Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
WM. R. PARRISH
Phillips Petroleum Company, BartlesuiNe, OK 74004 (U.S. A)
(Received May 9, 1985; accepted in final form June 6, 1985)
ABSTRACT
Parrish, Wm. R., 1986. Compressed liquid densities of propane-normal butane mixtures
between 10 and 60°C at pressures up to 9.6 MPa. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 25: 65-90.
Compressed liquid densities for propane-normal butane mixtures are reported at six
temperatures between 10 and 60% For each isotherm, there are at least seven compositions
ranging between 10 and 75 mol% propane at pressures from near saturation up to 9.65 MPa.
The derived excess volumes are negative and represent a maximum of 0.5 percent of the
mixture volume at 1O’C. At 60°C, the excess volume can be up to 2.2% of the mixture
volume. In addition to the binary data, limited density measurements were made on ternary
mixtures containing up to 17 molX ethane.
INTRODUCTION
Although large quantities of Natural Gas Liquids (NGL) are bought and
sold on a volumetric basis, there is a surprising paucity of density data for
NGL-like mixtures at typical metering temperatures and pressures. The
purpose of this paper is to provide density data on mixtures of the primary
components of NGL-propane, normal butane and ethane. These data can
be used to evaluate existing density correlations and to develop new correla-
tions if necessary.
Nine sets of density data exist in the open literature for the propane-n
butane system. However, the data of Hiza et al., (1977), and Thompson and
Miller (1980) were at LNG temperatures. The data of Kay (1970) started at
71°C. Kahre (1973) obtained saturated liquid densities of five
propane-butane mixtures at 15.6 and 54.4OC. Luo and Miller (1981) gave
the liquid density for an 89 mol% propane mixture at 156°C and 0.90 MPa.
The saturated liquid data of Nysewander et al. (1940) include six mixtures
and cover the 37.8-138°C range. Thomas et al. (1963) presented saturated
liquid density data for three mixtures in the 20-50°C range. However, only
two studies have been made in the compressed liquid region where most
metering occurs. Acosta (1975) measured compressed liquid densities for
three propane-butane mixtures at 37.8”C at pressures between 3.4 and 13.8
MPa. Tomlinson (1971) reported densities on a 99.11 molS propane mixture
at temperatures between 6.7 and 54.4”C at pressures up to 13.8 MPa.
This paper presents compressed liquid densities for propane-normal
butane mixtures at 10.0, 15.6, 26.7, 37.8, 48.9 and 6O.O”C.For each isotherm,
data were obtained for seven or more compositions ranging between 10 and
75 mol% propane at pressures from near saturation to 9.65 MPa. Also, a
limited amount of data were obtained for mixtures containing up to 17 mol%
of added ethane. Wherever possible, the experimental results are compared
with the data of other investigators.
.
+ BUTANE
IN
RELIEF
VALVE
+e
DATA REDUCTION
Fig. 2. Comparison between pure propane experimental densities and densities computed
using modified BWR equation of state. The data plotted include (+) this work, ( X) Ely and
Kobayashi (1978), (A) Haynes (1983), (O), Kratzke and Mliller (1985), (0) Thomas and
Harrison (1982) and (0) Tomlinson (1971).
69
TABLE 1
Comparison between experimental and calculated densities for pure propane ’
a Densities calculated using modified BWR equation of state given in the Appendix.
b Deviation defined as ( pcalc- p,,)/p,,,,. Average error is root mean square average
whereas bias is simple arithmetic average.
’ This excludes the 54.4”C data point which has a deviation of 0.37%.
d This excludes the 26.7”C, 1.62 MPa data point which has a deviation of - 3.37%.
parisons with the propane data of Ely (1978), Haynes (1983), Kratzke and
Miiller (1985), Tomlinson (1971), and Thomas and Harrison (1982) in the
temperature and pressure range of this study. Table 1 summarizes the
comparison between the various studies. The data of Thomas et al. (1963)
was omitted because the data show a systematic error which increased to
over one percent at the higher temperatures.
ERROR ANALYSIS
DISCUSSION
TABLE 2
Densities and excess volumes of propane-n-butane mixtures as a function of temperature
and pressure
TABLE 2 (continued)
TABLE 2 (continued)
TABLE 2 (continued)
TABLE 2 (continued)
TABLE 2 (continued)
TABLE 2 (continued)
TABLE 2 (continued)
TABLE 2 (continued)
TABLE 2 (continued)
TABLE 2 (continued)
Temperature Mole fraction Pressure Density Excess
(“C) propane (MPa) (pm cme3) volume a
(cm3 mol-‘)
48.89 0.7500 1.38 0.4804 - 1.12
1.45 0.4807 - 1.10
1.52 0.4810 -1.09
1.59 0.4813 - 1.08
1.65 0.4816 - 1.07
1.72 0.4819 - 1.06
1.90 0.4825 - 1.01
2.07 0.4832 - 0.99
2.41 0.4845 - 0.93
2.76 4.4858 - 0.88
4.14 0.4907 - 0.73
5.52 0.4951 - 0.60
6.89 0.4991 - 0.50
8.27 0.5029 - 0.43
9.65 0.5064 - 0.38
60.00 0.0990 1.38 0.5236 - 0.62
2.76 0.5276 - 0.48
4.14 0.5312 - 0.39
5.52 0.5346 - 0.33
6.89 0.5378 - 0.28
8.27 0.5409 - 0.24
9.65 0.5438 - 0.22
0.2033 1.38 0.5155 - 1.25
2.76 0.5197 - 0.96
4.14 0.5236 - 0.78
5.52 0.5272 - 0.66
6.89 0.5306 - 0.56
8.27 0.5338 - 0.49
9.65 0.5368 - 0.44
0.2996 1.38 0.5073 - 1.70
2.76 0.5118 - 1.30
4.14 0.5159 - 1,04
5.52 0.5197 - 0.86
6.89 0.5233 - 0.74
8.27 0.5267 -0.64
9.65 0.5298 - 0.57
0.3991 1.38 0.4981 - 2,07
2.76 0.5030 - 1.56
4.14 0.507s - 1.24
5.52 0.511s - 1.02
6.89 0.5153 - 0,86
8.27 0.5189 = 0.75
9.65 0.5222 - 0.66
81
TABLE 2 (continued)
a The excess volumes are tabulated to 0.01 cm3 mol-’ to show trends only. Uncertainty in
the pure fluid molar volumes is - 0.2 cm3 mol- ‘.
