Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Teaching schedule
• Fuzzy
• 3 weeks
• Theory
• Examples + exercises
• Simulation by using Matlab
• Neuron Network
• 3 weeks
• Theory
• Examples + exercises
• Simulation by using Matlab
2
Grading
3
Contents
• Definitions
• Bit of History
• Fuzzy Applications
• Fuzzy Sets
• Fuzzy Boundaries
• Fuzzy Representation
• Linguistic Variables and Hedges
4
Definition
• Experts rely on common sense when they solve problems.
• How can we represent expert knowledge that uses vague and ambiguous terms in a computer?
• Fuzzy logic is not logic that is fuzzy, but logic that is used to describe fuzziness. Fuzzy logic is the
theory of fuzzy sets, sets that calibrate vagueness.
• Fuzzy logic is based on the idea that all things admit of degrees. Temperature, height, speed,
distance, beauty – all come on a sliding scale.
• The motor is running really hot.
• Tom is a very tall guy.
5
Definition
• The concept of a set and set theory are powerful concepts in mathematics. However, the
principal notion underlying set theory, that an element can (exclusively) either belong to set or
not belong to a set, makes it well nigh impossible to represent much of human discourse. How is
one to represent notions like:
• large profit
• high pressure
• tall man
• moderate temperature
• Ordinary set-theoretic representations will require the maintenance of a crisp differentiation in a
very artificial manner:
• high
• not quite high
• very high … etc.
6
Definition
• Many decision-making and problem-solving tasks are too complex to be understood
quantitatively, however, people succeed by using knowledge that is imprecise rather than
precise.
• Fuzzy set theory resembles human reasoning in its use of approximate information and
uncertainty to generate decisions.
• It was specifically designed to mathematically represent uncertainty and vagueness and provide
formalized tools for dealing with the imprecision intrinsic to many problems.
7
Definition
• Since knowledge can be expressed in a more natural way by using fuzzy sets, many engineering
and decision problems can be greatly simplified.
• Boolean logic uses sharp distinctions. It forces us to draw lines between members of a class and
non-members. For instance, we may say, Tom is tall because his height is 181 cm. If we drew a
line at 180 cm, we would find that David, who is 179 cm, is small.
• Is David really a small man or we have just drawn an arbitrary line in the sand?
8
Bit of History
• Fuzzy, or multi-valued logic, was introduced in the 1930s by Jan Lukasiewicz, a Polish philosopher.
While classical logic operates with only two values 1 (true) and 0 (false), Lukasiewicz introduced
logic that extended the range of truth values to all real numbers in the interval between 0 and 1.
• For example, the possibility that a man 181 cm tall is really tall might be set to a value of 0.86. It
is likely that the man is tall. This work led to an inexact reasoning technique often called
possibility theory.
• In 1965 Lotfi Zadeh, published his famous paper “Fuzzy sets”. Zadeh extended the work on
possibility theory into a formal system of mathematical logic, and introduced a new concept for
applying natural language terms. This new logic for representing and manipulating fuzzy terms
was called fuzzy logic.
9
Why?
• Why fuzzy?
As Zadeh said, the term is concrete, immediate and descriptive; we all know what it means.
However, many people in the West were repelled by the word fuzzy, because it is usually used in a
negative sense.
• Why logic?
Fuzziness rests on fuzzy set theory, and fuzzy logic is just a small part of that theory.
10
The Term “Fuzzy Logic”
• The term fuzzy logic is used in two senses:
• Narrow sense: Fuzzy logic is a branch of fuzzy set theory, which deals (as
logical systems do) with the representation and inference from knowledge.
Fuzzy logic, unlike other logical systems, deals with imprecise or uncertain
knowledge. In this narrow, and perhaps correct sense, fuzzy logic is just one of
the branches of fuzzy set theory.
11
Fuzzy Applications
• Theory of fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic has been applied to problems in a variety of fields:
• taxonomy; topology; linguistics; logic; automata theory; game theory; pattern recognition; medicine;
law; decision support; Information retrieval; etc.
12
Fuzzy Applications
Advertisement: …
• Extraklasse Washing Machine - 1200 rpm. The Extraklasse machine has a number of
features which will make life easier for you.
• Fuzzy Logic detects the type and amount of laundry in the drum and allows only as much
water to enter the machine as is really needed for the loaded amount. And less water
will heat up quicker - which means less energy consumption.
• Foam detection
Too much foam is compensated by an additional rinse cycle: If Fuzzy Logic detects the
formation of too much foam in the rinsing spin cycle, it simply activates an additional
rinse cycle. Fantastic!
• Imbalance compensation
In the event of imbalance, Fuzzy Logic immediately calculates the maximum
possible speed, sets this speed and starts spinning. This provides optimum
utilization of the spinning time at full speed […]
• Washing without wasting - with automatic water level adjustment
• Fuzzy automatic water level adjustment adapts water and energy consumption
to the individual requirements of each wash programme, depending on the
amount of laundry and type of fabric […]
13
More Definitions
• Fuzzy logic is a set of mathematical principles for knowledge
representation based on degrees of membership.
14
Fuzzy Sets
• The concept of a set is fundamental to mathematics.
• However, our own language is also the supreme expression of sets. For example, car indicates the
set of cars. When we say a car, we mean one out of the set of cars.
