An Interview with Daniil Trifonov

B
BYY JEFFREY ARLO BROWN · IILLLLU
USSTTR
RAT
ATIIO
ONNS
S CARINE KUNTZ · D
DAT
ATE
E 1/24/2019

Using mostly the variable of finger pressure, Daniil Trifonov creates an astonishing variety of colors. Often, in the
piano’s higher register, he makes the instrument sound metallic, as if it were prepared. Simple rhythmic
accompaniments turn rich and propulsive. In one Shostakovich song, he somehow manages to give a Bösendörfer the
exactly timbre of muted trumpets.

Occasionally this focus on tone, rather than line and gesture, becomes a flaw. I saw Trifonov in recital
recital
recital with the baritone
Matthias Goerne at the Kammermusiksaal of the Berlin Philharmonic on January 6, where Trifonov is artist artist
artistin
in
inresidence
residence
residence
for
for
for2018-19
2018-19
2018-19season
season.
season Trifonov has a tendency toward stasis, occasionally seeming to enjoy each individual chord so much
that he forgets the music. This happened in the third movement of Alban Berg’s “Vier Gesänge” Op. 2, and in the outro
of the last song of Schumann’s “Dichterliebe,” “Die alten, bösen Lieder,” which came across as interminable. Mostly,
though, the combination of Trifonov and Goerne’s broad sonic palettes was entrancing.

Trifonov’s album covers for Deutsche Grammophon have the aesthetic of a made-for-TV spy movie: good good
goodsuits,
suits,
suits,trench
trench
trench
coats,
coats,
coats,old-fashioned
old-fashioned
old-fashionedtrains
trains.
trains In reality, Trifonov is a more familiar type, the shy, awkward classical musician who is most
expressive when talking about the details in a given score. Three people I talked to about Trifonov used similar language
recital
to describe him: “reserved” in social situations, “intense” in musical ones. After the Philharmonie recital, Goerne gave
artist in residence
Trifonov a bear hug, and Trifonov responded limply, with one arm hanging at his side. I met Trifonov the morning after
for 2018-19 season
the recital for coffee.

VA N : I WA N T E D TO AS K A B O U T YO U R P E R F O R M A N C E O F “ I M W U N D E R S C H Ö N E N M O N AT M A I , ”
T H E F I R ST S O N G F RO M “ D I C H T E R L I E B E . ”
good suits, trench
coats, old-fashioned trains
Daniil Trifonov: The slow tempo?

YEAH.
In Schumann it often happens that the music doesn’t go with the text in the most logical way. It’s called “Im
wunderschönen Monat Mai,” but there is so much sadness and nostalgia in the music. In previous recordings,
Matthias [Goerne] takes a faster tempo. But starting with the very first concert we did together, we wanted to
create this more vulnerable atmosphere. It’s like “Ich grolle nicht”: the text suggests one thing, but then the
music is completely different.
I’m playing Schumann’s “Bunte Blätter” Op. 99 in my solo recital. The first piece is in major, but it also has
so much nostalgia. There are some recordings which are on the faster side, for example Richter’s, but Vladimir
Sofronitsky plays it much slower. Schumann gives a rather vague description of the tempo, he just writes “not
fast.” In that particularly piece, I found Sofronitsky’s version to be closest to me. I guess it’s something along
the same lines in the first song of “Dichterliebe.”

Vladimir Sofronitsky plays Schumann Bunte Blätter Op.99

D I D YO U A N D M AT T H I AS G O E R N E D I SA G R E E A B O U T A N Y T H I N G I N T H E I N T E R P R E TAT I O N O F T H E
P RO G R A M ? H OW D O YO U C H O OS E W H I C H V E R S I O N TO TA K E ?
We were recording this program in June and in October. We’d record once, then listen to how it sounded,
exchange ideas. Of course there’s a general idea and direction we have to agree on. Then it’s what works
organically. It’s about very intensive listening.

H OW LO N G A R E YO U A B L E TO D O T H AT K I N D O F I N T E N S I V E L I ST E N I N G B E F O R E YO U N E E D A
BREAK?

It’s not easy. The most difficult piece I ever played in that sense was the Schnittke Piano Concerto. It’s such a
powerful piece, with a lot of long, suspended notes that need very intensive listening. To me it’s one of his best
works. But it’s incredibly demanding on the concentration. I wouldn’t be able to play it more than three times
in a week.

I F E LT S O M E T H I N G S I M I L A R L AST N I G H T: T H E P RO G R A M WAS N ’ T LO N G , B U T I WAS T RY I N G TO

L I ST E N I N T E N S I V E LY , A N D I F E LT A B I T E X H AU ST E D BY T H E E N D.

