Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 52

GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

HOLY SPIRIT UNIVERSITY OF KASLIK


GCV 310 – Reinforced Concrete 1
<faculty of engineering>

Names (Full Name) & Group (if exist): GROUP A

Abou Harb Chantal

Fayad Hanady

Khalil Maria

Richa Manuella

Date: Monday, December 3, 2018

Document # Name: Reinforced concrete 1 Report

Academic Year: Fall 2018-2019

Comments
…………………………………………………………………………………

…………………………………………………………………………………

…………………………………………………………………………………

NB: All documents (Project, HW, Research) have to cover this page, otherwise it will not be marked)
Cover Page GCV-310- Rev A

0|Page
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

Table of contents

INTRODUCTION:
 Introduction…………………………………………3
 Building elevations …………………………...........4
 Building sections …………………………………..6
GENERAL STUDY: …………..……………………...7
 Slab thickness ………………………………...........8
Load calculations:
 Dead Load …………………………………………9
 Live Load ………………………………………….11
 Super Imposed Dead Load …………………..........12
 Wind Load ………………………………………...12
LOAD ON COLUMNS AND RUNDOWN:
 Service load rundown……………………………..15
 Ultimate load rundown…………………………….19
LOAD ON BEAMS
 Shear diagram …………………………………....24
 Moment diagram…………………………….........26
LOAD ON RIBS
 Shear diagram……………………..……………...28
 Moment diagram………………………………….30
1|Page
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

BEAMS DESIGN
 Positive moment……………………………….32
 Negative moment……………………………....33
 Shear……………………………………………34
RIBS DESIGN
 Positive moment………………………………..36
 Negative moment………………………….……37
 Shear…………………………………………....38
COLUMNS DESIGN …………………………….40
FOUNDATION
 Wall Footings Design …………………………...44
 Columns Footings Design………………………..46
 Foundation …………………………………….....50
REFERENCES …………………………………......51

2|Page
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

INTRODUCTION

This project will study the structural system of a residential building in Feghal.
This building includes a basement, ground floor, first floor, and a roof (pale), having
areas as follows: basement 212m2, ground floor 210m2, first floor 242m2, roof
137m2.
The parking is located at the basement and the rest of the floors are residential.
The floors are connected by stairs to each other.
This project will deal with the calculations of the loads in each floor from
vertical loads as: dead load, super imposed dead load, live load to lateral loads as
wind load.
The loads on the slab are transferred by the ribs to the beams that transmit
them to the columns and walls and finally to the foundation and to the soil.
In the calculations of the dead load, live load, and super imposed dead load
we will rely to the ASCE/ESI 7-10 standards. We will also rely on the tables
provided by the ACI-318-14 in our calculation.
For the design part of the project we have chosen the first floor CSP, for which
we have designed the ribs, beams, in addition to the columns, footings of the walls
and columns.

3|Page
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

BUILDING ELEVATION

Figure 1

Figure 2

4|Page
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

Figure 3

Figure 4

5|Page
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

BUILDING SECTIONS

Figure 5

Figure 6

6|Page
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

GENERAL STUDY

The plan below shows the beams, the columns, and the direction of the ribs in
our project.

Figure 7

7|Page
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

1. Slab thickness:

Table 1

In order to determine the thickness of the slab, we divide the span of the beams
of a floor by its corresponding coefficient referring to the table shown above
provided by the ACI. This calculation will lead us to many values, so we choose the
thickness that is closer to the majority of these values. In our project the thickness is
30cm.The table below shows an example of our calculations: 𝑇ℎ𝑖𝑐𝑘𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 =

ACI Thickness
Span (m)
Coefficient (m)
Beam 1B01 5.54 18.5 0.29
Beam 1B02 5.6 18.5 0.30
Beam 1B03 6 18.5 0.32
Beam 1B03 4.2 18.5 0.22
Beam 1B04 5.5 18.5 0.29
Beam 1B05 4.89 18.5 0.26

Table 2

8|Page
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

2. Dead Load:

The dead load is the self-weight of the structural elements that are
connected to the structural system such as walls, columns, beams, slabs, etc…
The calculation of the dead load of the ribbed slab of 30cm thickness is
shown below.

