Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Revision: 9
Date: 2013-12-04
Contact:
GL Renewables Certification
Germanischer Lloyd Industrial Services GmbH
Phone: +49 40 36149-0
Fax: +49 40 36149-1720
E-Mail: renewablescertification.energy@dnvgl.com
Brooktorkai 18
20457 Hamburg
Germany
www.dnvgl.com/energy
This Technical Note was compiled by GL Renewables Certification in cooperation with the
Wind and Marine Energy Committee. The Wind and Marine Energy Committee consists of representatives from
public authorities, wind turbine and component manufacturers, engineering consultants, institutes, universities,
technical associations and insurance companies.
The current members of the Wind and Marine Energy Committee are named on our website:
www.dnvgl.com/energy
Interpretation of the Technical Note is the exclusive prerogative of GL Renewables Certification. Any reference to
the application of this Technical Note is permitted only with the consent
of GL Renewables Certification.
GL Renewables Certification
Reproduction by printing or photo static means, even of extracts, is only permissible with the consent
of GL Renewables Certification.
Table of Contents
1 Introduction 5
1.1 Objectives 5
1.2 Definitions and symbols 6
1.3 GCC parameters (Grid Code requirement definitions according to Appendix) 7
1.4 Site specific requirements (Grid Code or set of parameters according to section 1.3) 7
6 References 29
1.1 Objectives
This document makes it possible to proof, that certain requirements from electrical system operators are fulfilled.
It shows how to proof compliance with requirements set by other documents (e. g. set by grid codes). This
document also helps to find an envelope for differing requirements.
Equipment used for the generation of electrical current using renewable energy sources like wind, solar radiation
bio fuels etc. have to be compliant with grid code requirements set by system operators governments or others.
This technical note helps proving such compliance. The scope is described in section 2.3.1 in more detail. Such
equipment can be structured in generation units and generation plants, as most of the equipment is of a
distributed generation type.
Generation units are defined as single current generating installations like single wind turbines, single inverters
with connected photovoltaic (PV) modules etc.
Modern renewable generating plants are designed to support the electrical grid during normal operation as well
as during electrical faults in the system. This is achieved by extra features of renewable generating units in order
to help system operators keeping distribution and transmission systems in safe operational mode.
A generation plant is the aggregation of several generation units, connected to a common connection point,
including corresponding power cables, power transformers, reactive power compensation installations as well as
protection and control systems as far as applicable. Examples are wind farms and PV farms.
In some countries, system operators require to establish evidence that renewable generating units are compatible
with the requirements of their grid codes in order to be connected to the grid. In most countries only generating
plants can be compliant with grid codes, not generating units. This is due to the focus of system operators on
power plants with aggregated power and another reason is that power plant structure is usually not within the
responsibility of system operators but power plant operator’s responsibility. Nevertheless this technical note
shows a way, how types of renewable generating units can show Grid Code Compliance by defining assumptions
which have to be implemented on renewable generating plant level. Showing compliance with grid codes can be
done best by Grid Code Compliance certification.
During faults in the electrical system voltage drops or rises can occur at the output terminals of a renewable
generation unit. According to the grid codes of various system operators a renewable generation plant shall stay
operational during specific voltage drops (Low Voltage Ride Through, LVRT).
This technical note describes a procedure to prove compliance with grid codes of equipment, generation units
and generation plants as well as a corresponding field test of the behavior of a renewable generation unit during
defined voltage drops in the grid. The test shall in general be performed on a unit in operation and not on a test
stand. Exceptions are acceptable if the results are technical equally representative for the fault assumption under
examination. This has to be described and the description is to be provided to GL for assessment during the
certification.”
cos Power factor of the Active power of the fundamental positive sequence divided by
fundamental positive apparent power of the fundamental positive sequence as defined as
sequence cos 1+ in IEC 61400-21.
I [A] Phase current Root mean square value of the current in one phase.
P [W] Active power Real part of the apparent power, which is produced by the
renewable generation unit.
Q [VAr] Reactive power Imaginary part of the apparent power, which is produced by the
renewable generation unit.
