Assessment Report on Post ECPTs at ESS

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 Introduction .....................................................................................................................................1
1.1 General .....................................................................................................................................1
1.2 Project Performance Criteria.....................................................................................................1
2 ESS Details ......................................................................................................................................1
3 Post ECPTs .....................................................................................................................................2
4 Liquefaction Analysis.....................................................................................................................2
5 Estimated Bearing Capacity ..........................................................................................................2
6 Estimated Settlement .....................................................................................................................3

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 Layout of VC Points and ECPTs ................................................................................................2

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Details of ESS .............................................................................................................................1
Table 2 Location Coordinates of Post ECPTs ..........................................................................................2
Table 3 Estimated Bearing Capacity of VC Treated Soil .........................................................................3
Table 4 Estimated Settlement of VC Treated Soil....................................................................................3

LIST OF ENCLOSURES
Annexure I: Layout of VC Works at ESS
Annexure II: Field Records of Pre and Post ECPTs
Annexure III: Liquefaction Analysis of Post ECPTs
Annexure IV: Bearing Capacity Calculations
Annexure V: Settlement Calculations

Page i
Assessment Report on Post ECPTs at ESS

1 Introduction
1.1 General
Indian Institute of Technology Patna (IIT Patna) is expanding the infrastructure with the
construction of academic and residential buildings under Phase II at IIT Patna in Bihta, Bihar.
As a part of expansion, 14 nos. of structures are proposed (Ground Floor to G+8 storeyed
buildings) on open / pile foundations. M/s NCC is the main contractor for this project and
CPWD Patna is the project management (execution agency) for IIT Patna. In this regard, M/s
NCC approached Keller Ground Engineering India Pvt Ltd (Keller) to design and execute the
Ground Improvement works using Vibro Compaction technique to mitigate liquefaction below
the proposed foundation systems.
As a part of scope of work, Keller carried out Vibro Compaction (VC) at proposed Electric
Sub Station (ESS) which is one of the proposed structures.
This document summarises the Post Electric Cone Penetration Tests (ECPTs) conducted at
ESS, liquefaction assessment with bearing capacity and settlement after improvement.

1.2 Project Performance Criteria

Performance criteria of proposed structures is given below:
 Liquefaction : FOS>1.0
o Seismic Zone : IV
o Earthquake Magnitude : 6.5
o PGA : 0.24g

2 ESS Details
The proposed ESS consists of 1 block with ground floor. VC was carried out in a triangular
grid pattern of 3.00m c/c spacing according to drawing, KE/187/930/11/DWG/016 rev 1
“Layout of Vibro Compaction Works at ESS Building” which is appended in Annexure I.
Building details, received via mail dated 28.11.2018, and treatment details are given in Table
1 and layout in Figure 1.
Table 1 Details of ESS

Building Name Footprint Area (m2) Depth of Treatment 1.5m below EGL

ESS Building 701 8.25m

1
Assessment Report on Post ECPTs at ESS

Figure 1 Layout of VC Points and ECPTs

3 Post ECPTs
A total of two Post ECPTs was conducted in ESS as shown in Figure 1 with location
coordinates in Table 2. Improvement in qc is seen throughout the depth of exploration for all
units. However, some layers of small thickness (<0.2m) are showing lower than Pre ECPTs
which can be attributed to higher fines at that depth. Field records of Pre and Post ECPTs
are appended in Annexure II.
Table 2 Location Coordinates of Post ECPTs

Location Coordinates
S No ECPT No RL (m)
Easting Northing

1 Post ECPT 26 283819.776 2825890.092 +59.430

2 Post ECPT 26A 283835.634 2825873.101 +59.370

4 Liquefaction Analysis
Liquefaction analysis is carried out based on the Post ECPTs conducted in the treatment
area and satisfies the performance requirement mentioned in Section 1.2. As per Pre ECPT
26, top 1.5m is having higher fines fraction. These layers are not susceptible to liquefaction.
Liquefaction analysis is appended in Annexure III.

5 Estimated Bearing Capacity

The estimated bearing capacity for different square footing sizes of 1.5m, 2.0m, 2.5m and
3.0m are carried out as per Post ECPT 26A. Foundation level has been kept at 2m below
EGL, fixed as per Pre ECPT 26, at RL +57.800m. Stress bulb for footing is taken as 1.5
times the width of footing. The average cone penetration resistance at every 1m interval is
determined. For this cone resistance, equivalent SPT N value is determined by taking ratio of

2
Assessment Report on Post ECPTs at ESS

cone resistance to SPT N value as 450. The Factor of Safety is taken as 2.5. Summary of
the same is given in Table 3. Detailed calculations are appended in Annexure IV.
Table 3 Estimated Bearing Capacity of VC Treated Soil

Building Footing Size Estimated Bearing Capacity (T/m2)

1.5m x 1.5m 26.7

2.0m x 2.0m 30.0

ESS Building
2.5m x 2.5m 34.0

3.0m x 3.0m 35.9

6 Estimated Settlement
Settlement calculations are carried out as per IS 8009: Part I: 1976 reaffirmed 1998.
Calculations are done for estimated bearing capacity for isolated footings. Summary of the
same is given in Table 4 and detailed calculations with assumptions in Annexure V.
Table 4 Estimated Settlement of VC Treated Soil

Building Footing Size Estimated Settlement (mm)

1.5m x 1.5m 6.8

2.0m x 2.0m 9.6

ESS Building
2.5m x 2.5m 12.7

3.0m x 3.0m 16.0

The above bearing capacities and settlements are estimated for assumed isolated footing
sizes based on Post ECPTs carried out at site. However, the footing sizes and settlements
shall be recommended by the project geotechnical consultant based on their interpretations
and structural tolerance limits in ultimate and serviceable limit state.

