Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
CORE ABILITIES
LEVEL 1
FOR
CORE ABILITIES
LEVEL 1
No part of this publication may be produced, stored in data base, retrieval system, or in
any form by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise
without prior written permission from Department of Skills Development (DSD)
GLOSSARY & ABBREVIATION
GLOSSARY
Honesty Scrupulous with regard to telling the truth and acting without
stealing, fraud or breach of laws.
Integrity The quality of being honest and having strong moral principles.
Skill The learn ability to carry out a task with pre-determined results
often within a given amount of time, energy or both.
Work ethics Value of a hard work and diligence, and its inherent ability to
strengthen character.
Working manual A document that describes in detail the process and systems
that a company uses to produce its goods and provide its
services.
Standard Content
8 Core Ability Profile Chart (CPC) 1
9 Core Ability Profile (CP) 2-6
1. INTRODUCTION
The NCS comprises the skills a person must be able to demonstrate, as defined by the
industry with other various qualifications, in alignment with the Malaysian Qualification
Framework guidelines. The NCS is a minimum specification of performance that an
individual must have to be competent with the knowledge and skill set needed when
managing a function at the workplace to meet the standard requirements. The NCS is used
as a reference for the industry, the career path of a skilled worker, training purposes and as
a benchmark for performance. The NCS development process and document structure
reflects the certification system that will be beneficial to the Malaysian workforce. The NCS
document consists of three segments, Standard Practice (SP), Standard Content (SC) and
Curriculum Competency of Core Ability (CoCA).
The NCS document serves as a guideline to module developers and trainers who are
responsible for the development of Instructional Manuals and/or Written Instructional
Materials (WIM) refer to Z-009 program under the National Competency Standards with the
Department of Skills Development, Ministry of Human Resource Malaysia. The document
contains the following:
• Information on the training modules titles to be conducted and the sequence of the
learning delivery, for the learner to achieve the required skill competency.
• A set of abilities that provides a comprehensive description of the knowledge to be
delivered for each training module.
• Information pertaining to the scope and coverage of knowledge to be delivered and the
abilities to be demonstrated.
• Methodology to assist module developers and trainers in course planning, training
implementation, evaluation and monitoring the effectiveness of course delivery.
• Methodology to assess the understanding of knowledge delivered.
• Guidelines to conduct assessment in determining competency achievement by trainees.
• New methodology in assisting module developers and trainers on developing
instructional manuals or Written Instructional Manuals (WIM).
The development of National Occupational Skill Standards (NOSS) and the growing
acceptance of Competency-Based Training and Education (CBTE) in Malaysia’s training
institutions have resulted in the decision to identify skills or abilities that are generic to many
jobs and professions in all areas of industry. In Malaysia, the word ‘skill’ is often
misinterpreted in vocational education, and is usually defined as physical skills. Therefore,
the term Core Abilities (CA) is used to replace the generic skills. These “generic skills” have
been identified as the learning tools, or enabling requirements, which can assist the trainee
in the acquiring and applying subject or job specific knowledge skills and comprehension to
i
his work. Incorporating CA into training provides realistic outcomes that can make learning
more relevant and add to the trainee’s sense of achievement.
CA is a mandatory core learning program for candidate certification, effective from 1st June,
2006. CA should be used as complement to the NOSS program to help workers in Malaysia
be more relevant and competitive in this era of globalization. The CA program incorporates
generic skills that every employee should possess for performance. The CA are learning
tools, supporting the NOSS requirement, which assists the trainee in acquiring, applying
comprehensive and recommended soft skill knowledge for work. The CA are considered
essential for effective participation in the emerging work patterns of work and work
organizations, focussing on capacity to apply knowledge and skills in an integrated way in
work situations. The CA is broad in nature applying to work generally, rather than being
specific to work in particular occupations, jobs or industries.
This new Level 1 NCS document supports NOSS in related industrial sectors. CA were
developed as a supplement to the development of Malaysian National Occupational Skill
Standards (NOSS) for various fields, with reference to overseas sources (Australia, Canada,
Germany, UK and USA) and NCS-CA brainstorming sessions. A number of experts from
various industries were assembled to identify, formulate, conclude and recommend
essential CA in work place requirements. Advancing towards the goal of becoming a fully-
developed high income nation by the year 2020, Malaysia requires minimum 50 percent
certified skilled workforce. Thus, there is an increasing need for the development of CA to
support the industrial based skill standards for various industries in Malaysia.