U [V] Voltage Phase to phase voltage, root mean square value (RMS)
MP1 Measuring Point 1 Measuring point at the grid side of test equipment
MP2 Measuring Point 2 Measuring point at the medium voltage side of the unit transformer
(winding connected to the distribution system), close to the
transformer or to the medium voltage switchgear.
MP3 Measuring Point 3 Measuring point at the low voltage side of the unit transformer
PCC Point of Common PCC is the interface at which the renewable generation plant is
Coupling connected to a transmission, distribution or closed distribution
network.
PAvailable Available power output Maximum available active power output depending on e.g. the wind
speed at present. PAvailable shall be measured prior to the voltage
drop as 2 seconds average value. After the voltage dip PAvailable shall
be measured as 5 seconds average value.
U Minimum voltage drop The minimum phase-to-phase voltage (RMS line-to-line value) as
requirement required by the respective grid code during a voltage drop.
Dip Voltage dip The combination of a voltage drop and a voltage recovery just after
each other with a well-defined pause (dip duration). Definitions can
be found in section 5.3.2.2.2, Figure 5-1.
Recovery Voltage recovery The rise of the voltage from the residual voltage to the normal
operating range of grid voltage specified by the system operator
(e.g. ±10% Un).
Drop Voltage drop The quick reduction of voltage from a normal value to a remaining
voltage.
Uremaining Remaining voltages The voltage value at a given point after a voltage drop at this point
(e. g. U, U) has happened. The value shall be given as phase-to-phase voltage
(RMS line-to-line value calculated analogue to the method for
phase-to-neutral voltage as given in the IEC 61400-21, Annex C).
Umin…Umax Voltage tolerance band As required for PCC in grid codes, see Section 5.3.2.2.2, Figure 5-1
UHVRT High-Voltage Ride- The defined value of a voltage above Umax which can occur during
Through voltage temporary over voltages (TOV). This can be tested by a high-voltage
ride-through (HVRT).
GCC parameters as defined in the Appendix can be used as a single criterion for certification (e.g. D12J for
maximum voltage phase jump robustness during LVRT only) or as set of many GCC parameters to be used as a
set of criteria for certification (e.g. D12 + D13 + D14 for all LVRT requirements one could imagine to exist in any
grid code).
When applying these GCC parameters (short code numbering according to Appendix) as criteria for a
certification, the corresponding details like values have to be given either by the applicant for certification (e.g. by
using the maximum equipment performance values) or by the grid codes used as an evaluation criteria in
conjunction with this technical note (grid codes can be chosen e.g. by using the listing on internet http://www.gl-
group.com/pdf/IGCC_list.pdf ).
1.4 Site specific requirements (grid code or set of parameters according to section 1.3)
For each certification, the grid codes that are assessed are to be defined with the grid code identification name
and associated date of publication as minimum (according to Appendix G1). A list of applicable grid codes is
available online at www.gl-group.com/pdf/IGCC_list.pdf. Alternatively a set of GCC parameters according to
section 1.3 and Appendix can be applied for a site.
2.2 Assessment according to outdated technical notes for Grid Code Compliance (GCC)
For certifications of Grid Code Compliance (GCC) previously performed according to the GL Wind Technical
Notes TN065 [19] and TN066 [4] future assessments shall be performed according to this technical note, but the
scope has to be adapted accordingly. The technical notes [4] and [19] are replaced by this Technical Note for the
Certification of Grid Code Compliance (GCC).
Requirements shall be defined by the applicant in advance; the necessary assessment to be done by GL is
described in chapter 3 for generation units and in chapter 4 for assessment of generation plants. The procedure
of defining requirements is explained in the next section together with the different scopes, available for Grid
Code Compliance.
For this approach a set of GCC parameters with short codes according to section 1.3 and the Appendix shall be
applied for certification. In this approach the requirements can be selected by the applicant based on the
maximum possible capabilities of the equipment under certification. For that a completed table 2-1 shall be
provided by the customer (applicant) for certification together with the order. For all details see listing in the
Appendix. Please find a corresponding example as table 2-1 below.
