Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 143

CLIENT: BORDER ROAD ORGANIZATION

PROJECT : HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE (P) HMK-11/2015-16)

CONTRACTOR SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.

RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.


STRUCTURAL
N-43, SRINIWASPURI, NEW DELHI -110065
CONSULTANT
: 011-26845128, 011-26935520

DESIGN OF SUBSTRUCTURE CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE


TITLE FOUNDATION UPTO BOTTOM OF PILE CAP AT KM 150.400
ON D-S-DBO ROAD UNDER 50 BRTF (PART-1 -PIER)

Revision
Document No. RDA/SGI/H/C-04
0

RECORD OF REVISIONS

REV DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED


DATE DETAILS
NO. BY BY BY

R0 20-03-17 Issued for Approval RDA DKU


INDEX

S. No. DESCRIPTION PAGE NO.

1. SALIENT FEATURES OF BRIDGE 1-5


2. FORCES DUE TO SELFWEIGHT OF SUB_STRUCTURE & 6-9
FOUNDATION
3. CREEP 10-11
4. SUPER STRUCTURE DEAD LOAD 12
5. SNOW LOAD 13
6. LIVE LOAD 14-16
7. LONGITUDINAL FORCES 17-19
8. SEISMIC FORCE CALCULATION: 20-21
SEISMIC FORCE CALCULATIONS FOR BRIDGE ELEMENTS
9. SUPERSTRUCTURE 22-23
10. LIVE LOAD 24-26
11. LONGITUDINAL FORCES 27-28
12. SUBSTRUCTURE 29
13. WIND LOAD 30-31
14. WATER CURRENT FORCE 32-34
15. HYDRODYNAMIC FORCE 35-37
16. MAXIMUM & MINIMUM PILE REACTIONS 38-54
17. ULS – MAX. MIN. PILE REACTIONS 55-63
18. ULS – DESIGN FORCES FOR PILE CAP 64-65
19. ULS- DESIGN LOADS FOR PIER SHAFT 66-67
20. PILE CAP DESIGN 68-78
21. PILE INTERACTION 79
22. ULS- PILE MOMENT CAPACITY 80-84
23. SLS- MIN. & MAX. REACTIONS OVER PILE 85-87
24. SLS- DESIGN FORCES FOR PILE CAP 88
25. SLS-DESIGN LOADS FOR PIER SHAFT 89-90
26. SLS-STRESS CHECK FOR PILE 91-94
27. UN-FACTORED DESIGN FORCES FOR PIER SHAFT 95-98
28. ULS- FORCES FOR PIER SHAFT 99-100
29. ULS- DESIGN FOR PIER SHAFT 101-119
30. SLS- STRESS CHECK FOR PIER 120-126
31. PIER CAP 127-139
Annex.: SCHEDULE OF REINFORCEMENT FOR SUBSTRUCTURE
** SPECIAL NOTES
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

SALIENT FEATURES OF BRIDGE :


Left Span Right Span
Span c/c of brg. span.bea.l 43.28 m span.bea.r 43.28 m
c/L of brg. c/L of exp. J ej.bea.l 0.175 m ej.bea.r 0.175 m
Exp. Gap ej.l 40.00 mm ej.r 40.00 mm
Overall span span.l 43.42 m span.r 43.42 m

Depth of super-structure sup.dep.l 0.647 m sup.dep.r 0.647 m


Minimum height of End X-Girder above Girder soffit 0 m 0.25 m
Wearing Coat thickness wc.thk 0 mm 0 mm
Depth of Bearing + Pedestal (minimum) bea.ht.l 300 mm bea.ht.r 500 mm

.
TD
Overall carriageway width ow 6m
Clear carriageway width cw 4.25 m
Cross Camber cr.cam 0.00%

MATERIAL USED & THERE PROPERTIES :


CONCRETE
Grade of Concrete fck = M 35 Mpa
Mean value of concrete compressive strength fcm = M 45 Mpa
Design Concrete compressive strength fcd = 0.447 *fck
= 15.63 MPa
Secant Modulus of Elasticity Ecm = M 32308.2 MPa
Mean axial tensile strength fctm = 2.77 Mpa

REINFORCING STEEL
Grade of Reinforcement fyk = Fe 500 Mpa
Design yield strength of reinforcement fyd = 0.870 *fyk
= 434.78 Mpa
Modulus of Elasticity Es = 200000 Mpa

3
RCC Density γrcc 2.5 t/m
3
Dry density of earth γearth 2 t/m

ANALYSES ASSUMPTION
Enviromental parameters
Relative humidity = 51 %
Exposure condition = Severe

Relative humidity is taken as 45% for the calculation of stresses to keep differential shrinkage on conservative side.
Otherwise the exposure condition is severe, therefore minimum cover shall be 45mm.

Modulus of Elasticity for Concrete


For short Term loading Ecm = 32308.25 Mpa
For long Term loading Ecm' = Ecm/ (1+)
 = Creep coefficent

Creep coefficent for Foundation  = 1 ( As ho =  , For foundations)


Ecm' = 16154.1 Mpa
Page 1 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Creep for pier shaft


Cross-sectional Area Ac = 7.39 m2
Perimeter in contact with atmosphere u = 12.21 m
Notational size ho 2Ac/u = 1210.6 mm
Age of concrete at the time of loading to = 90 days
t considered = 25550 days
 = 1.57 (Refer Appendix B)
 1.73 *(Increased by 10% on the conservative side)
2
Ecm' = 11848.3 N/mm

.
Creep for pier cap

TD
Cross-sectional Area Ac = 3.50 m2
Perimeter in contact with atmosphere u = 7.50 m
Notational size ho 2Ac/u = 933.333 mm
Age of concrete at the time of loading to = 90 days
t considered = 25550 days
 = 1.61 (Refer Appendix B)
 1.78 *(Increased by 10% on the conservative side)
2
Ecm' = 11638.0 N/mm

SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE :


Max permissible Stress in Concrete
Rare Combination = 0.48*fck = 16.8 Mpa
Quasi permanent Combination = 0.36*fck = 12.6 Mpa

Max permissible Stress in Steel = 0.8*fyk = 400 Mpa


Max permissible Stress in Steel(rare) = = 300 Mpa
Permissible crack width wk,max = 0.2 mm

SEISMIC PARAMETER
Seismic Zone = IV
Type of soil = medium
Zone factor Z = 0.24
Importance factor I = 1.5
Response Reduction Factor, Rlong. = 3
Response Reduction Factor, Rtrans. = 3
Response Reduction Factor, Rvert. = 3

Page 2 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

LEVEL DETAILS :
Formation level FRL 4383.297 m
Lowest Bed Level LBL 4375.010 m (Min Bed Level)
Ground Level GL 4375.670 m
Lowest water level LWL 4375.415 m
Highest flood Level HFL 4378.106 m (As per Hydrological Calculation)
MSL Normal Condition MSL.N 4371.000 m
MSL Seismic Condition MSL.S 4371.711

Pile Cap Top Level el.plc.t 4375.5 m

.
TD
Thickness of Pile Cap plc.thk 1.500 m
Pile Cap Bottom Level el.plc.b 4374.000 m

Pile Outer Diameter pl.O.dia 0.273 m Casing Thickness 8 mm


Pile Inner Diameter pl.dia 0.257 m

Pile capacity pl.capa.n 40.0 T */(Non-Seismic case)


pl.capa.s 50.0 T */(Seismic Case)

Page 3 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

.
TD
Bearing Top 4382.650
0.3 Cap Top 4382.150

1.294 2.706 2.706

Nos. of Girder = 2 Nos.


C/c of Girder = 2.706 m
Width of Top Flange = 1.2 m

PIER COMPONENT :-

1.000 1.000 FRL : 4383.297

Fix Bearing Top: 4382.650


Cap Top : 4382.150
1 0.875
1.75
2 0.875 Cap Bottom 4380.400

0.25 1.5 0.25

2.00
4.900

3
GL 4375.670

3.25 3.25
Pile Cap Top 4375.500

1.5
5
Pile Cap Bottom 4374.000

Page 4 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

1.294

2.706

.
TD
8

2.706

1.294

1 0.875 Cap Top 4382.150

2b 2a 2c
0.875 Cap Bottom 4380.400

1.375

1.375 5.25

3b
8

5.25
3a
3.75

3b

3.25 1.5 3.25


8
Page 5 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

FORCES DUE TO SELFWEIGHT OF SUB_STRUCTURE & FOUNDATION :


Forces @ pile cap bottom (L-T) Axis
eL = Cg. from c/L of pile group (along L-L axis)
eT = Cg. Form c/L of pile group ( along T-T axis)
eY = Cg. From cg of pile group

Calculating Selfweight of Sub-structure :


Element Area Factor B H L V W eY eL eT
3
m m m m T m m m
Pier cap

.
TD
1 1 2.000 0.875 8.000 14.0 35.0 7.713 0.000 0.000
2a 1 2.000 0.875 5.250 9.2 23.0 6.838 0.000 0.000
2b 1 2.000 0.875 1.375 2.4 6.0 6.983 0.000 -3.083
2c 1 2.000 0.875 1.375 2.4 6.0 6.983 0.000 3.083

Total 28.00 70.00 7.30 0.00 0.00


*/ Increase Abutment cap weight by 10% on account of bearing, bearing pedestal, stopper etc.
Pier Cap weight Considered 30.80 77.00 7.30 0.00 0.00
Pier Shaft
3a 1 1.5 4.90 3.75 27.56 68.9 3.95 0.00 0.00
3b 0.7854 1.5 4.90 1.5 8.66 21.6 3.95 0.00 0.00

shaft weight considered. 36.22 90.55 3.95 0.00 0.00


Total Sub-structure self weight at pile cap bottom 67.02 167.55 5.49 0.00 0.000

Calculating Selfweight Pile Cap:


Element Area Fact No.s B H L V W eY eL eT
3
m m m m Tonne m m m
Pile Cap
7 1 1 8 1.5 8 96.00 240.00 0.75 0 0

Total Footing weight 96.00 240.00 0.75 0.00 0.00

Total Sub-structure + Pile Cap 163.02 407.55 2.70 0.00 0.00

Total Weight of sub-structure & foundation = 407.55 T


Lever arm from cg of pile cap (along LL axis) = 0.00 m
Moment MTT = 0.00 Tm

Lever arm about c/L base (along TT axis) = 0.00 m


Moment MLL = 0.07 Tm

Page 6 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Calculating Weight of Earthfill


Maximum Earthfill Case
Element Area Fact No.s B H L V W eY eL eT
m m m m3 Tonne m m m

Earth Fill Weight


8 1 1 8 0.170 8 10.88 21.76 1.59 0 0
9 1 -1 1.5 0.170 3.75 -0.96 -1.91 1.59 0 0
10 0.785 -1 1.5 0.170 1.5 -0.30 -0.60 1.59 0 0

.
Total Earth Fill 9.62 19.25 1.59 0.00 0.00

TD
Total Weight of Earthfill = 19.25 T
Lever arm from cg of pile cap (along X'X' axis) = 0.00 m
Moment MZ'Z' = 0.00 Tm

Lever arm about c/L base (along Z'-Z' axis) = 0.00 m


Moment MX'X' = 0.00 Tm

Minmum Earthfill Case


Element Area Fact No.s B H L V W eY eL eT
3
m m m m Tonne m m m

Earth Fill Weight


8 1 1 8 0.000 8 0.00 0.00 1.50 0 0
9 1 -1 1.5 0.000 3.75 0.00 0.00 1.50 0 0
10 0.785 -1 1.5 0.000 1.5 0.00 0.00 1.50 0 0

Total Earth Fill 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total Weight of Earthfill = 0.00 T


Lever arm from cg of pile cap (along X'X' axis) = 0.00 m
Moment MZ'Z' = 0.00 Tm

Lever arm about c/L base (along Z'-Z' axis) = 0.00 m


Moment MX'X' = 0.00 Tm

Water Load over Pile Cap


I) LWL
i) Maximum Case
Element Area Fact No.s B H L V W eY eL eT
3
m m m m Tonne m m m

Water Weight
8 1 1 8 0.000 8 0.00 0.00 1.50 0 0
9 1 -1 1.5 0.000 3.75 0.00 0.00 1.50 0 0
10 0.785 -1 1.5 0.000 1.5 0.00 0.00 1.50 0 0

Page 7 of 139
Total Water
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

ii) Minimum Case


Element Area Fact No.s B H L V W eY eL eT
m m m m3 Tonne m m m

Water Weight
8 1 1 8 0.000 8 0.00 0.00 1.50 0 0
9 1 -1 1.5 0.000 3.75 0.00 0.00 1.50 0 0
10 0.785 -1 1.5 0.000 1.5 0.00 0.00 1.50 0 0

.
Total Water 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

TD
II) HFL
i) Maximum Case
Element Area Fact No.s B H L V W eY eL eT
3
m m m m Tonne m m m

Water Weight
8 1 1 8 2.436 8 155.90 155.90 2.72 0 0
9 1 -1 1.5 2.436 3.75 -13.70 -13.70 2.72 0 0
10 0.785 -1 1.5 2.436 1.5 -4.30 -4.30 2.72 0 0

Total Water 137.90 137.90 2.72 0.00 0.00

ii) Minimum Case


Element Area Fact No.s B H L V W eY eL eT
m m m m3 Tonne m m m

Water Weight
8 1 1 8 2.606 8 166.78 166.78 2.80 0 0
9 1 -1 1.5 2.606 3.75 -14.66 -14.66 2.80 0 0
10 0.785 -1 1.5 2.606 1.5 -4.61 -4.61 2.80 0 0

Total Water 147.52 147.52 2.80 0.00 0.00

Calculation of Bouyancy

HFL Condition
Element Area Fact Nos. B H L V W eY eL eT
3
m m m m T m m m
Pier cap
1 1 -1 2.000 0.000 8.000 0.0 0.0 7.275 0.000 0.000
2a 1 -1 2.000 0.000 5.250 0.0 0.0 6.400 0.000 0.000
2b 0.5 -1 2.000 0.000 0.000 0.0 0.0 6.400 0.000 -2.625
2c 0.5 -1 2.000 0.000 0.000 0.0 0.0 6.400 0.000 2.625

Pier Shaft
3a 1 -1 1.5 2.61 3.75 -14.66 -36.6 2.80 0.000 0.000
3b 0.7854 -1 1.5 2.61 1.5 -4.61 -11.5 2.80 0.000 0.000

Pile Cap
Page 8 of 139
SPAR GEO7 INFRA PVT.
1 LTD. -1 8 1.5 8 -96.00 -240.00 0.75 0.000 0.000
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Total Bottom of pile cap -115.3 -288.2 1.0931156 0 0


Bottom of Shaft -19.3 -48.2 1.303 0 0

Total buoyant weight = -288.2 T


Lever arm about toe (along L-L axis) = 0m
Moment MTT = 0 Tm

Lever arm about c/L base (along T-T axis) = 0m


Moment MLL = 0 Tm

.
TD
LWL Condition

Element Area Fact Nos. B H L V W eY eL eT


3
m m m m T m m m
Pier cap
1 1 -1 2.000 0.000 8.000 0.0 0.0 7.275 0.000 0.000
2a 1 -1 2.000 0.000 5.250 0.0 0.0 6.400 0.000 0.000
2b 0.5 -1 2.000 0.000 0.000 0.0 0.0 6.400 0.000 -2.625
2c 0.5 -1 2.000 0.000 0.000 0.0 0.0 6.400 0.000 2.625

Pier Shaft
3a 1 -1 1.5 0.00 3.75 0.00 0.0 2.80 0.000 0.000
3b 0.7854 -1 1.5 0.00 1.5 0.00 0.0 2.80 0.000 0.000

Pile Cap
7 1 -1 8 1.415 8 -90.56 -226.40 0.75 0.000 0.000

Total Bottom of pile cap -90.6 -226.4 0.750 0.000 0.000


Bottom of Shaft 0.0 0.0 0.000 0.000 0.000

Total buoyant weight = -226.4 T


Lever arm about toe (along L-L axis) = 0.000 m
Moment MTT = 0 Tm

Lever arm about c/L base (along T-T axis) = 0.000 m


Moment MLL = 0 Tm

Page 9 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Finding creep coefficent for Pier shaft

fck = 35 Mpa (Considering Precat Beam material)

fcm = 45 Mpa

t = 25550 days
to = 90 days

 (t, to) = o c( t , to )

o = RHfcmto

.
TD
RH = 1+ 1 - RH/100 for fcm ≤ 45 Mpa
1/3
0.1 ( ho )

1+ 1 - RH/100 for fcm > 45 Mpa


1/3  
0.1 ( ho )

RH = Relative humidity
= 51 %

ho = 1210.6 mm

1 = [ 43.75 / fcm ]0.7 = 0.98047

 = [ 43.75 / fcm ]0.2 = 0.99438

RH = 1.45976

fcm = 18.78 / √fcm


= 2.79956

to = 1/ (0.1+ to0.2)


= 0.3907

o = 1.59666

c( t , to) = [ (t-to) / (H +t -to) ]0.3

H = Min 1.5 [ 1+ (0.012 RH)18 ] ho +250 for fcm ≤ 35 Mpa


1500

Min 1.5 [ 1+ (0.012 RH)18 ] ho +250 3 for fcm > 35 Mpa


1500* 3

 = [ 43.75 / fcm ]0.5 = 0.986


H = 1479.02
c( t , to) = 0.983
 (t, to) = 1.57

Page 10 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Finding creep coefficent for Pier cap :

fck = 35 Mpa (Considering Precat Beam material)

fcm = 45 Mpa

t = 25550 days
to = 90 days

 (t, to) = o c( t , to )

o = RHfcmto

.
TD
RH = 1+ 1 - RH/100 for fcm ≤ 45 Mpa
1/3
0.1 ( ho )

1+ 1 - RH/100 for fcm > 45 Mpa


1/3  
0.1 ( ho )

RH = Relative humidity
= 51 %

ho = 933.333 mm

1 = [ 43.75 / fcm ]0.7 = 0.980

 = [ 43.75 / fcm ]0.2 = 0.994

RH = 1.501

fcm = 18.78 / √fcm


= 2.800

to = 1/ (0.1+ to0.2)


= 0.391

o = 1.642

c( t , to) = [ (t-to) / (H +t -to) ]0.3

H = Min 1.5 [ 1+ (0.012 RH)18 ] ho +250 for fcm ≤ 35 Mpa


1500

Min 1.5 [ 1+ (0.012 RH)18 ] ho +250 3 for fcm > 35 Mpa


1500* 3

 = [ 43.75 / fcm ]0.5 = 0.986

H = 1479.02

c( t , to) = 0.983


 (t, to) = 1.61

Page 11 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Super Structure Dead Load Cg. From Deck


Weight Top
Total Weight = 120.00 T 0.32 m

.
TD

Page 12 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Snow Load
Cg above Deck Top = 0.50 m

Forces @ c/L of Pile cap


Forces @ L-T axis at c/L Pile Cap bottom Left span Right span
Vertical Load (Sup DL Reaction) = 22.67 Tonne 22.67 Tonne
Moment MTT = 4.1 Tm 4.1 Tm
Moment MLL = 0.0 Tm 0.0 Tm
Cg. From pile cap bottom = 9.8 m 9.8 m

.
TD

Page 13 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

FINDING LIVE LOAD REACTIONS OVER PIER

.
43.417 43.417

TD
43.28 43.28

SPAN_1 0.067 43.28 0.067 0.000 0.067 43.28 0.067

CLASS A
TYPE 1 2.7 2.7 11.4 11.4 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8
DIST 1.1 3.2 1.2 4.3 3 3 3
6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 11.4 11.4 2.7 2.7
3 3 3 4.3 1.2 3.2 1.1

CLASS 70R Wheeled


TYPE 2 17 17 17 17 12 12 8
DIST 1.37 3.05 1.37 2.13 1.52 3.96
8 12 12 17 17 17 17
3.96 1.52 2.13 1.37 3.05 1.37

CLASS 70R Tracked


TYPE 3 7 14 14 14 14 7
DIST 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95

Overall carriageway width = 6.000 m


Clear carriageway width = 4.25 m
Left Span Right Span
Class 70RW if.70RW.l 1.155 if.70RW.r 1.155
Impact Factor
Class A if.A.l 0.159 if.A.r 0.159

Excluding Impact Factor Combined


70RW Class A
Load
Reaction Trans. Reaction Trans. Reaction MLL Trans.
Page 14 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

R11 R22 R33 eccn R11 R22 R33 eccn R11 R22 R33 R22 L span R span eccn
Rmax (T) (T) (T) (m) (T) (T) (T) (m) (T) (T) (T) (T) (T-m) (T-m) (m)

.
TD
Class 70RW - 1 4 93 3 -1 0 0 0 9 200 7 200 -118 -126 -1.22
Class 70RT - 1 1 68 1 -1 0 0 0 3 147 2 147 -93 -94 -1.28
Class A - 1 Lane 0 0 0 0 5 49 1 0.075 6 57 1 57 2 2 0.08
Pmax 9 200 7 200 -118 -126 -1.220

Excluding Impact Factor Combined

Load
70RW Class A
Reaction Trans. Reaction Trans. Reaction MLL Trans.
R11 R22 R33 eccn R11 R22 R33 eccn R11 R22 R33 R22 L span R span eccn
Mmax (T) (T) (T) (m) (T) (T) (T) (m) (T) (T) (T) (T) (T-m) (T-m) (m)

Class 70RW - 1 0 88 12 -1.220 0 0 0 0 189 26 189 0 -231 -1.220


Class 70RT - 1 0 66 4 -1.275 0 0 0 0 143 8 143 0 -182 -1.275
Class A - 1 Lane 0 0 0 0.000 0 44 11.592 0.075 0 51 13 51 0 4 0.075
Maxmax 0 189 26 189 0 -231 -1.220

Page 15 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Cg above FRL = 1.20 m

.
TD
Maximum Reaction case :

Forces @ L-T axis at c/L Pile Cap bottom Left span Right span
Vertical Load (LL Reaction) = 96.3 T 103.3 T
Eccentricity from c/L of pier in longitudinal dir. n = 0.00 m 0.00 m
Moment MTT = 0.0 Tm 0.0 Tm
Eccentricity from c/L of pier in transverse dir. n = -1.22 m -1.22 m
Moment MLL = -117.5 Tm -126.1 Tm
Cg. From pile cap bottom = 10.5 m 10.5 m

Maximum Moment case :


Forces @ L-T axis at c/L Pile Cap bottom Left span Right span
Vertical Load (LL Reaction) = 0.0 T 189.4 T
Eccentricity from c/L of pier in longitudinal dir. n = 0.00 m 0.00 m
Moment MTT = 0.0 Tm 0.0 Tm
Eccentricity from c/L of pier in transverse dir. n = -1.22 m -1.22 m
Moment MLL = 0.0 Tm -231.1 Tm
Cg. From pile cap bottom = 10.5 m 10.5 m

Page 16 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Calculation of Longitudinal Forces


Horizontal force at bearing level in the longitudinal direction at fixed bearing (other than elastomeric bearing)
i) Fh -  (Rg +Rq) Refer Clause 211.5 IRC: 6-2010
= Maximum of
ii) Fh / 2 +  (Rg + Rq)
Where
Fh = Applied Horizontal force
Rg = Reaction at free end due to dead load and Snow load
Rq = Reaction at free end due to live load load
 = Coefficent of Friction at movable bearing = 0.03 or 0.05 which ever

.
TD
govern
* Fh (breaking force) is considered 20 % of the first train load + 10 % of the load of the succeeding trains or
part thereof.

Reaction due to dead load and Snow load at free end of left & right span
Load description Left span Right span
Tonne Tonne
DL 60.00 60.00
Snow load 22.67 22.67
Surfacing 0.00 0.00

Rg 82.67 82.67

Live load reaction


Live load Load case R11 R22 R33
1) Maximum Reaction case 9 200 7
2) Maximum Moment case 0 189 26

Page 17 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Maximum Moment Case Maximum Reaction Case


Expansion Case Expansion Case
S11 S22 S33 S11 S22 S33
Reaction 0 189 26 Reaction 9 200 7
Rg 165.34 Rg 165.34
Fh 0.00 11.08 Fh 41.79 1.31
 0.05 0.03  0.05 0.03
Fh‐R 2.813 - Fh‐R 23.536 -
Fh‐R 5.337 Fh‐R -3.844

.
TD
Flogitudnal 8.150 Flogitudnal 19.692
Contraction Case Contraction Case
 0.03 0.05  0.03 0.05
Fh/2+R 10.500 Fh/2+R 16.490 -
Fh/2+R 15.111 Fh/2+R 9.252
Flogitudnal 25.612 Flogitudnal 25.742

No Live load Case Span Dislodge Case


Expansion Case Expansion Case
S11 S22 S33 S11 S22 S33
Reaction 0 0 0 Reaction 0 0 0
Rg 165.34 Rg 82.67
Fh 0.00 0.00 Fh 0.00 0.00
 0.05 0.03  0.05 0.03
Fh‐R -8.267 - Fh‐R -4.134 -
Fh‐R -4.960 Fh‐R -2.480
Flogitudnal -13.227 Flogitudnal -6.614
Contraction Case Contraction Case
 0.03 0.05  0.03 0.05
Fh/2+R 4.960 - Fh/2+R 2.480 -
Fh/2+R 8.267 Fh/2+R 4.134
Flogitudnal 13.227 Flogitudnal 6.614

Page 18 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Lever arm from Moment in about


Fh
Summery of Live load Longitudinal forces pile cap bottom transverse axis MTT
Tonne m

A) Maximum Reaction case 25.74 8.65 222.67

B) Maximum moment case 25.61 8.65 221.54

.
TD
C) No Live load condition 13.23 8.65 114.42

D) Left span dislodge condition 6.61 8.65 57.21

Page 19 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

SEISMIC FORCE CALCULATION:


Time Period Calculation T = 2 D
1000 F
D = Approximate DL of super-structure & LL in T (DL+20% LL)
= 120.00 43.10
= 163.10 T

F = Horizontal force in T required to be applied at the center of mass of


superstructure for 1 mm deflection at the top of pier / abutment for the
earthquake in the transverse direction; and the force to be applied at the top of the

.
bearings for the earthquake in the longitudinal direction.

TD
Diagram showing location of F and measured deflection:

Superstructure cg F (Transverse Seismic)


0.32
Bearing Top F (Longitudinal Seismic)
0.50
Top of abut/ pier cap

1 mm deflection
6.65
Shaft Bottom/ Point of fixity

F = 6EI for 1 mm deflection at x


2
x *(3L-x)

Basic Data:
Modulus of Elasticity E 32308.2 Mpa

Diameter of Pier D 1.5 m


Height of deflection point from bottom x 6.65 m

Seismic Zone Data:


Seismic Zone zone IV
Zone factor Z 0.24
Importance Factor I 1.5
Type of soil soil.type medium
Response Reduction Factor Long R.L 3
Trans R.T 3

Page 20 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Table for calculation of Seismic Coefficient in Longitudinal, Transverse and Vertical direction

Longitudinal Transvere Vertical


Description Abbr. Unit
Naming Value Naming Value Naming Value

Dead Load DL T 120.0 120.0


Live Load LL T 0.0 43.1
Total Load D T D.L 120.0 D.T 163.1

Second moment of area I m


4 IL 0.25 IT 0.25

.
Length upto load point L m L.L 7.15 L.T 7.47

TD
Horizontal force F T F.L 7.36 F.T 6.91

Time Period T sec T.L 0.255 T.T 0.307


Sa/g Sa/g.L 2.500 Sa/g.T 2.500

Seismic Coefficient Ah Ah.L 0.150 Ah.T 0.150 Av 0.100

Seismic Coefficient, sub Ah.L.sub 0.150 Ah.T.sub 0.150 Av.sub 0.100

Seismic Coefficient, fdn Ah.L.fdn 0.203 Ah.T.fdn 0.203 Av.fdn 0.135


35% extra

Design Horizontal Longitudinal seismic coeff., AhL = Ah'/R(Long.) = 0.150


Design Horizontal Transverse seismic coeff., AhT = Ah'/R(Trans.) = 0.150
Design Vertical Seismic Coefficient - Av= Av'/R(vert.) = 0.100

For Design of Foundations Seismic Forces are increased by 35%


Design Horizontal Longitudinal seismic coeff., AhL = Ah'/R(Long.) = 0.203
Design Horizontal Transverse seismic coeff., AhT = Ah'/R(Trans.) = 0.203
Design Vertical Seismic Coefficient - Av= Av'/R(vert.) = 0.135

Page 21 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

SEISMIC COMPONENT OF SUPER-STRUCTURE DL & Snow load


Longitudinal Horizontal seismic coefficent AhL = 0.203
Transverse Horizontal seismic coefficent AhT = 0.203
Vertical seismic coefficent AV = 0.135

Forces @ Pile cap bottom & Their Lever arm from pile cap bottom
Left span Right span
Description W ey W ey
Tonne m Tonne m

.
Total Super-Structure DL = 120.0 8.974 120.0 8.974

TD
Total Super-Structure Snow load = 45.3 9.797 45.3 9.797
Total Surfacing weight = 0.0 9.322 0.0 9.322

Total 165.3 9.2 165.3 9.2


W = Weight of super-structure
ey = Cg. above base slab in vertical direction

Distance From Pile cap bottom to bearing top = 8.65 m

SEISMIC LONGITUDINAL :
Longitudinal seismic coefficent AhL = 0.2025

Left span Right span


Total weight of sup DL, Snow load & surfacing = 165.3 Tonne 165.3 Tonne
Seismic Component HL = 0 Tonne 33.5 Tonne
Lever arm above base slab = 0m 8.7 m
Moment about T-T axis MTT = 0 Tm 289.6 Tm

SEISMIC TRANSVERSE :
Horizontal seismic coefficent AhT = 0.203

Left span Right span


Total weight of sup DL, Snow load & surfacing = 82.7 Tonne 82.7 Tonne
Seismic Component HT = 16.7 Tonne 16.7 Tonne
Lever arm above base slab = 9.2 m 9.2 m
Moment about LL axis MLL = 154.0 Tm 154.0 Tm

Page 22 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

SEISMIC VERTICAL :
Reaction due to DL, Snow load & Surfacing @ Pile cap bottom
Left span Right span
Description V MTT MLL V MTT MLL
Tonne Tm Tm Tonne Tm Tm
Total Super-Structure DL = 60.0 0.0 0.0 60.0 0.0 0.0
Total Super-Structure Snow load = 22.7 4.1 0.0 22.7 4.1 0.0
Total Surfacing weight = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Total 82.7 4.1 0.0 82.7 4.1 0.0

.
TD
Horizontal seismic coefficent Av = 0.135
Total weight of sup DL, Snow load & surfacing = 165.3 Tonne

Forces at Pier Left span Right span


Seismic Component = 11.2 Tonne 11.2 Tonne
MLL = 0.0 Tm 0.0 Tm
MTT = 0.6 Tm 0.6 Tm

Summary of Permanent Load (DL+Snow load+SURFACING) seismic Component :


Left span
At Fixed End, Force about V HL HT ey MTT MLL
toe T T T m Tm Tm
Seismic Longitudinal 0.0 0.0 0.0

Seismic Transverse 16.7 9.2 154.0

Seismic Vertical 11.2 0.6 0.0

Right span
At Fixed End, Force about V HL HT ey MTT MLL
toe T T T m Tm Tm
Seismic Longitudinal 33.5 8.7 289.6

Seismic Transverse 16.7 9.2 154.0

Seismic Vertical 11.2 0.6 0.0

Page 23 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

SEISMIC COMPONENT OF LIVE LOAD

.
TD
Longitudinal Horizontal seismic coefficent AhL = 0.203
Transverse Horizontal seismic coefficent AhT = 0.203
Vertical seismic coefficent AV = 0.135

Live load Reaction & Their Lever arm from Pile cap bottom
Max Reaction case Left span Right span
Description W MTT MLL ey W MTT MLL ey
Tonne Tm Tm m Tonne Tm Tm m
Max Reaction case = 96.3 0.0 -117.5 10.5 103.3 0.0 -126.1 10.5

Max Moment case = 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.5 189.4 0.0 -231.1 10.5

W = Live Load Reaction


ey = Cg. above base slab in vertical direction

SEISMIC LONGITUDINAL :
No Live Load seismic component is considered in longitudinal direction
* 20% of braking force is considered

Fh = 41.79 x 0.2
= 8.36 Tonne

Lever arm from bottom of pile cap = 8.65 m


Moment about TT axis MTT = 72.291 Tm

SEISMIC TRANSVERSE :
Horizontal seismic coefficent AhT = 0.203

Page 24 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Left span Right span

.
Max Live Load Reaction Case :

TD
Maximum Live Load reaction = 96.33 Tonne 103.34 Tonne
Seismic Component HT = 3.90 Tonne 4.19 Tonne
Lever arm above base slab = 10.50 m 10.50 m
Moment about LL axis MLL = 40.95 Tm 43.93 Tm

Max Llong Moment Case : Left span Right span


Maximum Live Load reaction = 0.00 Tonne 189.41 Tonne
Seismic Component HT = 0.00 Tonne 7.67 Tonne
Lever arm above base slab = 10.50 m 10.50 m
Moment about LL axis MLL = 0.00 Tm 80.53 Tm

SEISMIC VERTICAL :
Vertical seismic coefficent AhT = 0.135

Max Live Load Reaction Case : Left span Right span


Maximum Live Load reaction = 96.33 Tonne 103.34 Tonne
Seismic Component = 13.00 Tonne 13.95 Tonne
MLL = -15.87 Tm -17.02 Tm
MTT = 0.00 Tm 0.00 Tm

Max Long. Moment Case : Left span Right span


Maximum Live Load reaction = 0.00 Tonne 189.41 Tonne
Seismic Component = 0.00 Tonne 25.57 Tonne
MLL = 0.00 Tm -31.20 Tm
MTT = 0.00 Tm 0.00 Tm

Page 25 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Summary of LL seismic component transferred from super-structure :

.
Max Live Load Reaction Case :

TD
Left span Right span
At Fixed/ Free End V HL HT ey MTT MLL V HL HT ey MTT MLL
T T T m Tm Tm T T T m Tm Tm
Seismic Longitudinal 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.4 8.7 72.3

Seismic Transverse 3.9 10.50 41.0 4.2 10.50 43.9

Seismic Vertical 13.00 0.0 -15.87 13.95 0.0 -17.02

Max Long Moment Case :


Left span Right span
At Fixed/ Free End V HL HT ey MTT MLL V HL HT ey MTT MLL
T T T m Tm Tm T T T m Tm Tm
Seismic Longitudinal 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.4 8.7 72.3

Seismic Transverse 0.0 10.50 0.0 7.7 10.50 80.5

Seismic Vertical 0.00 0.0 0.00 25.57 0.0 -31.20

Page 26 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Calculation of Longitudinal Forces


Horizontal force at bearing level in the longitudinal direction at fixed bearing (other than elastomeric bearing)
i) Fh -  (Rg +Rq) Refer Clause 211.5 IRC: 6-2010
= Maximum of
ii) Fh / 2 +  (Rg + Rq)
Where
Fh = Applied Horizontal force
Rg = Reaction at free end due to dead load and Snow load
Rq = Reaction at free end due to live load load
 = Coefficent of Friction at movable bearing = 0.03 or 0.05 which ever

.
TD
govern
* Fh (breaking force) is considered 20 % of the first train load + 10 % of the load of the succeeding trains or
part thereof.