• The classical example in fuzzy sets is tall men. The elements of the fuzzy set “tall men” are all
men, but their degrees of membership depend on their height. (see table on next page)
15
Fuzzy Sets
Degree of Membership
Name Height, cm Crisp Fuzzy
Chris 208 1 1.00
Mark 205 1 1.00
John 198 1 0.98
Tom 181 1 0.82
David 179 0 0.78
Mike 172 0 0.24
Bob 167 0 0.15
Steven 158 0 0.06
Bill 155 0 0.01
Peter 152 0 0.00
16
Crisp Vs Fuzzy Sets
Degree of Crisp Sets
Membership
The x-axis represents the 1.0
universe of discourse – the 0.8
Tall Men
range of all possible values 0.6
applicable to a chosen variable. 0.4
In our case, the variable is the 0.2
man height. According to this 0.0
representation, the universe of 150 160 170 180 190 200 210
men’s heights consists of all tall Degree of
Height, cm
Fuzzy Sets
men. Membership
1.0
1, if x A
fA(x) : X {0, 1}, where f A ( x)
0, if x A
This set maps universe X to a set of two elements. For any element x of universe X, characteristic
function fA(x) is equal to 1 if x is an element of set A, and is equal to 0 if x is not an element of A.
18
A Fuzzy Set has Fuzzy Boundaries
• In the fuzzy theory, fuzzy set A of universe X is defined by function µA(x) called the membership
function of set A
This set allows a continuum of possible choices. For any element x of universe X, membership
function µA(x) equals the degree to which x is an element of set A. This degree, a value between 0
and 1, represents the degree of membership, also called membership value, of element x in set
A.
19
Fuzzy Set Representation
• First, we determine the membership functions. In our “tall men” example, we can obtain fuzzy
sets of tall, short and average men.
• The universe of discourse – the men’s heights – consists of three sets: short, average and tall
men. As you will see, a man who is 184 cm tall is a member of the average men set with a degree
of membership of 0.1, and at the same time, he is also a member of the tall men set with a
degree of 0.4. (see graph on next page)
20
Fuzzy Set Representation
Degree of Crisp Sets
Membership
1.0
0.8 Short Average Short
Tall
Tall Men
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
150 160 170 180 190 200 210
Height, cm
Degree of Fuzzy Sets
Membership
1.0
0.8
0.6 Short Average Tall
0.4
0.2 Tall
0.0
150 160 170 180 190 200 210
21
Fuzzy Set Representation
• Typical functions that can be used to represent a fuzzy set are sigmoid, gaussian and pi. However,
these functions increase the time of computation. Therefore, in practice, most applications use
linear fit functions.
(x)
X Fuzzy Subset A
1
0
Crisp Subset A Fuzziness Fuzziness x
22
Linguistic Variables and Hedges
• At the root of fuzzy set theory lies the idea of linguistic variables.
• A linguistic variable is a fuzzy variable. For example, the statement “John is tall” implies that the
linguistic variable John takes the linguistic value tall.
• In fuzzy expert systems, linguistic variables are used in fuzzy rules. For example:
IF wind is strong
THEN sailing is good
IF project_duration is long
THEN completion_risk is high
IF speed is slow
THEN stopping_distance is short
23
Linguistic Variables and Hedges
• The range of possible values of a linguistic variable represents the universe of discourse of that
variable. For example, the universe of discourse of the linguistic variable speed might have the
range between 0 and 220 km/h and may include such fuzzy subsets as very slow, slow, medium,
fast, and very fast.
• A linguistic variable carries with it the concept of fuzzy set qualifiers, called hedges.
• Hedges are terms that modify the shape of fuzzy sets. They include adverbs such as very,
somewhat, quite, more or less and slightly.
24
Linguistic Variables and Hedges
Degree of
Membership
1.0
Short Short
Tall
0.8
0.6 Average
0.4
Very Short Very
VeryTall
Tall
Tall
0.2
0.0
150 160 170 180 190 200 210
Height, cm
25
Linguistic Variables and Hedges
Hedge Mathematical Graphical Representation
Expression
26
Linguistic Variables and Hedges
Hedge Mathematical Graphical Representation
Expression
More or less A ( x )
Somewhat A ( x )
2 [A ( x )]2
if 0 A 0.5
Indeed
1 2 [1 A ( x )]2
if 0.5 < A 1
27
Closing
• Questions???
• Remarks???
• Comments!!!
• Evaluation!
28
Fuzzy Logic 2
Contents
• Characteristics of Fuzzy Sets
• Operations
• Properties
• Fuzzy Rules
• Examples
30
Characteristics of Fuzzy Sets
• The classical set theory developed in the late 19th century by Georg Cantor describes how crisp
sets can interact. These interactions are called operations.
• These properties and operations are the basis on which the fuzzy sets are used to deal with
uncertainty on the one hand and to represent knowledge on the other.
31
Note: Membership Functions
• For the sake of convenience, usually a fuzzy set is denoted as:
where A(xi)/xi (a singleton) is a pair “grade of membership” element, that belongs to a finite
universe of discourse:
32
Operations of Fuzzy Sets
Not A
B
A AA
Complement Containment
A B AA B
Intersection Union
33
Complement
• Crisp Sets: Who does not belong to the set?
• Fuzzy Sets: How much do elements not belong to the set?
• The complement of a set is an opposite of this set. For example, if we have the set of tall men, its
complement is the set of NOT tall men. When we remove the tall men set from the universe of
discourse, we obtain the complement.
A(x) = 1 A(x)
34
Containment
• Crisp Sets: Which sets belong to which other sets?
• Fuzzy Sets: Which sets belong to other sets?