Umax, H 32 kV
Umax, C 30 kV
Duration 1 h
Reduction 20 %
Table 2-1: Example of set of GCC parameters with short code # numbers to be provided for certification
International max capability approach is used to receive Certification Reports based on test results from
measurements made by accredited testing laboratories. Each test shall be specified by a test plan according to
section 5.3.2 (Test plan preparation). This is mostly done for generation units.
For Multi-National Grid Code Approach requirements in the grid codes are used as Grid Code Requirement, the
following table 2-2 shall be provided together with the application for certification and the corresponding order,
please find an example of table 2-2 below:
Revision/
No. Author Country Title Date Draft
007 No. according to http://www.gl-group.com/pdf/IGCC_list.pdf
093 No. according to http://www.gl-group.com/pdf/IGCC_list.pdf
112 No. according to http://www.gl-group.com/pdf/IGCC_list.pdf
Table 2-2 to be provided by the applicant together with the order, if grid codes shall form the basis of assessment
In the Multi-National Grid Code Approach compliance shall be based on grid codes. It can only be based on a set
of parameters according to section 1.3 if all requirements of the Grid Codes are given in the set of parameters.
This approach can be used to receive a Type Certificate (GCC) for one or more Grid Codes specified according
to Section 1.4 (Site Specific Requirements (Grid Codes)). This is mostly done for generation units.
For the Site Specific Approach the grid code requirements are fixed for the site, either by a Grid Code or by a set
of parameters similar to table 2-1 usually written in the contractual document valid for the site and the grid
connection or power purchase agreement.
The assessment in the Site Specific Approach can be based on deliverables from Max Capability Approach or
from Multi-National Grid Code Approach.
A single Project Certificate (GCC), a Statement of Compliance including or a Certification Report only can be
issued based on specified grid code(s) or set of parameters according to section 1.3 or 1.4 (Site Specific
Requirements (Grid Codes).
At the time of writing this document, this holds true for legal requirements in Germany and Spain, Greece and
Portugal, these countries require certification according to the following certification guidelines.
Concerning Non-exhaustive requirements the following holds ture: as far as national or local system operator
requirements are not explicitly specifying the limitation values of such non-exhaustive requirements (GCC-
parameters) they can be assumed according to section 1.3. All non-exhaustive requirements can be used as
detailed e.g. in the following document from ENTSO-E:
Implementation Guideline for Network Code “Requirements for Grid Connection Applicable to all Generators” [28].
For HVDC connection, the corresponding implementation guideline for the Network Code on HVDC Connections
shall be taken into account.
2.3.2.2 Greece
A Greek law requires grid code compliance; see Grid Code No. 076 in
http://www.gl-group.com/pdf/IGCC_list.pdf.
2.3.2.6 China
There are separate grid codes for wind and PV solar. The grid code published for wind integration [22] and for PV
power stations [23] can be found in chapter 6. In China, the various tests for grid connection and simulation model
based evaluation are required. The relevant work is based on the drafted guidelines [24], [25] and [26].
2.3.3 Deliverables
Certification of a generation unit or a generation plant concerning Grid Code Compliance (GCC) is subdivided into
the steps listed below.
Statement of Compliance
Grid Code Requirements
Type Certificate (GCC)
Generation Unit
(e.g. Wind Turbine)
Project Certificate (GCC)
Generation Plant
(e.g. Wind Farm)
Fig. 2-2: Deliverables and subdivision of the certification process. Dashed lines mean optional deliverables.
2.3.3.1 Certification Reports
In the Certification Reports the generation unit respectively the generation plant is described. Furthermore, the
tests, which have been performed and their parameters are listed as well as the validated software model (GCC)
details.
Certification Reports can be issued for parts of the full scope of assessment by defining elements of certification
depending on the requirements. Scope and structure of the Certification Report is depending on the Grid Codes
applied or on the scope defined for the Max Capability Approach or Site Specific Approach. Such definition of the
scope and elements shall be defined within each certification process. The scope will be given in the Certification
Report, based on definitions according to section 1.3 and the scope according to section 2.3.1.
A single Certification Report can be issued dealing with several subjects and scopes of assessment. The
corresponding scope will be given in the Certification Report itself.
