Article 2(4), UN Charter: Speaking footnote

Charter of the United Nations, Art. 2(4), 1 UNTS XVI (October 22, 1945)

U.S. Department Of Defense, Dictionary Of Military And Associated Terms, Feb 15, 2016.
U.S. Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms, Joint Publication 1-02
(February 15, 2016)

Agreement of the Prevention of Dangerous Military Activities, (June 12, 1989) U.S.- U.S.S.R, 28
I.L.M. 877.
 Agreement of the Prevention of Dangerous Military Activities, U.S.- U.S.S.R, 28 I.L.M. 877, (June
12, 1989)

Nico Schrijver, The Ban on the Use of Force in the UN Charter, The Oxford Handbook of the Use of
Force in International Law (Jan 2015)
 Nico Schrijver, The Ban on the Use of Force in the UN Charter, THE OXFORD HANDBOOK OF THE
USE OF FORCE IN INTERNATIONAL LAW (Jan 2015)

Cyber War: The Next Threat to National Security and What to Do About It, 1-9 (Kindle ed. 2010).
RICHARD A. CLARKE AND ROBERT KNAKE, CYBERWAR: THE NEXT THREAT TO NATIONAL SECURITY
AND WHAT TO DO ABOUT IT, 1-9(2010)

Waxman, Matthew C. "Cyber-attacks and the use of force: Back to the future of Article 2 (4)." Yale J.
Int'l L. 36 (2011): 421.
Waxman, Matthew C, Cyber-attacks and the use of force: Back to the future of Article 2 (4), 2 Yale J.
Int'l L. 36 (2011).

Charter of the United Nations, 1940, Art. 51.

Charter of the United Nations, Art. 51, 1 UNTS XVI (October 22, 1945)

Oil Platforms, Iran v. United States, Judgment, [1996] ICJ Rep 803
Oil Platforms Judgment (Iran v. United States) 1996 ICJ Rep 803

Caroline Affair.
- The Caroline v. United States, (1813) 11 U.S. 7 Cranch 496

Brownlie
CRAWFORD, JAMES, AND IAN BROWNLIE, BROWNLIE'S PRINCIPLES OF PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW,
(2012)

Bruno Simma, ed, The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary, 2d ed (Oxford: University Press,
2002) at 117-118; Oil Platforms, Iran v United States, Judgment, [1996] ICJ Rep 803.
-BRUNO SIMMA, THE CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS: A COMMENTARY, VOLUME II, 117-118,
(3RD EDITION 2002)

Guyana v Suriname, para 461.

- GUYANA V SURINAME, AWARD, 2007 PCA (ICGJ) 370, ¶461

ron H. Nordiquest, ed, United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982: A Commentary, Vol. II
p. 815
 MYRON NORDQUIST, UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA: A COMMENTARY,
VOLUME II, 815, (1982)

Arbitration concerning Heathrow Airport Use Charges (USA/United Kingdom) (1992) XXIV RIAA
Arbitration concerning Heathrow Airport Use Charges (USA v. United Kingdom), 1992 RIAA XXIV

Guyana v Suriname, para 478.

 GUYANA V SURINAME, AWARD, 2007 PCA (ICGJ) 370, ¶478
AUTHORITY??

Article 74(3), UNCLOS.

United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Article 74(3), 1982

Article 83(3), UNCLOS.

United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Article 74(3), 1982

Advisory Opinion on the Legality on the Use by a State of Nuclear Weapons in Armed Conflict,
[1996] ICJ Rep 226, para 29; Subsequently endorsed in Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v
Uruguay) [2010] ICJ Rep 14, para 101.
-Advisory Opinion on the Legality on the Use by a State of Nuclear Weapons in Armed Conflict,
1996 ICJ Rep 226, ¶ 29; Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v Uruguay) 2010 ICJ Rep 14, ¶
101.

Article 192 and194, UNCLOS

United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Article 192 &194, 1982
.
AUTHORITY??
AUTHORITY??

Agean Sea Continental Shelf Case (1976)

 Aegean Sea Continental Shelf (Greece v. Turk.), 1976 I.C.J. 3.

https://pangea.stanford.edu/ERE/pdf/IGAstandard/SGW/2013/Karason.pdf;

https://pangea.stanford.edu/ERE/db/WGC/papers/WGC/2015/37011.pdf

Guyana v Suriname Case

GUYANA V SURINAME, AWARD, 2007 PCA (ICGJ) 370, ¶478
Guyana v Suriname Case, p 467
GUYANA V SURINAME, AWARD, 2007 PCA (ICGJ) 370, ¶467

Article 117, UNCLOS.

United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Article 117, 1982

Article 118, UNCLOS.

United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Article 118, 1982

Article 192 and 194(1), UNCLOS.

United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Article 192 &194(1), 1982

Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions (Greece v. UK)

MAVROMMATIS PALESTINE CONCESSIONS (GREECE V. U.K.), 1924 P.C.I.J. (SER. B) NO. 3

Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions (Greece v. UK)

MAVROMMATIS PALESTINE CONCESSIONS (GREECE V. U.K.), 1924 P.C.I.J. (SER. B) NO. 3

Article 1 (Speaking Footnote)

Case Concerning Ahmadou Sadio Diallo, Guinea v Congo, the Democratic Republic
of the, Preliminary Objections [2012] ICJ Rep 324, ¶39.
 CASE CONCERNING AHMADOU SADIO DIALLO, PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS, (GUINEA V CONGO),
2012 ICJ REP 324, ¶39.

