Technical Service Bulletin 2017 ASME Synopsis Executive Summary

ONECIS INSURANCE COMPANY
Executive Summary
Bulletin
2017 Edition, ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel
Non-Nuclear Code Synopsis
9/18/2017
The content of this publication represent OneCIS Insurance Company’s opinion and is not intended to be
an official interpretation of the ASME Code. Every effort was made to be accurate. However, we caution
Code users to alwaysrefer to the actual Code rules that apply and to use this document as a supplementary
tool to the Code. Formal interpretation can only be made by ASME. It should be noted that it is always
the Certificate Holder’s responsibility to comply with the Code. Please contact OneCIS’s Technical
Services staff if further background information is desired for this subject.
Copyright 2017
OneCIS Insurance Co
This document highlights the most important changes to the 2017 editions of the ASME Non-Nuclear
Boiler & Pressure Vessel Codes.
Technical Service Bulletin OneCIS Insurance Company
2017 ASME Code Edition Synopsis
The 2017 edition to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code was published on July 1, 2017,
and includes revisions, additions, and errata approved in previous years by the ASME B&PV
Committee. The mandatory implementation date for the 2017 edition of the Code is six months
from the date of publication, or January 1, 2018. As always, the 2017 edition of the Code may
be optionally implemented upon receipt.
Approximately 80 changes are itemized in this Synopsis. Many of these changes are the result
of new technology and/or at the request of Certificate Holders like you. This Synopsis also
includes a listing of Code Cases that have been newly approved or revised between August 1,
2016 and July 1, 2017. This is in a Xcel Spreadsheet.
This Synopsis was prepared by the OneCIS Insurance Company’s Technical Consultants to
provide insights into the intent of these changes, and their potential impact on Code users.
Each item that passed the ASME B&PV Standards Committee for the 2017 edition was entered
into the main database, and then the most important changes were brought into this executive
summary.
Commentary on revisions represents OneCIS Insurance Company’s opinion of the changes,

and it is not intended to be an official interpretation of the ASME Code. Every effort was made
to accurately describe the changes made to this edition. However, we caution Code users to
always refer to the actual Code rules that apply and to use this document as a supplementary
tool to the Code. Please contact OneCIS Insurance Company’s Technical Staff if further
background information is desired on any of the revisions or Code Cases published.
The following Executive Summary highlights the more noteworthy revisions. We hope you find
this information helpful. If you need further clarification, please contact your Inspector,
Supervisor, or the Technical Staff.
Ed Whittle
Director of Codes & Standards
OneCIS Insurance Company
Any questions or comments on this document may be directed to:
Gary Brouette…………(281)-310-3123 gary.brouette@onecis.com (Section III)

Jose Chavero…………(281)-986-1368 jose.chavero@onecis.com
Frank Hamtak………...(281)-249-4487 francis.hamtak@onecis.com (Section VIII & IX)
Patrick Hennessey……(281)-986-1364 patrick.hennessey@onecis.com (Section XI)
Jake Hixson…………...(781)-584-1105 jake.hixson@onecis.com
Paul Shanks…………...(281)-986-1371 paul.shanks@onecis.com
Bill Tillman……………..(281)-310-3065 william.tillman@onecis.com (Section VIII & IX)
Steve Voorhees……….(610)-587-1183 stephen.voorhees@onecis.com (Section I & IV)
Ed Whittle……………...(781)-584-1104 ed.whittle@onecis.com (Section I & VIII)
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section I – Power Boilers…………………………………………………...3
Section IV – Heating Boilers…………………………………………….....12
Section V – Nondestructive Examination………………………………...14
Section VIII, Division 1 – Pressure Vessels…………………………......16
Section VIII, Division 2 – Pressure Vessels, Alternative Rules……….20
Section VIII, Division 3 – Alt. Rules for High Pressure Vessels……….21
Section IX – Welding and Brazing Qualifications………………………..18
Section X – Fiber-Reinforced Plastic Pressure Vessels………………...22
Section XII – Rules for Construction and Continued Service

of Transport Tanks…………………………………………………...28
2
Code Revisions by Sections

Section I
Record Number: 09-1324
What was affected: Paragraphs PG-72.3, PG-72.4, and PG-73.8
What was changed: Paragraphs PG-72.3 and PG-72.4 were removed from the Code.
Paragraph PG-73.8 was added in to replace the removed paragraphs.
Why the change occurred: Paragraph PG-72.3 provides for a set pressure change of a
pressure relief valve that has been set and sealed by the manufacturer or assembler but allows
for other parties to make set pressure adjustments which will require breaking the seals of the
organization responsible for setting and testing the pressure relief valve. Paragraph PG-72.4
gives requirements for a replacement spring if needed. Both paragraphs allow a manufacturer's
authorized representative or an assembler to make set pressure and spring replacements. The
manufacturers authorized representative is not defined in the Code. An assembler may not
necessarily have authority to apply the Mark to the valve being modified. There is no
requirement for designated oversight of the set pressure adjustment or spring replacement. The
new paragraph PG-73.8 clearly defines who is able to make these set pressure changes. This
new paragraph gives clear guidelines as to how to make a set pressure change on relief valves.
What was affected: Paragraphs PG-1 and PG-2.4. Part PTFH (Requirements for Liquid
Thermal Fluid Heaters)
What was changed: Paragraph PG-1 was changed to say that the rules stated in the general
part of the Code would apply to the new part, Liquid Thermal Fluid Heaters. In the previous
Code edition of Section I, paragraph PG-2.4 stated that the rules of Section I were “not intended
to apply to thermal fluid heaters in which a fluid other than water is heated by the application of
heat”. With the addition of the new Code section, this paragraph had to be deleted because the
Code now does intend to have the rules apply to this type of construction.
Why the change occurred: These changes were brought about because some Jurisdictions
do require that liquid phase thermal heaters be constructed and stamped in accordance with
Section I. The 2015 version of paragraph PG-2.4 did not provide clear enough rules for all
manufactures to follow. The addition of the new Part PTFH does give manufactures a clear
path to constructing Liquid Phase Thermal Heaters which is why the changes to the Code had
to be made.
What was affected: Paragraphs PG-67.2, PG-67.2.1.6, PG-69.1.1, PG-69.1.4, PG-69.1.5,