3
Assessment Report on Post ECPTs at ESS

Annexure I: Layout of VC Works at ESS

 254800
254800

343550
343550

C
C REFERENCE
REFERENCE LINE
LINE'CD'
'CD'

LVL LVL LVL

LVL
LVL
LVL LVL
LVL
LVL

LVL LVL

LVL

REFERENCE
REFERENCE LINE
LINE'BC'
'BC'
B
B LVL
LVL MATCH
MATCH
LVL
LINE-
LINE-AA'
AA'

LVL
LVL

LVL

ESS
LVL

LVL
STARTING
STARTINGPOINT
POINTISIS
PP INTERSECTION
INTERSECTIONOF
LVL
OFROAD
ROAD
EDGE
EDGE
LVL
MATCH
MATCH
LINE-
LINE-AA'
AA' LVL

LVL
P1P1 LVL
LVL

LVL
REF.
REF.LINE
LINEEDGE
EDGE
OF THE ROAD
OF THE ROAD

LVL LVL

REF. LINE EDGE

REF. LINE EDGE
OFOFTHE
THEROAD
ROAD
LVL

90°
LVL
LVL

98°
LVL
AA
LVL

LVL

BB
LVL

CENTER
LVL CENTER
LINE
LINE

14
LVL
REFERENCE
REFERENCE LINE
LINE'CD'
'CD'
LVL
GG

REFERENCE
REFERENCE LINE
LINE'AB'
'AB' LVL LVL

LVL
XX
REFERENCE
REFERENCE
LINE
LINE

6 CENTER
CENTER
LVL

LVL

LVL
FF
LINE
LINE
LVL D
D

5
HH

10
LVL

V10
W4

W4 W4 UP UP

MALE MALE

W4
DV1 Entrance
Entrance
W4

LVL

TD2
TD2
3700
TOI.
TD2 x 3250
3700 x 3250
TOI. 2125 x 1575
CHANGING
TD1 MALE
CHANGING
D2 MALE FHC FHC
W4 CB

D'
V9

W4
W4 1500
wc
TD1 x 1050wc
1500 x 1050wc
wc 10501500 x 10502125 x 1575 CB W4

AA
D'
W4 FEMALE FEMALE
TOI.
FEMALE TOI.
D2 D1 W4

1200 x 2075
CHANGING 2225x 2075
DRINKINGWATER
1200
CHANGING
FEMALEx 1700
2225 x 1700
DRINKINGWATER LockerLocker W4

UP UP D1 2960x4950
2960x4950

REF.
REF.LINE
LINEOFOFEXISTING
EXISTING
19°19°
V8 W4 Locker

W4 2960x4950
2960x4950
Locker W4

W4 V8 BUILDING
BUILDINGEDGE
EDGE
Workshop STARTING
STARTING

19°
Y Workshop
Lvl
Y +
Lvl600
+ 600
CENTER
CENTER
LINE
V7

W4
W4 UP UP

W4 POINT
POINT PP
LVLLINE
W4

REF.
REF. LINE
LINEOFOFEXISTING
EXISTING

V7
6000 6000

BUILDING
BUILDINGEDGE
EDGE LVL
YY V6 RS2 UP UP

YY

W4
W4

W4
W4

V6

V5 V7

EE

W4
W4 W4

CENTER
CENTERLINE
LINE
54000
54000
W4 W4 W4 W4 DV1

W4
V5 TD2
TD1 W4 W4

V6 TD2 D2 W4 W4 PARALLEL
PARALLELTOTOEXISTING
EXISTING

V4

TD1
W4

W4
W4
D2 W4

REFERENCE
REFERENCE BOUNDARY
BOUNDARYWALL
WALL

W4

W4

D1
W4

W4 W4

E'E' LINE
LINE

V4

V5
D1

V3
W4 W4

43500
43500

W4
W4 W4 W4 W4

W4

W4
W4
RS2 V3 RS2

V2 W4 V4 W4

W4 W4 UP UP W4 W4

W4 W4

D1 V2 REF.
REF.LINE
LINEOFOFEXISTING
EXISTING
BUILDING EDGE LVL
37750
37750
V1 W4 HANDS
STORE
TOOL TOOL
HANDS V3

2960X4950
2960X4950
STORED1 D1 W4 W4 W4 BUILDING EDGE
LVL STORE
MATERIAL
STORE
MATERIAL

W4
W4
W4 W4 W4 W4

C'C' 2960X4950
2960X4950

V1
RS1

H1 UP Entrance
UP EntranceW4 MATERIAL
MATERIAL

FHC FHC
CB CB 6050 STORE
STORE6050
X 4950
X 4950

V2
W4 W4 W4 W4

CENTER
CENTER
XXX

H2
W4 W4 W4

H3

H4 CC H5
H1 B'B' H2 V1
D1
W4

LINE
LINE

RS2
W4

LVL
START
START

W4
D1 D1 W4

BB MATCH
MATCH

H3
W4 W4

REF.LINE
REF.LINEEDGE
EDGEOFOF
THE BUILDING
STARTING
STARTING
H4

H5 A'A' RS1

W4

H1
THE BUILDING POINT
POINT
W4 W4 W4

POINT
POINT
H2 W4

A
A AA LINE-BB'
LINE-BB'
H3

REF. LINE OF EXISTING

PP H4

H5

BUILDING EDGE

REF.LINE EDGE OF
REF.LINE EDGE OF
THETHE
BUILDING
BUILDING

LVL

REF.
REF.LINE
LINE(D'E')
(D'E')40M
40MAWAY
AWAY
LVL
FROM
FROMBOUNDARY
BOUNDARYWALL WALL
PP PARALLEL
PARALLEL TO TOTHE
THESAME
SAME
REF.
REF.LINE
LINEOFOFEXISTING
EXISTING
STARTING
STARTING
BUILDING
BUILDING
POINT EDGE
EDGE
POINT

3 CENTRAL
CENTRAL
LINE
LINE
LVL

7
LVL
7500
7500

15000
15000

LVL

15000
15000
AA 19500
19500

LVL
1000
1000
7500
7500
CORNER
CORNEROFOF
BOUNDARY
BOUNDARYWALL
WALL

BB

8
LVL

LVL
CENTRAL
CENTRAL XX
LINE
LINE
83°
CC

33°
R29250
YY LVL
CENTRAL
CENTRAL
LINE
LINE
AA
CENTER
CENTER LVL
LINE
LINE

STARTING
STARTING
PP STARTING
STARTING
POINT
POINT
POINT
POINT
PP P1P1
LVL

REF.
REF.LINE
LINEOFOFEXHITING
EXHITING
CENTER
CENTER BUILDING EDGE
BUILDING EDGE
LINE
LINE
STARTING PP
STARTING LVL
POINT
POINT

Slope
LVL

Slope
Slope

Slope
Slope
Slope
Slope
LVL

REF.
REF.LINE
LINEOFOFEXISTING
EXISTING PP EXISTING
EXISTINGBOYS
BOYSHOSTEL
HOSTEL REF.
REF.LINE
LINEOFOFEXISTING
EXISTING
BUILDING
BUILDINGEDGE
EDGE STARTING
STARTING
G+7
G+7 BUILDING
BUILDINGEDGE
EDGE