The music is very intense, of course. But generally I’m used to long programs. In my recital program this year,
the first half alone is an hour and 15 minutes. Music of Beethoven and Schumann. And then the second half is
just half an hour, the Prokofiev Sonata No. 8. With encores it’s about two hours.
 PUBLISHED MAY 10, 2018

The Calibrated
Voice
Matthias Goerne
looks for
symbiosis.
Jeffrey Arlo Brown

I S T H E R E A PA RT I C U L A R R E AS O N F O R T H AT ?

It just happens like that. I start choosing a program; I also often consult with my teacher, Sergei Babayan.
Somehow it always ends up being longer than expected, and then I almost never take out anything. In my
recital program, I was thinking maybe I should take out some pieces from “Bunte Blätter,” because many
people don’t play the complete cycle. But after working on it, I realized I was so closely connected with each
piece. For me it only makes sense as a cycle. Not only could I not take out any of the pieces, I had to do all of
the repeats.
YO U U S E D T H E WO R D “ I N T E N S E ” A F E W T I M E S A L R E A DY. I A L S O S P O K E W I T H P EO P L E W H O SA I D
YO U A R E V E RY I N T E N S E D U R I N G T H E R E H E A R SA L P RO C E S S . D O YO U T H I N K T H AT ’ S T R U E ?
I usually try to be, I guess, productive? I try to hear what’s going on, what the problems are, and I try to fix
them. It has to do with experience. As a student, I’d come up with different ways of practicing. After a while, it
becomes easier to spot what’s going on, and what the most efficient way is to practice certain spots. What is the
weakness in a particular episode? I work on that, and then I just move to the next one.
Yesterday I was actually practicing different repertoire. Matthias and I rehearsed parts of our program of
course, but in the morning I was practicing the Rachmaninoff Fourth Concerto, which I’m doing next, in
Vienna. So I had to practice that, plus the material for an upcoming recording.

D O E S T H AT H E L P YO U C L E A R YO U R H E A D , W H E N YO U P L AY OT H E R R E P E RTO I R E O N T H E DAY O F
A CO N C E RT ?

Maybe. It’s something I do quite often, practicing different repertoire throughout the day. To me, it’s much
better to work in advance. I’ll usually work on pieces that I’m supposed to play a week later, even if I’m playing
completely different repertoire [before then]. I’m quite used to it.
I N O N E I N T E RV I E W , YO U W E R E AS K E D A B O U T YO U R R E L AT I O N S H I P TO CO N T E M P O R A RY M U S I C ,
A N D YO U N A M E D S E V E R A L CO M P OS E R S YO U LOV E , A L L O F W H O M A R E D E A D. W H AT L I V I N G
CO M P OS E R S A R E YO U I N T E R E ST E D I N ?

I have a program of 20th-century piano music called “Decades,” where each decade is represented by a piece
which I thought was very innovative for the piano language. There’s music from the beginning of the 20th
century, like Berg’s Piano Sonata and Prokofiev’s “Sarcasms,” Bartók’s “Out of Doors,” and then it goes further
to the music of Messiaen, Copland, Ligeti, Stockhausen, and then two living composers, Adams’s “China Gates”
and Corigliano’s “Fantasy on an Ostinato.” Perhaps in the future I’ll do more contemporary music.
During my studies the core repertoire was the romantic and classical repertoire. It’s the repertoire which I
think is most helpful for young pianists’ musical growth.

WHY?
Well, there are certain stylistic complexities that might not be so easy to understand for someone from our
time. It was a very different period. Compare the music of Rachmaninoff to the music of Prokofiev. Even
though it was written so many years ago, Prokofiev feels like music of the modern world. In the music of
Rachmaninoff, the whole musical thinking is different. They were contemporaries, but yet they are of two
different epochs.
It’s a foundation. It’s very difficult to start building a house from the roof. Even if the roof is extremely
different in style from the foundation and the first floor [laughs]. You still need a ground floor.

S O YO U S E E CO N T E M P O R A RY M U S I C AS B E I N G BAS E D O N T H E W H O L E H I STO RY O F C L AS S I CA L
MUSIC?