PG-69.2.2, PG-69.2.3, PG-73.5.2, PG-73.5.2.1, PG-73.5.3, PG-110, PG-69.1.6
3
What was changed: Paragraph 67.2.1.6 was changed to allow economizers that can be
isolated, in an overpressure situation to set the relief valve or valves to prevent the pressure
from rising more than 10% or 3 psi above the maximum allowable working pressure. In the
2015 Code, this limit was set at 6%. Because of this change, paragraph PG-67.2 had to be
changed to include the reference to the new limit for these types of economizers in PG-67.2.1.6.
Paragraphs PG-69.1.1, PG-69.1.4, PG-69.1.5, PG-69.2.2, and PG-69.2.3 were revised to
include capacity certification test requirements for liquids. Paragraphs PG-73.5.2 and PG73.5.3
were revised to include the testing requirements for liquid relief valves. Paragraph PG-110 was
revised to include the stamping requirements for liquid relief valves. Lastly, paragraph PG-
69.1.6 was deleted due to the introduction of liquid relief valves into Section I of the ASME
Code.
Why the change occurred: All of the changes above occurred because of the new rules
that were added to PG-67.2.1.6. Since economizers that can be isolated can now have an over
pressure limit of 10%, many other changes had to be made in the Code to allow for this change
to be made.
What was affected: Part PL, Paragraph PL-54
What was changed: New paragraph PL-54 was added into Part PL for the rules and
requirements for construction of locomotive boilers. The new paragraph establishes rules for
pressure relief valves.
Why the change occurred: In the 2015 Section I Code, there was no paragraph PL-54.
The subgroup on locomotive boilers has the task of maintaining and establishing rules for
locomotive boilers, and up until this point there were not set rules in Part PL for pressure relief
valves. The subgroup decided that their part needed to establish rules for pressure relief
valves.
What was affected: Non-mandatory Appendix C, Paragraphs PG-90.1.11, PW-38.2, and PW-
39.3.
What was changed: The Code added a new non-mandatory appendix to this year’s edition.
Non-mandatory Appendix C is the new non-mandatory appendix. Non-mandatory Appendix C
covers local heating of welds in cylindrical components of P-No. 15E materials when using
electric resistance heating. Paragraphs PW-38.2 and PW-39.3 were revised to invoke the new
Non-mandatory Appendix C for local heat treatment of P-No. 15E materials when using electric
resistance heating. Paragraph PG-90.1.11 was revised to include the new Non-mandatory
Appendix C into the list of heat treatments that the AI is required to verify.
Why the change occurred: Recent testing has shown that when performing post weld heat
treatment on components using applied heat from one side only, the through wall temperature
4
gradients that are generated can be very large. AWS D10.10 style rules based on a heat band
type of concept have been shown to generate at least a 50°F through wall temperature gradient.
Section I has no such requirement, only mandating the width of the soak band is encompassing
the weld. Heat treatment using Section I rules without paying attention to the width of the heated
band can produce temperature gradients approaching 75°F or even 100°F. Post weld heat
treating the P-No. 15E creep strength-enhanced ferritic materials without using a heat band type
control runs the risk of leaving large areas of the weld possibly under tempered and susceptible
to cracking during service. This appendix provides guidance and instruction on how to conduct
a heat treatment using a heat band type control, and sets out the minimum requirements for
performing heating or heat treatment of welds in P-No. 15E materials when using electric
resistance heating. It specifically addresses the application of controlled heat to the weld metal,
the heat affected zone (HAZ), and a limited volume of base metal adjacent to the weld.
What was affected: Paragraphs PG-32.1.4, PG-38, PG-52.1, PG-53.1, and PG-53.2. Figures
PG-38.1-1, PG-38.2-1, PG-38
What was changed: Paragraph PG-32.1.4 was revised to include a reference to PG-38 for
openings in shells and heads. Paragraph PG-38 underwent a few changes to its sections. PG-
38.1 was revised to add a new last sentence that explains how to proportion the overlap area
between two openings based on the ratio of their diameters, and it was also revised to add in a
reference to the new Figure PG-38.1-1. In PG-38.2, the Code clarifies how to reinforce more
than two openings, which is based on Section VIII, Div. 1, UG-42(b). PG-38.2 was also revised
to reference the new Figure PG-38.2-1. The existing PG-38.3 from the 2015 Code has been
relabeled and moved to PG-38.5. A new PG-38.3 was been written into the 2017 Code, and it
explains an alternate method to reinforce any number of adjacent openings, which is based on
Section VIII, Div. 1, UG-42(c). In PG-38.4, changes were made to clarify a series of openings
as three or more. The changes also clarify that reinforcement to PG-38.4 is to be per PG-38.1
along with the existing ligament area requirements in PG-38.4. Lastly for PG-38.4, the changes
clarified that PG-52 or PG-53 can be used as alternative rules for reinforcement of ligaments for
groups of openings, which is based on PG-32.1.2 and Interpretation I-78-12. Figure PG-38 was
relabeled as Figure PG-38.4. PG-52.1 was revised to add reference to Figures PG-52.2 thru
PG-52.5 for examples of groups of openings in a definite pattern. PG-53.1 was revised to clarify
groups of openings are groups of three or more openings. PG-53.2 was revised to clarify tubes
meant three or more tubes.
Why the change occurred: The changes are being made to clarify the existing rules and
add rules to enhance the compensation of multiple openings with overlapping reinforcement.
New Figures PG-38.1 and PG-38.2 were added to provide graphical representation of two
openings and more than two openings that have overlapping reinforcement. The existing PG-
38.2 does not provide rules when openings are spaced closer than 1-1/3 times their average
diameter, so rules are added based on Section VIII-1 UG-42(b) were added. With the changes
to PG-38.1, PG-38.2 and PG-38.3 the compensation for multiple openings are similar to those
of Section VIII-1 UG-42(a) thru (c). The changes to PG-38.4 are clarifications of reinforcement
5
rules for a series of openings in a definite pattern as noted in PG-32.1.2 and Interpretation I-78-
12. Changes in PG-52.1, PG-53.1 and PG-53.2 are clarifications of groups of openings
considering ligaments.
What was affected: Paragraph PG-75 General
What was changed: Visual examination requirements were added that mandate visual
examination to verify compliance with dimensional requirements, joint preparation &
alignment prior to welding and finish welding conditions. It goes on to detail other
requirements such as lighting, angle and distance to the eye, cleanliness, etc.
Why the change occured: While visual examination is required in certain Section I
paragraphs & implied in others, there are no specific rules as to technique,
magnification, etc. Will probably impact QC Manuals.
What was affected: Paragraph PG-77
What was changed: Paragraph PG-77 was revised to include a new section, PG-77.5. This
new section paragraph explains that manufactures must maintain traceability of the material
from its original markings in some way for material other than plate. The paragraph explains
that any suitable method is acceptable.
Why the change occurred: Section I, PG-77 addresses identification and traceability of
plate material but does not address other pressure part material. The intent of this action is to
provide the requirement for a Section I Certificate Holder to maintain the identity of the pressure
part material until the required Data Report is completed. Once a partial data report or Master
Data report, whichever comes first, is certified the material identity requirement is satisfied.
Material identification for the Part that is masked, removed, or otherwise obliterated due to
subsequent processing need not be reestablished.
What was affected: Table PW-39-8
What was changed: A cautionary note was added to Table PW-39-8. The note brings up
the phenomenon known as relaxation cracking and that it can occur not only in cold formed
areas but also in welds where high levels of residual stress exists. Therefore, the heat
treatment conditions of Table PG-19 are referenced as guidelines for performing PWHT to avoid
relaxation cracking.
Why the change occurred: This item was opened by the Relaxation Cracking (RC) issue of
the welds of austenitic stainless steels used for elevated temperature service. According to
some technical reports, PWHT is the most effective method to avoid RC.
6
What was affected: Paragraph PW-51.4
What was changed: PW-51.4 was revised to allow for the digitization of radiographic films.
In previous editions, PW-51.4 did not recognize any other type of radiographic film other than
the physical film itself. The new edition of this paragraph recognizes all types of radiographic
film
Why the change occurred: Current technology provides for accurate and secure
conversion of radiographs from analog film to digital images. Section I rules addressing this
practice will allow for retention of the radiographic images into digital format.
What was affected: Paragraphs PG-25.2.4 & PW-50
What was changed: PG-25.2.4 was revised to include additional requirements for a
Certificate Holder’s written practice for qualification and certification if computed radiography
(CR) or digital radiography (DR) is used. PW-50 was revised to include additional requirements
for a Certificate Holder’s written practice for qualification and certification if computed
radiography (CR), digital radiography (DR), phased array ultrasonic testing (PAUT), or
ultrasonic time-of-flight diffraction (TOFD) are used. In both cases of revision, the Code states
that the training, experience, and examination requirements in Section V, Article 1, Mandatory
Appendix II shall also be included in the Certificate Holder’s written practice for each technique.
Why the change occurred: The current adopted Editions (2006) of SNT-TC-1A and CP-189
do not provide minimum guidance to the employer in developing a written practice for qualifying
NDE personnel in two RT techniques, computed radiography (CR), and digital radiography
(DR), as well as two UT techniques, phased array ultrasonic (PAUT), and ultrasonic time of
flight diffraction (TOFD). One of the advantages of the 2011 Editions of SNT-TC-1A and CP-189
is that they do provide minimum guidance on developing an employer’s written practice for
these four NDE techniques. Record Numbers, 11-1849 and 11-1850 were previously opened by
Section I to consider the adoption of the 2011 Editions of SNT-TC-1A and CP-189. These
record numbers were placed on hold pending the parallel action of Section V Committee
adopting the same standard editions through Record Numbers, 11-1837 and 11-1838. Section
V came to the determination not to adopt the 2011 Edition of SNT-TC-1A and CP-189 and in
doing so, closed Record Numbers, 11-1837 and 11-1838. Due to this action by Section V,
Section I closed Record Numbers: 11-1849 and 11-1850 considering the adoption of the 2011
Editions of those standards and opened a new Record Number, 14-2209 to address providing
guidance to employers on developing a written practice for qualifying NDE personnel in the four
referenced techniques. Section V, realizing the need to provide guidance to employers in
developing their written practices for qualifying NDE personnel in these techniques, opened a
new Record Number, 12-1907. This Record Number reaffirms the 2006 Editions of SNT-TC-1A
and CP-189, but also incorporates mandatory additional requirements for training, experience,
and examination that must be included in the employer’s written practice, if the techniques of
7
computed radiography (CR), digital radiography (DR), phased array ultrasonic (PAUT), or
ultrasonic time of flight diffraction (TOFD) are to be used. These additional requirements enter
into Section V through the creation of a new Mandatory Appendix, which is Section V, Article 1,
Mandatory Appendix II.
What was affected: Non-mandatory Appendix D
What was changed: Non-mandatory Appendix D was added to Section I in the edition. Non-
mandatory Appendix D was added to provide guidelines to boiler designers when they are
dealing with damage mechanisms such as corrosion, erosion, and oxidation of boiler tubes in
coal-fired plants.
Why the change occurred: The purpose for this Non-Mandatory Appendix is to support the
Modernization project for Section I. This is a Non-Mandatory appendix with specific reference to
various predictive models and equations in ASME publication STP-PT-066. There is also
reference to ASME Section II Non-mandatory Appendix A.
What was affected: Paragraph PG-50
What was changed: PG-50 is a new paragraph for the 2017 edition of Section I. It deals
with drilled holes that do not penetrate through a vessel wall. This new paragraph is based on
the Code Case 1998-1. This Code Case has been incorporated into the Code as paragraph
PG-50.
Why the change occurred: CC 1998 was based on a Section VIII Div. I CC and has been in
use since 1987. Section VIII has since incorporated the CC into a Mandatory Appendix 30 in
Section VIII Div. I, however, the current Appendix 30 now includes restrictions not found in CC
1998-1. Two Manufacturers who currently use CC 1998-1 performed calculations comparing
the approach of Appendix 30 to the CC. If Section I were to adopt the approach of Mandatory
Appendix 30 found in Section VIII Div. 1, Manufacturers who have been using the CC for many
years would no longer be permitted to place instrumentation such as temperature probes in the
locations necessary for their design. Therefore, the changes are the incorporation of CC 1998-1
into a new PG-50 rather than harmonize with Section VIII, Div. 1.
Record Numbers: 14-2420, 15-1371, AND 16-1099
What was affected: All Manufacturers’ Data Reports
What was changed: Units of measurement were removed from the P-3A, more room
was provided for the name and address on the P-4, P-4A and P-4B. ALL Data Reports
were revised to delete “endorsement” where the Authorized Inspector’s National Board
number is inserted.
8
Why the change occured: The first two items are self-explanatory; the last item was
changed to address the new requirements for Authorized Inspection from the National
Board. In essence the “A” endorsement doesn’t exist anymore. All Certificate Holders
will need to start using the new forms on January 1st, if not before.
What was affected: Paragraphs PG-16.7, PG-33.3, and PG-43
What was changed: PG-16.7 is a new paragraph for this edition of Section I. PG-16.7
clarifies that the dimensional symbols in all design formula throughout this Code represent
dimensions in the corroded and/or eroded condition. This is very similar to the words in UG-
16(e) of Section VIII, Div. 1. Next, in PG-33.3 the nomenclature for t and tn was revised to
include the information from PG-16.7. Also, endnote 13 was deleted from this paragraph. The
information from this endnote was moved directly into the definition of t and tn. Finally, PG-43
was revised to clarify that corrosion and erosion allowances are to be included in the minimum
nozzle neck thickness requirements.
Why the change occurred: Currently Section I, does not clearly state that all the design
formulas throughout this Code represent dimensions in the corrode and/or eroded condition,
PG-16.7 was added. The ASME publisher proposed that Endnote 13 be moved into to the
definitions of t and tn in PG-33.3, and remove Endnote 13. Since PG-16.7 clarifies corrosion
and/or erosion in the design formulas it was felt that further clarification regarding corrosion and
erosion allowances with respect to the minimum nozzle neck thickness was needed, so PG-43
was revised.
What was affected: Paragraphs PW-54.1, PW-54.2, PW-54.3, and PW-54.4
What was changed: PW-54.1 was revised to clarify that welded pressure parts are to be
subjected to the hydrostatic test with the completed boiler as required by UG-99. PW-54.2 and
PW-54.3 was revised by replacing the word “part” with “boiler”. PW-54.4 is a new paragraph
that provides guidelines to manufactures when supplying repaired or replacement parts.
