Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1
CALIBRATION OF BOMB CALORIMETER
I. OBJECTIVES
a. To be familiar with the operation of a bomb calorimeter.
b. To determine the CV of the bomb calorimeter by burning a standard substance,
benzoic acid.
II. THEORY
The bomb calorimeter (Fig. 1), improvised in this case, consists primarily of the
sample (benzoic acid), oxygen obtained from an oxygen – filled cylinder, the stainless
steel bomb and water wherein the bomb is immersed.
Fig. 1 – Bomb Calorimeter Assembly.
The dewar, the space between the water – filled bucket and the outer jacket of the
calorimeter assembly, prevents heat transfer from the calorimeter to the rest of the
universe and vice versa, making the calorimeter more or less adiabatic. Because the
calorimeter is considered adiabatic,
q calorimeter = 0 (1)
Since the bomb is made from a rigid material (stainless steel), the combustion
reaction occurs at inherently constant volume and hence no pV work is involved during
the process. In other words,
Thus, it follows from the first law of thermodynamics that the change in internal
energy (∆U) for the calorimeter assembly is zero,
where CV is the heat capacity of the surroundings, that is, the bomb and the water
(www.chem.hope.edu, 2013).
The value of CV of the calorimeter is taken as the average of the CV of the water
and the CV of the stainless steel bomb (www.chem.hope.edu, 2013).
As stated above, benzoic acid and the platinum fuse were considered the system.
Hence, ∆Usystem is also calculated in the following manner,
∆Usystem = mburned benzoic acid ∆Ubenzoic acid + mburned platinum ∆Uplatinum (9)
Equating equations (8) and (9) we obtain the final equation used for calculating
the experimental CV of the calorimeter,
where change in the internal energy for both benzoic acid and platinum are values
evaluated or determined at the standard state (at 25 °C).
By definition of enthalpy,
∆H = ∆U + ∆(pV) (11)
∆H = ∆U + p∆V + V∆p ; ∆V = 0
∆H = ∆U + V∆p (12)
For solids and liquids, very little expansion work is done such that ∆(pV) ≈ 0 in (11).
If the amount of gases in the bomb remain constant, ∆p would be zero and thus, ∆H =
∆U. However, in most combustion reactions, the molar amounts of gases change and
therefore should be accounted for. In particular, combustion of benzoic acid will yield
gaseous CO2 based on the equation employed for hydrocarbon combustion,
pV = nRT (13)
∆(pV) = ∆(nRT) ; R and T are constants
∆H = ∆U + RT∆ngas (14)
∆Ubenzoic acid is then therefore calculated by subtracting the ∆(pV) correction from
the known enthalpy of combustion (www.csun.edu, 2013 ).
A correction factor should be included for the combustion of the fuse. The heat
released by combustion of the fuse is accounted for by recognizing that
In reality, the bomb calorimeter is not an adiabatic system. There is a small amount of
heat leaking through the dewar (qcalorimeter ≠ 0) and that the stirrer does work on the
calorimeter (wcalorimeter ≠ 0). The calorimeter’s nonadiabaticity is hence corrected with an
empirical radiative correction, RC.
T18 − T12 T6 − T0
∆T = [T12 + ((−5 min) )] − [T6 + ((1 min) )]
6min 6min
T18 − T12 T6 − T0
∆T = T12 − T6 [((−5 min) )] − [((1 min) )]
6min 6min
5(T18 − T12 ) + (T6 − T0 )
∆T = T12 − T6 − [ ]
6
∆T = T12 − T6 − RC (18)
b. Laboratory Equipment
Bomb calorimeter wire cutter/scissor
Sample pelleter digital weighing scale
Oxygen tank stop watch
Volume measuring equipment clean towel
Long stem thermometer
IV. PROCEDURE
a. PRECAUTIONS
a.1 Oxygen pressure should not exceed 590 psig (40 atm)
a.2 Sample mass should not exceed 1.5 g
a.3 Do not fire the bomb if gas bubbles are released at any point on the bomb
when it is submerged in water
a.4 Stand away from the bomb during firing and do not handle the bomb for at
least 20 seconds after firing
a.5 Report any signs of weaknesses or deterioration of the bomb immediately
h. Pre-firing
h.1 Push the two ignition wires into the terminal sockets on the bomb head
h.2 Place the oxygen-filled bomb slowly in the center of the bucket filled with
water
h.3 Check for any gas leakage by observing for continuous production of air
bubbles. If excessive leakage is detected, remove the bomb from the water,
release the pressure and fix the leak.
