.
c by the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) b It involved an Australian citizen being charged in an
d by Border Protection Command American court for crimes committed on the internet.
3 What effect has the Australia–United States Free Trade c It involved a case of mistaken identity, as the prosecution
Agreement had on the protection of copyright in Australia? assumed Griffiths was American.
a It has helped to develop more uniform copyright laws. d It involved an American citizen being charged in an
b It allows Australians and Americans to copy each other’s Australian court for crimes committed on the internet.
media for free.
c It has provided one copyright law for the whole world.
d It has provided an agreement that Australia and America
will play each other’s music on the radio.
Topic review
Extended response
‘Digital copyright is effectively protected in Australia.’ Critically
evaluate this statement with reference to some of the legal efforts Marking criteria for the extended response question
to protect digital copyright. Also discuss some of the non-legal can be found the Cambridge GO website. Refer
responses to the issue and their effectiveness. to these criteria when planning and writing your
response.
C hap ter 15: Fil e -shar ing and digital copyr ig ht 313
➔ explore legal concepts and terminology in respect to drugs ➔ investigate the role of the law in addressing and responding
and drug testing to change in relation to drug testing
➔ investigate the ability of the legal system to address issues ➔ describe the legal and non-legal responses to drug testing
relating to drug testing ➔ evaluate the effectiveness of legal and non-legal responses
➔ explore the differences that exist between state and federal to drug testing.
law in relation to drug testing
Key terms
illicit drug privacy consent
Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (NSW) Rail Safety Act 2008 (NSW)
Road Transport Legislation Amendment (Drug Testing) Act 2006 (NSW) Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority Act 2006 (Cth)
Significant cases
BHP Iron Ore Pty Ltd v Construction, Mining, Energy, Timberyards, Endeavour Energy v Communications, Electrical, Electronic,
Sawmills and Woodworkers Union of Australia (WA Branch) [1998] Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union
WA IR Comm 130 of Australia; Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and
Services Union; Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists
Shell Refining (Australia) Pty Ltd, Clyde Refinery v CMFEU [2008]
and Managers, Australia (C2012/3396)
AIRC 510
Table 16.1 2010 National Drug Strategy Household Survey report, July 2011
Any illicit excluding pharmaceuticals 13.7 14.2 19.0 14.2 12.6 10.9 12.0
Pharmaceuticals
None of the above 21.0 17.8 14.2 14.7 13.7 14.1 16.6
legal drug a drug that is not illicit drug also called an illegal
prohibited under the law, drug; a drug that is prohibited
although some other restrictions by law
may apply
Figure 16.1 A selection of mind-altering substances
Figure 16.5 Under the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act
2002 (NSW) s 148, police do not need a warrant to use sniffer dogs to
detect drugs in pubs, at entertainment events and on public transport in
Figure 16.4 Australian laws impose many restrictions on tobacco products. New South Wales.
Figure 16.7 Workplace safety is one reason put forward to justify random drug testing in the workplace.
Railway employees of all armed services personnel as part of the Prohibited Substance
Testing Program. A person may also be required to undertake a
Employees of the State Rail Authority in NSW may be subject
drug test before appointment or enlistment.
to drug testing under the Rail Safety (Drug and Alcohol Testing)
Regulation 2008 (NSW). The most significant reason for this testing Airline employees
is the safety of drivers, passengers and the general public, given the
Some Australian airlines conduct pre-employment testing of
high possibility of danger should something go wrong.
some employees, particularly flight and cabin crew. Recent
Employees carrying out ‘rail safety work’, as defined in s 7 of
events have also resulted in the federal Civil Aviation Safety
the Rail Safety Act 2008 (NSW), include drivers, signal operators,
Authority (CASA) lobbying for the introduction of new civil
workers who couple or uncouple trains, those whose work
aviation regulations, to permit drug testing of employees in areas
in maintenance, repair or inspection of trains, equipment or
in which safety is critical including air traffic controllers, baggage
infrastructure, and those who manage and monitor safe working
handlers, refuellers and other ground staff. Under the Civil
systems or passenger safety. All of these employees are subject to
Aviation Act 1988 (Amended 2011), CASA has been given wider
the Regulation. These employees can be randomly tested before
powers to drug test airport workers.
or during their shifts where there is reasonable cause to believe
that there are drugs in their system, or where the employee has
been involved in an accident.
Media Clip
Airline staff test positive to alcohol, drug tests
Miles Kemp
Advertiser, 17 May 2012
DOZENS of aircraft engineers, airline cabin crew, refuellers, ‘CASA is heartened by the extremely low rate of positive
security staff and baggage handlers have tested positive in results as a percentage of the total number of drug and alcohol
drug and alcohol tests. tests conducted, but naturally would prefer to see no positive
The tests were conducted by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority. results,’ the spokeswoman said.
CASA was given the power to randomly test employees in ‘The drug and alcohol testing program will continue as part
sensitive areas of the aviation industry in September 2008. of a range of CASA surveillance activities aimed at maintaining
The Advertiser (Adelaide) applied for details of the testing Australia’s very high level of safety in aviation.’
under the Freedom of Information laws because CASA The results did not include mandatory tests after accidents
would only publicly release the number of random tests, or when employers suspected staff were drug or alcohol
not the results. affected. The staff were tested for drugs including cocaine,
In response, CASA released documents showing 41 people methamphetamine, ecstasy and morphine.
had been caught, with 13 later cleared of any wrongdoing. The 28 positive tests that resulted in further action included
A CASA spokeswoman said the results should be compared a refueller, a security guard, five aircraft engineers, eight cabin
with the number of tests carried out – 29 192 alcohol tests and crew, four baggage handlers, one service employee and five
22 443 drug tests. people whose employment categories were not recorded.
1 What are some of the main reasons employers and the established by the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority Act 2006
public might want to introduce workplace drug testing? (Cth). It has the power to investigate anti-doping rule violations,
make recommendations on its findings, and present cases against
2 What are some of the most important issues for
employees who are facing a drug test? alleged offenders at sport tribunals.
The term ‘doping’ refers to the use of a drug to improve athletic
3 What types of workplace are subject to drug testing
performance, and drug testing of people in sport involves some
in Australia and do you think it is justified? What other
workplaces do you think should consider drug testing different issues from those usually present in the workplace.
Michael Turtle
ABC Online, 26 March 2008
When drug testing is to be carried out, there are three parties to be is entrenched in both the common law and legislation in the
considered: the person being tested, the person (or organisation) form of prohibitions on criminal assault. It is also implied by the
carrying out the testing, and the general public. Parties’ rights and tort of trespass to the person. The law may consider a breach
of a person’s bodily privacy to be an act of assault or trespass
include employment law and criminal law. circumstances can a lawful invasion of a person’s bodily privacy
occur without this consent: for example, in some situations
of medical emergency where that person is unconscious or
Privacy and consent
otherwise incapable of consenting.
Australian privacy laws offer some protection to individuals Under the Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 (NSW), testing can
required to undergo a drug test. Several different types of privacy be carried out on a person who is suspected of having committed
are relevant to drug testing: a crime. Generally, a forensic procedure can be carried out with the
££ information privacy – including rules about the collection informed consent of the person. Intimate forensic procedures (such
and handling of personal data and records as taking a blood sample) can be undertaken without the person’s
££ bodily privacy – protection from physically invasive consent, but only with an order of a magistrate or other specially
procedures, such as blood or saliva tests, without the authorised officer. Non-intimate forensic procedures (such as a self-
person’s consent administered buccal swab) can be carried out without the person’s
££ privacy of communications – protects information that a consent, by order of a senior police officer.
person sends or receives, such as mail, email, text messages or
phone conversations privacy a person’s right to be free from unwanted intrusion or public
scrutiny
££ territorial privacy – limits intrusions into certain environments,
such as video surveillance, searches or identity checks in the
workplace or in the home.
information privacy protection against inappropriate handling of a
In New South Wales, the Privacy and Personal Information person’s personal information, with rules for the collection and handling
Protection Act 1998 (NSW) sets out 12 Information Protection of personal data and records
Figure 16.10 Physical and information privacy are two issues linked to Figure 16.11 In some sectors, drug testing may become part of the
drug testing. interview process.
would be unlikely to support, for example, a prohibition on caffeine businesses. Follow the link at www.cambridge.edu.au/
prelegal3weblinks to their website and read about how
or aspirin, or the testing of individuals for the presence of these
the laws you have learnt about apply.
substances.
Public support of drug testing proposals can often be critical
to their success. For example, in a 2004 survey conducted by
the Australian Government Office of the Privacy Commissioner, The media
respondents were asked about their attitudes towards random
A further consideration, especially where issues of integrity and
drug testing. Of the respondents, 16 per cent said that drug
reputation are important, is the media. The media can play an
testing of employees was never appropriate. The majority of
important role in informing the public about drug testing, and
respondents (59 per cent) saw random drug testing as appropriate
media coverage, both positive and negative, can be important in
only where necessary to ensure safety, and only 23 per cent
encouraging or discouraging its spread.
of respondents suggested that drug testing was appropriate
Media coverage is especially influential with respect to
whenever employers chose.
drug testing in sport. It can have a significant impact on the
perceived integrity of high-profile sports figures or sporting
Trade unions clubs. While the exposure and condemnation of illicit drug use
As discussed above, trade unions can play an important role in can be considered a positive consequence, media coverage
negotiating employment contracts and workplace drug testing and commentary can also have a detrimental effect on clubs or
policies. Unions may be able to provide additional support such even individual careers, especially where allegations of drug use
as mediation or counselling services, provide a voice for concerns cause long-lasting damage to reputation but are not based on
about the way a policy is being implemented, or help to persuade factual evidence.
organisations to change or update their drug testing policies
if required.