Why the change occurred: For many years, the issue of whether repair or replacement
parts supplied to users of existing boilers require a hydrostatic test at 1.5 times the boiler MAWP
has gone unresolved. In the earliest editions of the Code, when the rules for power boilers,
heating boilers and pressure vessels were contained in one book, it was clear that any
reference to parts was to those parts that were to be included in the construction of a new
boiler. At that time, rules regarding hydrostatically testing of individual parts in the shop
pertained primarily to sections of cast iron, low pressure steam and hot water boilers. In all
cases, however, every newly completed boiler had to be subjected to a hydrostatic test. As the
Code evolved, some wording was removed from Section I and placed in new Code sections
such as Section IV (1923) and Section VIII (1925). The existing wording in PW-54 has been
carried over from previous versions and is considered by some as being an example of having
9
“a belt and suspenders” in emphasizing that pressure parts used in a newly constructed boiler
must be subjected to the hydrostatic test required of a completed boiler. Please refer to Item 13-
942 for the proposed intent interpretation regarding hydrostatic tests of parts.
What was affected: Paragraph PL-30.4, Figure PL-30.4, and Table PL-30.4
What was changed: PL-30.4 is a new paragraph for Section I. It allows for staybolts to be
attached by fillet welds in locomotive boilers as long as certain conditions are met. Figure PL-
30.4 and Table PL-30.4 are also new additions to the Code.
Why the change occurred: The committee decided it needed rules covering the attachment
of staybolts by fillet welds.
What was changed: Table PW-39-5 deals with the mandatory requirements for PWHT of
pressure parts and attachments made from P-No. 15E material. This table received two
different revisions. First, the Code lowered the PWHT temperature from 1350°F to 1300°F for
this type of material. Second, note (1) was revised to say that the PWHT temperature
requirement was reduced from 1325°F to 1250°F for P-No. 15E material 1/2 in. or less in
thickness.
Why the change occurred: The reason for these changes is to safely increase the spread
in PWHT temperature to avoid overshooting the maximum PWHT temperature, while achieving
the same service performance results. EPRI has performed extensive testing and showed no
loss in service performance with a lower minimum PWHT temperature. In addition, previous
work by ORNL indicated a 1300 minimum PWHT temperature was satisfactory.
What was changed: Table PW-39-1 deals with mandatory requirements for PWHT of
pressure parts and attachments of P-No. 1 materials. This table was revised to add a new
General Note (a) to the 2017 edition of the Code. General Note (b) was also revised in this
edition of the Code.
Why the change occurred: A technical review was conducted by a Task Group under
SGM/SG F&E of BPV I to determine if revisions are necessary for Table PW-39-1 to harmonize
with B31.1 and Section VIII, Div. 1. The rationale for this revision is to better harmonize with
Section VIII, Div. 1 and B31.1 PWHT exemptions only for carbon steel materials. The Group 1
carbon steels exhibit lower yield and tensile strength values as a group, and are more forgiving
in relation to the higher strength carbon steels in Group 2 and Group 3. For Section I, the action
is to exempt from PWHT only Group 1 base materials regardless of nominal thickness.
10
What was affected: Paragraph PW-16.5
What was changed: This paragraph was revised to add a reference to ASME B16.11, Table
8, for fitting sizes smaller than NPS 1/2.
Why the change occurred: This item resulted from an interpretation. The inquirer for that
item wished to attach fittings smaller than NPS 1/2. Section I restricts the attachment grove weld
to the thickness of Schedule 160. Schedule 160 does not exist for pipe sizes smaller than NPS
1/2. A revision is needed to address attaching fittings smaller than NPS 1/2.
What was affected: Paragraph PG-106.5 & PG-106.6
What was changed: These paragraphs were revised to allow the application of the
Certification Mark by other methods than those mentioned as long as the markings are clearly
legible.
Why the change occurred: This change was brought on by an interpretation. The
interpretation number was 15-305. The Conformity Assessment Board reviewed and agreed to
allow the marking to be applied by another method as long as the markings are legible.
What was affected: Preamble
What was changed: In previous editions of Section I, the preamble spoke to allowing the
certification mark to be applied to piping beyond the scope of Section I. These words have
been removed from the 2017 edition of Section I.
Why the change occurred: Section I, Preamble contains words limiting Code activities,
specifically Conformity Assessment activities, beyond the scope of Section I. These words were
added to the Preamble sometime between the 1962 and 1968 Editions and have resulted in
numerous questions and inquiries as to their intent or meaning. With the passage of
interpretation item 16-1626 which responded to the question of did Section I prohibit application
of the ASME Certification Mark to nonboiler external piping, NBEP (e.g.. piping beyond Section I
scope) with an answer of "No". The second question also indicated Section I has no prohibitions
to use of the Form P-4A with some indication in the remarks section of the piping being NBEP.
These questions and replies focused on non-Section I piping being designed to the construction
rules of B31.1 Power Piping, however, this piping could also be constructed to other Codes and
Standards for example B31.3, British Standard BS 806, or the Australian Pressure Piping Code
as examples of other possible construction configurations. The committee did not want the
certification mark on these types of situation, so they decided the best route was to remove the
words allowing this to happen.
11
What was affected: Paragraphs A-302.11, PW-28.4, and PB-29.3
What was changed: A-302.11 was revised to reference the applicable paragraphs in Section
I regarding retention of records. Paragraphs PW-28.4 and PW-29.3 were revised to require
retention of qualification maintenance records for no more than five years.
Why the change occurred: As a “rule of thumb”, certificate review team leaders do not
review continuity records established prior to the last triennial review. However, because there
is no established retention period for continuity records, the Certificate Holder may be expected
to retain continuity records from the date of initial qualification onward. This can be as long as
10 to 20 years, or longer. This is an unnecessary burden on the Certificate Holders. Verification
of employed welders’ and brazers’ continuity maintenance dating back longer than five years is
not needed to assure safety. By requiring welders and brazers to be qualified in accordance
with Section IX, Section I has built-in safeguards when a welder’s or brazer’s skill comes into
question. Section IX requires qualifications to be revoked when there is specific reason to
question the person’s ability to meet the specification requirements.
Section IV
Record Number: 11-1347 & 15-215
What was affected: Paragraph HG-100, Mandatory Appendix 10
What was changed: Subparagraph (a) was revised to include boilers equipped with
Economizers and introduces Mandatory Appendix 10, Requirements for Feedwater
Economizers. Subparagraph (b) revised to provide more guidance on design options such as
FEA and other Codes, and proof testing.
Why the change occurred: Section IV has added requirements for feedwater economizers
that are supplied with the boiler. These requirements are found in the new Mandatory Appendix
10. The Appendix doesn’t say anything about aftermarket economizers but jurisdictions could
mandate this appendix for that application. (Record 11-1347)
Section IV has further defined how engineers may design to Code when Section IV doesn’t
address a particular circumstance to include appropriate analytical methods (FEA), appropriate
sections of other Codes and proof testing. The key being providing a design “…as safe as
that…” provided by the rules of Section IV. That means with the same design margin or factor of
safety. (Record 15-215)
12
Record Number: 11-1347, 14-2139, 15-2439, and 16-2067
What was affected: Paragraph HG-530 & HG-531
What was changed: 11-1347 adds Feedwater Economizers to the title of the paragraph,
adds a Mandatory Appendix for Feed water Economizers, and revised form H-3 to address
Feedwater Economizers. See HG 100 also. 14-2139 adds surface conditioning and QA
Program requirements when etched markings are used on nameplates or boiler surfaces. 15-
2439 incorporates Code Case 2813 requirements for Laser marking (annealing) nameplates or
shells of boilers. 16-2067 Several actions dealing with clarifying the definition of a modular
boiler, inspection openings for modular boilers, pressure gages, stop valves. See HG-330, HG-
607, HG615, HG-710, HG-716, and E-100.
Why the change occurred: The main impact for most boiler manufacturers will be the new
H-3 Data Report due to the inclusion of Feedwater Economizers. The National Board will have
an easy way to know if you are using the new forms when registering. Of course if you laser
mark, use an etchant or make modular boilers, you should review the changes carefully and in
the case of etched markings, your QC Manual will need to be revised.
What was affected: Paragraph HG-540
What was changed: HG-540.2 through 540.8 was revised. Most of the administrative
requirements having to do with accreditation including AI, CI, and QC Manuals have been put in
to CA-1, a Conformity Assessment Procedure referenced in Section IV Mandatory App 2.
Certificate Holders should acquire and review CA-1 and QAI-1 now to ensure that changes
haven’t been made in those documents that could affect their QC Program. Currently, having
reviewed both CA-1 and QAI-1 for Certified Individual requirements against the 2015 Edition,
there are no changes. Going forward, that may not be true.
Why the change occurred: This change represents a major step in removing what ASME
considers the administrative requirements from all the Codes, not just Section IV. These
requirements will now be found in Conformity Assessment Procedure 1 (CAP-1) and in QAI-1 in
some cases. The reason for this is to permit other countries to adopt an ASME Code as their
National Code and not have all the “American” requirements in there. You will need to buy this
book for your Joint Review.
What was affected: Paragraph HLW-401
What was changed: The new paragraphs add familiar tolerances to butt joints and rolled
cylinders. HLW-401.3 adds alignment tolerances for longitudinal and circumferential joints.
HLW-401.4 adds requirements for out of roundness of rolled cylinders. Calling this distortion is
not really accurate, but drawings and shop practices should be reviewed to ensure compliance.
13
Paragraph HLW-401.3 was revised to cover alignment tolerances, and in HLW-401.4 distortion
tolerances were also added in.
Why the change occurred: Throughout various ASME Codes Section, there are very
similar requirements for alignment tolerances and out of roundness tolerances, however Part
HLW does not contain any such requirements. There is no guidance for water heater or storage
tank Manufacturers to apply when faced with conditions of butt weld misalignment or shell out-
of-roundness. Including provisions for alignment and out-of-roundness based on existing
Section IV text provides this guidance with familiar requirements. A new HLW-401.3 Alignment
Tolerance and new HLW-401.4 Distortion are added to Part HLW. The text for these new
paragraphs were based on the existing HW-812 and HW-813 respectively.
What was affected: Mandatory Appendix 2, Table 2-100
What was changed: Table 2-100 was revised to include an entry for CA-1. This is the
conformity assessment requirement procedures. This document details the process of attaining
and retaining your ASME Certificates of Authorization. It is very important to have a copy and
read it. The success of your next Joint Review could depend on it.
Why the change occurred: The new ASME CA-1 Standard has been developed by the C-
CAR Standards Committee to uniformly address conformity assessment requirements of the
ASME Boiler &Pressure Vessel Codes. Action is now required to incorporate reference to the
CA-1 Standard and remove requirements from the book section that are now covered by ASME
CA-1. The separation of conformity assessment from technical requirements of the book
sections has been endorsed by the TOMC and S&C Council.
Section V
Record Number: 15-252, 16-1186
What was affected: Article 4, Revisions to Table IV-422 in Mandatory Appendix IV and Table
V-422 in Mandatory Appendix V, updated the Essential Variable for Wedge Parameters
What was changed: The revisions will change “wedge angle” to wedge cut angle” and add
more essential variables for wedges.
Why the change occurred: Currently the only wedge essential variable is the “wedge
angle” in Table IV-422 and “wedge natural refracted angle” in Table V-422. These do not fully
cover the essential parameters associated with phased array wedges, or even properly define
the wedge angle (natural refracted angle is different for different materials under examination).
Record Number: 14-1755, 12-1443
What was affected: Article 4; Revise T-434.1.2, to add rules for Alternative Materials for
Calibration Blocks
14
What was changed: Paragraph T-434.1.2 revised to add a subparagraph (c) which contains
the requirements for the use of a basic calibration block manufactured from a different product
form material or has a different heat treatment the component to be examined.
Why the change occurred: Currently Article 4 paragraph T-434.1.2 has no requirements for
the use of alternative calibration blocks which were manufactured from a different product form
or does not have the same heat treatment as the component to be examined. This revision will
add the necessary rules so that alternative calibration blocks may be used.
What was affected: This item incorporates into Section V, Article 1, T-110 Scope, two
additional paragraphs, which address the Effective Code Edition date as well as Code Case
use. Current language was borrowed from the 2015 Edition of Section IX in Paragraph QG-100
Scope and modified as appropriate to fit the requirements of Section V.
What was changed: Added two new paragraphs to T-110. Paragraph T-110(c) addresses
effective date of new Editions of Section V. Paragraph T-110(d) addresses the use of Code
Cases.
Why the change occurred: Include language into Section V to address the Effective Date
for both the Code Edition and Code Cases, which previously existed in the Foreword
What was affected: Article 6; Use of Water Washable Penetrant in the Solvent Removable
Technique
What was changed: Revised T-673.1 to permit dry wiping followed by water-moistened
wiping as an alternative to water spray for removing excess water-washable penetrant, and
made an editorial change to T673.3.
Why the change occurred: Two separate comparison tests using visible (red dye), water-
washable penetrant were conducted by BPV members. The first test used an aluminum cracked
block and showed dry wiping followed by water-moistened wiping to be just as effective as
water spray for removing excess water-washable penetrant. The second test used a 20-micron
crack panel and showed the dry wipe process to be slightly better than the water spray process.
Two photos from each test are included under Background Material (click View/Manage File
Attachments for access to all 4 photos).
Record Number: 15-259, 15-2688, 16-1004, 15-2665, 16-1725, 16-1726
What was affected: Multiple Revisions to Article 11, to update rules for acoustic emission.
What was changed: Paragraph T-1110, T-1120, T-1122, Table T-1121, T-1123, T-1124, T-
1127, T-1130, T-1171 thru T-1173, T-1181, T-1183, Fig. T-1173(a)(1) & (a)(2) & (b)1), Table T-
1181.
15
Why the change occurred: General realignment to bring into agreement 2w3ith other
documents.
Multiple ASTM Standards were either updated or added.
Section VIII, Division 1