The four main CA essential to one’s success in obtaining and performing jobs, were
identified to meet the nation’s vision and mission on human resource development which
are:
These abilities are considered essential and are generally relevant to all related services
and production industries. The CA gives added values to the labour market, as employers
prefer to hire and promote individuals who can communicate clearly, act responsibly, think
critically, act creatively, adapt to change, demonstrate integrity, work cooperatively and
productively. This document shows the level of learning for Level 1 CA, providing a
structured set of abilities that enables a person to complete the CA requirement.
ii
Core Abilities (CA) Application
The NOSS programme has a set of CA; generic abilities, including corresponding
performance indicators, learning outcomes and assessment criteria. CA are enabling
requirements needed for the development of specific competencies and they address skills
that can be transferred beyond the context of a specific learning experience. CA are an
important factor in performing jobs effectively and efficiently. CA Performance Indicators
provide observable and measurable criteria, essential for performance assessment. CA are
incorporated into the learning activity, describing how learners will learn specific
competencies. The ability assessment activities inform learners how they will demonstrate
capabilities when performing jobs.
The NCS-CA benefits all stakeholders, including Industry Key Players, Training
Organizations, Regulatory Bodies, etc. The success of the skill standards development
project, and its usefulness to the society, depends on the full participation and commitment
of all stakeholders. The benefits can be used as a benchmark for evaluating the
effectiveness of collaborative skills.
A. Employers Benefits
B. Workers Benefits
i. Soft skill standards assist workers in selecting career choices by providing industry
expectations for success in the workplace.
ii. In addition, standards-based curriculum and assessments provide workers with
credentials that certify work-readiness.
iii. Workers can accurately assess their soft skills required for career advancement and
can effectively plan their career pathways.
iv. Workers can determine the soft skills and abilities needed for advancement or transfer
within industries, and determine the continuous learning and training needed to
upgrade their skills.
v. Workers can achieve clarity regarding what they are expected to learn and how to
prepare for work.
vi. Enter and re-enter the workforce with better control of their choices of higher paying
jobs that require higher soft skills.
vii. Improve mobility and portability of their credentials.
iii
1.3 Training programme Pre-requisite
Entry requirement to Level 1 NCS-CA, is based on related NOSS Level 1 job areas.
CA Structure is a table showing the level of learning for CA for various NOSS job
areas/titles. This table describes the CA for Level 1 to 5 according to NOSS framework
definition.
ALL CHEMICAL
SUB SECTOR FORENSIC SCIENCE
SUBSECTORS ANALYSIS
LEVEL 1
Core Abilities NIL NIL
Note: Table above shows how CA are incorporated into NOSS job area according to respective
level
iv
2.2 CORE ABILITIES STRUCTURE FOR LEVEL 1 TO 5
v
3. DEFINITION OF COMPETENCY LEVELS
The NOSS is developed for various occupational areas. Candidates for certification must be
assessed and trained at certain levels to substantiate competencies. The structure of NCS-
CA follows the Malaysian Qualification Framework,as defined by the Department of Skills
Development, Ministry of Human Resources, Malaysia.
The ability levels in CA complies with competency levels in NOSS.The NCS-CA levels are
infused as follows:
vi
4. OCCUPATIONAL ABILITIES
This section lists the organizations (Regulatory Body & Industrial Association) related to the
NCS as referred sources for industrial information, such as statistics, regulations, skills
workforce, legislative requirements, etc. These organisations are as listed below:
vii
• Sustainable Energy Development Authority MALAYSIA (SEDA)
Galeria PjH, Aras 9, Jalan P4W, Persiaran Perdana,
Presint 4, 62100 Putrajaya,
MALAYSIA
Tel: 603-8870 5800
Fax: 603-8870 5900
Email : fit@seda.gov.my
viii
• National Centre for Vocational Educational Research (NCVER)
Level II, 33 King William Street,
Adelaide 5000
South Australia
PO Box 8288 Station Arcade
Adelaide 5000
South Australia
Tel: + 61 8 8230 8400
Fax: +61 8 8212 3436
Email : ncver@ncver.edu.au
Website : http://www.ncver.edu.au
• Ministry of Education
Level 1, Block E8, Kompleks E
Pusat Pentadbiran Kerajaan Persekutuan
62604, Putrajaya, Malaysia
Tel: 03-8884 8000
Fax :03-8888 8001
Email: 80008000@1mocc.gov.my
ix
6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The Director General Of DSD would like to extend his gratitude to the organisations and
individuals who has been involved in developing this standard ; especially members of
Standard Technical Evaluation Committee (STEC) for having been involved in developing
and validating this document.