• Similar to a Chinese box, a set can contain other sets. The smaller set is called the subset. For
example, the set of tall men contains all tall men; very tall men is a subset of tall men. However,
the tall men set is just a subset of the set of men. In crisp sets, all elements of a subset entirely
belong to a larger set. In fuzzy sets, however, each element can belong less to the subset than to
the larger set. Elements of the fuzzy subset have smaller memberships in it than in the larger set.
35
Intersection
• Crisp Sets: Which element belongs to both sets?
• Fuzzy Sets: How much of the element is in both sets?
• In classical set theory, an intersection between two sets contains the elements shared by these
sets. For example, the intersection of the set of tall men and the set of fat men is the area where
these sets overlap. In fuzzy sets, an element may partly belong to both sets with different
memberships.
• A fuzzy intersection is the lower membership in both sets of each element. The fuzzy intersection
of two fuzzy sets A and B on universe of discourse X:
AB(x) = min [A(x), B(x)] = A(x) B(x),
where xX
36
Union
• Crisp Sets: Which element belongs to either set?
• Fuzzy Sets: How much of the element is in either set?
• The union of two crisp sets consists of every element that falls into either set. For example, the
union of tall men and fat men contains all men who are tall OR fat.
• In fuzzy sets, the union is the reverse of the intersection. That is, the union is the largest
membership value of the element in either set. The fuzzy operation for forming the union of two
fuzzy sets A and B on universe X can be given as:
AB(x) = max [A(x), B(x)] = A(x) B(x),
where xX
37
Operations of Fuzzy Sets
(x) (x)
B
1 1 A
A
0 0
x x
B
1 1 A
Not A
0 0
Complement x Containment x
(x) (x)
1 1
A B A B
0 0
x x
1 AB 1
AB
0 0
Intersection x Union x
38
Properties of Fuzzy Sets
• Equality of two fuzzy sets
• Inclusion of one set into another fuzzy set
• Cardinality of a fuzzy set
• An empty fuzzy set
• -cuts (alpha-cuts)
39
Equality
• Fuzzy set A is considered equal to a fuzzy set B, IF AND ONLY IF (iff):
A(x) = B(x), xX
therefore A = B
40
Inclusion
• Inclusion of one fuzzy set into another fuzzy set. Fuzzy set A X is included in (is a subset of)
another fuzzy set, B X:
A(x) B(x), xX
then A is a subset of B, or A B
41
Cardinality
• Cardinality of a non-fuzzy set, Z, is the number of elements in Z. BUT the cardinality of a fuzzy set
A, the so-called SIGMA COUNT, is expressed as a SUM of the values of the membership function
of A, A(x):
cardA = A(x1) + A(x2) + … A(xn) = ΣA(xi), for i=1..n
cardA = 1.8
cardB = 2.05
42
Empty Fuzzy Set
• A fuzzy set A is empty, IF AND ONLY IF:
A(x) = 0, xX
then A is empty
43
Alpha-cut
• An -cut or -level set of a fuzzy set A X is an ORDINARY SET A X, such that:
A={A(x), xX}.
44
Fuzzy Set Normality
• A fuzzy subset of X is called normal if there exists at least one element xX such that A(x) = 1.
• All crisp subsets except for the null set are normal. In fuzzy set theory, the concept of nullness
essentially generalises to subnormality.
45
Fuzzy Sets Core and Support
• Assume A is a fuzzy subset of X:
• the support of A is the crisp subset of X consisting of all elements with membership grade:
supp(A) = {x A(x) 0 and xX}
• the core of A is the crisp subset of X consisting of all elements with membership grade:
core(A) = {x A(x) = 1 and xX}
46
Fuzzy Set Math Operations
• aA = {aA(x), xX}
Let a =0.5, and
A = {0.5/a, 0.3/b, 0.2/c, 1/d}
then
Aa = {0.25/a, 0.15/b, 0.1/c, 0.5/d}
• Aa = {A(x)a, xX}
Let a =2, and
A = {0.5/a, 0.3/b, 0.2/c, 1/d}
then
Aa = {0.25/a, 0.09/b, 0.04/c, 1/d}
• …
47
Fuzzy Sets Examples
• Consider two fuzzy subsets of the set X,
X = {a, b, c, d, e }
referred to as A and B
48
Fuzzy Sets Examples
• Support:
supp(A) = {a, b, c, d }
supp(B) = {a, b, c, d, e }
• Core:
core(A) = {a}
core(B) = {o}
• Cardinality:
card(A) = 1+0.3+0.2+0.8+0 = 2.3
card(B) = 0.6+0.9+0.1+0.3+0.2 = 2.1
49
Fuzzy Sets Examples
• Complement:
A = {1/a, 0.3/b, 0.2/c 0.8/d, 0/e}
A = {0/a, 0.7/b, 0.8/c 0.2/d, 1/e}
• Union:
A B = {1/a, 0.9/b, 0.2/c, 0.8/d, 0.2/e}
• Intersection:
A B = {0.6/a, 0.3/b, 0.1/c, 0.3/d, 0/e}
50
Fuzzy Sets Examples
• aA:
for a=0.5
aA = {0.5/a, 0.15/b, 0.1/c, 0.4/d, 0/e}
• Aa:
for a=2
Aa = {1/a, 0.09/b, 0.04/c, 0.64/d, 0/e}
• a-cut:
A0.2 = {a, b, c, d}
A0.3 = {a, b, d}
A0.8 = {a, d}
A1 = {a}
51
Fuzzy Rules
• In 1973, Lotfi Zadeh published his second most influential paper. This paper outlined a new
approach to analysis of complex systems, in which Zadeh suggested capturing human knowledge
in fuzzy rules.