To achieve a Type Certificate (GCC) according to this technical note a reference to one or more specific grid
codes as mentioned in section 1.4 is necessary. Besides the grid codes mentioned in section 1.4 other
acknowledged standards and guidelines can be applied after agreement with GL.
A Type Certificate (GCC) for a power generation unit can be issued with reference to one or more grid codes if all
requirements of these grid codes have been assessed according to chapter 3 of this technical note and if the
results comply with the requirements of the specific grid codes. On the Type Certificate (GCC) it is mentioned if
full-scale on-site tests according to chapter 5 have been performed.
After successful completion of all evaluations according to chapter 3 and in case of compliance with the
requirements of specific grid codes or set of parameters (according to section 1.3) and / or other acknowledged
standards and guidelines a Type Certificate (GCC) will be issued. The test and certification procedures, which
have been used in each case, as well as the grid codes and / or other acknowledged standards and guidelines,
are mentioned in the appendix to the Type Certificate (GCC). In no case shall the scope of assessment according
to chapter 3 exceed the requirements of the corresponding grid codes or set of parameters (according to section
1.3) and / or other acknowledged standards and guidelines.
Evaluations according to chapter 3 shall be performed in any case, validation according to section 3.7 is
recommended.
To attain a Project Certificate (GCC), all generation units installed shall have a valid Type Certificate (GCC) or a
corresponding independent verification confirmed by Certification Reports according to section 2.3.3.1. On
agreement with GL comparable documents from other accredited certification bodies can by recognised.
For a Project Certificate (GCC) compliance of the generation plant with the applicable grid code and / or locally
valid set of requirements of parameters according to section 1.3 shall be assessed for the specific site given (see
section 2.3.1.3). Dynamic and static simulations shall prove compliance of all items given in chapter 5 as far as
required by the corresponding grid code and / or locally valid set of requirements of parameters according to
section 1.3.
- generator
- main frequency converter
- rotor blade pitch drive (including motor, converter and control if electrically powered, or hydraulic
pump and valve control system if hydraulic powered)
- yaw drive
For renewable generating units other than wind turbines, documents shall be provided for only the applicable
components of the mentioned above. Documents may include, but shall not be limited to, a set of rating plate
data, environmental temperature assumptions and corresponding calculations.
- reactive power control mode (see Appendix D10). Optionally, also the following control modes can
be assessed:
- power factor control mode (see Appendix D9)
- voltage control mode (see Appendix D11)
As far as such requirements are defined in the Grid Code or agreed for the certification, the following
requirements shall be assessed during software model assessment:
After successful validation and plausibility tests by GL, the software model is called validated software model
(GCC).
The validated software model (GCC) shall be used for simulations on renewable generation plant level for Project
Certification (GCC) (see chapter 4).
In cases a Grid Code does not require validated software model (GCC), it is not mandatory to provide a software
model for validation and assessment. Nevertheless it is recommended to use a validated software model (GCC)
for further Grid Code Compliance certification, because simulation results could be used instead of testing.
3.9 Safety system for structural integrity of special generation units e.g. of wind turbines
The structural integrity assessment is outside of the scope of this technical note. However, to evaluate the safe
operation of the renewable generation unit even during grid failure, the evaluation of the relevant ranges of safety
system, protection and monitoring devices as well as the relevant ranges of the load assumptions of the
renewable generation unit have to be assessed within the scope of a corresponding structural integrity
assessment. This applies e.g. if rotating parts are involved in the generation unit and issues like over speed
impose a risk to the units structural integrity, e.g. in the case of wind turbines. The evaluation is part of the design
evaluation according to the respective standards and guidelines (e.g. GL IV-1 [15], GL IV-2 [17], IEC 61400-22
[14] or DNV DSS 904 [27]). This design assessment shall consider load cases expected during voltage dip testing
for Grid Code compliance of the renewable generation unit.
Also other influences on load assessment than LVRT shall be regarded within the corresponding structural
integrity design but is outside of the scope of this technical note.
The following measured values shall be assessed if required according to section 1.4:
The following set point values shall be assessed if required according to section 1.4:
Further assessments may be necessary, if required by the Grid Code or the requirements of the grid operator.