4
PP POINT
POINT LVL
Slope
Slope
STARTING
REF.
REF.LINE
LINE(D'E')
(D'E')40M
40MAWAY
AWAY
STARTING
CENTER
CENTER
POINT
POINT Slope
Slope
FROM
FROMBOUNDARY
BOUNDARYWALL WALL
LINE
LINE
LVL
Slope
Slope
LINE
CENTER
CENTER
LINEOFOFTHE
THEROAD
ROAD
PARALLEL
PARALLEL TO TOTHE
THESAME
SAME BOUNDARY
BOUNDARYWALL
WALL
ALIGNMENT
ALIGNMENT
LVL

Slope
Slope
CENTER
CENTER
LINE
LINEOFOFBUILDING
BUILDING
PARALLEL
PARALLELTOTOROAD
ROAD

100850
LVL

EE

P1P1 R54500
LVL EE

39400
R44400
REF.
REF.LINE
LINEOFOFUNDER
UNDER
PROPOSED
PROPOSEDCYCLE
CYCLEPARKING
PARKING LVL

38°
CONSTRUCTION
CONSTRUCTIONBUILDING
EDGE
EDGE
BUILDING
EXISTING
EXISTINGCYCLE
CYCLEPARKING
PARKING
AA 38° REFERENCE
LINE
REFERENCE
120450
58150 6.0
6.0MMWD
WD ROAD
ROAD
LINE
CHECK ON SITE LVL
BB 8350 EQ
6.0
6.0MMWD
WDROAD
ROAD EQ
E'
E'
DD AA

CC LVL

16450
CHECK ON SITE

9
EQ EQ
LVL

2
LVL
MAIN
MAINENTRY
ENTRY

70000
70000
CENTER
CENTER LVL
LINE
LINEOFOFTHE
THEROAD
ROAD

PROPOSED
PROPOSEDCYCLE
CYCLEPARKING
PARKING PROPOSED
PROPOSEDCYCLE
CYCLEPARKING
PARKING LVL

EQ EQ
6.0
6.0MMWD
WDROAD

9000

9000
ROAD
EQ EQ CENTRAL
CENTRAL LVL
CENTER
CENTER
LINE OF BUILDING LINE
LINE
LINE OF BUILDING
PARALLEL
PARALLELTOTOROAD
ROAD

14100
51100

8500

8500
CYCLE
CYCLE
PARKING
PARKING
SHED
SHED
AND
AND CYCLE
CYCLE
PARKING
PARKING
SHED
SHED
AND
AND
LANDSCAPED
LANDSCAPED
AREA
AREA LANDSCAPED
LANDSCAPEDAREA
AREA EQ EQ
11200 11200

SWIMMING
SWIMMINGPOOL
POOL
DINING
DININGBLOCK
BLOCK 50.00M X 25.00M
50.00M X 25.00M
16350 16350
CENTRAL LINE OF
CENTRAL LINE OF
SERVICE
SERVICEROAD
ROAD SWIMMING
SWIMMINGPOOL
POOL

11200 11200

30150
8500

8500
REFERENCE
REFERENCE
LINE
LINE

LANDSCAPED
LANDSCAPEDAREA/BUFFER
AREA/BUFFERZONE
ZONE 57900
AA BB

CENTRAL
CENTRAL
LINE
LINE

PP
STARTING
STARTING
POINT
POINT

82700
PARALLEL
PARALLELTOTO
PROPOSED
PROPOSEDROAD
ROAD

SITE
CHECK45600
ON
24150
EXISTING BOUNDARY24150
WALL TOTAL=70131+1450X3-36=74445
TOTAL=70131+1450X3-36=74445
SQM SQM
EXISTING BOUNDARY WALL

PARALLEL
PARALLELTOTOEXISTING
EXISTING
BOUNDARY
BOUNDARYWALLWALL
DD BUILDING
BUILDINGEDGE
EDGE
STARTING
STARTING
POINT
POINT
48000
48000

CHECK
27100
ON
SITE

DGDGSETSETAREA
AREA
BUILDING
BUILDING
BUILDING
EDGE
EDGE
EDGE

BB
CC
63900
CHECK ON SITE
11
AA

70250
52950

40100

CHECK ON SITE
REF.
REF.LINE
LINEPARALLEL
PARALLELTOTO
EXISTING BUILDING EDGE
EXISTING BUILDING EDGE

25900
REF.
REF.LINE
LINEOFOFEXISTING
EXISTING
BUILDING
BUILDINGEDGE
EDGE
STARTING
STARTING

45°
P2P2 REF.
REF.LINE
LINEOFOFEXISTING
EXISTING
POINT
POINT
PP
BUILDING
BUILDINGEDGE
EDGE
17700 60700
P1P1
STARTING
STARTING
POINT
POINT

12

STARTING
STARTING STARTING
STARTING
REF.
REF.LINE
LINEOFOFEXISTING
EXISTING
POINT
POINT P1P1 P2P2 POINT
POINT
BUILDING
BUILDINGEDGE
EDGE

PRE ECPT 26 REF. LINE OF EXISTING

REF. LINE OF EXISTING
BUILDING
BUILDINGEDGE
EDGE
STARTING
STARTING
POINT P1P1
POINT

REF.
REF.
REF.LINE
BUILDING
BUILDINGEDGE

REF.LINE
13
LINEOFOFEXISTING
EDGE
EXISTING

LINEOFOFEXISTING
BUILDING
BUILDINGEDGE
EDGE
EXISTING
STARTING P2P2
STARTING
POINT
POINT

P3P3 STARTING
STARTING
POINT
POINT
ALIGN
ALIGNWITH
EXISTING
WITH
EXISTINGBUILDING
ALIGN

BUILDING
ALIGNWITH
WITH
EXISTING
EXISTINGBUILDING
BUILDING

KEY PLAN
VIBRO COMPACTION
@ 3.0 C/C SPACING

74
IN TRIANGULAR PATTERN

24.
51.56 EGL (AS PER SITE CONDITION)
0.0
POST ECPT 26 1
122
°
1.5
SILTY
CUT-OFF LEVEL OF
LEGEND
9 25 41 57 73 89 105 121 137 153
SAND VIBRO COMPACTION
2.0

(VARIES AS PER THE TABLE 1)

1 17 33 49 65 81 97 113 129 145

TREATMENT DEPTH OF
10 26 42 58 74 90 106 122 138 154

VIBRO COMPACTION
2 18 34 50 66 82 98 114 130 146

3
11 27 43 59 75 91 107 123 139 155
3 19 35 51 67 83 99 115 131 147
12 28 44 60 76 92 108 124 140 156