Reaction due to dead load and Snow load at free end of left & right span
Load description Left span Right span
Tonne Tonne
DL 60.00 60.00
Snow load 22.67 22.67
Surfacing 0.00 0.00

Rg 82.67 82.67

Live load reaction


Live load Load case R11 R22 R33
1) Maximum Reaction case 9 200 7
2) Maximum Moment case 0 189 26

Page 27 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Maximum Moment Case Maximum Reaction Case


Expansion Case Expansion Case
S11 S22 S33 S11 S22 S33
Reaction 0 189 26 Reaction 9 200 7
Rg 165.34 Rg 165.34
Fh 0.00 2.22 Fh 8.36 0.26
 0.05 0.03  0.05 0.03
R 8.267 - R 18.251 -
Fh‐R -3.527 Fh‐R -4.895

.
Flogitudnal 4.740 Flogitudnal 13.356

TD
Contraction Case Contraction Case
 0.03 0.05  0.03 0.05
R -4.960 - R -10.950 -
Fh/2+R 10.679 Fh/2+R 8.727
Flogitudnal 5.719 Flogitudnal -2.224

Lever arm from Moment in about


Fh
Summery of Live load Longitudinal forces pile cap bottom transverse axis MTT
Tonne m

A) Maximum Reaction case 13.36 8.65 115.53

B) Maximum moment case 5.72 8.65 49.47

Page 28 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

SEISMIC COMPONENT OF SUB-STRUCTURE


Longitudinal Horizontal seismic coefficent AhL = 0.203
Transverse Horizontal seismic coefficent AhT = 0.203
Vertical seismic coefficent AV = 0.135

Sub-structure Vertical load


Description W eY eL eT
Tonne m m m
Sub-structure = 167.6 5.5 0.00 0.00
Pile cap = 240.0 0.8 0.00 0.00

.
TD
Total 407.6 2.7 0.00 0.00
W = Weight of super-structure
ey = Cg. above base slab in vertical direction

SEISMIC LONGITUDINAL : Sub-Structure


Longitudinal seismic coefficent AhL = 0.203
Total weight of Sub-structure = 407.6 T

Seismic Component HL = 82.5 T


Lever arm above base slab = 2.7 m
Moment about T-T axis MTT = 222.7 Tm

SEISMIC TRANSVERSE :
Horizontal seismic coefficent AhT = 0.203
Total weight of Sub-structure = 407.6 T

Seismic Component HT = 82.5 T


Lever arm above base slab = 2.7 m
Moment about LL axis MLL = 222.7 Tm

SEISMIC VERTICAL :
Horizontal seismic coefficent Av = 0.135
Total weight of Sub-structure = 407.6 Tonne

Seismic Component = 55.0 Tonne


Lever arm along LL axis = 0.00 m
Lever arm along TT axis = 0.00 m

Moment about LL axis MLL = 0.01 Tm


Moment about TT axis MTT = 0.00 Tm

Summery of Sub-structure seismic component :


At Fixed End V HL HT MTT MLL
T T T Tm Tm
Seismic Longitudinal 82.5 222.7

Seismic Transverse 82.5 222.7

Seismic Vertical 55.0 0.0 0.0

Page 29 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Effect of Wind Force


Basic wind speed at Loaction 66 m/s
Basic wind speed as per TABLE 4 IRC 6-2014 33 m/s

Overall length of span 1 43.417 m


Overall length of span 2 43.282 m
Deck width of super structure 2.75 m
Height of super structure 0.647 m
Exposed area of Super structure A1 239.27 m2

.
Exposed area of Super structure A3 119.0 m2

TD
Drag co efficient for Super structure CD 1.95
Drag co efficient for live load Super structure CD 1.2
Gust Factor G 2
Lift coefficient CL 0.75

2 2
Basic Wind Pressure @ Bridge Location 66 m/s = 4.000
Wind pressure= Ratio Basic wind speed as per TABLE 4 IRC 6-2014 33 m/s
Due to Dead load of Super structure
Horizpntal wind pressure P 80.9 Kg/m2 ( IRC:6 - 2014,Page 31)
Transverse force PZ X A1 x G x CD 75.5 T
Longitudinal force 25% FT 18.9 T
Verticle force PZ X A3 x G x CL 14.5 T

Due to Live load on Super structure


Length of Class A train of vehicles 20.3 (IRC 6-2014, Cl.204.1.3, Page 10)
Length of 70R vehicle 14.92 (IRC 6-2014, Cl.201.2, Page 58)
Ht of the Vehicle to be considered 3 (IRC 6-2014, Cl.209.3.6, Page 32)
Area of Vehicle A1 44.76 m2
Transverse force PZ X A1 x G x CD 8.7 T
Longitudinal force 25% FT 2.2 T

Wind force on Pier

1.5

5.25

Height of pier 6.7 m
Exposed Area of sub structure in T‐Dirn 10.0 m2
Exposed Area of sub structure in L‐Dir n 34.9 m2
Drag co efficient for Sub structure CD 0.9
Transverse force PZ X A1 x G x CD 1.5 T

Page 30 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Summery of wind forces

V HL HT ey MTT MLL
At Fixed End, Force about toe
T T T m Tm Tm
Super structure 14.5 18.9 75.53 6.7 125.6 502.3

Live load 2.17 8.7 6.7 14.5 57.8

Sub structure 1.5 6.7 9.7

.
TD

Page 31 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Water current forces :


Water current pressure P = 52KV2 kg/m2

Component Type Dimension K Value


Trans Long. Long. dirn Trans. dirn
Pier Circ 5.25 1.5 0.66 0.66
Pile cap Rect 8 8 1.5 1.5
Pile Rect 7.7 7.7 1.5 1.5

.
TD
Mean velocity of current = 2.5 m/s
Surface water velocity = √2 x 2.5
= 3.54 m/sec

Pressure at HFL Level = 52 k V2


= 650 *k kg/m2
= 0.65 *k tonne/m2

HFL 4378.1 0.650 k

Pier bottom shaft 4375.5 0.412 k

Pile cap bottom 4374.0 0.274 k

Deepest scour level 4371.0


Pressure diagram

Founding Level 4354.0 m

Page 32 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Forces Up to Pile cap bottom:


o
Variation in water current direction = 20
Total force Forces in
In Trans Long Trans
*/ Forces over pier shaft
Pressure intensity at HFL T/m2 0.429 0.147 0.403
Pressure intensity at Pier shaft bottom T/m2 0.272 0.093 0.255

Obstracted area m2 3.909 13.6815 3.909


Total Force up to pier shaft bottom T 1.369 1.639 1.287

.
TD
Lever arm above pile cap bottom m 2.901 2.901 2.901

*/ Forces over pile cap


Pressure intensity at Pier shaft bottom T/m2 0.617 0.211 0.580
Pressure intensity at pile cap bottom T/m2 0.412 0.141 0.387

Obstracted area m2 12 12 12
Total Force up to pier shaft bottom T 6.174 2.112 5.802
Lever arm above pile cap bottom m 0.800 0.800 0.800

Total force at pile cap bottom T 7.544 3.751 7.089


Moment at pile cap ottom Tm 8.912 6.444 8.374

Water current forces below pile cap bottom


Total force Forces in
In Trans Long Trans
*/ Forces over pile
Pressure intensity at pile cap bottom T/m2 0.412 0.141 0.387
Pressure intensity at MSL T/m2 0 0 0

Obstracted area m2 23.1 23.1 23.1


Total Force up to pier shaft bottom T 4.754 1.626 4.468
Lever arm above pile cap bottom m 2.000 2.000 2.000

Page 33 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Forces Up to Pile cap Top:


o
Variation in water current direction = 20
Total force Forces in
In Trans Long Trans
*/ Forces over pier shaft
Pressure intensity at HFL T/m2 0.429 0.147 0.403
Pressure intensity at Pier shaft bottom T/m2 0.272 0.093 0.255

Obstracted area m2 3.909 13.6815 3.909


Total Force up to pier shaft bottom T 1.369 1.639 1.287

.
TD
Lever arm above Pier shaft bottom m 2.901 2.901 2.901

Total force at pile cap bottom T 1.369 1.639 1.287


Moment at pile cap ottom Tm 3.972 4.755 3.733

Page 34 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Calculation of Hydrodynamic forces

Dimension Enveloping Weight eq.


HFL 4378.1 L T cylender dia Height Volume water
m m m m m3 T

5.25 1.5 5.25 2.6 56.4 56.4

Pier bottom shaft 4375.5

.
TD
8 8 8 1.5 75.4 75.4
Pile cap bottom 4374.0

Deepest scour level 4371.0 7.7 7.7 7.7 3.0 139.7 139.7

Founding Level 4354.0 Total 271.51 271.51

Total height = 7.1 m


Eq. radius = 3.487 m
H/r = 2.038
Ce = 0.5788

Total Force F = Ce * h *W

Forces up to Pile cap bottom


Seismic Longitudinal
h = 0.203
F = 31.821 Tonne
Levera arm above scour level = 3.046 m

Horizontal force up to Pile cap bottom


C1 = h1/H = 0.6

Total force = C3 F
C3 = 0.495
Force up to pile cap bottom = 15.746
Lever arm above scour level = C4H
C4 = 0.6513
Lever arm above scour level = 4.628202 m
Lever arm above pile cap bottom = 1.6 m
Moment at pile cap bottom = 25.63741 tm

Horizontal force below Pile cap bottom = 27.193 Tonne

Page 35 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Seismic Transvers
h = 0.203
F = 31.821 Tonne
Levera arm above scour level = 3.046 m

Horizontal force up to Pile cap bottom


C1 = h1/H = 0.6

.
TD
Total force = C3 F
C3 = 0.495
Force up to pile cap bottom = 15.746
Lever arm above scour level = C4H
C4 = 0.6513
Lever arm above scour level = 4.628202 m
Lever arm above pile cap bottom = 1.6 m
Moment at pile cap bottom = 25.63741 tm

Horizontal force below Pile cap bottom = 27.193 Tonne

Forces up to Pier shaft bottom


Seismic Longitudinal
h = 0.2025
F = 31.821 Tonne
Lever arm above scour level = 3.046 m

Height up to Pier shaft bottom = 2.6 m

Horizontal force up to Pier shaft bottom


C1 = h1/H = 0.4

Total force = C3 F
C3 = 0.254
Force up to pier shaft bottom = 8.085
Lever arm above scour level = C4H
C4 = 0.771
Lever arm above scour level = 5.479 m
Lever arm above pier shaft bottom = 0.979 m
Moment at pier shaft bottom = 7.916 tm

Page 36 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Seismic Transvers
h = 0.203
F = 31.821 Tonne
Levera arm above scour level = 3.046 m

Height up to Pier shaft bottom = 2.6 m

Horizontal force up to Pier shaft bottom


C1 = h1/H = 0.4

.
TD
Total force = C3 F
C3 = 0.254
Force up to pier shaft bottom = 8.085
Lever arm above scour level = C4H
C4 = 0.7711
Lever arm above scour level = 5.479162 m
Lever arm above pile cap bottom = 1.0 m
Moment at pier shaft bottom = 7.916196 tm

Page 37 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

FINDING OUT MAXIMUM & MINIMUM REACTION OVER PILE :

.
Pile Coordinates Pile Coordinates Pile Coordinates Pile Coordinates Pile Coordinates

TD
S.N. L T S.N. L T S.N. L T S.N. L T S.N. L T
1 -3.00 -3.00 13 -2.00 2.00 25 0.00 0.00 37 2.00 -2.00 49 3.00 3.00
N = 49 Nos. 2 -3.00 -2.00 14 -2.00 3.00 26 0.00 1.00 38 2.00 -1.00
3 -3.00 -1.00 15 -1.00 -3.00 27 0.00 2.00 39 2.00 0.00
4 -3.00 0.00 16 -1.00 -2.00 28 0.00 3.00 40 2.00 1.00
5 -3.00 1.00 17 -1.00 -1.00 29 1.00 -3.00 41 2.00 2.00
1X7 6 -3.00 2.00 18 -1.00 0.00 30 1.00 -2.00 42 2.00 3.00
1 1 7 -3.00 3.00 19 -1.00 1.00 31 1.00 -1.00 43 3.00 -3.00
8 -2.00 -3.00 20 -1.00 2.00 32 1.00 0.00 44 3.00 -2.00
1 9 -2.00 -2.00 21 -1.00 3.00 33 1.00 1.00 45 3.00 -1.00
1 10 -2.00 -1.00 22 0.00 -3.00 34 1.00 2.00 46 3.00 0.00
11 -2.00 0.00 23 0.00 -2.00 35 1.00 3.00 47 3.00 1.00
T 1 12 -2.00 1.00 24 0.00 -1 36 2 -3.00 48 3.00 2.00
 r2 193.00 181.00
L 1
1 8 LWL Condition Non-Seismic Seismic Case wind case
Maximum Reaction Over Pile = 19.2 Tonne 21.3 Tonne 19.7
1 Minimum Reaction Over Pile = 3.5 Tonne -6.1 Tonne -9.6
Maximum Horizontal Force/ Pile = 0.5 Tonne 2.7 Tonne 2.4
1
1
Pile capacity = 50 Tonne OK [Seismic]
8

HFL Condition Non-Seismic Seismic Case wind case


Maximum Reaction Over Pile = 20.7 Tonne 23.7 Tonne 19.7
Minimum Reaction Over Pile = 5.3 Tonne -5.3 Tonne -9.6
Maximum Horizontal Force/ Pile = 0.6 Tonne 3.2 Tonne 2.4

Pile capacity = 50 Tonne OK [Seismic]

Note :
1.Reaction per pile is less than the vertical capacity of the pile hence safe.

2. Horizontal capacity is governing the design and considering the fixity of the piles the horizontal
capacity can be considered as 1.25*2.5*1.25 = 3.91. Hence safe in horizontal loading

Page 38 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

MAXIMUM & MINIMUM REACTION OVER PILE


SUMMERY OF FORCES :

.
TD
S.N. Description Forces @ cg. Of pile cap bottom Pile Reaction over Pile No.
V HL HT MTT MLL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Tonne Tonne Tonne Tm Tm Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne
LC-1 NS LWL Span dislodge case 283.07 6.6136 0 61.2882 0.06891 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1
LC-2 NS LWL No Live load 365.74 13.2272 0 122.576 0.06891 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2
LC-3 NS LWL With LL max reaction case 565.411 25.7421 0 230.83 -243.529 12.0 10.6 9.3 8.0 6.6 5.3 3.9 13.2 11.8 10.5 9.1 7.8
LC-4 NS LWL With LL max moment case 535.907 25.6115 0 229.701 -231.016 11.2 9.9 8.6 7.4 6.1 4.8 3.5 12.4 11.1 9.8 8.6 7.3

LC-5 LC-1 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 (50% 273.143 64.6191 14.8905 317.366 56.5741 -0.3 0.0 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.3 1.6 1.3 1.7 2.0 2.3 2.6
LC-6 LC-1 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 (50% 273.143 24.0152 49.6352 138.054 188.423 0.3 1.3 2.4 3.4 4.5 5.5 6.6 1.0 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.2
LC-7 LC-1 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 (50% 292.997 64.6191 14.8905 317.532 56.5769 0.1 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.4 1.7 2.0 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0
LC-8 LC-1 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 (50% 292.997 24.0152 49.6352 138.219 188.426 0.7 1.7 2.8 3.8 4.9 5.9 7.0 1.4 2.5 3.5 4.5 5.6

LC-9 LC-2 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 342.538 129.238 34.8033 634.568 159.28 -5.5 -4.6 -3.8 -2.9 -2.0 -1.1 -0.2 -2.2 -1.3 -0.5 0.4 1.3
LC-10 LC-2 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 342.538 48.0305 116.011 275.942 530.78 -6.1 -3.2 -0.2 2.7 5.6 8.6 11.5 -4.7 -1.7 1.2 4.1 7.1
LC-11 LC-2 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 388.943 129.238 34.8033 635.229 159.286 -4.6 -3.7 -2.8 -1.9 -1.1 -0.2 0.7 -1.3 -0.4 0.5 1.4 2.2
LC-12 LC-2 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 388.943 48.0305 116.011 276.604 530.785 -5.2 -2.2 0.7 3.6 6.6 9.5 12.4 -3.7 -0.8 2.1 5.1 8.0

LC-13 LC-3 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 380.855 129.367 35.2885 635.681 117.627 -4.1 -3.4 -2.8 -2.1 -1.5 -0.8 -0.2 -0.8 -0.1 0.5 1.2 1.8
LC-14 LC-3 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 380.855 48.1593 117.628 277.056 501.011 -4.8 -2.1 0.7 3.5 6.2 9.0 11.8 -3.4 -0.6 2.1 4.9 7.7
LC-15 LC-3 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 430.494 129.367 35.2885 636.342 113.686 -3.0 -2.4 -1.7 -1.1 -0.5 0.2 0.8 0.3 0.9 1.6 2.2 2.8
LC-16 LC-3 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 430.494 48.1593 117.628 277.717 497.07 -3.8 -1.0 1.7 4.5 7.2 10.0 12.7 -2.3 0.4 3.2 5.9 8.7

LC-17 LC-4 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 359.64 121.73 35.2636 569.623 119.767 -3.5 -2.8 -2.2 -1.5 -0.9 -0.2 0.5 -0.5 0.1 0.8 1.4 2.1
LC-18 LC-4 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 359.64 40.5224 117.545 210.998 502.54 -4.3 -1.5 1.3 4.1 6.8 9.6 12.4 -3.2 -0.4 2.4 5.2 7.9
LC-19 LC-4 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 409.113 121.73 35.2636 570.284 116.029 -2.4 -1.8 -1.2 -0.5 0.1 0.8 1.4 0.5 1.2 1.8 2.4 3.1
LC-20 LC-4 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 409.113 40.5224 117.545 211.659 498.802 -3.2 -0.5 2.3 5.1 7.8 10.6 13.3 -2.1 0.6 3.4 6.2 8.9

LC-21 NS HFL Span dislodge case 359.207 10.3647 7.08887 67.7326 8.44312 6.1 6.2 6.2 6.3 6.3 6.4 6.4 6.5 6.5 6.6 6.6 6.7
LC-22 NS HFL No Live load 441.877 16.9783 7.08887 129.021 8.44312 6.9 6.9 7.0 7.0 7.1 7.1 7.2 7.5 7.6 7.6 7.7 7.7
LC-23 NS HFL With LL max reaction case 641.547 29.4932 7.08887 237.275 -235.154 13.3 12.0 10.7 9.4 8.1 6.8 5.5 14.5 13.2 11.9 10.6 9.3
LC-24 NS HFL With LL max moment case 621.668 29.3626 7.08887 236.145 -222.642 12.7 11.5 10.2 9.0 7.8 6.6 5.3 13.9 12.7 11.5 10.2 9.0

Page 39 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

LC-25 LC-21 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 (50 349.28 76.2431 24.3413 336.63 68.794 0.8 1.1 1.5 1.9 2.3 2.7 3.0 2.5 2.9 3.3 3.6 4.0
LC-26 LC-21 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 (50 349.28 30.1282 64.597 148.344 209.616 1.3 2.5 3.7 4.8 6.0 7.1 8.3 2.1 3.3 4.4 5.6 6.7

.
LC-27 LC-21 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 (50% 369.134 76.2431 24.3413 336.795 68.7968 1.2 1.5 1.9 2.3 2.7 3.1 3.4 2.9 3.3 3.7 4.0 4.4

TD
LC-28 LC-21 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 (50% 369.134 30.1282 64.597 148.509 209.619 1.8 2.9 4.1 5.2 6.4 7.5 8.7 2.5 3.7 4.8 6.0 7.2

LC-29 LC-22 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 418.675 148.735 46.6159 666.649 175.346 -4.7 -3.8 -2.8 -1.8 -0.8 0.1 1.1 -1.3 -0.3 0.7 1.6 2.6
LC-30 LC-22 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 418.675 56.5053 138.846 290.078 564.791 -5.3 -2.2 0.9 4.0 7.2 10.3 13.4 -3.8 -0.7 2.4 5.5 8.7
LC-31 LC-22 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 465.08 148.735 46.6159 667.31 175.351 -3.8 -2.8 -1.9 -0.9 0.1 1.1 2.0 -0.3 0.6 1.6 2.6 3.5
LC-32 LC-22 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 465.08 56.5053 138.846 290.739 564.797 -4.4 -1.3 1.9 5.0 8.1 11.2 14.3 -2.9 0.2 3.4 6.5 9.6

LC-33 LC-23 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 456.992 148.864 47.1011 667.763 133.692 -3.3 -2.5 -1.8 -1.1 -0.3 0.4 1.2 0.2 0.9 1.7 2.4 3.1
LC-34 LC-23 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 456.992 56.6341 140.463 291.192 535.022 -4.1 -1.1 1.8 4.8 7.8 10.7 13.7 -2.6 0.4 3.4 6.3 9.3
LC-35 LC-23 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 506.631 148.864 47.1011 668.424 129.752 -2.2 -1.5 -0.8 -0.1 0.7 1.4 2.1 1.3 2.0 2.7 3.4 4.1
LC-36 LC-23 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 506.631 56.6341 140.463 291.853 531.081 -3.0 -0.1 2.9 5.8 8.7 11.7 14.6 -1.5 1.4 4.4 7.3 10.2

LC-37 LC-24 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 455.024 141.227 42.3524 601.704 128.141 -2.2 -1.5 -0.8 -0.1 0.6 1.3 2.1 0.9 1.6 2.3 3.1 3.8
LC-38 LC-24 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 455.024 48.9973 124.634 225.133 510.914 -2.7 0.1 3.0 5.8 8.6 11.4 14.3 -1.5 1.3 4.1 7.0 9.8
LC-39 LC-24 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 504.497 141.227 42.3524 602.366 124.403 -1.1 -0.4 0.2 0.9 1.6 2.3 3.0 2.0 2.7 3.4 4.1 4.7
LC-40 LC-24 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 504.497 48.9973 124.634 225.794 507.176 -1.6 1.2 4.0 6.8 9.6 12.4 15.2 -0.5 2.4 5.2 8.0 10.8

LC-41 NS LWL Span dislodge case+wind load 216.514 24.8066 100.308 150.544 17.3548 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0
LC-42 NS LWL No Live load+wind load 299.184 24.8066 100.308 154.625 17.3548 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.0 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6
LC-43 NS LWL With LL max reaction case+wind 245.815 85.4733 57.4703 700.447 -226.243 -2.1 -3.4 -4.6 -5.9 -7.1 -8.4 -9.6 1.5 0.3 -1.0 -2.2 -3.5
LC-44 NS LWL With LL max reaction succeding 299.265 60.4038 100.308 462.541 -104.444 0.6 0.1 -0.5 -1.1 -1.7 -2.2 -2.8 3.0 2.5 1.9 1.3 0.7
LC-45 NS HFL Span dislodge case+wind load 216.514 24.8066 100.308 150.544 17.3548 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0
LC-46 NS HFL No Live load+wind load 299.184 24.8066 100.308 154.625 17.3548 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.0 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6
LC-47 NS HFL With LL max reaction case+wind 245.815 85.4733 57.4703 700.447 -226.243 -2.1 -3.4 -4.6 -5.9 -7.1 -8.4 -9.6 1.5 0.3 -1.0 -2.2 -3.5
LC-48 NS HFL With LL max reaction succeding+ 278.081 60.4038 100.308 462.541 -104.444 0.2 -0.4 -0.9 -1.5 -2.1 -2.7 -3.2 2.6 2.0 1.5 0.9 0.3

Page 40 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

.
TD
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne
5.1 5.1 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1
6.2 6.2 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.1
6.5 5.1 14.4 13.0 11.7 10.3 9.0 7.7 6.3 15.6 14.2 12.9 11.5 10.2 8.8 7.5 16.8 15.4 14.1 12.7 11.4 10.0
6.0 4.7 13.6 12.3 11.0 9.7 8.5 7.2 5.9 14.8 13.5 12.2 10.9 9.7 8.4 7.1 16.0 14.7 13.4 12.1 10.9 9.6

2.9 3.2 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2 4.6 4.9 4.6 4.9 5.3 5.6 5.9 6.2 6.5 6.3 6.6 6.9 7.2 7.5 7.8
6.2 7.3 1.7 2.8 3.8 4.9 5.9 6.9 8.0 2.5 3.5 4.5 5.6 6.6 7.7 8.7 3.2 4.2 5.2 6.3 7.3 8.4
3.3 3.6 3.4 3.7 4.0 4.3 4.6 5.0 5.3 5.0 5.4 5.7 6.0 6.3 6.6 6.9 6.7 7.0 7.3 7.6 7.9 8.2
6.6 7.7 2.1 3.2 4.2 5.3 6.3 7.3 8.4 2.9 3.9 4.9 6.0 7.0 8.1 9.1 3.6 4.6 5.7 6.7 7.7 8.8

2.2 3.1 1.1 1.9 2.8 3.7 4.6 5.5 6.3 4.4 5.2 6.1 7.0 7.9 8.8 9.6 7.6 8.5 9.4 10.3 11.2 12.0
10.0 12.9 -3.2 -0.3 2.6 5.6 8.5 11.4 14.4 -1.8 1.1 4.1 7.0 9.9 12.9 15.8 -0.4 2.6 5.5 8.4 11.4 14.3
3.1 4.0 2.0 2.9 3.8 4.6 5.5 6.4 7.3 5.3 6.2 7.1 7.9 8.8 9.7 10.6 8.6 9.5 10.3 11.2 12.1 13.0
10.9 13.9 -2.3 0.6 3.6 6.5 9.4 12.4 15.3 -0.9 2.1 5.0 7.9 10.9 13.8 16.7 0.6 3.5 6.4 9.4 12.3 15.2

2.5 3.1 2.5 3.2 3.8 4.5 5.1 5.8 6.4 5.8 6.5 7.1 7.8 8.4 9.1 9.7 9.1 9.8 10.4 11.1 11.7 12.4
10.4 13.2 -2.0 0.8 3.6 6.3 9.1 11.9 14.6 -0.5 2.2 5.0 7.8 10.5 13.3 16.1 0.9 3.7 6.4 9.2 12.0 14.7
3.4 4.1 3.6 4.2 4.9 5.5 6.1 6.7 7.4 6.9 7.5 8.2 8.8 9.4 10.0 10.7 10.2 10.8 11.5 12.1 12.7 13.3
11.4 14.1 -0.9 1.9 4.6 7.3 10.1 12.8 15.6 0.5 3.3 6.0 8.8 11.5 14.3 17.0 2.0 4.7 7.5 10.2 13.0 15.7

2.8 3.4 2.4 3.1 3.7 4.4 5.0 5.7 6.4 5.4 6.0 6.7 7.3 8.0 8.7 9.3 8.3 9.0 9.6 10.3 11.0 11.6
10.7 13.5 -2.1 0.7 3.5 6.2 9.0 11.8 14.6 -1.0 1.8 4.6 7.3 10.1 12.9 15.7 0.1 2.9 5.7 8.4 11.2 14.0
3.7 4.4 3.5 4.1 4.8 5.4 6.0 6.7 7.3 6.4 7.1 7.7 8.3 9.0 9.6 10.3 9.4 10.0 10.7 11.3 11.9 12.6
11.7 14.4 -1.0 1.7 4.5 7.3 10.0 12.8 15.5 0.1 2.8 5.6 8.3 11.1 13.9 16.6 1.2 3.9 6.7 9.4 12.2 15.0

6.7 6.8 6.8 6.9 6.9 7.0 7.0 7.1 7.1 7.2 7.2 7.3 7.3 7.4 7.4 7.5 7.5 7.6 7.6 7.7 7.7 7.8
7.8 7.8 8.2 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.4 8.4 8.5 8.9 8.9 9.0 9.0 9.1 9.1 9.2 9.5 9.6 9.6 9.7 9.7 9.8
8.0 6.7 15.8 14.5 13.2 11.9 10.6 9.3 8.0 17.0 15.7 14.4 13.1 11.8 10.5 9.2 18.2 16.9 15.6 14.3 13.0 11.7
7.8 6.5 15.2 13.9 12.7 11.5 10.2 9.0 7.8 16.4 15.1 13.9 12.7 11.5 10.2 9.0 17.6 16.4 15.1 13.9 12.7 11.5

Page 41 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

4.4 4.8 4.2 4.6 5.0 5.4 5.8 6.1 6.5 6.0 6.4 6.7 7.1 7.5 7.9 8.3 7.7 8.1 8.5 8.9 9.3 9.6
7.9 9.1 2.9 4.0 5.2 6.4 7.5 8.7 9.8 3.7 4.8 6.0 7.1 8.3 9.4 10.6 4.4 5.6 6.7 7.9 9.1 10.2

.
4.8 5.2 4.6 5.0 5.4 5.8 6.2 6.5 6.9 6.4 6.8 7.2 7.5 7.9 8.3 8.7 8.1 8.5 8.9 9.3 9.7 10.0

TD
8.3 9.5 3.3 4.4 5.6 6.8 7.9 9.1 10.2 4.1 5.2 6.4 7.5 8.7 9.8 11.0 4.8 6.0 7.1 8.3 9.5 10.6

3.6 4.5 2.2 3.2 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.0 8.0 5.6 6.6 7.6 8.5 9.5 10.5 11.5 9.1 10.1 11.0 12.0 13.0 13.9
11.8 14.9 -2.3 0.8 3.9 7.0 10.2 13.3 16.4 -0.8 2.3 5.4 8.5 11.7 14.8 17.9 0.7 3.8 6.9 10.0 13.2 16.3
4.5 5.5 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.0 7.0 8.0 8.9 6.6 7.6 8.5 9.5 10.5 11.4 12.4 10.0 11.0 12.0 12.9 13.9 14.9
12.7 15.8 -1.4 1.7 4.9 8.0 11.1 14.2 17.3 0.1 3.3 6.4 9.5 12.6 15.7 18.9 1.6 4.8 7.9 11.0 14.1 17.2

3.9 4.6 3.7 4.4 5.1 5.9 6.6 7.3 8.1 7.1 7.8 8.6 9.3 10.1 10.8 11.5 10.6 11.3 12.0 12.8 13.5 14.3
12.2 15.2 -1.1 1.9 4.9 7.8 10.8 13.7 16.7 0.5 3.4 6.4 9.3 12.3 15.2 18.2 2.0 4.9 7.9 10.8 13.8 16.7
4.8 5.6 4.7 5.4 6.2 6.9 7.6 8.3 9.0 8.2 8.9 9.6 10.3 11.1 11.8 12.5 11.7 12.4 13.1 13.8 14.5 15.2
13.2 16.1 0.0 3.0 5.9 8.8 11.8 14.7 17.6 1.5 4.5 7.4 10.3 13.3 16.2 19.1 3.0 6.0 8.9 11.9 14.8 17.7

4.5 5.2 4.0 4.8 5.5 6.2 6.9 7.6 8.3 7.2 7.9 8.6 9.3 10.0 10.7 11.4 10.3 11.0 11.7 12.4 13.1 13.8
12.6 15.4 -0.3 2.5 5.3 8.1 10.9 13.8 16.6 0.8 3.6 6.5 9.3 12.1 14.9 17.8 2.0 4.8 7.6 10.5 13.3 16.1
5.4 6.1 5.1 5.8 6.5 7.2 7.9 8.5 9.2 8.2 8.9 9.6 10.3 11.0 11.7 12.4 11.4 12.0 12.7 13.4 14.1 14.8
13.6 16.4 0.7 3.5 6.3 9.1 11.9 14.7 17.5 1.9 4.7 7.5 10.3 13.1 15.9 18.7 3.1 5.9 8.7 11.5 14.3 17.1

3.1 3.1 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.9 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4
4.7 4.8 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.8 5.9 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.6 6.7 6.8 6.9 7.0 7.1
-4.7 -6.0 5.1 3.9 2.6 1.4 0.1 -1.1 -2.4 8.8 7.5 6.3 5.0 3.8 2.5 1.3 12.4 11.1 9.9 8.6 7.4 6.1
0.2 -0.4 5.4 4.9 4.3 3.7 3.1 2.6 2.0 7.8 7.3 6.7 6.1 5.5 5.0 4.4 10.2 9.7 9.1 8.5 7.9 7.3
3.1 3.1 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.9 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4
4.7 4.8 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.8 5.9 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.6 6.7 6.8 6.9 7.0 7.1
-4.7 -6.0 5.1 3.9 2.6 1.4 0.1 -1.1 -2.4 8.8 7.5 6.3 5.0 3.8 2.5 1.3 12.4 11.1 9.9 8.6 7.4 6.1
-0.3 -0.8 5.0 4.4 3.9 3.3 2.7 2.1 1.5 7.4 6.8 6.3 5.7 5.1 4.5 3.9 9.8 9.2 8.6 8.1 7.5 6.9

Page 42 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

.
TD
Resultant
horizontal
force

35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56
Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne
6.1 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 0.1
8.1 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 0.3
8.7 18.0 16.6 15.3 13.9 12.6 11.2 9.9 19.2 17.8 16.5 15.1 13.8 12.4 11.1 0.5
8.3 17.1 15.9 14.6 13.3 12.0 10.8 9.5 18.3 17.1 15.8 14.5 13.2 12.0 10.7 0.5

8.2 7.9 8.2 8.6 8.9 9.2 9.5 9.8 9.6 9.9 10.2 10.5 10.8 11.1 11.4 1.4
9.4 3.9 4.9 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.1 10.1 4.6 5.6 6.7 7.7 8.8 9.8 10.8 1.1
8.6 8.3 8.6 9.0 9.3 9.6 9.9 10.2 10.0 10.3 10.6 10.9 11.2 11.5 11.9 1.4
9.8 4.3 5.3 6.4 7.4 8.5 9.5 10.5 5.0 6.0 7.1 8.1 9.2 10.2 11.3 1.1
0.0
12.9 10.9 11.8 12.7 13.6 14.4 15.3 16.2 14.2 15.1 16.0 16.9 17.7 18.6 19.5 2.7
17.2 1.1 4.0 6.9 9.9 12.8 15.7 18.6 2.5 5.4 8.3 11.3 14.2 17.1 20.1 2.6
13.9 11.9 12.8 13.6 14.5 15.4 16.3 17.2 15.2 16.1 16.9 17.8 18.7 19.6 20.5 2.7
18.2 2.0 4.9 7.9 10.8 13.7 16.7 19.6 3.4 6.4 9.3 12.2 15.2 18.1 21.0 2.6

13.0 12.4 13.1 13.7 14.4 15.0 15.7 16.3 15.7 16.4 17.0 17.7 18.3 19.0 19.6 2.7
17.5 2.3 5.1 7.9 10.6 13.4 16.2 18.9 3.8 6.5 9.3 12.1 14.8 17.6 20.4 2.6
14.0 13.5 14.1 14.8 15.4 16.0 16.6 17.3 16.8 17.4 18.0 18.7 19.3 19.9 20.6 2.7
18.5 3.4 6.2 8.9 11.7 14.4 17.2 19.9 4.9 7.6 10.4 13.1 15.8 18.6 21.3 2.6

12.3 11.3 11.9 12.6 13.2 13.9 14.6 15.2 14.2 14.9 15.5 16.2 16.9 17.5 18.2 2.6
16.8 1.2 4.0 6.7 9.5 12.3 15.1 17.9 2.3 5.1 7.8 10.6 13.4 16.2 18.9 2.5
13.2 12.3 13.0 13.6 14.3 14.9 15.5 16.2 15.3 15.9 16.6 17.2 17.9 18.5 19.1 2.6
17.7 2.3 5.0 7.8 10.5 13.3 16.1 18.8 3.4 6.1 8.9 11.6 14.4 17.2 19.9 2.5

