Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
2 CULTURE PROJECTS
SECOND CULTURAL
CITIZENSHIP
TOP CULTURAL-CITIZEN BRANDS
SURVEY
OF 2017
Q3 From which of the following activities do brands benefit the most? Answered:
It is very positive for both the arts and 77 Skipped: 9
for brands
suggests, brands will have to grapple
Q3 From which Q3
50%of the following
From 17%
which activities do brands
of the following benefit
activities dothe most?
brands benefit the m
It is quite positive for both the arts and for brands, with caveats
with whether “to support artists taking a
It is neutral;77neither
Answered: a cause
Skipped: 9 for concern, nor positive
polarizing stand.”
Answered: 77
It is somewhat Skipped:
of a cause9 forAnswered:
concern; it77can be okay, but
Skipped: 9 needs to be developed carefully
It is definitely a cause for concern; brand patronage is problematic and should be avoided
SHARED VALUES
30%
ANSWER CHOICES Politics aside, harmonizing art and R
CULTURAL CITIZENSHIP SURVEY 2018
commerce is always a challenge. A
Skipped: 9
It is definitely a cause for concern; brand patronage is problematic and should be avoidedbenefit can be quickly
veteran. “Public 0
3% 4% eroded when the institution’s mission is
TOTAL
compromised by having to worry about
Corporate collections Corporate sponsorships (e.g. exhibition support)
patron engagement instead of artistic
Corporate art initiatives Art editions excellence.”
35%collections
Corporate Corporate sponsorships (e.g. exhibition support)
ANSWER
Corporate CHOICES
collections
Corporate art initiatives Corporate
Corporatesponsorships
collections (e.g. exhibition
Art editions A respondent
Corporate support)
sponsorships who manages
(e.g. exhibition arts
support) part-
RESPONSES
WHAT WORKS?
Visibility 0.00% 1.39% 13.89% 30.56% 54.17%
0 1 10 22 more likely
39 72 to be satisfied with en-
Expressing company’s values/brand ideals 0.00% 2.78% 15.28% 34.72% gaging with the cultural sector. Other
47.22%
0 2 11 25 34 72
Giving back to the community (social responsibility)
Given concerns
4.17%
about 16.67%
11.11%
“one-off”
20.83%
mentioned rationales likewise point
47.22%
partnerships3and short-term
8 12 thinking,
15 to brand
34 72 perceptions: “expressing
it’s no surprise that respondents once innovation” (41% “high” benefit) and
again rate
1/2 systematic corporate spon- earning “loyalty as stronger emotional
sorships—e.g., “exhibition support” connection with customers” (40%). By
(35%) and, especially, “corporate art contrast, “ability to extract premium
initiatives” (59%)—as the most bene- pricing” comes in last (8% see high
ficial form of engagement. Only 3 out benefit). Still, more than a third of the
of 77 respondents consider art collec- respondents see “some” potential for
tions as the best—reflecting, perhaps, extracting premium pricing, and close
difficulties in leveraging collections via to half of those in the survey see a
communications and programs. potential for art projects to spur “direct
“Art editions” fare worse. A mere two client acquisition”(moderate 21%, and
respondents, or 3%, rate them as most high 25%).
CITIZENSHIP
Increase in
Increase in brand awareness
brand
awareness
Value of
Value of earned media coverage
earned
media... But how to evaluate a brand’s engage-
Increase in brand’s authenticity
Increase in
brand’s...
ment? The survey attempts to unpack
this question in two ways.
Increase in awareness/connection
Increasetoin
awareness/co...
main target group
Increase inIncrease
loyaltyin
“the degree to which a company’s own
loyalty
PR includes arts and culture” (29%
Anecdotal testimonials of client and
Anecdotal
testimonials...
rated as 10 on a 10-point scale from
target-group satisfaction
Number of “not important” to “extremely import-
Number of new clients acquired
new
clients... ant”); “number of years active in art”;
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% “existence of a separate foundation
wholly or partly dedicated to the arts”
NOT IMPORTANT 2 3 4 EXTREMELY IMPORTANT (26% rated as 10); and “arts expen-
NOT 2 3 4 EXTREMELY diture
TOTALas percentage of total company
IMPORTANT IMPORTANT
Artist’s satisfaction with the project 0.00% 4.23% 7.04% 22.54%
revenues”
66.20%
(25% rated as 10).