D.R. Shea The Calvo Clause: A Problem of Inter-American and International Law
and Diplomacy (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1955).
D.R. SHEA, THE CALVO CLAUSE: A PROBLEM OF INTER-AMERICAN AND INTERNATIONAL LAW AND
DIPLOMACY (1955)

Barcelona Traction Case paras 78-80.

Barcelona Traction, Light, and Power Co., Ltd (Belgium v. Spain), 1970 ICJ 1, ¶78-80

The relationship between DP and investment treaties, ICSID Review.

Ben Juratowitch, The relationship between Diplomatic Protection and Investment Treaties, ICSID
REVIEW: FOREIGN INVESTMENT LAW JOURNAL 23(1) (2008), 33

fitzmaurice, ‘some problems regarding the formal sources of international law’ ;

Gerald G. Fitzmaurice, Some Problems Regarding the Formal Sources of International Law, SOURCES
OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, (1st Ed. 2004)
General/Particular International Law and Primary/Secondary Rules: Unitary
Terminology of a Fragmented System (European Journal of International Law)
Anastasios Gourgourinis, General/Particular International Law and Primary/Secondary Rules:
Unitary Terminology of a Fragmented System, 4 EJIL 22 (2011)

Art. 27 ICSID
Convention, Rules and Regulation, ICSID, Article 27 (April 2006)

Annex 4, Article 5.
Factsheet, Annex 4, Article 5

citation 54 from OUP article

Anastasios Gourgourinis, General/Particular International Law and Primary/Secondary Rules:
Unitary Terminology of a Fragmented System, 4 EJIL 22 (2011)

Corn Products v. Mexico, SpA v. Algeria award (2008).

Corn Products International, Inc. v. United Mexican States, ICSID ARB (AF)/04/1; L.E.S.I. S.p.A. and
ASTALDI S.p.A. v. République Algérienne Démocratique et Populaire, 2008 ICSID ARB/05/3

Art 15(e), Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection; Mavrommatis Case, find some
more authorities.

Algeria Accords: Iranian Hostage Crisis.

See, for example, Steiner and Gross v. Polish State 30 March 1928, 1927-1928,
Annual Digest of Public International Law Cases, vol. 4, p. 472; American
International Group Inc. v. Iran, Award No. 93-2-3, Iran-U.S.-C.T.R., vol. IV (1983),
p. 96; S. Schwebel International Arbitration: Three Salient Problems (Cambridge:
Grotius Publishers, 1987), pp. 117-121; Commentary Draft Articles on DP;

Kenya v. World Duty Free.

Palma v. Bulgaria

Malicorp v. Egypt.

Annex 7

Metal-Tech Ltd. v. Republic of Uzbekistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/10/3, Award, ¶236. See also ICC
Case No. 13515; ICC Case No. 1110.
Filler, E.A. , Chapter 3: Commercial Mediation in Europe, Commercial Mediation in Europe: An
Empirical Study of the User Experience, Global Trends in Dispute Resolution, Volume 5 (Kluwer Law
International 2012)
Arbitration and crime article
Waguih v. Egypt; International Law Commission, Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for
Internationally Wrongful Acts, UN Official Records of the General Assembly, 56th session, Part One,
Chapter II, Art. 7 Commentary, ¶2 (November 2001), available at
(http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/9_6_2001.pdf).

Ziadé, N.G. 'Curing the Illness Without Killing the Patient: Prescribing Appropriate Remedies for
Findings of Illegality in Investment Arbitration', in Andrea Menaker (ed), International Arbitration and
the Rule of Law: Contribution and Conformity, ICCA Congress Series, Volume 19 (Kluwer Law
International 2017)

Jean Kalicki, Mallory Silberman, et al., 'What Are Appropriate Remedies for Findings of Illegality in
Investment Arbitration?', in Andrea Menaker (ed), International Arbitration and the Rule of Law:
Contribution and Conformity, ICCA Congress Series, Volume 19 (Kluwer Law International 2017)

Cheng, B., Article VI of the 1967 Space Treaty Revisited: ‘International Responsibility’, ‘National
Activities’, and ‘The Appropriate State’ (1998) 26:1 Journal of Space Law, 7, at 9.
Collard-Dutilleul, F. and Delebecque, P., Contrats Civils et Commerciaux,(Dalloz: Paris, 1998), § 235,
at 193.
Kayser, V., Launching space objects: Issues of liability and future prospects. Vol. 1. Springer Science
& Business Media, 2006
The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1980, Art. 32.

Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of
Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, 1967, Art. 6.
Compromis, ¶9, (“conduct workshop”)
NASO-ESRO contract, Art. 2(b).
Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of
Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, 1967, Art. 6.
J.H. Herz, ‘Expropriation of Foreign Property’ (1941) 35 AJIL 243
Felix Claim (1961) 42 ILR 161; Henke Claim (1958-II) 26 ILR 276; General Electric Company Claim
(1959) 30 ILR 140; Pietrzak Claim (1962) 56 AJIL 1110.
Article 3, annex 3.
Bin Cheng, General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (London:
Stevens, 1953) at 40