Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
net/publication/274008756
CITATIONS READS
24 235
3 authors:
Yolanda Lechon
Centro Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas
164 PUBLICATIONS 758 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Creación, estandarización y mantenimiento de una base de datos de inventarios para el análisis de ciclo de vida de sistemas energéticos en España View project
ClimACT: Acting for the transition to a low-carbon economy in schools View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Diego García-Gusano on 06 April 2018.
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: During the past decade, the Spanish cement production industry has experienced constant techno-
Received 18 July 2014 logical updates. Nevertheless, meeting current and future environmental policy goals requires extra
Received in revised form efforts. The Spanish case is significant because cement production went down dramatically due to the
18 December 2014
last economic crisis. This brought an important, but temporary, reduction of CO2 emissions. Therefore,
Accepted 6 March 2015
Available online 14 March 2015
there is an interesting opportunity for cement producers and policymakers to adjust the long-term
targets. This work discusses the evolution of the cement industry in Spain from a realistic point of
view using recent cement demand projections and the TIMES-Spain energy optimisation model.
Keywords:
TIMES
Several environmental-friendly options were implemented in TIMES-Spain following a literature re-
Cement view. These measures, aimed at contributing to the decrease of emissions to meet the established
CO2 emissions policy goals, include energy efficiency improvements, substitution scenarios (both for fuel and ma-
Substitution terials) and CO2 capture (post-combustion and oxyfuel). From a policy approach, the deployment of
CO2 capture the EU ETS Directive entails that CO2 emissions from cement production will decrease by 8 Mt per year
from 2030 with respect to the case without Directive. In a more technology-specific analysis, a
remarkable decrease of 2e2.4 Mt CO2 was obtained in the material substitution scenario beyond 2030.
Additionally, taking into account current projections for cement demand, CO2 capture technology does
not emerge as a feasible option. Only if cement demand grew back to the pre-crisis level by 2050 and
the CO2 emission allowances remained fixed would the CO2 capture via post-combustion start to be a
reasonable alternative.
© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.027
0959-6526/© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.