What was affected: Table U-3
What was changed: Table U-3 was revised to include an entry for CA-1. This is the
conformity assessment requirement procedures. This document details the process of attaining
and retaining your ASME Certificates of Authorization. It is very important to have a copy and
read it. The success of your next Joint Review could depend on it.
Why the change occurred: The new ASME CA-1 Standard has been developed by the C-
CAR Standards Committee to uniformly address conformity assessment requirements of the
ASME Boiler &Pressure Vessel Codes. Action is now required to incorporate reference to the
CA-1 Standard and remove requirements from the book section that are now covered by ASME
CA-1. The separation of conformity assessment from technical requirements of the book
sections has been endorsed by the TOMC and S&C Council.
What was affected: Table U-3
What was changed: Table U-3 was revised to remove the reference to SNT-TC-1A and CP-
105.
Why the change occurred: The expertise for determining the necessary requirements to be
applied when qualifying and certifying personnel for conducting NDE examination lies with the
Nondestructive Examination Standards Committee. Rather than reviewing and accepting each
new iteration of SNT-TC-1A or CP-105 as it is published, it makes more sense to simply
reference Section V, Article 1, T-120(e),(f), (g), (h), or (i) as applicable for NDE personnel
qualification and certification requirements.
What was affected: Paragraph UG-10
What was changed: The paragraph was revised to allow only the manufacturer to recertify
material not recognized by Section VIII, Division 1. All of UG-10 was revised to clarify the
recertification process.
16
Why the change occurred: It was agreed to delete the current provision of allowing non-
Certificate Holders ( i.e. material suppliers, stockists, warehouses) to recertify under UG-
10(a)(1), which is the only provision for such (UG-10(b)&(c) are only permitted for Certificate
Holders). This would make this portion of the recertification process a Common Rule with
Section VIII, Division 2 paragraph 3.2.12.
What was affected: Paragraph UG-35 and Nonmandatory Appendix FF
What was changed: The paragraph was revised to redefine and update rules for “quick-
actuating closures”. Also a new paragraph UG-35.3, was added to include the new rules for
“quick-actuating closures”. Nonmandatory Appendix FF was revised to address both “quick-
actuating closures” and “quick-opening closures”.
Why the change occurred: It is desired to strengthen the Code requirements for quick-
actuating and quick-opening closures due to the continuation of safety events in multiple
industries. UG-35.2 is modified to specifically address quick-actuating closures while a new UG-
35.3 is created to address quick-opening closures. Appendix FF has been updated to address
the needs of both quick-actuating and quick-opening closures.
What was affected: Paragraph UG-36, 1-9, and 1-10
What was changed: The paragraph was revised to remove the reference to paragraphs 1-9
and 1-10 as alternative rules for reinforcement calculations. Paragraphs 1-9 and 1-10 were
deleted in their entirety.
Why the change occurred: The nozzle design method of Appendix 1-10 is permitted to be
used in lieu of the rules in UG-37 and Appendix 1-7 (for large openings) as applicable.
However, the method of Appendix 1-10 has been updated and improved (WRC 529) to its
current state which is now located in ASME Section VIII Division 2, Part 4.5. Therefore, the
rules of Appendix 1-10 will be removed from Appendix 1 in the 2017 edition of Section VIII,
Division 1. Appendix 1-9, is based on burst tests and provides some of the verification data.
The nozzle design method of this appendix (with its many geometric limitations) is also
permitted to be used in lieu of the rules of UG-37 and Appendix 1-7 as applicable. However,
with the adoption of the updated nozzle rules of ASME Section VIII, Division 2 Part 4.5,
Appendix 1-9 will be removed in the 2017 edition of Section VIII, Division 1.
What was affected: Paragraph UG-84
What was changed: Paragraph UG-84(h)(3) was revised to address testing requirements for
impact test qualifications of multiple welding process procedures. A new subparagraph, UG-
84(h)(5) was also added to address these requirements as well.
17
Why the change occurred: The Code words do not specifically require a separate set of
weld metal and HAZ toughness test specimens be removed from each location where a
different welding process has been applied. I believe the application of these requirements to
the qualification of a WPS using multiple welding processes had not been considered when
these requirements were originally put into the Code. These Code revisions address such
considerations, and also exempt impact test requirements for an individual welding process
within a WPS having multiple welding processes when the maximum obtainable specimen width
along the notch is less than 0.099 in (2.5 mm).
What was affected: Paragraphs UG-116, UG-117, UG-118, UG-120, UHT-115, ULW-90,
UIG-116, UIG-120, Appendix 10-5, Appendix W, and Appendix DD
What was changed: A new Certificate of Authorization is established for organizations