The communication interface to the renewable generation units and the set point control has to be defined clearly
by the renewable generation plant operator. For the assessment also section 4.4 shall be considered.
Simulations of phase-to-earth-faults according to section 5.3.2.4 shall be applied on renewable generation plant
level. For this, corresponding impedances shall be provided by the responsible local system operator. In case a
Grid Code does not require phase-to-earth fault verification such simulations are not mandatory.
4.7.2 Grid support and low voltage ride through (LVRT) or FRT (section 1.3 with Appendix D12)
Based on the measured and assessed behaviour during faults of the renewable generation unit (see section 3.5),
the behaviour of the renewable generation plant at the PCC shall be assessed. If a validated software model is
available it shall be used for the assessment of the renewable generation plant. It shall be assessed, if the
requirements are fulfilled at the PCC. Therefore, the criteria of the defined Grid Code or the requirements of the
grid operator shall be taken into account.
4.7.3 Operation with grid frequency, which is diverging from nominal frequency
For the evaluation of the operability of the renewable generation plant with decreased or increased grid frequency
the protection settings at the PCC shall be assessed according to the requirements of the Grid Code or the local
5 Tests
5.1 General
For verification this technical note refers to test and evaluation methods given in the standards and guidelines
mentioned in chapter 6. Measurement reports by accredited measuring institutes for the tests given in section 4.2
and other tests, which are to be agreed upon, are part of the assessment documents. These have to be provided
to GL for assessment.
The voltage drop can be achieved using a reactor by short-circuiting of two and three phases at the unit side of
the impedance. The test set up according to IEC 61400-21 [5], section 7.5 can be used (two reactors Z1 and Z2
Note: First of all functional tests shall be performed without voltage. These tests shall show the safe-functionality
of the test equipment. For safety and security reasons, tests with lower risk shall be done first. See also [1] or [15]
etc.
The power factor shall be determined and documented for each test. At least the whole time range from five
seconds before connecting the impedance Z1 before the start of the voltage drop until the effect of the voltage
drop has abated shall be recorded. It is recommended to record 15 seconds before and 15 seconds after the
onset of the emulated fault. The power factor at the grid side of the test equipment shall not change significantly
during each test recording.
During each of the following tests the following instantaneous values shall be recorded at all measuring points
MP1, MP2 and MP3 with a sampling rate of at least 5 kHz of all three phases:
a. currents
b. voltages
During the test, in case of wind turbines when the unit is operating at least the following instantaneous values
shall be measured and recorded additionally (sampling rate must be at least 10 Hz):
a. rotational speed for wind, corresponding value for other generation units (optional, relevant for structural
integrity, see section 3.9)
b. pitch angle of one rotor blade for wind turbines, corresponding value for other generation units (optional,
relevant for structural integrity, see section 3.9)
c. measurement of the mechanical torque on the rotor shaft as specified in IEC TS 61400-13 [8] for wind
turbines, corresponding value for other generation units (optional, relevant for structural integrity, see
section 3.9)
Note: The recording of these four values shall enable a comparison between the actual unit behavior and the
assumed unit behavior during the load simulations as required in section 3.9 of this technical note.
During test for any other renewable generation, the primary source of energy shall be measured (e.g solar
radiation in case of PV)
5.3.2.2.1 General
The tests shall be done with 3 voltage levels (, and ), for 2 durations (t1 and t2), with two loading levels (low
power and high power) as 3-phase voltage drop (3p) and as 2-phase voltage drop (2p).
For an overview, the following table can be used; details are explained in the following sections.