h.4 Close the cover and seat the cover snugly against the calorimetr
h.5 Lower the thermometer and turn on the stirrer for 6 minutes, getting
temperature readings every 30 seconds
k. Do a second trial
l. Clean and organize the laboratory for the use of the next group
V. ILLUSTRATION OF SET-UP
Fig. 5 – Weighing of the pellet. Fig. 6 – Attaching the Pt fuse on the sample.
Fig. 7 – Measurement and stabilization Fig. 8 – Filling the bomb with O2.
of water temperature.
T (°C)
Time (min:sec)
Trial 1 Trial 2
0:00 24.8 24.7
0:30 24.9 24.75
1:00 24.9 24.75
1:30 24.9 24.75
2:00 24.95 24.75
2:30 24.95 24.75
3:00 24.95 24.8
3:30 24.95 24.8
4:00 24.95 24.8
4:30 24.95 24.8
5:00 24.95 24.8
5:30 24.95 24.8
6:00 24.95 24.8
Table 3 – Temperature readings for the 12 minute – firing period.
T(°C)
Time (min:sec)
Trial 1 Trial 2
0 24.95 24.8
0:30 25.1 24.81
1:00 25.1 24.82
1:30 25.2 24.83
2:00 25.25 24.85
2:30 25.3 24.85
3:00 25.4 24.85
3:30 25.5 24.85
4:00 25.5 24.9
4:30 25.5 25.0
5:00 25.5 25.1
5:30 25.5 25.2
6:00 25.5 25.3
6:30 25.5 25.3
7:00 25.5 25.3
7:30 25.5 25.3
8:00 25.5 25.3
8:30 25.5 25.3
9:00 25.5 25.3
9:30 25.5 25.3
10:00 25.5 25.3
10:30 25.5 25.3
11:00 25.5 25.3
11:30 25.5 25.3
12:00 25.5 25.3
Note:
For Trial 1: Temperature increased from 24.95 to 25.1°C 13 seconds after firing the bomb.
For Trial 2: Temperature increased from 24.8 to 24.81°C 10 seconds after firing the bomb.
Temperature vs. Time graph (Trial 1)
25.6
25.5
Temperature (°C) 25.4
25.3
25.2
25.1 Temperature vs. Time
25 graph
24.9
24.8
24.7
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Time (min)
25.1
25
24.9 Temperature vs. Time
graph
24.8
24.7
24.6
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Time (min)
Calculations:
1. Calculating V1 and V2 for obtaining 3000 mL of water at 25.0 ± 0.3°C
Trial 1: Let X = V1 and 3000 – X = V2
V1 3000 mL
BUCKET
29.5°C 25.0°C
V2
20.0°C
m
By enthalpy balance,
But 𝜌1 = 𝜌2 = 𝜌3 and CV1 = CV2 = CV3 thus leaving us with the equation
3000 mL
V1
BUCKET 25.0°C
m
28.5°C
m
m m
m
V2
21.0°C
By enthalpy balance, m
m
ρ1 V1 CV1 ∆T1 + ρ2 V2 CV2 ∆T2 = ρ3 V3 CV3 ∆T3
But 𝜌1 = 𝜌2 = 𝜌3 and CV1 = CV2 = CV3 thus leaving us with the equation
(Note: the enthalpies of formation for both Pt (s) and O2 (g) are zero since these are the
stable forms of platinum and oxygen respectively at the standard state).