fabricating parts without design responsibility.
Why the change occurred: Organizations fabricating parts are currently required to
demonstrate design capabilities and are required to obtain separate ASME Certificates of
Authorization for fabricating parts under each section of the boiler code. The proposed program
will permit organizations that fabricate parts and do not perform or take design responsibility to
obtain ASME certification. The new certificate program will also recognize authorization to
fabricate parts for multiple Code Sections based on demonstrated capabilities.
What was affected: Paragraph UG-120, Appendix 3, and Appendix 10
What was changed: Paragraph UG-120(c) was revised by adding requirements for transfer
of parts between Certificate Holders within the same organization. A new endnote was added
to this paragraph describing the word “organization” that is used in this paragraph. Appendix 3
was revised to include a new definition for completed pressure vessel and for pressure vessel
part. Lastly, Appendix 10 was revised to include a new clause, 10-13(b)(15).
Why the change occurred: This item is intended to allow completely welded pressure
vessels that have not been hydrostatically tested and/or not received a final inspection to be
transferred between “sister” companies with a partial data report.
What was affected: Paragraph UW-2
What was changed: This paragraph was revised to exempt lethal service butt welds in
stiffening rings designed per UG-29 from radiographic examination.
Why the change occurred: This revision clarifies the intent that butt welds under
compression in stiffening rings designed per UG-29 (external pressure service) do not require
18
radiographic examination, but the revisions did leave the radiography requirements intact for
stiffening rings which are loaded in tension.
What was affected: Paragraph UW-13 and Mandatory Appendix 28
What was changed: Paragraph UW-13 was revised with the provisions of Mandatory
Appendix 28. A new paragraph was added to UW-13, UW-13(f), that include the provisions of
Mandatory Appendix 28. The rest of UW-13 was re-lettered to account for the new paragraph.
Mandatory Appendix 28 will be deleted from the 2017 edition of Section VIII, Division 1.
Why the change occurred: Mandatory Appendix 28 was established to allow air cooled
heat exchanger designers/manufactures to apply alternative rules to their designs. The
committee has now decided that these rules can now be moved into the main body of the Code.
What was affected: Paragraph UW-9
What was changed: This paragraph was revised to redesignate the paragraphs within UW-
9. Paragraph UW-9(c) is redesignated as UW-9(c)(1) in the 2017 edition of Section VIII,
Division 1. Also, UW-9(c)(2) is added to the main paragraph in the new edition of Section VIII,
Division 1. Lastly, a new Figure UW-9.1 was also added to the newest edition of Section VIII,
Division 1.
Why the change occurred: When flanges or pipe are butt welded to thickened neck nozzles
that have a tapered transition from the thickened neck to the nozzle neck less than 71.5° (3:1)
the minimum distance from the end of the taper to the flange attachment weld is not addressed.
This change addresses this particular instance in fabrication. Division 1 requires a 3:1 minimum
taper (71.5°) at welds between components of differing thicknesses but also allows the taper on
thickened neck nozzles to be as small as 30°.
What was affected: Paragraph UCS-68
What was changed: This paragraph has been revised by reformatting it into two
subparagraphs, UCS-68(b)(2)(-a) and UCS-68(b)(2)(-b). Existing requirements of UCS-68(b)(2)
have been retained and the new UCS-68(b)(2)(-b) clarifies that PWHT is not mandatory for tube
to tube sheet seal welds defined per UW-20.2(c).
Why the change occurred: In the 2015 edition of Section VIII, Division 1, UCS-68(b)(2)
doesn’t clearly state whether or not a tube to tubesheet seal weld made in accordance with UW-
20.2(c) would qualify for PWHT exemption under the conditions stated in UCS-68(b)(2).
19
What was affected: Paragraph UHA-51
What was changed: UHA-51(a)(3) was revised to increase the FN limit of 316L
Why the change occurred: The current revision to paragraph UHA-51(a)(4) to add type
308L filler metal to UHA-51(a)(4)(-a) has prompted a further review of the original impact test
date and later impact test data on type 316L weld metals. The committee believes that the
currently available impact test date on type 316L justifies the increase of the maximum FN = 5
to FN = 10 for type 316L filler metals.
Section VIII, Div. 2

What was affected: Paragraph 1.2.1.2
What was changed: Two vessel classes will be added in 2017 Edition of Section VIII Division
2
Class 1 vessels have a Design Margin of 3.0, which is the same as 2004 Edition of
Section VIII Division 2
Class 2 vessels have a Design Margin of 2.4, which is the same as 2015 Edition of
Section VIII Division 2
For both classes the toughness, material, design, fabrication and examination
requirements are essentially the same
For Class 1 vessels certification of the User’s Design Specification is only required if a fatigue
analysis is necessary
For Class 1 vessels certification of the Manufacturer’s Design Report is only required if Part 5
(Design-by-Analysis) is used to determine the pressure thickness of a component not covered
by Part 4 (Design-by-Rule) and/or if a fatigue analysis is required.
For Class 2 certification of the User’s Design Specification and Manufacturer’s
Design Report is required, same as requirement as in 2015 Edition.
The introduction of Class 1 vessels in Section VIII, Division 2 will allow U2
Certificate Holders to design and construct an ASME vessel with a U2 Certification Designator
that is lighter than a Section VIII, Division 1 vessel but without all of the requirements of a 2
Class 2 vessel.
Class 1 vessels will also provide a means for Certificate Holders to build a vessel to a
User’s Design Specification without needing to go to a full Section VIII, Division 2
Class 2 vessel design.
20
What was affected: Paragraph 1.2.6.1. A new Certificate of Authorization is established for
organizations fabricating parts without design responsibility.
What was changed: Revised 1.2.6(c); 2.3.1.2; 2-C.1.1; Form A-2; 2-F.1; 2-F.3; 2-F.4; Fig. 2-
F.1; 2-G.1; 2-G.4.1; 2-G.5.; 2-Table 2-H.1.
Section VIII, Div. 3