0 3 5 16 47 71
Art world approval (critical response) 1.39% 5.56% 22.22% 31.94% 38.89%of resources is the ranking indicator of
The respondents 1
note4 other16 intangible
23
cultural
28 72
citizenship. This explains why
benefits of1cultural
/2 engagement, from one-off projects that are not part of a
“shareholder and employee morale” to coherent long-term strategy usually
“soft political influence.” “Letting the fail to secure cultural validation for the
art itself question our typical ways of brands that try them.
doing business” can inspire a compa-
ny’s work, a communications profes- On the other hand, we also inquired
sional suggests. “Building a stronger about how to measure the success of
emotional connection with employees” specific art-brand collaborations. The
is rated as a benefit by 46% of the “artist’s satisfaction with the project” is
respondents, with 22% claiming a seen as the most important measure by
high level of benefit. An internationally far. No less than 89% of respondents
prominent curator suggests that arts rated it, on a 1-to-10 scale, as being
engagement can help a brand partici- very or extremely important.
HOW THE POLL WAS CONDUCTED omitted some answers. The initial list of 100 and project coordination: Laura Zarta, Mariana
The online poll was administered on Survey- brands was compiled on the basis of desk re- Rivera, Laura Noguera. Copy editor: Myles
Monkey during the first eight months of 2018. search and preliminary input from experts. We McDonnell
The 77 respondents comprise professionals do not claim that the list here represents all cul-
involved in art-brands collaborations from the turally active brands. We invite brands seeking The information herein is based on sources
brand side, from an agency or as a consultant, to be included in the analysis to contact Culture believed to be reliable. However, we do not
as an artist or art organization representative, Projects at info@cultureprojects.art. accept any liability for any loss or damage
or from the fields of marketing-communications resulting from its use. The information rep-
and academic study of arts and marketing. CULTURE PROJECTS resents best efforts to compile data based on
Culture Projects develops and publishes available information and opinions provided
Approximately 40% of respondents have been original research and insight into current trends by the participants in our survey. All experts
involved in 6 to 20 art-brand collaborations; in arts and culture and offers strategic counsel in the poll will remain anonymous. This
approximately 25% have been involved in more to institutions, companies, and government document is not intended for distribution,
than 20 projects. About half of the respondents entities seeking to maximize the value of their publication, or use in any jurisdiction where
were from the United States, with the other half engagement with the arts. such distribution, publication, or use would
hailing from a variety of countries, including be unlawful, nor is it aimed at any person or
Switzerland, the U.K., Germany, France, CULTURAL CITIZENSHIP PROJECT entity to whom it would be unlawful to address
Canada, China, Italy, and Russia. More than The Cultural Citizenship Project provides such a document.
85% have been involved in the field for 5 to 10 fact-based analyses of engagement between
years; one-third of the respondents have been commercial brands and the arts, drawing on For feedback and inquiries:
“closely following art-brand collaborations” for the opinions of an anonymous panel of interna- www.cultureprojects.art
more than 15 years. tional experts and quantitative assessment of info@cutureprojects.art
polling and business data.
We asked 23 questions—eight closed-ended All data, conclusions, and materials copy-
and four open-ended ones. Sixty-six respon- Project team: András Szántó, Masha Sergeeva, right Culture Projects ©Culture Projects.
dents answered the survey in full, a minority Ian Charles Stewart, Adam Levine. Research Released January 2019
Even so, some insiders offer measured approval, acknowledging Koons’s media savvy and Louis Vuitton’s “clever” marketing.
This was about “Jeff Koons being obnoxious,” an art-world veteran says, “and obnoxious is on-brand for Jeff Koons.” A U.S.
museum curator suggests: “Jeff Koons is as much a brand as LV, so this made perfect sense. I wouldn’t call it high culture. But
it’s pure popular culture.”
A Paris-based luxury advisor goes further: “Koons was making fun of Vuitton as well, which is great”; moreover, the artist pulled
off a first: “One can appropriate the greatest images in human history only once!”