The Australian National Council on Drugs, as mentioned users, and only by chance might they detect a supplier.
above, provides advice and advocacy to government For employers and employees, one of the most important
and the public on drug-related issues and is influential in methods of oversight is provided by state and federal industrial
shaping national drug policy. relations systems that cover disputes between employers and
The Australian Drug Information Network (ADIN) serves employees. Judgements of these industrial relations tribunals
as a central point of access to alcohol and drug information have been able to provide some guidance on best practice in the
provided by prominent organisations in Australia and use of drug testing programs. The following case illustrates the
internationally. importance of consultation with employees when drafting a drug
The NSW Road Transport Authority provides information testing policy. It was one of the first Australian cases involving
and advice in relation to roadside drug testing of motor compulsory drug testing in the workplace. It was brought before
vehicle drivers. the Western Australian Industrial Relations Commission in 1998.
Links to their websites can be found at www.cambridge. More recent cases have tested the fairness and consistency
edu.au/prelegal3weblinks. of random employee drug testing policy. For example, in 2003 in
the case Candido v Hi Fi Supermarket Pty Ltd [2003] AIRC 983, the
Australian Industrial Relations Commission (AIRC) ruled that the
16.3 Responsiveness of dismissal of a salesperson for smoking marijuana at work was unfair
because the two other employees caught smoking marijuana were
the law only given a warning.
In another important case from the AIRC, Shell Refining (Australia)
As we have seen, there are a number of ways in which the Australian Pty Ltd, Clyde Refinery v CMFEU [2008] AIRC 510, the relevant union,
legal system addresses drug testing. There is legislation prohibiting while not disputing the role played by drug testing in workplace safety,
or restricting certain drugs and creating offences for certain dealings argued that the testing of urine samples detects drug use over a longer
with those drugs. There is legislation relating to drug testing in period than did oral samples – not merely recent use. Impairment
individual workplaces, for example in the Australian Defence Force resulting from drug use tends to last for hours, not days. Therefore,
or RailCorp NSW. Drug testing in sport is overseen by a different urine samples could be seen as an unnecessary invasion of privacy and
legislative regime and advisory bodies, as well as individual saliva samples should be sufficient. Shell’s position was that the policy
sporting codes and sporting tribunals. For other workplaces, more was designed to address habitual drug use as well as actual impairment,
general laws relate to issues of information privacy and bodily and that urine testing provides more information. The AIRC held that
privacy, especially in relation to consent. because urine testing has a longer ‘window of detection’, which may
While it is clear that workplace drug testing in New South Wales interfere with employees’ privacy, it would be unjust and unreasonable
is being carried out by various organisations in both the public and to use that method when a more precise method is available. Saliva
private sectors, the full extent of this practice and the effectiveness testing both indicates actual impairment and is unlikely to detect drug
of current laws in protecting the parties’ interests are difficult to use having no effect on employees’ performance. In the same case,
measure. Particularly in the private sector, the extent to which drug the Commission also found that it was appropriate for Shell to conduct
testing practices are routinely carried out is not clear, especially drug testing for some employees and not others.
16.4 Conclusion and monitoring take place, and that the consequences of a positive
test result are fairly applied. As technologies evolve and drug
Drug testing continues to be an area of concern for many testing expands into different areas of society, the law will continue
Australians. As it is a relatively recent practice, states have to develop to provide greater clarity in relation to parties’ rights
Multiple-choice questions
1 What are illicit drugs? 4 Which type of privacy is most important to consider in drug
a drugs that the law restricts testing?
b drugs that you can only buy with a medical prescription a territorial privacy
c drugs that the law prohibits b bodily privacy
d all of the above c privacy of communications
2 For what reasons might employers randomly test workers d information privacy
for drugs? 5 What issue was the dispute about in Shell Refining v CMFEU?
a to keep samples of workers’ DNA on file a whether employees could take recreational drugs on their
b to see whether workers are able to carry out their work holidays
duties responsibly and safely b whether all employees should be tested
c to abide by laws set down by the government c whether urine or oral samples should be tested
d to show workers that drugs are not acceptable in the d whether all employees should be tested and whether urine
workplace or oral samples should be tested
3 Which of the following is NOT a reason for drug testing in sport?
a to ensure that no athlete enjoys an unfair advantage
provided by performance-enhancing substances
b to protect athletes’ health and safety
c to protect sporting clubs’ reputation and integrity
d to ensure that professional athletes are earning no
additional income from illicit drug dealing
Topic review
Extended response
1 ‘The technology of drug testing is being permitted to shape the 2 Evaluate the effectiveness of the legal system in achieving
limits of human privacy and dignity. The situation should be justice for both employees and employers in the area of
the other way around’ (Privacy Committee NSW 1992). Evaluate random drug testing.
this statement, drawing on arguments for and against random
drug testing.
Marking criteria for the extended response
questions can be found on the Cambridge GO
website. Refer to these criteria when planning and
writing your responses.
Key terms/vocabulary
asylum direct discrimination overstayers vilification
bridging visa indirect discrimination penalty unit White Australia Policy
class action merits review people smuggling
Relevant law
Important legislation
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986 (Cth)
Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW)
Racial Hatred Act 1995 (Cth) Discrimination Act 1991 (ACT)
Significant cases
A v Australia (1997) CCPR/C/59/D/560/1993
Australia has had a long history of migration since the arrival of mechanisms for protecting the rights and interests of migrants,
the First Fleet in 1788. Gold rushes and world wars have seen with an emphasis on multiculturalism.
17.2 Migrants and the law abandonment of the policies of assimilation and integration. He
called for a more tolerant approach to the cultures that existed in
Section 51(xxvii) of the Australian Constitution gives the Federal the community. The Australian government investigated the needs
Parliament the power to make laws about immigration. Permission of migrants and its findings were released in 1978 in the Galbally
to travel to, enter and remain in Australia is given by the federal Report, named for the chair of the committee that produced it,
government in the form of a visa. For those who wish to come Frank Galbally. The report declared that migrants were socially,
for a temporary period, visas are issued for studying, short work economically and politically disadvantaged, and that the only
placements and tourist travel. Current migration law is contained way to overcome this discrimination was to adopt a policy of
in the Migration Act 1958 (Cth). This Act has been amended many multiculturalism.
times and contains over 500 sections as well as 200 regulations.
In Australia the Department of Immigration and Citizenship
(DIAC) assesses all applications of people who wish to migrate
to Australia.
2 Cam br i d g e Le g al Studi es – HS C
2 Why do you think DIAC makes it easier for some family of the review, the test is undergoing several changes to eliminate
3 Describe the problems that prospective migrants viewed on the Australian Government Citizenship website (refer to
4 Cam br i d g e Le g al Studi es – HS C
Irving was convicted in Germany in 1992 for defaming the c What problems has he met with around the world?
memory of the dead and was expelled from the country the d Should we allow someone whose views we disagree
following year. He was also deported from Canada in 1992 with to enter Australia?
for lying to an immigration adjudicator. He also owed the
Australian government $35 140 after previous failed appeals.
6 Cam br i d g e Le g al Studi es – HS C
Ian McPhedran
The Daily Telegraph, 12 July 2012
Three boats have been ‘rescued’ within 100km of the coast of Opposition immigration spokesman Scott Morrison said naval
Java in the past few weeks. and customs vessels were being co-opted by people smugglers
If an emergency is declared by a vessel near Java and to deliver their passengers for them to Christmas Island.
a navy patrol boat is dispatched from Christmas Island to ‘Despite distress calls being made by vessels within the
conduct the rescue, the cost is about $40,000 a day at sea for Indonesian search and rescue (SAR) zone and under the
the two-day job. co-ordination of Indonesian authorities, passengers are now
If a large warship such as a frigate is involved then the cost being ferried directly to Christmas Island,’ Mr Morrison said.
rises to about $570,000 a day at sea or $1 million for the two- But navy sources said the ruse would become even more
day operation. common if the Coalition’s ‘turn or tow back’ policy was involved.
Should a survey ship be the rescue vessel, the cost would be The patrol boat HMAS Childers arrived about 100km south
about $280,000. of Java yesterday morning to rescue a boat in distress with
Two patrol boats and a third navy ship, either a survey vessel 65 people on board. They were transferred to the navy boat
or a frigate such as HMAS Newcastle which will be on station and the customs vessel ACV Triton.
from July 24 to 31, are on permanent duty in the Christmas On Tuesday, the Childers responded to another distress call
Island area. but the boat showed ‘no visible signs of distress’.
If asylum seekers have to be moved from Ashmore Reef to The cost of border protection operations has risen
Christmas Island the cost is more than double. dramatically since 2009.
According to Defence, ‘full costs’ include personnel costs Another three boats carrying 153 ‘probable illegal
(salaries, allowances and superannuation), rations, fuel, explosive immigrants’ have arrived at Christmas Island in the past three
ordnance, general stores inventory, other suppliers expense and days, taking the tally so far this year to 5723 people on board
on-costs (representing partial recovery of overheads). None of 78 boats. Since the last election in June 2010, a total of 210
the costs include depreciation of the respective vessels. boats have arrived carrying 13,825 people.
People smugglers have ramped up the ‘SOS’ tactic and
have been calling for help even when vessels are seaworthy
and underway.
Review 17.3
1 Briefly describe the three streams of the migration program.
2 For whom is the offshore component of the humanitarian program designed? What are the two categories of people that
it covers?