(𝐿 + 𝑙)
𝑉 = ×ℎ×𝑊
2
(0.42 + 0.38)
= × 0.24 × 0.2
2
= 0.0192𝑚 Figure 8

Then to calculate the dead load 1m2 take 5 hollow blocks:

Figure 9

𝑉 = 5 × 0.0192 = 0.096𝑚
𝑉 = 1 × 0.57 × 0.3 = 0.171𝑚
𝑉 =𝑉 −𝑉 = 0.075𝑚

9|Page
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

Having densities of concrete and hollow blocks as follow:


𝜌 = 2.5 𝑇/𝑚
𝜌 = 1.1 𝑇/𝑚
𝑀 =𝜌 ×𝑉 = 2.5 × 0.075 = 0.1875 𝑇
𝑀 =𝜌 ×𝑉 = 1.1 × 0.096 = 0.1056 𝑇
𝑀 =𝑀 +𝑀 = 0.1875 + 0.1056 = 0.2931 𝑇

0.2931T in 0.57m2
× .
DLslab in 1m2: 𝐷𝐿 = = 0.5142 𝑇
.

𝐷𝐿 = 0.5142 × 9.81 = 5.04 𝐾𝑁/𝑚

The percentage of the beams in each floor should be calculated in order to find
the average dead load of each slab:

Beam area
Slab Area (m2) Percentage
(m2)

First floor slab 170.65 87.81 51.45%

Ground floor
241.87 107.88 44.6%
slab

Basement slab 231.48 92.5 40%

Table 3

10 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

We will choose the highest percentage of beams to find the average dead load of
the slab:

𝐷𝐿 = (% × 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑐𝑘𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 × 𝜌 × 𝑔) + (% ×
𝐷𝐿 ) = (0.5145 × 0.3 × 2.5 × 9.81) + (0.4855 × 5.04) = 6.23 𝐾𝑁/𝑚
DLaverage= 6.23 KN/m2

The dead load of the roof is :


𝐷𝐿 =𝜌 × 0.2 × 9.81 = 4.905𝐾𝑁/𝑚

3. Live Load:
It’s the weight of everything superimposed on, or temporarly attached to the
structure such as people, machinery and equipment, furniture, appliances, etc… but
not that of the materials used in the construction process or anything permanently
attached to it.
Refering to the ASCE standards:

Table 4

11 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

The basement, ground floor, and first floor are residential so their live load is
LL= 1.92 KN/m2
We will assume LL=2KN/m2 in the calculations
Refering to ACI code:

Table 5
The live load of the roof is LL= 0.24 KN/m2

4. Super Imposed Dead Load:


It’s the weight of non structural members that are semi-permanent, such as
plaster, tiles, masonry, leveling grout, etc… They are non-movable loads.
Assume SIDL= 6 KN/m2

5. Wind Load:
It’s the force on a structure arising from
the impact of wind on it. It’s calculated using
the formula: 𝑞 =
0.613𝐾 𝐾 𝐾 𝑉
Assume that the velocity of the wind is
V= 53.64m/s
Flat ground: Kzt=1.0
Table 6
Wind acting alone: Kd=1.0

12 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

qz=1763.75Kz
𝑃 = 𝑞 𝐺𝐶 − 𝑞 (𝐺𝐶 )
G= 0.85
GCpi = ±0.18
H= 8.5m
By interpolation: Kh=0.96
qh=1693.2 N/m2

a) Roof:

 Windward:
.
= = 0.47
.

By interpolation:
Cp=0.312
P1=753.8 N/m2 Table 7
P2=144.26 N/m2

 Leeward:
Cp=-0.6
P1=-558.7 N/m2
P2=-1168.3 N/m2
a) Walls:

13 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

b) Walls:

Table 8

 Windward: Cp=0.8

z(m) qz P1(N/m2) P2(N/m2)


0-4.6 1499.18 1324.2 714.6
6.1 1587.375 1384.19 774.635
7.6 1657.9 1432.15 822.59
H=8.27 1693.2 1456.15 846.6

Table 9

 Leeward: Cp=-0.5
P1=-414.8 N/m2
P2=-1024.38 N/m2
 Side walls: Cp=-0.7
P1=-702.678 N/m2
P2= -1312.23 N/m2

14 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

LOADS ON COLUMNS AND WALLS

In order to determine the load carried by each column in every floor we


divided the slab plans into tributary areas, we already calculated the average dead
load of our ribbed slab of thickness 30cm, and then multiplied each tributary area by
the dead load found. We repeated these steps for each floor, and in order to find the
total load on the foundation we did a rundown of the loads for all the floors to reach
the foundation. To facilitate the calculation an excel sheet was prepared.
Detailed tables for calculation are provided below.