23.76
4 20 36 52 68 84 100 116 132 148 SAND
13 29 45 61 77 93 109 125 141 157 3
TREATMENT LINE 5 21 37 53 69 85 101 117 133 149 VIBRO COMPACTION POINTS 3.0m C/C
14 30 46 62 78 94 110 126 142 158 SPACING IN TRIANGULAR PATTERN
6 22 38 54 70 86 102 118 134 150
15 31 47 63 79 95 111 127 143 159
7 23 39 55 71 87 103 119 135 151
16 32 48 64 80 96 112 128 144 160
13.0
8 24 40 56 72 88 104 120 136 152

VIBRO COMPACTION POINTS POST ECPT 26A 1 CLAY

@ 3.0m C/C SPACING
IN TRIANGULAR PATTERN

1 Table 3- Setting out Co-ordinates for

PLAN LAYOUT OF VIBRO COMPACTION POINTS AT ESS BUILDING TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OF VIBRO COMPACTION WORKS Post ECPTs Points at ESS Building
TOTAL NO. OF VIBRO COMPACTION POINTS = 160 NOS. Point No. Easting Northing
SCALE 1:400
26 283819.776 2825890.092
26A 283835.634 2825873.101

Table 1- Area Statement

Depth of Treatment from

Table 2- Setting out Co-ordinates for Foot Print Area Width of Treatment from Area of Treatment
Structure Name No. of Units No. of Blocks 1.5m below Ground Level
Vibro Compaction Points at ESS (m²) Footprint Area (m) (m²)
(m)
Point No. Easting Northing
1 283817.674 2825906.704 ESS 1 1 701 8.25 3.88 1225

8 283801.463 2825893.355
41 283827.089 2825897.630 NOTES :-
1. All the dimensions are in meter unless otherwise specified.
48 283810.879 2825884.281
2. The width of treatment outside the footprint shall be half of the liquefaction depth below footing level.
81 283834.189 2825886.649 3. Setting out co-ordinates of building footprint based on email dated: 01.12.2018., received from M/s.NCC.
88 283817.979 2825873.299 4. Penetration with vibrator shall be done after excavating 0.5m from Existing Ground Level in treatment Area based on
site conditions.
113 283840.796 2825878.627
5. This drawing shall be read in conjunction with the following reference drawings:
120 283824.585 2825865.277 i) Dwg.No.SGA-18001-R-S2-MP-01, dated: 11.04.2018
153 283850.212 2825869.552 ii) Master Plan layout drawing, received via email dated: 28.08.2018. and individual structure plan layout drawing
160 283834.001 2825856.203 received via email dated: 25.09.2018.
CLIENT : PROJECT MANAGEMENT: MAIN CONTRACTOR : Ground Engineering Specialist Contractors: Keller Ground Engineering India Pvt Ltd.
International 7th Floor,Eastern Wing
Centennial Square, 6A Dr. Ambedkar Road,
Geotechnical Kodambakkam, Chennai - 600 024
DWG NO: KE/187/930/11/DWG/016 Sheet 1 Sheet: A3 Scale: As Shown
Contractors Tel: +91 44 2480 7500
Fax: +91 44 2480 7501
www.kellerindia.com
Note: The dimensions and co-ordinates mentioned in the above drawing are prepared based on the Drawn : Jabeen Amar PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
reference drawings received from the Customer. Hence, the correctness of the dimensions or
Dated :
SIGN & DATE
1 23.01.2019 Post ECPTs Included
CONSTRUCTION OF ACADEMIC & RESIDENTIAL COMPLEXES UNDER PHASE-II AT IIT PATNA,
co-ordinates lies with the Customer's drawing.
Drawings and sketches may not, without our permission, be copied or reproduced nor be handed Checked :
23.01.2019

Nishanth 0 03.12.2018 For Approval INDIAN INSTITUTE OF CENTRAL PUBLIC WORKS NAGARJUNA CONSTRUCTION GROUND IMPROVEMENT USING VIBRO COMPACTION WORKS FOR BUILDING FOUNDATIONS
over to third parties either in original or copy.
Ownership and copyright is reserved by Keller Ground Engineering India Pvt Ltd. Approved : Prasad REV. DATE DESCRIPTION TECHNOLOGY PATNA , BIHTA DEPARTMENT, PATNA COMPANY, HYDERABAD DRAWING DESCRIPTION:
LAYOUT OF VIBRO COMPACTION WORKS AT ESS BUILDING
Assessment Report on Post ECPTs at ESS

Annexure II: Field Records of Pre and Post ECPTs

 Cone resistance (qc) in MPa Sleeve f riction (f s) in MPa Friction ratio (Rf ) in %

0 4 8 12 16 20 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0 2 4 6 8 10

+60

+59

+58

+57
<- Depth in m to reference level

+56

+55

+54

+53

+52

+51 W.L. = -8.67 m

+50

+49

+48

24.75 ->
+47 24.99 ->

+46

+45

+44

+43

+42

+41

+40

+39

+38

+37

u2
Test according NEN 5140 class 1 Predrill: 0.00 m Pre drille d
150 cm²
10 cm² G.L.: 59.80 m W.L.: -8.67 m Date: 31-08-2018

Project: ECPT Works for Vibro Compaction Cone no.: S10CFIIP.S16336

Location: ESS (Old Proposed), IIT Patna, Bihta Project no.: 930
1.47

Position: 2825872.795, 283870.471 CPT no.: Pre ECPT 26 1/2

 Dynamic pore pressure (u2) in MPa Soil Classification (avg. of Fr and Bq)

-0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

+60
(0) Not defined
(6)
+59 (1) Sensitive, fine grained
(6)
(2) Organic soils-peats
+58 (6) (3) Clays-clay to silty clay
(4) Clayey silt to silty clay
+57 (5) Sand mixtures
<- Depth in m to reference level

(6) Sands
+56 (7) Gravelly sand to sand
(8) Very stiff sand to clayey sand
+55 (9) Very stiff fine grained

+54 (6)

+53

+52

(6)
+51 W.L. = -8.67 m

+50 (6)

+49

+48

+47

(0)

+46

(0)
+45
(0)

+44
(0)
(0)
+43

+42

+41

+40

+39

+38

+37

u2
Test according NEN 5140 class 1 Predrill: 0.00 m Pre drille d
150 cm²
10 cm² G.L.: 59.80 m W.L.: -8.67 m Date: 31-08-2018