Table 3.0: Assessors for Development and Validation of National Competency Standard
(Level 1)
x
7. NCS-CA DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEMBERS:
List of panel experts or practitioners with their organization and designation is shown
below:
President
1. En. Ismail bin Abdullah
Green Depot Technology Sdn Bhd
Managing Director
3. En. Awaldin Bin Mohd Arif Industrial Testing & Engineering Inspection Sdn
Bhd
Principal Assistance Director
Technical and Vocational Education Sector
4. En. Hamzah Bin Zakaria
Curriculum Development Division
Ministry of Education Malaysia
Prof. Dr. Azlan Jumat Bin Abdul Managing Director
5.
Ghanie Azlan Ghanie (M) Sdn Bhd
Manager
11. Pn. Norhayati Binti Arifin
Akademi KTM (MyRA)
FACILITATOR
xi
B. FOR CORE ABILITIES PROFILE (CP)
List of panel experts or practitioners with their organization and designation is shown
below:
President
1. En. Ismail Bin Abdullah
Green Depot Technology Sdn Bhd
Manager
7. Dr. Norlihawati Binti Hajidan
The Stealth Organisation
Senior Manager
Tn. Syed Abd Ghani Bin Syed
8. ANF Synergy Sdn. Bhd.
Tuan Chek
Manager
9. Pn. Norhayati Binti Arifin
Akademi KTM (MyRA)
xii
C. FOR CURRICULUM OF CORE ABILITIES (CoCA)
List of panel experts or practitioners with their organization and designation is shown
below:
President
1. En. Ismail Bin Abdullah
Green Depot Technology Sdn Bhd
Manager
9. Pn. Norhayati Binti Arifin
Akademi KTM (MyRA)
Manager
11. Dr. Norlihawati Binti Hajidan
The Stealth Organisation
xiii
CORE ABILITY PROFILE CHART (CAPC)
HEALTH, SAFETY
BASIC WORKING PERSONAL WORK PLACE ETHICS AND
CORE COMMUNICATION BEHAVIOUR SKILL AWARENESS ENVIRONMENTAL
AWARENESS
1
CORE ABILITY PROFILE (CP)
2
CA Title CA Code CA Descriptor Ability Performance Indicator
2.7 Good speaking and
listening skill is applied.
2.8 Multicultural sensitivities
are recognised.
2. PERSONAL Z-009- Personal Behaviour Skill describes 1. Demonstrate honesty and 1.1 The concept of honesty and
BEHAVIOUR SKILL 1:2015- the requirement to understand the integrity integrity is determined.
CA02 concept of honesty and integrity, 1.2 Standards Practice and
punctuality of job delivery and work Ethical guideline are
in a team to complete a basic task. adhered.
1.3 Principles of Confidentiality
The person who is competent in this is identified.
CA shall be able to demonstrate 1.4 Good interactions between
honesty and integrity, adopt work peers and superiors are
punctuality and demonstrate team adopted.
cooperation.
2. Adopt work punctuality 2.1 Staff attendance system is
The outcome of this CA is to registered.
demonstrate good attitudes, values 2.2 Work attendance is
and behaviours in the working adhered.
environment. 2.3 Good timekeeping
procedure is followed.
2.4 Punctuality of job delivery is
adhered.
2.5 Work task is accomplished
within an allotted timeframe
3
CA Title CA Code CA Descriptor Ability Performance Indicator
3. Demonstrate team cooperation 3.1 Different roles within a team
are identified.
3.2 Relevant information is
shared with team members.
3.3 Basic problem solving
relevant to work activity is
demonstrated.
3.4 Multicultural is recognised.
3. WORKPLACE ETHICS Z-009- Workplace Ethics Awareness 1 Respond to instructions 1.1 Hierarchy and authority
AWARENESS 1:2015- describes the requirement to follow level is determined.