7.8 7.9 7.9 8.0 8.0 8.1 8.1 8.2 8.2 8.3 8.3 8.4 8.4 8.5 8.5 0.3
9.8 10.2 10.3 10.3 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.5 10.9 10.9 11.0 11.0 11.1 11.1 11.2 0.4
10.4 19.4 18.1 16.9 15.6 14.3 13.0 11.7 20.7 19.4 18.1 16.8 15.5 14.2 12.9 0.6
10.2 18.8 17.6 16.4 15.1 13.9 12.7 11.4 20.0 18.8 17.6 16.4 15.1 13.9 12.7 0.6

Page 43 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

10.0 9.5 9.9 10.2 10.6 11.0 11.4 11.8 11.2 11.6 12.0 12.4 12.7 13.1 13.5 1.6
11.4 5.2 6.3 7.5 8.7 9.8 11.0 12.1 6.0 7.1 8.3 9.4 10.6 11.8 12.9 1.5

.
10.4 9.9 10.3 10.6 11.0 11.4 11.8 12.2 11.6 12.0 12.4 12.8 13.1 13.5 13.9 1.6

TD
11.8 5.6 6.8 7.9 9.1 10.2 11.4 12.5 6.4 7.5 8.7 9.8 11.0 12.2 13.3 1.5

14.9 12.5 13.5 14.5 15.5 16.4 17.4 18.4 16.0 17.0 17.9 18.9 19.9 20.8 21.8 3.2
19.4 2.2 5.3 8.4 11.6 14.7 17.8 20.9 3.7 6.8 9.9 13.1 16.2 19.3 22.4 3.1
15.9 13.5 14.5 15.4 16.4 17.4 18.3 19.3 17.0 17.9 18.9 19.9 20.8 21.8 22.8 3.2
20.4 3.1 6.3 9.4 12.5 15.6 18.7 21.9 4.6 7.8 10.9 14.0 17.1 20.3 23.4 3.1

15.0 14.0 14.8 15.5 16.2 17.0 17.7 18.5 17.5 18.2 19.0 19.7 20.4 21.2 21.9 3.2
19.7 3.5 6.4 9.4 12.3 15.3 18.3 21.2 5.0 7.9 10.9 13.9 16.8 19.8 22.7 3.1
16.0 15.1 15.8 16.5 17.3 18.0 18.7 19.4 18.6 19.3 20.0 20.7 21.4 22.2 22.9 3.2
20.7 4.6 7.5 10.4 13.4 16.3 19.2 22.2 6.1 9.0 11.9 14.9 17.8 20.7 23.7 3.1

14.5 13.4 14.1 14.8 15.5 16.2 16.9 17.6 16.5 17.2 17.9 18.6 19.3 20.1 20.8 3.0
18.9 3.2 6.0 8.8 11.6 14.4 17.3 20.1 4.3 7.1 10.0 12.8 15.6 18.4 21.3 2.7
15.5 14.5 15.2 15.9 16.5 17.2 17.9 18.6 17.6 18.3 19.0 19.7 20.3 21.0 21.7 3.0
19.9 4.2 7.0 9.8 12.6 15.4 18.2 21.0 5.4 8.2 11.0 13.8 16.6 19.4 22.2 2.7

5.5 5.7 5.8 5.9 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8 6.9 7.0 7.0 2.1
7.2 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.9 8.0 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.7 8.8 2.1
4.9 16.0 14.8 13.5 12.3 11.0 9.8 8.5 19.7 18.4 17.2 15.9 14.7 13.4 12.2 2.1
6.8 12.6 12.1 11.5 10.9 10.3 9.7 9.2 15.0 14.5 13.9 13.3 12.7 12.1 11.6 2.4
5.5 5.7 5.8 5.9 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8 6.9 7.0 7.0 2.1
7.2 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.9 8.0 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.7 8.8 2.1
4.9 16.0 14.8 13.5 12.3 11.0 9.8 8.5 19.7 18.4 17.2 15.9 14.7 13.4 12.2 2.1
6.3 12.2 11.6 11.0 10.5 9.9 9.3 8.7 14.6 14.0 13.4 12.9 12.3 11.7 11.1 2.4

Page 44 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

No of raked piles = 24 nos

.
TD
No of vertical piles = 25 nos
Angle of inclination of Raker piles = 10 Degree

SUMMERY OF FORCES :

S.N. Description
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne
LC-1 NS LWL Span dislodge case 4.7 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 5.1 5.2 5.2 5.2
LC-2 NS LWL No Live load 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 6.1 6.3 6.3 6.3
LC-3 NS LWL With LL max reaction case 11.8 10.5 9.2 7.8 6.5 5.2 3.9 13.0 12.0 10.7 9.3
LC-4 NS LWL With LL max moment case 11.0 9.8 8.5 7.3 6.0 4.7 3.5 12.2 11.3 10.0 8.7

LC-5 LC-1 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 (50% seis -0.3 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.6 1.3 1.7 2.0 2.3
LC-6 LC-1 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 (50% seis 0.3 1.3 2.4 3.4 4.4 5.4 6.5 1.0 2.1 3.2 4.2
LC-7 LC-1 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 (50% seism 0.1 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.6 2.0 1.7 2.1 2.4 2.7
LC-8 LC-1 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 (50% seism 0.7 1.7 2.7 3.8 4.8 5.8 6.8 1.4 2.5 3.6 4.6

LC-9 LC-2 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 -5.4 -4.6 -3.7 -2.8 -2.0 -1.1 -0.2 -2.2 -1.4 -0.5 0.4
LC-10 LC-2 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 -6.0 -3.1 -0.2 2.7 5.5 8.4 11.3 -4.6 -1.8 1.2 4.2
LC-11 LC-2 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 -4.5 -3.6 -2.8 -1.9 -1.0 -0.2 0.7 -1.3 -0.4 0.5 1.4
LC-12 LC-2 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 -5.1 -2.2 0.7 3.6 6.5 9.4 12.2 -3.7 -0.8 2.2 5.1

LC-13 LC-3 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 -4.0 -3.4 -2.7 -2.1 -1.4 -0.8 -0.2 -0.8 -0.1 0.5 1.2
LC-14 LC-3 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 -4.8 -2.0 0.7 3.4 6.1 8.9 11.6 -3.4 -0.6 2.2 5.0
LC-15 LC-3 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 -2.9 -2.3 -1.7 -1.1 -0.5 0.1 0.8 0.3 0.9 1.6 2.2
LC-16 LC-3 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 -3.7 -1.0 1.7 4.4 7.1 9.8 12.5 -2.3 0.4 3.2 6.0

LC-17 LC-4 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 -3.4 -2.8 -2.1 -1.5 -0.8 -0.2 0.5 -0.5 0.1 0.8 1.5
LC-18 LC-4 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 -4.2 -1.5 1.3 4.0 6.7 9.5 12.2 -3.1 -0.4 2.4 5.2
LC-19 LC-4 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 -2.4 -1.8 -1.1 -0.5 0.1 0.8 1.4 0.5 1.2 1.8 2.5
LC-20 LC-4 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 -3.2 -0.4 2.3 5.0 7.7 10.4 13.1 -2.1 0.7 3.5 6.3

LC-21 NS HFL Span dislodge case 6.0 6.1 6.1 6.2 6.2 6.3 6.3 6.4 6.6 6.7 6.7
LC-22 NS HFL No Live load 6.8 6.8 6.9 6.9 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.4 7.7 7.8 7.8
LC-23 NS HFL With LL max reaction case 13.1 11.8 10.5 9.3 8.0 6.7 5.4 14.3 13.4 12.1 10.8
LC-24 NS HFL With LL max moment case 12.5 11.3 10.1 8.9 7.7 6.5 5.2 13.7 12.9 11.6 10.4

LC-25 LC-21 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 (50% se 0.7 1.1 1.5 1.9 2.2 2.6 3.0 2.5 2.9 3.3 3.7

Page 45 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

LC-26 LC-21 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 (50% se 1.3 2.5 3.6 4.7 5.9 7.0 8.2 2.1 3.3 4.5 5.7
LC-27 LC-21 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 (50% sei 1.1 1.5 1.9 2.3 2.6 3.0 3.4 2.9 3.3 3.7 4.1

.
TD
LC-28 LC-21 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 (50% sei 1.7 2.9 4.0 5.1 6.3 7.4 8.6 2.5 3.7 4.9 6.1

LC-29 LC-22 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 -4.7 -3.7 -2.7 -1.8 -0.8 0.1 1.1 -1.3 -0.3 0.7 1.7
LC-30 LC-22 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 -5.2 -2.2 0.9 4.0 7.0 10.1 13.2 -3.8 -0.7 2.5 5.6
LC-31 LC-22 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 -3.7 -2.8 -1.8 -0.9 0.1 1.0 2.0 -0.3 0.6 1.6 2.6
LC-32 LC-22 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 -4.3 -1.2 1.8 4.9 8.0 11.0 14.1 -2.8 0.2 3.4 6.6

LC-33 LC-23 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 -3.2 -2.5 -1.8 -1.0 -0.3 0.4 1.1 0.2 0.9 1.7 2.4
LC-34 LC-23 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 -4.0 -1.1 1.8 4.7 7.6 10.5 13.5 -2.5 0.4 3.4 6.4
LC-35 LC-23 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 -2.2 -1.5 -0.8 0.0 0.7 1.4 2.1 1.2 2.0 2.7 3.5
LC-36 LC-23 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 -3.0 -0.1 2.8 5.7 8.6 11.5 14.4 -1.5 1.5 4.4 7.4

LC-37 LC-24 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 -2.2 -1.5 -0.8 -0.1 0.6 1.3 2.0 0.9 1.7 2.4 3.1
LC-38 LC-24 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 -2.6 0.1 2.9 5.7 8.5 11.3 14.0 -1.5 1.3 4.2 7.1
LC-39 LC-24 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 -1.1 -0.4 0.2 0.9 1.6 2.3 2.9 2.0 2.7 3.4 4.1
LC-40 LC-24 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 -1.6 1.2 3.9 6.7 9.4 12.2 15.0 -0.4 2.4 5.2 8.1

LC-41 NS LWL Span dislodge case+wind load 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.7 2.8 2.9
LC-42 NS LWL No Live load+wind load 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.2 4.4 4.5 4.6
LC-43 NS LWL With LL max reaction case+wind load -2.1 -3.3 -4.6 -5.8 -7.0 -8.2 -9.5 1.5 0.3 -1.0 -2.3
LC-44 NS LWL With LL max reaction succeding+win 0.6 0.1 -0.5 -1.1 -1.6 -2.2 -2.8 3.0 2.5 1.9 1.3
LC-45 NS HFL Span dislodge case+wind load 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.7 2.8 2.9
LC-46 NS HFL No Live load+wind load 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.2 4.4 4.5 4.6
LC-47 NS HFL With LL max reaction case+wind load -2.1 -3.3 -4.6 -5.8 -7.0 -8.2 -9.5 1.5 0.3 -1.0 -2.3
LC-48 NS HFL With LL max reaction succeding+win 0.2 -0.4 -0.9 -1.5 -2.1 -2.6 -3.2 2.6 2.1 1.5 0.9

Page 46 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

.
TD
Pile Reaction
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne
5.2 5.2 5.1 5.4 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.4 5.7 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.7
6.3 6.3 6.1 6.7 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.7 7.3 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.4
7.9 6.6 5.0 14.2 13.2 11.9 10.5 9.1 7.8 6.2 15.3 14.4 13.1 11.7 10.4 9.0 7.4
7.4 6.1 4.7 13.4 12.5 11.2 9.9 8.6 7.3 5.8 14.5 13.7 12.4 11.1 9.8 8.5 7.0

2.6 3.0 3.2 2.9 3.4 3.7 4.0 4.3 4.6 4.8 4.6 5.0 5.3 5.7 6.0 6.3 6.4
5.3 6.3 7.2 1.7 2.8 3.9 4.9 6.0 7.0 7.9 2.4 3.5 4.6 5.7 6.7 7.8 8.6
3.0 3.4 3.6 3.3 3.8 4.1 4.4 4.7 5.0 5.2 5.0 5.4 5.8 6.1 6.4 6.7 6.8
5.7 6.7 7.6 2.1 3.2 4.3 5.3 6.4 7.5 8.3 2.8 4.0 5.0 6.1 7.1 8.2 9.0

1.3 2.2 3.0 1.0 2.0 2.9 3.8 4.7 5.5 6.2 4.3 5.3 6.2 7.1 8.0 8.9 9.5
7.2 10.2 12.7 -3.2 -0.3 2.7 5.6 8.6 11.6 14.1 -1.8 1.1 4.1 7.1 10.1 13.1 15.5
2.3 3.2 3.9 2.0 2.9 3.8 4.7 5.6 6.5 7.2 5.2 6.3 7.2 8.1 9.0 9.8 10.4
8.1 11.1 13.7 -2.3 0.6 3.6 6.6 9.6 12.6 15.1 -0.8 2.1 5.1 8.1 11.0 14.0 16.5

1.9 2.5 3.1 2.5 3.2 3.9 4.5 5.2 5.9 6.3 5.7 6.6 7.2 7.9 8.6 9.2 9.6
7.8 10.6 13.0 -1.9 0.8 3.6 6.4 9.2 12.1 14.4 -0.5 2.3 5.1 7.9 10.7 13.5 15.8
2.9 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.3 4.9 5.6 6.2 6.8 7.3 6.8 7.6 8.3 8.9 9.6 10.2 10.5
8.8 11.6 13.9 -0.9 1.9 4.7 7.5 10.2 13.0 15.3 0.5 3.3 6.1 8.9 11.7 14.5 16.8

2.1 2.8 3.4 2.4 3.1 3.8 4.5 5.1 5.8 6.3 5.3 6.1 6.8 7.5 8.1 8.8 9.2
8.1 10.9 13.3 -2.1 0.7 3.5 6.3 9.2 12.0 14.4 -1.0 1.8 4.6 7.5 10.3 13.1 15.4
3.1 3.8 4.3 3.4 4.2 4.8 5.5 6.1 6.8 7.2 6.3 7.2 7.8 8.5 9.1 9.8 10.1
9.0 11.8 14.2 -1.0 1.8 4.6 7.4 10.2 13.0 15.3 0.1 2.9 5.7 8.5 11.3 14.1 16.4

6.8 6.8 6.7 6.7 7.0 7.0 7.1 7.1 7.2 7.0 7.1 7.3 7.4 7.4 7.5 7.5 7.4
7.8 7.9 7.7 8.1 8.4 8.4 8.5 8.5 8.6 8.4 8.7 9.1 9.1 9.2 9.2 9.3 9.0
9.5 8.2 6.6 15.5 14.7 13.4 12.0 10.7 9.4 7.8 16.7 15.9 14.6 13.3 12.0 10.7 9.1
9.1 7.9 6.5 14.9 14.1 12.9 11.6 10.4 9.1 7.7 16.1 15.4 14.1 12.9 11.6 10.4 8.9

4.1 4.5 4.7 4.2 4.7 5.1 5.5 5.9 6.2 6.4 5.9 6.5 6.9 7.2 7.6 8.0 8.1

Page 47 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

6.9 8.0 8.9 2.8 4.1 5.3 6.5 7.6 8.8 9.7 3.6 4.9 6.1 7.2 8.4 9.6 10.4
4.5 4.9 5.1 4.6 5.1 5.5 5.9 6.3 6.6 6.8 6.3 6.9 7.3 7.6 8.0 8.4 8.5

.
TD
7.3 8.4 9.3 3.2 4.5 5.7 6.9 8.0 9.2 10.1 4.0 5.3 6.5 7.6 8.8 10.0 10.8

2.6 3.6 4.5 2.2 3.2 4.2 5.2 6.2 7.1 7.9 5.6 6.7 7.7 8.7 9.7 10.6 11.3
8.8 12.0 14.7 -2.3 0.8 4.0 7.2 10.3 13.5 16.2 -0.8 2.3 5.5 8.7 11.8 15.0 17.6
3.6 4.6 5.4 3.1 4.2 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 8.8 6.5 7.7 8.7 9.6 10.6 11.6 12.2
9.7 12.9 15.6 -1.4 1.8 4.9 8.1 11.3 14.4 17.1 0.1 3.3 6.5 9.6 12.8 16.0 18.6

3.2 3.9 4.6 3.6 4.5 5.2 6.0 6.7 7.5 8.0 7.0 8.0 8.7 9.5 10.2 11.0 11.4
9.4 12.4 14.9 -1.0 1.9 4.9 7.9 10.9 13.9 16.4 0.5 3.5 6.5 9.5 12.5 15.5 17.9
4.2 4.9 5.5 4.7 5.5 6.3 7.0 7.7 8.4 8.9 8.1 9.0 9.8 10.5 11.2 12.0 12.3
10.4 13.4 15.9 0.0 3.0 6.0 9.0 11.9 14.9 17.4 1.5 4.5 7.5 10.5 13.5 16.5 18.9

3.8 4.5 5.1 4.0 4.8 5.5 6.3 7.0 7.7 8.2 7.1 8.0 8.7 9.4 10.1 10.9 11.2
9.9 12.8 15.2 -0.3 2.5 5.4 8.2 11.1 14.0 16.3 0.8 3.7 6.6 9.4 12.3 15.2 17.5
4.8 5.5 6.0 5.0 5.9 6.6 7.3 8.0 8.7 9.1 8.1 9.1 9.8 10.5 11.2 11.9 12.2
10.9 13.8 16.1 0.7 3.6 6.4 9.3 12.1 15.0 17.3 1.9 4.8 7.6 10.5 13.3 16.1 18.4

3.0 3.1 3.1 3.3 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.9 4.1 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.6
4.7 4.8 4.7 4.9 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.5 5.7 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.3
-3.5 -4.8 -5.9 5.1 3.9 2.7 1.4 0.1 -1.1 -2.3 8.6 7.6 6.4 5.1 3.8 2.6 1.2
0.7 0.2 -0.4 5.4 4.9 4.4 3.8 3.2 2.6 1.9 7.7 7.4 6.8 6.2 5.6 5.0 4.3
3.0 3.1 3.1 3.3 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.9 4.1 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.6
4.7 4.8 4.7 4.9 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.5 5.7 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.3
-3.5 -4.8 -5.9 5.1 3.9 2.7 1.4 0.1 -1.1 -2.3 8.6 7.6 6.4 5.1 3.8 2.6 1.2
0.3 -0.3 -0.8 4.9 4.5 3.9 3.3 2.7 2.2 1.5 7.3 6.9 6.3 5.8 5.2 4.6 3.9

Page 48 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

.
TD
over Pile No.
29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46
Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne
6.0 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.0 6.3 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.3 6.6 6.8 6.8 6.8
8.0 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.0 8.6 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.6 9.2 9.5 9.5 9.5
16.5 15.7 14.3 12.9 11.6 10.2 8.6 17.7 16.9 15.5 14.1 12.8 11.4 9.7 18.9 18.1 16.7 15.4
15.7 14.9 13.6 12.3 11.0 9.7 8.2 16.9 16.1 14.8 13.5 12.2 10.9 9.3 18.1 17.3 16.0 14.7

6.2 6.7 7.0 7.3 7.6 8.0 8.0 7.8 8.4 8.7 9.0 9.3 9.6 9.7 9.4 10.0 10.4 10.7
3.1 4.3 5.3 6.4 7.4 8.5 9.3 3.8 5.0 6.1 7.1 8.2 9.2 10.0 4.5 5.7 6.8 7.8
6.6 7.1 7.4 7.7 8.1 8.4 8.4 8.2 8.8 9.1 9.4 9.7 10.0 10.1 9.8 10.4 10.8 11.1
3.5 4.7 5.7 6.8 7.9 8.9 9.7 4.2 5.4 6.5 7.5 8.6 9.6 10.4 4.9 6.1 7.2 8.3

7.5 8.6 9.5 10.4 11.3 12.2 12.7 10.8 12.0 12.9 13.8 14.7 15.6 16.0 14.0 15.3 16.2 17.1
-0.4 2.6 5.6 8.6 11.5 14.5 17.0 1.0 4.0 7.0 10.0 13.0 16.0 18.4 2.4 5.5 8.5 11.5
8.5 9.6 10.5 11.4 12.3 13.2 13.7 11.7 13.0 13.9 14.7 15.6 16.5 16.9 14.9 16.3 17.2 18.1
0.6 3.6 6.5 9.5 12.5 15.5 17.9 2.0 5.0 8.0 11.0 13.9 16.9 19.3 3.4 6.5 9.4 12.4

9.0 9.9 10.6 11.2 11.9 12.6 12.8 12.2 13.3 13.9 14.6 15.2 15.9 16.1 15.5 16.6 17.3 17.9
0.9 3.7 6.5 9.4 12.2 15.0 17.2 2.3 5.2 8.0 10.8 13.6 16.4 18.7 3.7 6.6 9.5 12.3
10.0 11.0 11.6 12.3 12.9 13.5 13.8 13.3 14.3 15.0 15.6 16.3 16.9 17.0 16.5 17.7 18.3 19.0
2.0 4.8 7.6 10.4 13.2 16.0 18.2 3.4 6.3 9.1 11.8 14.6 17.4 19.6 4.8 7.7 10.5 13.3

8.2 9.1 9.8 10.4 11.1 11.8 12.1 11.1 12.1 12.8 13.4 14.1 14.8 15.0 14.0 15.1 15.8 16.4
0.1 2.9 5.7 8.6 11.4 14.2 16.5 1.2 4.0 6.9 9.7 12.5 15.3 17.6 2.3 5.1 8.0 10.8
9.2 10.2 10.8 11.5 12.1 12.8 13.0 12.1 13.2 13.8 14.5 15.1 15.8 15.9 15.1 16.2 16.8 17.5
1.2 4.0 6.8 9.6 12.4 15.2 17.4 2.2 5.1 7.9 10.7 13.5 16.3 18.5 3.3 6.2 9.0 11.8

7.4 7.7 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.9 7.7 7.8 8.1 8.1 8.2 8.2 8.3 8.0 8.1 8.4 8.5 8.5
9.4 9.7 9.8 9.8 9.9 9.9 9.7 10.1 10.4 10.5 10.5 10.6 10.6 10.3 10.7 11.1 11.1 11.2
17.9 17.2 15.9 14.5 13.2 11.9 10.3 19.2 18.4 17.1 15.8 14.5 13.2 11.5 20.4 19.7 18.4 17.0
17.3 16.6 15.4 14.1 12.9 11.6 10.1 18.5 17.9 16.6 15.4 14.1 12.9 11.3 19.7 19.1 17.9 16.6

7.6 8.2 8.6 9.0 9.4 9.8 9.9 9.3 10.0 10.4 10.8 11.2 11.6 11.6 11.1 11.8 12.2 12.6

Page 49 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

4.4 5.7 6.8 8.0 9.2 10.4 11.2 5.1 6.4 7.6 8.8 10.0 11.2 12.0 5.9 7.2 8.4 9.6
8.0 8.6 9.0 9.4 9.8 10.2 10.3 9.7 10.4 10.8 11.2 11.6 12.0 12.0 11.5 12.2 12.6 13.0

.
TD
4.8 6.1 7.3 8.4 9.6 10.8 11.6 5.5 6.9 8.0 9.2 10.4 11.6 12.4 6.3 7.6 8.8 10.0

9.0 10.2 11.2 12.2 13.2 14.2 14.7 12.4 13.7 14.7 15.7 16.7 17.7 18.1 15.8 17.2 18.2 19.2
0.7 3.9 7.0 10.2 13.4 16.5 19.1 2.2 5.4 8.6 11.7 14.9 18.1 20.6 3.6 6.9 10.1 13.3
9.9 11.2 12.2 13.1 14.1 15.1 15.6 13.3 14.7 15.7 16.7 17.6 18.6 19.0 16.7 18.2 19.2 20.2
1.6 4.8 8.0 11.2 14.3 17.5 20.0 3.1 6.4 9.5 12.7 15.9 19.0 21.5 4.6 7.9 11.1 14.2

10.4 11.5 12.2 13.0 13.7 14.5 14.8 13.8 15.0 15.7 16.5 17.2 18.0 18.2 17.2 18.5 19.3 20.0
1.9 5.0 8.0 11.0 14.0 17.0 19.4 3.4 6.5 9.5 12.5 15.5 18.5 20.9 4.9 8.1 11.1 14.1
11.5 12.6 13.3 14.0 14.7 15.5 15.7 14.9 16.1 16.8 17.5 18.3 19.0 19.1 18.3 19.6 20.3 21.0
3.0 6.1 9.1 12.0 15.0 18.0 20.3 4.5 7.6 10.6 13.6 16.5 19.5 21.8 6.0 9.1 12.1 15.1

10.1 11.2 11.9 12.6 13.3 14.0 14.3 13.2 14.3 15.0 15.8 16.5 17.2 17.4 16.3 17.5 18.2 18.9
2.0 4.9 7.7 10.6 13.5 16.3 18.6 3.1 6.1 8.9 11.8 14.7 17.5 19.8 4.3 7.3 10.1 13.0
11.2 12.2 12.9 13.6 14.3 15.0 15.2 14.3 15.4 16.1 16.8 17.5 18.2 18.3 17.3 18.6 19.3 20.0
3.0 6.0 8.8 11.6 14.5 17.3 19.6 4.2 7.1 10.0 12.8 15.7 18.5 20.7 5.3 8.3 11.2 14.0

4.8 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.4 5.6 5.9 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.2 6.4 6.7 6.8 6.9
6.5 6.8 6.9 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.1 7.3 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.9 8.0 7.9 8.1 8.4 8.5 8.6
12.2 11.3 10.0 8.8 7.5 6.2 4.8 15.8 15.0 13.7 12.5 11.2 9.9 8.4 19.4 18.7 17.4 16.1
10.1 9.8 9.2 8.6 8.0 7.5 6.7 12.4 12.2 11.7 11.1 10.5 9.9 9.0 14.8 14.7 14.1 13.5
4.8 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.4 5.6 5.9 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.2 6.4 6.7 6.8 6.9
6.5 6.8 6.9 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.1 7.3 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.9 8.0 7.9 8.1 8.4 8.5 8.6
12.2 11.3 10.0 8.8 7.5 6.2 4.8 15.8 15.0 13.7 12.5 11.2 9.9 8.4 19.4 18.7 17.4 16.1
9.7 9.4 8.8 8.2 7.6 7.0 6.2 12.0 11.8 11.2 10.6 10.0 9.5 8.6 14.4 14.2 13.6 13.1

Page 50 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

LWL Condi

.
TD
Maximum R
Minimum R
Self weight
Max Reactio
Min Reactio

Pile capacity

HFL Condi

Maximum R
Minimum R
Self weight
Max Reactio
Min Reactio

Pile capacity

Page 51 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

.
TD
47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56
Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne
6.8 6.8 6.6
9.5 9.5 9.2
14.0 12.6 10.9
13.4 12.1 10.5

11.0 11.3 11.3


8.9 10.0 10.7
11.4 11.7 11.7
9.3 10.4 11.1

18.0 18.9 19.2


14.4 17.4 19.8
19.0 19.9 20.1
15.4 18.4 20.7

18.6 19.2 19.3


15.1 17.9 20.1
19.6 20.2 20.2
16.1 18.9 21.0

17.1 17.8 17.9


13.6 16.4 18.7
18.1 18.8 18.8
14.6 17.4 19.6

8.6 8.6 8.4


11.2 11.3 11.0
15.7 14.4 12.7
15.4 14.1 12.5

12.9 13.3 13.3

Page 52 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

10.8 11.9 12.7


13.4 13.7 13.7

.
TD
11.2 12.3 13.1

20.2 21.2 21.5


16.4 19.6 22.1
21.2 22.1 22.4
17.4 20.6 23.0

20.8 21.5 21.6


17.1 20.1 22.4
21.8 22.5 22.5
18.1 21.1 23.3

19.6 20.4 20.4


15.8 18.7 20.9
20.7 21.4 21.4
16.9 19.7 21.9

7.0 7.1 6.9


8.7 8.8 8.7
14.9 13.6 12.0
12.9 12.3 11.4
7.0 7.1 6.9
8.7 8.8 8.7
14.9 13.6 12.0
12.5 11.9 11.0

Page 53 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

ition
Non-Seismic Seismic Case wind case

.
TD
Reaction Over Pile = 18.9 Tonne 21.0 Tonne 19.4 Tonne
Reaction Over Pile = 3.5 Tonne -6.0 Tonne -9.5 Tonne
of pile = 1.7 Tonne 1.7 Tonne 1.7 Tonne
on Over Pile+with SW of pile = 20.6 Tonne 22.8 Tonne 21.1 Tonne
on Over+with SW of pile = 5.2 Tonne -4.3 Tonne -7.7 Tonne

y = 50 Tonne OK [Seismic]

ition
Non-Seismic Seismic Case wind case
Reaction Over Pile = 20.4 Tonne 23.3 Tonne 19.4 Tonne
Reaction Over Pile = 5.2 Tonne -5.2 Tonne -9.5 Tonne
of pile = 1.7 Tonne 1.7 Tonne 1.7 Tonne
on Over Pile+with SW of pile = 22.1 Tonne 25.1 Tonne 21.1 Tonne
on Over+with SW of pile = 7.0 Tonne -3.5 Tonne -7.7 Tonne

y = 50 Tonne OK [Seismic]

Page 54 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

ULS , SUMMERY OF FORCES AT PILE CAP BOTTOM

.
TD
Pile Coordinates Pile Coordinates Pile Coordinates Pile Coordinates Pile Coordinates
N = 49 Nos. S.N. L T S.N. L T S.N. L T S.N. L T S.N. L T
1 -3 -3.0 13 -2 2 25 0 0 37 2 -2 49 3 3
2 -3 -2.0 14 -2 3 26 0 1 38 2 -1
1 1 3 -3 -1.0 15 -1 -3 27 0 2 39 2 0
4 -3 0.0 16 -1 -2 28 0 3 40 2 1
1 5 -3 1.0 17 -1 -1 29 1 -3 41 2 2
6 -3 2.0 18 -1 0 30 1 -2 42 2 3
1 7 -3 3.0 19 -1 1 31 1 -1 43 3 -3
1 8 -2 -3.0 20 -1 2 32 1 0 44 3 -2
9 -2 -2.0 21 -1 3 33 1 1 45 3 -1
1 10 -2 -1.0 22 0 -3 34 1 2 46 3 0
1 8 11 -2 0.0 23 0 -2 35 1 3 47 3 1
12 -2 1.0 24 0 -1 36 2 -3 48 3 2
1  r2 193.00 181.00

1
1
ULS, Maximum & Minimum Reactions over Pile LWL
8 Non-Seismic Seismic Case wind load
Maximum Reaction Over Pile 33.2 Tonne 36.4 Tonne 36.7 Tonne
Minimum Reaction Over Pile 6.4 Tonne -4.4 Tonne 0.9 Tonne
Maximum Horizontal Force/ Pile 0.8 Tonne 3.3 Tonne 2.7 Tonne

ULS, Maximum & Minimum Reactions over Pile HFL


Non-Seismic Seismic Case wind load
Maximum Reaction Over Pile 36.7 Tonne 40.8 Tonne 39.5 Tonne
Minimum Reaction Over Pile 9.3 Tonne -1.9 Tonne 1.7 Tonne
Maximum Horizontal Force/ Pile 0.7 Tonne 3.7 Tonne 2.7 Tonne

Page 55 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

ULS , SUMMERY OF FORCES AT PILE CAP BOTTOM


SUMMERY OF FORCES :

.
TD
S.N. Description Forces @ Pile cap Bootom
V HL HT MTT MLL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Tonne Tonne Tonne Tm Tm Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne
LC-1 NS LWL Span dislodge case Comb-1 662.893 9.9204 0 92.9525 0.09302 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6
LC-2 NS LWL No Live load Comb-1 765.43 19.8408 0 182.641 0.09302 12.8 12.8 12.8 12.8 12.8 12.8 12.8 13.7 13.7 13.7 13.7 13.7
LC-3 NS LWL With LL max reaction case Co 1064.93 38.6131 0 345.021 -365.303 22.4 20.4 18.4 16.4 14.4 12.3 10.3 24.2 22.2 20.2 18.2 16.1
LC-4 NS LWL With LL max moment case Co 1023.57 38.4173 0 343.327 -346.534 21.3 19.4 17.5 15.6 13.6 11.7 9.8 23.1 21.2 19.2 17.3 15.4

LC-5 NS LWL Span dislodge case Comb-2 475.51 6.87814 0 78.4505 0.06891 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9
LC-6 NS LWL No Live load Comb-2 558.18 13.7563 0 156.901 0.06891 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8
LC-7 NS LWL With LL max reaction case Co 817.752 26.7718 0 297.631 -316.608 17.3 15.6 13.8 12.1 10.3 8.6 6.8 18.9 17.1 15.4 13.6 11.9
LC-8 NS LWL With LL max moment case Co 785.172 26.636 0 296.163 -300.341 16.4 14.7 13.1 11.4 9.8 8.1 6.4 17.9 16.3 14.6 13.0 11.3

LC-9 LC-1 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 (50 638.935 73.5748 22.3358 432.532 84.8509 4.9 5.4 5.8 6.3 6.8 7.3 7.7 7.2 7.6 8.1 8.6 9.0
LC-10 LC-1 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 (50 638.935 24.8501 59.5622 163.563 282.624 5.8 7.4 8.9 10.5 12.1 13.6 15.2 6.7 8.2 9.8 11.3 12.9
LC-11 LC-1 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 (50 668.716 73.5748 22.3358 432.78 84.8551 5.5 6.0 6.5 6.9 7.4 7.9 8.3 7.8 8.2 8.7 9.2 9.6
LC-12 LC-1 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 (50 668.716 31.0627 59.5622 163.811 282.628 6.4 8.0 9.5 11.1 12.7 14.2 15.8 7.3 8.8 10.4 11.9 13.5

LC-13 LC-2 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 730.626 153.499 52.2049 933.465 238.91 -3.6 -2.2 -0.9 0.4 1.7 3.0 4.4 1.3 2.6 3.9 5.2 6.6
LC-14 LC-2 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 730.626 70.0617 139.213 395.527 796.159 -4.4 0.0 4.4 8.8 13.2 17.6 22.0 -2.4 2.0 6.4 10.8 15.2
LC-15 LC-2 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 800.233 153.499 52.2049 934.457 238.918 -2.2 -0.8 0.5 1.8 3.1 4.4 5.8 2.7 4.0 5.3 6.6 8.0
LC-16 LC-2 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 800.233 70.0617 139.213 396.519 796.168 -3.0 1.4 5.8 10.2 14.6 19.0 23.4 -1.0 3.4 7.8 12.2 16.6

LC-17 LC-3 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 768.134 155.24 52.9327 952.298 200.79 -2.5 -1.3 -0.2 0.9 2.0 3.1 4.2 2.5 3.6 4.7 5.8 6.9
LC-18 LC-3 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 768.134 72.2389 141.154 414.36 775.865 -3.6 0.7 4.9 9.2 13.5 17.8 22.1 -1.5 2.8 7.1 11.4 15.7
LC-19 LC-3 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 842.593 155.24 52.9327 953.289 194.879 -0.9 0.2 1.3 2.4 3.5 4.5 5.6 4.1 5.2 6.2 7.3 8.4
LC-20 LC-3 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 842.593 72.2389 141.154 415.352 769.954 -2.0 2.2 6.5 10.7 15.0 19.2 23.5 0.1 4.4 8.6 12.9 17.1