Project: ECPT Works for Vibro Compaction Cone no.: S10CFIIP.S16336

Location: ESS (Old Proposed), IIT Patna, Bihta Project no.: 930
1.47

Position: 2825872.795, 283870.471 CPT no.: Pre ECPT 26 2/2

 Cone resistance (qc) in MPa Sleeve f riction (f s) in MPa Friction ratio (Rf ) in %

0 4 8 12 16 20 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0 2 4 6 8 10

+60

+59

+58

+57
<- Depth in m to reference level

+56 24.52 ->

+55

+54

+53

+52

+51

+50

+49

+48

+47

+46

+45

+44

+43

+42

+41

+40

+39

+38

+37

u2
Test according NEN 5140 class 1 Predrill: 0.00 m Pre drille d
150 cm²
10 cm² G.L.: 59.43 m Date: 13-01-2019

Project: ECPT Works for Vibro Compaction Cone no.: S10CFIIP.S18467

Location: ESS, IIT Patna, Bihta Project no.: 930
1.47

Position: 2825890.092, 283819.776 CPT no.: Pos t ECPT 26 1/2

 Dynamic pore pressure (u2) in MPa Soil Classification (avg. of Fr and Bq)

-0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

+60
(0) Not defined
(7)
+59 (1) Sensitive, fine grained
(6)
(2) Organic soils-peats
(4)
+58 (3) Clays-clay to silty clay
(4) Clayey silt to silty clay
(6)
+57 (5) Sand mixtures
<- Depth in m to reference level

(6) Sands
(7)
+56 (7) Gravelly sand to sand
(8) Very stiff sand to clayey sand
+55 (9) Very stiff fine grained

+54

+53

+52

+51

+50

+49

+48

+47

+46

+45

+44

+43

+42

+41

+40

+39

+38

+37

u2
Test according NEN 5140 class 1 Predrill: 0.00 m Pre drille d
150 cm²
10 cm² G.L.: 59.43 m Date: 13-01-2019

Project: ECPT Works for Vibro Compaction Cone no.: S10CFIIP.S18467

Location: ESS, IIT Patna, Bihta Project no.: 930
1.47

Position: 2825890.092, 283819.776 CPT no.: Pos t ECPT 26 2/2

 Cone resistance (qc) in MPa Sleeve f riction (f s) in MPa Friction ratio (Rf ) in %

0 4 8 12 16 20 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0 2 4 6 8 10

+60

+59

+58

+57
<- Depth in m to reference level

+56

+55

+54 25.33 ->

23.79 ->

+53

+52

+51

+50

+49

+48

+47

+46

+45

+44

+43

+42

+41

+40

+39

+38

+37

u2
Test according NEN 5140 class 1 Predrill: 0.00 m Pre drille d
150 cm²
10 cm² G.L.: 59.37 m Date: 13-01-2019

Project: ECPT Works for Vibro Compaction Cone no.: S10CFIIP.S18468

Location: ESS, IIT Patna, Bihta Project no.: 930
1.47

Position: 2825873.101, 283835.634 CPT no.: Post ECPT 26A 1/2

 Dynamic pore pressure (u2) in MPa Soil Classification (avg. of Fr and Bq)

-0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

+60
(0) Not defined
+59 (6) (1) Sensitive, fine grained
(8)
(2) Organic soils-peats
+58 (6) (3) Clays-clay to silty clay
(4) Clayey silt to silty clay
+57 (5) Sand mixtures
<- Depth in m to reference level

(6) Sands
+56 (7) Gravelly sand to sand
(8) Very stiff sand to clayey sand
+55 (9) Very stiff fine grained

+54

+53

+52

+51

+50

+49

+48

+47

+46

+45

+44

+43

+42

+41

+40

+39

+38

+37

u2
Test according NEN 5140 class 1 Predrill: 0.00 m Pre drille d
150 cm²
10 cm² G.L.: 59.37 m Date: 13-01-2019

Project: ECPT Works for Vibro Compaction Cone no.: S10CFIIP.S18468

Location: ESS, IIT Patna, Bihta Project no.: 930
1.47

Position: 2825873.101, 283835.634 CPT no.: Post ECPT 26A 2/2

Assessment Report on Post ECPTs at ESS

Annexure III: Liquefaction Analysis of Post ECPTs

Project : VC Works for IIT Patna
Client : NCC Limited

Reference: 1. Liquefaction Resistance of Soils, Youd et. Al., Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, Oct 2001

Peak Ground Acceleration 0.24 g Zone IV

Earthquake Magnitude (MW ) 6.50
Magnitude Scaling Factor (MSF) 1.44 for MW other than 7.5, MSF = 102.34 / MW 2.56, Revised Idriss Scaling Factor
FOS = CRR7.5/ CSR x MSF

Ground Water Level 0.0 m GWL at Investigation time 9.00 m

Existing Ground level 0.00
Analysis Borehole Post ECPT 26 - ESS
Surcharge 1.0 m
RL 59.430 m
Liquefaction analysis of Insitu ground
Depth ϒ´ ϒ´ σ´ σ´ Post
RL (m) ϒ [kN/m³] σ [kN/m²] σ [kN/m²] rd
[m] [kN/m³] [kN/m³] [kN/m²] [kN/m²] CSR qfield CQ (qc1N) Ic Kc (qc1N)cs CRR7.5 FoS Liquefaction Potential
kPa
18.0 18.0
1.5 57.930 15.5 5.5 15.5 41.3 26.3 23.3 23.3 0.99 0.242 1310 1.70 22 2.60 3 74 -- -- Not susceptible to liquefaction as fines are more
3.0 56.430 17.0 7.0 17.0 66.8 36.8 48.8 48.8 0.98 0.277 11870 1.70 202 1.40 1 202 0.844 4.40 No
3.5 55.930 18.5 8.5 18.5 76.0 41.0 58.0 58.0 0.97 0.281 22360 1.50 336 1.30 1 336 3.621 18.55 No

Relevant Equations in the reference 1. mentioned above:

1. For rd, refer equation (2a) and (2b).
2. For CSR, refer equation (1).
3. For (N1)60cs, refer equation (5) and (8).
4. For CRR, refer equation (4).