For LV, the project was hailed as a marketing coup. As the Fashionista blog reported, “In its earnings report, LVMH once again
emphasized the success of Louis Vuitton’s collaborations with Jeff Koons and Supreme this year.”
Several marketing experts in our survey are full-throated in their praise. “I was surprised by the collaboration,” says a spon-
sorship manager of a global art organization, “and that LV, for the first time, changed the initials on their iconic pattern for Jeff
Koons—that is a huge statement from the company!” A classic luxury brand’s marketing chief is impressed with “the sheer
size, scope, and perfection of this project.” Another marketing professional praises Koons’s “unapologetic” and “totally sincere”
approach.
Whatever one’s view, there is no doubt, as this spectrum of impassioned responses suggests, that Jeff Koons and Louis Vuitton
succeeded—not for the first time—in galvanizing attention and controversy with their deft mingling of luxury marketing and art.
PROJECTS AT THE
FRONTIER OF ART
AND BRANDS
The following pages feature a representative selection of
projects originated and supported by brands in 2017. We
included a maximum of one project per company. By no
means intended to be a comprehensive survey of the field,
these examples offer a taste of the evolution in range and
diversity of collaborations between brands and the arts.
BANK OF AMERICA’S
FREE MUSEUM PROGRAM
SUPPORTED ACCESS TO ART
BP COLLABORATED WITH
LONDON’S NATIONAL PORTRAIT
GALLERY ON A PORTRAIT AWARD
HYUNDAI SUPPORTED
SUPERFLEX’S TURBINE HALL
COMMISSION
RUINART COMMISSIONED A
WORK FROM JAUME PLENSA
WETRANSFER LAUNCHED A
CONTENT PLATFORM SHARING
STORIES OF ARTISTS AND
CREATIVES
HOW THE POLL WAS CONDUCTED omitted some answers. The initial list of 100 and project coordination: Laura Zarta, Mariana
The online poll was administered on Survey- brands was compiled on the basis of desk re- Rivera, Laura Noguera. Copy editor: Myles
Monkey during the first eight months of 2018. search and preliminary input from experts. We McDonnell
The 77 respondents comprise professionals do not claim that the list here represents all cul-
involved in art-brands collaborations from the turally active brands. We invite brands seeking The information herein is based on sources
brand side, from an agency or as a consultant, to be included in the analysis to contact Culture believed to be reliable. However, we do not
as an artist or art organization representative, Projects at info@cultureprojects.art. accept any liability for any loss or damage
or from the fields of marketing-communications resulting from its use. The information rep-
and academic study of arts and marketing. CULTURE PROJECTS resents best efforts to compile data based on
Culture Projects develops and publishes available information and opinions provided
Approximately 40% of respondents have been original research and insight into current trends by the participants in our survey. All experts
involved in 6 to 20 art-brand collaborations; in arts and culture and offers strategic counsel in the poll will remain anonymous. This
approximately 25% have been involved in more to institutions, companies, and government document is not intended for distribution,
than 20 projects. About half of the respondents entities seeking to maximize the value of their publication, or use in any jurisdiction where
were from the United States, with the other half engagement with the arts. such distribution, publication, or use would
hailing from a variety of countries, including be unlawful, nor is it aimed at any person or
Switzerland, the U.K., Germany, France, CULTURAL CITIZENSHIP PROJECT entity to whom it would be unlawful to address
Canada, China, Italy, and Russia. More than The Cultural Citizenship Project provides such a document.
85% have been involved in the field for 5 to 10 fact-based analyses of engagement between
years; one-third of the respondents have been commercial brands and the arts, drawing on For feedback and inquiries:
“closely following art-brand collaborations” for the opinions of an anonymous panel of interna- www.cultureprojects.art
more than 15 years. tional experts and quantitative assessment of info@cutureprojects.art
polling and business data.
We asked 23 questions—eight closed-ended All data, conclusions, and materials copy-
and four open-ended ones. Sixty-six respon- Project team: András Szántó, Masha Sergeeva, right Culture Projects ©Culture Projects.
dents answered the survey in full, a minority Ian Charles Stewart, Adam Levine. Research Released January 2019