Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 5

350.

org Creative Commons


The Science of 350: The Most Important
Number on the Planet
Jed Diamond, Ph.D. has been a health-care professional for the last 45 years.
He is the author of 9 books, including Looking for Love in All the Wrong Places,
Male Menopause, The Irritable Male Syndrome, and Mr. Mean: Saving Your
Relationship from the Irritable Male Syndrome . He offers counseling to men,
women, and couples in his office in California or by phone with people throughout
the U.S. and around the world. To receive a Free E-book on Men’s Health and a
free subscription to Jed’s e-newsletter go to www.MenAlive.com. If you enjoy my
articles, please subscribe. I write to everyone who joins my Scribd team.

350 Science

[UPDATE: For more, read Bill McKibben's blog post, "The Science of 350, the Most
Important Number on the Planet"]

1. 350 parts per million is what many scientists, climate experts, and progressive
national governments are now saying is the safe upper limit for CO2 in our
atmosphere.

Accelerating arctic warming and other early climate impacts have led scientists to
conclude that we are already above the safe zone at our current 392ppm, and that unless
we are able to rapidly return to below 350 ppm this century, we risk reaching tipping
points and irreversible impacts such as the melting of the Greenland ice sheet and major
methane releases from increased permafrost melt.
2. There are three numbers you need to really understand global warming, 275,
392, and 350.

For all of human history until about 200 years ago, our
atmosphere contained 275 parts per million of carbon dioxide. Parts per million is
simply a way of measuring the concentration of different gases, and means the ratio of
the number of carbon dioxide molecules to all of the molecules in the atmosphere. 275
ppm CO2 is a useful amount—without some CO2 and other greenhouse gases that trap
heat in our atmosphere, our planet would be too cold for humans to inhabit.

3. So we need some carbon in the atmosphere, but the question is how much?

Beginning in the 18th century, humans began to burn coal and gas and oil to produce
energy and goods. The amount of carbon in the atmosphere began to rise, at first slowly
and now more quickly. Many of the activities we do every day like turning the lights on,
cooking food, or heating or cooling our homes rely on energy sources like coal and oil
that emit carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases into the atmosphere. We're taking
millions of years worth of carbon, stored beneath the earth as fossil fuels, and releasing it
into the atmosphere. By now—and this is the second number—the planet has 392
parts per million CO2 – and this number is rising by about 2 parts per million every
year.

Scientists are now saying that's too much – that number is higher
than any time seen in the recorded history of our planet—and
we're already beginning to see disastrous impacts on people and
places all over the world. Glaciers everywhere are melting and
disappearing fast—and they are a source of drinking water for
hundreds of millions of people. Mosquitoes, who like a warmer
world, are spreading into lots of new places, and bringing malaria
and dengue fever with them. Drought is becoming much more
common, making food harder to grow in many places. Sea levels
have begun to rise, and scientists warn that they could go up as
much as several meters this century. If that happens, many of the world's cities, island
nations, and farmland will be underwater. The oceans are growing more acidic because of
the CO2 they are absorbing, which makes it harder for animals like corals and clams to
build and maintain their shells and skeletons. Coral reefs could start dissolving at an
atmospheric CO2 concentration of 450-500 ppm. These impacts are combining to
exacerbate conflicts and security issues in already resource-strapped regions.

The Arctic is sending us perhaps the clearest message that climate change is occurring
much more rapidly than scientists previously thought. In the summer of 2007, sea ice was
roughly 39% below the summer average for 1979-2000, a loss of area equal to nearly five
United Kingdoms.

Propelled by the news of these accelerating impacts, some of the world's leading
climate scientists have now revised the highest safe level of CO2 to 350 parts per
million. That's the last number you need to know, and the most important. It's the safety
zone for planet earth. As James Hansen of America's National Aeronautics and Space
Administration, the first scientist to warn about global warming more than two decades
ago, wrote recently:

"If humanity wishes to preserve a planet similar to that on which civilization developed
and to which life on Earth is adapted, paleoclimate evidence and ongoing climate change
suggest that CO2 will need to be reduced from its current 385 ppm to at most 350 ppm."

That will be a hard task, but not impossible. We need to stop taking carbon out of the
ground and putting it into the air. Above all, that means we need to stop burning so much
coal—and start using solar and wind energy and other such sources of renewable energy
–while ensuring the Global South a fair chance to develop. If we do, then the earth’s soils
and forests will slowly cycle some of that extra carbon out of the atmosphere, and
eventually CO2 concentrations will return to a safe level. By decreasing use of other fossil
fuels, and improving agricultural and forestry practices around the world, scientists
believe we could get back below 350 by mid-century. But the longer we remain in the
danger zone—above 350—the more likely that we will see disastrous and irreversible
climate impacts.

With your help, we can spread this important piece of information to our fellow citizens,
communities, countries, and the world. For more in-depth information on climate science,
policy, and solutions, please see our list of recommended resources below.
Sources:

• A Safe Operating Space for Humanity. Nature 461, 472-475 (24 September 2009)
| doi:10.1038/461472a; Published online 23 September 2009
• Hansen, James, et al. Target Atmospheric CO2: Where Should Humanity Aim?
Submitted April 7, 2008. NASA climate scientist James Hansen's paper about the
350ppm target.
• Hansen, James, et al. Target Atmospheric CO2: Supporting Material. Submitted
April 7, 2008.
• The IPCC 4th Assessment Report – link to the latest report by the Nobel-prize
winning United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, supported
by the world's leading climatologists.
• Baer, Paul, Tom Athanasiou and Sivan Kartha. "The Right to Develop in a
Climate Constrained World: The Greenhouse Development Rights Framework" -
an important policy framework for how to mitigate climate change while ensuring
an equitable path to development for the Global South.

• The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change - link to the


official UNFCCC website with information about the UN climate policy process.

• NASA - scientific reports, interactive maps, resources for kids, and more

• RealClimate.org - a blog of climate science, written by climate scientists

• Climate Safety - a very useful new report about current climate science, policy,
and solutions

• Pew Center on Climate Change - helpful information about climate science and
international policy

Вам также может понравиться