Relevant Equations in the reference 2. mentioned above:

1. For α, refer Section 9.
Project : VC Works for IIT Patna
Client : NCC Limited

Reference: 1. Liquefaction Resistance of Soils, Youd et. Al., Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, Oct 2001

Peak Ground Acceleration 0.24 g Zone IV

Earthquake Magnitude (MW ) 6.50
Magnitude Scaling Factor (MSF) 1.44 for MW other than 7.5, MSF = 102.34 / MW 2.56, Revised Idriss Scaling Factor
FOS = CRR7.5/ CSR x MSF

Ground Water Level 0.0 m GWL at Investigation time 9.00 m

Existing Ground level 0.00
Analysis Borehole Post ECPT 26A - ESS
Surcharge 1.0 m
RL 59.370 m
Liquefaction analysis of Insitu ground
Depth ϒ´ ϒ´ σ´ σ´ Post
RL (m) ϒ [kN/m³] σ [kN/m²] σ [kN/m²] rd
[m] [kN/m³] [kN/m³] [kN/m²] [kN/m²] CSR qfield CQ (qc1N) Ic Kc (qc1N)cs CRR7.5 FoS Liquefaction Potential
kPa
18.0 18.0
1.5 57.870 15.5 5.5 15.5 41.3 26.3 23.3 23.3 0.99 0.242 4830 1.70 82 2.60 3 273 -- -- Not susceptible to liquefaction as fines are more
3.0 56.370 16.5 6.5 16.5 66.0 36.0 48.0 48.0 0.98 0.279 7750 1.70 132 1.60 1 132 0.293 1.51 No
4.5 54.870 17.5 7.5 17.5 92.3 47.3 74.3 74.3 0.97 0.294 14920 1.25 187 1.49 1 187 0.684 3.35 No
5.8 53.570 18.5 8.5 18.5 116.3 58.3 98.3 98.3 0.96 0.297 21980 1.01 223 1.48 1 223 1.106 5.36 No

Relevant Equations in the reference 1. mentioned above:

1. For rd, refer equation (2a) and (2b).
2. For CSR, refer equation (1).
3. For (N1)60cs, refer equation (5) and (8).
4. For CRR, refer equation (4).

Relevant Equations in the reference 2. mentioned above:

1. For α, refer Section 9.
Assessment Report on Post ECPTs at ESS

Annexure IV: Bearing Capacity Calculations

Design : Safe Bearing Capacity of VC Soil
Project : VC Works for Academic and Residential Buildings
Location : ESS
Structure : ESS

Insitu Soil Details : Treated parameters

Type of soil = Silty Sand
Undrained Cohesion, Cu soil = 0.00 kPa
Angle of internal friction, soil = 32.0 deg
Bulk density, gsoil = 18.0 kN/m3
Depth of GWT below EGL, Dw = 0 m
Submerged density, g'soil = 8.0 kN/m3
Average SPT N value = 26

Foundation Details
Depth of foundation considered = 2.0 m RL +57.800m
Type of foundation = Rigid Foundation
Footing type (R/C/S/CS) = S
Length of the footing = 1.5 m
Width/Diameter of the footing = 1.5 m

Safe Bearing Capacity of Foundation Soil (Shear Failure Criteria):

Nɸ = 3.25
Shear Failure Condition = Intermediate Shear Failure
Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Factors (Local) Clause 3, IS:6403:2002
Angle of internal friction for local shear failure = 22.62
Nc' Nq' Nγ' Clause 3.6.1, Table 1,
17.91 8.63 8.26 IS:6403:2002

Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Factors (General)

Angle of internal friction for General shear failure = 32.00
Nc Nq Nγ
36.53 24.36 32.65

Shape Factors Clause 5.1.2.1, Table 2,

sc sq sγ IS:6403:2002
1.30 1.20 0.80
Clause 5.1.2.4, IS:6403:2002
W' 0.5

Depth Factors
dc dq dγ Clause 5.1.2.2, IS:6403:2002
1.48 1.24 1.24

Net Ultimate Bearing Capacity for Local Shear Failure

qd = 2/3cNc'scdcic + q(Nq'-1)sqdqiq + 0.5BγNγ'sγdγiγW' Clause 5.1.2, IS 6403:2002
NBC = 237 kPa
Factor of Safety = 2.5
SBC = 95 kPa SPT Naverage corrected 10

Net Ultimate Bearing Capacity for General Shear Failure

qd = cNcscdcic + q(Nq-1)sqdqiq + 0.5BγNγsγdγiγW'
NBC = 775 kPa
Factor of Safety = 2.5
SBC = 310 kPa SPT Naverage corrected 30
2
Intermediate Shear Failure SBC = 26.7 t/m SPT N 26
Design : Safe Bearing Capacity of VC Soil
Project : VC Works for Academic and Residential Buildings
Location : ESS
Structure : ESS

Insitu Soil Details : Treated parameters

Type of soil = Silty Sand
Undrained Cohesion, Cu soil = 0.00 kPa
Angle of internal friction, soil = 32.0 deg
Bulk density, gsoil = 18.0 kN/m3
Depth of GWT below EGL, Dw = 0 m
Submerged density, g'soil = 8.0 kN/m3
Average SPT N value = 28

Foundation Details
Depth of foundation considered = 2.0 m RL +57.800m
Type of foundation = Rigid Foundation
Footing type (R/C/S/CS) = S
Length of the footing = 2 m
Width/Diameter of the footing = 2 m

Safe Bearing Capacity of Foundation Soil (Shear Failure Criteria):

Nɸ = 3.25
Shear Failure Condition = Intermediate Shear Failure
Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Factors (Local) Clause 3, IS:6403:2002
Angle of internal friction for local shear failure = 22.62
Nc' Nq' Nγ' Clause 3.6.1, Table 1,
17.91 8.63 8.26 IS:6403:2002

Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Factors (General)

Angle of internal friction for General shear failure = 32.00
Nc Nq Nγ
36.53 24.36 32.65

Shape Factors Clause 5.1.2.1, Table 2,

sc sq sγ IS:6403:2002
1.30 1.20 0.80
Clause 5.1.2.4, IS:6403:2002
W' 0.5

Depth Factors
dc dq dγ Clause 5.1.2.2, IS:6403:2002
1.36 1.18 1.18

Net Ultimate Bearing Capacity for Local Shear Failure

qd = 2/3cNc'scdcic + q(Nq'-1)sqdqiq + 0.5BγNγ'sγdγiγW' Clause 5.1.2, IS 6403:2002
NBC = 243 kPa
Factor of Safety = 2.5
SBC = 97 kPa SPT Naverage corrected 10

Net Ultimate Bearing Capacity for General Shear Failure

qd = cNcscdcic + q(Nq-1)sqdqiq + 0.5BγNγsγdγiγW'
NBC = 807 kPa
Factor of Safety = 2.5
SBC = 323 kPa SPT Naverage corrected 30
2
Intermediate Shear Failure SBC = 30.0 t/m SPT N 28
Design : Safe Bearing Capacity of VC Soil
Project : VC Works for Academic and Residential Buildings
Location : ESS
Structure : ESS

