Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 3

2G vs 3G&4G Traffic

2G Vs 3G & 4G (Payload IN TB)


4000 46

2G
41
3500

36
3000
31

2500
26
3G + 4G
After Appying the Filtering 2G
2000 traffic is badly degraded as 21
compare to ohter technology
..User are 3G and 3G are also 16
1500
degraded but bad impact on the
2G users. They were useing 11
1000
already old base technology and
6
after the filer applied internet
500
1

0 -4

3G + 4G 2G

For Showing Traffic Pattern traffic on two axis.


2G vs 3G&4G Traffic
Traffic delta of red and blue line is visible for 2G traffic. But not with 3G
traffic.
GGMDA_2G
GGMDA_3G_Gbps
0.3
20
0.2
10
0.1
0
0 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
GGRHA_3G_Gbps
GGRHA_2G 50
0.2
0
0 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
GGSZA_2G GGSZA_3G_Gbps
0.4 50

0.2
0
0 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22

GGTZA_2G GGTZA_3G_Gbps
0.4 40

0.2 20

0 0
00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
2G vs 3G&4G Bearer
As we can see the bearer pattern of the 2G and 3G are same so its
proving that users facing problem while download in 2G.
GGMDA 2G_ Bearer Users (K)
100 GGMDA 3G_ Bearer Users (K)
300
50 200
100
0
00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 0
00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
GGRHA 2G_ Bearer Users (K) GGRHA 3G_ Bearer Users (K)
100 400

50 200

0 0
00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22

GGSZA 2G_ Bearer Users (K) GGSZA 3G_ Bearer Users (K)
100 600
400
50
200
0 0
00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
GGTZA 2G_ Bearer Users (K)
GGTZA 3G_ Bearer Users (K)
100
400

50
200

0
00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 0
00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22

Вам также может понравиться