LC-21 LC-4 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 740.225 146.076 52.8954 853.21 202.748 -1.5 -0.4 0.7 1.8 3.0 4.1 5.2 2.9 4.0 5.1 6.3 7.4
LC-22 LC-4 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 740.225 60.7836 141.054 315.272 776.908 -2.7 1.6 5.9 10.2 14.5 18.8 23.1 -1.0 3.3 7.5 11.8 16.1
LC-23 LC-4 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 814.434 146.076 52.8954 854.201 197.141 0.1 1.2 2.3 3.3 4.4 5.5 6.6 4.5 5.6 6.7 7.8 8.9

Page 56 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

LC-24 LC-4 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 814.434 60.7836 141.054 316.264 771.301 -1.1 3.2 7.4 11.7 16.0 20.2 24.5 0.6 4.8 9.1 13.3 17.6

LC-25 NS HFL Span dislodge case Comb-1 830.722 10.9372 7.08887 97.7646 8.46723 15.3 15.3 15.4 15.4 15.5 15.5 15.6 15.8 15.8 15.9 15.9 16.0

.
TD
LC-26 NS HFL No Live load Comb-1 942.326 18.8735 7.08887 189.085 8.46723 16.2 16.2 16.2 16.3 16.3 16.4 16.4 17.1 17.2 17.2 17.3 17.3
LC-27 NS HFL With LL max reaction case Com 1241.83 33.8914 7.08887 351.466 -356.929 25.8 23.8 21.9 19.9 17.9 15.9 14.0 27.6 25.6 23.7 21.7 19.7
LC-28 NS HFL With LL max moment case Com1213.46 33.7347 7.08887 349.771 -338.16 24.9 23.1 21.2 19.3 17.5 15.6 13.7 26.7 24.9 23.0 21.1 19.3

LC-29 NS HFL Span dislodge case Comb-2 604.143 9.87902 7.08887 84.8949 8.44312 10.9 10.9 11.0 11.0 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.3 11.4 11.4 11.4 11.5
LC-30 NS HFL No Live load Comb-2 686.813 13.4057 7.08887 163.345 8.44312 11.3 11.4 11.4 11.5 11.5 11.6 11.6 12.2 12.2 12.3 12.3 12.4
LC-31 NS HFL With LL max reaction case Com 946.384 29.7727 7.08887 304.075 -308.234 19.7 18.0 16.3 14.6 12.9 11.2 9.5 21.3 19.6 17.9 16.2 14.5
LC-32 NS HFL With LL max moment case Com923.428 29.6369 7.08887 302.607 -291.967 19.0 17.4 15.8 14.1 12.5 10.9 9.3 20.5 18.9 17.3 15.7 14.1

LC-33 LC-21 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 ( 815.831 86.8421 32.9675 494.701 98.9935 7.3 7.9 8.4 9.0 9.5 10.1 10.6 9.9 10.4 11.0 11.5 12.1
LC-34 LC-21 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 ( 815.831 42.1358 74.6808 216.759 310.226 8.1 9.9 11.6 13.3 15.0 16.7 18.4 9.3 11.0 12.7 14.4 16.1
LC-35 LC-21 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 (5 845.612 86.8421 32.9675 494.949 98.9977 7.9 8.5 9.0 9.6 10.1 10.7 11.2 10.5 11.0 11.6 12.1 12.7
LC-36 LC-21 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 (5 845.612 42.1358 74.6808 217.007 310.231 8.7 10.5 12.2 13.9 15.6 17.3 19.0 9.9 11.6 13.3 15.0 16.7

LC-37 LC-22 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 907.523 170.683 64.0176 982.709 254.975 -1.0 0.4 1.8 3.2 4.7 6.1 7.5 4.1 5.5 6.9 8.3 9.7
LC-38 LC-22 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 907.523 80.5206 157.481 426.825 830.171 -1.9 2.7 7.3 11.9 16.5 21.1 25.6 0.3 4.9 9.5 14.1 18.7
LC-39 LC-22 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 977.13 170.683 64.0176 983.701 254.984 0.4 1.8 3.2 4.7 6.1 7.5 8.9 5.5 6.9 8.3 9.7 11.2
LC-40 LC-22 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 977.13 80.5206 157.481 427.817 830.179 -0.5 4.1 8.7 13.3 17.9 22.5 27.1 1.7 6.3 10.9 15.5 20.1

LC-41 LC-23 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 945.031 170.838 64.7454 984.38 216.855 0.4 1.6 2.8 4.0 5.2 6.4 7.6 5.5 6.7 7.9 9.1 10.3
LC-42 LC-23 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 945.031 80.7137 159.422 428.496 809.877 -0.8 3.7 8.2 12.6 17.1 21.6 26.0 1.4 5.9 10.4 14.8 19.3
LC-43 LC-23 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 1019.49 170.838 64.7454 985.371 210.944 2.0 3.2 4.3 5.5 6.7 7.8 9.0 7.1 8.3 9.4 10.6 11.8
LC-44 LC-23 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 1019.49 80.7137 159.422 429.487 803.966 0.8 5.2 9.7 14.1 18.6 23.0 27.5 3.0 7.5 11.9 16.4 20.8

LC-45 LC-24 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 930.113 161.674 64.708 885.292 218.813 1.6 2.8 4.0 5.2 6.4 7.6 8.8 6.2 7.4 8.6 9.8 11.0
LC-46 LC-24 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 930.113 69.2585 159.322 329.408 810.919 0.4 4.9 9.4 13.9 18.3 22.8 27.3 2.1 6.6 11.1 15.6 20.0
LC-47 LC-24 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 1004.32 161.674 64.708 886.283 213.206 3.2 4.4 5.5 6.7 7.9 9.1 10.3 7.8 9.0 10.1 11.3 12.5
LC-48 LC-24 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 1004.32 69.2585 159.322 330.399 805.312 2.0 6.5 10.9 15.4 19.8 24.3 28.7 3.7 8.2 12.6 17.1 21.5

LC-49 NS LWL Span dislodge case+wind load 595.93 13.6715 11.7062 96.3364 17.3789 10.4 10.5 10.6 10.7 10.8 10.9 11.0 10.9 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3
LC-50 NS LWL No Live load+wind load 712.606 42.5419 73.3924 312.246 530.145 0.9 3.8 6.8 9.7 12.6 15.5 18.5 2.5 5.4 8.4 11.3 14.2
LC-51 NS LWL With LL max reaction case+wi 996.726 61.1183 73.3924 472.932 183.518 9.9 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 12.4 13.4 14.4 15.4 16.5
LC-52 NS LWL With LL max reaction succedin 939.102 64.7876 114.516 479.405 606.242 1.7 5.0 8.4 11.7 15.1 18.4 21.8 4.1 7.5 10.8 14.2 17.5
LC-53 NS HFL Span dislodge case+wind load 733.827 13.6715 11.7062 96.3364 17.3789 13.2 13.3 13.4 13.5 13.6 13.7 13.8 13.7 13.8 13.9 14.0 14.1
LC-54 NS HFL No Live load+wind load 850.502 42.5419 73.3924 312.246 530.145 3.7 6.6 9.6 12.5 15.4 18.4 21.3 5.3 8.3 11.2 14.1 17.1
LC-55 NS HFL With LL max reaction case+wi 1134.62 61.1183 73.3924 472.932 183.518 12.8 13.8 14.8 15.8 16.8 17.8 18.8 15.2 16.2 17.2 18.3 19.3
LC-56 NS HFL With LL max reaction succedin 1077 64.7876 114.516 479.405 606.242 4.5 7.8 11.2 14.5 17.9 21.2 24.6 7.0 10.3 13.7 17.0 20.4

Page 57 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

.
TD
Pile Reaction over Pile No.
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne
12.6 12.6 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0
13.7 13.7 14.7 14.7 14.7 14.7 14.7 14.7 14.7 15.6 15.6 15.6 15.6 15.6 15.6 15.6 16.6 16.6 16.6 16.6 16.6 16.6
14.1 12.1 26.0 24.0 22.0 19.9 17.9 15.9 13.9 27.8 25.8 23.8 21.7 19.7 17.7 15.7 29.6 27.6 25.5 23.5 21.5 19.5
13.5 11.6 24.9 22.9 21.0 19.1 17.2 15.3 13.4 26.6 24.7 22.8 20.9 19.0 17.1 15.1 28.4 26.5 24.6 22.7 20.8 18.8

8.9 8.9 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.7 9.7 9.7 9.7 9.7 9.7 9.7 10.1 10.1 10.1 10.1 10.1 10.1
9.8 9.8 10.6 10.6 10.6 10.6 10.6 10.6 10.6 11.4 11.4 11.4 11.4 11.4 11.4 11.4 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2
10.1 8.4 20.4 18.6 16.9 15.1 13.4 11.6 9.9 21.9 20.2 18.4 16.7 14.9 13.2 11.4 23.5 21.7 20.0 18.2 16.5 14.7
9.6 8.0 19.5 17.8 16.1 14.5 12.8 11.2 9.5 21.0 19.3 17.7 16.0 14.4 12.7 11.0 22.5 20.9 19.2 17.6 15.9 14.2

9.5 10.0 9.4 9.9 10.3 10.8 11.3 11.7 12.2 11.6 12.1 12.6 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.4 13.9 14.3 14.8 15.3 15.7 16.2
14.5 16.0 7.5 9.1 10.6 12.2 13.8 15.3 16.9 8.4 9.9 11.5 13.0 14.6 16.2 17.7 9.2 10.8 12.3 13.9 15.4 17.0
10.1 10.6 10.0 10.5 10.9 11.4 11.9 12.3 12.8 12.2 12.7 13.2 13.6 14.1 14.6 15.1 14.5 15.0 15.4 15.9 16.4 16.8
15.1 16.6 8.1 9.7 11.2 12.8 14.4 15.9 17.5 9.0 10.5 12.1 13.6 15.2 16.8 18.3 9.8 11.4 12.9 14.5 16.1 17.6

7.9 9.2 6.1 7.4 8.8 10.1 11.4 12.7 14.0 11.0 12.3 13.6 14.9 16.2 17.6 18.9 15.8 17.1 18.4 19.7 21.1 22.4
19.6 24.0 -0.3 4.1 8.5 12.9 17.3 21.7 26.1 1.7 6.1 10.5 14.9 19.3 23.7 28.1 3.8 8.2 12.6 17.0 21.4 25.8
9.3 10.6 7.5 8.8 10.2 11.5 12.8 14.1 15.4 12.4 13.7 15.0 16.3 17.7 19.0 20.3 17.2 18.5 19.9 21.2 22.5 23.8
21.0 25.4 1.1 5.5 9.9 14.3 18.7 23.1 27.5 3.1 7.5 11.9 16.3 20.7 25.1 29.5 5.2 9.6 14.0 18.4 22.8 27.2

8.0 9.1 7.4 8.5 9.6 10.7 11.9 13.0 14.1 12.3 13.5 14.6 15.7 16.8 17.9 19.0 17.3 18.4 19.5 20.6 21.7 22.8
20.0 24.2 0.7 5.0 9.2 13.5 17.8 22.1 26.4 2.8 7.1 11.4 15.7 20.0 24.2 28.5 5.0 9.3 13.5 17.8 22.1 26.4
9.5 10.5 9.0 10.1 11.2 12.3 13.3 14.4 15.5 14.0 15.0 16.1 17.2 18.3 19.3 20.4 18.9 20.0 21.1 22.1 23.2 24.3
21.4 25.7 2.3 6.5 10.8 15.0 19.3 23.6 27.8 4.4 8.7 12.9 17.2 21.4 25.7 30.0 6.6 10.8 15.1 19.3 23.6 27.9

8.5 9.6 7.3 8.4 9.6 10.7 11.8 12.9 14.0 11.7 12.9 14.0 15.1 16.2 17.3 18.5 16.2 17.3 18.4 19.5 20.6 21.8
20.4 24.7 0.6 4.9 9.2 13.5 17.8 22.1 26.4 2.2 6.5 10.8 15.1 19.4 23.7 28.0 3.9 8.2 12.4 16.7 21.0 25.3
9.9 11.0 8.9 10.0 11.1 12.2 13.3 14.4 15.5 13.4 14.4 15.5 16.6 17.7 18.8 19.9 17.8 18.9 20.0 21.0 22.1 23.2

Page 58 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

21.9 26.1 2.2 6.5 10.7 15.0 19.2 23.5 27.8 3.8 8.1 12.4 16.6 20.9 25.1 29.4 5.5 9.7 14.0 18.3 22.5 26.8

16.0 16.1 16.3 16.4 16.4 16.4 16.5 16.5 16.6 16.8 16.9 16.9 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.1 17.3 17.4 17.4 17.5 17.5 17.6

.
TD
17.4 17.4 18.1 18.2 18.2 18.3 18.3 18.3 18.4 19.1 19.1 19.2 19.2 19.3 19.3 19.4 20.1 20.1 20.2 20.2 20.3 20.3
17.8 15.8 29.4 27.5 25.5 23.5 21.6 19.6 17.6 31.3 29.3 27.3 25.3 23.4 21.4 19.4 33.1 31.1 29.1 27.2 25.2 23.2
17.4 15.5 28.6 26.7 24.8 23.0 21.1 19.2 17.3 30.4 28.5 26.6 24.8 22.9 21.0 19.2 32.2 30.3 28.4 26.6 24.7 22.8

11.5 11.6 11.7 11.8 11.8 11.9 11.9 12.0 12.0 12.2 12.2 12.3 12.3 12.4 12.4 12.5 12.6 12.7 12.7 12.8 12.8 12.9
12.4 12.5 13.0 13.1 13.1 13.2 13.2 13.3 13.3 13.9 13.9 14.0 14.0 14.1 14.1 14.2 14.7 14.8 14.8 14.9 14.9 15.0
12.8 11.1 22.8 21.1 19.4 17.7 16.0 14.3 12.6 24.4 22.7 21.0 19.3 17.6 15.9 14.2 26.0 24.3 22.6 20.9 19.2 17.5
12.5 10.9 22.1 20.5 18.9 17.3 15.7 14.1 12.4 23.7 22.1 20.5 18.8 17.2 15.6 14.0 25.3 23.6 22.0 20.4 18.8 17.2

12.6 13.2 12.4 13.0 13.5 14.1 14.6 15.2 15.7 15.0 15.6 16.1 16.6 17.2 17.7 18.3 17.6 18.1 18.7 19.2 19.8 20.3
17.8 19.5 10.4 12.1 13.8 15.5 17.2 19.0 20.7 11.5 13.2 14.9 16.6 18.4 20.1 21.8 12.6 14.3 16.1 17.8 19.5 21.2
13.2 13.8 13.1 13.6 14.1 14.7 15.2 15.8 16.3 15.6 16.2 16.7 17.3 17.8 18.4 18.9 18.2 18.7 19.3 19.8 20.4 20.9
18.4 20.2 11.0 12.7 14.4 16.1 17.8 19.6 21.3 12.1 13.8 15.5 17.3 19.0 20.7 22.4 13.2 15.0 16.7 18.4 20.1 21.8

11.2 12.6 9.2 10.6 12.0 13.4 14.8 16.2 17.7 14.3 15.7 17.1 18.5 19.9 21.3 22.7 19.4 20.8 22.2 23.6 25.0 26.4
23.3 27.9 2.5 7.1 11.7 16.3 20.9 25.5 30.1 4.8 9.3 13.9 18.5 23.1 27.7 32.3 7.0 11.6 16.1 20.7 25.3 29.9
12.6 14.0 10.6 12.0 13.4 14.8 16.3 17.7 19.1 15.7 17.1 18.5 19.9 21.4 22.8 24.2 20.8 22.2 23.6 25.0 26.4 27.9
24.7 29.3 4.0 8.6 13.1 17.7 22.3 26.9 31.5 6.2 10.8 15.4 19.9 24.5 29.1 33.7 8.4 13.0 17.6 22.2 26.7 31.3

11.5 12.7 10.6 11.8 13.0 14.2 15.4 16.6 17.8 15.7 16.9 18.1 19.3 20.5 21.7 22.9 20.8 22.0 23.2 24.4 25.6 26.8
23.8 28.3 3.6 8.1 12.6 17.1 21.5 26.0 30.5 5.9 10.3 14.8 19.3 23.8 28.2 32.7 8.1 12.6 17.0 21.5 26.0 30.5
12.9 14.1 12.2 13.4 14.5 15.7 16.9 18.0 19.2 17.3 18.5 19.6 20.8 22.0 23.1 24.3 22.4 23.6 24.7 25.9 27.1 28.2
25.2 29.7 5.3 9.7 14.1 18.6 23.0 27.5 31.9 7.5 11.9 16.4 20.8 25.2 29.7 34.1 9.7 14.1 18.6 23.0 27.5 31.9

12.2 13.4 10.8 12.0 13.2 14.4 15.6 16.8 18.0 15.4 16.6 17.8 19.0 20.2 21.4 22.6 19.9 21.2 22.4 23.6 24.8 26.0
24.5 29.0 3.8 8.3 12.8 17.3 21.8 26.2 30.7 5.5 10.0 14.5 19.0 23.5 27.9 32.4 7.2 11.7 16.2 20.7 25.2 29.6
13.7 14.8 12.4 13.5 14.7 15.9 17.1 18.3 19.4 17.0 18.1 19.3 20.5 21.7 22.9 24.0 21.6 22.7 23.9 25.1 26.3 27.4
26.0 30.4 5.4 9.9 14.3 18.8 23.2 27.7 32.1 7.1 11.6 16.0 20.5 24.9 29.4 33.8 8.9 13.3 17.8 22.2 26.7 31.1

11.4 11.5 11.4 11.5 11.6 11.7 11.8 11.9 12.0 11.9 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 12.4 12.4 12.5 12.6 12.7 12.8 12.9
17.2 20.1 4.1 7.1 10.0 12.9 15.9 18.8 21.7 5.8 8.7 11.6 14.5 17.5 20.4 23.3 7.4 10.3 13.2 16.2 19.1 22.0
17.5 18.5 14.8 15.9 16.9 17.9 18.9 19.9 20.9 17.3 18.3 19.3 20.3 21.4 22.4 23.4 19.8 20.8 21.8 22.8 23.8 24.8
20.9 24.2 6.6 10.0 13.3 16.7 20.0 23.4 26.7 9.1 12.5 15.8 19.2 22.5 25.9 29.2 11.6 15.0 18.3 21.6 25.0 28.3
14.2 14.3 14.2 14.3 14.4 14.5 14.6 14.7 14.8 14.7 14.8 14.9 15.0 15.1 15.2 15.3 15.2 15.3 15.4 15.5 15.6 15.7
20.0 22.9 7.0 9.9 12.8 15.7 18.7 21.6 24.5 8.6 11.5 14.4 17.4 20.3 23.2 26.1 10.2 13.1 16.0 19.0 21.9 24.8
20.3 21.3 17.7 18.7 19.7 20.7 21.7 22.7 23.7 20.1 21.1 22.1 23.2 24.2 25.2 26.2 22.6 23.6 24.6 25.6 26.6 27.6
23.7 27.1 9.4 12.8 16.1 19.5 22.8 26.2 29.5 11.9 15.3 18.6 22.0 25.3 28.7 32.0 14.4 17.8 21.1 24.5 27.8 31.2

Page 59 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

.
TD
35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56
Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne
14.0 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0
16.6 17.5 17.5 17.5 17.5 17.5 17.5 17.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5
17.5 31.4 29.3 27.3 25.3 23.3 21.3 19.3 33.2 31.1 29.1 27.1 25.1 23.1 21.0
16.9 30.2 28.3 26.4 24.4 22.5 20.6 18.7 32.0 30.1 28.1 26.2 24.3 22.4 20.5

10.1 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.9 10.9 10.9 10.9 10.9 10.9 10.9
12.2 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.8 13.8 13.8 13.8 13.8 13.8 13.8
13.0 25.0 23.3 21.5 19.8 18.0 16.3 14.5 26.6 24.8 23.1 21.3 19.6 17.8 16.1
12.6 24.1 22.4 20.8 19.1 17.4 15.8 14.1 25.6 23.9 22.3 20.6 19.0 17.3 15.6

16.7 16.1 16.6 17.1 17.5 18.0 18.5 18.9 18.4 18.8 19.3 19.8 20.2 20.7 21.2
18.6 10.1 11.6 13.2 14.7 16.3 17.9 19.4 10.9 12.5 14.0 15.6 17.1 18.7 20.3
17.3 16.7 17.2 17.7 18.1 18.6 19.1 19.5 19.0 19.4 19.9 20.4 20.8 21.3 21.8
19.2 10.7 12.2 13.8 15.3 16.9 18.5 20.0 11.5 13.1 14.6 16.2 17.8 19.3 20.9

23.7 20.6 21.9 23.3 24.6 25.9 27.2 28.5 25.5 26.8 28.1 29.4 30.7 32.1 33.4
30.2 5.8 10.2 14.6 19.0 23.4 27.8 32.2 7.9 12.3 16.7 21.1 25.5 29.9 34.3
25.1 22.1 23.4 24.7 26.0 27.3 28.7 30.0 26.9 28.2 29.5 30.9 32.2 33.5 34.8
31.6 7.2 11.6 16.0 20.4 24.8 29.2 33.6 9.3 13.7 18.1 22.5 26.9 31.3 35.7

23.9 22.2 23.3 24.4 25.5 26.7 27.8 28.9 27.2 28.3 29.4 30.5 31.6 32.7 33.8
30.7 7.1 11.4 15.7 20.0 24.3 28.5 32.8 9.3 13.5 17.8 22.1 26.4 30.7 35.0
25.4 23.8 24.9 26.0 27.1 28.2 29.2 30.3 28.8 29.9 30.9 32.0 33.1 34.2 35.2
32.1 8.7 13.0 17.2 21.5 25.8 30.0 34.3 10.9 15.1 19.4 23.7 27.9 32.2 36.4

22.9 20.6 21.7 22.8 23.9 25.1 26.2 27.3 25.0 26.1 27.2 28.4 29.5 30.6 31.7
29.6 5.5 9.8 14.1 18.4 22.7 27.0 31.3 7.1 11.4 15.7 20.0 24.3 28.6 32.9
24.3 22.2 23.3 24.4 25.5 26.6 27.7 28.7 26.6 27.7 28.8 29.9 31.0 32.1 33.2

Page 60 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

31.0 7.1 11.4 15.6 19.9 24.2 28.4 32.7 8.8 13.0 17.3 21.5 25.8 30.1 34.3

17.6 17.8 17.9 17.9 18.0 18.0 18.1 18.1 18.3 18.4 18.4 18.5 18.5 18.6 18.6

.
TD
20.4 21.1 21.1 21.1 21.2 21.2 21.3 21.3 22.0 22.1 22.1 22.2 22.2 22.3 22.3
21.2 34.9 32.9 31.0 29.0 27.0 25.0 23.1 36.7 34.8 32.8 30.8 28.8 26.9 24.9
21.0 34.0 32.1 30.3 28.4 26.5 24.7 22.8 35.8 33.9 32.1 30.2 28.3 26.5 24.6

12.9 13.1 13.1 13.2 13.2 13.3 13.3 13.3 13.5 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.7 13.7 13.8
15.0 15.6 15.6 15.7 15.7 15.8 15.8 15.8 16.4 16.5 16.5 16.6 16.6 16.6 16.7
15.8 27.6 25.9 24.2 22.5 20.8 19.1 17.4 29.1 27.4 25.7 24.0 22.3 20.6 18.9
15.6 26.8 25.2 23.6 22.0 20.4 18.8 17.1 28.4 26.8 25.2 23.5 21.9 20.3 18.7

20.9 20.1 20.7 21.2 21.8 22.3 22.9 23.4 22.7 23.2 23.8 24.3 24.9 25.4 26.0
22.9 13.8 15.5 17.2 18.9 20.6 22.3 24.0 14.9 16.6 18.3 20.0 21.7 23.4 25.2
21.5 20.7 21.3 21.8 22.4 22.9 23.5 24.0 23.3 23.9 24.4 25.0 25.5 26.0 26.6
23.5 14.4 16.1 17.8 19.5 21.2 22.9 24.6 15.5 17.2 18.9 20.6 22.3 24.1 25.8

27.8 24.5 25.9 27.3 28.7 30.1 31.5 32.9 29.6 31.0 32.4 33.8 35.2 36.6 38.0
34.5 9.2 13.8 18.4 22.9 27.5 32.1 36.7 11.4 16.0 20.6 25.2 29.7 34.3 38.9
29.3 25.9 27.3 28.7 30.1 31.5 33.0 34.4 31.0 32.4 33.8 35.2 36.6 38.0 39.5
35.9 10.6 15.2 19.8 24.4 29.0 33.5 38.1 12.8 17.4 22.0 26.6 31.2 35.8 40.4

28.0 25.9 27.1 28.3 29.5 30.7 31.9 33.1 31.0 32.2 33.4 34.6 35.8 37.0 38.2
34.9 10.3 14.8 19.3 23.7 28.2 32.7 37.2 12.5 17.0 21.5 25.9 30.4 34.9 39.4
29.4 27.5 28.7 29.9 31.0 32.2 33.3 34.5 32.6 33.8 35.0 36.1 37.3 38.5 39.6
36.4 11.9 16.4 20.8 25.3 29.7 34.1 38.6 14.2 18.6 23.0 27.5 31.9 36.4 40.8

27.2 24.5 25.7 26.9 28.2 29.4 30.6 31.8 29.1 30.3 31.5 32.7 34.0 35.2 36.4
34.1 9.0 13.4 17.9 22.4 26.9 31.4 35.8 10.7 15.1 19.6 24.1 28.6 33.1 37.5
28.6 26.1 27.3 28.5 29.7 30.9 32.0 33.2 30.7 31.9 33.1 34.3 35.5 36.6 37.8
35.6 10.6 15.0 19.5 23.9 28.4 32.8 37.3 12.3 16.7 21.2 25.6 30.1 34.5 39.0

12.9 12.9 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 13.4 13.4 13.5 13.6 13.7 13.8 13.9 13.9
24.9 9.0 11.9 14.8 17.8 20.7 23.6 26.6 10.6 13.5 16.5 19.4 22.3 25.3 28.2
25.8 22.2 23.2 24.2 25.2 26.3 27.3 28.3 24.7 25.7 26.7 27.7 28.7 29.7 30.7
31.7 14.1 17.4 20.8 24.1 27.5 30.8 34.2 16.6 19.9 23.3 26.6 30.0 33.3 36.7
15.8 15.7 15.8 15.9 16.0 16.1 16.2 16.3 16.2 16.3 16.4 16.5 16.6 16.7 16.8
27.8 11.8 14.7 17.7 20.6 23.5 26.5 29.4 13.4 16.4 19.3 22.2 25.1 28.1 31.0
28.6 25.0 26.0 27.0 28.1 29.1 30.1 31.1 27.5 28.5 29.5 30.5 31.5 32.5 33.5
34.5 16.9 20.2 23.6 26.9 30.3 33.6 37.0 19.4 22.7 26.1 29.4 32.8 36.1 39.5

Page 61 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

.
TD
Resultant
horizontal
force
Tonne
0.2
0.4
0.8
0.8

0.1
0.3
0.5
0.5

1.6
1.3
1.6
1.4

3.3
3.2
3.3
3.2

3.3
3.2
3.3
3.2

3.2
3.1
3.2

Page 62 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

3.1

0.3

.
TD
0.4
0.7
0.7

0.2
0.3
0.6
0.6

1.9
1.7
1.9
1.7

3.7
3.6
3.7
3.6

3.7
3.6
3.7
3.6

3.6
3.5
3.6
3.5

0.4
1.7
1.9
2.7
0.4
1.7
1.9
2.7

Page 63 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

ULS, FINDING DESIGN FORCES FOR PILE CAP

Summery of Forces at Pile Cap Bottom


MAXIMUM & MINIMUM REACTION OVER PILE Pile Reaction

.
TD
n n
S.N. LONGI +VE dIRECTION LONGI -VE dIRECTION Resultant
horizontal
Longitudinal Dir Transverse Dir Vertical Load Horizon
1 TO 7 8 TO 14 15 TO21 29 TO 35 36 TO 42 43 TO 49 force . +VE . -VE . +VE . -VE Max Min tal
Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne
LC-1 84.6 88.0 91.3 98.1 101.4 104.8 0.2 263.9 304.3 94.7 94.7 14.5 12.1 0.2
LC-2 89.5 96.1 102.7 116.0 122.6 129.2 0.4 288.3 367.8 109.4 109.3 17.5 12.8 0.4
LC-3 114.6 127.1 139.6 164.6 177.2 189.7 0.8 381.3 531.5 109.8 194.5 31.4 10.3 0.8
LC-4 108.9 121.3 133.8 158.7 171.1 183.6 0.8 364.0 513.4 106.0 186.4 30.2 9.8 0.8

LC-5 59.4 62.2 65.1 70.8 73.6 76.5 0.1 186.7 220.9 67.9 67.9 10.5 8.5 0.1
LC-6 62.7 68.4 74.0 85.4 91.1 96.8 0.3 205.1 273.4 79.7 79.7 13.0 9.0 0.3
LC-7 84.4 95.2 106.0 127.6 138.4 149.2 0.5 285.7 415.2 80.1 153.6 25.0 6.8 0.5
LC-8 79.9 90.7 101.4 122.9 133.7 144.4 0.5 272.1 401.0 77.3 147.0 24.1 6.4 0.5

LC-9 44.2 59.9 75.6 107.0 122.7 138.3 1.6 179.7 368.0 101.1 81.4 18.9 4.9 1.6
LC-10 73.5 79.4 85.3 97.2 103.1 109.1 1.3 238.2 309.4 124.1 58.5 19.4 5.8 1.3
LC-11 48.4 64.1 79.8 111.2 126.9 142.6 1.6 192.4 380.8 105.4 85.7 19.5 5.5 1.6
LC-12 77.7 83.6 89.6 101.5 107.4 113.4 1.4 250.9 322.2 128.3 62.7 20.0 6.4 1.4

LC-13 2.8 36.7 70.5 138.2 172.1 205.9 3.3 110.0 516.3 132.1 76.7 28.5 -3.6 3.3
LC-14 61.3 75.7 90.0 118.7 133.1 147.4 3.2 227.1 399.2 196.7 12.0 32.2 -4.4 3.2
LC-15 12.6 46.5 80.4 148.2 182.1 216.0 3.3 139.6 546.3 142.0 86.6 30.0 -2.2 3.3
LC-16 71.2 85.6 99.9 128.7 143.1 157.5 3.2 256.7 429.2 206.7 21.9 33.6 -3.0 3.2

LC-17 6.1 40.7 75.2 144.3 178.8 213.4 3.3 122.0 536.4 133.0 86.4 28.9 -2.5 3.3
LC-18 64.6 79.7 94.7 124.8 139.8 154.8 3.2 239.0 419.4 199.8 19.7 32.8 -3.6 3.2
LC-19 16.6 51.2 85.8 154.9 189.5 224.1 3.3 153.7 568.6 143.0 97.8 30.3 -0.9 3.3
LC-20 75.2 90.2 105.3 135.4 150.5 165.6 3.2 270.7 451.5 209.7 31.0 34.3 -2.0 3.2

LC-21 12.9 43.9 74.8 136.7 167.6 198.6 3.2 131.6 502.9 129.3 82.2 27.3 -1.5 3.2
LC-22 71.4 82.9 94.3 117.2 128.6 140.1 3.1 248.6 385.8 195.9 15.6 31.3 -2.7 3.1
LC-23 23.4 54.4 85.4 147.3 178.3 209.3 3.2 163.2 534.9 139.2 93.5 28.7 0.1 3.2
LC-24 81.9 93.4 104.9 127.8 139.3 150.8 3.1 280.2 417.9 205.8 26.9 32.7 -1.1 3.1

LC-25 108.0 111.6 115.1 122.2 125.8 129.3 0.3 334.7 377.3 119.7 117.7 18.1 15.3 0.3
LC-26 114.0 120.9 127.8 141.5 148.3 155.2 0.4 362.7 445.0 135.6 133.6 21.3 16.2 0.4
LC-27 139.2 151.9 164.7 190.2 202.9 215.6 0.7 455.7 608.7 136.0 218.8 34.9 14.0 0.7
LC-28 135.3 148.0 160.7 186.0 198.7 211.4 0.7 443.9 596.2 134.1 212.6 34.0 13.7 0.7

LC-29 77.1 80.1 83.2 89.4 92.5 95.5 0.2 240.4 277.4 87.3 85.3 13.3 10.9 0.2
LC-30 80.3 86.3 92.2 104.0 110.0 115.9 0.3 258.8 329.9 99.1 97.1 15.8 11.3 0.3

Page 64 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

LC-31 102.1 113.1 124.2 146.2 157.3 168.3 0.6 339.4 471.8 99.4 171.0 27.6 9.5 0.6
LC-32 99.0 110.0 120.9 142.9 153.9 164.8 0.6 329.9 461.6 98.0 165.8 26.8 9.3 0.6

LC-33 62.7 80.7 98.6 134.5 152.4 170.4 1.9 242.0 457.3 128.0 105.1 23.4 7.3 1.9

.
TD
LC-34 93.0 100.8 108.7 124.4 132.3 140.1 1.7 302.5 396.8 152.5 80.6 24.0 8.1 1.7
LC-35 66.9 84.9 102.9 138.8 156.7 174.7 1.9 254.7 470.1 132.3 109.3 24.0 7.9 1.9
LC-36 97.2 105.1 112.9 128.7 136.5 144.4 1.7 315.2 409.6 156.8 84.8 24.6 8.7 1.7

LC-37 22.7 58.4 94.0 165.3 200.9 236.6 3.7 175.1 602.8 159.2 100.1 32.9 -1.0 3.7
LC-38 83.2 98.7 114.2 145.1 160.6 176.1 3.6 296.1 481.8 226.0 33.3 36.7 -1.9 3.6
LC-39 32.6 68.2 103.9 175.3 210.9 246.6 3.7 204.7 632.8 169.2 110.0 34.4 0.4 3.7
LC-40 93.0 108.6 124.1 155.1 170.6 186.1 3.6 325.7 511.9 235.9 43.3 38.1 -0.5 3.6

LC-41 27.9 63.6 99.3 170.7 206.4 242.1 3.7 190.8 619.2 160.2 109.8 33.1 0.4 3.7
LC-42 88.4 103.9 119.5 150.5 166.1 181.6 3.6 311.8 498.3 229.0 41.0 37.2 -0.8 3.6
LC-43 38.4 74.2 109.9 181.4 217.1 252.9 3.7 222.5 651.4 170.1 121.2 34.5 2.0 3.7
LC-44 98.9 114.5 130.1 161.2 176.8 192.4 3.6 343.5 530.4 238.9 52.4 38.6 0.8 3.6

LC-45 36.5 68.7 100.8 165.0 197.1 229.2 3.6 206.0 591.3 158.3 107.5 31.8 1.6 3.6
LC-46 97.0 109.0 120.9 144.8 156.8 168.7 3.5 326.9 470.3 227.0 38.8 35.8 0.4 3.5
LC-47 47.0 79.2 111.3 175.6 207.8 239.9 3.6 237.6 623.3 168.2 118.7 33.2 3.2 3.6
LC-48 107.5 119.5 131.5 155.5 167.4 179.4 3.5 358.5 502.3 236.9 50.0 37.3 2.0 3.5