CA03 the chain of command, adhere to 1.2 Chain of command is
working guidelines, demonstrate followed.
concept of discipline and maintain 1.3 Roles of work process are
good social interactions. followed.
1.4 Instructions to respective
The person who is competent in this parties are relayed.
CA shall be able to respond to
instructions and demonstrate 2 Demonstrate discipline at 2.1 The concept of discipline is
discipline. workplace identified.
2.2 Confidentiality principles
The outcome of this CA is to are determined.
understand the chain of command 2.3 Standards and codes of
and portray good workplace ethics practice are adhered.
behaviour in the working 2.4 Good social interactions at
environment. workplace are adhered.
4
CA Title CA Code CA Descriptor Ability Performance Indicator
4. HEALTH, SAFETY AND Z-009- Health, Safety and Environmental 1. Adhere to health awareness 1.1 Health awareness concept
ENVIRONMENTAL 1:2015- Awareness describes the activity is understood
AWARENESS CA04 requirement to understand and 1.2 Signage related to health is
abide to health, safety and understood
environment awareness information 1.3 Health Act and Regulations
at workplace. is followed.
1.4 Type of hazard identified
The person who is competent in this 1.5 Work instruction, safe
CA shall be able to adhere to health operating procedure and
awareness activity, adhere to safety emergency response plan
awareness activity and adhere to (ERP) followed
environment awareness activity. 1.6 Personal protective
equipments is worn
1.7 Safe machine operation is
The outcome of this CA is to abide followed
to Health, Safety and Environmental
rules and regulations. Hence 2. Adhere to safety awareness 2.1 Safety awareness
reducing exposure to hazards and activity procedure is followed
risks as well as incidence of work- 2.2 Signage related to safety is
related injury and illness. understood
2.3 Types of potential hazards
at workplace are identified
2.4 Occupational Safety and
Health Act Regulations is
followed.
2.5 Appropriate personal
protective equipment is
worn
2.6 Hygiene and emergency
facilities are used
2.7 Safe machine operation is
followed
2.8 Signage and definition is
identified
5
CA Title CA Code CA Descriptor Ability Performance Indicator
3. Adhere to environmental 3.1 Environmental awareness
awareness activity concept is understood.
3.2 Signage related to the
environmental awareness is
understood.
3.3 Environmental Act and
Regulations is followed.
6
CURRICULUM of CORE ABILITIES (CoCA)
The person who is competent in this CA shall be able to communicate effectively using appropriate language and formats as well as
understand organisational practices and intercultural communication.
Upon completion of this competency unit trainees will be able to:
LEARNING OUTCOME
• Apply working language appropriately (English / national language etc).
• Apply oral communication and speak reasonably.
• Understand reading materials.
ABILITY UNIT ID Z-009-1:2015-CA01 Level 1 Training Duration 10 Credit Hours 1.0
7
Training Hours Delivery
Ability Knowledge Performance Assessment Criteria
Mode
2. Apply oral 2.1 Types of oral 2.1 Identify the purpose of oral Knowledge Knowledge 2.1 Purpose of oral
communicati communication. communication. 3 • Lecture communication is defined.
on and 2.2 Appropriate language and 2.2 Use appropriate language • Group discussion 2.2 Appropriate language and
speak formats. and formats for oral format is explained.
reasonably. 2.3 Basic communication communication. 2.3 Appropriate language and
methods. 2.3 Apply basic communication format to communicate
2.4 Sign language and methods. clearly is used.
gestures. 2.4 Demonstrate body 2.4 Sign language and gesture is
2.5 Ideas and information language sign and demonstrated.
delivery. gestures. 2.5 Ideas and information are
2.6 Cultural awareness 2.5 Express ideas and expressed clearly.
information clearly. 2.6 Good speaking and listening
2.6 Speak clearly and listen skill is applied.
properly. 2.7 Multicultural sensitivities are
2.7 Recognise intercultural recognised.
sensitivities.
3. Understand 3.1 Purpose of reading. 3.1 Identify the purpose of Knowledge Knowledge 3.1 The purpose of reading is
reading 3.2 Types of reading material: reading. 3 • Lecture identified.
materials • Standard Operating 3.2 Choose types of reading • Group discussion 3.2 The correct reading contents
Procedure contents. are selected.