3 What criteria must someone meet in order to be classed as a refugee?
8 Cam br i d g e Le g al Studi es – HS C
There are two types of unlawful non‐citizens in Australia. The in his or her country of origin?
first includes those who enter Australia on temporary visas but do 2 What happens if a border applicant does not meet the
not leave when the visa expires. This group, known as overstayers, criteria for refugee status?
makes up the largest number of illegal migrants in Australia. The 3 Why might someone not obtain the correct visa if he
second group comprises people who arrive in Australia with no or she wants to seek asylum in Australia?
form of entry permit at all. Because a large proportion of these
people have travelled by boat to the northern shores of Australia,
they are sometimes called ‘border applicants’ or ‘boat people’. Laws and policies relating to illegal immigrants
The majority of these unauthorised entrants since the 1990s
Government concerns in 2001
have come from Afghanistan and Iraq. Many arrive as a result of
people smuggling. In 2000 and 2001, the Australian government under John Howard
All border applicants who are found to meet the criteria for expressed concerns about large numbers of illegal immigrants
refugee status now receive a PPV. Under the Howard government, coming to Australia by boat, and in particular illegal arrivals
they received a three‐year TPV, which allowed them to live and brought by people‐smuggling operations from Indonesia
work in Australia but not to sponsor a spouse or children to join to Australia (6640 people arriving on 83 boats). Some of the
them. They could not travel overseas to visit their families in a safe concerns were:
third country and then return. They had to wait 30 months from the ££ Illegal arrivals are a criminal risk and may pose a threat to
granting of the TPV to apply for a further protection visa. national security, a threat that could include terrorism.
People who were granted a TPV in the past can apply for a ££ Processing costs are high.
Resolution of Status visa, which gives access to the benefits of ££ They pose a health and quarantine threat, to persons and
the PPV. agriculture.
Holders of a PPV have access to social services such as the Adult ££ Illegal immigrants infringe Australia’s sovereignty.
Migrant English Program, age or disability pensions and family tax ££ People smugglers are criminals, often with links to organised
benefit. They can also sponsor their families through the offshore crime.
Humanitarian program. The legal responses of the Howard government to these concerns
However, the number of applications received is greater than will be discussed below. Whether or not these responses were
the number of available visas: for example, in 2010–11, more justifiable ways of addressing these concerns is a separate issue.
than 54 000 people applied but only 13 799 were granted visas. It is clear, however, that some of the ideas expressed or suggested
If someone does not meet the conditions for refugee status, he or in the media at the time relied on misconceptions and stereotypes
she can be removed from Australia. about illegal immigrants. These include:
The term ‘asylum seekers’ may be preferable to ‘illegal ££ Attempting to enter Australia without the proper entry permit is
immigrants’ when referring to border applicants. People fleeing unfair to asylum seekers who do go through the legal channels
their countries may face a death sentence there, and there are and ‘wait their turn in the queue’.
Research 17.2 – not subject to judicial review. Section 166 states that persons
arriving in Australia must present identification, and s 190 states
Go to the website of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees that they can be detained if they fail to do so.
(refer to www.cambridge.edu.au/prelegal3weblinks for link) It is not clear how making it more difficult for asylum seekers
and carry out the following research:
to gain entry to Australia, or measures against them such as
1 What work does this agency do? detention (discussed below), can be considered a reasonable
2 Profile its work in one of the identified geographic means of deterring people smugglers. Unscrupulous people
regions. taking advantage of others’ fear and desperation do not care
3 How does it help (i) asylum seekers and (ii) refugees? what conditions the others are sent to. As for the asylum seekers
Write a summary about one of the ‘asylum seekers in themselves, most do not know the content of Australia’s domestic
the news’ issues. policies, and others are willing to take the risk given the conditions
they are fleeing in their countries of origin. It has been suggested
Legal Info
The Tampa incident
In August 2001, a Norwegian tanker called the Tampa picked up 433 asylum seekers from a boat sinking in international waters
between Australia and Indonesia.
The Australian government ordered the Tampa not to enter Australian waters, but the captain defied the order and moved towards
Christmas Island. The Special Armed Services (SAS) was ordered to board the vessel, naval and air force patrols of international waters
between Australia and Indonesia were stepped up, and the government rushed in legislation to give it more certain legal backing.
The government refused to accept the asylum seekers, saying that as they had left from Indonesia they either should go back to
that country or be taken to Norway. The government declared that as Australia was a sovereign state and had a right to protect its
borders it should be allowed to decide who could enter Australia. The world watched as the stand‐off lasted for 10 days. Eventually,
Nauru and New Zealand took the group of people.
10 Cam br i d g e Le g a l Stu di es – HS C
Detention in Sydney.
££ Immigration transit housing, which houses people who are low
The Migration Act 1958 (Cth) allows for the immediate detention of
security risk. There are facilities in Brisbane, Melbourne and
any person who is in Australia without a valid passport. This covers
Adelaide.
unauthorised arrivals, people who stay beyond the expiry of their
temporary visa and those who breach the conditions of their visa
(for example by working when the terms of their visa prohibit it).
Research 17.4
Between 1992 and 2008, asylum seekers who arrived in The majority of people held in detention centres have
Australia without a visa – both adults and children – were subject been Afghan, Iraqi, Iranian, Chinese, Indonesian, Sri Lankan,
to mandatory detention. For most, the detention ended only when Palestinian, Korean, Vietnamese and Bangladeshi.
they were recognised as refugees and granted a protection visa, Investigate one of these groups and find out what has
or when they were removed from the country. The government happened in their country of origin to make them leave,
how easy it has been to leave their country of origin, and the
brought in its detention policy in 1992 for the following reasons:
way they came to Australia.
££ It is easier to question a person about his or her application
if the person is kept in detention.
££ Applicants are less likely to become lost in the community
if they are detained during the application process. Review 17.6
££ It is easier to remove an unsuccessful applicant from a
1 Identify the circumstances under which a person can be
detention centre.
deported from Australia.
Between 2000 and 2008, the majority of people held in detention
centres were Afghan, Iraqi, Iranian, Chinese, Indonesian, Sri Lankan, 2 Write a definition of ‘extradition’. Under what
circumstances does extradition take place?
Palestinian, Korean, Vietnamese and Bangladeshi.
Although the current government retains detention centres 3 Which cultural groups make up most of the population
automatically detain asylum seekers who arrive without a visa. 4 What are the types of detention centres and where are
Instead, detention centres are mainly restricted to unlawful non- they located?
12 Cam br i d g e Le g a l Stu di es – HS C
Maribyrnong IDC 81 13 94 +8
Perth IDC 25 5 30 −1
People in Community under Residence Determination 902 623 1198 2723 + 521
1
Immigration detention as set out under s 189 or s 249 of the Migration Act 1958.
2
Includes detention in the community in private houses / correctional facilities / watch houses / hotels / apartments / foster care / hospitals
with a person designated under the Act.
Source: Department of Immigration and Citizenship
When people legally migrate to Australia, it is expected that they unlawful under the relevant parts of the federal Acts prohibiting
will be afforded the basic rights of all other Australian residents. discrimination on the basis of race, sex, age or disability. Migrants
In reality, however, this does not always happen. For a number of who believe they have suffered discrimination should contact
such as housing and social services. Many also find themselves If there is sufficient evidence that racial discrimination has
subject to unfair treatment because of their race, colour, descent, occurred, the Race Discrimination Commissioner will carry out an
national origin or ethnic origin. This behaviour can take the form of investigation. The Commissioner does not have the power to force
direct discrimination or indirect discrimination. people to stop their discriminatory behaviour and can only make
Under the International Convention on the Elimination of All recommendations and mediate to resolve disputes. If a dispute
Forms of Racial Discrimination, the government is obliged to stop cannot be resolved, it is referred to the Federal Court, which will
racist behaviour. State and federal governments have tried to make a legally binding decision and award compensation.
14 Cam br i d g e Le g a l Stu di es – HS C
Review 17.7
1 Write a definition of ‘racial discrimination’.
2 Distinguish between direct and indirect discrimination. Give examples of both, either in words or pictorially.
3 Outline the state and federal legislation that covers discrimination.
4 In what ways are migrants limited in their access to social security benefits? Do you think this is fair? Justify your answer.
5 What conditions must be satisfied before an individual in a particular country can take a claim of racial discrimination before the
UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination?
16 Cam br i d g e Le g a l Stu di es – HS C
18 Cam br i d g e Le g a l Stu di es – HS C
Review 17.9
1 Explain the system of review.
2 Discuss the limitations of the review process.
3 Describe the role played by the Federal Court of Australia in the review process.
4 Summarise the case SZKCQ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (see below). Was this a merits review or a judicial review
of the RRT decision?
Case Space
SZKCQ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCAFC 119
SZKCQ, a Pakistani national, claimed to fear persecution because of his membership of, and profile within, the Pakistani People’s
Party (PPP). He appealed in the Federal Court of Australia against a judgement of the Federal Magistrates’ Court, which had dismissed
an application for judicial review of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal. The Federal Magistrates’ Court had dismissed his
appeal on the basis that he was not a person to whom Australia had protection obligations.
At hearing, the RRT had asked the appellant, SZKCQ, to obtain confirmation from PPP officials of his standing and situation in the
party. On receiving two letters from officials, Mr A and Mr K, the Tribunal sent the documents to the Australian High Commission in
Islamabad, asking, among other things, for information from the letters’ authors as to how the appellant suffered as a result of his
work for the party. The Tribunal wrote to SZKCQ under s 424A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), stating that based on this information
it was not satisfied that he faced a real chance of harm and giving him 14 days to provide comments on the information. In the
Tribunal’s opinion the letter from Mr A was not genuine, and as Mr K made no reference to the appellant’s claim of imprisonment,
the evidence suggested he had exaggerated his role and the harassment he suffered. They wrote to the appellant of their decision
but the time between the date of the letter and the date it arrived was quite lengthy.