82
TABLE 3
Densities and excess volumes of ethane-propane- n-butane mixtures as a function of temper-
ature and pressure
TABLE 3 (continued)
TABLE 3 (continued)
a The excess volumes are tabulated to 0.01 cm3 mol-’ to show trends only. Uncertainty in
the pure fluid molar volumes is - 0.2 cm3 mol-‘.
85
0” -0.6
w
pressure and composition. Also included in the table are excess volumes VE,
calculated using
where V,,, , and V; represent the molar volumes of the mixture and the pure
fluid i, respectively, all at the same temperature and pressure; xi is the
mixture mole fraction of component i. All pure fluid volumes in this paper
were calculated using the BWR equation given in the Appendix. It should be
noted that there is a systematic deviation of 0.08-0.11 cm3 mol-’ between
the calculated and measured propane molar volumes. (There is no systematic
deviation for the butane data because calculated values were used in the
calibration of the densitometer.) This deviation has the effect of reducing the
size of excess volume and introduces a possible bias in the excess volumes of
up to 0.1 cm3 mol -‘. Hence, the values are tabulated to 0.01 cm3 mol-’ to
indicate trends only.
Figure 3 shows excess volumes for the propane-butane system at 6.90
MPa as a function of composition at three temperatures. The figure shows a
good comparison between this work and Acosta’s data (1975) which had a
reported estimated uncertainty of 0.4%. At this pressure the maximum error
in assuming the system to be ideal ( VE = 0) would be -=z1% over the entire
composition range.
One would expect the minimum in the excess volume to occur at a
propane mole fraction of 0.6-0.7 instead of near equimolar as indicated in
Fig. 3. Correcting for the possible bias in the propane molar volumes
86
I
! I I I I I I I, I / I1
2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0
PRESSURE, (MPa)
Fig. 4. Equimolar excess volumes for the propane-butane system as a function of pressure
and temperature. Open symbols represent this work. The symbol (A) denotes the saturated
liquid data point of Kahre (1973) for a 0.4830 mole fraction propane mixture. Other closed
symbols indicate Acosta’s (1975) data for a 0.50191 mole fraction propane mixture. The bar
(I) represents - 0.1% in molar volume.
mentioned above shifts the minimum to between 0.6 and 0.7 mole fraction.
However, the correction is unjustifiable since it is one-half of the estimated
uncertainty in the actual data.
0.1 -
0.0 0.50 0.10 0.15
MOLE FRACTION ETHANE IN 3/ 1
PROPANE/BUTANE MIXURE
CONCLUSIONS
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
APPENDIX
To compute the pure fluid densities needed in this work we used the
32-term modified equation of state (McCarty, 1980). The mathematical form
of the equation is
P = pRT+ p’(G(l)T+ G(2)T”‘+ G(3) + G(4)/T+ G(5)/T2)
REFERENCES
Acosta, C.J.R., 1975. Densities and Viscosities in the System Ethane, Propane, and n-Butane.
Ph.D. Thesis, Kansas University, Lawrence, KS, 272 pp.
Ely, J.F. and Kobayashi, R., 1978. Isochoric pressure-volume-temperature measurements for
compressed liquid propane. J. Chem. Eng. Data, 23: 221-3.
Haynes, W.M., 1983. Measurements of densities and dielectric constants of liquid propane
from 90 to 300 K at pressures up to 35 MPa. J. Chem. Thermodyn., 15: 419-24.
Hiza, M.J., Haynes, W.M. and Parrish, W.R., 1977. Orthobaric liquid densities and excess
volumes for binary mixtures of low molar-mass alkanes and nitrogen between 105 and 140
K. J. Chem. Thermodyn., 9: 873-896.
Kahre, R.C., 1973. Liquid density of light hydrocarbon mixtures. J. Chem. Eng. Data, 18:
267-70.
Kay, W.B., 1970. Vapor liquid equilibrium relations of binary systems. Propane-n-alkane
systems. n-Butane and n-pentane. J. Chem. Eng. Data, 15: ,46-52.
Kratzke, H. and Mtller, S. 1985. Thermodynamic quantities for propane 3. The thermody-
namic behaviors of saturated and compressed liquid propane. J. Chem. Thermodyn., 16:
1157-1174.
Luo, C.C. and Miller, R.C., 1981. Densities and dielectric constants for LPG components and
mixtures at cryogenic and standard temperatures. Cryogenics, 21: 85-93.
McCarty, R.D., 1980. Four mathematical models for the prediction of LNG densities. Natl.
Bur. of Stand. (U.S.), Tech. Note 1030, 84 pp.
Nysewander, C.N., Sage, B.H. and Lacey, W.N., 1940. Phase equilibria in hydrocarbon
systems, the propane-n butane system in the critical region. Ind. Eng. Chem., 32: 118-23.
90