• Working manual 3.3 Understand content of 3.3 The content of relevant
• Work instruction relevant reading materials. materials is understood.
• Job procedure 3.4 Determine information from 3.4 Information from reading
• Text book reading materials. materials is determined.
• Dictionary
• Journals
• Memos
• Brochures
• Newsletters
3.3 Content of reading
materials.
8
TOOL, EQUIPMENT AND MATERIAL (TEM)
9
REFERENCES
1. Ting Toomey, S.; Chung, L.C., (2012). “Understanding intercultural communication”, Oxford University Press New York, ISBN-
9780199739790.
2. Gopalaswamy R.; Mahadevan R., (2010). “The Ace of Soft Skills, Attitude, Communication and Etiquette for Success”, Dorling Kindersley
Pvt. Ltd. ISBN: 978-81-317-3285-4.
3. Matthew M.K.; Martha D.; Fanning P., (2009). “Messages: The Communication Skills Book”, New Harbinger Publications.
ISBN-13 978-1572245921.
4. Perkins P. S.; Brown L., (2008). “The Art and Science of Communication: Tools for Effective Communication in the Workplace”, Wiley,
ISBN-13 978-0470247594.
5. Harris, T. E.; Nelson, M.D., (2008). “Applied organisational communication: Theory and practice in a global environment”, New York:
Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Baden E., (2007). “Communication in the workplace”, Milton, Qld:Wiley. ISBN 0-7314-0650-8.
7. Gerson S. J.; Steven M., (2007). “Workplace communication: process and product”. Upper Sadle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall.
ISBN 0-13-228808-7.
8. Gillis, T. L., (2006). The IABC handbook of organizational communication. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
9. Grunig, J.; Grunig, L., (2006). “Characteristics of excellent communication”, In T. L. Gillis (Ed.), the IABC handbook of organizational
communication (pp. 3-18). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Gay, C.; Mahoney, M.; Graves, J., (2005). “Best practices in employee communication: A study of global challenges and approaches”,
San Francisco, IABC Research Foundation.
11. Jones, E.; Watson, B.; Gardner, J.; Gallois, C., (2004). “Organizational communication: Challenges for the new century”. Journal of
Communication, 54(4), 722-750.
12. Douglas E., (1998). “Straight Talk: Turning Communications Upside Down for Strategic Results at Work”, Davies Black Publishing,
ISBN-13 978-0891061175.
10
CURRICULUM of CORE ABILITIES (CoCA)
11
Training Hours Delivery
Ability Knowledge Performance Assessment Criteria
Mode
2.1 Self discipline guideline. 2.1 Demonstrate work task and Knowledge Knowledge 2.1 Self discipline guideline is
2. Adopt work
punctuality
2.2 Work task and responsibility. 4 • Lecture defined.
responsibility. 2.2 Adhere to attendance at • Group discussion 2.2 Work task and responsibility
2.3 Staff attendance guideline. work. is listed.
2.4 Job delivery punctuality. 2.3 Register staff attendance 2.3 Staff attendance register
system. system is followed.
2.4 Follow good timekeeping 2.4 Good timekeeping procedure
procedure. is followed.
2.5 Accomplish work task within 2.5 Work task within timeframe is
an allotted timeframe. accomplished.
2.6
3. Demonstrate 3.1 Types of roles in team 3.1 Identify different roles within Knowledge Knowledge 3.1 Concept of teamwork is
team 3.2 Information sharing. a team. 7 • Lecture explained.
cooperation 3.3 Concept of teamwork. 3.2 Share relevant information • Group discussion 3.2 Socio-cultural communication
3.4 Basic problem solving steps with team members. is defined.
and process. 3.3 Listen and respond 3.3 Different roles within a team
3.5 Socio-cultural constructively to other team are identified.
communication. members' ideas. 3.4 Related information is
3.4 Apply basic problem solving shared.
process. 3.5 Basic problem solving
process is applied.
12
TOOL, EQUIPMENT AND MATERIAL (TEM)
REFERENCES
1. Stephen R. C.,(2013). “The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People: Powerful Lessons in Personal Change”.Simon & Schuster,ISBN-13: 978-
1451639612.