Insitu Soil Details : Treated parameters

Type of soil = Silty Sand
Undrained Cohesion, Cu soil = 0.00 kPa
Angle of internal friction, soil = 32.0 deg
Bulk density, gsoil = 18.0 kN/m3
Depth of GWT below EGL, Dw = 0 m
Submerged density, g'soil = 8.0 kN/m3
Average SPT N value = 32

Foundation Details
Depth of foundation considered = 2.0 m RL +57.800m
Type of foundation = Rigid Foundation
Footing type (R/C/S/CS) = S
Length of the footing = 2.5 m
Width/Diameter of the footing = 2.5 m

Safe Bearing Capacity of Foundation Soil (Shear Failure Criteria):

Nɸ = 3.25
Shear Failure Condition = General Shear Failure
Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Factors (Local) Clause 3, IS:6403:2002
Angle of internal friction for local shear failure = 22.62
Nc' Nq' Nγ' Clause 3.6.1, Table 1,
17.91 8.63 8.26 IS:6403:2002

Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Factors (General)

Angle of internal friction for General shear failure = 32.00
Nc Nq Nγ
36.53 24.36 32.65

Shape Factors Clause 5.1.2.1, Table 2,

sc sq sγ IS:6403:2002
1.30 1.20 0.80
Clause 5.1.2.4, IS:6403:2002
W' 0.5

Depth Factors
dc dq dγ Clause 5.1.2.2, IS:6403:2002
1.29 1.14 1.14

Net Ultimate Bearing Capacity for Local Shear Failure

qd = 2/3cNc'scdcic + q(Nq'-1)sqdqiq + 0.5BγNγ'sγdγiγW' Clause 5.1.2, IS 6403:2002
NBC = 0 kPa
Factor of Safety = 2.5
SBC = 0 kPa SPT Naverage corrected 10

Net Ultimate Bearing Capacity for General Shear Failure

qd = cNcscdcic + q(Nq-1)sqdqiq + 0.5BγNγsγdγiγW'
NBC = 850 kPa
Factor of Safety = 2.5
SBC = 340 kPa SPT Naverage corrected 30
2
General Shear Failure SBC = 34.0 t/m SPT N 32
Design : Safe Bearing Capacity of VC Soil
Project : VC Works for Academic and Residential Buildings
Location : ESS
Structure : ESS

Insitu Soil Details : Treated parameters

Type of soil = Silty Sand
Undrained Cohesion, Cu soil = 0.00 kPa
Angle of internal friction, soil = 32.0 deg
Bulk density, gsoil = 18.0 kN/m3
Depth of GWT below EGL, Dw = 0 m
Submerged density, g'soil = 8.0 kN/m3
Average SPT N value = 35

Foundation Details
Depth of foundation considered = 2.0 m RL +57.800m
Type of foundation = Rigid Foundation
Footing type (R/C/S/CS) = S
Length of the footing = 3 m
Width/Diameter of the footing = 3 m

Safe Bearing Capacity of Foundation Soil (Shear Failure Criteria):

Nɸ = 3.25
Shear Failure Condition = General Shear Failure
Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Factors (Local) Clause 3, IS:6403:2002
Angle of internal friction for local shear failure = 22.62
Nc' Nq' Nγ' Clause 3.6.1, Table 1,
17.91 8.63 8.26 IS:6403:2002

Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Factors (General)

Angle of internal friction for General shear failure = 32.00
Nc Nq Nγ
36.53 24.36 32.65

Shape Factors Clause 5.1.2.1, Table 2,

sc sq sγ IS:6403:2002
1.30 1.20 0.80
Clause 5.1.2.4, IS:6403:2002
W' 0.5

Depth Factors
dc dq dγ Clause 5.1.2.2, IS:6403:2002
1.24 1.12 1.12

Net Ultimate Bearing Capacity for Local Shear Failure

qd = 2/3cNc'scdcic + q(Nq'-1)sqdqiq + 0.5BγNγ'sγdγiγW' Clause 5.1.2, IS 6403:2002
NBC = 0 kPa
Factor of Safety = 2.5
SBC = 0 kPa SPT Naverage corrected 10

Net Ultimate Bearing Capacity for General Shear Failure

qd = cNcscdcic + q(Nq-1)sqdqiq + 0.5BγNγsγdγiγW'
NBC = 898 kPa
Factor of Safety = 2.5
SBC = 359 kPa SPT Naverage corrected 30
2
General Shear Failure SBC = 35.9 t/m SPT N 35
Assessment Report on Post ECPTs at ESS

Annexure V: Settlement Calculations

Design : Settlement of VC Soil
Project : VC Works for Academic and Residential Buildings
Location : ESS
Structure : ESS Post ECPT 26A

Insitu Soil Details : Treated parameters

Type of soil = Silty Sand
Bulk density, gsoil = 18.0 kN/m3
Depth of GWT below EGL, Dw = 0 m
Submerged density, g'soil = 8.0 kN/m3

Foundation Details
Depth of foundation considered (Z) = 2.0 m RL + 57.800
Type of foundation = Rigid Foundation
Footing type (R/C/S/CS) = S
Length of the footing (2L) = 1.5 m
Width of the footing (2B) = 1.5 m
L = 0.75 m
B = 0.75 m
2
SBC (p) = 267 kN/m

Calculation of settlement for each layer

Settlement, S = (σz / Es) x H
where, σz = Pressure increase at the middle of the layer
Es = Soil Modulus
H = Thickness of Layer

σz = 4 x p x IB Equation B3, IS 8009: Part 1

where p = Safe Bearing Capacity
IB = Influence factor as a function of L/Z0 and B/Z0 Figure 18, IS 8009: Part 1: 1976

Layer RL Z0 H ES σz S
SPT N L/Z0 B/Z0 IB
From To To m m kN/m2 kN/m2 mm
2.00 3.00 56.8 0.5 1.00 16 0.01 0.013 0.21 24000 224 9.35
Silty
3.00 4.00 55.8 1.5 1.00 26 0.01 0.013 0.08 39000 85.4 2.19 Sand
4.00 4.25 55.6 2.13 0.25 35 0.01 0.014 0.05 52500 53.4 0.25

Calculation of correction factors

Rigidity factor = 0.8 Clause 9.5.2, IS 8009 Part 1: 1976
Depth factor calculations
Depth (D) = 2.0 m
Length (L) = 1.5 m
Width (B) = 1.5 m
D/(L*B)^0.5 = 1.33
L/B = 1
Depth Factor = 0.725