IF x is A
THEN y is B
• where x and y are linguistic variables; and A and B are linguistic values determined by fuzzy sets
on the universe of discourses X and Y, respectively.
52
Classical Vs Fuzzy Rules
• A classical IF-THEN rule uses binary logic, for example,
Rule: 1 Rule: 2
IF speed is > 100 IF speed is < 40
THEN stopping_distance is long THEN stopping_distance is short
• The variable speed can have any numerical value between 0 and 220 km/h, but the linguistic
variable stopping_distance can take either value long or short. In other words, classical rules are
expressed in the black-and-white language of Boolean logic.
53
Classical Vs Fuzzy Rules
• We can also represent the stopping distance rules in a fuzzy form:
Rule: 1 Rule: 2
IF speed is fast IF speed is slow
THEN stopping_distance is long THEN stopping_distance is short
• In fuzzy rules, the linguistic variable speed also has the range (the universe of discourse) between
0 and 220 km/h, but this range includes fuzzy sets, such as slow, medium and fast. The universe
of discourse of the linguistic variable stopping_distance can be between 0 and 300 m and may
include such fuzzy sets as short, medium and long.
54
Classical Vs Fuzzy Rules
• Fuzzy rules relate fuzzy sets.
• In a fuzzy system, all rules fire to some extent, or in other words they fire partially. If the
antecedent is true to some degree of membership, then the consequent is also true to that same
degree.
55
Firing Fuzzy Rules
• These fuzzy sets provide the basis for a weight estimation model. The model is based on a
relationship between a man’s height and his weight:
IF height is tall
THEN weight is heavy
Degree of Degree of
Membership Membership
1.0 1.0
Tall men Heavy men
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
0.0 0.0
160 180 190 200 70 80 100 120
Height, cm Weight, kg
56
Firing Fuzzy Rules
• The value of the output or a truth membership grade of the rule consequent can be estimated
directly from a corresponding truth membership grade in the antecedent. This form of fuzzy
inference uses a method called monotonic selection.
Degree of Degree of
Membership Membership
1.0 1.0
Tall men
0.8 0.8 Heavy men
0.6 0.6
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
0.0 0.0
160 180 190 200 70 80 100 120
Height, cm Weight, kg
57
Firing Fuzzy Rules
• A fuzzy rule can have multiple antecedents, for example:
IF project_duration is long
AND project_staffing is large
AND project_funding is inadequate
THEN risk is high
IF service is excellent
OR food is delicious
THEN tip is generous
• The consequent of a fuzzy rule can also include multiple parts, for instance:
IF temperature is hot
THEN hot_water is reduced;
cold_water is increased
58
Fuzzy Sets Example
• Air-conditioning involves the delivery of air which can be warmed or cooled and have its humidity
raised or lowered.
• Consider Johnny’s air-conditioner which has five control switches: COLD, COOL, PLEASANT, WARM
and HOT. The corresponding speeds of the motor controlling the fan on the air-conditioner has
the graduations: MINIMAL, SLOW, MEDIUM, FAST and BLAST.
59
Fuzzy Sets Example
• The rules governing the air-conditioner are as follows:
RULE 1:
IF TEMP is COLD THEN SPEED is MINIMAL
RULE 2:
IF TEMP is COOL THEN SPEED is SLOW
RULE 3:
IF TEMP is PLEASANT THEN SPEED is MEDIUM
RULE 4:
IF TEMP is WARM THEN SPEED is FAST
RULE 5:
IF TEMP is HOT THEN SPEED is BLAST
60
Fuzzy Sets Example
The temperature graduations are
related to Johnny’s perception of Temp COLD COOL PLEASANT WARM HOT
(0C).
ambient temperatures.
0 Y* N N N N
5 Y Y N N N
where:
10 N Y N N N
Y : temp value belongs to the set
(0<A(x)<1) 12.5 N Y* N N N
15 N Y N N N
22.5 N N N Y* N
N : temp value is not a member of the 25 N N N Y N
set (A(x)=0)
27.5 N N N N Y
30 N N N N Y*
61
Fuzzy Sets Example
Johnny’s perception of the speed of
Rev/sec MINIMAL SLOW MEDIUM FAST BLAST
the motor is as follows: (RPM)
0 Y* N N N N
where: 10 Y N N N N
20 Y Y N N N
Y : temp value belongs to the set
(0<A(x)<1) 30 N Y* N N N
40 N Y N N N
50 N N Y* N N
Y* : temp value is the ideal member to
the set (A(x)=1) 60 N N N Y N
70 N N N Y* N
80 N N N Y Y
N : temp value is not a member of the
set (A(x)=0) 90 N N N N Y
100 N N N N Y*
62
Fuzzy Sets Example
• The analytically expressed membership for the reference fuzzy subsets for the temperature are:
• COLD:
for 0 ≤ t ≤ 10 COLD(t) = – t / 10 + 1
• SLOW:
for 0 ≤ t ≤ 12.5 SLOW(t) = t / 12.5
for 12.5 ≤ t ≤ 17.5 SLOW(t) = – t / 5 + 3.5
63
