Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

Advanced Expository/Descriptive Writing Rubric

Exemplary (4) Accomplished (3) Developing (2) Limited (1)


Essay shows evidence Essay shows evidence Essay shows Essay shows
of strong skills of of application of skills of inconsistent application inconsistent application
analysis, synthesis, and analysis, synthesis, and of skills of analysis, of skills of analysis,
Critical Thinking
evaluation. Logic is evaluation. Logic is synthesis, and synthesis, and
virtually flawless. nearly flawless. evaluation. Logic may evaluation. Logic may
be flawed. be flawed.
Essay reflects mastery Essay reflects a solid Essay reflects a some Essay reflects little
of the literary understanding of the understanding of the understanding of the
perspective applied. The literary perspective literary perspective literary perspective
writer is fluent in the applied. The writer is applied. The writer applied. The writer
language and theory using much of the struggles to use the barely uses the
Application of Critical
behind the perspective. language and theory language and theory language and theory
Technique &
Analysis and behind the perspective. behind the perspective. behind the perspective.
Perspective
conclusions drawn are Analysis and Analysis and Analysis and
virtually incontrovertible. conclusions drawn are conclusions drawn are conclusions drawn are
strong with minor somewhat questionable questionable with
"errors." with a few obvious obvious "errors."
"errors."
Essay remains focused Essay remains focused Essay remains focused Essay may lose focus
on a clear thesis with on a clear thesis with on a thesis with most on or lack a clear thesis;
Essay Focus
every support powerfully every support clearly supports adequately some supports are not
connected to the thesis. connected to the thesis. connected to the thesis. connected to the thesis.
Powerfully chosen Well chosen textual Acceptably chosen Questionably chosen
textual proof supports proof supports each textual proof supports textual proof supports a
each point. The textual point. The textual proof most points. The textual few points. The textual
Quality of Support
proof is thoroughly is adequately examined, proof may be proof is likely
examined, explained, explained, and relevant inconsistently examined, insufficiently examined,
and clearly relevant to to the thesis. explained, and relevant explained, or relevant to
the thesis. to the thesis. the thesis.
Essay is strikingly Essay is well organized Essay is competently Essay is inconsistently
organized with a keen with a logical approach organized with a logical organized with a
Essay Organization & sensitivity to building an to building an argument. if uninspired approach to haphazard approach to
Transitions argument. Transitions Transitions are solid and building an argument. building an argument.
are sophisticated and varied. Transitions are ordinary Transitions are choppy
varied. but sufficient. or lacking.
Illustrative examples from Examples from the Examples from the No illustrative examples
the writer’s experience or writer’s experience or writer’s experience show are included
plans are detailed, plans are only one of
pertinent, and memorable detailed and  detail
Illustrative Examples pertinent,  clear
but not relevance,
memorable  vividness or
memorability

Paragraphs flow well Paragraphs flow well Paragraphs are choppy Paragraphs are choppy
Internal Paragraph internally with each internally with each internally with internally with confusing
Coherence sentence building and sentence building into sometimes confusing jumps and between
flowing into the next. the next. jumps between ideas. ideas.
Essay is flawlessly Essay is well written Essay is acceptably Essay is poorly written
written with a flair for with a solid academic written with a some with a little academic
Mechanics and Style academic style. style. Some strong word academic style. Word style. Word choice and
Excellent word choice choice and sentence choice and sentence sentence variety are
and sentence variety. variety. variety are ordinary. below expectations.

Work Reviewed: Ms. Mhanel_______________________________________ Date Submitted: 09/29/17_____________


Reviewer: Jesyl Origen R. Yague _________________________________ Total Score: 21___________________