In his appeal SZKCQ contended, among other things, that the Tribunal had delayed the sending of its refusal by post so that he
did not have enough time to respond and had not ensured that he understood why the information referred to was relevant to the
review. The Federal Court judged that the Tribunal had failed to give enough time for the appellant to appeal the initial decision and
had not properly informed him. SZKCQ’s appeal was upheld and the RRT decision set aside.
20 Cam br i d g e Le g a l Stu di es – HS C
It is important to remember that the reason for keeping applicants as the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, HREOC undertook
in detention centres is as a form of immigration control and not as a National Inquiry into Children in Immigration Detention in
punishment. More recently, these detention centres have also been November 2001. Its report, A Last Resort, was released in 2004.
a way to encourage potential applicants to use legal channels to The inquiry found that Australian laws requiring the detention of
apply to live in Australia. However, there has been much criticism children have resulted in numerous and repeated breaches of the
both in Australia and internationally about the conditions in the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CROC), and that children so
detention centres and the government’s right to keep people in detained are at high risk of serious mental harm. It recommended
them for extended periods of time. the release of children and their parents, and the amendment
One criticism is that in practice, border applicants are more of Australia’s laws to comply with CROC. It also recommended
likely to be subjected to detention, whereas other unlawful non‐ that an independent guardian should be appointed for any
citizens such as overstayers are generally allowed to stay in the unaccompanied child, that minimum standards of treatment for
community while their applications to remain in Australia are children in detention should be codified in legislation, and that the
assessed. Another criticism is that only in certain circumstances amendments to the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) should be reviewed to
are bridging visas available to people in detention. They are only assess their impact on children.
granted to those people who have applied for refugee status, With increasing public protest and pressure, changes have
and then only for children, people over 75 years of age, spouses been slowly brought about, and the federal government elected
of Australians, and victims of trauma and torture. There have in 2007 has taken measures (and continues to) to rectify some of
also been criticisms relating to the fact that border applicants these issues.
who are detained only have the right to appeal to the Migration
Review Tribunal if they claim refugee status. In addition, people Review 17.10
in detention are often unaware of their legal rights. Although all
1 What criticisms of Australia’s detention policies have
people in detention must be given the opportunity to obtain legal
been made?
assistance upon request, they are not always informed of this right
by immigration officers. 2 What international convention was the benchmark
against which HREOC’s inquiry measured Australia’s
Many see detention as an abuse of human rights under
treatment of the children of border applicants?
international law. The UN Human Rights Committee has criticised
such things as the lack of review rights for those in detention. In
its decision in A v Australia (1997) CCPR/C/59/D/560/1993, the
Committee found that Australia had breached Article 9(4) of the Research 17.5
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (ICCPR).
What progress has been made on the issue of mandatory
Article 9(4) provides for the rights of people in detention to seek a
detention of border applicants and their children? Use a
determination on the legality of that detention without delay.
search engine to research news articles from 1 January 2008
Australia’s response to the Committee’s finding in this case to the present.
was to reject the findings, as well as the Committee’s view that
Key search terms could include various combinations of
compensation should be paid to Mr A. This response was criticised
the following keywords:
both nationally and internationally. In January 2008, in its annual
££ mandatory detention
inspection report of detention centres, HREOC (now known as The
££ Australia
Australian Human Rights Commission) stated that there had been
££ children
improvements, but there was still work to do.
££ asylum seekers
Australia has also been criticised for its detention of children of
££ human rights.
border applicants. From 1999, the number of children in detention
Many people are also dissatisfied with the outcome of racially discriminatory behaviour and racist speech
their complaint and believe that the remedies available are ££ increasing the availability of, and access to, legal aid for migrants
not strong enough to stop further discrimination or send a ££ providing greater access to social security for migrants
strong message to the public. The NSW legislation provides ££ providing greater access to legal assistance for people in
heavy fines and imprisonment, but these penalties are rarely detention and increased availability of review of immigration
used. The Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) has the decisions
power to make determinations, but is not empowered to make ££ streamlining application processes for migration so that they
them binding on the parties involved. However, the AHRC will are the same around the world
investigate and conciliate when a dispute exists to try to bring ££ reforming the rules regarding mandatory detention.
about a satisfactory resolution.
Difficulty in proving that the discrimination took place and
that the treatment was based on race also means that migrants
are reluctant to bring a complaint. Problems continue in the
elimination of racial discrimination because of limited government
authority and continued racist attitudes in the community, as well
as language barriers and migrants’ ignorance of their rights.
22 Cam br i d g e Le g a l Stu di es – HS C
includes the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) and the Anti‐ a an unsuccessful candidate being allowed to seek merits
Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW). review from the Migration Review Tribunal if his or her
application is rejected by DIAC
b an unsuccessful candidate being allowed to appeal to
the High Court if his or her application is rejected by the
Migration Review Tribunal
c an unsuccessful candidate being allowed to appeal to the
Federal Court if his or her application is rejected by DIAC
d an unsuccessful candidate being allowed to appeal to the
Migration Review Tribunal, but only on questions of law,
not merits
24 Cam br i d g e Le g a l Stu di es – HS C
➔➔ identify and apply legal concepts and terminology ➔➔ locate, select and organise legal information from a variety
➔➔ discuss the effectiveness of the legal system in of sources including legislation, cases, media reports,
addressing issues international instruments and documents
➔➔ provide an explanation of the nature of the relationship ➔➔ account for differing perspectives and interpretations of
between the legal system and society legal information and issues
➔➔ describe the role of law in encouraging cooperation and ➔➔ communicate legal information using well‐structured
resolving conflict, and in initiating and responding to change responses
Key terms/vocabulary
affirmative action dispossession native title reconciliation
assimilation equal opportunity nomadic treaty
dispersal martial law racial vilification
Relevant law
Important legislation
Australian Constitution section 51 National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 (NSW)
Australian Constitution section 127 Aboriginal Land Rights Act 1983 (NSW)
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Heritage Protection Act 1984 (Cth) Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW)
Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth)
Native Title Act Amendment Act 2007 (Cth) Northern Territory National Emergency Response Act 2007 (Cth)
Significant cases
Mabo v Queensland (No. 2) (1992) HCA 23 R v Williams (1976) 14 SASR 1
Wik Peoples and Others v The State of Queensland and Others Walker v NSW (1994) 69 ALJR 111
[1996] HCA 40
one, or uninhabited land). Why did the British have this belief about Australia?
A range of government policies and laws in relation to 3 Describe the three main policies of Australian
Indigenous peoples has been in place since 1788; these are governments in relation to Indigenous people from 1788
summarised in Table 18.1. The law-makers at this time believed to 1967. List one effect or outcome of each policy.
2 Cam br i d g e Le g al Studi es – HS C
1816 Martial Law (NSW) Aboriginal people could be shot on sight if armed with spears, or
1824 Martial Law (Tasmania) even if they were unarmed and within a certain distance of houses
or settlements.
Settlers were authorised to shoot Aboriginal people.
Vagrancy Act 1835 (NSW) Citizens could be sent to jail with hard labour for ‘lodging or
wandering in company with any of the black natives of the colony’.
Assimilation and integration (1900–1970s) The European majority attempted to teach the Indigenous
By this time, Indigenous populations were a long way from ‘dying population to be white. This was met with both submission and
out’, and the policy was to ‘Europeanise’ them. Leaving behind resistance. The 1967 referendum recognised that Aboriginal and
their language, culture, artefacts and traditions, and becoming Torres Strait Islanders should be counted in the census numbers
‘similar’ and ‘integrating’ into mainstream society. and transferred responsibility for Indigenous affairs to the federal
government.
18.2 The legal status of On 10 June 1838, they were brutally attacked and killed by stockmen
who were angry about the theft of their cattle. Twenty‐eight
Aboriginal and Torres Strait men, women and children were slaughtered, and the Governor of
Islander peoples before 1967 New South Wales ordered an investigation into the massacre. Such a
legal process was probably the first of its kind. Initially, 11 men were
The doctrine of terra nullius meant that in the eyes of the law, found not guilty of the crime. However, a second trial sent seven men
Indigenous Australians did not exist as citizens for hundreds of to their death by hanging. As a result of this event farmers perceived
years. The statements made by the Bulletin magazine and the Chief the message that if you did kill Aboriginal people, do not tell the
Protector of Aborigines highlight the legal status of Indigenous authorities and cover up any evidence; the result was that nearly all
people since 1788. There were no criminal laws for European people further massacres went unrecorded. In the ensuing years, Aboriginal
to abide by in terms of harming or killing Indigenous people and, people were seen as needing care and ‘guidance’ in decision making.
in the first 50 years or so, the government policy of dispossession State governments passed laws such as the Aboriginal Protection
and dispersal tended to condone violence. Indeed, martial law in Act 1869 (Vic) and the Aborigines Protection Act 1909 (NSW), which
both Tasmania and New South Wales allowed Aboriginal people to gave wide powers to govern where Aboriginal people could live
be shot and killed. One of the most significant and tragic events of and work, what jobs they could do and whom they could marry and
the 1800s occurred in New South Wales at Myall Creek, near Bingara. associate with. In New South Wales this also allowed for the removal
In May 1838, 40 Indigenous people set up camp on a cattle station. of children from homes to missions.
C hap ter 18: Ab or iginal and Tor res Strait Isl ander p eop l es 3
After the 1967 referendum significantly changed the legal status of Indigenous people in
relation to native title and allowed some people to access parcels
In 1968, Yolngu people from the Gove Peninsula, in eastern
of land throughout Australia to practise their traditional way of
Arnhem Land, sent a bark petition to the Commonwealth
life. It did not allow Indigenous people to ‘own’ these lands, as
Government protesting the removal of some 300 hectares of
this could mean restricting access to current owners. In December
land for bauxite mining without their permission. The petition
1993, during the passage of the Native Title Bill through parliament,
failed to move the federal government to recognise the rights of
Prime Minister Paul Keating said:
the Yolngu people and so the Gove land rights case (Milirrpum
... as a nation, we take a major step towards a new and better
v Nabalco Pty Ltd (1971) 17 FLR 141) commenced in the Northern
relationship between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australians.