Fuzzy Sets Example
1
0.9
0.8 Cold
Truth Value
0.7
0.6 Cool
0.5 Pleasent
0.4
0.3
Warm
0.2 Hot
0.1
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Temperature Degrees C
64
Fuzzy Sets Example
• The analytically expressed membership for the reference fuzzy subsets for the temperature are:
• MINIMAL:
for 0 ≤ v ≤ 30 COLD(t) = – v / 30 + 1
• SLOW:
for 10 ≤ v ≤ 30 SLOW(t) = v / 20 – 0.5
for 30 ≤ v ≤ 50 SLOW(t) = – v / 20 + 2.5
65
Fuzzy Sets Example
Speed Fuzzy Sets
1
0.8 MINIMAL
Truth Value
0.6 SLOW
MEDIUM
0.4
FAST
0.2 BLAST
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Speed
66
Exercises
For
A = {0.2/a, 0.4/b, 1/c, 0.8/d, 0/e}
B = {0/a, 0.9/b, 0.3/c, 0.2/d, 0.1/e}
67
Solutions
A = {0.2/a, 0.4/b, 1/c, 0.8/d, 0/e}
B = {0/a, 0.9/b, 0.3/c, 0.2/d, 0.1/e}
Support
Supp(A) = {a, b, c, d}
Supp(B) = {b, c, d, e}
Core
Core(A) = {c}
Core(B) = {}
Cardinality
Card(A) = 0.2 + 0.4 + 1 + 0.8 + 0 = 2.4
Card(B) = 0 + 0.9 + 0.3 + 0.2 + 0.1 = 1.5
Complement
Comp(A) = {0.8/a, 0.6/b, 0/c, 0.2/d, 1/e}
Comp(B) = {1/a, 0.1/b, 0.7/c, 0.8/d, 0.9/e}
68
Solutions
A = {0.2/a, 0.4/b, 1/c, 0.8/d, 0/e}
B = {0/a, 0.9/b, 0.3/c, 0.2/d, 0.1/e}
Union
AB = {0.2/a, 0.9/b, 1/c, 0.8/d, 0.1/e}
Intersection
AB = {0/a, 0.4/b, 0.3/c, 0.2/d, 0/e}
C=A2
C = {0.04/a, 0.16/b, 1/c, 0.64/d, 0/e}
D = 0.5B
D = {0/a, 0.45/b, 0.15/c, 0.1/d, 0.05/e}
E = A0.5
E = {c, d}
69
Closing
• Questions???
• Remarks???
• Comments!!!
• Evaluation!
70
Fuzzy Logic 3
Contents
• Fuzzy Inference
• Fuzzification of the input variables
• Rule evaluation
• Aggregation of the rule outputs
• Defuzzification
• Mamdani
• Sugeno
72
Fuzzy Inference
• The most commonly used fuzzy inference technique is the so-called Mamdani method.
• In 1975, Professor Ebrahim Mamdani of London University built one of the first fuzzy systems to
control a steam engine and boiler combination. He applied a set of fuzzy rules supplied by
experienced human operators.
73
Mamdani Fuzzy Inference
• The Mamdani-style fuzzy inference process is performed in four steps:
4. Defuzzification.
74
Mamdani Fuzzy Inference
We examine a simple two-input one-output problem that includes three rules:
Rule: 1 Rule: 1
IF x is A3 IF project_funding is adequate
OR y is B1 OR project_staffing is small
THEN z is C1 THEN risk is low
Rule: 2 Rule: 2
IF x is A2 IF project_funding is marginal
AND y is B2 AND project_staffing is large
THEN z is C2 THEN risk is normal
Rule: 3 Rule: 3
IF x is A1 IF project_funding is inadequate
THEN z is C3 THEN risk is high
75
Step 1: Fuzzification
• The first step is to take the crisp inputs, x1 and y1 (project funding and project staffing), and
determine the degree to which these inputs belong to each of the appropriate fuzzy sets.
1 1 B1 B2
A1 A2 A3 0.7
0.5
0.2 0.1
0 0
x1 X y1 Y
(x = A1) = 0.5 (y = B1) = 0.1
(x = A2) = 0.2 (y = B2) = 0.7
76
Step 2: Rule Evaluation
• The second step is to take the fuzzified inputs, (x=A1) = 0.5, (x=A2) = 0.2, (y=B1) = 0.1 and (y=B2)
= 0.7, and apply them to the antecedents of the fuzzy rules.
• If a given fuzzy rule has multiple antecedents, the fuzzy operator (AND or OR) is used to obtain a
single number that represents the result of the antecedent evaluation.
• This number (the truth value) is then applied to the consequent membership function.
77
Step 2: Rule Evaluation
RECAL:
To evaluate the disjunction of the rule antecedents, we use the OR fuzzy operation. Typically, fuzzy
expert systems make use of the classical fuzzy operation union:
Similarly, in order to evaluate the conjunction of the rule antecedents, we apply the AND fuzzy
operation intersection:
78
Step 2: Rule Evaluation
1 1 1
A3 B1 C1 C2 C3
0.1 OR 0.1
0.0
(max)
0 x1 X 0 y1 Y 0 Z
Rule 1: IF x is A3 (0.0) OR y is B1 (0.1) THEN z is C1 (0.1)
1 1 1
0.7
C1 C2 C3
A2 0.2 B2 AND 0.2
(min)
0 x1 X 0 y1 Y 0 Z
Rule 2: IF x is A2 (0.2) AND y is B2 (0.7) THEN z is C2 (0.2)
1 1
A1 0.5 0.5 C1 C2 C3
0 x1 X 0 Z
Rule 3: IF x is A1 (0.5) THEN z is C3 (0.5)
79
Step 2: Rule Evaluation
• Now the result of the antecedent evaluation can be applied to the membership function of the
consequent.
80
Step 2: Rule Evaluation
• The most common method of correlating the rule consequent with the truth value of the rule
antecedent is to cut the consequent membership function at the level of the antecedent truth.
This method is called clipping (alpha-cut). (Khi chiếu giá trị biến vào ngõ ra, phần diện tích để
giải mờ)
• Since the top of the membership function is sliced, the clipped fuzzy set loses some information.
