TITLE DEFENSE EVALUATION RUBRIC
Name of Students:
1. _______________________________
2. _______________________________
3. _______________________________
4. _______________________________
5. _______________________________
PROPOSED TITLE: ____________________________________________________________________
APPROVED TITLE: ____________________________________________________________________
ASPECT EXEMPLARY
(5 points)
Content The content is clear and concise and deals with
important issue in the field of study.
Information is accurate
Organization Presents information in logical, interesting
sequence which panel can follow.
Subject Knowledge Demonstrates full knowledge by answering all
questions with explanation and elaboration.
Eye Contact Maintains eye contact with the panel, seldom
returning to notes.
Elocution Uses a clear voice and correct, precise
pronunciation of terms so that all panel
members can hear presentation.
PowerPoint Slides Graphics explain and reinforce screen text.
Graphics are clear and easy to follow. No
misspellings or grammatical errors. Texts are
readable.
_____________________________________
ACCOMPLISHED
(3 points)
The content provides persuasive
information and is accurate.
Presents information in logical sequence
which panel can follow.
Answers all questions but fails to
elaborate.
Occasionally uses eye contact, but still
reads most of the report.
Voice is clear. Pronounces most word
correctly. Most panel can hear the
presentation
Graphics relate to text and are readable
with minor misspellings and grammatical
errors. Texts are readable.
Panel Member
COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS
POOR SCORE
(1 point)
The content is vague in conveying the point of
view and does create a strong sense of purpose.
Panel has difficulty following the presentation
because students jump around.
Students are uncomfortable with information
and are able to answer only rudimentary
questions.
Reads all of report with no eye contact
Mumbles. Incorrectly pronounces terms and
speaks too quietly for panel in the back of class
to hear.
Uses graphics that rarely support text and
presentation. Texts are difficult to read and
understand.