Territory Supreme Court in 1971. In his ruling, Justice Blackburn
We give the Indigenous people of Australia, at last, the standing
stated that if the Yolngu people did have any type of native title they are owed as the original occupants of this continent, the
rights, they would have been extinguished under common law. standing they are owed as seminal contributors to our national
life and culture: as workers, soldiers, explorers, artists, sportsmen
Thus, the doctrine of terra nullius prevailed and they could not
and women – as a defining element in the character of this nation
prevent mining on the land.
– and the standing they are owed as victims of grave injustices, as
In 1972, the Australian Labor Party, led by Gough Whitlam, was people who have survived the loss of their land and the shattering
elected after 23 years in opposition. That year, the government of their culture.
4 Cam br i d g e Le g al Studi es – HS C
1 Describe the changing legal status of Aboriginal and ... the more fundamental causes for the over‐representation of
Torres Strait Islander peoples prior to 1967 and up to Aboriginal people in custody are not to be found in the criminal
justice system but in those factors which bring Aboriginal people
1993. Why do you think laws have changed?
into conflict with the criminal justice system in the first place.
2 Explain the importance of the 1992 Mabo decision for The view propounded by this report is that the most significant
the legal status of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander contributing factor is the disadvantaged and unequal position in
peoples. which Aboriginal people find themselves in the society – socially,
economically and culturally.
3 Evaluate the statement made by Prime Minister Paul
Keating in 1993 on the passing of the Native Title Bill. In the past few years, a range of measures and policies to counter
the statistics listed above have been put in place, including circle
sentencing, which tries to identify a more appropriate form of
Criminal law punishment, after an Aboriginal person has been found guilty in
ordinary court. While circle sentencing continues in Dubbo and
In the cases of R v Ballard (1829) and R v Murrell (1836), in which
Nowra, there are still criminal cases whereby Aboriginal people are
Indigenous men (Ballard and Murrell) were charged with murdering
not excused from the current criminal justice system of assigning
other Indigenous men, the defence counsel argued:
punishment.
The natives were not protected by the laws of Great Britain, they
were not admitted witnesses in Courts of Justice, they could
not claim any civil rights, they could not obtain recovery of, or Civil law
compensation for, those lands which had been torn from them, and
which they had held probably for centuries. It therefore followed Australia’s adversarial legal system means that taking civil action
they were not bound by laws which did not at the same time afford against another person or company can be an extremely costly
them protection. experience. The chances of winning a case with self‐representation
In both cases, the prisoners were dismissed. However, in the latter are extremely low and, as a consequence, very few Indigenous or
case, Justice Forbes reversed his decision and found the defendant non‐Indigenous people can afford to act as plaintiffs in civil cases.
guilty after consulting with three other judges. Throughout all of However, in 1996, as a result of the Mabo decision, the Wik people
the 20th century and into the 21st, Aboriginal and Torres Strait of Cape York challenged, in the High Court, the legality of pastoral
Islander people continue to be significantly over-represented leases or land formerly under pastoral leases.
in rates of arrest, charge and jail sentencing. It is estimated that The major difference between the Mabo and Wik cases was that
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are between nine and the Wik people were fighting against farmers who also felt they
15 times more likely to be arrested, charged and jailed for offences had legal rights and ownership. The High Court found in favour
commonly known as ‘the trifecta’ – offensive language/behaviour, of the Wik people. In a judgment known as ‘the Wik decision’ the
resisting arrest and assaulting police, and hindering police. Indeed, court found that native title could ‘coexist’ with pastoral leases.
in 2004, Aboriginal people (including people of Torres Strait This effectively meant that the Wik people could access their land
Islander descent) in New South Wales appeared in criminal courts for customary purposes and that this should not interfere with
four times more frequently than non‐Aboriginal people. In terms farmers or pastoralists. The court also determined that, should
of incarceration, 16 per cent of Aboriginal people who appeared in native title and pastoral leases come into conflict, the pastoralists’
court received jail sentences, compared to just 6 per cent of non‐ rights would prevail. The court explained that pastoralists had an
Aboriginal people. exclusive right to pasture, but not exclusive rights to possession
It has been estimated that if all Indigenous people who of the land. Following this judgment, the federal government
were sentenced to jail for fewer than six months were released, introduced the 10‐point plan for native title, with the Native Title
Indigenous jail population numbers would fall by 56 per cent over Amendment Act 1998 (Cth).
C hap ter 18: Ab or iginal and Tor res Strait Isl ander p eop l es 5
Islander peoples condition (16 per cent) than the non‐Indigenous population.
Indigenous people were three times more likely to report some
form of diabetes than non‐Indigenous Australians. In 2004–05,
The mechanisms and methods available to Aboriginal and Torres
the prevalence of hearing conditions for Indigenous children was
Strait Islander people in contemporary times will be examined.
three times higher than for non‐Indigenous children.
Land rights, native title, Australian law and Indigenous customary
law will be discussed within the context of legal, social and political
changes since 2000.
Education
School retention (2011) – 49 per cent of Indigenous students
££ Indigenous males: 67 years (compared to all Australian males: rate was 16 per cent).
78 years)
££ Indigenous females: 73 years (compared to all Australian Criminal justice system
females: 83 years) Juvenile detention (2008) – Indigenous young people aged 10 to
17 years were 23 times more likely than non‐Indigenous juveniles to
General health (2004–05)
be detained in a juvenile justice centre. (Source: Australian Human
Indigenous people were nearly twice as likely to report their health Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission.)
as ‘fair or poor’ (22 per cent) compared to non‐Indigenous people.
6 Cam br i d g e Le g al Studi es – HS C
2 Describe the differences in general health between 1 Choose three cases. Describe the events of each case and
Indigenous and non‐Indigenous people. the judge’s decision.
3 Discuss the reasons for the overall disadvantage differences 2 Evaluate the effectiveness of the law in dealing with
as outlined by Commissioner Elliot Johnston QC. racial vilification.
C hap ter 18: Ab or iginal and Tor res Strait Isl ander p eop l es 7
8 Cam br i d g e Le g al Studi es – HS C
Political power refers to the ability to influence and directly control Citizens who are Indigenous are bearers of a right to self‐
determination which cannot be honoured by putting in their hands
government policy. One of the most obvious ways to control and
merely those instruments of self-determination that were afforded
influence policy is to have Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders as to all Australian citizens through the Australian Constitution. That
Members of Parliament (MPs). is because Indigenous Australians were not parties to the federal
In 2003, Linda Burney became the Member for Canterbury in compact of 1901. Giving Indigenous Australians the vote since
federation cannot in itself redress their omission from the founding
New South Wales. She was the first Aboriginal Australian to be
processes of nationhood.
voted into the 158‐year‐old NSW Parliament. She became the To admit them as parties to nation building, it would be necessary
eleventh Aboriginal MP and only the fourth Indigenous woman to negotiate changes to the Constitution that acknowledge their
elected to any Australian parliament. collective interests in some way.
Another way of wielding political power is through bodies This should have been the main business of the Centenary [of
Federation] in 2001. Thus, some advocates of a treaty now argue for
such as the NSWALC and ATSIC. While ATSIC was an arm of the
constitutional recognition of an Indigenous order of government
federal government, it was able to determine a range of strategies, – the instrument of their self‐determination as a distinguishable
policies and programs for Indigenous communities. However, people within the Australian nation.
C hap ter 18: Ab or iginal and Tor res Strait Isl ander p eop l es 9
1 Clarify the difference between land rights and for at least 50 000 years and, prior to colonisation, there were
native title. approximately 500 different cultural and language groups. To
categorise Indigenous people into a single ethnic group would
2 Identify at least one problem for Indigenous
communities with the abolition of ATSIC. be similar to categorising Caucasian, Asian or Arab people into
one group. The European colonists did not grasp the concept that
3 Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of a treaty
there were significant differences between these groups in terms of
between the federal government and Indigenous
Australians. language, religion and culture.
There is evidence to suggest that not all Indigenous peoples were
nomadic. Some groups lived a sedentary lifestyle, with permanent
10 Cam br i d g e Le g a l Stu di es – HS C
Case Space
R v Williams (1976) 14 SASR 1
During the course of this criminal trial in South Australia, Justice custodial sentence if the prisoner returned to his lands for
Wells heard evidence that a woman taunted Mr Williams in customary punishment. The sentencing judge later gave
relation to customary secrets. They had been drinking together his reasons:
and an argument broke out between them, which led to the The fact was that he had very little English; it would have been
woman’s death at the hands of the accused. Mr Williams was impossible for him to have communicated with the staff of the
convicted of manslaughter. prison or with any fellow prisoners, or to have related to them
in any way ...
The court decided that the provocation by the woman
To condemn a tribal Aborigine to such a fate was something
was sufficient to reduce the murder charge to the lesser
which I wished, if possible, to avoid.
crime. Justice Wells decided against sentencing Williams
to imprisonment if he agreed to customary penalties dealt Williams was later speared through the legs as required by
by Aboriginal elders. Justice Wells ‘suspended’ a two‐year the elders.