• However, clipping is still often preferred because it involves less complex and faster
mathematics, and generates an aggregated output surface that is easier to defuzzify.
81
Step 2: Rule Evaluation
• While clipping is a frequently used method, scaling offers a better approach for preserving the
original shape of the fuzzy set.
• The original membership function of the rule consequent is adjusted by multiplying all its
membership degrees by the truth value of the rule antecedent.
• This method, which generally loses less information, can be very useful in fuzzy expert systems.
82
Step 2: Rule Evaluation
Degree of Degree of
Membership Membership
1.0 1.0
C2 C2
0.2 0.2
0.0 0.0
Z Z
clipping scaling
83
Step 3: Aggregation of the rule outputs
• Aggregation is the process of unification of the outputs of all rules.
• We take the membership functions of all rule consequents previously clipped or scaled and
combine them into a single fuzzy set.
• The input of the aggregation process is the list of clipped or scaled consequent membership
functions, and the output is one fuzzy set for each output variable.
84
Step 3: Aggregation of the rule outputs
1 1 1
C1 C2 C3
0.5 0.5
0.2 0.2
0.1 0.1
0 Z 0 Z 0 Z 0 Z
z is C 1 (0.1) z is C 2 (0.2) z is C 3 (0.5)
85
Step 4: Defuzzification
• The last step in the fuzzy inference process is defuzzification.
• Fuzziness helps us to evaluate the rules, but the final output of a fuzzy system has to be a crisp
number.
• The input for the defuzzification process is the aggregate output fuzzy set and the output is a
single number.
86
Step 4: Defuzzification
• There are several defuzzification methods, but probably the most popular one is the centroid
technique. It finds the point where a vertical line would slice the aggregate set into two equal
masses. Mathematically this centre of gravity (COG) can be expressed as:
b
A x x dx
COG a
b
A x dx
a
87
Step 4: Defuzzification
• Centroid defuzzification method finds a point representing the centre of gravity of the fuzzy set,
A, on the interval, ab.
• A reasonable estimate can be obtained by calculating it over a sample of points.
(x)
1.0
0.8
0.6 A
0.4
0.2
a b
0.0 X
150 160 170 180 190 200 210
88
Step 4: Defuzzification
Degree of
Membership
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
67.4 Z
89
Sugeno Fuzzy Inference
• Mamdani-style inference, as we have just seen, requires us to find the centroid of a two-
dimensional shape by integrating across a continuously varying function. In general, this process
is not computationally efficient.
• Michio Sugeno suggested to use a single spike, a singleton, as the membership function of the
rule consequent.
• A singleton, or more precisely a fuzzy singleton, is a fuzzy set with a membership function that is
unity at a single particular point on the universe of discourse and zero everywhere else.
90
Sugeno Fuzzy Inference
• Sugeno-style fuzzy inference is very similar to the Mamdani method. Sugeno changed only a rule
consequent. Instead of a fuzzy set, he used a mathematical function of the input variable. The
format of the Sugeno-style fuzzy rule is
IF x is A
AND y is B
THEN z is f(x, y)
where x, y and z are linguistic variables; A and B are fuzzy sets on universe of discourses X and Y,
respectively; and f(x, y) is a mathematical function.
91
Sugeno Fuzzy Inference
• The most commonly used zero-order Sugeno fuzzy model applies fuzzy rules in the following
form:
IF x is A
AND y is B
THEN z is k
where k is a constant.
• In this case, the output of each fuzzy rule is constant. All consequent membership functions are
represented by singleton spikes.
92
Sugeno Rule Evaluation
1 1 1
A3 B1
0.1 OR 0.1
0.0
(max)
0 x1 X 0 y1 Y 0 k1 Z
0 x1 X 0 k3 Z
Rule 3: IF x is A1 (0.5) THEN z is k3 (0.5)
93
Sugeno Aggregation of the Rule Outputs
1 1 1 1
0.5 0.5
0.2
0.1 0.2 0.1
0 k1 Z 0 k2 Z 0 k3 Z 0 k1 k2 k3 Z
94
Sugeno Defuzzification
Weighted Average (WA)
0 z1 Z
Crisp Output
z1
95
Mamdani or Sugeno?
• Mamdani method is widely accepted for capturing expert knowledge. It allows us to describe the
expertise in more intuitive, more human-like manner. However, Mamdani-type fuzzy inference
entails a substantial computational burden.
• On the other hand, Sugeno method is computationally effective and works well with optimisation
and adaptive techniques, which makes it very attractive in control problems, particularly for
dynamic nonlinear systems.
96
Supplement for defuzzification
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
Closing
• Questions???
• Remarks???
• Comments!!!
• Evaluation!
111
Fuzzy Tutorial
Contents
• Recap
• Example: Air Conditioner
• Example: Cart Pole Problem
• Case Study: Building a Fuzzy Expert System
• Summary
113
Recap
• Process of developing a fuzzy expert system:
114
Recap
• Operation of a fuzzy expert system:
115
Example: Air Conditioner
1a. Specify the problem
Air-conditioning involves the delivery of air, which can be warmed or cooled and have its humidity raised
or lowered.
An air-conditioner is an apparatus for controlling, especially lowering, the temperature and humidity of an
enclosed space. An air-conditioner typically has a fan which blows/cools/circulates fresh air and has a
cooler. The cooler is controlled by a thermostat. Generally, the amount of air being compressed is
proportional to the ambient temperature.