LC-49 74.7 78.1 81.6 88.6 92.1 95.6 0.4 234.4 276.4 87.1 83.1 13.4 10.4 0.4
LC-50 67.8 79.2 90.5 113.1 124.5 135.8 1.7 237.5 373.4 163.3 40.3 26.6 0.9 1.7
LC-51 90.9 108.1 125.2 159.5 176.7 193.8 1.9 324.3 530.1 163.7 121.1 28.3 9.9 1.9
LC-52 82.0 99.4 116.8 151.5 168.9 186.3 2.7 298.1 506.8 204.5 63.8 34.2 1.7 2.7
LC-53 94.4 97.8 101.3 108.3 111.8 115.3 0.4 293.5 335.5 106.8 102.8 16.3 13.2 0.4
LC-54 87.5 98.9 110.2 132.8 144.2 155.5 1.7 296.6 432.5 183.0 60.0 29.4 3.7 1.7
LC-55 110.6 127.8 144.9 179.2 196.4 213.5 1.9 383.3 589.2 183.4 140.8 31.1 12.8 1.9
LC-56 101.7 119.1 136.5 171.2 188.6 206.0 2.7 357.2 565.9 224.2 83.5 37.0 4.5 2.7

1 1 LWL HFL
Non-Seismic Seismic Case Non-Seismic Seismic Case
1 Maximum Reaction Over Pile = 31.4 Tonne 34.3 Tonne 34.9 Tonne 38.6 Tonne
2.14384 Minimum Reaction Over Pile = 6.4 Tonne -4.4 Tonne 9.3 Tonne -1.9 Tonne
Maximum Horizontal Force/ Pile = 0.8 Tonne 3.3 Tonne 0.7 Tonne 3.7 Tonne
1.413

1.06 Pile Dia = 0.257 m


3.71 Depth of pile cap = 1.5 m
3
8 Density of RCC = 2.5 t/m
Earth fill over pile cap = 0.17 m
3
Density of soil = 2 t/m

Pile cap deff = 1.413 m

1.4125
3.47 3.47

Page 65 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

CALCULATING DESIGN BM & SF AT THE FACE OF PIER SHAFT :


Lonitudinal direction(LWL) Transverse Direction(LWL) Lonitudinal direction(HFL) Transverse Direction(HFL)
Pile Nos. . +VE . -VE . +VE . -VE . +VE . -VE . +VE . -VE

.
TD
Maximum Reaction = 381.3 T 568.6 T 209.7 T 194.5 T 455.7 T 651.4 T 238.9 T 218.8 T
Distance from c/Lpile to face of Pier shaft = 2.470 m 2.470 m 1.144 m 1.144 m 2.470 m 2.470 m 1.144 m 1.144 m

Dia of Pile = 0.273 m 0.273 m 0.273 m 0.273 m 0.273 m 0.273 m 0.273 m 0.273 m
Effective portion of Pile = 0.273 m 0.273 m 0.273 m 0.273 m 0.273 m 0.273 m 0.273 m 0.273 m
Effective force from Pile = 381.32 T 568.6 T 209.70 T 194.52 T 455.73 T 651.4 T 238.92 T 218.82 T
Effective force from Pile / m = 47.7 tm/m 71.1 tm/m 26.2 tm/m 24.3 tm/m 57.0 tm/m 81.4 tm/m 29.9 tm/m 27.4 tm/m
Lever arm from face of Pier shaft = 2.46967 m 2.46967 m 1.14384 m 1.14384 m 2.46967 m 2.46967 m 1.14384 m 1.14384 m
Moment at the face of Pier shaft/m = 117.7 tm/m 175.5 tm/m 30.0 tm/m 27.8 tm/m 140.7 tm/m 201.1 tm/m 34.2 tm/m 31.3 tm/m

Dowanward moment due to selfweight of pile cap & earth fill


2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Weight of pile cap = 3.75 T/m 3.75 T/m 3.75 T/m 3.75 T/m 3.75 T/m 3.75 T/m 3.75 T/m 3.75 T/m
Load Factor = 1.35
Factored weight of pile cap = 5.06 T/m2 5.06 T/m
2
5.06 T/m
2
5.06 T/m
2
5.06 T/m
2
5.06 T/m
2
5.06 T/m
2
5.06 T/m
2

Downward Force = 17.57 T/m 17.57 T/m 10.85 T/m 10.85 T/m 17.57 T/m 17.57 T/m 10.85 T/m 10.85 T/m
Lever arm from face of pier shaft = 1.734835 m 1.734835 m 1.07192 m 1.07192 m 1.734835 m 1.73483 m 1.07192 m 1.07192 m
Dowanward moment = 30.47 Tm/m 30.47 Tm/m 11.63 Tm/m 11.63 Tm/m 30.47 Tm/m 30.47 Tm/m 11.63 Tm/m 11.63 Tm/m

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Weight of soil over pile cap = 0.34 T/m 0.34 T/m 0.34 T/m 0.34 T/m 0.34 T/m 0.34 T/m 0.34 T/m 0.34 T/m
Load Factor = 1.35
Factored weight of pile cap = 0.459 T/m2 0.459 T/m2 0.459 T/m2 0.459 T/m2 0.459 T/m2 0.459 T/m2 0.459 T/m2 0.459 T/m2
Downward Force = 1.59 T/m 1.59 T/m 0.98 T/m 0.98 T/m 1.59 T/m 1.59 T/m 0.98 T/m 0.98 T/m
Lever arm from face of pier shaft = 1.73 m 1.73 m 1.07 m 1.07 m 1.73 m 1.73 m 1.07 m 1.07 m
Dowanward moment = 2.76 Tm/m 2.76 Tm/m 1.05 Tm/m 1.05 Tm/m 2.76 Tm/m 2.76 Tm/m 1.05 Tm/m 1.05 Tm/m

Total factored downward Shear Force = 19.16 T/m 19.16 T/m 11.84 T/m 11.84 T/m 19.16 T/m 19.16 T/m 11.84 T/m 11.84 T/m
Total factored downward BM = 33.24 Tm/m 33.24 Tm/m 12.69 Tm/m 12.69 Tm/m 33.24 Tm/m 33.24 Tm/m 12.69 Tm/m 12.69 Tm/m

Net Factored Design SF = 28.51 T/m 51.91 T/m 14.38 T/m 12.48 T/m 37.81 T/m 62.26 T/m 18.03 T/m 15.51 T/m
Net Factored Design BM = 84.5 Tm/m 142.28 Tm/m 17.29 Tm/m 15.12 Tm/m 107.45 Tm/m 167.84 Tm/m 21.47 Tm/m 18.60 Tm/m

Design SF = 62.26 T/m Design SF = 18.03 T/m


Design BM = 167.84 Tm/m Design BM = 21.47 Tm/m

CALCULATING DESIGN SHEAR FORCE AT deff FROM FACE OF PIER SHAFT :


Longitudinal Direction (LWL) Tranverse Direction(LWL) Longitudinal Direction (HFL) Tranverse Direction(HFL)
Pile Nos. 1+2+3 4+5+6 1+4 3+6 1+2+3 4+5+6 1+4 3+6

Maximum Reaction = 381.3 T 568.6 T 209.7 T 194.5 T 455.7 T 651.4 T 238.9 T 218.8 T
Distance from c/L pile to deff section = 1.05717 m 1.05717 m -0.2687 m -0.2687 m 1.05717 m 1.05717 m -0.2687 m -0.2687 m
Dia of Pile = 0.273 m 0.273 m 0.273 m 0.273 m 0.273 m 0.273 m 0.273 m 0.273 m
Effective portion of Pile = 0.273 m 0.273 m -0.1322 m -0.1322 m 0.273 m 0.273 m -0.1322 m -0.1322 m
Effective force from Pile = 381.3 T 568.56 T -101.5 T -94.2 T 455.7 T 651.36 T -115.7 T -105.9 T
Effective SF force from Pile / m = 47.7 T/m 71.07 T/m -12.7 T/m -11.8 T/m 57.0 T/m 81.42 T/m -14.5 T/m -13.2 T/m

Page 66 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Dowanward moment due to selfweight of pile cap & earth fill


Factored weight of pile cap /m2 = 5.06 T/m
2
5.06 T/m
2
5.06 T/m
2
5.06 T/m
2
5.06 T/m
2
5.06 T/m
2
5.06 T/m
2
5.06 T/m
2

.
Downward Shear Force = 10.41 T/m 10.41 T/m 3.70 T/m 3.70 T/m 0.00 T/m 10.41 T/m 3.70 T/m 3.70 T/m

TD
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Factored weight of pile cap = 0.459 T/m 0.459 T/m 0.459 T/m 0.459 T/m 0.459 T/m 0.459 T/m 0.459 T/m 0.459 T/m
Downward Shear Force = 0.94 T/m 0.94 T/m 0.34 T/m 0.34 T/m 0.94 T/m 0.94 T/m 0.34 T/m 0.34 T/m

Total factored downward SF = 11.36 tm/m 11.36 tm/m 4.04 tm/m 4.04 tm/m 0.94 tm/m 11.36 tm/m 4.04 tm/m 4.04 tm/m

Net Factored Design SF = 36.31 tm/m 59.71 tm/m 0.00 tm/m 0.00 tm/m 56.02 tm/m 70.06 tm/m 0.00 tm/m 0.00 tm/m

Design SF = 70.06 T/m Design SF = 0.00

Page 67 of 139
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

DESIGN OF PILE CAP :


(ULS) CHECK FOR BENDING MOMENT
Design Bending Moment MED = 167.84 Tm

NONE
D = 1.5 m */ overall depth at face of support
d = 1.413 m */ deff at face of support
1.5
Clear Cover = 75 mm

Ast Provided = 25  @ 100 c/c


+ 0  @ 100 c/c
2
= 4908.74 mm /m

.
= 0.348 %

TD
fyk = 500 Mpa
Grade of Concrete fck = 35 Mpa uk = 0.0045
Grade of steel fyk = 500 Mpa ud = 0.0041
fck = 35 Mpa
xu = 0.87 fyk Ast / 0.362 fck b cu2 = 0.0035
= 168.532 mm xumax/d = 0.464

xumax = 0.464 d'


= 654.801 mm UNDER REINFORCED

Ast calculated = M/ 0.87 fyk (d'-0.416 xu)

2
= 2874.34 mm /m

Ast minimum = 0.15% * b*d


2
= 2118.75 mm /m

Ast required = Max( 2874.34 , 2118.75 )


2 2
= 2874.34 mm /m < 4908.74 mm /m OK

Calculation of Top reinforcement for pile cap :

0.12 % reinforcement shall be provided at the top in both the directions


In either direction,
pt = 0.06
d = 1415 mm
Ast = 0.06 x 1415 x 1000/100
= 849 mm2/m
Provide 12 @ 100
mm dia mm c/c
Ast provided = 1130.973355 mm2/m
Hence Ok

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 68 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

(SLS) CHECK FOR STRESSES (RARE & QUASI PERMANENT LOAD COMBINATIONS)

Design Bending Moment MRARE = 108.61 Tm


MQP = 74.48 Tm
MST = MRARE - MQP (Bending Moment due to short term loading)
= 34.12 Tm
Modulus of Elasticity for Concrete
For short term loading Ecm = 32308.2 Mpa
Creep coefficent  = 1
For long term loading Ecm' = 16154.1 Mpa

2
Reinf. modulus of elasticity Es = 200000 N/mm

.
D
LT
Modular ratio for QP Combination = Es / Ecm' = 12.3807

Equavelent Modulus of Elasticity for Rare Combination :

T.
Ec,eq = Ecm*(MQP+MST) = 19164.8 MPa

PV
MST +(1+)* MQP

Modular ratio for Rare Combination = Es/ Ec,eq = 10.44

S
EM
Formula used for calculation of stress
dc (depth of neutral axis) = -m*As +  ( m2 * As2 + 2* m*As*b* d )

INA (Transformed) =
b ST
b *dc3/3 + m* As *(d-dc)2
SY

Compressive stress in concrete c = MRARE* dc / INA


Tensile stress in steel s m* MRARE* (d - dc ) / INA
G

=
IN
R

Description Stress Check For Rare Combination Stress Check For QP Combination
EE

Design Moment = 108.61 Tm = 74.48 Tm


Total Depth at section = 1.5 m = 1.5 m
IN

deff = 1.4125 m = 1.4125 m


width b = 1m = 1m
G

2 2
Ast, provided = 4908.74 mm /m = 4908.74 mm /m
EN

Modular ratio = 10.44 = 12.38


dc (depth of neutral axis) = 332.62 mm = 358.01 mm
mm4 mm4
IL

INA (Transformed) = 7.20E+10 = 8.29E+10


IV

2 2
Compressive stress in concrete c = 5.02 N/mm = 3.22 N/mm
C

2 2
Permissible Compressive stress = 16.8 N/mm OK = 12.6 N/mm OK
A

2 2
Tensile stress in steel s = 169.98 N/mm = 117.34 N/mm
D

2 2
Permissible tensile stress = 300 N/mm OK = 400 N/mm OK
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 69 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

(SLS) CHECK FOR CRACK WIDTH (QUASI PERMANENT LOAD COMBINATIONS)


Minimum Reinforcement for crack control :
As,min = kc k fct,eff Act / s ( IRC 112 / clause 12.3.3 (2) )
For Web
kc = 0.4 For Bending member

h = 1.5 m , b = 1m
k = 0.65

fcteff = fctm
= 2.77 Mpa

.
Act =

TD
Area of concrete within tensile zone just before the first crack form, section behaves
elastically until the tensile fiber stress reaches fctm. hence Neutral axis depth will be
considered for gross section
Act = b * h/2
2
= 0.75 m

s = Maximum stress permitted in reinf. Immediately after formation of crack


= fyk
= 500 Mpa

2 2
Asmin = 1080.79 mm /m < 4908.74 mm /m OK

Calculation of crack width : ( IRC 112 / clause 12.3.4)


wk,max = 0.2 mm

Clear cover c = 75 mm
Bar dia eq = 25.00 mm
5 (c +eq/2) = 437.5 mm

Spacing b/w bars = 100 mm < 437.5 mm


The Following formula can be used for
srmax = Maximum crack spacing calculation of maximum crack spacing.
= 3.4c + 0.17Peff
= 444.394 mm

hc,eff = Min 2.5 ( h - d ) h = 1.5 m


( h - x/3 ) d = 1.413 m
h/2 x = 0.35801 m */ (for Quasi Permanent Load
= 0.21875 m combination)

width b = 1m

2
Ac,eff = hc,eff *b = 0.21875 m

P,eff = As/ Ac,eff


= 4908.74 / 218750
= 0.02244

sc = Stress in tension Reinforcement assuming cracked section


= 117.34 Mpa */ (for Quasi Permanent Load combination)

Es = 200000 Mpa
Ecm' = 16154.1 Mpa */ (for Long term loading)
e = Es/Ecm
e = 12.3807
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 70 of 139
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

kt = 0.5 (factor dependent on duration of load)

sm - cm = Max sc - kt fct,eff ( 1+ e P,eff ) / P,eff


Es
0.6 sc / Es

= 0.00035

wk = srmax ( sm - cm )


= 0.156 mm < 0.200 mm OK

.
TD
(ULS) CHECK FOR SHEAR FORCE (Section At deff from face of Support)
Factored Shear Force VED = 70.06 T/m

Reduction in Design Shear For Within Zone ( av = 0.5d to 2d)


av = 1.4125 m

Reduction factor 1 = av/2d


= 0.5

Design Shear Force V NS' = 1 * VNS


= 35.03 Tonne

Max Shear Capacity of section


 = 0.6 * ( 1- fck /310) */ fck in Mpa
= 0.53226

fcd = 0.447 *fck


= 15.63 Mpa

VRDC, max = 0.5 bw d  fcd


= 587.668 Tonne > 35.03 Tonne OK

D = 1.500 m */ overall depth at face of support


d = 1.413 m */ deff at face of support

Check for Design Shear Reinforcement :


k = Min 1 + √ 200/d d is depth in mm
2
k = 1.37629

1 = Min Asl /bw d


0.02
1 = 0.00348

cp = 0 Mpa

min = 0.031 k 3/2 fck1/2


= 0.29611

0.33
VRdc = Max ( 0.12 k (80 1 fck ) + 0.15 cp ) bw d ( IRC 112 / clause 10.3.2 (2) )
(min +0.15cp ) bw d

= 49.4271 Tonne > 35.03 Tonne NO SHEAR REINFORCEMENT REQUIRED

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 71 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

DESIGN OF PILE CAP IN TRANSVERSE DIRECTION :


(ULS) CHECK FOR BENDING MOMENT
Design Bending Moment MED = 21.47 Tm

D = 1.5 m */ overall depth at face of support NONE


d = 1.415 m */ deff at face of support
1.5
Clear Cover = 75 mm

Ast Provided = 20  @ 100 c/c


+ 0  @ 100 c/c
2

.
= 3141.59 mm /m

D
= 0.222 %

LT
Grade of Concrete fck = 35 Mpa fyk = 500 Mpa

T.
Grade of steel fyk = 500 Mpa uk = 0.0045

PV
ud = 0.0041
xu = 0.87 fyk Ast / 0.362 fck b fck = 35 Mpa
= 107.861 mm cu2 = 0.0035

S
xumax/d = 0.464

EM
xumax = 0.464 d'
= 655.96 mm UNDER REINFORCED

Ast calculated = M/ 0.87 fyk (d'-0.416 xu)


ST
SY
2
= 360.268 mm /m
G

Ast minimum = 0.15% * b*d


IN

2
= 2122.5 mm /m
R

Ast required = Max( 360.268 , 2122.5 )


EE

2 2
= 2122.5 mm /m < 3141.59 mm /m OK
IN

Calculation of Top reinforcement for pile cap :


G

0.12 % reinforcement shall be provided at the top in both the directions


EN

In either direction,
pt = 0.06
d = 1415 mm
IL

Ast = 0.06 x 1415 x 1000/100


IV

= 849 mm2/m
Provide 12 @ 100
C

mm dia mm c/c
Ast provided = 1130.973355 mm2/m
A

Hence Ok
D
R

Calculation of horizontal ties for resisting busting in pile cap :

Provide 12 @ 125
mm dia mm c/c
As per fig 6.11, section A-A of SP 34

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 72 of 139


141
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

(SLS) CHECK FOR STRESSES (RARE & QUASI PERMANENT LOAD COMBINATIONS)

Design Bending Moment MRARE = 12.61 Tm


MQP = 4.63 Tm
MST = MRARE - MQP (Bending Moment due to short term loading)
= 7.98 Tm
Modulus of Elasticity for Concrete
For short term loading Ecm = 32308.2 Mpa
Creep coefficent  = 1
For long term loading Ecm' = 16154.1 Mpa

.
2
Reinf. modulus of elasticity Es = 200000 N/mm

D
LT
Modular ratio for QP Combination = Es / Ecm' = 12.3807

T.
Equavelent Modulus of Elasticity for Rare Combination :
Ec,eq = Ecm*(MQP+MST) = 23629.8 MPa

PV
MST +(1+)* MQP

S
Modular ratio for Rare Combination = Es/ Ec,eq = 8.46

EM
Formula used for calculation of stress
-m*As +  ( m2 * As2 + 2* m*As*b* d )
dc (depth of neutral axis) =
b ST
INA (Transformed) = b *dc3/3 + m* As *(d-dc) 2
SY

Compressive stress in concrete c = MRARE* dc / INA


G

Tensile stress in steel s = m* MRARE* (d - dc ) / I NA


IN
R

Stress Check For Rare


EE

Description Combination Stress Check For QP Combination


Design Moment = 12.61 Tm = 4.63 Tm
IN

Total Depth at section = 1.5 m = 1.5 m


deff = 1.415 m = 1.415 m
G

width b = 1m = 1m
2 2
EN

Ast, provided = 3141.59 mm /m = 3141.59 mm /m


Modular ratio = 8.46 = 12.38
dc (depth of neutral axis) = 249.01 mm = 295.15 mm
IL

INA (Transformed) = 4.13E+10 mm4 = 5.73E+10 mm4


IV

2 2
Compressive stress in concrete c = 0.76 N/mm = 0.24 N/mm
C

2 2
Permissible Compressive stress = 16.8 N/mm OK = 12.6 N/mm OK
A
D

2 2
Tensile stress in steel s = 30.13 N/mm = 11.20 N/mm
R

2 2
Permissible tensile stress = 300 N/mm OK = 300 N/mm OK

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 73 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

(SLS) CHECK FOR CRACK WIDTH (QUASI PERMANENT LOAD COMBINATIONS)


Minimum Reinforcement for crack control :
As,min = kc k fct,eff Act / s ( IRC 112 / clause 12.3.3 (2) )
For Web
kc = 0.4 For Bending member

h = 1.5 m , b = 1m
k = 0.65

fcteff = fctm
= 2.77 Mpa

.
TD
Act = Area of concrete within tensile zone just before the first crack form, section behaves
elastically until the tensile fiber stress reaches fctm. hence Neutral axis depth will be
considered for gross section
Act = b * h/2
2
= 0.75 m

s = Maximum stress permitted in reinf. Immediately after formation of crack


= fyk
= 500 Mpa

2 2
Asmin = 1080.79 mm /m < 3141.59 mm /m OK

Calculation of crack width : ( IRC 112 / clause 12.3.4)


wk,max = 0.2 mm

Clear cover c = 75 mm
Bar dia eq = 20.00 mm
5 (c +eq/2) = 425 mm

Spacing b/w bars = 100 mm < 425 mm


The Following formula can be used for
srmax = Maximum crack spacing calculation of maximum crack spacing.
= 3.4c + 0.17Peff
= 484.979 mm

hc,eff = Min 2.5 ( h - d ) h = 1.5 m


( h - x/3 ) d = 1.415 m
h/2 x = 0.29515 m */ (for Quasi Permanent Load
= 0.2125 m combination)

width b = 1m

2
Ac,eff = hc,eff *b = 0.2125 m

P,eff = As/ Ac,eff


= 3141.59 / 212500
= 0.01478

sc = Stress in tension Reinforcement assuming cracked section


= 11.20 Mpa */ (for Quasi Permanent Load combination)

Es = 200000 Mpa
Ecm' = 16154.1 Mpa */ (for Long term loading)

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 74 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

e = Es/Ecm
e = 12.3807

kt = 0.5 (factor dependent on duration of load)

sm - cm = Max sc - kt fct,eff ( 1+ e P,eff ) / P,eff


Es
0.6 sc / Es

= 3.4E-05

.
TD
wk = srmax ( sm - cm )
= 0.016 mm < 0.2 mm OK

(ULS) CHECK FOR SHEAR FORCE (Section At deff from face of Support)
Factored Shear Force VED = 0.00 T/m

Reduction in Design Shear For Within Zone ( av = 0.5d to 2d)


av = 1.415 m

Reduction factor 1 = av/2d


= 0.5

Design Shear Force VNS' = 1 * VNS


= 0.00 Tonne

Max Shear Capacity of section


 = 0.6 * ( 1- fck /310) */ fck in Mpa
= 0.53226

fcd = 0.447 *fck


= 15.63 Mpa

VRDC, max = 0.5 bw d  fcd


= 588.708 Tonne > 0.00 Tonne OK

D = 1.500 m */ overall depth at face of support


d = 1.415 m */ deff at face of support

Check for Design Shear Reinforcement :


k = Min 1 + √ 200/d d is depth in mm
2
k = 1.37596

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 75 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

1 = Min Asl /bw d


0.02
1 = 0.00222

cp = 0 Mpa

min = 0.031 k3/2 fck1/2


= 0.296

VRdc = Max ( 0.12 k (80 1 fck )0.33 + 0.15 cp ) bw d ( IRC 112 / clause 10.3.2 (2) )
(min +0.15cp ) bw d

.
TD
= 42.699 Tonne > 0.00 Tonne NO SHEAR REINFORCEMENT REQUIRED

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 76 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Check For Punching Shear :


A) Check at Control Perimeter 2d 0.75
Pile cap thickness d = 1.5 m 4.91
3
Density of RCC = 2.5 t/m
3

Grade of Concrete fck = 35 Mpa 3.8785 0.257


fcd = 15.6 Mpa
0.75
VEd.red = VEd - VED

.
VEd = 40.81 Tonne

TD
3.8785
Down ward weight of pile cap
= 49.20 Tonne Unfactored
Load factor = 1.35

VED = 66.43 Tonne

VEd.red = -25.62 Tonne

vEd.red = VEd.red / ud

u = Length of perimeter
= 6.41 m

2
vEd.red = -0.027 N/mm

K = 1+  200/d ≤ 2
= 1.365

min = 0.031 * K 3/2 fck 1/2


min = 0.293

vRd = Max 0.12 K (80 l fck )1/3 *2d/a


min * 2d/a

a = 3m

ly = 0.3475 %
lz = 0.222 %
l = ly *lz
= 0.278 %

vRd = Max 1.5065 Mpa


0.293 Mpa

= 1.507 Mpa

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 77 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

vRdmax = 1/2 *  *fcd


 = 0.6 [ 1- fck/310 ]
= 0.53226

vRdmax = 4.16 Mpa

Check
vEd.red < vRdc
-0.027 Mpa < 1.51 Mpa OK

.
TD
B) Check at face of pile
VEd.red = VEd - VED
VEd = 40.8073 Tonne

vEd = VEd.red / uo d
uo = 0.807 m

vEd = 0.337 Mpa

Check
vEd < vRd.max
0.337 Mpa < 4.16 Mpa OK

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 78 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

PILE Intraction Diagram

Pile Dia D = 257 mm

Clear cover = 50 mm
0.257 Dia of bar = 32 mm
Nos. of Bars = 4 Nos
Effective cover = 82 mm
Reinf Circular dia = 93.0 mm
Spacing = 73.0 mm 1 layer
2

.
Area of steel provided = 3217.0 mm

TD
Material Properties:
fck = 40 N/mm2 % steel provided = 6.2 %
fyk = 500 N/mm2
2
Es = 200000 N/mm Minimum % steel = 0.4 % OK

250

INTERACTION DIAGRAM (Pu : Mu)


200
Pu Mu
xu/D
T Tm 150
1E-09 -139.9 0.0 1E-09
Pu ( T )

100
0.2 -128.7 1.0 0.2
0.4 -26.5 4.1 0.4 50
0.6 79.3 3.8 0.6
0.8 142.6 2.9 0.8 0
0 1 2 3 4 5
1 181.5 1.7 1
‐50
1.2 194.3 1.0 1.2
1.4 201.3 0.6 1.4 ‐100
1.6 205.6 0.4 1.6
1.8 208.0 0.2 1.8 ‐150

2 209.4 0.1 2 ‐200


Mu (Tm)

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 79 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

.
ULS, CHECK FOR PILE MOMENT CAPACITY :

TD
Design Shear Resitance ( IRC 112 / clause 10.3.2 (2) )
k = Min 1 + √ 200/d d is depth in mm
2
k = 1.882

0.257 1 = Min Asl /bw d


0.02
2
Asl = 1930.19 mm */ Reinforcement on tension face
1 = 0.0200 *(60% reinforcement is considered in the
tension zone)
cp = Axial stress

L1 + Lf LWL = 1.035 m min = 0.031 k3/2 fck1/2


L1 + Lf HFL = 1.035 m = 0.506
Moment reduction factor m = 0.82
VRdc = Max ( 0.12 k (80 1 fck )0.33 + 0.15 cp ) bw d
(min +0.15cp ) bw d

Max Shear Capacity


fck = 40 Mpa  = 0.6 * ( 1- fck /310) */ fck in Mpa
fcd = 17.9 Mpa = 0.523
fyd = 434.8 Mpa
Ac = 51874.8 mm2 VRDC, max = 0.5 bw d  fcd
2
Ashear = 34756.1 mm = 16.23 Tonne
2
As (Total Reinf) = 3216.99 mm

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 80 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

.
TD
250

INTERACTION DIAGRAM (Pu : Mu)


200 CAPACITY

150 Max_Vertical_load
Pu ( T )

100 Min_vertical_load

50

0
0 1 2 3 4 5

‐50

‐100

‐150

‐200
Mu (Tm)

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 81 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

.
ULS Forces at Pile Top Level : ( SHEAR CAPACITY

TD
LC Pile Reaction Moment MED Moment MRD (LONGITUDINAL DIR )
n

Vertical Load From Intraction Ckeck


Horizont cp =
M = Q (L1 + Max Check ( NED/AC VRdc HL <
Max Min al
Lf)/2*m NED Min NED MED< VRdc
2
Tonne Tonne Tonne Tm Tm M RD ) N/mm Tonne
LC-1 14.49 12.08 0.20 0.09 3.9 4.0 OK 2.79 3.22 OK
LC-2 17.52 12.78 0.40 0.17 3.9 3.9 OK 3.38 3.52 OK
LC-3 31.36 10.32 0.79 0.33 3.9 4.0 OK 6.05 4.91 OK
LC-4 30.19 9.81 0.78 0.33 3.9 4.0 OK 5.82 4.79 OK

LC-5 10.52 8.48 0.14 0.06 4.0 4.0 OK 2.03 2.82 OK


LC-6 13.02 8.95 0.28 0.12 3.9 4.0 OK 2.51 3.07 OK
LC-7 25.02 6.81 0.55 0.23 3.9 4.0 OK 4.82 4.27 OK
LC-8 24.07 6.44 0.54 0.23 3.9 4.0 OK 4.64 4.18 OK

LC-9 18.93 4.91 1.57 0.67 3.9 4.0 OK 3.65 3.66 OK


LC-10 19.42 5.81 1.32 0.56 3.9 4.0 OK 3.74 3.71 OK
LC-11 19.54 5.51 1.57 0.67 3.9 4.0 OK 3.77 3.72 OK
LC-12 20.03 6.42 1.37 0.58 3.9 4.0 OK 3.86 3.77 OK

LC-13 28.54 3.56 3.31 1.40 3.9 4.0 OK 5.50 4.63 OK


LC-14 32.21 -4.43 3.18 1.35 3.9 4.0 OK 6.21 5.00 OK
LC-15 29.97 -2.15 3.31 1.40 3.9 4.0 OK 5.78 4.77 OK
LC-16 33.64 -3.03 3.18 1.35 3.9 4.0 OK 6.48 5.14 OK

LC-17 28.87 -2.45 3.35 1.42 3.9 4.0 OK 5.57 4.66 OK


LC-18 32.83 -3.62 3.24 1.37 3.9 4.0 OK 6.33 5.06 OK
LC-19 30.30 -0.85 3.35 1.42 3.9 4.0 OK 5.84 4.81 OK
LC-20 34.26 -2.02 3.24 1.37 3.9 4.0 OK 6.60 5.20 OK

LC-21 27.31 -1.52 3.17 1.35 3.9 4.0 OK 5.26 4.50 OK


LC-22 31.25 -2.67 3.13 1.33 3.9 4.0 OK 6.02 4.90 OK
LC-23 28.74 0.08 3.17 1.35 3.9 4.0 OK 5.54 4.65 OK
LC-24 32.68 -1.08 3.13 1.33 3.9 4.0 OK 6.30 5.04 OK

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 82 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

.
TD
LC-25 18.11 15.29 0.27 0.11 3.9 3.9 OK 3.49 3.58 OK
LC-26 21.33 16.15 0.41 0.17 3.9 3.9 OK 4.11 3.90 OK
LC-27 34.90 13.96 0.71 0.30 3.9 3.9 OK 6.73 5.27 OK
LC-28 33.99 13.72 0.70 0.30 3.9 3.9 OK 6.55 5.18 OK

LC-29 13.35 10.87 0.25 0.11 3.9 4.0 OK 2.57 3.10 OK


LC-30 15.85 11.34 0.31 0.13 3.9 4.0 OK 3.06 3.35 OK
LC-31 27.57 9.48 0.62 0.27 3.9 4.0 OK 5.32 4.53 OK
LC-32 26.82 9.30 0.62 0.26 3.9 4.0 OK 5.17 4.46 OK

LC-33 23.42 7.32 1.90 0.80 3.9 4.0 OK 4.51 4.11 OK


LC-34 24.04 8.14 1.75 0.74 3.9 4.0 OK 4.63 4.18 OK
LC-35 24.03 7.92 1.90 0.80 3.9 4.0 OK 4.63 4.17 OK
LC-36 24.65 8.74 1.75 0.74 3.9 4.0 OK 4.75 4.24 OK

LC-37 32.93 -0.98 3.72 1.58 3.9 4.0 OK 6.35 5.07 OK


LC-38 36.70 -1.87 3.61 1.53 3.9 4.0 OK 7.08 5.45 OK
LC-39 34.36 0.42 3.72 1.58 3.9 4.0 OK 6.62 5.21 OK
LC-40 38.13 -0.47 3.61 1.53 3.9 4.0 OK 7.35 5.59 OK

LC-41 33.08 0.39 3.73 1.58 3.9 4.0 OK 6.38 5.08 OK


LC-42 37.15 -0.80 3.65 1.55 3.9 4.0 OK 7.16 5.49 OK
LC-43 34.51 1.99 3.73 1.58 3.9 4.0 OK 6.65 5.23 OK
LC-44 38.58 0.80 3.65 1.55 3.9 4.0 OK 7.44 5.64 OK

LC-45 31.78 1.59 3.55 1.51 3.9 4.0 OK 6.13 4.95 OK


LC-46 35.84 0.42 3.55 1.50 3.9 4.0 OK 6.91 5.36 OK
LC-47 33.21 3.19 3.55 1.51 3.9 4.0 OK 6.40 5.10 OK
LC-48 37.27 2.01 3.55 1.50 3.9 4.0 OK 7.18 5.51 OK

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 83 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

.
TD
LC-49 13.45 10.38 0.37 0.16 3.9 4.0 OK 2.59 3.11 OK
LC-50 26.57 0.90 1.73 0.73 3.9 4.0 OK 5.12 4.43 OK
LC-51 28.28 9.95 1.95 0.83 3.9 4.0 OK 5.45 4.60 OK
LC-52 34.18 1.67 2.69 1.14 3.9 4.0 OK 6.59 5.19 OK
LC-53 16.26 13.19 0.37 0.16 3.9 3.9 OK 3.13 3.39 OK
LC-54 29.38 3.72 1.73 0.73 3.9 4.0 OK 5.66 4.71 OK
LC-55 31.10 12.76 1.95 0.83 3.9 3.9 OK 5.99 4.88 OK
LC-56 37.00 4.48 2.69 1.14 3.9 4.0 OK 7.13 5.48 OK

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 84 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

SLS, FINDING REACTIONS OVER PILE

.
TD
Pile Coordinates Pile Coordinates Pile Coordinates Pile Coordinates Pile Coordinates
Sr.No L T Sr.No L T Sr.No L T Sr.No L T Sr.No L T
N = 49 Nos. 1 -3 -3 13 -2 2 25 0 0 37 2 -2 49 3 3
2 -3 -2 14 -2 3 26 0 1 38 2 -1 0 0 0
3 -3 -1 15 -1 -3 27 0 2 39 2 0 0 0 0
1 1 4 -3 0 16 -1 -2 28 0 3 40 2 1 0 0 0
5 -3 1 17 -1 -1 29 1 -3 41 2 2 0 0 0
1 6 -3 2 18 -1 0 30 1 -2 42 2 3 0 0 0
7 -3 3 19 -1 1 31 1 -1 43 3 -3 0 0 0
1 8 -2 -3 20 -1 2 32 1 0 44 3 -2 0 0 0
1 9 -2 -2 21 -1 3 33 1 1 45 3 -1
10 -2 -1 22 0 -3 34 1 2 46 3 0
1 11 -2 0 23 0 -2 35 1 3 47 3 1
8 12 -2 1 24 0 -1 36 2 -3 48 3 2
1 193.00 181.00

1
1
1

8
SLS , SUMMERY OF FORCES AT PILE CAP BOTTOM
SUMMERY OF FORCES :

S.N. Description Forces about toe


V HL HT MTT MLL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Tonne Tonne Tonne Tm Tm Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne
LC-1 LWL QP, NS LWL DL, Snow load 558.18 13.2272 0 122.576 0.06891 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 10.1 10.1 10.1 10.1 10.1
LC-2 HFL QP, NS LWL DL, Snow load 686.813 13.2272 0 122.576 0.06891 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.7 12.7 12.7 12.7 12.7