1. Service load tables:

Table 10

15 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

Table 11

16 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

Tables 12-13

17 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

Table 14

18 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

2. Ultimate loads tables:


We multiplied the dead load and the super-imposed dead load by 1.2
and the live load by 1.6 to increase the loads applied to the structure.

Table 15

Table 16

19 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

Table 17

20 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

Table 18

21 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

Table 19

22 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

LOADS ON BEAMS

To study the loads on the beams we have chosen the first floor slab plan
We divided the tributary areas for the beams as shown below

Figure 9

23 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

Shear Diagrams: (KN)


Beam 2B01:

Figure 10

Beam 2B02:

Figure 11
24 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

Beam 2B03:

Figure 12
Beam 2B04:

25 | P a g e

Figure 13
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

Moment Diagrams: (KN.m)

Beam 2B01:

Figure 14

Beam 2B02:

Figure 15

26 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

Beam 2B03:

Figure 16

Beam 2B04:

Figure 17

27 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

Load on Ribs

1. Shear diagram(KN):
Rib 1-2-3-5:

Figure 18

Rib 7-8:

Figure 19

28 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

Rib 9-10:

Figure 20
Rib 11:

Figure 21

29 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

2.Moment diagram(KN.m):
Rib 1-2-3-5:

Figure 22

Rib 7-8:

Figure 23

30 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

Rib 9-10:

Figure 24

Rib 11:

Figure 25

31 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

Beams design

Cover = 50mm.
Yield strength capacity of bars = 420Mpa.
Concrete compressive strength: f’c = 28Mpa.
εcu =0.003
We used robot software to obtain the values of Mu.
We will take beam 2B01 as an example for the detailed calculation.

2. Positive Moment:
Mu=17 KN/m
B=800mm
D=250mm

Rn= = =0.37778
∅∗ ∗ . ∗ ∗

0.85 ∗ 𝑓′𝑐 2 ∗ 𝑅𝑛
Ƿ= ∗ 1− 1− = 0.000906
𝑓𝑦 0.85 ∗ 𝑓 𝑐

𝐴𝑠 = Ƿ ∗ b ∗ d = 180𝑚𝑚
1.4 ∗ 𝑏 ∗ 𝑑
𝐴𝑠(min) = = 666.67𝑚𝑚
𝑓𝑦
As ≤ As(min)
Steel 6 Ø12
As = 678 mm2
a=15mm.
c= = 17.6mm.

32 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

ɛs = ∗ ɛ𝑐 = 0.04 →Tension controlled section & yielding

ØMn = Ø*As*fy*(d – 0.5a) = 62.155 ≥ Mu → acceptable.

Table 20
3. Negative Moment:
Mu=143 KN/m
B=800mm
D=250mm

Rn= = =3.17778
∅∗ ∗ . ∗ ∗

0.85 ∗ 𝑓′𝑐 2 ∗ 𝑅𝑛
Ƿ= ∗ 1− 1− = 0.00815
𝑓𝑦 0.85 ∗ 𝑓 𝑐

𝐴𝑠 = Ƿ ∗ b ∗ d = 1630𝑚𝑚
1.4 ∗ 𝑏 ∗ 𝑑
𝐴𝑠(min) = = 666.67𝑚𝑚
𝑓𝑦
As ≥ As(min)
Steel 6 Ø20
As =1884mm2
a=42mm.
c= = 48.89mm.

ɛs = ∗ ɛ𝑐 =0.012 →Tension controlled section & yielding

ØMn = Ø*As*fy*(d – 0.5a) =163.24 ≥ Mu → acceptable.

33 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

4. Shear : Table 21

We will take the first span of beam 2B01 (the cantilever span) as an
example for shear design.
Vu=143KN.
𝑉𝑢 = 125.125
Span length: L=2000mm.
Ø Vc =0.75*0.17*1* 𝑓′𝑐*b*d = 134.933
Ø Vc
= 67.4667
2
Ø
𝑉𝑢 ≥ → in need for stirrups
𝑉𝑢 − Ø Vc
𝑉𝑠 = = 13.0778
Ø
0.33* 𝑓′𝑐*b*d = 349.23917 ≥ Vs

Assuming s = = 125

Av= = 15.5688

. ∗ ∗
Av(min) = = 83.333

Av(min) ≥ Av
Steel 2 Ø8
As =100.6mm2

34 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

Ø
Vu ≤ at 943.59mm → no more need for stirrups

Table 22

Figure 26

35 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

Ribs Design

Cover = 50mm.
Yield strength capacity of bars = 420Mpa.
Concrete compressive strength: f’c = 28Mpa.
εcu =0.003
We used robot software to obtain the values of Mu.
We will take Rib 1-2-3-5 as an example for the detailed calculation.