116
Example: Air Conditioner
2. Determine Fuzzy Sets: Temperature
Temp (0C). COLD COOL PLEASANT WARM HOT
0 Y* N N N N
0< (T)<1 5 Y Y N N N
10 N Y N N N
12.5 N Y* N N N
15 N Y N N N
17.5 N N Y* N N
20 N N N Y N (T)=1
22.5 N N N Y* N
25 N N N Y N
27.5 N N N N Y
30 N N N N Y*
(T)=0
117
Example: Air Conditioner
2. Determine Fuzzy Sets: Fan Speed
Rev/sec MINIMAL SLOW MEDIUM FAST BLAST
(RPM)
0 Y* N N N N
10 Y N N N N
20 Y Y N N N
30 N Y* N N N
40 N Y N N N
50 N N Y* N N
60 N N N Y N
70 N N N Y* N
80 N N N Y Y
90 N N N N Y
100 N N N N Y*
118
Example: Air Conditioner
2. Determine Fuzzy Sets: Temperature
1 1
0.9 0.9
0.8 0.8 Cold
Cold
Truth Value
Truth Value
0.7 0.7
0.6 0.6 Cool
Cool
0.5 0.5 Pleasent
Pleasent
0.4 0.4
0.3 0.3
Warm
Warm
0.2 0.2 Hot
Hot
0.1 0.1
0 0
0 0 5 5 1010 15
15 20
20 2525 3030
Temperature
Temperature Degrees
Degrees CC
119
Example: Air Conditioner
2. Determine Fuzzy Sets: Fan Speed
1
0.8 MINIMAL
Truth Value
0.6 SLOW
MEDIUM
0.4
FAST
0.2 BLAST
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Speed
120
Example: Air Conditioner
3. Elicit and construct fuzzy rules
121
Example: Air Conditioner
4. Encode into an Expert System
Consider a temperature of 16oC, use the system to compute the optimal fan
speed.
Fuzzification
Inference
Composition
Defuzzification
122
Example: Air Conditioner
• Fuzzification
• Affected fuzzy sets: COOL and PLEASANT
COOL(T) = – T / 5 + 3.5 PLSNT(T) = T /2.5 - 6
= – 16 / 5 + 3.5 = 16 /2.5 - 6
= 0.3 = 0.4
0 0.3 0.4 0 0
123
Example: Air Conditioner
• Inference
124
Example: Air Conditioner
• Inference
126
Example: Air Conditioner
• Defuzzification
= 45.54rpm
127
Example: Cart Pole Problem
m
w
g
w ns nm ns ps
az nb nm ns az ps pm pb
ps ns ps pm
pm nm
pb nb ns
nb: negative big, nm: negative medium, ns: negative small az: approximately zero
ps: positive small, pm: positive medium, pb: positive big
IF θ is negative medium
AND w is approximately zero
THEN F is negative medium
129
Example: Cart Pole Problem
The fuzzy sets for θ, and F are based on the linear equation
μ(x)=ax + b, and are defined based on the following table:
w1 if
w
w w1 if
w
w
w0 if
w
130
Example: Cart Pole Problem
• Based on the fuzzy sets table draw three graphs showing the fuzzy
sets (nb, nm, ns, az, ps, pm, pb) for each θ, ω, and F individually.
• Consider the case when the input variables are: θ = 50, ω = -5.
Use the rule base, execute each of the four tasks to compute the force
F necessary to balance the pole using the Centre of Gravity in the
Defuzzification task.
131
Example: Cart Pole Problem
• Fuzzification
IF θ is pm AND ω is az THEN F is pm
IF θ is pb AND ω is az THEN F is pb
132
Example: Cart Pole Problem
• Fuzzification
iii) Compute membership functions
1
1
1/22.5 = /17.5
θ: pm 0.78
22.5 45 50 67.5 45 50 67.5
1
1/22.5 = /5
θ: pb
0.22
45 50 67.5
1
w: az 1/11.25 = /6.25
-11.25 -5 0 10
0.56
133
Example: Cart Pole Problem
• Inference
1. IF θ is pm AND ω is az THEN F is pm
2. IF θ is pb AND ω is az THEN F is pb
The two premises in RULE 2 are conjunctive
minimum of the two: min{0.22, 0.56} = 0.22
134
Example: Cart Pole Problem
• Composition
ps
pb
• Defuzzification
3 0.2 (4 5 6) 0.56 (7 8) 0.22
SoG
CoG 5.30
0.2 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.22 0.22
135
Case Study: Building a Fuzzy System
Step 1: Specify the problem and define linguistic variables
A service centre keeps spare parts and repairs failed ones. A customer
brings a failed item and receives a spare of the same type. Failed
parts are repaired, placed on the shelf, and thus become spares.
There are four main linguistic variables: average waiting time (mean
delay) m, repair utilisation factor of the service centre p, number of
servers s, and initial number of spare parts n.