LC-3 LWL RARE, NS LWL DL, Snow load, 757.851 25.7421 0 230.83 -243.529 15.9 14.6 13.2 11.9 10.5 9.2 7.8 17.1 15.8 14.4 13.1 11.7
LC-4 LWL RARE, NS LWL DL, Snow load, 747.594 25.6115 0 229.701 -231.016 15.5 14.2 13.0 11.7 10.4 9.1 7.9 16.7 15.4 14.2 12.9 11.6
LC-5 HFL RARE, NS LWL DL, Snow load, L 886.483 29.4932 7.08887 237.275 -235.154 18.3 17.0 15.7 14.4 13.1 11.8 10.5 19.5 18.2 16.9 15.6 14.3
LC-6 HFL RARE, NS LWL DL, Snow load, L 876.227 29.3626 7.08887 236.145 -222.642 17.9 16.7 15.4 14.2 13.0 11.8 10.5 19.1 17.9 16.7 15.4 14.2

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 85 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

.
TD
Pile Reaction over Pile No.
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne
10.1 10.1 10.8 10.8 10.8 10.8 10.8 10.8 10.8 11.4 11.4 11.4 11.4 11.4 11.4 11.4 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
12.7 12.7 13.4 13.4 13.4 13.4 13.4 13.4 13.4 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.7 14.7 14.7 14.7 14.7 14.7

10.4 9.0 18.3 17.0 15.6 14.3 12.9 11.6 10.2 19.5 18.2 16.8 15.5 14.1 12.8 11.4 20.7 19.4 18.0 16.7 15.3 14.0
10.3 9.0 17.9 16.6 15.3 14.1 12.8 11.5 10.2 19.1 17.8 16.5 15.3 14.0 12.7 11.4 20.3 19.0 17.7 16.4 15.2 13.9
13.0 11.7 20.8 19.5 18.2 16.9 15.6 14.3 13.0 22.0 20.7 19.4 18.1 16.8 15.5 14.2 23.2 21.9 20.6 19.3 18.0 16.7
13.0 11.7 20.3 19.1 17.9 16.7 15.4 14.2 13.0 21.6 20.3 19.1 17.9 16.7 15.4 14.2 22.8 21.6 20.3 19.1 17.9 16.6

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 86 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

.
TD
Resultant
horizontal
35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 force
Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne
12.0 12.7 12.7 12.7 12.7 12.7 12.7 12.7 13.3 13.3 13.3 13.3 13.3 13.3 13.3 0.3
14.7 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.9 15.9 15.9 15.9 15.9 15.9 15.9 0.3

12.6 21.9 20.5 19.2 17.9 16.5 15.2 13.8 23.1 21.7 20.4 19.1 17.7 16.4 15.0 0.5
12.6 21.5 20.2 18.9 17.6 16.4 15.1 13.8 22.7 21.4 20.1 18.8 17.6 16.3 15.0 0.5
15.4 24.4 23.1 21.8 20.6 19.3 18.0 16.7 25.7 24.4 23.1 21.8 20.5 19.2 17.9 0.6
15.4 24.0 22.8 21.6 20.3 19.1 17.9 16.6 25.2 24.0 22.8 21.6 20.3 19.1 17.9 0.6

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 87 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

SLS, REACTIONS OVER PILE


Summery of Forces at Pile Cap Bottom Pile Reaction

.
D
S.N. LONGI +VE dIRECTION LONGI -VE dIRECTION horizontal Vertical Load Horizon
1 TO 7 8 TO 14 15 TO21 29 TO 35 36 TO 42 43 TO 49 . +VE . -VE . +VE . -VE Max Min tal

LT
Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne
LC-1 66.4 70.8 75.3 84.2 88.6 93.1 0.3 212.5 265.9 79.7 79.7 12.7 9.5 0.3

T.
LC-2 84.8 89.2 93.7 102.6 107.0 111.5 0.3 267.7 321.0 98.1 98.1 15.3 12.1 0.3

PV
LC-3 83.1 91.5 99.9 116.6 125.0 133.4 0.5 274.6 375.0 80.0 136.5 21.9 7.8 0.5
LC-4 81.8 90.1 98.5 115.1 123.5 131.8 0.5 270.4 370.4 80.0 133.6 21.5 7.9 0.5
LC-5 100.8 109.4 118.0 135.2 143.9 152.5 0.6 328.3 431.6 99.4 153.9 24.4 10.5 0.6

S
LC-6 99.5 108.0 116.6 133.7 142.3 150.9 0.6 324.1 426.9 99.3 151.0 24.0 10.5 0.6

EM
ST
SY
1
Pile Dia = 0.257 m
1 Depth of pile cap = 1.5 m

G
3
Density of RCC = 2.5 t/m
2.14384 Earth fill over pile cap = 0.17 m

IN
3
Density of soil = 2 t/m

R
1.06 Pile cap deff = 1.35 m

EE
3.71
8
IN
G
EN
I L

3.47 3.47
IV

8
C
A
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 88 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

CALCULATING DESIGN BM & SF AT THE FACE OF PIER SHAFT : (Quasi Permanent Load Case)
Longitudinal Direction Transverse Direction

.
D
Pile Nos. . +VE . -VE . +VE . -VE
Maximum Reaction = 267.7 T 321.0 T 98.1 T 98.1 T

LT
Distance from c/Lpile to face of Pier shaft = 2.470 m 2.470 m 1.144 m 1.144 m
Dia of Pile = 0.273 m 0.273 m 0.273 m 0.273 m

T.
Effective portion of Pile = 0.273 m 0.273 m 0.273 m 0.273 m
Effective force from Pile = 267.674 T 321.0 T 98.1242 T 98.1 T

PV
Effective force from Pile / m = 33.5 tm/m 40.1 tm/m 12.3 tm/m 12.3 tm/m
Lever arm from face of Pier shaft = 2.46967 m 2.46967 m 1.14384 m 1.14384 m
Moment at the face of Pier shaft/m = 82.6 tm/m 99.1 tm/m 14.0 tm/m 14.0 tm/m

S
EM
Dowanward moment due to selfweight of pile cap & earth fill
2 2 2 2
Weight of pile cap = 3.75 T/m 3.75 T/m 3.75 T/m 3.75 T/m
Load Factor = 1

ST
Factored weight of pile cap = 3.75 T/m2 3.75 T/m2 3.75 T/m2 3.75 T/m2
Downward Force = 13.01 T/m 13.01 T/m 8.04 T/m 8.04 T/m

SY
Lever arm from face of pier shaft = 1.73483 m 1.73483 m 1.07192 m 1.07192 m
Dowanward moment = 22.57 Tm/m 22.57 Tm/m 8.62 Tm/m 8.62 Tm/m

G
2 2 2 2
Weight of soil over pile cap = 0.34 T/m 0.34 T/m 0.34 T/m 0.34 T/m

IN
Load Factor = 1
Factored weight of pile cap = 0.34 T/m2 0.34 T/m2 0.34 T/m2 0.34 T/m2

R
Downward Force = 1.18 T/m 1.18 T/m 0.73 T/m 0.73 T/m

EE
Lever arm from face of pier shaft = 1.73 m 1.73 m 1.07 m 1.07 m
Dowanward moment = 2.05 Tm/m 2.05 Tm/m 0.78 Tm/m 0.78 Tm/m
IN
Total factored downward Shear Force = 14.19 T/m 14.19 T/m 8.77 T/m 8.77 T/m
Total factored downward BM = 24.62 Tm/m 24.62 Tm/m 9.40 Tm/m 9.40 Tm/m
G
EN

Net Factored Design SF = 19.27 T/m 25.94 T/m 3.50 T/m 3.50 T/m
Net Factored Design BM = 58.01 Tm/m 74.48 Tm/m 4.63 Tm/m 4.63 Tm/m
L

Design SF = 25.94 T/m Design SF = 3.50 T/m


I

Design BM = 74.48 Tm/m Design BM = 4.63 Tm/m


IV
C
A
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 89 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

CALCULATING DESIGN BM & SF AT THE FACE OF PIER SHAFT: (Rare Case)


Longitudinal Direction Transverse Direction

.
D
Pile Nos. . +VE . -VE . +VE . -VE
Maximum Reaction = 328.3 T 431.6 T 99.4 T 153.9 T

LT
Distance from c/Lpile to face of Pier shaft = 2.470 m 2.470 m 1.144 m 1.144 m
Dia of Pile = 0.273 m 0.273 m 0.273 m 0.273 m

T.
Effective portion of Pile = 0.273 m 0.273 m 0.273 m 0.273 m
Effective force from Pile = 328.3 T 431.6 T 99.3574 T 153.9 T

PV
Effective force from Pile / m = 41.0 tm/m 53.9 tm/m 12.4 tm/m 19.2 tm/m
Lever arm from face of Pier shaft = 2.46967 m 2.46967 m 1.14384 m 1.14384 m
Moment at the face of Pier shaft/m = 101.3 tm/m 133.2 tm/m 14.2 tm/m 22.0 tm/m

S
EM
Dowanward moment due to selfweight of pile cap & earth fill
2 2 2 2
Weight of pile cap = 3.75 T/m 3.75 T/m 3.75 T/m 3.75 T/m

ST
Load Factor = 1
Factored weight of pile cap = 3.75 T/m2 3.75 T/m2 3.75 T/m2 3.75 T/m2

SY
Downward Force = 13.01 T/m 13.01 T/m 8.04 T/m 8.04 T/m
Lever arm from face of pier shaft = 1.73483 m 1.73483 m 1.07192 m 1.07192 m
Dowanward moment = 22.57 Tm/m 22.57 Tm/m 8.62 Tm/m 8.62 Tm/m

G
IN
2 2 2 2
Weight of soil over pile cap = 0.34 T/m 0.34 T/m 0.34 T/m 0.34 T/m
Load Factor = 1

R
Factored weight of pile cap = 0.34 T/m2 0.34 T/m2 0.34 T/m2 0.34 T/m2

EE
Downward Force = 1.18 T/m 1.18 T/m 0.73 T/m 0.73 T/m
Lever arm from face of pier shaft = 1.73 m 1.73 m 1.07 m 1.07 m
Dowanward moment = 2.05 Tm/m 2.05 Tm/m 0.78 Tm/m 0.78 Tm/m
IN
Total factored downward Shear Force = 14.19 T/m 14.19 T/m 8.77 T/m 8.77 T/m
G

Total factored downward BM = 24.62 Tm/m 24.62 Tm/m 9.40 Tm/m 9.40 Tm/m
EN

Net Factored Design SF = 26.84 T/m 39.75 T/m 3.65 T/m 10.47 T/m
Net Factored Design BM = 76.73 Tm/m 108.61 Tm/m 4.81 Tm/m 12.61 Tm/m
I L

Design SF = 39.75 T/m Design SF = 10.47 T/m


IV

Design BM = 108.61 Tm/m Design BM = 12.61 Tm/m


C
A
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 90 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

.
SLS, STRESS CHECK FOR PILE :

D
Pile Dia D = 257 mm L1 + L f LWL = 1.035 m

LT
Clear cover = 50 mm L1 + Lf HFL = 1.035 m
Dia of bar = 32 mm Moment reduction factor m = 0.82

T.
0.257 Nos. of Bars = 4 Nos

PV
Effective cover = 66 mm
Reinf Circular dia = 125.00 mm
Spacing = 98.2 mm

S
Area of steel provided = 3217.0 mm2

EM
Modulus of Elasticity for Concrete

ST
Design Bending Moment MRARE = 0.22 Tm
MQP = 0.11Tm

SY
MST = MRARE - MQP (Bending Moment due to short term loading)
= 0.11 Tm

G
Modulus of Elasticity for Concrete
For short term loading Ecm = 32308.2 Mpa

IN
Creep coefficent  = 1

R
For long term loading Ecm' = 16154.1 Mpa
EE
2
Reinf. modulus of elasticity Es = 200000 N/mm
IN

Modular ratio for QP Combination = Es / Ecm = 12.381


G

Equivalent Modulus of Elasticity for Rare Combination :


EN

Ec,eq = Ecm*(MQP+MST) = 21342 MPa


MST +(1+)* MQP
L

Modular ratio for Rare Combination = Es/ Ec,eq = 9.37


I
IV
C
A
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 91 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

.
Permissible Stresses Rare Combination Quasi Permanent

D
Permissible conc. Stresses 16.8 12.6

LT
Permissible steel stresses -300 -300

T.
SLS, FORCES AT PILE TOP

PV
Forces at Pile Top Stresses in Concrete & Steel
S.N. M = Q (L1 + Modular Max Reaction Crack/u Min Reaction Crack/u
Description NED max NED min Hresultant

S
Lf)/2*m ratio c st Check ncrack c  st Check ncrack

EM
Tonne Tonne Tonne Tonne N/mm2 N/mm2 N/mm2 N/mm2
LC-1 LWL QP, NS LWL 12.7 9.5 0.3 0.1 12.38 2.6 17.0 OK Uncracke 2.2 12.4 OK Uncracked
LC-2 HFL QP, NS LWL 15.3 12.1 0.3 0.1 12.38 2.9 21.4 OK Uncracke 2.6 16.8 OK Uncracked

ST
LC-3 LWL RARE, NS LW 21.9 7.8 0.5 0.2 9.37 3.7 15.6 OK Uncracke 2.9 7.2 OK Uncracked

SY
LC-4 LWL RARE, NS LW 21.5 7.9 0.5 0.2 9.37 3.9 14.7 OK Uncracke 3.0 5.6 OK Craked
LC-5 HFL RARE, NS LW 24.4 10.5 0.6 0.3 9.37 4.4 17.4 OK Uncracke 3.6 9.3 OK Uncracked

G
LC-6 HFL RARE, NS LW 24.0 10.5 0.6 0.3 9.37 4.6 16.5 OK Uncracke 3.7 7.8 OK Craked

IN
R
EE
IN
G
EN
IL
IV
C
A
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 92 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Stress Check For Pile


Section Dimenssion and Forces
Outer dia of Column = 0.257 m
Axial Trust = 11.3 tonne
Resultant Moment = 0.3 t*m z
Clear cover = 50.0 mm
Modular Ratio m = 9.8 d1 1

Reinforcement Detail Layer 1


Circle Dia = 0.13 m
Dia of Bar = 32 mm

.
D
No of bars = 4 No.s

LT
Readjusted Spacing = 98.1748 mm
Area of Steel per m Ast/m = 8192 mm^2/m

T.
Distance of neutral axis from bottom fiber of concrete d1

PV
d1 = -0.0992 m

Concrete Effective Area properties About Prioncipal axis

S
Outer Dia

EM
a = Cos-1(d1/r) = 2.45238 Radians
= 140.511 deg

ST
2
Aeff = = 0.0486 m
SY
cgy = = 0.00749 m
G

Ix = = 0.00017 m^4
IN
R
EE

Transformed propertise
Properties of Reinforcement About Prioncipal axis About Prioncipal axis
Reinforcement in compression Layer 1 Layer 1
IN

a = Cos-1(d1/r) = 3.14159 radian


= 180 deg
G

2 2
Asc = 2*r*a*Ast/m = 0.00322 m 0.04416 m
EN

cgyc = r*sin(a)/a = 2.4E-18 m 2.4E-18 m


3 4 4
Ixc = Ast/m* r * ( cos(a )*sin(a) + a ) = 6.3E-06 m 8.6E-05 m
Reinforcement in tension
IL

2 2
Ast = As-Asc = 0m 0m
IV

Cgyt = - Asc*Cgyc/Ast = -0.0625 m -0.0625 m


4 4
Ixt = Ix - Ixc = 0m 0m
C
A
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 93 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Combined Properise of Effective Concrete + Steel compression and tension


About Principal axis centrodial axis
2 2
Aeff = 0.09276 m 0.09276 m
Cgy = 0.00392 m =e1x 0m
4 4
Ixeff = 0.00026 m 0.00026 m

ex = M/P = 0.03094 m

P = 113067 N
M = 3498.54 N*m

.
D
recalculation of position of neutral axis.

LT
T.
d1 = -0.0992  Craked

PV
Check
Stress at neutral axis must be zero

S
Stres at point y = -0.0992 m

EM
ST
 = -2E-16 N/mm^2 OK SY
Results
% steel provided = 6.20146 %
Maximum compressive stress
G

y = 0.1285 m
IN

s = 2.69196 N/m^2
Maximum tensile stress
R

y = -0.0625 m
EE

s = 4.25685 N/mm^2
IN
G
EN
IL
IV
C
A
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 94 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

UNFACTORED FORCES FOR DESIGN OF SHAFT :

.
D
LWL condition HFL Condition
For sub-structure For foundation For sub-structure For foundation

LT
Longitudinal Horizontal seismic coefficent AhL = 0.150 0.203 0.150 0.203
Transverse Horizontal seismic coefficent AhT = 0.150 0.203 0.150 0.203

T.
Vertical seismic coefficent AV = 0.100 0.135 0.100 0.135

PV
S
EM
3.25 1.5 3.25

ST
1.5

SY
G
IN
Calculating Forces @ Shaft Bottom ( Non-Seismic Component)

R
Forces & Eccentricity @ Pile cap bottom Forces & Eccentricity @ Pier Shaft Bottom

EE
S.N. Component V HL HT eY eL eT V HL HT eY eL eT MTT MLL
Tonne Tonne Tonne m m m Tonne Tonne Tonne m m m Tm Tm
IN
1 Sub-structure 67.02 5.49 0.00 0.00 67.02 3.99 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0
G
EN

*/Permanent Loads from left span


3) Super-structure DL Left span 60.00 8.97 0.00 0.00 60.00 7.47 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0
4) Snow load 22.67 9.80 0.00 0.00 22.67 8.30 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0
L

5) Surfacing Left span 0.00 9.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.82 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0
I

*/Permanent Loads from Right span


IV

3) Super-structure DL right span 60.00 8.97 0.00 0.00 60.00 7.47 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0
C

4) Snow load 22.67 9.80 0.18 0.00 22.67 8.30 0.18 0.00 4.1 0.0
5) Surfacing right span 0.00 9.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.82 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0
A
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 95 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

*/ Live load Reaction


6) Maximum Reaction case

.
D
6.1) Max React. LL left span 96.3 10.50 0.00 -1.22 96.33 9.00 0.00 -1.22 0.0 -117.5
6.2) Max Reaction LL right span 103.3 10.50 0.00 -1.22 103.34 9.00 0.00 -1.22 0.0 -126.1

LT
6) Maximum long moment case

T.
6.1) Max long moment LL left span 0 10.50 0.00 -1.22 0.00 9.00 0.00 -1.22 0.0 0.0
6.2) Max long. Moment LL right sp 189.41 10.50 0.00 -1.22 189.41 9.00 0.00 -1.22 0.0 -231.1

PV
7) Live load longitudinal forces
7.1) LL longitudinal force Maximum Reaction 25.74 8.65 25.74 7.15 184.1 0.0

S
7.2) LL longitudinal force Maximum moment 25.61 8.65 25.61 7.15 183.1 0.0

EM
7.3) Longitudinal force No Live load condition 13.23 8.65 13.23 7.15 94.6 0.0
7.4) Fongitudinal force Left span dislodge con 6.61 8.65 6.61 7.15 47.3 0.0

ST
8.1) Bouyancy (HFL) -288.16 1.09 0.00 0.00 -48.16 1.303 0 0 0.0 0.0
8.2) Bouyancy (LWL) -226.40 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.0 0.0

SY
9) Water current forces
9.1) WC 100 % in transverse direction 1.37 2.90 1.37 1.40 0.0 1.9
9.2) WC at 20% variation 1.64 1.29 2.90 1.64 1.29 1.40 2.3 1.8

G
IN
9.3 wind load Dead load 14.45 18.88 75.53 7.47 0.00 0.00 125.6 502.3
9.4 wind load live load 0.00 2.17 8.69 7.15 14.5 57.8

R
9.5 wind load sub structure 0.00 0.00 1.45 3.99 0.00 0.00 0.0 9.7

Seismic Longitudinal LWL


*/From super-structure permanent loads EE
IN
8.1) Permanent Loads Left span 0.0 0.0 0.00 -1.50 0.0 0.0
8.2) Permanent Loads Right span 33.5 8.7 24.80 7.15 177.3 0.0
G
EN

*/From super-structure Live loads longitudinal (20%)


9.1) Live Load longitudinal Left span (Pmax) 0 0.00 0.00 -1.50 0.0 0.0
9.2) Live Load Longitudinal Right span (Pmax 13.36 8.65 13.36 7.15 95.5 0.0
L

9.3) Live Load longitudinal Left span (Mmax) 0 0.00 0.00 -1.50 0.0 0.0
I

9.4) Live Load Longitudinal Right span (Mma 5.72 8.65 5.72 7.15 40.9 0.0
IV
C

11) Sub-structure Component 82.53 2.70 61.13 1.20 73.3 0.0


A

Seismic Longitudinal HFL


D

*/From super-structure permanent loads


R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 96 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

8.1) Permanent Loads Left span 0.0 0.0 0.00 -1.50 0.0 0.0
8.2) Permanent Loads Right span 33.5 8.7 24.80 7.15 177.3 0.0

.
D
*/From super-structure Live loads longitudinal (20%)

LT
9.1) Live Load longitudinal Left span (Pmax) 0 0.00 0.00 -1.50 0.0 0.0
9.2) Live Load Longitudinal Right span (Pmax 13.36 8.65 13.36 7.15 95.5 0.0

T.
9.3) Live Load longitudinal Left span (Mmax) 0 0.00 0.00 -1.50 0.0 0.0
9.4) Live Load Longitudinal Right span (Mma 5.72 8.65 5.72 7.15 40.9 0.0

PV
11) Sub-structure Component 82.53 2.70 61.13 1.20 73.3 0.0

S
EM
12) Hydrodynamic Longitudinal 5.989 0.979 5.9 0.0

Seismic Transveres LWL

ST
*/From super-structure permanent loads
12.1) Permanent Loads Left span 16.74 9.20 12.40 7.70 0.0 95.5

SY
12.2) Permanent Loads Right span 16.74 9.20 12.40 7.70 0.0 95.5

*/From super-structure Live loads comp

G
*/ Max reaction case

IN
13.1) Live Load comp. Left span 3.90138 10.50 2.89 9.00 0.0 26.0
13.2) Live Load comp. Right span 4.18526 10.50 3.10 9.00 0.0 27.9

R
*/ Max Long moment case

EE
13.1) Live Load comp. Left span 0 10.50 0.00 9.00 0.0 0.0
13.2) Live Load comp. Right span 7.67 10.50 5.68 9.00 0.0 51.1
IN
14) Sub-structure Component 82.53 2.70 61.13 1.20 0.0 73.3
G

Seismic Transveres HFL


EN

*/From super-structure permanent loads


12.1) Permanent Loads Left span 16.74 9.20 12.40 7.70 0.0 95.5
12.2) Permanent Loads Right span 16.74 9.20 12.40 7.70 0.0 95.5
I L

*/From super-structure Live loads comp


IV

*/ Max reaction case


C

13.1) Live Load comp. Left span 3.90138 10.50 2.89 9.00 0.0 26.0
13.2) Live Load comp. Right span 4.18526 10.50 3.10 9.00 0.0 27.9
A

*/ Max Long moment case


D

13.1) Live Load comp. Left span 0 10.50 0.00 9.00 0.0 0.0
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 97 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

13.2) Live Load comp. Right span 7.67 10.50 5.68 9.00 0.0 51.1

.
D
14) Sub-structure Component 82.53 2.70 61.13 1.20 0.0 73.3

LT
15) Hydrodynamic Transverse 5.99 0.98 0.0 5.9

T.
Seismic Vertical Downward LWL

PV
*/From super-structure permanent loads
15.1) Permanent Loads Left span 11.16 0.05 0.00 8.27 0.05 0.00 0.4 0.0
15.2) Permanent Loads Right span 11.16 0.05 0.00 8.27 0.05 0.00 0.4 0.0

S
EM
*/From super-structure Live loads comp
*/ Max reaction case
16.1) Live Load comp. Left span 13.00 0.00 -1.22 9.63 0.00 -1.22 0.0 -11.8

ST
16.2) Live Load comp. Right span 13.95 0.00 -1.22 10.33 0.00 -1.22 0.0 -12.6
*/ Max Long moment case

SY
16.1) Live Load comp. Left span 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0
16.2) Live Load comp. Right span 25.57 0.00 -1.22 18.94 0.00 -1.22 0.0 -23.1

G
17) Sub-structure Component 55.02 0.00 0.00 40.76 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0

IN
Seismic Vertical Downward HFL

R
*/From super-structure permanent loads

EE
15.1) Permanent Loads Left span 11.16 0.05 0.00 8.27 0.05 0.00 0.4 0.0
15.2) Permanent Loads Right span 11.16 0.05 0.00 8.27 0.05 0.00 0.4 0.0
IN
*/From super-structure Live loads comp
*/ Max reaction case
G

16.1) Live Load comp. Left span 13.00 0.00 -1.22 9.63 0.00 -1.22 0.0 -11.8
EN

16.2) Live Load comp. Right span 13.95 0.00 -1.22 10.33 0.00 -1.22 0.0 -12.6
*/ Max Long moment case
16.1) Live Load comp. Left span 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0
L

16.2) Live Load comp. Right span 25.57 0.00 -1.22 18.94 0.00 -1.22 0.0 -23.1
I
IV

17) Sub-structure Component 55.02 0.00 0.00 40.76 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0
C
A
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 98 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

ULS, SUMMERY OF FORCES AT BASE OF PIER SHAFT


SUMMERY OF FORCES :

.
D
S.N. Description FORCES @ SHAFT BOTTOM
N HL HT MTT MLL

LT
Tonne Tonne Tonne Tm Tm
LC-1 NS LWL Span dislodge case 202.084 9.9204 0 76.4397 0.03721
LC-2 NS LWL No Live load 313.688 19.8408 0 147.371 0.03721

T.
LC-3 NS LWL With LL max reaction case 613.193 38.6131 0 281.593 -365.36
LC-4 NS LWL With LL max moment case 597.809 38.4173 0 280.192 -346.59

PV
LC-5 LC-1 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 (5 191.054 69.4108 16.5451 228.83 38.0032
LC-6 LC-1 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 (5 191.054 24.2954 55.1502 97.2666 126.594

S
LC-7 LC-1 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 (50 213.114 69.4108 16.5451 229.013 38.0063
LC-8 LC-1 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 (50 213.114 24.2954 55.1502 97.4502 126.597

EM
LC-9 LC-2 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 287.908 146.758 38.6703 508.712 118.933
LC-10 LC-2 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 287.908 56.5271 128.901 245.585 396.364

ST
LC-11 LC-2 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 339.468 146.758 38.6703 509.446 118.939
LC-12 LC-2 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 339.468 56.5271 128.901 246.32 396.371

SY
LC-13 LC-3 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 326.045 148.935 39.2094 524.279 77.2564
LC-14 LC-3 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 326.045 58.7043 130.698 261.153 366.005
LC-15 LC-3 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 381.199 148.935 39.2094 525.013 72.8779

G
LC-16 LC-3 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 381.199 58.7043 130.698 261.887 361.627

IN
LC-17 LC-4 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 324.086 137.48 39.1817 442.374 79.3972
LC-18 LC-4 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 324.086 47.249 130.606 179.247 367.565

R
LC-19 LC-4 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 379.056 137.48 39.1817 443.108 75.2439

EE
LC-20 LC-4 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 379.056 47.249 130.606 179.982 363.411

LC-21 NS HFL Span dislodge case 194.86 11.5597 1.28687 78.7356 1.83951
IN
LC-22 NS HFL No Live load 306.464 21.4801 1.28687 149.666 1.83951
LC-23 NS HFL With LL max reaction case 605.969 40.2525 1.28687 283.889 -363.56
G
LC-24 NS HFL With LL max moment case 590.585 40.0566 1.28687 282.488 -344.79
EN

LC-25 LC-21 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 ( 183.83 79.0046 19.1794 269.523 41.1249


LC-26 LC-21 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 ( 183.83 31.7932 60.9285 135.908 132.794
LC-27 LC-21 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 (5 205.89 79.0046 19.1794 269.707 41.128
LC-28 LC-21 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 (5 205.89 31.7932 60.9285 136.091 132.797
I L
IV
C
A
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 99 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION
LC-29 LC-22 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 280.684 156.37 41.7538 531.058 122.495
LC-30 LC-22 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 280.684 61.9471 136.177 263.827 404.031
LC-31 LC-22 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 332.244 156.37 41.7538 531.792 122.501
LC-32 LC-22 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 332.244 61.9471 136.177 264.561 404.037

.
D
LC-33 LC-23 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 318.821 156.563 42.2929 532.439 80.8179

LT
LC-34 LC-23 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 318.821 62.1402 137.974 265.208 373.671
LC-35 LC-23 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 373.975 156.563 42.2929 533.173 76.4393
LC-36 LC-23 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 373.975 62.1402 137.974 265.942 369.293

T.
LC-37 LC-24 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 316.862 145.108 42.2652 450.534 82.9587

PV
LC-38 LC-24 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 316.862 50.6849 137.881 183.303 375.231
LC-39 LC-24 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 371.832 145.108 42.2652 451.268 78.8054
LC-40 LC-24 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 371.832 50.6849 137.881 184.037 371.077

S
LC-41 NS LWL Span dislodge case+wind load 212.709 17.1414 44.2071 119.337 286.825

EM
LC-42 NS LWL No Live load+wind load 310.824 16.9937 70.652 117.088 462.684
LC-43 NS LWL With LL max reaction case+w 515.645 32.7137 16.5913 236.354 -162.57
LC-44 NS LWL With LL max reaction succedin 594.945 57.3672 78.4772 404.781 168.095

ST
LC-45 NS HFL Span dislodge case+wind load 206.93 16.0545 39.8598 112.11 257.916
LC-46 NS HFL No Live load+wind load 305.045 18.95 78.4772 130.098 514.722
LC-47 NS HFL With LL max reaction case+wi 509.866 32.7137 16.5913 236.354 -162.57

SY
LC-48 NS HFL With LL max reaction succedin 589.166 57.3672 78.4772 404.781 168.095

G
IN
R
EE
IN
G
EN
I L
IV
C
A
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 100 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

ULS CHECK FOR PIER SHAFT :


Check For Biaxial Bending Moment

.
D
As1 NRD = Ac fcd+As fyd

LT
= 15891.3 Tonne

T=

T.
T  
5250 MEDT MEDL

PV
+ ≤ 1
As4 MEDT MRDL
L

S
As3

EM
fck = 35 Mpa
As2 fcd = 15.6 Mpa

ST
fyd = 434.8 Mpa
Ac = 7875000 mm2

SY
2
L= 1500 As = 82340.4 mm

G
IN
ULS CHECK FOR ABUTMENT SHAFT :

R
CHECK FOR MOMENT CAPACITY
Forces at bottom of abutment shaft
S.N. NED/ (MEDT /MRDT)

EE
Description MRTT MRLL
NED HL HT METT MELL NRD  +(MEDL /MRDL)
Tonne Tonne Tonne Tm Tm Tm Tm Check
IN
LC-1 NS LWL Span dislodge case 202.1 9.9 0.0 76.4 0.0 0.0 1.0 537.2 2284.9 0.1 OK
G

LC-2 NS LWL No Live load 313.7 19.8 0.0 147.4 0.0 0.0 1.0 608.3 2531.5 0.2 OK
LC-3 NS LWL With LL max reaction case 613.2 38.6 0.0 281.6 -365.4 0.0 1.0 799.3 3193.1 0.2 OK
EN

LC-4 NS LWL With LL max moment case 597.8 38.4 0.0 280.2 -346.6 0.0 1.0 789.5 3159.1 0.2 OK
L

LC-5 LC-1 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 (5 191.1 69.4 16.5 228.8 38.0 0.0 1.0 530.2 2260.5 0.4 OK
I

LC-6 LC-1 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 (5 191.1 24.3 55.2 97.3 126.6 0.0 1.0 530.2 2260.5 0.2 OK
IV

LC-7 LC-1 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 (50 213.1 69.4 16.5 229.0 38.0 0.0 1.0 544.2 2309.3 0.4 OK
C

LC-8 LC-1 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 (50 213.1 24.3 55.2 97.5 126.6 0.0 1.0 544.2 2309.3 0.2 OK
A

LC-9 LC-2 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 287.9 146.8 38.7 508.7 118.9 0.0 1.0 591.9 2474.5 0.9 OK
D

LC-10 LC-2 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 287.9 56.5 128.9 245.6 396.4 0.0 1.0 591.9 2474.5 0.6 OK
R

LC-11 LC-2 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 339.5 146.8 38.7 509.4 118.9 0.0 1.0 624.8 2588.4 0.9 OK

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 101 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

LC-12 LC-2 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 339.5 56.5 128.9 246.3 396.4 0.0 1.0 624.8 2588.4 0.5 OK

.
D
LC-13 LC-3 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 326.0 148.9 39.2 524.3 77.3 0.0 1.0 616.2 2558.7 0.9 OK

LT
LC-14 LC-3 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 326.0 58.7 130.7 261.2 366.0 0.0 1.0 616.2 2558.7 0.6 OK
LC-15 LC-3 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 381.2 148.9 39.2 525.0 72.9 0.0 1.0 651.4 2680.6 0.8 OK
LC-16 LC-3 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 381.2 58.7 130.7 261.9 361.6 0.0 1.0 651.4 2680.6 0.5 OK

T.
PV
LC-17 LC-4 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 324.1 137.5 39.2 442.4 79.4 0.0 1.0 615.0 2554.4 0.8 OK
LC-18 LC-4 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 324.1 47.2 130.6 179.2 367.6 0.0 1.0 615.0 2554.4 0.4 OK
LC-19 LC-4 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 379.1 137.5 39.2 443.1 75.2 0.0 1.0 650.0 2675.8 0.7 OK

S
LC-20 LC-4 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 379.1 47.2 130.6 180.0 363.4 0.0 1.0 650.0 2675.8 0.4 OK

EM
LC-21 NS HFL Span dislodge case 194.9 11.6 1.3 78.7 1.8 0.0 1.0 532.6 2269.0 0.1 OK
LC-22 NS HFL No Live load 306.5 21.5 1.3 149.7 1.8 0.0 1.0 603.7 2515.5 0.2 OK

ST
LC-23 NS HFL With LL max reaction case 606.0 40.3 1.3 283.9 -363.6 0.0 1.0 794.7 3177.1 0.2 OK
LC-24 NS HFL With LL max moment case 590.6 40.1 1.3 282.5 -344.8 0.0 1.0 784.9 3143.1 0.3 OK

SY
LC-25 LC-21 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 ( 183.8 79.0 19.2 269.5 41.1 0.0 1.0 525.6 2244.6 0.5 OK

G
LC-26 LC-21 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 ( 183.8 31.8 60.9 135.9 132.8 0.0 1.0 525.6 2244.6 0.3 OK
LC-27 LC-21 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 (5 205.9 79.0 19.2 269.7 41.1 0.0 1.0 539.6 2293.3 0.5 OK

IN
LC-28 LC-21 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 (5 205.9 31.8 60.9 136.1 132.8 0.0 1.0 539.6 2293.3 0.3 OK

R
LC-29 LC-22 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 280.7 156.4 41.8 482.8 122.5 0.0 1.0 587.3 2458.5 0.9 OK
LC-30
LC-31
LC-22 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3
LC-22 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3
280.7
332.2
61.9
156.4 EE
136.2
41.8
263.8
531.8
404.0
122.5
0.0
0.0
1.0
1.0
587.3
620.2
2458.5
2572.4
0.6
0.9
OK
OK
IN
LC-32 LC-22 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 332.2 61.9 136.2 264.6 404.0 0.0 1.0 620.2 2572.4 0.6 OK
G