C hap ter 18: Ab or iginal and Tor res Strait Isl ander p eop l es 11
12 Cam br i d g e Le g a l Stu di es – HS C
C hap ter 18: Ab or iginal and Tor res Strait Isl ander p eop l es 13
14 Cam br i d g e Le g a l Stu di es – HS C
C hap ter 18: Ab or iginal and Tor res Strait Isl ander p eop l es 15
16 Cam br i d g e Le g a l Stu di es – HS C
Chapter 1 Chapter 9
1a 2b 3c 4c 5c 1c 2c 3c 4c 5c
Chapter 2 Chapter 10
1a 2b 3c 4d 5c 1d 2c 3b 4d 5d
6 b and c 7a 8b 9 b and d 10 d
Chapter 11
Chapter 3
1c 2c 3b 4b 5a
1b 2b 3a 4a 5c
Chapter 12
Chapter 4
1b 2d 3c 4c 5d
1c 2b 3b 4b 5c
Chapter 13
Chapter 5
1c 2a 3b 4d 5a
Topic 1 – 1 a 2b 3b 4a 5b
Topic 2 – 1 c 2d 3b 4b 5d Chapter 14
Topic 3 – 1 d 2a 3c 4b 5b
1a 2c 3a 4d 5d
Chapter 15
Part II
1c 2c 3a 4d 5b
Chapter 6
Chapter 16
1c 2a 3c 4c 5d
1c 2b 3d 4b 5d
Chapter 7
1b 2a 3c 4c 5a
Chapter 8
1b 2b 3d 4b 5d
9/11 a term used to describe the terrorist attacks in the apprehended violence orders court orders to protect a
United States on 11 September 2001; otherwise known as person who fears violence or harassment from a particular
‘September 11’ person. In NSW, ‘apprehended personal violence orders’
access the right or opportunity to make use of something prohibit violence between members of the public;
‘apprehended domestic violence orders’ prohibit violence in
Act of Parliament statute law, resulting from a bill
the context of a family.
successfully passing through parliament and gaining
royal assent arbitration a form of alternative dispute resolution in which
the disputing parties present their cases before an arbitrator,
adoption order a court order that establishes a new legal
who makes a decision that is binding on the parties
relationship between potential adoptive parents and a child
eligible for adoption. It also severs the legal relationship that assimilation a policy based on the idea that the minority
existed between the adoptive child and his or her natural group should adopt the language and traditions of the
adversarial system a system of resolving legal conflicts, asylum seeker someone who has fled his or her own country
used in common law countries such as England and Australia, and applies to the government of another country for
that relies on the skill of representatives for each side protection as a refugee
(e.g. defence and prosecution lawyers) who present their ATSIC (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission)
cases to an impartial decision-maker a legal branch designed to help Aboriginal and Torres Strait
affirmative action a policy designed to address past Islanders with the legal system, which was shut down in 2005
discrimination and thus improve the economic and Australian Federal Police (AFP) the federal police agency
educational opportunities of women and minority groups of the Commonwealth of Australia, set up to enforce the
Al Qaeda an international Islamic extremist group, federal laws and to protect the interests of Australia both
responsible for attacks on military and civilian targets in domestically and internationally
various countries, the most notable being the attacks on balance of power the power held by the political party
the United States on September 11 whose vote is needed to pass legislation; usually determined
alternative dispute resolution dispute resolution processes, in the upper house of parliament under the Westminster
such as mediation, arbitration and conciliation, that do not system of government
involve courts balance of probabilities the standard of proof required in a
anarchy the absence of laws and government civil case in order for a plaintiff to succeed in proving the case
lower court’s decision, on the basis of an error of law beyond reasonable doubt the standard of proof required
appellate jurisdiction the ability or power of a court to hear in a criminal case in order for the prosecution (the state) to
appeals of the decisions of lower courts and to reject, affirm obtain a conviction against the accused
Apprehended Domestic Violence Order (ADVO) a court bill a drafted law that has not yet been passed by parliament
order used for the protection of a person involved in an bill of rights a statement of basic human rights and priveleges
intimate, spousal or de facto relationship
bipartisan having the support of the two major political parties
bookmaking the activity of calculating odds on sporting and Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (CDPP)
other events and taking bets independent prosecuting agency established by a federal Act
bridging visa a permit to stay in Australia for a temporary to prosecute alleged offences under federal laws
Glossary
period of time so that arrangements can be made either to complainant a person alleging that a sexual assault has been
leave or to apply for permanent residency committed against him or her
burden of proof the responsibility of a party to prove a case conciliation a form of alternative dispute resolution in
in court which the disputing parties use the services of a conciliator,
capital punishment the practice of sentencing a person who takes an active role, advising the parties, suggesting
to death by judicial process; also referred to as the ‘death alternatives and encouraging the parties to reach agreement.
penalty’ The conciliator does not make the decision for them
cautions formal notices given to young offenders where the concurrent powers existing at the same time; powers held
offence is more serious than one appropriately dealt with by by both state and federal parliaments
Central intelligence Agency the spy agency of the United who is able to understand and make a decision about the
States, responsible for gathering national security intelligence matter to which he or she agrees
chapter a local branch of a motorcycle club conspiracy theories speculation that there is a cover-
up of the information surrounding a significant event by
children generally persons aged 15 years and younger,
government or other authorities
depending on the legal context
contempt of court words or actions that show a disregard
civil jurisdiction the power of a court to hear matters
for the authority of the court or interfere with its powers
involving disputes between private individuals, and to award
civil remedies control order an order made by a court, government official
or police officer to restrict an individual’s liberty: for example,
civil liberties basic individual rights, such as freedom of
from doing a specified act or being in a specified place
speech and religion, which are protected by law
conveyancers people who deal professionally with the legal
civil litigation court action brought to remedy a wrong or
and practical matters involved in the transfer of titles to
breach of contract sport law
property when real estate is sold and purchased
class actions legal proceedings taken by many individuals
copyright an exclusive right to publish, copy, publicly
against the same defendant, arising out of the same cause
perform, broadcast, or make an adaptation of certain forms
coercive powers special powers sometimes given to a of expression, namely sounds, words or visual images
commission or police task force that allow it to summon any
copyright infringement the unauthorised use of copyright
witness to give evidence or produce any documents – these
material in a manner that violates the owner’s rights
powers are usually only vested in courts
copyright notice a notice added to a work to inform people
colours a motor cycle club’s standard vest showing the club’s
of who owns the copyright and when the copyright was
patches on the back as a mark of identification
created, e.g. ‘© Random Business Pty Ltd 2011’
committal hearings inquiries held in the Local or
coronial inquests investigations into deaths that have
Magistrate’s Court to determine whether there is enough
occurred in unusual circumstances, held in the Coroner’s
evidence against the defendant to warrant a trial in a higher
Court and overseen by a magistrate called the Coroner
court (this is called establishing a prima facie case)
corporal punishment the physical punishment of people,
especially of children, by hitting them
Gl ossa r y 335
courts of equity historically, courts whose decisions were digital piracy unauthorised reproduction and distribution of
more discretionary and based on moral principles, and which digital music, software, videos or other material, often for profit
served as an antidote to the inflexibility of the common law direct discrimination a practice or policy of treating a person
credibility reliability, believability or group of people less favourably than another person or
cross-examination questioning of a witness called by the group in the same position, on the basis of sex, race, national
other side, to produce information relevant to one’s case or to or ethnic origin, age, sexuality or other characteristic
call the witness’s credibility into question disinhibition effect the tendency to say and do things in
customary law principles and procedures that have cyberspace that the person would not ordinarily say or do in
developed through general usage according to the customs the face-to-face world
customs collective habits or traditions that have developed dispossession the removal or expulsion of people from their
in a society over a long period of time traditional lands
cyberbullying harassment using digital media such as doli incapax Latin term meaning ‘incapable of wrong’; the
websites, email, chat rooms, social networking pages or presumption that a child under 10 years of age cannot be
instant messaging held legally responsible for his or her actions and cannot be
communication occurs; the culture of the internet domestic law the law of a state
cyberstalking repeated harassment using email, text download to receive data from a central system to one’s
messaging or other digital media with the intention of own, local network or computer
causing fear or intimidation draconian laws laws that are excessively harsh or severe –
damages monetary compensation for harm or loss suffered from Draco, a Greek legislator (7th century BCE) whose laws
declarations formal statements of a party’s position on a imposed cruel and severe penalties for crimes
particular issue; a declaration is not legally binding under Dreaming, The the source of Indigenous Australian
international law customary law
de facto relationship (from the Latin term meaning ‘existing elders older men and women of recognised wisdom and
in fact’): a relationship between two adults who are not authority, who are the keepers of traditional knowledge
married but are living together as a couple within Indigenous communities; they are responsible for such
defamation the act of making statements or suggestions things as initiations and the handing down of punishments
that harm someone’s reputation in the community when community laws are broken
defendant the person who is accused of a crime or a civil employment contract a contract between an employer and
wrong; in a criminal case, the defendant is also referred to as employee(s) which sets out matters including the pay, hours,
digital copyright copyright as it applies to digital media equal opportunity the right to equivalent opportunities
regardless of race, colour, sex, national origin, etc.