136
Linguistic Variable: Mean Delay, m
Linguistic Value Notation Numerical Range (normalised)
Very Short VS [0, 0.3]
Short S [0.1, 0.5]
Medium M [0.4, 0.7]
Linguistic Variable: Number of Servers, s
Linguistic Value Notation Numerical Range (normalised)
Small S [0, 0.35]
Medium M [0.30, 0.70]
Large L [0.60, 1]
Linguistic
Linguistic Variable: Factor,
Variable: Repair Utilisation Factor,
Linguistic Value Notation Numerical Range
Low L [0, 0.6]
Medium M [0.4, 0.8]
High H [0.6, 1]
Linguistic Variable: Number of Spares, n
Linguistic Value Notation Numerical Range (normalised)
Very Small VS [0, 0.30]
Small S [0, 0.40]
Rather Small RS [0.25, 0.45]
Medium M [0.30, 0.70]
Rather Large RL [0.55, 0.75]
Large L [0.60, 1]
Very Large VL [0.70, 1]
137
Case Study: Building a Fuzzy System
Step 2: Determine fuzzy sets
138
Case Study: Building a Fuzzy System
Fuzzy sets of Mean Delay m
Degree of
Membership
1.0
0.8 VS S M
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Mean Delay (normalised)
139
Case Study: Building a Fuzzy System
Fuzzy sets of Number of Servers s
Degree of
Membership
1.0
0.8 S M L
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Number of Servers (normalised)
140
Case Study: Building a Fuzzy System
Fuzzy sets of Repair Utilisation Factor p
Degree of
Membership
1.0
0.8 L M H
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Repair Utilisation Factor
141
Case Study: Building a Fuzzy System
Fuzzy sets of Number of Spares n
Degree of
Membership
1.0
0.8 VS S RS M RL L VL
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Number of Spares (normalised)
142
Case Study: Building a Fuzzy System
Step 3: Elicit and construct fuzzy rules
To accomplish this task, we might ask the expert to describe how the
problem can be solved using the fuzzy linguistic variables defined
previously.
143
Case Study: Building a Fuzzy System
The square FAM representation
144
Case Study: Building a Fuzzy System
The rule table
145
Case Study: Building a Fuzzy System
Rule Base 1
146
Case Study: Building a Fuzzy System
Cube FAM of Rule Base 2
s
s
VS VS VS L RL M RS
VS VS VS
L S S VS
VS VS VS M M M S
VS VS VS
M VS VS VS
VS VS VS S VL L M
VS VS VS
S VS VS VS H VS S M H
M
L s
VS S M m
L M RS S
m
M RS S VS
S S VS VS
M
VS S M
s
m
L S S VS
M VS VS VS
S VS VS VS
L
VS S M
m
147
Case Study: Building a Fuzzy System
Step 4: Encode the fuzzy sets, fuzzy rules and procedures to perform
fuzzy inference into the expert system
148
Case Study: Building a Fuzzy System
Step 5: Evaluate and tune the system
The last, and the most laborious, task is to evaluate and tune the
system. We want to see whether our fuzzy system meets the
requirements specified at the beginning.
The Fuzzy Logic Toolbox can generate surface to help us analyse the
system’s performance.
149
Case Study: Building a Fuzzy System
Three-dimensional plots for Rule Base 1
0.6
number_of_spares
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.2 1
0.8
0.4 0.6
0.4
0.6 0.2
mean_delay 0 number_of_servers
150
Case Study: Building a Fuzzy System
Three-dimensional plots for Rule Base 1
0.6
number_of_spares
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0
0.2 1
0.8
0.4 0.6
0.4
0.6 0.2
mean_delay 0 utilisation_factor
151
Case Study: Building a Fuzzy System
Three-dimensional plots for Rule Base 2
0.35
number_of_spares
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.2 1
0.8
0.4 0.6
0.4
0.6 0.2
mean_delay 0 number_of_servers
152
Case Study: Building a Fuzzy System
Three-dimensional plots for Rule Base 2
0.5
0.4
number_of_spares 0.3
0.2
0.2 1
0.8
0.4 0.6
0.4
0.6 0.2
mean_delay 0 utilisation_factor
153
Case Study: Building a Fuzzy System
Tune the system…
However, even now, the expert might not be satisfied with the system
performance.
154
Case Study: Building a Fuzzy System
Modified fuzzy sets of Number of Servers s
Degree of
Membership
1.0
0.8 S RS M RL L
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Number of Servers (normalised)
155
Case Study: Building a Fuzzy System
Cube FAM of Rule Base 3
s
s
VS VS VS L L M RS
VS VS VS
L S S VS
VS VS VS RL RL M RS
VS VS VS
RL S S VS
VS VS VS M M M S
VS VS VS
M VS VS VS
VS VS VS s RS VL RL RS
VS VS VS
RS VS VS VS
VS VS VS L M RS S S VL L M
VS VS VS
S VS VS VS H VS S M H
M RL M RS S
L m
VS S M
m M RS S VS
s RS S VS VS
L S S VS S S VS VS
M
VS S M
RL S S VS
m
M VS VS VS
RS VS VS VS
S VS VS VS
L
VS S M
m
156
Case Study: Building a Fuzzy System
Three-dimensional plots for Rule Base 3
0.35
0.3
number_of_spares
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.2 1
0.8
0.4 0.6
0.4
0.6 0.2
mean_delay 0 number_of_servers
157
Case Study: Building a Fuzzy System
Three-dimensional plots for Rule Base 3
0.5
0.4
number_of_spares 0.3
0.2
0.2 1
0.8
0.4 0.6
0.4
0.6 0.2
mean_delay 0 utilisation_factor
158
Case Study: Building a Fuzzy System
Tuning fuzzy systems
2. Review the fuzzy sets, and if required define additional sets on the
universe of discourse. The use of wide fuzzy sets may cause the fuzzy
system to perform roughly.
159
Case Study: Building a Fuzzy System
4. Review the existing rules, and if required add new rules to the rule
base.
6. Adjust the rule execution weights. Most fuzzy logic tools allow
control of the importance of rules by changing a weight multiplier.
7. Revise shapes of the fuzzy sets. In most cases, fuzzy systems are
highly tolerant of a shape approximation.
160
Summary
• Process of developing a fuzzy expert system
161