Category Loading Dip type Voltage for Test voltage levels Test durations
1 Low power 3p U, U, U, optional 0% t1, t1, t1, ,t2,
t2, t2
2 High power 3p U, U, U, optional 0% t1, t1, t1, ,t2,
t2, t2
3 Low power 2p not U, U, U, optional 0% t1, t1, t1, ,t2,
involving t2, t2
earth
4 High power 2p not U, U, U, optional 0% t1, t1, t1, ,t2,
involving t2, t2
earth
Table 5-1: Voltage dip test overview (and categories for section 5.3.3)
Small voltage dip ( dip) down to the test voltage level U as defined in equation (5.1):
U 0.7 * (U N U ) U (5.1)
Half voltage dip ( dip) down to the test voltage level U as defined in equation (5.2):
U 0.5 * (U N U ) U (5.2)
Minimum test requires a voltage dip ( dip) down to the test voltage level U as defined in (5.3):
U minimum voltage according to Grid Code requirement (5.3)
U
U
t [s]
t1
t1
t1
t2
t2
t2
Fig. 5-1: Voltage dip definitions see also Section 5.3.2.2.3 and 5.3.2.2.4
The test voltage levels shall be generated with heavy test equipment according to section 5.3.1. For each
certification the values of all test voltage levels shall be determined and documented, e. g. in a test plan.
The longest test time t2 depends on the respective Grid Code and will be defined for each certification process.
After voltage recovery the time trecover shall be determined.
*) generator speed below synchronous speed in the case of a doubly fed induction generator for wind turbines
Table 5-3: Loading level for voltage dip tests
If the Grid Code requires auto-reclosing-cycles at least two of the above listed tests shall be done in a way to
simulate automatic reclosure cycles. Should there be no detailed requirements given in the Grid Code, two double
dips shall be performed with a pause of 500 ms between voltage recovery of the first and voltage drop of the
second dip in both cases, at minimum.
U
t [s]
t2 500 ms t2
5.3.2.3 0% Test
This test is an optional test in those cases, where the corresponding Grid Code requires U > 0%. The 0%-test
shall be performed according to section 5.3.2.2 using the following parameters:
test duration shall be short test time (100ms) and longest reasonable test time. Two single voltage
drops shall be passed successfully
test voltage level shall be below Ures = 5% Un with low power only (see section 5.3.2.2.4)
test duration shall be short test time (100ms) and long test time (1s) or extra long (>1s) if necessary,
see below
two consecutive dip tests shall be passed successfully
test voltage level shall be U with low primary energy potential only, 1p
The trip-test is explained in the following. After successfully surviving the first part of a voltage dip (voltage
dropped to a defined test voltage level) a generation unit could get in trouble in the case that the voltage does not
recover and the turbine shall switch off during or after the fault (within the fault mode of the generation unit’s
control). In such cases it is important, that the generation unit is tested for a case with a voltage dip of such
duration (i.e. simulating a black-out), that the generation unit’s control is cutting off during the fault-mode to shut
shut down due to the fact, that this voltage dip duration is longer than required by the Grid Code
shut down, due to the fact, that the control detected the voltage to be outside the LVRT definition
curve of the Grid Code
In the second case, it is possible to reduce the test time for the until-cut-off test (trip-test) compared to the longest
LVRT test, provided corresponding explanations and documentation is provided for GL assessment and the result
is plausible.
In general the specification of until-cut-off test (trip-test) shall be combined with the phase-to-earth test with the
following parameters:
5.3.2.6 Procedure to establish evidence for LVRT for 60 Hz having made tests in 50 Hz only
If tests were performed in 50 Hz the validated software model (GCC) can be used for simulations in 60 Hz,
optionally the corresponding small scale low voltage dip tests of the auxiliary supply system according to this
technical note can be performed and passed successfully in a 60 Hz grid. The same shall apply vice versa, if full
scale measurements and tests were performed in a 60 Hz grid.
Low Voltage Ride Through (LVRT) test and measurement shall be made at a renewable generation unit in either
50 Hz or 60 Hz grid according to this technical note.
For validation of a simulation model, simulations shall be done with a simulation model of the same cases as
tested and measured in section 5.3.2.2 categories 1 and 2. Furthermore a plausibility check of the simulation
model is required.
Comparison of the results from test and measurement in 50 Hz with simulation in 50 Hz shall be done for
validation of the simulation model. This validation process shall be done as described in this technical note.
Adaptation of the model shall be done for simulations in 60 Hz grid, including system parameters – short circuit
impedance, transformer characteristics, system frequency etc. The changes in the adapted model shall be
assessed by GL for plausibility.
Assessment shall be done if success criteria are fulfilled according to the respective Grid Codes and the
simulation in 60 Hz.