Glossary
estate all of the property that a person leaves upon death foundling a deserted infant whose parents’ identity is
ethics (1) rules or standards governing the conduct of a unknown
person or the members of a profession; (2) a major branch of freedom of information (FOI) the principle that people
philosophy, which investigates the nature of values and of should be able to have access to information relating to
right and wrong conduct the administration of government decision-making and
ex parte (Latin) ‘from one side’; in a case this means the other information held by the government. FOI legislation governs
side is absent or unrepresented the process of obtaining this information, at state and
barrister who called that witness fraud a dishonest act, done intentionally in order to deceive.
exclusive powers powers that can be exercised only by the gender segregation the separation of people according to
Federal Parliament their gender
express consent consent given directly, either orally or General Assembly the main body of the United Nations,
in writing made up of all of the member states
external affairs power the power of the Commonwealth glass ceiling an invisible barrier that prevents women from
to legislate on international matters involving Australia; rising in an organisation through promotion; on the face of it,
interpreted by the High Court to mean that when the a company may not directly discriminate, but subtle practices
Commonwealth signs an international treaty or convention may still discourage women or prevent them from being
it has the authority to enact laws to give effect to this promoted to more responsible and better paid positions
international law within Australia guarantor a person who gives a formal promise that
extortion obtaining money or property from a person or someone else’s contract will be fulfilled, often backed by some
group by force, intimidation or illegal power form of asset that will stand as collateral to secure the promise
extradition the handing over of a person accused of a crime guilt by association criminal liability imposed for associating
by the authorities of the country where he or she has taken with another person who commits a crime, rather than for
refuge, to the authorities of the country where the crime was committing that crime oneself
committed half-caste whose parents are of different race and/or culture.
fairness freedom from bias, dishonesty, or injustice; a In the past in Australia, this reference was made to people
concept commonly related to everyday activities who had one European parent and one Aboriginal parent. It
federation the process of uniting several states to form was often used in a derogatory way.
feminism the advocacy of rights for women on the basis of parliamentary inquiries; named for English printer T. C.
the equality of men and women; there are many varieties of Hansard (1776–1833), who first printed a parliamentary
file-sharing the practice of distributing electronically harmonisation agreement among the laws of different
video files, especially through the use of peer-to-peer (P2P) homicide the act of killing another human being
networks
Gl ossa r y 337
identity theft obtaining or using the identity of another of the Islamic religion that sanctions the use of violence to
usually to obtain financial gain Jemaah Islamiyah a radical Islamic organisation that has
illicit drug also called an illegal drug; a drug that is links with Al Qaeda
prohibited by law jihad in Islam, a term meaning ‘struggle’; used without any
implied rights civil and political rights that can be inferred qualifiers it is generally understood in the West to refer to a
from the Constitution, rather than being expressly stated ‘holy war’ on behalf of Islam
in camera (Latin) privately; only specified persons such as the jurisdiction the powers of a court, depending on its
judge can be present during the testimony or proceeding geographic area, the type of matters that can be decided,
and the type of remedies that can be sought
indictable offence a serious criminal offence that requires
an indictment (a formal, written charge) and a preliminary jury a group of people who listen to all of the evidence in a
hearing; indictable offences typically tried before a judge and court case and decide on the verdict
jury and are subject to a greater penalty justice the legal principle of upholding generally accepted
indictment information presented for the prosecution of one rights and enforcing responsibilities, ensuring that equal
or more criminal offences; a formal written charge outcomes are achieved for those involved
indirect discrimination practices or policies that appear to juvenile a child or young person, generally under 18 years of
be neutral or fair because they treat everyone in the same age, although this may vary depending on the context
way, but which adversely affect a higher proportion of people kinship family relationships, including all extended family
from one particular group relationships; an important part of indigenous cultures and
information privacy protection against inappropriate values, which dictate how all people in the group behave
handling of a person’s personal information, with rules for the toward each other
collection and handling of personal data and records laissez-faire a French word literally translated as ‘allow to do’,
injunction a court order requiring an individual or used to describe economic philosophies that government
organisation to perform, or (more commonly) not to perform should not intervene in business; may also be used in a
conducting the trial and determining what questions to ask; permanently deprive the owner of the property; also known
to common law systems law a set of rules imposed on all members of a community
intellectual property intangible property that has which are officially recognised, binding and enforceable by
commercial value and can be protected by law, e.g. text, persons or organisations such as the police and/or courts
images, designs, inventions and computer programs law enforcement agencies those bodies that have the role
internet a global network of interconnected computer of enforcing the law; they are created by Acts of Parliament
networks that allows users to obtain and share information and include the police and some government departments
in a number of ways legal drug a drug that is not prohibited under the law,
internet piracy unauthorised downloading or distribution although some other restrictions may apply
of copyrighted material by means of the internet legal system the system of courts, prosecutors and police
customers access to the internet legislative powers the legal power or capacity to make laws
mandamus court order compelling a government official or identities with the aim of enticing their victims into harmful
martial law law enforced by the military over civilian affairs; onus the burden or duty of proving the case to the court
Glossary
overrides civil law opened for signature (of a treaty) having negotiations
massacre the intentional killing of a large number of people concluded and ready for parties’ signatures. Many treaties,
Gl ossa r y 339
plaintiff the person who initiates a civil action of government itself (e.g. criminal, administrative, and
constitutional law)
pleadings written statements of the parties to a civil dispute
that set out the issues to be decided by the court public morality standards of behaviour generally agreed
upon by the community
political autonomy self-determination, independence
public space areas set aside in which members of the
poverty line the minimum level of income needed to meet
community can associate and assemble
basic necessities and below which a household is defined as
poor; the poverty line is different in different countries question of law a disputed legal contention that is left for the
judge to decide (e.g. whether certain evidence is admissible)
precedent a judgement that is authority for a legal principle,
and that serves to provide guidance for deciding cases that R ‘r’ at the beginning of a case name refers to Regina (Latin
have similar facts for ‘Queen’). Since Australia is a constitutional monarchy this
refers to our head of state, on whose behalf the prosecution
prescription drug a type of legal drug that can be obtained
case is run. When the head of state is a male, as was the case
only by a doctor’s prescription
in 1935, the ‘R’ stands for Rex, which is Latin for ‘King’.
prima facie (Latin) ‘on the face’; at first sight: having sufficient
racial hatred abuse or denigration of a person because of his
evidence established against a defendant to warrant a trial in
or her race, or verbal abuse or denigration of a race generally
a higher court of law
racial vilification a public act based on the race, colour,
privacy a person’s right to be free from unwanted intrusion
national or ethnic origin of a person or group of people
or public scrutiny
which is likely to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate; types
private law the body of law governing relationships between of behaviour can include racist graffiti, speeches, posters or
individuals (e.g. contract law, torts, family law and property law) abuse in public
pro bono Latin term meaning ‘for the public good’, used rail gauge the distance between the inner sides of the two
to describe work that is done by a lawyer or barrister rails of a train
on a voluntary basis and without payment, where there
ratify to formally confirm that the country intends to be
are issues of community concern or significant effect on
bound by the treaty
disadvantaged groups
ratio decidendi (Latin) the legal reason for a judge’s decision
procedural fairness / natural justice the body of principles
used to ensure the fairness and justice of the decision-making reckless able to foresee negative consequences of doing
procedures of courts; in Australia it generally refers to the something, but carrying on with the act regardless.
right to know the case against you and to present your case, Recklessness implies a state of mind that is not as strong as
the right to freedom from bias by decision-makers, and the an intention to do something, but for some criminal offences
right to a decision based on relevant evidence it is considered equivalent to intention for the purpose of
establishing fault.
prohibited person a person prohibited from working in
child-related employment because of a conviction of a reconciliation getting two parties to correspond, or
violence towards a child referendum the referral of a particular issue to the electorate
prohibition a court order that forbids a lower level court for a vote
from hearing or taking further action in a case or matter remand the keeping of an accused in custody pending and/
prosecutor the person formally conducting legal or during his or her trial
Glossary
responsibilities legal or moral obligations to others portable player
rights legal or moral entitlements or permissions special leave where the High Court grants approval for the
case to come before it in its appellate jurisdiction
rule of law the principle that no one is above the law;
the most important application of the rule of law is that specific performance an order requiring the defendant
governmental authority is exercised in accordance with to perform the acts that the contract obliged him or her
enforced in accordance with established procedural steps sponsorship the support of an individual, event, or
(due process) organisation financially or through the provision of products
s abbreviation for ‘section’ of any legislation; ‘ss’ is the order for the plaintiff (in a civil case) or the prosecution (in a
sanction a penalty imposed on those who break the law, stare decisis Latin term meaning ‘the decision stands’; the
usually in the form of a fine or punishment doctrine that a decision must be followed by all lower courts
Security Council the arm of the United Nations responsible state a politically independent country
for maintaining world peace and security state police law enforcement agencies with statewide
urging others to use force against the government statute law law made by parliament
self-determination the right to determine one’s own acts suicide the intentional taking of one’s own life
without external influence; the freedom of the people of summary offences criminal offences that can be dealt
a given territory to determine their own political status or with by a single judge without a jury and do not require a
independence from their current state preliminary hearing
self-executing (of a treaty) automatically becoming superpower a country that has a dominant role in world
binding on a state party to the treaty as soon as the treaty politics and possesses military power in excess of other
has been ratified nations. At the end of World War II (1945), the United States
separation of powers the doctrine that the powers and and the USSR were known as ‘superpowers’ because of their
functions of the judiciary are separate from those of the huge armies and nuclear arsenals.
legislature and the executive surety a sum of money provided to support an accused
sexual assault a general term for criminal offences involving person’s undertaking that he or she will return to court for
unwanted sexual contact; acts include unwanted touching or hearing at a later date, as a condition of granting bail; it is
groping, indecent acts of other kinds, and rape agreed that the money will be forfeited if the accused fails
such as sexual advances, suggestive comments, unwanted table to place on the table for discussion
touching, written communication or gestures, especially in tariff a tax that must be paid on imports or exports
the workplace
task force a special group or committee of experts formed
for the express purpose of studying a particular problem
Gl ossa r y 341
tortious wrongful; constituting a tort or breach of duty ‘working with children check’ a check by the NSW
to others Commission for Children and Young People on the
torts civil wrongs involving breach of a duty; torts include appropriateness of a person in NSW to work in child-related
goods or land World Wide Web a system of documents that are accessible
trademarks words, names, symbols, devices or any on the internet and that are connected to each other
combination of these, used to identify and distinguish the through hyperlinks the user can click on to be taken to
goods or services of one company from those of another another location. The World Wide Web is not the same thing
as the internet.