1. Positive Moment:
Mu=18 KN/m
b=420mm (Ac ≤ A(flange) )
d=250mm

Rn= = =0.7619
∅∗ ∗ . ∗ ∗

0.85 ∗ 𝑓′𝑐 2 ∗ 𝑅𝑛
Ƿ= ∗ 1− 1− = 0.00184
𝑓𝑦 0.85 ∗ 𝑓 𝑐

𝐴𝑠 = Ƿ ∗ b ∗ d = 193.2𝑚𝑚
1.4 ∗ 𝑏 ∗ 𝑑
𝐴𝑠(min) = = 125𝑚𝑚
𝑓𝑦
As ≥ As(min)
Steel 2 Ø12
As = 226 mm2

36 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

a=9.4958mm.
c= = 11.1715mm.

ɛs = ∗ ɛ𝑐 =0.06413 →Tension controlled section & yielding

ØMn = Ø*As*fy*(d – 0.5a) =20.95 ≥ Mu → acceptable.

Table 23

2. Negative Moment:
Mu=23.5 KN/m
B=150mm
D=250mm
. ∗
Rn= = =2.78159
∅∗ ∗ . ∗ ∗

0.85 ∗ 𝑓′𝑐 2 ∗ 𝑅𝑛
Ƿ= ∗ 1− 1− = 0.00705
𝑓𝑦 0.85 ∗ 𝑓 𝑐

𝐴𝑠 = Ƿ ∗ b ∗ d = 264.375𝑚𝑚
1.4 ∗ 2𝑏 ∗ 𝑑
𝐴𝑠(min) = = 250𝑚𝑚
𝑓𝑦
As ≥ As(min)
Steel 2Ø14
As =308mm2
a=36.2353mm.

37 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

c= = 42.6298mm.

ɛs = ∗ ɛ𝑐 =0.01459 →Tension controlled section & yielding

ØMn = Ø*As*fy*(d – 0.5a) =26.99 ≥ Mu → acceptable.

Table 24

3. Shear :
We will take the first span of the Rib 1-2-3-5 (the cantilever span) as an
example for shear design.
Vu=10KN.
𝑉𝑢 = 7.91667
Span length: L=1200mm.
Ø Vc =0.75*0.17*1* 𝑓′𝑐*b*d = 25.3
Ø Vc
= 12.65
2
Ø
𝑉𝑢 ≤ → no need for stirrups.

38 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

Table 25

Figure 27

39 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

COLUMNS DESIGN

Using the ultimate rundown on the columns, we will do 2 examples:


 Column C3:
Pu=1910KN
ØPn=Pu
ØPn=0.8*0.65*(0.85f’c*(Ag-Ast)+fy*Ast)
1910=0.8*0.65*(0.85*30*(800*300-Ast) + 420Ast)
Ast=6206.59𝑚𝑚 .
Steel 16 Ø25
Ast=7856𝑚𝑚 .
Using Ø12 ties (assumption)
16*𝑑 . =400mm
48*𝑑 = 576 mm
Least dimension=300mm → spacing of ties s=300mm
Ƿ= ∗ 100 = 3.27% → Acceptable (1% ≤ Ƿ ≤ 8%)

40 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

Figure 28

41 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

Figure 29

 Column C11 :
Pu=791KN
ØPn=Pu
ØPn=0.8*0.65*(0.85f’c*(Ag-Ast)+fy*Ast)
791=0.8*0.65*(0.85*30*(600*300-Ast) + 420Ast)
Ast=7780𝑚𝑚 .
Steel 16 Ø25
Ast=7856𝑚𝑚 .
Using Ø12 ties (assumption)

42 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

16*𝑑 . =400mm
48*𝑑 = 576 mm
Least dimension=300mm → spacing of ties s=300mm
Ƿ= ∗ 100 = 4.36% → Acceptable (1% ≤ Ƿ ≤ 8%)

Figure 30

43 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

Wall Footings

Assuming ∂ = 3 Kg/𝑐𝑚 .we will take wall 1 as example :


Let’s start with an assumption for h=45cm and take a cover of 9cm.
D = h – c = 36cm.
Service load = 318 KN/m.
Ultimate load = 384KN/m.

q=3 ∗ 100 − ∗ 25 = 288.75 𝐾𝑁/𝑚 .