LC-33 LC-23 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 318.8 156.6 42.3 532.4 80.8 0.0 1.0 611.6 2542.8 0.9 OK
EN

LC-34 LC-23 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 318.8 62.1 138.0 265.2 373.7 0.0 1.0 611.6 2542.8 0.6 OK
LC-35 LC-23 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 374.0 156.6 42.3 533.2 76.4 0.0 1.0 646.8 2664.6 0.9 OK
LC-36 LC-23 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 374.0 62.1 138.0 265.9 369.3 0.0 1.0 646.8 2664.6 0.5 OK
I L
IV

LC-37 LC-24 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 316.9 145.1 42.3 450.5 83.0 0.0 1.0 610.4 2538.5 0.8 OK
LC-38 LC-24 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 316.9 50.7 137.9 183.3 375.2 0.0 1.0 610.4 2538.5 0.4 OK
C

LC-39 LC-24 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 371.8 145.1 42.3 451.3 78.8 0.0 1.0 645.4 2659.9 0.7 OK
A

LC-40 LC-24 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 371.8 50.7 137.9 184.0 371.1 0.0 1.0 645.4 2659.9 0.4 OK
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 102 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

LC-41 NS LWL Span dislodge case+wind load 212.7 17.1 44.2 119.3 286.8 0.0 1.0 544.0 2308.4 0.3 OK
LC-42 NS LWL No Live load+wind load 310.8 17.0 70.7 117.1 462.7 0.0 1.0 606.5 2525.1 0.4 OK

.
D
LC-43 NS LWL With LL max reaction case+w 515.6 32.7 16.6 236.4 -162.6 0.0 1.0 737.1 2977.6 0.3 OK

LT
LC-44 NS LWL With LL max reaction succedi 594.9 57.4 78.5 404.8 168.1 0.0 1.0 787.7 3152.7 0.6 OK
LC-45 NS HFL Span dislodge case+wind load 206.9 16.1 39.9 112.1 257.9 0.0 1.0 540.3 2295.6 0.3 OK
LC-46 NS HFL No Live load+wind load 305.0 18.9 78.5 130.1 514.7 0.0 1.0 602.8 2512.4 0.4 OK

T.
LC-47 NS HFL With LL max reaction case+wi 509.9 32.7 16.6 236.4 -162.6 0.0 1.0 733.4 2964.8 0.3 OK

PV
LC-48 NS HFL With LL max reaction succedin 589.2 57.4 78.5 404.8 168.1 0.0 1.0 784.0 3140.0 0.6 OK

S
EM
ST
SY
G
IN
R
EE
IN
G
EN
I L
IV
C
A
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 103 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

INTERACTION DIAGRAM : (P : MTT) SECTION AT SHAFT BOTTOM

.
Section Dimensions: Material Properties:

D
D = 1500 mm fck = 35 N/mm2

LT
As1 B = 5250 mm fyk = 500 N/mm2
Es = 200000 N/mm2

T.
Reinforcement Details :

PV
Dia Spacing Cover From To Y_Cg
Reinf. Nos. Spacing Remark
As3 mm mm mm m m m
As4 3695 REINFORCEMENT ACROSSAXIS OF BENDING:

S
T
As1 20 200 45 285 1245 2570 5 240.0

EM
T = 5250 As2 20 200 45 285 1245 -2570 5 240.0
L REINFORCEMENT ALONG AXIS OF BENDING:

ST
As3 20 200 75 55 3695 -665 19 202.222
0 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 NONE

SY
As4 20 200 45 55 3695 695 19 202.222
As2
As tension face (Length) = 5969.03 mm 2

G
1245 As Compression face (Length) = 5969.03 mm 2

IN
L= 1500 14000 As tension face (wiidth) = 1570.8 mm 2

R
INTERACTION DIAGRAM (Pu : MuTT) As Compression face (width) = 1570.8 mm 2
2
11938.1 mm

EE
NA xu 12000
Total As =
= 0.15 %
IN
Pu Mu 10000
xu/D
T Tm Balance Failure
G

1E-09 -655.96 -9.8395 8000 d1 1415 mm


Pu ( T )

EN

0.2 1877.52 1605.33 xu 873.46 mm


0.4 3937.64 2370.83 6000 xu/D 0.58
0.6 6014.96 2601.27 Pu 5813.92 T
L

0.8 8210.06 2238.29 Mu 2613.36 Tm


I

4000
IV

1 10342.5 1429.77
1.2 11461.2 825.11
C

1.4 11972.5 548.045 2000

1.6 12249.6 397.367


A

1.8 12417.2 305.854


D

0
2 12526.7 245.878 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
R

Mu (Tm)

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 104 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Formula Used In Construction of Intraction Diagram :


Pu = Cc+ Cs
Mu = Mc + Ms

.
D
LT
Cc = 0.361*fck*xu*b xu ≤ D
0.447*fck*(1 - 4*g/21)*b *D xu > D

T.
g = 16 / ( 7xu / D - 3 )2

PV
Cs =  ( fsi -fci) Asi

S
EM
fci = 0 si ≤ 0
0.447fck si ≥ 0.002
0.447fck [ 2 * (si / 0.002) -(si / 0.002)2 ] otherwise

ST
fsi = -0.87 fy si ≤ -0.00217

SY
esi* Es si > -0.00217 si ≤ 0.00217
0.87 fy si > 0.00217

G
IN
Mc = Cc * ( 0.5D - x )

R
Ms =  Csi * yi

x = 0.416 xu EE
xu ≤ D
IN
(0.5 - 8*g /49)*{D/ (1-4*g/21)} xu > D
G

x = Centroid of stress blok area from most compressed edge


EN

0.0035 * xu - D/ 2 + yi xu ≤ D
xu
I L

si =
IV

0.002* 1+ yi - D/14 xu > D


C

xu -3D/7
A
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 105 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Reinforcement in transverse direction :


Total vertical reinf. = 11938.1 mm2
Length of abutment = 5.25 m

.
D
Reinf. /m length = 2273.91 mm2/m

LT
Reinforcement in transvesre direction = 0.25 times vertical reinf
= 568.479 mm2/m ( total on both face)

T.
Cross -sectional area Ac per meter length/ heigth = 1500000 mm2 /m

PV
Minimum reinf. = 0.001 Ac
= 1500 mm2/m

S
Reinforcement required = 1500 mm2/m (total on both face)

EM
Provide 12  @ 100 c/c on each face

ST
= 1130.97 mm2/m on each face
@ 2261.95 mm2/m (total on both faces ) OK

SY
G
IN
R
EE
IN
G
EN
I L
IV
C
A
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 106 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

INTRACTION DIAGRAM : (P : MLL) SECTION AT SHAFT BOTTOM

.
Section Dimensions: Material Properties:

D
As1 D = 5250 mm fck = 35 N/mm22

LT
xu B = 1500 mm fyk = 500 N/mm
Es = 200000 N/mm2

T.
NA Reinforcement Details :

PV
As3 Dia Spacing Cover From To Y_Cg Remark
Reinf. Nos. Spacing
As4 3695 mm mm mm m m m

S
T REINFORCEMENT ACROSSAXIS OF BENDING:

EM
T = 5250 As3 20 200 75 55 3695 -665 19 202.222
L 0 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 NONE
As4 20 200 45 55 3695 695 19 202.222

ST
REINFORCEMENT ALONG AXIS OF BENDING:

SY
As1 20 200 45 285 1245 2570 5 240
As2 As2 20 200 45 285 1245 -2570 5 240

G
1245 Balance Failure

IN
L= 1500 14000 d1 5195

R
INTRACTION DIAGRAM (Pu : MuLL) xu 3206.79 mm
xu/D 0.610817

EE
12000

Pu Mu Pu 6026.004 T
xu/D
IN
T Tm 10000 Mu 8540.339 Tm
1E-09 -655.96 389.479
G

0.2 1474.43 5095.55 8000


Pu
EN

0.4 3653.76 7805.87


0.6 5903.81 8557.34 6000
0.8 8154.23 7343.08
I L

1 10319.7 4536.77
IV

4000
1.2 11440.7 2434.22
C

1.4 11953.1 1472.67 2000


1.6 12230.9 950.661
A

1.8 12398.9 634.278


D

0
2 12508.7 427.211
R

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000


100 12898.9 -340.54 Mu
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 107 of 139
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Confinment Reinforcement of PIER:

Width of abutment shaft b = 1500 mm


Length of abutment shaft L = 5250 mm

Clear cover to earth face = 75 mm


Clear cover to other face = 45 mm

2
Confined area of concrete = 7120800 mm

NED = 613.2 Tonne

.
D
Ac = 7875000 mm2

LT
fck = 35 Mpa
fcd = 15.63 Mpa

T.
fyd = 434.8 Mpa

PV
Normalized axial force
k = Max NED/Ac fck

S
k = 0.022 < 0.08

EM
< 0.3

Extent of confinment =
=
ST
Depth of section within the plane of bending
1.5 m
SY

Required volumentic ratio of transverse reinforcement


G

w,req = 0.37 Ac/ Acc k +0.13 fyd/fcd (L-0.01)


IN

Ac = Area of gross concrete section


2
= 7.88 m
R
EE

Acc = Confined core concrete area of the section within the


outside dia of loop.
2
= 7.12 m
IN
G

L = Reinforcement ratio of the longitudinal reinforcement


EN

= As/Acc

2
Area of steel provided As = 11938.1 mm
IL

2
L = 0.0016765 mm
IV

w,req = 0.0091034
C
A

Minimum Confining Reinforcement


w,d Max(1.4* w,req , 0.12)
D

=
= 0.12
R

Volumentic ratio of transverse reinforcement


w = wdfcd/fyd
= 0.0043148

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 108 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Volumentic ratio of transverse reinforcement


w = Asw / b SL
Area of the spiral or hoop bar
AsW = w *b * SL

b = Dimension of the core perpendicular to the direction of confinment.


= 1380 mm

SL = Spacing of hoops or ties in longitudinal direction (in vertical direction)


<= 1/5 * smalllest dimension of confined core

.
= 0.2 x 1380 = 276 mm

D
LT
= 270 mm

T.
Asw = 1607.69 mm2

PV
Provide 12 dia 19 Nos. @ 270 mm c/c

2
2148.8494 mm

S
Area of reinforcement provided at one section = OK

EM
Transverse distance b/w hoops legs or suplementry cross ties :

ST = Min
ST
1/3 * smalllest dimension of confined core
SY
200 mm

= Min 0.33 x 1380 = 460.00 mm


G

200 mm
IN

= 200.00 mm
R
EE
IN
G
EN
IL
IV
C
A
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 109 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

ULS SHEAR CHECK FOR PIER :


Design Shear Resitance ( IRC 112 / clause 10.3.2 (2) )
As1 k = Min 1 + √ 200/d d is depth in mm

.
D
2

LT
k = 1.365
T T=

T.
5250 1 = Min Asl /bw d
As4 0.02

PV
L 2
Asl = 5969.03 mm */ Reinforcement on tension face
As3 1 = 0.00076

S
EM
cp = Axial stress
As2

ST
min = 0.031 k3/2 fck1/2
= 0.293

SY
L= 1500
VRdc = Max ( 0.12 k (80 1 fck )0.33 + 0.15 cp ) bw d

G
fck = 35 Mpa (min +0.15cp ) bw d

IN
fcd = 15.63 Mpa

R
fyk = 500 Mpa

EE
Max Shear Capacity
2
Ac = 7875000 mm  = 0.6 * ( 1- fck /310) */ fck in Mpa
IN
2
As = 5969.03 mm = 0.532
G

VRDC, max = 0.5 bw d  fcd


EN

Reduction factor  0.5 for av < 0.5d = 3276.38 Tonne


LI
IV
C
A
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 110 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

ULS CHECK FOR PIER :


Forces at bottom ( SHEAR CAPACITY (LONGITUDINAL DIRn)
S.N. of abutment shaft Check

.
cp =
VRdc

D
Description
NED HL HL NED/AC

LT
HL < VRdc
Tonne Tonne Tonne N/mm2 Tonne
LC-1 NS LWL Span dislodge case 202.084 9.9204 4.9602 0.26 260.68 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS

T.
LC-2 NS LWL No Live load 313.688 19.8408 9.9204 0.40 277.42 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS

PV
LC-3 NS LWL With LL max reaction case 613.193 38.6131 19.3066 0.78 322.34 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS
LC-4 NS LWL With LL max moment case 597.809 38.4173 19.2086 0.76 320.04 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS

S
LC-5 LC-1 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 (5 191.054 69.4108 34.7054 0.24 259.02 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS

EM
LC-6 LC-1 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 (5 191.054 24.2954 12.1477 0.24 259.02 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS
LC-7 LC-1 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 (50 213.114 69.4108 34.7054 0.27 262.33 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS

ST
LC-8 LC-1 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 (50 213.114 24.2954 12.1477 0.27 262.33 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS

SY
LC-9 LC-2 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 287.908 146.758 73.3789 0.37 273.55 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS
LC-10 LC-2 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 287.908 56.5271 28.2635 0.37 273.55 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS

G
LC-11 LC-2 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 339.468 146.758 73.3789 0.43 281.29 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS
LC-12 LC-2 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 339.468 56.5271 28.2635 0.43 281.29 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS

IN
R
LC-13 LC-3 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 326.045 148.935 74.4675 0.41 279.27 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS

EE
LC-14 LC-3 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 326.045 58.7043 29.3521 0.41 279.27 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS
LC-15 LC-3 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 381.199 148.935 74.4675 0.48 287.54 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS
IN
LC-16 LC-3 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 381.199 58.7043 29.3521 0.48 287.54 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS
G

LC-17 LC-4 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 324.086 137.48 68.7399 0.41 278.98 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS
EN

LC-18 LC-4 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 324.086 47.249 23.6245 0.41 278.98 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS
LC-19 LC-4 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 379.056 137.48 68.7399 0.48 287.22 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS
L

LC-20 LC-4 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 379.056 47.249 23.6245 0.48 287.22 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS
I
IV

LC-21 NS HFL Span dislodge case 194.86 11.5597 5.77987 0.25 259.59 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS
C

LC-22 NS HFL No Live load 306.464 21.4801 10.7401 0.39 276.33 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS
LC-23 NS HFL With LL max reaction case 605.969 40.2525 20.1262 0.77 321.26 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS
A

LC-24 NS HFL With LL max moment case 590.585 40.0566 20.0283 0.75 318.95 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS
D
R

LC-25 LC-21 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 ( 183.83 79.0046 39.5023 0.23 257.94 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 111 of 139
RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

LC-26 LC-21 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 ( 183.83 31.7932 15.8966 0.23 257.94 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS
LC-27 LC-21 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 (5 205.89 79.0046 39.5023 0.26 261.25 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS
LC-28 LC-21 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 (5 205.89 31.7932 15.8966 0.26 261.25 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS

.
D
LT
LC-29 LC-22 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 280.684 156.37 78.1849 0.36 272.47 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS
LC-30 LC-22 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 280.684 61.9471 30.9735 0.36 272.47 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS

T.
LC-31 LC-22 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 332.244 156.37 78.1849 0.42 280.20 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS
LC-32 LC-22 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 332.244 61.9471 30.9735 0.42 280.20 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS

PV
LC-33 LC-23 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 318.821 156.563 78.2815 0.40 278.19 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS

S
LC-34 LC-23 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 318.821 62.1402 31.0701 0.40 278.19 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS

EM
LC-35 LC-23 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 373.975 156.563 78.2815 0.47 286.46 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS
LC-36 LC-23 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 373.975 62.1402 31.0701 0.47 286.46 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS

ST
LC-37 LC-24 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 316.862 145.108 72.5539 0.40 277.89 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS

SY
LC-38 LC-24 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 316.862 50.6849 25.3425 0.40 277.89 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS
LC-39 LC-24 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 371.832 145.108 72.5539 0.47 286.14 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS
LC-40 LC-24 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 371.832 50.6849 25.3425 0.47 286.14 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS

G
IN
LC-41 NS LWL Span dislodge case+wind load 212.709 17.1414 8.57068 0.27 262.27 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS

R
LC-42 NS LWL No Live load+wind load 310.824 16.9937 8.49683 0.39 276.99 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS
LC-43 NS LWL With LL max reaction case+w 515.645 32.7137 16.3569 0.65 307.71 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS
LC-44
LC-45
NS LWL With LL max reaction succedi
NS HFL Span dislodge case+wind load
594.945
206.93
57.3672
16.0545 EE
28.6836
8.02726
0.76
0.26
319.61
261.40
PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS
PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS
IN
LC-46 NS HFL No Live load+wind load 305.045 18.95 9.47498 0.39 276.12 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS
G

LC-47 NS HFL With LL max reaction case+w 509.866 32.7137 16.3569 0.65 306.84 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS
EN

LC-48 NS HFL With LL max reaction succedin 589.166 57.3672 28.6836 0.75 318.74 PROVIDE MINIMUM SHEAR LINKS
I L
IV
C
A
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 112 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Minimum shear reinforcement


Overall width of section = 5250 mm
Overall depth of section = 1500 mm

.
D
Effective Cover at section = 105 mm

LT
Effective depth of section = 1395 mm

T.
Minimum shear reinforcement ratio (min) 0.072√fck = 0.00085

PV
fyk
Shear reinforcement ratio (w) ASW

S
(Refer clause 16.5.2 (5) of IRC :112-2011) s. bw .sin

EM
Therefore,
2
4472.56 mm /m

ST
ASW (min) /s =

SY
Provide 10  links @ 200 c/c in trans dirn & 300 c/c vertically

2
Asw/s provided 6872.23 mm /m OK
I L
IV
C
A
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 113 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

CHECK FOR V SLENDERNESS RATIO: ( IRC 112 / clause 8.3.2 (3))

Ac = 7875000 mm2

.
D
2
As1 As = 5969.03 mm

LT
fcd = 15.6 Mpa
fyd = 434.8 Mpa

T.
T= Selenderness crateria
T
mm4

PV
As4 5250 Moment of Inertia about TT axis ITT = 1.47656E+12
Moment of Inertia about LL axis ILL = 1.80879E+13 mm4
As3 L

S
Radius of gyration along LL axis iL =  ITT /A

EM
= 433.013 mm

ST
Radius of gyration along TT axis iT =  ILL /A
As2 = 1515.54 mm

SY
L= 1500

G
IN
Clear Height of compression member lo = 6.65 m
Effective Length of column along LL -axis leL = 1.4 *lo

R
= 9.31 m

Selenderness ratio along L-L axis L = leL/ iL


EE
IN
= 21.50
G

Effective Length of column along TT -axis leT = 2.3 *lo


EN

= 15.30 m

Selenderness ratio along TT axis T = leT/ iT


L

= 10.09
I
IV

Check L / T = 2.13 > 2 Check for limiting slenderness ratio


C

And T / L = 0.47 < 2 Ignore second order effect


A
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 114 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

SUMMERY OF FORCES AT BOTTOM OF SHAFT: CHECK FOR SLENDERNESS RATIO


S.N. Description Forces at bottom of abutment shaft

.
eL = eT = (eL/L) / (eT/T) /

D
NED HL HT METT MELL eL /L eT /T CHECK
MTT/NED MLL/NED (eT/T) (eL/L)

LT
Tonne Tonne Tonne Tm Tm
LC-1 NS LWL Span dislodge case 202.1 9.9 0.0 76.4 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.3 0.0 7190.1 0.0 Check for limiting slenderness ratio
LC-2 NS LWL No Live load 313.7 19.8 0.0 147.4 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.3 0.0 13862.0 0.0 Check for limiting slenderness ratio

T.
LC-3 NS LWL With LL max reaction case 613.2 38.6 0.0 281.6 -365.4 0.5 -0.6 0.3 -0.1 -2.7 -0.4 Ignore second order effect

PV
LC-4 NS LWL With LL max moment case 597.8 38.4 0.0 280.2 -346.6 0.5 -0.6 0.3 -0.1 -2.8 -0.4 Ignore second order effect

LC-5 LC-1 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 (5 191.1 69.4 16.5 228.8 38.0 1.2 0.2 0.8 0.0 21.1 0.0 Check for limiting slenderness ratio

S
LC-6 LC-1 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 (5 191.1 24.3 55.2 97.3 126.6 0.5 0.7 0.3 0.1 2.7 0.4 Check for limiting slenderness ratio

EM
LC-7 LC-1 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 (50 213.1 69.4 16.5 229.0 38.0 1.1 0.2 0.7 0.0 21.1 0.0 Check for limiting slenderness ratio
LC-8 LC-1 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 (50 213.1 24.3 55.2 97.5 126.6 0.5 0.6 0.3 0.1 2.7 0.4 Check for limiting slenderness ratio

ST
LC-9 LC-2 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 287.9 146.8 38.7 508.7 118.9 1.8 0.4 1.2 0.1 15.0 0.1 Check for limiting slenderness ratio
LC-10 LC-2 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 287.9 56.5 128.9 245.6 396.4 0.9 1.4 0.6 0.3 2.2 0.5 Check for limiting slenderness ratio

SY
LC-11 LC-2 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 339.5 146.8 38.7 509.4 118.9 1.5 0.4 1.0 0.1 15.0 0.1 Check for limiting slenderness ratio
LC-12 LC-2 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 339.5 56.5 128.9 246.3 396.4 0.7 1.2 0.5 0.2 2.2 0.5 Check for limiting slenderness ratio

G
LC-13 LC-3 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 326.0 148.9 39.2 524.3 77.3 1.6 0.2 1.1 0.0 23.8 0.0 Check for limiting slenderness ratio

IN
LC-14 LC-3 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 326.0 58.7 130.7 261.2 366.0 0.8 1.1 0.5 0.2 2.5 0.4 Check for limiting slenderness ratio
LC-15 LC-3 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 381.2 148.9 39.2 525.0 72.9 1.4 0.2 0.9 0.0 25.2 0.0 Check for limiting slenderness ratio

R
LC-16 LC-3 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 381.2 58.7 130.7 261.9 361.6 0.7 0.9 0.5 0.2 2.5 0.4 Check for limiting slenderness ratio

LC-17
LC-18
LC-4 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3
LC-4 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3
324.1
324.1
137.5
47.2
39.2
130.6 EE
442.4
179.2
79.4
367.6
1.4
0.6
0.2
1.1
0.9
0.4
0.0
0.2
19.5
1.7
0.1
0.6
Check for limiting slenderness ratio
Check for limiting slenderness ratio
IN
LC-19 LC-4 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 379.1 137.5 39.2 443.1 75.2 1.2 0.2 0.8 0.0 20.6 0.0 Check for limiting slenderness ratio
G

LC-20 LC-4 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 379.1 47.2 130.6 180.0 363.4 0.5 1.0 0.3 0.2 1.7 0.6 Check for limiting slenderness ratio
EN

LC-21 NS HFL Span dislodge case 194.9 11.6 1.3 78.7 1.8 0.4 0.0 0.3 0.0 149.8 0.0 Check for limiting slenderness ratio
LC-22 NS HFL No Live load 306.5 21.5 1.3 149.7 1.8 0.5 0.0 0.3 0.0 284.8 0.0 Check for limiting slenderness ratio
L

LC-23 NS HFL With LL max reaction case 606.0 40.3 1.3 283.9 -363.6 0.5 -0.6 0.3 -0.1 -2.7 -0.4 Ignore second order effect
I

LC-24 NS HFL With LL max moment case 590.6 40.1 1.3 282.5 -344.8 0.5 -0.6 0.3 -0.1 -2.9 -0.3 Ignore second order effect
IV

LC-25 LC-21 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 ( 183.8 79.0 19.2 269.5 41.1 1.5 0.2 1.0 0.0 22.9 0.0 Check for limiting slenderness ratio
C

LC-26 LC-21 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 ( 183.8 31.8 60.9 135.9 132.8 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.1 3.6 0.3 Check for limiting slenderness ratio
A

LC-27 LC-21 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 (5 205.9 79.0 19.2 269.7 41.1 1.3 0.2 0.9 0.0 23.0 0.0 Check for limiting slenderness ratio
D

LC-28 LC-21 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 (5 205.9 31.8 60.9 136.1 132.8 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.1 3.6 0.3 Check for limiting slenderness ratio
R

LC-29 LC-22 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 280.7 156.4 41.8 531.1 122.5 1.9 0.4 1.3 0.1 15.2 0.1 Check for limiting slenderness ratio
LC-30 LC-22 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 280.7 61.9 136.2 263.8 404.0 0.9 1.4 0.6 0.3 2.3 0.4 Check forPage
limiting
115 slenderness
of 139 ratio
SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.
LC-31 RDA
LC-22 + Seismic
CIVIL Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3
ENGINEERING 332.2
SYSTEMS PVT. LTD. 156.4 41.8 531.8 122.5 1.6 0.4 1.1 0.1 15.2 0.1 Check for limiting slenderness ratio
LC-32 LC-22 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 332.2 61.9 136.2 264.6 404.0 0.8 1.2 0.5 0.2 2.3 0.4 Check for limiting slenderness ratio
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

LC-33 LC-23 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 318.8 156.6 42.3 532.4 80.8 1.7 0.3 1.1 0.0 23.1 0.0 Check for limiting slenderness ratio
LC-34 LC-23 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 318.8 62.1 138.0 265.2 373.7 0.8 1.2 0.6 0.2 2.5 0.4 Check for limiting slenderness ratio

.
D
LC-35 LC-23 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 374.0 156.6 42.3 533.2 76.4 1.4 0.2 1.0 0.0 24.4 0.0 Check for limiting slenderness ratio
LC-36 LC-23 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 374.0 62.1 138.0 265.9 369.3 0.7 1.0 0.5 0.2 2.5 0.4 Check for limiting slenderness ratio

LT
LC-37 LC-24 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=-0.3 316.9 145.1 42.3 450.5 83.0 1.4 0.3 0.9 0.0 19.0 0.1 Check for limiting slenderness ratio

T.
LC-38 LC-24 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=-0.3 316.9 50.7 137.9 183.3 375.2 0.6 1.2 0.4 0.2 1.7 0.6 Check for limiting slenderness ratio
LC-39 LC-24 + Seismic Sx=1,Sz=0.3,Sy=0.3 371.8 145.1 42.3 451.3 78.8 1.2 0.2 0.8 0.0 20.0 0.0 Check for limiting slenderness ratio

PV
LC-40 LC-24 + Seismic Sx=0.3,Sz=1,Sy=0.3 371.8 50.7 137.9 184.0 371.1 0.5 1.0 0.3 0.2 1.7 0.6 Check for limiting slenderness ratio

S
LC-41 NS LWL Span dislodge case+wind load 212.7 17.1 44.2 119.3 286.8 0.6 1.3 0.4 0.3 1.5 0.7 Check for limiting slenderness ratio
LC-42 NS LWL No Live load+wind load 310.8 17.0 70.7 117.1 462.7 0.4 1.5 0.3 0.3 0.9 1.1 Check for limiting slenderness ratio

EM
LC-43 NS LWL With LL max reaction case+w 515.6 32.7 16.6 236.4 -162.6 0.5 -0.3 0.3 -0.1 -5.1 -0.2 Ignore second order effect
LC-44 NS LWL With LL max reaction succedi 594.9 57.4 78.5 404.8 168.1 0.7 0.3 0.5 0.1 8.4 0.1 Check for limiting slenderness ratio

ST
LC-45 NS HFL Span dislodge case+wind load 206.9 16.1 39.9 112.1 257.9 0.5 1.2 0.4 0.2 1.5 0.7 Check for limiting slenderness ratio
LC-46 NS HFL No Live load+wind load 305.0 18.9 78.5 130.1 514.7 0.4 1.7 0.3 0.3 0.9 1.1 Check for limiting slenderness ratio

SY
LC-47 NS HFL With LL max reaction case+wi 509.9 32.7 16.6 236.4 -162.6 0.5 -0.3 0.3 -0.1 -5.1 -0.2 Ignore second order effect
LC-48 NS HFL With LL max reaction succedin 589.2 57.4 78.5 404.8 168.1 0.7 0.3 0.5 0.1 8.4 0.1 Check for limiting slenderness ratio

G
IN
R
EE
IN
G
EN
L
I
IV
C
A
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 116 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

CHECK FOR PIER SECOND ORDER FORCES: ( IRC 112 / clause 11.2.1)

Ac = 7875000 mm2
2
As1 As = 5969.03 mm
fcd = 15.6 Mpa
fyd = 434.8 Mpa

Selenderness crateria
T
As4 Moment of Inertia about TT axis ITT = 1.47656E+12 mm4
T= Moment of Inertia about LL axis ILL = 1.80879E+13 mm4
As3 L 5250
Radius of gyration along LL axis iL =  ITT /A
= 433.013 mm

.
D
Radius of gyration along TT axis iT =  ILL /A

LT
As2 = 1515.54 mm

T.
L= 1500

PV
Clear Height of compression member lo = 6.65 m
Effective length of column along L-L leL = 1.4 *lo

S
= 9.31 m

EM
Selenderness ratio along L-L axis L = leL/ iL
=
ST
21.50

Effective Length of column along TT -axis leT = 2.3 *lo


SY
= 15.30 m
G

Selenderness ratio along TT axis T = leT/ iT


= 10.09
IN
R

Finding Limiting Value of Slenderness Ratio.


lim = 20 A B C/ n
EE

(,to) = 1.79 Creep for abutment shaft


IN

MoEqp/MoEd = Ratio of BM in Quasi Permanent LC of SLS to BM in Design LC of ULS


G

ef = (,to) * MoEqp/MoEd


A = 1/ (1+0.2 ef)
EN

 = As fyd / (Ac fcd)


= 0.021
IL
IV

B =  ( 1 + 2 )
= 1.021
C

rm = Mo1 /Mo2 (Ratio of First order moments at two ends of members


A

= 0
D

C = 1.7 - rm
R

= 1.7

n = NED / (Ac fcd)


= NED / 12311.25 */ (NED in Tonne)

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 117 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

SUMMERY OF FORCES AT BOTTOM OF SHAFT: CHECK FOR SECOND ORDER EFFECT ( along LL Axis)
S.N. ULS FORCES SLS (QP LC) Second Order Effect
MoEqp
NED METT MELL METT MELL ef A n lim ( <lim) : Ignore
/MoEd
Tonne Tm Tm Tm Tm ( >lim) : Consider
LC-1 202.1 76.4 0.0 98.7 0.0 1.29 2.31 0.68 0.02 185.30 Ignore second order effect
LC-2 313.7 147.4 0.0 98.7 0.0 0.67 1.20 0.81 0.03 175.41 Ignore second order effect
LC-3 613.2 281.6 -365.4 98.7 0.0 0.35 0.63 0.89 0.05 138.19 Ignore second order effect
LC-4 597.8 280.2 -346.6 98.7 0.0 0.35 0.63 0.89 0.05 139.88 Ignore second order effect

LC-5 191.1 228.8 38.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 278.62 Ignore second order effect
LC-6 191.1 97.3 126.6 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 278.62 Ignore second order effect
LC-7 213.1 229.0 38.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 263.81 Ignore second order effect
LC-8 213.1 97.5 126.6 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 263.81 Ignore second order effect

.
D
LC-9 287.9 508.7 118.9 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 226.97 Ignore second order effect

LT
LC-10 287.9 245.6 396.4 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 226.97 Ignore second order effect
LC-11 339.5 509.4 118.9 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 209.02 Ignore second order effect
LC-12 339.5 246.3 396.4 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 209.02 Ignore second order effect

T.
LC-13 326.0 524.3 77.3 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 213.28 Ignore second order effect

PV
LC-14 326.0 261.2 366.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 213.28 Ignore second order effect
LC-15 381.2 525.0 72.9 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 197.25 Ignore second order effect
LC-16 381.2 261.9 361.6 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00

S
0.03 197.25 Ignore second order effect

EM
LC-17 324.1 442.4 79.4 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 213.93 Ignore second order effect
LC-18 324.1 179.2 367.6 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 213.93 Ignore second order effect
LC-19
LC-20
379.1
379.1
443.1
180.0
75.2
363.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0 ST
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
0.03
0.03
197.81
197.81
Ignore second order effect
Ignore second order effect
SY
LC-21 194.9 78.7 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 275.89 Ignore second order effect
LC-22 306.5 149.7 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 219.99 Ignore second order effect
LC-23 606.0 283.9 -363.6 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.05 156.45 Ignore second order effect
G

LC-24 590.6 282.5 -344.8 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.05 158.47 Ignore second order effect
IN

LC-25 183.8 269.5 41.1 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.01 284.05 Ignore second order effect
R

LC-26 183.8 135.9 132.8 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.01 284.05 Ignore second order effect
EE

LC-27 205.9 269.7 41.1 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 268.40 Ignore second order effect
LC-28 205.9 136.1 132.8 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 268.40 Ignore second order effect
IN

LC-29 280.7 482.8 122.5 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 229.87 Ignore second order effect
LC-30 280.7 263.8 404.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 229.87 Ignore second order effect
G

LC-31 332.2 531.8 122.5 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 211.28 Ignore second order effect
EN

LC-32 332.2 264.6 404.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 211.28 Ignore second order effect

LC-33 318.8 532.4 80.8 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 215.69 Ignore second order effect
IL

LC-34 318.8 265.2 373.7 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 215.69 Ignore second order effect
LC-35 374.0 533.2 76.4 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 199.15 Ignore second order effect
IV

LC-36 374.0 265.9 369.3 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 199.15 Ignore second order effect
C

LC-37 316.9 450.5 83.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 216.35 Ignore second order effect
A

LC-38 316.9 183.3 375.2 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 216.35 Ignore second order effect
LC-39 371.8 451.3 78.8 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 199.72 Ignore second order effect
D

LC-40 371.8 184.0 371.1 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 199.72 Ignore second order effect
R

LC-41 212.7 119.3 286.8 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 264.06 Ignore second order effect
LC-42 310.8 117.1 462.7 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 218.44 Ignore second order effect
LC-43 515.6 236.4 -162.6 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.04 169.60 Ignore second order effect
LC-44 594.9 404.8 168.1 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.05 157.89 Ignore second order effect
LC-45 206.9 112.1 257.9 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 267.72 Ignore second order effect
LC-46 305.0 130.1 514.7 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 220.50 Ignore second order effect
LC-47 509.9 236.4 -162.6 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.04 170.56 Ignore second order effect
LC-48 589.2 404.8 168.1 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.05 158.66 Ignore second order effect

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 118 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

CHECK FOR SECOND ORDER EFFECT ( along TT Axis)


Load Second Order Effect
MoEqp
Case ef A n lim ( <lim) : Ignore
/MoEd
( >lim) : Consider
LC-1 0.74 1.33 0.79 0.02 214.14 Ignore second order effect
LC-2 0.74 1.33 0.79 0.03 171.87 Ignore second order effect
LC-3 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.05 155.53 Ignore second order effect
LC-4 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.05 157.52 Ignore second order effect

LC-5 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 278.62 Ignore second order effect
LC-6 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 278.62 Ignore second order effect
LC-7 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 263.81 Ignore second order effect
LC-8 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 263.81 Ignore second order effect

.
D
LC-9 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 226.97 Ignore second order effect
LC-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 226.97 Ignore second order effect

LT
LC-11 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 209.02 Ignore second order effect
LC-12 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 209.02 Ignore second order effect

T.
LC-13 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 213.28 Ignore second order effect

PV
LC-14 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 213.28 Ignore second order effect
LC-15 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 197.25 Ignore second order effect
LC-16 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 197.25 Ignore second order effect