treaty an international agreement concluded between
states in written form and governed by the guidelines young people in NSW, persons aged 16–18 years
of international law; treaties may also be referred to as Youth Justice Conferences meetings of all the people who
conventions or covenants may be affected by a crime committed by a young offender;
trespass to the person a tort involving direct contact with a used to help them to accept responsibility for their actions
person’s body without that person’s consent while avoiding the court system
Index
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Heritage Protection Act 1984 Australian High Tech Crime Centre (AHTCC) 147
(Cth) 104 Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) 109, 158, 211
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples Australian Industrial Relations Commission (AIRC) 320
customary laws 7, 44–7, 140 Australian law, relevance to international law 55
dispute resolution 46 Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) 85, 113, 171
diversity 45 Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) 147
enforcement and sanctions 46 Australian Sports Commission (ASC) 110
legal status 98 Australian Tax Office (ATO) 147–8
relevance of customary law 46–7
rights 140 balance of power 88
ritual and oral traditions 45 balance of probabilities 65, 193
significance of land and water bodies 46 Bali bombings 224–37, 257
spiritual nature 44 Indonesian and Australian relations 229
and terra nullius 44, 94, 97, 101 legal responses 230–1
see also native title non-legal responses 232–3
Aboriginal Land Rights Act 1983 (NSW) 103 barristers 71
Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976 (Cth) 99 beyond reasonable doubt 65
access 11 BHP Iron Ore Pty Ltd v Construction, Mining, Energy, Timberyards,
Act of Parliament 30 Sawmills and Woodworkers Union of Australia (WA Branch) [1998]
Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) 42 WA IR Comm 130 321
Administrative Decisions Tribunal (ADT) 61, 154, 194, 211 bicameral 28
administrative law 61 bilateral treaties 49
administrative tribunals 154 bill of rights 130–2
adversarial system of trial 20 bills (parliament) 29, 31
alternative dispute resolution 149–10 binding precedent 23
American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) 173 breach of contract 106
anarchy 14–15 Builders Labourers Federation 152
Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) 111, 155, 205, 211–12 burden of proof 67, 69
Anti-Discrimination Board of NSW (ADB) 155–6
anti-discrimination legislation 216–18 capital punishment 78
anti-terrorism campaigns 232, 236 censorship 169–70
anti-terrorism laws 262 Cesan v The Queen; Mas Rivadavia v the Queen [2008] HCA 52 19
appeals 24 child executions 50
appellate jurisdiction 26 child protection 172–4
Apprehended Domestic Violence Order (ADVO) 80 children 186–98
Apprehended Violence Orders (AVO) 144 and civil law 188–90
arbitration 149–10 and criminal justice system 196–8
athletes, drug testing 315–16 and criminal law 191
Australia Act 1986 (Cth) 40 discrimination 190
Australia’s legal heritage 20 education 189
Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd international issues 198
[2001] HCA 63 171 and the law 186–91, 195–8
Australian Citizenship Act 2007 (Cth) 189 and medical treatment 189
Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) 166 registration and citizenship 188
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission 165 rights of 187–8, 192–5
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Chen [2002] Children’s Court 25, 193
FCA 1248 165 hearings 67–8
Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) 153, 194 circle sentencing 140
Australian Crime Commission (ACC) 146 civil cases 69
I ndex 343
Index
disinhibition effect 169 gender segregation 215
dispute resolution 144–58 General Assembly (UN) 52
alternative 149–50 Geneva Convention 49
individuals 148–51 genocide 48, 49
law enforcement agencies 144–8 Gillard government 77
legal methods of challenging power 154–8 Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Health Authority [1985] 3 All
state 151–7 ER 402 187–8
District Court of New South Wales 26 Glasgow International Airport attack 258
doli incapax 10, 186 glass ceiling 215
domestic law 48–9, 210 global terrorism 224, 232–3
domestic violence 43, 80–1 ‘Gove land rights case’ (Milirrpum v Nabalco Pty Ltd (1971) 17
Donoghue v Stevenson (1932) AC 562 64, 129 FLR 141 98
download 290, 302–3 Griffiths, Hew Raymond 298, 299
Dreamtime 44 gun law reform 247–8, 249–50
drug testing 306–21 Gutnick v Dow Jones & Co. Inc. [2001] VSC 305 24
duty of care 64, 107, 112, 129, 316
hacking 164–5
East Timor 140, 231 Hansard 86
education 189, 205–6 harmonisation 85
employees’ rights 313–14, 317–18 Health Records and Information Privacy Act 2002 (NSW) 154
employers’ rights 317–18 Heaven v Pender (1883) 11 QBD 503 64
Equal Opportunity Act 1995 (Vic) 108 Hells Angels 276
Equal Opportunity for Women in the Workplace Act 1999 (Cth) 212 High Court of Australia 25, 27
equal opportunity in sport 108–9, 112 appeals from lower courts 42
equality 10 influence on Constitution 40–2
equity, development of 22 jurisdiction 39–40
estate 77 and native title 101–3
ethics 8, 9 role of 39–40
European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) 51 House of Representatives 29
European Union 131, 176 Howard, John 152, 248, 251, 264
euthanasia 129, 173 Howard government 104, 173, 250, 252, 270
examination in chief 66 human rights 50, 51, 55, 139, 209
exclusive powers 33–4 Human Rights Act 2004 (ACT) 55
express consent 107 Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986 (Cth) 158
external affairs power 36 hung jury 85
external reviews 154–5 identity theft 84
extortion 272 Independent Commission against Corruption (ICAC) 156
indictable offences 24, 107, 191
fairness 10–11 indictment 244
procedural 11 Indigenous Australians see Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
Family Court of Australia 27 peoples
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) 55, 77 Indigenous people, rights of 140
Federal Court of Australia 27 Indigenous women 209
federal courts 25, 26–7 individuals, disputes between 148–10
Federal Magistrates Court of Australia 26–7 Indonesian and Australian relations 229, 230
Federation 32, 33 Inglis, Greg 105
feminism 204 injunctions 39, 62
file-sharing 290–303 inquisitorial system 20
firearms 80, 144, 146, 154, 249–50, 251, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280 intellectual property 63, 165, 290, 292
I ndex 345
Index
Murphyores v The Commonwealth (‘Fraser Island case’) [1976] federal 145
HCA 20 41 state 144
political autonomy 140
National Native Title Tribunal (NTT) 103 Port Arthur massacre 240–51
National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 (NSW) 103 poverty line 207
native title precedent
as a collective right 104 doctrine of 22–3
definition 94 making and following 23
development 98–9 rules of 23
and High Court 101–3 prima facie 70
history of government policy 94–6 privacy 169–71, 317
and law reform 94–104 Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) 154, 171
legislation 103–4 Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (NSW) 154
Mabo cases 94, 99, 101, 103, 104 privacy bodies 154
Northern Territory claims 98–9 private law 60, 62
operation of legal system 97–103 procedural fairness 11, 42
policy/law 95 prohibited person 193
Wik case 102, 103 prohibition 39
Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) 101, 102, 103, 104 property law 63
natural justice 11, 42 Property (Relationships) Act 1984 (NSW) 77
negligence 129 public law 60–2
negotiation 149 public morality 76
New Zealand 130, 131
non-English speaking women 207–8 R v Brislan; Ex parte Williams [1935] HCA 78 41
non-government organisations (NGOs) 54, 87, 153, 215, 320 Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) 99, 113, 129, 170
NSW Bar Association 115 racial hatred 170
NSW Commission for Children and Young People 192 rail gauges 33
NSW Law Reform Commission 85–6, 109–10 ratification 49
NSW Rape Crisis Centre 115 ratio decidendi 23
referendums 32
obiter dicta 23, 43 remand 244
ombudsman 155, 156, 194 Reno v American Civil Liberties Union 521 US 844 (1997) 172
online predators 170 residual powers 34
opinio juris sive necessitatis 49 responsibilities
organised crime 273, 276–7 definition 128
original jurisdiction 39 individual, in relation to the state 133–8
Osland v R [1998] HCA 75 42, 43 legal basis of 129
outlaw motorcycle gangs (OMCGs) 272–85 rights 128–40
bill of 130–2
parliament(s) in cyberspace 174–5
and law reform 88–9 definition 128
members 152 implied 136
and native title 101 Indigenous people, rights of 140
role and structure 28–9 individual, nature of 129–32
and sexual assault 116–17 individual, in relation to the state 133–8
and sport 111–12 international protection of 138–40
parliamentary committees 86 interventionist approach 174–5
patents 167, 169 legal basis of 128–9
peer-to-peer (P2P) networks 291 moral vs legal 129–30
see also human rights
I ndex 347
values 9
vicarious liability 107
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969) 49
Index
warnings 191
Whistleblowers Australia (WBA) 152
White Australia policy 33
Whitlam, Gough 99
Wik case 102, 103
witness 71
women 202–20
achieving justice 209–18
anti-discrimination legislation 217–18
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination
Against Women (CEDAW) 55, 158, 209
domestic responses 217–18
and domestic violence 43, 80–1
education and training 205–6
historical roles and attitudes 204–5
Indigenous 209
international responses 215–16
and the law 204–9
legal responses 209–13
non-English speaking backgrounds 207–8
non-legal responses 214–15
social security 207
workforce participation 205–6
work and children 189
Work Choices legislation 89
workforce participation 205–6
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) 176
World Trade Organization (WTO) 176
World Wide Web 173
I ndex 349