Total Settlement = 11.8 x 0.8 x 0.725

Total Settlement = 6.84 mm
Design : Settlement of VC Soil
Project : VC Works for Academic and Residential Buildings
Location : ESS
Structure : ESS Post ECPT 26A

Insitu Soil Details : Treated parameters

Type of soil = Silty Sand
Bulk density, gsoil = 18.0 kN/m3
Depth of GWT below EGL, Dw = 0 m
Submerged density, g'soil = 8.0 kN/m3

Foundation Details
Depth of foundation considered (Z) = 2.0 m RL + 57.800
Type of foundation = Rigid Foundation
Footing type (R/C/S/CS) = S
Length of the footing (2L) = 2 m
Width of the footing (2B) = 2 m
L = 1 m
B = 1 m
2
SBC (p) = 300 kN/m

Calculation of settlement for each layer

Settlement, S = (σz / Es) x H
where, σz = Pressure increase at the middle of the layer
Es = Soil Modulus
H = Thickness of Layer

σz = 4 x p x IB Equation B3, IS 8009: Part 1

where p = Safe Bearing Capacity
IB = Influence factor as a function of L/Z0 and B/Z0 Figure 18, IS 8009: Part 1: 1976

Layer RL Z0 H ES σz S
SPT N L/Z0 B/Z0 IB
From To To m m kN/m2 kN/m2 mm
2.00 3.00 56.8 0.5 1.00 16 0.02 0.018 0.23 24000 276 11.5
Silty
3.00 4.00 55.8 1.5 1.00 26 0.02 0.018 0.12 39000 144 3.69 Sand
4.00 5.00 54.8 2.5 1.00 36 0.02 0.018 0.06 54000 72 1.33

Calculation of correction factors

Rigidity factor = 0.8 Clause 9.5.2, IS 8009 Part 1: 1976
Depth factor calculations
Depth (D) = 2.0 m
Length (L) = 2.0 m
Width (B) = 2.0 m
D/(L*B)^0.5 = 1
L/B = 1
Depth Factor = 0.725

Total Settlement = 16.53 x 0.8 x 0.725

Total Settlement = 9.58 mm
Design : Settlement of VC Soil
Project : VC Works for Academic and Residential Buildings
Location : ESS
Structure : ESS Post ECPT 26A

Insitu Soil Details : Treated parameters

Type of soil = Silty Sand
Bulk density, gsoil = 18.0 kN/m3
Depth of GWT below EGL, Dw = 0 m
Submerged density, g'soil = 8.0 kN/m3

Foundation Details
Depth of foundation considered (Z) = 2.0 m RL + 57.800
Type of foundation = Rigid Foundation
Footing type (R/C/S/CS) = S
Length of the footing (2L) = 2.5 m
Width of the footing (2B) = 2.5 m
L = 1.25 m
B = 1.25 m
2
SBC (p) = 340 kN/m

Calculation of settlement for each layer

Settlement, S = (σz / Es) x H
where, σz = Pressure increase at the middle of the layer
Es = Soil Modulus
H = Thickness of Layer

σz = 4 x p x IB Equation B3, IS 8009: Part 1

where p = Safe Bearing Capacity
IB = Influence factor as a function of L/Z0 and B/Z0 Figure 18, IS 8009: Part 1: 1976

Layer RL Z0 H ES σz S
SPT N L/Z0 B/Z0 IB
From To To m m kN/m2 kN/m2 mm
2.00 3.00 56.8 0.5 1.00 16 0.02 0.022 0.23 24000 313 13
3.00 4.00 55.8 1.5 1.00 26 0.02 0.022 0.14 39000 190 4.88 Silty
4.00 5.00 54.8 2.5 1.00 36 0.02 0.023 0.08 54000 109 2.01 Sand
5.00 5.75 54.1 3.38 0.75 49 0.02 0.023 0.05 73500 68 0.69

Calculation of correction factors

Rigidity factor = 0.8 Clause 9.5.2, IS 8009 Part 1: 1976
Depth factor calculations
Depth (D) = 2.0 m
Length (L) = 2.5 m
Width (B) = 2.5 m
D/(L*B)^0.5 = 0.8
L/B = 1
Depth Factor = 0.770

Total Settlement = 20.63 x 0.8 x 0.77

Total Settlement = 12.7 mm
Design : Settlement of VC Soil
Project : VC Works for Academic and Residential Buildings
Location : ESS
Structure : ESS Post ECPT 26A

Insitu Soil Details : Treated parameters

Type of soil = Silty Sand
Bulk density, gsoil = 18.0 kN/m3
Depth of GWT below EGL, Dw = 0 m
Submerged density, g'soil = 8.0 kN/m3

Foundation Details
Depth of foundation considered (Z) = 2.0 m RL + 57.800
Type of foundation = Rigid Foundation
Footing type (R/C/S/CS) = S
Length of the footing (2L) = 3 m
Width of the footing (2B) = 3 m
L = 1.5 m
B = 1.5 m
2
SBC (p) = 359 kN/m

Calculation of settlement for each layer

Settlement, S = (σz / Es) x H
where, σz = Pressure increase at the middle of the layer
Es = Soil Modulus
H = Thickness of Layer

σz = 4 x p x IB Equation B3, IS 8009: Part 1

where p = Safe Bearing Capacity
IB = Influence factor as a function of L/Z0 and B/Z0 Figure 18, IS 8009: Part 1: 1976

Layer RL Z0 H SPT N L/Z0 B/Z0 IB ES σz S

From To To m m kN/m2 kN/m2 mm
2.00 3.00 56.8 0.5 1.00 16 0.03 0.026 0.24 24000 345 14.4
3.00 4.00 55.8 1.5 1.00 26 0.03 0.027 0.17 39000 244 6.26
Silty
4.00 5.00 54.8 2.5 1.00 36 0.03 0.027 0.105 54000 151 2.79 Sand
5.00 6.00 53.8 3.5 1.00 49 0.03 0.028 0.06 73500 86 1.17
6.00 6.50 53.3 4.25 0.50 48 0.03 0.028 0.045 72000 65 0.45

Calculation of correction factors

Rigidity factor = 0.8 Clause 9.5.2, IS 8009 Part 1: 1976
Depth factor calculations
Depth (D) = 2.0 m
Length (L) = 3.0 m
Width (B) = 3.0 m
D/(L*B)^0.5 = 0.67
L/B = 1
Depth Factor = 0.800

Total Settlement = 25.04 x 0.8 x 0.8

Total Settlement = 16 mm