What was affected: Section VIII, Division 3; Revisions to CRPV Sections In Regards To BPV
X Actions
What was changed: Removal of all requirements related to composite material requirements
in Section VIII Division 3 with reference to Section X Appendix 10.
Why the Change Occurred: Section X has developed Appendix 10 which will house the
requirements for the laminate material for CRPV vessels which can be reference for use in
ASME Section VIII Division 3. This item removes these requirements from Section VIII Division
3. Additionally, this item removes the requirement for a CRPV vessel manufacturer to hold both
ASME Section VIII Division 3 and Section X Code stamps. Currently, a manufacturer would be
required to demonstrate the ability to manufacture a complete Section X vessel potentially
without the intent of ever manufacturing one.
What was affected: KG-130 has been expanded to cover code work at Intermediate sites as
well as completion of a coded vessels at a Field Site.
What was changed: Address the quality control system for Code work at Intermediate and
Field sites.
Why the Change Occurred: It has been clear as far as to the activities the Certificate Holder
can perform at a Field Site but did not clearly address an intermediate site, therefore this
change addresses clearly.
In should be noted that in the Tables KM, there were several materials which had the P No.,
Group No. assigned.
21
Section IX
What was affected: Paragraph QW-290
What was changed: This paragraph went under major revisions. Changes to this paragraph
were made to hold hardness testing, toughness testing, and no additional testing independent
and to require the method of acceptance and the acceptance criteria to be specified by the
Construction Code or Design Specification if required to be either hardness testing or toughness
testing. If hardness or toughness testing is not specified then the qualification test requirement
is bend testing per QW-451. Table QW-290.4 was revised to include a new essential variables
column for cases where the Construction Code or Design Specification does not specify or
require hardness or toughness testing.
Why the change occurred: These revisions were brought on by recent concerns with the
previous edition’s rules as they are being used by the industry. The main concern was how to
isolate the hardness acceptance criteria from the toughness acceptance criteria. The two forms
of testing can be unrelated to each other since the microstructure of materials can also be
different. This emphasizes that both forms of testing should not be used as a minimum, but it
should be the decision of the Construction Code or Design Specification on which form of
testing and acceptance criteria should be used.
What was affected: QW/QB-422
What was changed: This table was revised to include all forms of UNS S38815 as P-
Number 8 Group Number 1.
Why the change occurred: Alloy UNS S38815 is a “Super Stainless Steel” primarily used in
the application of sulfuric acid. It has weldability similar to other 300 series stainless steels.
What was affected: QW/QB-422, Nonmandatory Appendix D
What was changed: ASTM A1066 was added to Table QW/QB-422 and Nonmandatory
Appendix D. In Table QW/QB-422, the material was assigned P-Number 3 and the Group
Number is based on the grade of the material.
Why the change occurred: These revisions were brought on by requests made from
industries to assign this material a P-Number.
22
What was changed: SA-240, UNS S44100, has been added to Table QW/QB-422 in the
new edition of Section IX. It also was added to Nonmandatory Appendix D. It was assigned as
a P-Number 7 Group Number 2.
Why the change occurred: This revision was brought on by a request from a Certificate
Holder to assign this material a P-Number.
What was affected: QW/QB-422, Nonmandatory Appendix
What was changed: This table and nonmandatory appendix were revised to include two new
Australian material specifications, AS 1448 and AS 4728. AS 1448 was assigned to P-Number
1 and the Group Number changes based on the type or grade of the material. AS 4728 was
assigned to P-Number 1 Group Number 1.
Why the change occurred: This revision was brought on by a request from a Certificate
Holder to assign these materials a P-Number.
What was affected: QW/QB-422, Nonmandatory Appendix
material specifications, SA-572 and SA-1011. SA-572 was assigned to P-Number 1 and the
Group Number varies based on the material type or grade. SA-1011 was assigned to P-
Number 1 and Group Number also varies based on the type or grade of the material.
Why the change occurred: These revisions were brought on by a request made from the
Section II subcommittee to assign these materials with P-Numbers.
What was changed: This table and nonmandatory appendix were revised to include a new
material specification, SA-10028-3, Type P355NL2. The material was assigned to P-Number 1
and Group Number 1.
Why the change occurred: This revision was brought on by a request made by a Certificate
Holder to assign these materials a P-Number.
23
grade to material specifations SA-240, SA-479, SA-789, and SA-790. The new grade is UNS
S82441. This material was assigned to P-Number 10H and Group Number 1.
Why the change occurred: This revision was brought on by the fact that this material is
included in a Code Case for Section VIII, Division 1. A request was made based on this fact to
add the material to the new edition of Section IX.
What was changed: This table and nonmandatory appendix were revised to include new
grades for material specifications ASTM B725 and ASTM B730. For ASTM B725, the new
grades are UNS N02201 and UNS N04400 which were assigned to P-Number 41 and 42
respectively. For ASTM B730, the new grades are UNS N02200 and UNS N02201 which were
assigned to P-Number 41. Additionally, ASTM B730 also received grade UNS N04400 which
was assigned to P-Number 42.
Why the change occurred: These revisions were brought on by the inclusion of Code Case
2767 into the new edition of Section IX.
grade of SA-240. UNS S43940 was added to SA-240, and it was assigned P-Number 7 and
Group Number 2.
Holder to include the new grade to material specification SA-240.
What was affected: QW-403.16
What was changed: This variable was revised to better clarify the welder qualification limits
for set-on and set-in nozzle or branch connections.
Why the change occurred: The Section IX Committee has issued several interpretations on
this subject, but they have never actually changed the wording in the Code to better clarify their
intensions. In the new edition of Section IX, the changes that have been made will clarify where
to find what a welder’s limit will be based on their weld test.
24
material specification, SA-10028-3 Type P355NH. The new material was assigned to P-
Number 1 and Group Number 2.
Why the change occurred: This revision was brought on by a request made by a Section IX
subcommittee to assign this particular material with a P-Number.
grade of SA-240. UNS S32654 was added to SA-240, and it was assigned P-Number 8 and
Group Number 4.
Holder to include the new grade to material specification SA-240.
grades of SA-240. UNS S82012 and UNS S82031 were added to SA-240, and were assigned
to P-Number 10H and Group Number 1.
Holder to include the two new grades to material specification SA-240.
Section X
What was affected: New Mandatory Appendix 10
What was changed: This new appendix was added for new requirements for laminates with
load sharing metallic shells for high pressure service. This Appendix defines the requirements
for the materials, design, fabrication, qualification, examination and testing of laminates to be
applied as part of the fabrication of Section VIII, Division 3 composite pressure vessels for
storage of fluids at high pressure. This appendix incorporates many of the requirements that
25
were contained in Section VIII, Division 3 and shall only be used per Section VIII, Division 3.
Additionally, the lastest ASTM standard on acoustic emissions testing is incorporated too.
Why the change occurred: The Section X committee saw the need for the requirements for
laminated with load sharing metallic shells, and the previous editions of the Code did not
provide those requirements. The new editions of the Section X will now have applicable rules
for this type of vessel.
What was affected: New Nonmandatory Appendix AK
What was changed: This new appendix adds micromechanics as an alternative method to
testing, for determinging elastic properties of a lamina. This nonmandatory appendix contains
the equations that can be used to predict elastic constants for both unidirectional lamina and for
a randomly distributed reinforced lamina. Determination of the elastic constants using
micromechanics would be permissible as an alternative to determination via testing per RT-7.
Why the change occurred: Manufacturers were being boxed in to only one way of
determining elastic properties of a lamina. The committee for Section X took this into account
and they decided to allow an alternative to testing per RT-7.
What was affected: Paragraph RT-223
What was changed: RT-223 was revised to clarify the temperatures required for cyclic
pressure test and the hydrostatic pressure test. This revision allows a test fluid temperature to
be at least the maximum design temperature of the vessel for the hydrostatic pressure
qualification tests. RT-223.1 and RT-223.5 were reformatted for clarity regarding the
requirements for the cyclic test and the hydrostatic pressure qualification test.
Why the change occurred: Inquiries from manufactures regarding this paragraph revealed
the Code intent is unclear and confusing for the temperature required for the cyclic test and the
temperature required for the hydrostatic pressure test. Colder temperatures are considered a
more difficult hydrostatic test condition. Also, a potential safety concern exists when performing
the high pressure hydrostatic test at high temperatures due to the related steam generated. This
code revision will allow a test fluid temperature to be at least the maximum design temperature
of the vessel for the hydrostatic pressure qualification tests.
What was affected: New Nonmandatory Appendix AL
What was changed: This new nonmandatory appendix provides guidance to owners or
users of Fiber Reinforced Plastic (FRP) pressure vessels to mitigate the effects of fire and
exposure to excessive heat on these types of vessels covered by this Section. FRP vessels
26
generally cannot be protected by an overpressure protection device if exposed to fire since the
laminate will lose structural integrity if exposed to fires within a short amount of time before
pressures in the vessels will increase enough to trip a relief device. This appendix offers some
general guidance on how to protect a Section X vessel before it fails or leaks if exposed to fire.
Why the change occurred: The Section X committee was made aware of instances where
issues were happening with FRP pressure vessel when exposed to flames and excessive heat.
The committee decided to provide some guidance for users of FRP pressure vessel with this
addition to the Code. Since this is a port construction issue, the guidance shows up in a
nonmandatory appendix.
What was affected: Various Paragraphs throughout Section X
What was changed: The ASTM Standard Specification listed in Section X were revised so
the titles reflect the present versions, and the years from which the ASTM Standards were
deleted noting instead that the most recent approved version of the standards apply. Also those
ASTM Standards that were withdrawn were removed from Section X.
Why the change occurred: It was brought to the attention of the Section X committee that
some of the ASTM Standards listed in this section were incorrect. They made the necessary
changes to correct this.
What was affected: Paragraph RT-6
What was changed: This paragraph was revised and now references ASTM E1067
Standard Practice for Acoustic Emission Examination of Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic Resin
(FRP) Tanks/Vessels.
Why the change occurred: The ASTM standard is being adopted to take advantage of the
most up-to-date standard for acoustic emission. The current procedure from Section V is out of
date. The need to reference the most up to date standard is critical for the integrity of Class II
vessels.
27
Section XII
What was affected: New Nonmandatory Appendix K
What was changed: This nonmandatory appendix was added to provide recommended
minimum preheat temperatures for various materials. The temperatures are provided as a
general guide for the materials listed by P-Numbers in Section IX. The user is cautioned that
the preheating temperatures listed do not necessarily insure satisfactory completion of the weld
joint and requirements for individual materials with the P-Number listing may have preheat
requirements more or less restrictive than this nonmandatory appendix.
Why the change occurred: The Section XII committee decided to add in minimum preheat
number for its Code users as a convenience. Section VIII, Division 1 has a similar
nonmandatory appendix R that gives the same information.
What was affected: Paragraph TG-110.2
What was changed: This paragraph was revised to show an internal pressure range from full
vacuum to 207 bar (3,000 psi) for vessels within the scope of Section XII.
Why the change occurred: Due to inquiries from manufactuers, the Section XII committee
realized that the intent of this paragraph can be confusing. In US customary, full vacuum to
3,000 psig or psi gage is quite clear. In SI metric, the units are not consistent : 207 bar = 3,000
psi therefore it means that the bar are bar gage. On the other hand 0 for full vacuum means 0
bar absolute. To clear up the intent, the committee decided to make the above change.
28