S
EM
LC-17 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 213.93 Ignore second order effect
LC-18 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 213.93 Ignore second order effect
LC-19 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 197.81 Ignore second order effect
LC-20 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 197.81 ST
Ignore second order effect
SY
LC-21 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 275.89 Ignore second order effect
LC-22 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 219.99 Ignore second order effect
LC-23 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.05 156.45 Ignore second order effect
G

LC-24 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.05 158.47 Ignore second order effect
IN

LC-25 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.01 284.05 Ignore second order effect
R

LC-26 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.01 284.05 Ignore second order effect
LC-27 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 268.40 Ignore second order effect
EE

LC-28 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 268.40 Ignore second order effect
IN

LC-29 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 229.87 Ignore second order effect
LC-30 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 229.87 Ignore second order effect
G

LC-31 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 211.28 Ignore second order effect
LC-32 0.00 0.00
EN

1.00 0.03 211.28 Ignore second order effect

LC-33 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 215.69 Ignore second order effect
LC-34 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 215.69 Ignore second order effect
IL

LC-35 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 199.15 Ignore second order effect
IV

LC-36 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 199.15 Ignore second order effect
C

LC-37 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 216.35 Ignore second order effect
LC-38 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 216.35 Ignore second order effect
A

LC-39 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 199.72 Ignore second order effect
D

LC-40 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 199.72 Ignore second order effect
R

LC-41 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 264.06 Ignore second order effect
LC-42 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 218.44 Ignore second order effect
LC-43 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.04 169.60 Ignore second order effect
LC-44 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.05 157.89 Ignore second order effect
LC-45 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 267.72 Ignore second order effect
LC-46 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 220.50 Ignore second order effect
LC-47 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.04 170.56 Ignore second order effect
LC-48 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.05 158.66 Ignore second order effect

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 119 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

SLS, STRESS CHECK FOR PIER :

.
Modulus of Elasticity for Concrete

D
Design Bending Moment MRARE = 307.77 Tm

LT
MQP = 98.66 Tm
MST = MRARE - MQP (Bending Moment due to short term loading)

T.
= 209.11 Tm

PV
Modulus of Elasticity for Concrete
For short term loading Ecm = 32308.2 Mpa

S
Creep coefficent  = 1.73

EM
For long term loading Ecm' = 11848.3 Mpa

2
Es 200000 N/mm

ST
Reinf. modulus of elasticity =

SY
Modular ratio for QP Combination = Es / Ecm = 16.880
Equivalent Modulus of Elasticity for Rare Combination :
Ec,eq = Ecm*(MQP+MST) = 20796.6 MPa

G
MST +(1+)* MQP

IN
Modular ratio for Rare Combination = Es/ Ec,eq = 9.62

R
Permissible Stresses
Permissible conc. Stresses
Rare Combination
16.8 EE
Quasi Permanent
12.6
IN
Permissible steel stresses -300 -300
G
EN
I L
IV
C
A
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 120 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

SLS, FORCES AT PIER SHAFT BOTTOM


SUMMERY OF FORCES :

.
D
S.N. Description FORCES @ SHAFT BOTTOM Modular

LT
N HL HT MTT MLL NED MED VED ratio
Tonne Tonne Tonne Tm Tm Tonne Tm Tonne

T.
LC-1 LWL QP, NS LWL DL, Snow load 232.362 13.2272 0 98.6551 0.02756 232.4 98.7 13.2 16.88
LC-2 HFL QP, NS LWL DL, Snow load 225.138 13.2272 0 98.6551 0.02756 225.1 98.7 13.2 16.88

PV
LC-3 LWL RARE, NS LWL DL, Snow load, 432.032 25.7421 0 188.137 -243.57 432.0 307.8 25.7 9.62

S
LC-4 LWL RARE, NS LWL DL, Snow load, 421.775 25.6115 0 187.203 -231.06 421.8 297.4 25.6 9.62
LC-5 HFL RARE, NS LWL DL, Snow load, L 424.808 27.3814 1.28687 190.433 -241.77 424.8 307.8 27.4 9.62

EM
LC-6 HFL RARE, NS LWL DL, Snow load, L 414.551 27.2509 1.28687 189.499 -229.25 414.6 297.4 27.3 9.62

ST
SY
G
IN
R
EE
IN
G
EN
I L
IV
C
A
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 121 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

SLS CHECK FOR PIER :

.
D
LT
As1

T.
PV
T T=
5250

S
As4
L

EM
As3

ST
SY
As2

G
L= 1500

IN
R
SLS CHECK FOR ABUTMENT PIER :
EE
IN
Forces at bottom of abutment shaft
S.N. Forces @ axis
G

Description
NED HL HT METT MELL V HL HT METT MELL
EN

Tonne Tonne Tonne Tm Tm Tonne Tonne Tonne Tm Tm


LC-1 LWL QP, NS LWL DL, Snow load 232.4 13.2 0.0 98.7 0.0 232.4 13.2 0.0 98.7 0.0
L

LC-2 HFL QP, NS LWL DL, Snow load 225.1 13.2 0.0 98.7 0.0 225.1 13.2 0.0 98.7 0.0
I
IV

LC-3 LWL RARE, NS LWL DL, Snow load, L 432.0 25.7 0.0 188.1 -243.6 432.0 25.7 0.0 188.1 -243.6
C

LC-4 LWL RARE, NS LWL DL, Snow load, L 421.8 25.6 0.0 187.2 -231.1 421.8 25.6 0.0 187.2 -231.1
LC-5 HFL RARE, NS LWL DL, Snow load, L 424.8 27.4 1.3 190.4 -241.8 424.8 27.4 1.3 190.4 -241.8
A

LC-6 HFL RARE, NS LWL DL, Snow load, L 414.6 27.3 1.3 189.5 -229.3 414.6 27.3 1.3 189.5 -229.3
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 122 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

INTERACTION DIAGRAM : (P : MTT) SECTION AT SHAFT BOTTOM

Section Dimensions:
2 3 D = 1500 mm
As1 B = 5250 mm

Material Properties:
2
fck = 15.6333333 N/mm
2
As3 fyk = 434.782609 N/mm
2
As4 5195 Es = 200000 N/mm

T = 5250

.
D
LT
T.
T
As2

PV
1 4
1322 L
dy L= 1500

S
EM
 NA xu

ST
SY

NA
G

Reinforcement Details :
IN

Eff. From To As per


Dia Spacing Cover Nos. Spacing
Reinf. cover Total As unit
R

L T L T

mm mm mm mm Nos. mm mm2 mm mm mm mm mm2/mm


EE

As1 20 125 45 55 10 133.0 3141.6 125 5195 1322 5195 2.6


As2 20 125 45 55 10 133.0 3141.6 125 55 1322 55 2.6
IN

As3 25 100 75 87.5 52 100.8 25525 87.5 55 87.5 5195 5.0


G

0 100 0 0 52 100.8 0.0 0 55 0 5195 0.0


As4 16 100 45 53 52 100.8 25525.4 1447 55 1447 5195 5.0
EN

Closed
IL

SECTION COORDINATE
IV

S.N x y Properties of Gross Cross-section


C

1 0 0 Properties @ XY axis @ centrodial axis


2 2
2 0 5250 A = 8E+06 mm 8E+06 mm
A

3 1500 5250 cgL = 750 mm 750 mm


D

4 1500 0 cgT = 2625 mm 2625 mm


R

4 4
5 0 0 ILL = 7E+13 mm 2E+13 mm
4 4
Closed ITT = 6.E+12 mm 1.E+12 mm
4 4
ILT = 2.E+13 mm 0.E+00 mm

Modulus of Elasticity for Concrete


Design Bending Moment MRARE = 187.20 Tm
MQP = 98.66 Tm
MST = MRARE - MQP (Bending Moment due to short term loading)
= 88.55 Tm

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 123 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Modulus of Elasticity for Concrete


For short term loading Ecm = 32308.2 Mpa
Creep coefficent  = 1.00
For long term loading Ecm' = 16154.1 Mpa

2
Reinf. modulus of elasticity Es = 200000 N/mm

Modular ratio for QP Combination = Es / Ecm' = 12.38074

Equivalent Modulus of Elasticity for Rare Combination :


Ec,eq = Ecm*(MQP+MST) = 21158.05 MPa
MST +(1+)* MQP

.
D
LT
Modular ratio for Rare Combination = Es/ Ec,eq = 9.45

T.
Forces Finding Position of Neutral Axs

PV
P MTT MLL Modular First Trail Valuse Adopted Value suggested by program
LC T Tm Tm ratio  dy  dy  dy NA_stress

S
radian mm radian mm radian mm Mpa

EM
LC-1 232.4 98.7 0.1 12.38 4.7 -7E+06 4.7 -4E+07 4.7 -2E+06 2.74
LC-2 225.1 98.7 0.1 12.38 4.7 -7E+06 4.7 -4E+07 4.7 -3E+06 2.63

LC-3
LC-4
432.0
421.8
188.1
187.2
243.6
231.1
9.45
9.45
4.60709
4.61197
-4E+03
-5E+03
ST 4.7
4.7
-8E+04
-8E+04
4.58308
4.59067
-5E+02
-8E+02
12.01
11.35
SY
LC-5 424.8 190.4 241.8 9.45 4.60912 -5E+03 4.7 -8E+04 4.5881 -8E+02 11.88
LC-6 414.6 189.5 229.3 9.45 4.61395 -5E+03 4.7 -8E+04 4.59541 -1E+03 11.22
G
IN

x y x y Dist.
1500 0 0 5250
R

from
Max. Concrete Permissible conc. Max. Tensile Stress Permissible steel N.A
EE

LOAD COMBIANTIONS Stress (Mpa) stresses(Mpa) (Mpa) stresses (Mpa) (mm) (4)
LC-1 QUASI PERMANENT 0.666 16.8 OK -2.1 -400 OK -1195.55
IN

LC-2 COMBIANTION 0.659 16.8 OK -2.2 -400 OK -1177.09


LC-3 1.785 12.6 OK -8.7 -300 OK -1429.29
G

LC-4 1.754 12.6 OK -8.7 -300 OK -1393.22


EN

RARE COMBINATION
LC-5 1.795 12.6 OK -9.1 -300 OK -1390.66
LC-6 1.764 12.6 OK -9.2 -300 OK -1356
IL
IV

First Trail NA
tan ()=
C

MLL * ITT/ MTT / ILL


A

tan ()= (eL-eL') * ILL - (eT-eT')*ILT


D

(eT-eT') * ITT - (eL-eL')*ILT


R

 (L1 , T1) = P/Aeff + P*(eL-eL') - P*(eT-eT')*(ILTeff / ILeff)


( L1 - CgLeff )
ITeff - (ILTeff2 / ILeff)

+ P*(eT-eT') - P*(eL-eL')*(ILTeff / ITeff)


( T1 - CgTeff )
ILeff - (ILTeff2 / ITeff)

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 124 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

(SLS) CHECK FOR CRACK WIDTH (QUASI PERMANENT LOAD COMBINATIONS)

Minimum Reinforcement for crack control :


As,min = kc k fct,eff Act / s ( IRC 112 / clause 12.3.3 (2) )
For Web
kc = 0.4 For Bending member

h = 1.5 m , b = 1m
k = 0.65

fcteff = fctm
= 2.77 Mpa

.
D
Act =

LT
Area of concrete within tensile zone just before the first crack form, section behaves
elastically until the tensile fiber stress reaches fctm. hence Neutral axis depth will be
considered for gross section

T.
Act = b * h/2

PV
2
= 0.75 m

s = Maximum stress permitted in reinf. Immediately after formation of crack

S
= fyk

EM
= 434.783 Mpa

Asmin =
2
1242.91 mm /m <
<
ST 2
4861.99 mm /m on tension face
2
4862.0 mm /m on compression face
OK
OK
SY

Calculation of crack width : ( IRC 112 / clause 12.3.4)


wk,max
G

= 0.2 mm
IN

Clear cover c = 75 mm
R

Bar dia eq = 25.00 mm


EE

5 (c +eq/2) = 437.5 mm
IN

Spacing b/w bars = 100 mm < 437.5 mm


The Following formula can be used for
G

srmax = Maximum crack spacing calculation of maximum crack spacing.


EN

= 3.4c + 0.17Peff
= 704.083 mm
IL

hc,eff = Min 2.5 ( h - d ) h = 1.5 m


IV

( h - x/3 ) d = 1.2945 m
C

h/2 x = 1.393 m */ (for Quasi Permanent Load


= 0.51375 m combination)
A
D

width b = 1m
R

2
Ac,eff = hc,eff *b = 0.51375 m

P,eff = As/ Ac,eff


= 4862.0 / 513750
= 0.00946

sc = Stress in tension Reinforcement assuming cracked section


= 2.24 Mpa */ (for Quasi Permanent Load combination)

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 125 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Es = 200000 Mpa
Ecm' = 16154.1 Mpa */ (for Long term loading)
e = Es/Ecm
e = 12.3807

kt = 0.5 (factor dependent on duration of load)

sm - cm = Max sc - kt fct,eff ( 1+ e P,eff ) / P,eff


Es
0.6 sc / Es

.
D
= 6.7E-06

LT
wk = srmax ( sm - cm )

T.
= 0.005 mm < 0.2 mm OK

PV
S
EM
ST
SY
G
IN
R
EE
IN
G
EN
IL
IV
C
A
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 126 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

DESIGN OF PIER CAP TRANSVERSE DIRECTION :

.
D
1.06

LT
1.294

T.
PV
2.706

S
3.71

EM
2.706

ST
SY
1.294

G
0.00 0.00

IN
2.00

R
EE
Section at deff
1.575
1.294 0.85 0.00 0.00
IN
G

0.875 0.875
EN

1.750 1.750 1.75


0.875 0.875
0.47 1.06 0.47
L
I
IV

1.38 0 2.00
C
A
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 127 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Lever arm in transverse direction a = 849.8 mm


Overall depth h = 1750 mm

.
D
Clear cover to main bar = 50 mm
Effective depth d = 1575 mm

LT
width b = 2000 mm
a/d = 0.5 < 1

T.
PV
Cross-setion properties At face of column At deff Location At Bearing Location
Width b = 2.00 m 2.00 m 2.00 m
Overall depth d = 1.75 m 1.75 m 1.75 m

S
2 2 2
Cross-section Area at bearing location A = 3.50 m 3.50 m 3.50 m

EM
Outer perimeter u = 7.5 m 7.5 m 7.5 m
Effective wall thickness teff,i = 0.47 m 0.47 m 0.47 m
2 2 2

ST
Area enclosed by c/L of wall, Ak = 1.97 m 1.97 m 1.97 m
Perimeter of the area Ak = 7.50 m 7.50 m 7.50 m

SY
Forces Due to Selfweight of pier Cap :
3
Density of concrete = 2.5 t/m

G
Description At Facs of shaft At deff Below bearing

IN
Weight of Straight Portion T = 9.38 2.49 5.66
Lever arm from section m = 1.07 0.28 0.65

R
Torsional Eccentricity m = 0.00 0.00 0.00

Weight of Straight Portion T = 9.38


EE 2.49 5.66
IN
Lever arm from Section m = 1.07 0.28 0.65
Torsional Eccentricity m = 0.00 0.00 0.00
G

Shear Force at section Tonne = 18.76 4.98 11.32


EN

Moment at section Tm = 20.11 1.42 7.33


Torsional Moment Tm = 0.00 0.00 0.00
L

*/ Forces due to selfweight are increased by 20% on account of stopper etc.


I
IV

Shear Force at section Tonne = 22.51 5.97 13.59


C

Moment at section Tm = 24.13 1.70 8.79


Torsional Moment Tm = 0.00 0.00 0.00
A
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 128 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

.
D
Forces due to Super-structure DL, SIDL & Live Load :
Component

LT
B1 B2
Reaction Reaction

T.
Tonne Tonne

PV
SUP DL = 60.0 0.0 60.0 0.0
Snow load = 22.68 0 22.68 0
Surfacing = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

S
EM
LL Maximum Reaction case
LL (without impact) = 96 0 103 0
LL (with impact) = 110.78 0.00 118.84 0.00

ST
Impact factor 0.15

SY
LL Maximum Moment case
LL (without impact) = 44 0 48 0
LL (with impact) = 50.60 0.00 55.20 0.00

G
Impact factor 0.15

IN
Total Load (Tonne)

R
EE
IN
G
EN
I L
IV
C
A
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 129 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Forces at face of column (L1+ R1)


B1 B2

.
D
Component Shear Lever Lever Shear Lever Lever Bending Torsional Load Factor
Force arm eT arm eL Force arm eT arm eL Moment Moment ULS Factor

LT
Tonne m m Tonne m m Tm Tm Rare QP
Selfweight of pier cap = 22.51 1.07 0.00 24.13 0.00 1.35 1 1

T.
SUP DL = 60.00 0.85 0.00 60.0 0.85 0.00 101.98 0.00 1.35 1 1

PV
snow load = 22.68 0.85 0.00 22.7 0.85 0.00 38.55 0.00 1.35 1 1
Surfacing = 0.00 0.85 0.00 0.0 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.75 1 1

S
*/ LL Max reaction case

EM
LL (with impact) = 110.78 0.85 0.00 119 0.85 0.00 195.14 0.00 1.5 1 0

*/ LL Longitudinal moment case

ST
LL (with impact) = 50.60 0.85 0.00 55 0.85 0.00 89.91 0.00 1.5 1 0

SY
*/LL Max reaction case
Design Forces

G
ULS 598.1 515.0 0.0

IN
SLS Rare 417.5 359.8 0.0
SLS Quasi permanent 187.9 164.7 0.0

R
EE
*/LL Longitudinal moment case
Design Forces
ULS 412.3 357.2 0.0
IN
SLS Rare 293.7 254.6 0.0
SLS Quasi permanent 187.9 164.7 0.0
G
EN

*/Governing case
Design Forces
L

ULS 598.1 515.0 0.0


I

SLS Rare 417.5


IV

359.8 0.0
SLS Quasi permanent 187.9 164.7 0.0
C
A
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 130 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Forces at section deff (L1+ R1)

.
D
B1 B2
Component Shear Lever Lever Shear Lever Lever Bending Torsional Load Factor

LT
Force arm eT arm eL Force arm eT arm eL Moment Moment Factor
Tonne m m Tonne m m Tm Tm ULS Rare QP

T.
Selfweight of pier cap = 5.97 0.28 0.00 1.70 0.00 1.35 1 1

PV
SUP DL = 60.00 0.73 0.00 60.00 0.73 0.00 87.02 0.00 1.35 1 1
snow load = 22.68 0.73 0 22.68 0.73 0 32.89 0.00 1.35 1 1
Surfacing = 0.00 0.73 0 0.00 0.73 0 0.00 0.00 1.75 1 1

S
EM
*/ LL Max reaction case
LL (with impact) = 110.78 0.73 0 118.84 0.73 0 166.511 0.00 1.5 1 0

ST
*/ LL Longitudinal moment case
LL (with impact) = 50.60 0.73 0 55.20 0.73 0 76.72 0.00 1.5 1 0

SY
*/LL Max reaction case

G
Design Forces

IN
ULS 575.7 413.9 0.0
SLS Rare 401.0 288.1 0.0

R
SLS Quasi permanent 171.3 121.6 0.0

*/LL Longitudinal moment case


Design Forces EE
IN
ULS 390.0 279.3 0.0
SLS Rare 277.1 198.3 0.0
G

SLS Quasi permanent 171.3 121.6 0.0


EN

*/Governing case
L

Design Forces
I

ULS 575.7 413.9 0.0


IV

SLS Rare 401.0 288.1 0.0


C

SLS Quasi permanent 171.3 121.6 0.0


A
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 131 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

.
D
Forces below bearing (L1+ R1)
B1 B2

LT
Component Shear Lever Lever Shear Lever Lever Bending Torsional Load Factor
Force arm eT arm eL Force arm eT arm eL Moment Moment Factor

T.
Tonne m m Tonne m m Tm Tm ULS Rare QP
Selfweight of pier cap = 13.59 0.65 0.00 8.79 0.00 1.35 1 1

PV
SUP DL = 60.00 0 0.00 60.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.35 1 1
snow load = 22.68 0 0 22.68 0 0 0.00 0.00 1.35 1 1

S
Surfacing = 0.00 0 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 1.75 1 1

EM
*/ LL Max reaction case
LL (with impact) = 110.78 0 0 118.84 0 0 0.00 0.00 1.5 1 0

ST
*/ LL Longitudinal moment case

SY
LL (with impact) = 50.60 0 0 55.20 0 0 0.00 0.00 1.5 1 0

G
*/LL Max reaction case

IN
Design Forces
ULS 586.0 11.9 0.0

R
SLS Rare 408.6 8.8 0.0

EE
SLS Quasi permanent 178.9 8.8 0.0

*/LL Longitudinal moment case


IN
Design Forces
ULS 400.3 11.9 0.0
G

SLS Rare 284.7 8.8 0.0


EN

SLS Quasi permanent 178.9 8.8 0.0


L

*/Governing case
I

Design Forces
IV

ULS 586.0 11.9 0.0


C

SLS Rare 408.6 8.8 0.0


SLS Quasi permanent 178.9 8.8 0.0
A
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 132 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION
DESIGN OF PIER CAP :
MATERIAL PROPERTIES :
Grade of concrete = M 35 MPa PERMISSIBLE STRESSES
Grade of Reinforcement = Fe 500 MPa 1) Premissble concrete compressive stresses

.
fywd = 0.8 fyk = 400 MPa Load Combi Permissble Stress

TD
Clear cover = 45 mm SLS Rare 0.48 fck = 16.8 Mpa
Modulus of Elasticity steel Es = 200000 Mpa SLS QP 0.36 fck = 12.6 Mpa

.L
For short Term loading Ecm = 32308.2 Mpa
For long Term loading Ecm' = 11638 Mpa

T
Mean tensile strength = fctm = 2.77 Mpa 2) Permissble Tensile stress in steel= 0.8 fy fctm
0.26 bt d

PV
fcd = 15.63 Mpa = 400 Mpa fyk
Creep factor  = 1.78 Rare combination = 300 Mpa As.min = Max of
uk = 0.0045 3) Permissible crack width w k 0.0013 bt d
ud = 0.0041 SLS QP Load combination = 0.3 mm
cu2 = 0.0035
xumax/d = 0.4636

A) ULS CAPACITY CHECK


Check Check Check

Ast,cal =M/ 0.87

MRd =0.87 fyk


xu = 0.87 fyk

fyk (d'-0.416

Ast (d-0.416
Ast / 0.362

Ast,provided > Ast

MED/z +FD
Ast,additional
Area of steel provided

Required
Toatl Ast

Ast Calc.<Ast
Ast, z = d- MED/z

(Torsion)
Overall

MRD/z >
fck b

G xu)

xu)
MED b depth D d Dia Nos Spacing Provided xmax Check Ast min Fd 0.416 xu +FD MRD/z

Provided

min
2
Load comb. Tm mm mm mm mm nos mm mm mm mm mm2 mm2 mm2 mm2 T m T Tm Tm/m

IN
Section at face of columne

ER
ULS BM 515.00 2000 1750 1632.0 25 18 109.0 17671.5 756.56 303.358 UR, OK 7862.35 0.0 7862.4 OK 4703.62 OK 299.03 1505.8 641.04 1157.5 768.708 OK
25 18
0 18
Section at deff from face of columne
ULS BM 413.94 2000 1750.0 1632.0 25 18 109.0 17671.5 756.56 303.358 UR, OK 6319.46 0.0 6319.5 OK 4703.62 OK 287.87 1505.8 562.762 1157.5 768.708 OK
IN
25 18
0 18
Section just below bearing
G

ULS BM 11.87 2000 1750.0 1632.0 25 18 109.0 17671.5 756.56 303.358 UR, OK 181.18 0.0 181.2 OK 4703.62 OK 293.00 1505.8 300.886 1157.5 768.708 OK
EN

25 18
0 18
I L
IV
C
A
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 133 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION
B) SLS STRESS CHECK
Rare Load combination. Formula used for calculation of stress
Ec,eq = Ecm*(MQP+MST) = 17822.2 MPa dc (depth of neutral axis) = -m*As +  ( m2 * As2 + 2* m*As*b* d )
MST +(1+)* MQP b

.
TD
3 2
MST = MRARE -MQP = 195.14 Tm INA (Transformed) = b *dc /3 + m* As *(d-dc)
m = Es/ Ec,eq = 11.22 MPa
Compressive stress in concrete c = MRARE* dc / INA

.L
Quasi Permanent Load Combination Tensile stress in steel s = m* MRARE* (d - dc ) / I NA
m = Es / Ecm' = 17.19 MPa

VT
Stress Check for SLS Load Combinations
M N.A.
Ast, modular depth Comp Tensile Max T Stress
Max C. Check Check
Load comb. b d Provided
ratio (dc) INA stress Stress stress
2
(tm/m) mm mm mm mm mm4 Mpa Mpa Mpa Mpa

Section at face of columne


SLS (R Comb.) 359.80 2000.00 1632.00 17671.5 11.22 630.308 4E+11 6.20 16.8 OK 110.53 300 OK

SLS (QP Comb.) 164.66 2000.00 1632.00 17671.5 17.19 737.205 5E+11 2.38 12.6 OK 49.62 300 OK

Section at deff from face of columne


SLS (R Comb.) 288.12 2000.00 1632.00 17671.5 10.83 621.842 4E+11 5.04 16.8 OK 88.65 300 OK

SLS (QP Comb.) 121.61 2000.00 1632.00 17671.5 17.19 737.20 5E+11 1.76 12.6 OK 36.65 300 OK

Section just below bearing


SLS (R Comb.) 8.79 2000.00 1632.00 17671.5 17.19 737.205 5E+11 0.13 16.8 OK 2.65 300 OK

SLS (QP Comb.) 8.79 2000.00 1632.00 17671.5 17.19 737.20 5E+11 0.13 12.6 OK 2.65 300 OK
I L
IV
C
A
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 134 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION
C) SLS CRACK WIDTH CHECK (QUASI PERMANENT LOAD COMBINATION)
1) CHECK A st,min for crack control

fct.eff = Max ( fctm, 2.9 ) Mpa

.
= 2.9 Mpa

TD
b h d Act =bh/2 s = fyk As,min =kc k fct,eff
Load mm mm mm mm2 Mpa Act / s As,provided
comb. mm mm mm mm2 Mpa k kc mm2 mm2 check
Section at face of columne
SLS QP 2000 1750 1562 1750000 500.00 0.65 0.4 2639 17671.5 OK h k
0 1
Section at deff from face of columne 0.3 1
SLS QP 2000 1750.0 1562.0 1750000 500.00 0.65 0.4 2639 17671.5 OK 0.8 0.65

S
3 0.65

EM
Section just below bearing
SLS QP 2000 1750.0 1562.0 1750000 500.00 0.65 0.4 2639 17671.5 OK

ST
2) CHECK FOR MAXIMUM SPACING b/w bars.

SY
Spacing b/w bars
Load comb. Bar dia cover Provided Calculated
eq c mm mm check

G
Section at face of columne
SLS QP 25 45 109.00 287.50 OK

IN
Section at deff from face of columne

R
SLS QP 25 45 109.00 287.50 OK

EE
Section just below bearing
SLS QP 25 45 109.00 287.50 OK
IN
G
EN
I L
IV
C
A
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 135 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

3) CHECK FOR CRACK WIDTH

smax =3.4c +
0.17Peff
hc,eff =Min [ 2.5 ( h peff = sm - cm =Max sc - kt

.
TD
- d ) , ( h - x/3 ) , Aceff = As/Ac,eff x =neutral
e = fct,eff ( 1+ e P,eff ) / P,eff ]
Load comb. h/2] hc,eff *b Asprovided sc axis depth kt Es/Ecm' /Es , 0.6sc/Es ] wk check
mm mm2 mm2 mm Mpa mm

.L
Section at face of columne
SLS QP 470 940000 17671.5 0.019 379.071 49.62 737.20 0.5 17.19 0.000149 0.056 OK

VT
Section at deff from face of columne
SLS QP 470 940000 17671.5 0.019 379.071 36.65 737.20 0.5 17.19 0.000110 0.042 OK

Section just below bearing


SLS QP 470 940000 17671.5 0.019 379.071 2.65 737.20 0.5 17.19 0.000008 0.003 OK

D) CHECK FOR SHEAR : ( IRC 112 / clause 10.3.2 (2) )


Check of Shear Reinforcement Requirement

VRdc =Max [ ( 0.12


k (80 1 fck )0.33 +
1 = Min [ Asl/bw

3/2

0.15 cp ) bw d ,
(min +0.15cp )
min = 0.031 k
k= Min [ 1 +
200/d , 2 ]

Check

d , 0.02 ]

bw d ]
fck1/2
VED VED cp

G
Load comb.  d bw Asl
T T mm mm mm2 Mpa Tonne
Section at face of columne
ULS 598.06 1 598.06 1632 2000 1.35 17671.5 0.0054 0.288 0 129.692 Provide shear reinf.

I
R
Section at deff from face of columne

EE
ULS 575.73 1 575.73 1632.00 2000 1.35 17671.5 0.0054 0.288 0 129.692 Provide shear reinf.

Section just below bearing


IN
ULS 586.01 1 586.01 1632.00 2000 1.35 17671.5 0.0054 0.288 0 129.692 Provide shear reinf.
G
EN
I L
IV
C
A
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 136 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16

.
Check for Maximum Shear Capacity :

D
2*VNS / (cw *
 = 0.5 sin [
Vrdmax = cw

bw * z * v1 *
-1
1 * fcd /2
* bw * z *

LT
 adopted
Load comb. VED bw d z =0.9d cw 1 Check

fcd) ]
T mm mm mm Tonne deg deg

T.
Section at face of columne
ULS 598.06 2000 1632 1468.8 1 0.6 1377.73 OK 12.86 45

PV
Section at deff from face of columne
ULS 575.73 2000 1632 1468.8 1 0.6 1377.73 OK 12.35 45

S
Section just below bearing

M
ULS 586.01 2000 1632 1468.8 1 0.6 1377.73 OK 12.59 45

TE
YS
EQUIVALENT SHEAR CALCULATION DUE TO TORSION :
t,i VED,i
Load comb. TED Ak tef,i =TED/(2 zi =h =t,i
Ak tef,i) *tef,i*zi

Tm m2 m Mpa m T
Section at face of columne
ULS 0.00 1.97 0.47 0.000 1.75 0.00

Section at deff from face of columne


ULS 0.00 1.97 0.47 0.000 1.75 0.00

Section just below bearing


ULS 0.00 1.97 0.47 0.000 1.75 0.00
I L
IV
C
A
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 137 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION
FINDING DESIGN SHEAR REINFORCEMENT REQUIREMENT :

Asw/s = VED /

Fd = 0.5 VED


w,min =( 0.072
z fywd cot
VED2 VED

w,min*s *bw
√ fck ) / fyk
VED1 Provide Asw

provide
Asw/s
Load comb. (Torsion =VED1+V bw z design

Asw,min =

.
(Flexure)
)

D
ED2

cot
Legs dia spacing

LT
T T T m m deg mm2/m mm2/m nos mm mm mm2/m Check T
Section at face of columne
ULS 598.06 0.00 598.06 2000 1468.8 45 10179.3 0.00085 170.4 10 12 100 11309.7 OK 299.03

T.
Section at deff from face of columne
ULS 575.73 0.00 575.73 2000 1468.8 45 9799.33 0.00085 170.4 10 12 100 11309.7 OK 287.87

PV
Section just below bearing
ULS 586.01 0.00 586.01 2000 1468.8 45 9974.29 0.00085 170.4 10 12 100 11309.7 OK 293.00

S
Fd = Additional Tensile force, to be accounted in longitudinal reinforcement

E
Calculation of horizontal stirrups for pier cap :

ST
Horizontal stirrups shall be provided in addition to the vertical stirrups.

SY
Minimum shear reinforcement in a section,

Asv > or = 0.4


b Sv 0.8 x fy

G
Asv for 10 legged 12 mm dia @ 125 mm stirrups = 1130.973355 mm2

IN
1130.973355 > or = 0.4
2000 x Sv 0.8 x 500
Sv < or = 565.4866776 mm

EE
Reqd spacing = 565.4866776 mm
Provided spacing = 125 mm
Provided 10 legged 12 mm dia @ 125 mm stirrups
Asv reqd < Asv provided
IN
G

FINDING DESIGN REINFORCEMENT REQUIREMENT FOR TORSION ONLY


Ast/st =TED /

EN
w,min =( 0.072
(2 Ak fyd cot

w,min*s *bw
√ fck ) / fyk

Provide Asw
provide
Asw/s

Load comb. TED bw Ak design


)

Asw,min =

Check
Legs dia spacing
L

Tm m m2 deg mm2/m mm2/m nos mm mm mm2/m


I

Section at face of columne


IV

ULS 0.00 2000 1.97 45 0 0.00085 255.6 2 16 150 2680.83 OK


C

Section at deff from face of columne


ULS 0.00 2000 1.97 45 0 0.00085 255.6 2 16 150 2680.83 OK
A

Section just below bearing


D

ULS 0.00 2000 1.97 45 0 0.00085 255.6 2 16 150 2680.83 OK


R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 138 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION
Check For Maximum Resistance For Combined Shear & Torsion :

TRDmax = Check

.
D
= 2  cw

VEd /VRd.max ≤
TEd/TRdmax +
Load comb. TED VED VRDmax 0.6*[1- cw Ak tef.i  fcd Ak tef.i

LT
fck/310] Sin Cos

1

Tm m2 T m2 m deg Tm

T.
Section at face of columne
ULS 0.00 598.06 1377.73 0.53 1 1.97 0.47 45 764.1 0.434 OK

PV
Section at deff from face of columne
ULS 0.00 575.73 1377.73 0.53 1 1.97 0.47 45 764.1 0.418 OK

S
Section just below bearing
ULS 0.00 586.01 1377.73 0.53 1 1.97 0.47 45 764.1 0.425 OK

EM
ST
Requirement of Longitudinal area of Reinf
TEd/tan/2/Ak
Asl /uk =

Area of steel provided Reinf. To be added with

SY
Load comb. TED uk Ak Ast, flexure reinf.
/fyd


Dia Spacing Provided Top
Ast
mm
2
mm mm /m Check width
Tm m m2 deg mm2 /m m mm2
Section at face of columne

IN
ULS 0.00 7.50 1.97 45 0.00 16 150 1340.41 OK 2.00 0.0

R
Section at deff from face of columne
ULS 0.00 7.50 1.97 45 0.00 16 150 1340.41 OK 2.00 0.0

EE
Section just below bearing
ULS 0.00 7.50 1.97 45 0.00 16 150 1340.41 OK 2.00 0.0
IN
G
EN
I L
IV
C
A
D
R

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD. Page 139 of 139


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
SUBSTRUCTURE FOR BAILEY BRIDGE AT HIMANK IN J&K STATE: CA No. CE(P) HMK-11/2015-16
DESIGN OF PIER CONSISTING OF MICRO PILE FOUNDATION

Special Notes

Recommendations provided by third party consultant which are given below to be


followed while execution

As an additional safety precaution, it is desirable to provide a scour protection around


the pile cap upto a length of 5 m from the edge. It is also recommended to apply
anti corrosion paints for the liners for the top 4 m of the micro pile.

One of the popular methods of scour protection is to provide geo mattress using stone
filled gabions. It is recommended to obtain the details of scour protection arrangement
from an hydraulic expert.

SPAR GEO INFRA PVT. LTD.


RDA CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.

Вам также может понравиться