2. Watson D.; Tharp R., (2013). “Self-Directed Behaviour: Self-Modification for Personal Adjustment” Wadsworth Cengage Learning, John
David Hague, ISBN13:978-1-285-07709-3.
3. Kelloway E. K.; Turner N.; Barling J.; Loughlin C., (2012). “Transformational leadership and employee psychological well-being: The
mediating role of employee trust in leadership”, Work & Stress: An International Journal of Work, Health & Organisations Volume 26,
Issue 1.
4. Ekman P., PhD. (2008). “Emotional Awareness”. Danial Goleman. ISBN-13: 978-0-8050-9021-5.
5. McKay M.; Wood J. C.; Bantley J., (2007). “The Dialectical Behaviour Therapy Skills Workbook”, New Harbinger Publications. ISBN-13
978-1572245136.
6. Ekman P., (2003). “Unmasking the Face: A Guide to Recognizing Emotions from Facial Expressions”. Malor Books. ISBN-10:
1883536367.
7. Khalsa S.S., (1996). “Group Exercises for Enhancing Social Skills and Self Esteem”, Professional Resource Exchange, ISBN-
13 978-1568870205.
13
CURRICULUM of CORE ABILITIES (CoCA)
The person who is competent in this CA shall be able to follow the chain of command and portray good work place ethics behaviour in
the working environment.
LEARNING OUTCOME Upon completion of this competency unit trainees will be able to:
• Respond to instructions
• Demonstrate discipline at workplace
ABILITY UNIT ID Z-009-1:2015-CA03 Level 1 Training Duration 15 Credit Hours 1.5
14
Training Hours Delivery
Ability Knowledge Performance Assessment Criteria
Mode
2. Demonstrate 2.1 Discipline guideline. 2.1 Demonstrate good self- Knowledge Knowledge 2.1 General principles for the
discipline at 2.2 Principle of confidentiality. discipline. 2 • Lecture handling of confidential
workplace 2.3 Standard and codes of 2.2 Apply standard and codes Group discussion information are defined.
practice. of practice. 2.2 Standard and codes of
2.4 Working guideline. 2.3 Adhere to working practices are applied.
2.5 Social interactions guideline. 2.3 Good self-discipline is
procedures. 2.4 Adhere to disciplinary action demonstrated.
2.6 Disciplinary action guideline. guideline 2.4 Working guidelines is
adhered.
2.5 Disciplinary action guideline
is adhered
15
TOOL, EQUIPMENT AND MATERIAL (TEM)
16
REFERENCES
1. Bredeson D.; Goree K., (2011). “Ethics in the Workplace”, Cengage Learning. ISBN-13 978-0538497770.
2. Beckett C.; Maynard A., (2012). “Values and ethics in social work”, Sage Publications Ltd. ISBN-978-1-4462-0319-4.
3. Kotter J.;Rathgeber H., (2006). “Our Iceberg Is Melting: Changing and Succeeding Under Any Conditions”, St. Martin's Press.
4. Baker T. L.; Hunt T. G.; Andrews C. M., (2006). “Promoting ethical behavior and organizational citizenship behaviors: The influence of
corporate ethical values”, Journal of Business Research, Volume 59, Issue 7, pages 849–857.
5. Stephen B., (2004). "Workplace participatory practices: Conceptualising workplaces as learning environments", Journal of Workplace
Learning, Vol. 16 Issue: 6, pages 312 – 324.
6. Garavan T. N., (2002). “Competencies and workplace learning: some reflections on the rhetoric and the reality”, Journal of Workplace
Learning, ISSN: 1366-5626.
7. Joyner B.E.; Payne D., (2002). “Evolution and Implementation: A Study of Values, Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility
Journal of Business Ethics” Volume 41, Issue 4, pp 297-311.
8. Chadsey J.; Beyer S., (2001). “Social relationships in the workplace”, Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research
Reviews, Volume 7, Issue 2, page 128.
9. Heath C.; Knoblauch H.; Luff P., (2000). “Technology and social interaction: the emergence of ‘workplace studies’”. The British Journal of
Sociology, Volume 51, Issue 2, pages 299-320.
