Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
& 2003 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0954-3007/03 $25.00
www.nature.com/ejcn
ORIGINAL COMMUNICATION
A practical approach to increasing intakes of n-3
polyunsaturated fatty acids: use of novel foods
enriched with n-3 fats
RG Metcalf1*, MJ James1, E Mantzioris1 and LG Cleland1
1
Department of Rheumatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
Objectives: To assess the effects of providing a wide range of foodstuffs containing n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA),
occurring naturally or from fortification, on intake and blood and tissue proportions of n-3 PUFA.
Design: Before/after dietary intervention study.
Setting: Adelaide, Australia.
Subjects: 16 healthy males recruited from the community.
Interventions: Subjects were provided with a range of foodstuffs naturally containing n-3 PUFA (fresh fish, canned fish, flaxseed
meal, canola oil) and items fortified with fish oil (margarine spread, milk, sausages, luncheon meat, french onion dip). Food
choices were left to the discretion of each subject. Intake was estimated by diet diary. Blood was collected atF2, 0, 2, and 4
weeks for fatty acid analysis.
Main outcome measures: Dietary intakes; plasma, platelet, and mononuclear cell phospholipid fatty acids.
Results: Consumption of n-3 PUFA increased significantly: a-linolenic acid (ALA) from 1.4 to 4.1 g/day (Po0.001),
eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) from 0.03 to 0.51 g/day (Po0.001), and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) from 0.09 to 1.01 g/day
(Po0.001). Linoleic acid (LA) intake decreased from 13.1 to 9.2 g/day (Po0.001). The proportions of EPA and DHA increased
significantly in all phospholipid pools examined; plasma EPA from 1.13% of total fatty acids to 3.38% (Po0.001) and DHA from
3.76 to 7.23% (Po0.001); mononuclear cell EPA from 0.40 to 1.25% (Po0.001) and DHA from 2.33 to 4.08% (Po0.001);
platelet EPA from 0.41 to 1.2% (Po0.001) and DHA from 1.64 to 3.07% (Po0.001).
Conclusion: Incorporating fish oil into a range of novel commercial foods provides the opportunity for wider public
consumption of n-3 PUFA with their associated health benefits.
Sponsorship: Dawes Scholarship, Royal Adelaide Hospital.
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2003) 57, 1605–1612. doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601731
Table 2 The estimated daily macronutrient intake during the baseline and dietary intervention periods
Dietary intervention
Energy
MJ/day 10.071.6 (8.3–13.1)* 10.271.8 (7.7–13.5) 10.572.1 (8.0–14.7)
kcal/day 23897383 (1981–3127) 24487425 (1845–3225) 25087507 (1913–3507)
Protein
g/day 102718a (79–144) 116719b (83–157) 121717b (92–164)
% of energy 17.572.3a (14.6–22.6) 19.472.4b (15.0–23.5) 19.972.2b (15.7–24.8)
Fat
g/day 91720 (61–118) 95720 (60–129) 98729 (53–151)
% of energy 33.775.5 (26.3–44.9) 34.174.1 (27.0–39.9) 34.175.6 (24.5–42.7)
Carbohydrate
g/day 283767 (199–425) 280769 (171–417) 281767 (200–406)
% of energy 45.276.6 (34.5–54.2) 43.576.0 (34.6–53.4) 42.975.8 (33.3–52.0)
Alcohol
g/day 12.1713.4 (0–40) 10.2712.4 (0–39) 11.1712.3 (0–43.3)
% of energy 3.574.0 (0–12.7) 3.073.9 (0–11.8) 3.173.8 (0–15.1)
Dietary intervention
18:1 n-9
g/day 29.676.9a (18.3–37.9)* 35.877.5b (23.6–55.2) 35.5710.4b (18.5–55.4)
% of energy 10.872.4a (7.6–14.7) 12.972.2b (9.1–17.4) 12.472.6b (8.1–18.0)
18:2 n-6
g/day 13.175.4a (6.7–28.8) 9.372.1b (5.8–14.1) 9.072.8b (4.7–17.0)
% of energy 4.872.1a (2.7–11.3) 3.370.5b (2.7–4.3) 3.170.6b (2.1–4.4)
18:3 n-3
g/day 1.470.6a (0.5–2.6) 4.271.8b (2.1–8.6) 4.072.3b (0.9–10.2)
% of energy 0.5170.24a (0.22–1.05) 1.5070.60b (0.84–3.22) 1.370.7b (0.4–3.4)
20:5 n-3
g/day 0.0370.03a (0.00–0.08) 0.5270.19b (0.21–0.86) 0.5070.25b (0.11–1.07)
% of energy 0.0170.01a (0.00–0.03) 0.1970.07b (0.06–0.32) 0.1770.07b (0.04–0.35)
22:6 n-3
g/day 0.0970.07a (0.00–0.23) 1.0170.38b (0.41–1.88) 1.0170.42b (0.27–1.79)
% of energy 0.0470.03a (0.00–0.10) 0.3370.14b (0.12–0.68) 0.3570.13b (0.10–0.54)
Total n-3
g/day 1.570.8a (0.7–2.8) 5.972.1b (3.3–11.2) 5.772.9b (2.1–12.6)
% of energy 0.5670.26a (0.28–1.19) 2.170.7b (1.3–4.2) 1.970.8b (0.9–4.1)
Table 4 Subject consumption of the foods provided, and estimates of the contribution of those foods to the overall intake of n-3 PUFAs
*x7s.d.
w
The mean quantity and percentage of the n-3 PUFA contributed by the food in only those subjects consuming that particular food.
*x7s.d.
w
Values represent % of total fatty acids.
Values within a row with different superscript letters indicate significant differences at P=0.05 (repeated measures ANOVA, post hoc analysis by Newman–Keuls
multiple comparisons method).
*x7s.d.
w
Values represent % of total fatty acids.
Values within a row with different superscript letters indicate significant differences at P=0.05 (repeated measures ANOVA, post hoc analysis by Newman–Keuls
multiple comparisons method).
z
Not detected.
*x7s.d.
z
Values represent % of total fatty acids.
Values within a row with different superscript letters indicate significant differences at p=0.05 (repeated measures ANOVA, post hoc analysis by Newman–Keuls
multiple comparisons method).
Lovegrove et al (1997) fortified some everyday items intakes of EPA þ DHA of 1.4 and 1.8 g, respectively.
with fish oil such as bread and spread, along with a However, in both studies, the investigators gave no
number of sweet foods, including biscuits, cake, ice indication of the popularity of each food item, or the
cream, and milkshake powder, and used a portion exchange contribution of each food item to the total LC n-3
system with the aim of achieving a daily intake of 1.8 g PUFA intake.
EPA þ DHA. Likewise, Mantzioris et al (2000) used a In the present study, we have used similar foods to those
similar dietary approach with fish-oil-fortified savoury used by Mantzioris et al (2000) with the addition of fish-oil-
products like sausages and dip, and had a large fortified margarine spread and long-life milk. This is the first
emphasis on ingestion of fresh fish, and set a target study to examine the food preferences of the subjects, and
EPA content in mononuclear cell phospholipids of the contribution of the individual food items to the overall
1.5% of total fatty acids. Subjects achieved mean daily intakes of EPA and DHA.