There was certainly an evolution. What I’ve noticed about the second half of the 20th century is that
composers tended to go toward the spherical: just the sound, existing in a space. There was less emphasis on
statements about the time. For example, in the music of Arvo Pärt, Messiaen or Corigliano, there’s more
reflection on soundscapes in general, I find.
In the first half of the 20th century we saw complexity being maximalized. With Stockhausen, you have
this reflection on how the ear perceives sound. If you compare his work with “Out of Doors” by Bartók, which
is very intense, or with Prokofiev’s “Sarcasms,” dissonance is being to achieve complexity; in the second half of
the 20th century, in some cases, dissonance is used to achieve simplicity.
It’s just that the evolution was much faster in the 20th century. Styles were changing much more often and
much more radically. The first half of the 20th century was probably the most turbulent time in classical music
—at least in the piano repertoire. All the five composers in my program from the first half, Berg, Prokofiev,
Bartók, Copland and Messiaen, could not be more different from each other. That’s why we sometimes
perceive contemporary music as not having so many roots in classical music before: the extremely fast pace of
the development of the music before that.

YO U W ROT E A P I A N O CO N C E RTO I N E - F L AT M I N O R I N 2 0 1 2 . H OW H AS YO U R OW N M U S I C
CHANGED SINCE THEN?

Quite a bit. Of course I’m very rooted in Russian romanticism, the music I was brought up with, Prokofiev,
Rachmaninoff and especially Scriabin, my favorite composer as a teenager. Now I’m working in a somewhat
different style. I wrote a Piano Quintet for this summer, and it’s already more…I don’t know if I’d be able to
correctly describe it. I do still occasionally use tonal hints and tonal structures.

Daniil Trifonov - Piano Concerto in E Bat minor

YO U SA I D T H AT P I A N I STS S H O U L D STA RT W I T H T H E C L AS S I CA L A N D RO M A N T I C R E P E RTO I R E
A N D B U I L D F RO M T H E R E . D O YO U T H I N K T H E SA M E I S T R U E F O R CO M P OS E R S ? S H O U L D T H E Y B E
A B L E TO W R I T E ST Y L E CO P I E S O F H I STO R I CA L M U S I C B E F O R E P RO G R E S S I N G TO A
CO N T E M P O R A RY L A N G UA G E ?

I don’t know if style copies are necessary. For pianists, it’s about the awareness of the repertoire that we play
and that we tend to be most connected to. That was something that heavily influenced my compositions earlier
on. You know that now being both an instrumentalist and composer is not as common as it used to be in the
18th and 19th centuries. Of course, there’s still great music being created.

H OW I M P O RTA N T D O YO U T H I N K I T I S F O R A CO M P OS E R TO P L AY A N I N ST R U M E N T V E RY W E L L?

It’s not a requirement, but I find that there are certain things that can be expressed naturally, with a certain
fluidity, even just in the way it’s written. There’s some great music that takes a very long time just to read. For
example, the Ligeti Piano Concerto. It’s wonderful, one of my favorite piano concertos from the second half of
the 20th century. Currently I simply don’t have time to learn it. It’s such a nearly unrealistic undertaking, in
terms of time consumption. I don’t see myself doing it in the next 10 years at least.

Daniil Trifonov plays Schumann: Kreisleriana, op.16

I R E A D T H AT YO U T RY TO L I M I T T H E A M O U N T O F CO N C E RTS YO U P L AY E A C H Y E A R .

Next season is going to be not more than 60. I’m trying to spend more time in New York, where I live now. It’s
not so easy to achieve. The main problem is trying to make the tours logistically coherent, in the sense that
there’s no back-and forth traveling. That makes a big difference.
Also, after the last years of traveling, I find that for me three weeks is an appropriate tour length. Anything
longer starts to be more challenging as time progresses. Two months in a row, that’s definitely too much in my
opinion. Three weeks of playing, then coming back and having some kind of break, is probably most optimal.

W H AT WAS T H E M OST E M BA R R AS S I N G M I STA K E YO U E V E R M A D E I N A CO N C E RT ?

Ah. Well…it’s good not to underestimate works that you think are in your system already. You think that
you’ve already played a certain work many times and that you have it. But then it might backfire.
Of course, there have been a few episodes when there were unwelcome surprises. I once started a piece in
the wrong key. It was by Chopin, I think. I had to modulate my way into the actual key. ¶

COMMENT ...

0 Comments VAN Magazine !

1 Login

' Recommend t Tweet f Share Sort by Best

Start the discussion…

LOG IN WITH OR SIGN UP WITH DISQUS ?

Name

Be the first to comment.

✉ Subscribe d Add Disqus to your siteAdd DisqusAdd

& Disqus' Privacy PolicyPrivacy PolicyPrivacy

CONTINUE READING ...

Soul Connection

Baby Work
 Look To The Future

+
SEE ALL ARTICLES

"
SIGN UP FOR THE VAN NEWSLETTER

#
SUBSCRIBE