10. Carnegie D., (1998). “How to Win Friends & Influence People”. Pocket Books. ISBN: 0-671-02703-4.
17
CURRICULUM of CORE ABILITIES (CoCA)
The person who is competent in this CA shall be able to abide to Health, Safety and Environmental rules and regulations. Hence reducing
exposure to hazards and risks as well as incidence of work-related injury and illness.
LEARNING OUTCOME Upon completion of this competency unit trainees will be able to:
• Adhere to health awareness activity.
• Adhere to safety awareness activity.
• Adhere to environmental awareness activity.
ABILITY UNIT ID Z-009-1:2015-CA04 Level 1 Training Duration 11 Credit Hours 1.1
Training Delivery
Ability Related Knowledge Performance Assessment Criteria
Hours Mode
1. Adhere to health 1.1 Health awareness concept 1.1 Determine health Knowledge Knowledge 1.1 Health awareness concept is
awareness activity • Important of OSH implementation awareness concept. 4.5 • Lecture understood
1.2 OSH legislation 1.2 Understand OSH legislation • Group 1.2 Health Act and Regulations are
• Salient provision of Occupational 1.3 Identify signage and discussion followed
Safety and Health Act 1994 definition 1.3 Signage and definition is
• Occupational Safety and Health 1.4 Familiarize type of hazards understood
Act 1994 • Physical, chemical, 1.4 Type of hazardsare identified
- Dutiesof employees psychososial, biological, 1.5 Work instruction, safe operating
18
Training Delivery
Ability Related Knowledge Performance Assessment Criteria
Hours Mode
• Factories and Machinery Act ergonomic procedure and emergency
1967 1.5 Familiarize work instruction, response plan (ERP) is followed
- Safety health and welfare safe operating procedure 1.6 Personal protective equipments is
1.3 Signage and definition and emergency response worn
1.4 Type of hazards plan (ERP) 1.7 Safe machine operation is
• Physical (falls, trips, slips, working 1.6 Wear appropriate PPE followed
at height, confined space, etc.) correctly
• Chemical (flammable toxic, 1.7 Familiarize safe machine
corrosive, oxidizing, etc.) operation
• Psychososial (stress,
harrasement, etc.)
• Biological (microbiological, animal
tissue and fluid, etc.)
• Ergonomic (MSD, repeatitive
movement, etc.)
1.5 Work instruction, safe operating
procedure and emergency
response plan (ERP – fire safety,
etc.)
1.6 General personal protective
equipments
1.7 Safe machine operation (related
industries)
2.1 Safety awareness concept. 2.1 Adhere to safety awareness Knowledge Knowledge 2.1 Safety awareness concept is
2. Adhere to safety • Important of OSH implementation procedure 4.0 • Lecture understood.
awareness activity 2.2 OSH legislation 2.2 Recognise types of potential • Group 2.2 The usage of emergency facilities
• Salient provision of Occupational hazards in workplace, discussion is understood.
Safety and Health Act 1994 and adhere to Occupational 2.3 Signage and definition is
Regulation Safety and Health Act and understood.
19
Training Delivery
Ability Related Knowledge Performance Assessment Criteria
Hours Mode
- Dutiesof employees Regulations, understand 2.4 Safety awareness procedure is
• Factories and Machinery Act 1967 OSH legislation adhered.
and Regulation 2.3 Recognise types of potential 2.5 Types of potential hazards in
- Safety health and welfare hazards in workplace, workplace are recognised.
2.3 Type of hazards familiarize hazards 2.6 Appropriate personal protective
• Physical (falls, trips, slips, working • Physical, chemical, equipment is worn.
at height, confined space, etc.) psychososial, biological, 2.7 Hygienic facilities are used.
• Chemical (flammable toxic, ergonomic 2.8 The usage of emergency facilities
corrosive, oxidizing, etc.) 2.4 Wear appropriate PPE is demonstrated.
correctly 2.9 Work-related injuries or illness is
• Psychososial (stress, reported.
