Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
a) find the point estimate and the 95% confidence interval estimate of the mean scores in the
pretest of the population of students. Interpret your answer.
Descriptive statistics
Std.Error
N minimum maximum Mean Mean
score 9 38 81 56.44 4.540
One-Sample Statistics
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 0
95% Confidence Interval of the
Difference
t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference Lower Upper
score 12.432 8 .000 56.444 45.97 66.91
b. Test whether the mean scores of the population is less than 70 at 0.01 level of singnificant.
16
One-Sample Statistics
Std. Error
N Mean Std. Deviation Mean
score 9 56.4444 13.62086 4.54029
One-Sample Test
c. Test at 5% significance level whether this special course makes any statistically significant
improvement in the memory retention ability of the population of students.
16
(5 marks)
d. Construct a 95% confidence interval for mean difference of the scores of the students before
and after the memory improvement course
(3 marks)
c)
Std. Error
N Mean Std. Deviation Mean
SCORE 9 61.3333 15.64449 5.21483
d)
16
Paired Sample Statistic
N Correlation Sig.
Pair 1 BEFORE 9 61.3333 .000
AFTER
Paired differences
16
initial level of memory retention (PreTestLevel) are given in File memory.sav. Use the data
given in the file to form four improvement levels of memory retention (PerformanceLevel) as
follows:
PerformanceLevel 4 if PerformanceScore 8
e) How many students belong to each initial level of memory retention? Then, present this
information using a suitable graphical description.
(4 marks)
f) Is the initial level of memory retention related to the level of improvement of memory
retention? Test at 5% significance level.
(5 marks)
e)
16
Between –Subject Factors
N
Pre Test Level 1.00 78
2.00 110
3.00 73
4.00 56
Pre TestLevel
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1.00 78 24.6 24.6 24.6
2.00 110 34.7 34.7 59.3
3.00 73 23.0 23.0 82.3
4.00 56 17.7 17.7 100.0
Total 317 100.0 100.0
f) Is the initial level of memory retention related to the level of improvement of memory
retention? Test at 5% significance level.
16
(5 marks)
g) Determine whether there is significant difference in the mean of performance scores of the
methods at 5% significance level.
16
(5 marks)
ANOVA
MemoryImprove
h) Is thereva different effect on performance scores between Method 2 and Method 3? Discuss
the effect on performance scores of the methods. (Use 5% significance level)
16
(5 marks)
Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: MemoryImprove
Bonferroni
(I) time (Binned) (J) time (Binned) Mean Difference 95% Confidence Interval
(I-J) Std. Error Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound
1
2a) List down the value of the mean and standard deviation of time-length of self-treatment for
age, where age can be group as
16
Compare the means of age group.
Group Statistics
age group N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
time 1.00 107 23.25 13.062 1.263
2.00 338 29.11 19.961 1.086
c. Give a comment on the means regarding to your answer in (a) and (b).
16
d. obtain the 95% confidence interval for the means difference in time-length of self-treatment
between age group. Interpret the obtained value.
ANOVA
age
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 3055.760 2 1527.880 23.810 .000
Within Groups 28362.568 442 64.169
Total 31418.328 444
e. Related your result in (b) and (d). Does you result in (d) support the answer in (b)? What
is your reason?
16
f. Code the time-length of self-treatment (timegroup) as
Thus, determine whether there is enough evidence to conclude that there is significant difference
in the mean age between different categories of time-length of self-treatment. Check the equality
of the variances assumption and do the necessary multiple comparison tests if applicable.
Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Age
Bonferroni
(I) time group (J)timegroup Mean Difference 95% Confidence Interval
(I-J) Std. Error Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound
1.00 11 - 50
dimension3
2.801 1.312 .100 -.35 5.95
>50 -4.357* 1.563 .017 -8.11 -.60
2.00 <=10
dimension3
-2.801 1.312 .100 -5.95 .35
>50 -7.158* 1.053 .000 -9.69 -4.63
*
3.00 <=10
dimension3
4.357 1.563 .017 .60 8.11
11 - 50 7.158* 1.053 .000 4.63 9.69
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.
g. From the past studies, the research believes that the average of blood sugar reading was at
most 5 mmo1/L. Test the claim.
16
One-Sample Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
blood_sugar 445 5.69 3.202 .152
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 30
95% Confidence Interval of the
Difference
t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference Lower Upper
Blood_sugar 4.545 444 .000 .690 .39 .99
Test whether the blood sugar reading (blood_sugar group) are equally likely distributed.
16
bsugargrp
Test Statistic
bsugargrp
Chi- Squareª 247.528
Df 2
Asymp.Sig. .000
I. Is there enough evidence to conclude that the blood pressure (bpressgrp) is related to the
blood sugar reading (bsugargrp)?
16
Case Processing Summary
Cases
count
bsugargrp
hypertension 0 0 20 20
16
Chi- Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-square 890.000ª 4 .000
Likelihood Ratio 694.502 4 .000
Linear-by-Linear 444.000 1 .000
Association
N of Valid Cases 445
a. 1 cells (11.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .
90.
j. Another experiment using completely Random Block design to study the effect of time length
of self-treatment on systolic blood pressure with the existence of gender as block has been done.
The result of systolic reading are given in the following table:
16
Systolic pressure Reading
Time-length of
self-treatment (in
minutes/ day)
0- 31- >
31 60 30
Between-Subject Factors
N
Gender 1.00 3
2.00 3
Timelenght 1.00 2
2.00 2
3.00 2
16
REFERENCE
16
Fathilah Binti Mohd Alipiah , Rohaiza Binti Zakaria (2010). Applied Statistic. By The McGraw-
Hill Companies
Yuhaniz Haji Ahmad, Shamshuritawati Sharif, Zahayu Md. Yusof (2010). SQQS 2013 Applied
Statistics.
16