Test and measurement in a generation unit of the same type (equal generator, main frequency converter hard-
and software as well as medium voltage transformer) connected to a 60 Hz Grid shall be done with a reduced
scope compared to test and measurement. Tests are necessary only if components of the 60Hz-variant are
changed compared to the 50Hz-variant.
It shall be assessed if success criteria are fulfilled according to the respective Grid Codes. Minimum success
criterion is the continuous, uninterrupted operation of the generation unit until recovery of maximum available
output power after voltage has recovered.
− the measurement institute shall check, if the renewable generation unit is regularly online 10 seconds
after the test is over (standard production mode). This shall be stated as one criterion whether the test is
passed or not.
− a second criterion is fulfilled, if the renewable generation unit did not disconnect during 2 consecutive
tests (2 durations (t1 and t2)) within one category (see Table 5-1). If disconnection took place the tests of
this category are only regarded as passed, if the following 4 tests of the same category did not lead to
disconnection of the renewable generation unit from the grid. If disconnection takes place again within
these following 4 tests, the tests of this category are regarded as invalid. In case of a failed test and
unexpected behavior of the renewable generation unit, the test shall be aborted and the reason of the
failure shall be corrected for prevention of danger before new testing can take place.
[2] FGW TR8 Technical Guidelines for Power Generating Units, Part 8: Certification of the
electrical characteristics of power generating units and systems in the medium-, high- and
highest-voltage grids, Rev. 6 or newer, Fördergesellschaft Windenergie und andere
Erneuerbare Energien (FGW e.V.), Germany
[3] FGW TR3 Technical Guideline for Wind Turbines-Part 3: Establish electrical characteristics of
generating units connected to the medium-, high- and extra high voltage level (Technische
Richtlinien für Windenergieanlagen – Teil 3 Bestimmung der Elektrischen Eigenschaften von
Erzeugungseinheiten am Mittel-, Hoch- und Höchstspannungsnetz), Rev. 23 or newer,
Fördergesellschaft Windenergie und andere Erneuerbare Energien (FGW e.V.), Germany
[4] TN 066 Technical Note (TN 066), Certification of Grid Code Compliance (GCC) Test
procedure for low voltage ride through (LVRT), Rev. 8, 31.07.2013 of GL Renewables
Certification.
[5] IEC 61400-21 Wind turbine generator systems – Part 21: Measurement and assessment of
power quality characteristics of grid connected wind turbines
[6] IEC 61400-12 Wind turbine generator systems – Part 12: Wind turbine power performance
testing
[8] IEC TS 61400-13 Wind turbine generator systems – Part 13: Measurement of mechanical
loads
[9] FGW TR4 Technical guidelines for power generating units, Part 4: Demands on modelling and
validating simulation models of the electrical characteristics of power generating units and
systems, Rev. 6 or newer, Fördergesellschaft Windenergie und andere Erneuerbare Energien
(FGW e.V.), Germany
[10] bdew MV-Guideline Technical guideline generating plants connected to the medium-voltage
network guideline for generating plants connection to and parallel operation with the medium-
voltage network, June 2008, BDEW Bundesverband der Energie- und Wasserwirtschaft e.V.,
Germany.
[12] RD661 10556, ROYAL DECRETO 661/2007, de 25 de mayo, por el que se regula la actividad
de producción de energía eléctrica en régimen especial, BOE num. 126, issued 2007-05-26,
page 22846, Spain (Royal ordinance for special electrical energy production scheme)
[14] IEC 61400-22: 2010 Wind turbines – Part 22: Conformity testing and certification, Edition 1.0
2010-05
[15] Germanischer Lloyd Industrial Services GmbH, Renewables Certification „GL Rules and
Guidelines - IV Industrial Services - Part 1 - Guideline for the Certification of Wind Turbines“,
Edition 2010.
