Aysha ..

Mother of Ours

Edited By A Bunch of brothers

AAH

This is in reply to accusations( highlighted in gray) directed by an anonymous Rafidhi

guy, targeting Aysha, the favorite wife of Prophet Mohammad (PBUH). This is a
document expressing the perspective of major Sunnie clerics and scholars, explaining
most of the tactics of those Rafidha who had always been on the course of shaking the
Islamic state, all the time, and everywhere, garnished by a further Mu'tazili highlights
of mine, to fit the Western mode of analysis, excluding any apologetic accent .They
cover for their intentions by fallacies committed by any ruler, be him an Umayyad,
Abbasid , or Ottoman. When it was time for them to take over, as The Fatimid state
in Egypt, or the Iranian so-called Islamic Regime of Khomeini , they could not but
repeat the same fallacies and atrocities of their opponents, even larger in scale and
deeper in cruelty. Some say that history repeats itself, actually, it is those stupid and
lying rulers who repeat history's incidents in stead .

This document is important not for Sunnie protagonists of Aysha and all other Islamic
icons too, it is rather important for moderate and reasonable Shiites who seem to be
ignorant of these accusations, and not acknowledged of what their folks are up to,
always fueling these troublesome issues that are 1400 years old by now . Burying our
heads in the sand won't do our butts any good!!

In one old Iraqi joke, dating back to those seventies, an Iraqi fellow is there attending
a European technology fair in UK , and he is there in front of that huge computer of
those days . Feeling astonished and amazed to what is written there about this thing ,
(The Machine That Has All The Answers),he directs the typical Iraqi question, or
should I be calling it (The inevitable starter at every meeting between Iraqis), he asks
(Shaku Maku = slang for "What's Up? Anything New? ", and the whole computer set
just exploded, sort of committing suicide for the impossible question that asked the
poor equipment to show all that is inside it.
This is to give you a brief idea how difficult is this issue that you have chosen to
indulge into, and I know that I ought to respect your choice and applaud your courage,
but as much as I am concerned, none of the points mentioned here in the embedded
stuff, nor any other material coming our way next to this, should ever be approached
any briefly, these are the stubborn tips of the Islamic conflicts iceberg, they survived
some 14 centuries of time, always being the cause for fragmentation and divergence
from the moderate and middle line of religion and history approach. I will do as you
requested, marking the availability of each cause, and do my part ,a Shaku Maku
thing, to highlight what lies between the lines wherever it looks a must to me, for I am
not to approve what I read unless I test it first, to all relevant tracks here and there, as
well as viewing it from a rational perspective too . I have just pointed out that it is
very daring from your side to approach it since it is very thorny field , due to so many
reasons:
1. Arabic language, as revealed in Quran ( understood to be edited by
God Himself ), is not that easy to be decisive about its meanings here and
there ,not for regular or casual Arab fellows, for when the Deity brings this
text (I Do Not Swear By Judgment Day), it is the opposite to be understood
here . Alternatively , the Formal Arabic language, the one used for centuries
by now, differentiates male from female persons pronouns, unlike in
English ,Kurdish ,Turkmen or Persian. You, English language users are
mandated to address female & male singular or plural pronouns as just (You),
as long as old English is not used . Most meanings of those terms back when
the Quran was first introduced are never like understood today, and that is why
you find most of the paradoxes met are about the meanings of those terms
,language stuff, in an atmosphere where words might have "tones" or shades,
each one picks the degree or tone according to his own vision and polarity
from both sides of the debate river. Also, there are plenty of things left without
any clear explanation, the scholars tend to give their own understanding,
ending it with a cliché (And God Is Far More Knowledgeable), to refrain from
any guilt of misleading people ,unintentionally. The progress of time makes
some of the puzzling issues unfold, according to the advances made( e.g.
spherical shape of Earth, drowning of that Pharaoh who tracked Moses & his
people, The futuristic enmity with Jews and the loss of Palestine to them ,The
forthcoming defeat of Persians by Romans, The supremacy of Christians over
heathens till Judgment Day ..etc. Consider this example, where the Quran
describes the snake that Moses baton had turned into while confronting the
Pharaoh's team of wizards, as moving like a Jinn ,this is what is given there ,
Jinn, the Formal Arabic has two meanings for this word , either(Genie), that
creation, unseen and so powerful to the extent of building huge monuments for
king Solomon, or a little snake, which suggests a better meaning, because it is
logical to simulate that speed to something that people had already seen and
known, while genie info is not known to people . In another location, God
swears by the site of stars, and stresses it that this swearing is very great . It
could have meant something to the first Muslims, something like the
importance of astrology for navigation, while right now, it could inspire a far
greater meaning, referring to the significance of the light years, that distance
can be defined in terms of time (Speed of Light ) and how distant are stars
from us . Actually, I have a list of such paradoxes, we should never skip the
fact that Arabic words were written without dots, this makes it almost
impossible for non-Arabs by then, mainly Persians newly admitted into Islam
during Umayyad & Abbasid periods, to distinguish between these sets of
letters, similar in body build, but different through punctuation(dots) over
them:
( SS & DH) ‫ص & ض‬
(F & Q ) ‫ف & ق‬
( B,T,Th,N) ‫ب & ت & ث & ن‬
(H,Kh & J ) ‫ح & ج & خ‬
( S & Sh) ‫س & ش‬
 ( R & Z) ‫ر & ز‬
( TT & Dh) ‫ط & ظ‬
And it is not that easy to get over it, missing fluency in that old Arabic
language(while written), is sure to make you feel lost, how to spell this word
for example:
Light=‫نور‬
They used to write it without a dot,(Can't provide any image of it, there is
nothing like it in the Arabic Word MS !!)
It could be mistaken as :
، Bull =‫ثور‬
..... ،(Not fit for agriculture(land = ‫بور‬
Missing how to spell those letters that are similar to each other in shape,
except for a dot, two or three, here and there, could lead to fatal mistakes, one
might be saying ( month) in stead of (Staying Awake), or ( kill) or (kiss) even,
in stead of (accept )…check the shape of each couple, omitting the dots from
the words :
‫سهر‬... ‫شهر‬
‫ يقّبل‬، ‫ يقبل‬،‫يقتل‬