Technical Service Bulletin 2017 ASME Synopsis Executive Summary

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Technical Service Bulletin 2017 ASME Synopsis Executive Summary

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

ONECIS INSURANCE COMPANY

2017 ASME Code Edition Synopsis

Commentary on revisions represents OneCIS Insurance Company’s opinion of the changes,

Any questions or comments on this document may be directed to:

Gary Brouette…………(281)-310-3123 gary.brouette@onecis.com (Section III)

Section I – Power Boilers…………………………………………………...3

Section IV – Heating Boilers…………………………………………….....12

Section V – Nondestructive Examination………………………………...14

Section VIII, Division 1 – Pressure Vessels…………………………......16

Section VIII, Division 2 – Pressure Vessels, Alternative Rules……….20

Section VIII, Division 3 – Alt. Rules for High Pressure Vessels……….21

Section IX – Welding and Brazing Qualifications………………………..18

Section X – Fiber-Reinforced Plastic Pressure Vessels………………...22

Section XII – Rules for Construction and Continued Service

Code Revisions by Sections

Record Number: 09-1324

What was affected: Paragraphs PG-72.3, PG-72.4, and PG-73.8

Record Number: 10-854

Record Number: 11-819

What was affected: Paragraphs PG-67.2, PG-67.2.1.6, PG-69.1.1, PG-69.1.4, PG-69.1.5,

Record Number: 11-1071

What was affected: Part PL, Paragraph PL-54

Record Number: 13-129

Record Number: 13-447

Record Number: 13-1489

What was affected: Paragraph PG-75 General

Record Number: 14-207

What was affected: Paragraph PG-77

Record Number: 14-799

What was affected: Table PW-39-8

Record Number: 14-1901

What was affected: Paragraph PW-51.4

Record Number: 14-2209

What was affected: Paragraphs PG-25.2.4 & PW-50

Record Number: 14-2327

What was affected: Non-mandatory Appendix D

What was affected: Paragraph PG-50

Record Numbers: 14-2420, 15-1371, AND 16-1099

What was affected: All Manufacturers’ Data Reports

Record Number: 15-337

What was affected: Paragraphs PG-16.7, PG-33.3, and PG-43

Record Number: 15-353

What was affected: Paragraphs PW-54.1, PW-54.2, PW-54.3, and PW-54.4

Record Number: 15-1564

What was affected: Table PW-39-5

Record Number: 15-1826

What was affected: Table PW-39-1

Record Number: 15-2054

What was affected: Paragraph PW-16.5

Record Number: 15-2912

What was affected: Paragraph PG-106.5 & PG-106.6

Record Number: 16-1331

What was affected: Preamble

Record Number: 16-1500

What was affected: Paragraphs A-302.11, PW-28.4, and PB-29.3

Record Number: 11-1347 & 15-215

What was affected: Paragraph HG-100, Mandatory Appendix 10

Record Number: 11-1347, 14-2139, 15-2439, and 16-2067

What was affected: Paragraph HG-530 & HG-531

Record Number: 12-1931

What was affected: Paragraph HG-540

Record Number: 14-1449

What was affected: Paragraph HLW-401

Record Number: 12-1931