2.5 Identify signage and
harrasement, etc.)
definition 2.10 Occupational Safety and Health
• Biological (microbiological, animal 2.6 Use hygiene facilities Act and Regulations are adhered.
tissue and fluid, etc.) properly 2.11 Safe machine operation is
• Ergonomic (MSD, repeatitive 2.7 Demonstrate the usage of followed
movement, etc.) emergency facilities, report 2.12 Signage and definition is
2.4 General personal protective any workplace injuries or understood
equipments (PPE) illness to superiors
• Hat 2.8 Familiarize work instruction,
• Googles safe operating procedure
• Safety glasses and emergency response
• Gloves plan (ERP)
• Masks 2.9 Familiarize safe machine
operation
• Safety shoes
• Hearing protection
2.5 Signage and definition
2.6 Hygiene facilities
• Hand wash stations and
disinfectant soaps
20
Training Delivery
Ability Related Knowledge Performance Assessment Criteria
Hours Mode
2.7 Emergency facilities
• First aid kits
• Eye wash station
2.8 Work instruction, safe operating
procedure and emergency
response plan (ERP - fire safety,
etc.)
2.9 Safe machine operation (related
industries)
3. Adhere to 3.1 Environmental awareness concept. 3.1 Understand environmental Knowledge Knowledge 3.1 Environmental awareness
environmental 3.2 Environmental Act and awareness concept. 2.5 • Lecture concept is understood.
awareness activity Regulations. 3.2 Follow Environmental Act • Group 3.2 Environmental Act and
3.3 Signage and definition. and Regulations. discussion Regulations are followed.
3.3 Identify signage and 3.3 Signage and definition is
definition. identified.
21
TOOL, EQUIPMENT AND MATERIAL (TEM)
REFERENCES
1. Occupational Safety and Health Act 1994 and Regulation, (2009) Malaysia, Penerbitan Akta (M), ISBN-967701188-X.
2. Chessebro T.; O’Connor L.; Rios F., (2009), Communicating in the Workplace. Prentice Hall. ISBN-13 978-0136136910.
3. Vergo P., (1974). Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974, (Public General Acts – Elizabeth II), TSO. ISBN-13 978-0105437741
4. Health and Safety Executive, (1998), Workplace Health, Safety and Welfare: Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992- Approved Code of Practice
and Guidance (Health and Safety Commission). HSE Books. ISBN-13 978-0717604135.
5. HSE, (2014). Health and Safety Guidance. HSE Book. ISBN 9780717665877.
22
6. Sneddon A.; Mearns K.; Flin R., (2013). “Stress, fatigue, situation awareness and safety in offshore drilling crews”, Safety Science, Volume 56, pages 80–88.
7. Goetsch D. L., (2013). “Construction Safety & Health, 2nd Edition”, Pearson, ISBN: 10: 0132374692.
8. Kim O.S.; Oh S.I., (2010). “Assessment of Accidents Occurrence and Cuisine Employees' Awareness of Workplace Safety in Contract Foodservice Management
Company”, J. Korean Diet Assoc. Volume 16(4), pages 299-317.
9. Whysall Z.; Haslam C.; Haslam R., (2006). “Implementing health and safety interventions in the workplace: An exploratory study”, International Journal of Industrial
Ergonomics, Volume 36, Issue 9, pages 809–818.
10. Chena J. R.; Yang Y. T., (2004). “A predictive risk index for safety performance in process industries”, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Volume
17, pages 233–242.
11. Angelica M.; Vecchio-Sadusa; Griffiths S., (2004). “Marketing strategies for enhancing safety culture”, Safety Science, Volume 42, Issue 7, pages 601–619.
12. Parker S. K.; Axtell C. M.; Nick T., (2001). “Designing a safer workplace: Importance of job autonomy, communication quality, and supportive supervisors”, Journal of
Occupational Health Psychology, Volume 6(3), pages 211-228.
13. Bob E.; Hayes B. E.; Perander J.; Smecko T.; Trask J., (1998). “Measuring Perceptions of Workplace Safety: Development and Validation of the Work Safety Scale”,
Journal of Safety Research, Volume 29, Issue 3, pages 145–161.
14. Factories and Machinery Act 1967 and Regulations, Pindaan Ogos 2008, ISBN 967701156-1
15. Garis Panduan bagi Pengenalpastian Hazard, Penaksiran Risiko dan Kawalan Risiko (HIRARC), ISBN 978-983-2014-62-1
23
TRAINING HOUR SUMMARY
RELATED TRAINING
ABILITY UNIT ID. ABILITY UNIT TITLE ABILITY
KNOWLEDGE (HOURS)
TOTAL (HOURS) 40
24