[16] IEC WT01 IEC System for conformity testing and certification of wind turbines, rules and
procedures, first edition 2001-04
[17] Germanischer Lloyd Industrial Services GmbH, Renewables Certification „GL Rules and
Guidelines, IV, Part 2, Guideline for the Certification of Offshore Wind Turbines“, Edition 2012
[18] FGW TR2 Technical Guideline for Wind Turbines-Part 2: Establish power performance and
standardised production (Technische Richtlinien für Windenergieanlagen – Teil 2:
Bestimmung von Leistungskurve und standardisierten Energieerträgen) Fördergesellschaft
Windenergie und andere Erneuerbare Energien (FGW e.V.), Germany
[19] Technical Note (TN 65) „Certification of Grid Code Compliance (GCC), Certification
procedure“, Revision 8, issued 2013-07-31 by Germanischer Lloyd Industrial Services GmbH
Renewables Certification, Germany
[20] „Generic Grid Code Format for Wind Power Plants“issued on 2009-11-27 by EWEA,
http://www.ewea.org/fileadmin/ewea_documents/documents/publications/091127_GGCF_Fin
al_Draft.pdf
[21] „IGCC List, International Grid Code Comparison“,issued on a regular basis by GL,
http://www.gl-group.com/pdf/IGCC_list.pdf
[22] „Technical rule for connecting wind farm to power system“, GB/T 19963, issued 2012 by
China Electric Power Research Institute (CEPRI), China
[23] „Technical rule for photovoltaic power station connected to Power Grid“, Q/GDW 617-2011,
issued 2011-05-06 by State Grid Corporation of China (SGCC), China
[24] „Test procedure of wind turbine low voltage ride through ability “, draft issued by National
Energy Bureau (NEB), China
[25] „Guideline for Modeling and Validation of Wind Turbine Low Voltage Ride Through
Characteristics“, draft issued by National Energy Bureau (NEB), China
[26] „Electric Simulation Model and Validation Method of Wind Farm“, draft issued by National
Energy Bureau (NEB), China
[27] “Type Certification of Wind Turbines”, DNV Service Specification DNV-DSS-904, January
2012, DNV
The most left column of the following listing gives the short code numbering (titled with #) of the GCC
Parameters which could be chosen as criterion for certification. Together with the column titled with
“Requirement” it is possible to address each single parameter of the listing for a detailed set of criteria for
certification by ordering more than one GCC parameter as criterion for certification.
Following technical terms and definitions are taken from the Generic Grid Code Format (Link:
http://www.ewea.org/fileadmin/ewea_documents/documents/publications/091127_GGCF_Final_Draft.pdf )
issued by EWEA. They were adapted to this Technical note and different numbering has been applied due
to that.
# R1 through R14: Frequency, voltage and power rating (steady state performance)
# D1 through D11: Dynamic performance of Frequency gradient and power ramp rates during normal
operation
# D12 through D16: Dynamic performance of Frequency gradient and power ramp rates during FRT
# P: Plant status
UQ-chart.
If the intended requirement is not solely
clear from the UQ-chart in itself, the
UQ-chart shall be associated with a text
thoroughly explaining the requirement.
The figures are included for example
only to indicate the intention with this
parameter.
G y/n
L y/n
M y/n
Active power delta control mode: This
is a special active power control mode. X
If this control mode is required,
functionality and parameters and any
interdependence to other required
control requirements shall be clearly
specified.
N y/n
D10 Q Review-approval x
(dead time)
D11 Z Review-approval x
unbalanced faults.
D12 D Reclosure x
D13 BB Definitions x
D14 Injection
parameters
Spain:
Germany:
fault.
D16 A Description x
Int Communication x
and control
interface
P Plant status x
information
P1 C out of operation x
network
P2 A Wind direction x
P2 B Ambient temperature °C
P2 C Atmospheric pressure Pa
M2 Simulation
platform
M2 A Simulation platform x
M3 Model
documentation
M3 A Black-box x
M3 B White-box x
M3 C Model verification x
M3 D Updating requirement x
M4 System planning x
simulation models
M4 A Description x
M4 B Modelling description x
M4 C Modelling parameters x
M4 D Modelling documentation x
M4 E Model verification x
M4 F Updating requirement x
S Site specific X
Data
C1 Certification/ Description x
verification
C2 Commissioning Description
C2 A Performance testing X
C2 B Description X
C2 E Performance testing: X
C2 L - Run-back y/n
C2 R - Inertia y/n
s Seconds
V Volt
A Ampere
VA reactive power