W= = 1.1𝑚 → we will take w = 1.5m.


.

𝑞 = = 256 𝐾𝑁/𝑚 .
.

1.5 150 350


𝑉 = − − ∗ 256 = 64𝐾𝑁.
2 1000 1000
∗ ∗
d= = 96.75𝑚𝑚. ≤ 350mm → acceptable.
. ∗√ ∗
∗ .
Mu= = = 46.08
. ∗
Rn= = 0.418
. ∗ ∗

0.85 ∗ 𝑓 𝑐 2 ∗ 𝑅𝑛
Ƿ= ∗ 1− 1− = 0.001
𝑓𝑦 0.85 ∗ 𝑓 𝑐

As=0.00948*1000*350=351.2𝑚𝑚 .
As=0.0018*1000*350=630 𝑚𝑚 . ← for temperature and shrinkage.
As(min)=1167𝑚𝑚 . ←
As(min)=1141.1𝑚𝑚 .
Steel 8 Ø14 @ 12.5cm

44 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

As=1232𝑚𝑚 .
And we will use As=1130𝑚𝑚 for temperature and shrinkage.

Table 26

Figure 31

45 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

Isolated Footings

Assuming ∂ = 3 Kg/𝑐𝑚 .we will take column 10 as example :


Having: a=30cm
b=80cm
TSL=872 KN
TUL=1076 KN

Qe= =300 KN/m2

A= =2.906 m2

Let A=2m and B=2m


Qu= =269 Kn/m2
Shear one way:
Let h=45cm and d=35cm
Direction1 :
.
Vu=Qu*Area flex - -d=0.35
=269*2*0.35
=188.3 KN
ØVc=0.17*0.75*√𝑓′𝑐*b*d
=0.17*0.75*√30*350*2000
=488.842 KN
Vu ≤ ØVc : d is safe to use
Direction2:
.
Vu=Qu*A’ - -0.35=A’=0.5m2

46 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

=269*0.5
=134.5 KN
Vu ≤ ØVc : d is safe to use
Shear two way – Punching shear:

= =17.5cm
A’’=4((0.3+0.35)-(0.6+0.35))
=2.4m2
Vu=Qu*A’’
=269*2.4
=645.6 KN
B0=0.95+0.95+0.65+0.65=3.2m
ØVc=0.17*0.75*√𝑓′𝑐*b0*d
=782.147KN
Vu ≤ ØVc : d is safe to use
Design:

Mu= = =538 KN.m

Rn= =2.533
Ø

0.85 ∗ 𝑓 𝑐 2 ∗ 𝑅𝑛
Ƿ= ∗ 1− 1− = 0.00617
𝑓𝑦 0.85 ∗ 𝑓 𝑐

As= Ƿ ∗ b ∗ d
=0.00617*2000*350
=4282.25 mm2
Design:
∗ . .
Mu= = =65.905 KN.m - -d+0.35=0.7

47 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

Rn= =0.2988
Ø

0.85 ∗ 𝑓 𝑐 2 ∗ 𝑅𝑛
Ƿ= ∗ 1− 1− = 0.0007158
𝑓𝑦 0.85 ∗ 𝑓 𝑐

As= Ƿ ∗ b ∗ d
=0.0007158*2000*350
=501.102 mm2
We will use 10Ø16 @ 20cm

Table 27

48 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

Figure 32

49 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

Foundation

Figure 33

50 | P a g e
GROUP A Fall 2018-2019

REFERENCES

Structural Analysis, 8th edition, R.C Hibbeler

Design of reinforced concrete, 10th edition, Jack C. McCormac, Russel H. Brown

ACI 318-14, building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary

ASCE, minimum design loads for buildings and other structures

http://www.civilsimplified.com/resources/what-is-dead-load

http://www.civilengineeringterms.com/steel-structures/definition-of-imposed-load/

http://www.civilsimplified.com/resources/what-is-live-load

51 | P a g e

Вам также может понравиться