Trial 1:
mresidue = mresidue+empty capsule − mempty capsule
mresidue = 12.6747g − 12.6694g = 0.0053g
mburned benzoic acid = mpelletized benzoic acid − mresidue
mburned benzoic acid = 0.5041g − 0.0053g = 0.4988g
mburned Platinum = mPlatinum wire weighed − mPlatinum left
mburned Platinum = 0.0117g − 0.0028g = 0.0089g
∆U°system = mburned benzoic acid ∆U°C,C6H5COOH + mburned Platinum ∆U°C,Pt
J
∆U°system = (0.4988x10−3 kg) (−26434512 )
kg C6H5COOH combusted
J
+(0.0089x10−3 kg) (−673616.1156 )
kg Pt combusted
= −13191.52977 J
Trial 2:
mresidue = mresidue+empty capsule − mempty capsule
mresidue = 12.6753g − 12.6693g = 0.0060g
mburned benzoic acid = mpelletized benzoic acid − mresidue
mburned benzoic acid = 0.4907g − 0.0060g = 0.4847g
mburned Platinum = mPlatinum wire weighed − mPlatinum left
mburned Platinum = 0.0118g − 0.0029g = 0.0089g
∆U°system = mburned benzoic acid ∆U°C,C6H5COOH + mburned Platinum ∆U°C,Pt
J
∆U°system = (0.4847x10−3 kg) (−26434512 )
kg C6H5COOH combusted
J
+(0.0089x10−3 kg) (−673616.1156 )
kg Pt combusted
= −12818.80315 J
J J
(25126.72337 K + 26521.66169 K) J
CV,calorimeter = = 25824.19253
2 K
Analyses:
From the data for the firing period of benzoic acid, it takes a short period of time
(10 s and 13 s respectively for the first and second trials) for the water temperature to
rise from its pre-firing value. This is because heat is immediately released during the
combustion of benzoic acid, thereby attesting that it is indeed an exothermic reaction.
In addition, the heat of combustion released during the experiment as observed from
the calculations was largely due to the combustion of benzoic acid, with the
combustion of the platinum fuse relatively small compared to it.
Based on literature, the temperature vs. time graph for bomb calorimeter
experiments can be divided into three distinct portions; the pre-period (the time
period at which the calorimeter parts are allowed to come to equilibrium), rise period
(the time period at which the sample is burned) and the post-period (the time period at
which the calorimeter comes again to thermal equilibrium). Ideally, the graph should
resemble the illustration below (web.williams.edu, 2013):
From the experimental results, we can see that the two graphs obtained resembled
Fig. 12. Slight deviations however are observed during the pre-period since water
utilized was stabilized first to reach a final stable value before firing the sample.
Deviations in the rise period were also noticed. Such deviations may be accounted for
the incomplete combustion of the sample benzoic acid (black residue left in the
capsule). Benzoic acid has not burned completely due to insufficient oxygen supply
because of gas leakage as marked by the bubbles forming in the water when the bomb
was immersed in it. These inaccuracies are due to the fact that the calorimeter utilized
was a fabricated one and not the standard (Parr bomb calorimeter). Formation of
liquid water (condensate) was also noticed in the interior walls of the bomb
calorimeter, proving that combustion of benzoic acid really produces water in the
liquid form.
The values for ∆U°system , ∆Tcalorimeter and CV,calorimeter as shown for both trials
somewhat agree with each other. The relative differences may be due to the differing
mass of burned platinum fuse, differing mass of benzoic acid combusted for both
trials, varying degree of combustion of benzoic acid (indicated by differing amounts
of benzoic acid left after the combustion period), and of course due to the
nonadiabaticity of the calorimeter itself. These differences affected the amount of
energy released during combustion and hence affected the magnitude of
CV,calorimeter .
VII. CONCLUSIONS
http://cartwright.chem.ox.ac.uk/tlab/experiments/201.pdf
http://web.williams.edu/wp-
etc/chemistry/epeacock/EPL_CHEM_366/366_LAB_WEB/Expt_2_Bomb.pdf
http://www.chem.hope.edu/~polik/Chem345-
1997/calorimetry/bombcalorimetry1.html
http://www.csun.edu/~jeloranta/CHEM351L/experiment1.pdf
http://www.science.uwaterloo.ca/~cchieh/cact/c120/calorimetry.html
Prepared by:
Evaluated by:
ENGR. JOHN MARVIN C. MALONES
Instructor
Comments:
Rating: