Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
INSIGHT
M
argaret Thatcher’s with a progressive’s version would, he says, “likely lead mize monetary profits. plying those devices, War-
description of her- of Thatcher’s pugnacity that to the largest flight of capital She leavens her sentimen- ren would, inadvertently but
self as a “conviction caused one of her Conserva- GEORGE F. from the United States in tality with nostalgia: “When I inevitably, make govern-
politician” alarmed some tive colleagues to say that
Britons but delighted others “she can’t look at a British WILL history.”
Foreign investors — do-
was a kid, a minimum-wage
job in America would sup-
ment even more regressive.
Although Warren is criti-
because her convictions institution without hitting it mestic ones, too — will not port a family of three. It cized as “divisive,” serious
were incompatible with the with her handbag.” want to put wealth in corpo- would pay a mortgage, keep politics should divide the
flaccid centrist consensus Warren is too busy in- ism Act would produce the rations subservient to the the utilities on and put food polity by tugging its public
that had produced their na- veighing against “corrup- semi-nationalization of large political agendas of govern- on the table.” arguments up from the su-
tion’s 1970s stagnation. In tion” to define it precisely, corporations, with federal ment. And the agendas of Well. The Adam Smith In- perstitions and fetishes of
1979, voters rolled the dice, but she probably means charters requiring (among various “stakeholders” stitute’s Tim Worstall sug- identity politics, to the
sending her to Downing what economists call other things) 40 percent of deemed to have rights com- gests some pertinent realm of ideas. Columnist
Street. In Massachusetts rent-seeking, which in the their directors to be elected parable to those of share- arithmetic: When Warren Murray Kempton said that
Sen. Elizabeth Warren, Dem- context of politics means by employees. holders who actually own was 10 in 1959, the federal the similarity between
ocrats have their Thatcher, bending government power Such accountable-to-gov- corporations, and to whom hourly minimum wage ($1, American politics and pro-
if they dare. for private advantage, either ernment (not to markets) corporate directors have which would be $8.55 in fessional wrestling is the ab-
When elected leader of by conferring advantages on corporations must have “a the fiduciary duty to maxi- 2018 dollars) for 2,000 hours sence of honest emotion.
Britain’s Conservatives, oneself or imposing disad- material positive impact on mize their shares’ value. (40 hours a week for 50 Not the way Warren goes
Thatcher, disgusted by a col- vantages on competitors. society … when taken as a Warren exemplifies pro- weeks) would provide about it. She is a clenched-
league’s rhetorical mush Although Warren’s in- whole.” gressivism’s sentimental be- $2,000 a year, below the pov- fist candidate, boiling with
about a glorious “middle veighing is virtuous, her pro- This gaseous metric will lief in disinterested erty threshold ($2,324) for a indignation and bristling
way,” slammed onto a table gram would substantially be defined and applied by government that, unlike hu- family of three. with proposals, including
Friedrich Hayek’s tome “The exacerbate the problem by government. Such federal- man beings (except govern- Wielding one of the presi- some that are punitive to-
Constitution of Liberty” and deepening government’s in- ization of corporate law ment employees), has dent’s favorite adjectives ward disfavored Americans.
exclaimed, “this is what we volvement in the allocation would inevitably be the thin motives as pure as the (“rigged”), Warren says that Most progressives feel this
believe!” Today, with a forth- of wealth and opportunity. end of an enormous wedge driven snow. today’s government “works way, but most voters might
rightness perhaps more She was a registered Re- of government control, She should read his 2003 for those at the top.” Indeed. prefer someone who will
bracing than prudent, War- publican from 1991 to 1996 crowding out market sig- essay “What Is Public Sprawling, complex, opaque, lower the political tempera-
ren advocates a radical because “I thought that nals. As would her Climate Choice Theory?”, wherein redistributionist govern- ture by lowering the stakes
agenda that is approxi- those were the people who Risk Disclosure Act. And her economist James M. Bu- ment usually does: It redis- of politics.
mately Thatcherism — capi- best supported markets.” American Housing and Eco- chanan, a Nobel laureate,
talism Today, she favors “big struc- nomic Mobility Act. And her used economic reasoning — ———
invigorated — inverted. Fur- tural change.” Affordable Drug Manufactur- determining how incentives George F. Will writes for The Washington Post.
thermore, Warren bristles Her Accountable Capital- ing Act (government-run influence behavior — to de- Reach him at georgewill@washpost.com.