Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Problem: An implemented 0-5 Nausea (N) and 0-5 Vomiting (V) Scale using descriptors in
2008 required psychometric testing. The N/V scales have been applied for over a year, electronic
reports demonstrate active use of the scales in patient assessment of N/V symptoms.
Evidence: Satisfaction with tools and content validity as reported by application are not enough
to measure the soundness. Measurement tool attributes require study to demonstrate their construct
validity and reliability.
Strategy: This methodological study aims to establish psychometric properties of the new nausea
and vomiting scales with descriptors (NVWD), measuring their inter-rater reliability, validity,
practicality, & sensitivity.
Results: Content validity has been established in two previous studies. In a Post Operative N/V
study 172 patients rated their N/V using the 0-5 N/V scales with descriptors. Sixty of sixty five
(60/65) or 92% of nurses applying the N/V scales rated them satisfactory. In evaluation of nausea
scale study results: nurses preferred significantly more the 0-5 point scale over the 0-10 point scale;
results in four areas: (a) nurses understanding (t = 3.61, p = .001), (b) nurse’s communication with
the patient ( t=4.23, p=0003), (c) ability for patients to communicate (t=5.4, p=0001) and (d)
communication with the physician ( t= 5.7, p =0001).
Recommendations: The tools are found effective by nurses & patients in two studies. Use of
the scale is practical & useful in communication of intensity of N/V symptoms. Psychometrics
are necessary for wider application.
Lessons Learned: Scales are adapted when found to be useful by physicians, nurses and patients.
Psychometrics allows for further use in national and international hospitals.
Bibliography
1. Apfel, C.C., Laara, E., Koivuranta, M., Greim, C-A. & Rower, N. (1999). A simplified risk
score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesthesiology, 91, 693-700.
2. Boogaerts, J.G., Vanacker, S.L., Albert, A., Bardiau, F.M. (2000). Assessment of
postoperative nausea using a visual analogue scale. ACTA.Printed in Denmark. 44:470-474.
3. Borjeson, S., Hursti, T., Peterson, C., Fredikson,M., Furst, C.J., Avall-Lundqvist, E, et al. (1997).
Similarities and differences in assessing nausea on a verbal category scale and a visual analogue
scale. Cancer Nursing. Lipppincott-Raven.
4. Dibble, S.L., Casey, K., Nussey, B., Israel, J., Luce, J. (2004). Chemotherapy-Induced
Vomiting in Women Treated for Breast Cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum. 31: (1) pp.E1-E8.
5. DeVon, H.A., Block, M.E., Moyle-right, P. Ernst, S.J., Hayden, S. J. Lazzara, D.J., Savoy, S.M.,
Kostas-Polston, E. (2007). A Psychometric Toolbox for Testing Validity and Reliability. Journal of
Nursing Scholoarship. 39:(2) pp.15-164.
7. Herrstedt, J. (1998). Antiemetic research: a look to the future. Support Care Cancer 6:8-12.
8. Howland, R.D., & Mycek, M.J. (Eds). (2006). Lippincott’s illustrated reviews:
Pharmacology (3rd edition). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
9. Kirkova, J., Mellar, P.D., Walsh, D, Tiernan, E., O’Leary, N., LeGrand, S.B, Lagman,
R. L. Russell, K.M. (2006), Cancer symptom assessment instruments: A systematic review.
American Society of Clinical Oncology. 24 :( 9), 1459-2973.
11. Mertens, W.C., Higby, D.B., Parisi, R., Fitzgerald, J., Benjamin, E.M., Lindenauer, P.
K. (2003). Improving the Care of Patients with regard to Chemotherapy-Induced nausea and Emesis:
The Effect of Feedback to Clinicians on Adherence to Antiemetic Prescribing Guideline. Journal of
Clinical Oncology. 21: (7): pp. 1373-1378.
12. Morrow, G. (1984). The Assessment of Nausea & Vomiting, Past Problems, Current Issues and
Suggestions for Future Research. Cancer. 51:10. 2267-2280.
13. Morrow, G. (1992). A Patient report measure for quantification of chemotherapy induced
nausea and emesis: psychometric properties of the Morrow assessment of nausea and emesis
(MANE). Britich Jouranl Cancer. 66. Suppl. XIX. S72-S74.
14. Muth, E.R., Stern R.M., Thayer, J.F., Koch, K.L. (1996). Assessment of the Multiple
Dimensions of Nausea: The Nausea Profile (NP). Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 40: (5)
pp. 511-520.
18. Oncology Nursing Society Guidelines (2007). Putting Evidence into Practice (PEP)
Cards. http://www.ons.org/outcomes/volume1/
20. Rhodes, V.A., McDaniel, R.W. (2001). Nausea, Vomiting, and Retching: Complex Problems
in Palliative Care. CA. A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 51(4) 232-320.
21. Roscoe.J., Morrow, G.R., Hickok, J.T. & Stern, R.M. Nausea and Vomiting Remain Significant
Clinical Problem: Trends Over Time in Congrolling Chemotherapy-Induces Nausea and Vomiting
in 1413 patients Treated in Community Clinical Practices. Journal of Pain and Symptom
Management. (2): (2) 113-121.
22. Stromborg. F., Olsen, M. & Olsen, S.J. (2009). “Instruments for Clinical Health Care Research”
p.587. (5th ed). Massachusetts: Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
23. Tipton, J. McDaniel, R.W. Barbour, L, Johnston., MP., Kayne, M. LeRoy, P. & Ripple, M.
Putting Evidence Into Practice: Evidence Based Interventions to Prevent, Manage, and Treat
Chemotherapy-Induces Nausea and Vomiting. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing. 11: (1) 69-76.