These are only some simple 3-letter examples to give you an idea, now
imagine the rest of Arabic words where there are so many letters like these
puzzling ones, seven to ten letters, you could go as far as tens and hundreds of
probabilities to form different words and their likes ,those Non-Arabs
(Mawali) surely had a hard time trying to understand the right thing and select
what form to follow. This applies only to the written form of Arabic, the
spoken Arabic is quite different, for sounds or voices are not alike, as you
surely understand. Pronouncing (Kill) is not necessarily like or similar to
pronouncing (Kiss), it is a phonetics thing that has nothing to do with viewing
by the eyes, and a language for lips, larynx, or teeth even. The ordinary Arab
would have no problem doing the right thing, it is the context of the whole
sentence that suggests which isotope to use, something that the Non-Arabs are
not to find it that easy, not in the first 1-2 centuries of Islamic state age. Now
what is the importance of this issue to the task of understanding Quran's
meanings? It is to tell you that people were busy following the original
" spoken " texts, using those difficult old Arabic letters, something leading to
"memorizing" rather than "understanding and digesting" the meanings, and it
is still up to these days, people here and there ,learn Quran by memorizing, not
through understanding and exploring its greatness. It is only when one of those
paradoxes unfolds into a similarity with a historical event, or an advancement
in science, that they hail it, and call it a miracle in stead . The disagreement
between Shiites & Sunnies over the issue of Wuthoo'(washing rituals before
praying), whether the feet are to be washed or just wiped, is originally adopted
after each school's understanding of the sequence given in Quran, a tiny little
grammar detail called (Fat-ha ) is the source of difference!!! If we were to
imagine the Quranic text downloaded using the current punctuation, commas,
and full stops ,..etc, too many issues would have been settled and agreed upon,
but this is just what meets the eyes, actually, these issues seem to have been
employed as a justification of schism, this is further assisted as we observe
how the Shiites deliberately play sides with Iranian clerics, against Sunnies,
while starting their Ramadhan and Eid seasons, they insist on satelliting
around Iran's church rather than any Arab one, even if the moon is proving it
to their naked eyes .Actually, it is really interesting to notice how both terms
spell and mean the same , Schism & Shiism !!!!Shiism means (Deviating from
the main stream),as in Quran.

2. One may get lost ,moving from one interpretation of a certain 'Aaya, as
preached by one sect, to another, relevant to a different school of faith, be that
school (Shiite,Sunni,Mu'tazili,Sufi, …etc).This intrigue is felt with some
disputed quotes of the Prophet ( Hadeeths), like Almahdi issue, I myself have
been raised believing that it is Jesus Christ who is to descend to earth, and lead
the final confrontation. Growing up to the age of college, I was made to come
in contact with Shiites from mid & southern provinces, and it was only then
that I was acknowledged of a Mahdi substitute for Jesus Christ. They claim to
be attributing their tale of Almahdi to one text ,in the same references of
Sunnie faith, this time they pick what suits them , that a descendant from
Prophet Mohammad's is to appear before Judgment Day is due, and lead the
final Armageddon to defeat the final enemies of Islam. This twisting of beliefs
is met in so many places, how to wash one's own feet while practicing
Wuthoo' before praying , substituting Fatima in stead of Mary, as being
regarded (Mistress of All Women On Earth), there seems to have been a keen
effort on building a Shiite substitute for every theme .Try asking your fellow
Shiites about both Almahdi vs, Jesus Christ, and the issue of Fatima vs. Mary,
and check why do they favor Moses titles for their newborn kids, while
Sunnies prefer Eisa(Jesus) in stead !! and why is it that they have chosen to
make their Imams twelve, like those for Moses!! . While tracking some texts
in Quran & Seera (Prophet's biography and daily conducts), almost all Shiite
scholar would at once seek Imam Ali and his dynasty to attribute all positive
texts to, and choose Sahaba and wives of the Prophet to attach any blame or
warning to , while Sunnie scholars have a few locations to do the same,
adopting some historical gestures mentioned in their references, that the
intended 'Aaya was meant for Abu Bakr , Omar, Ali, and else (They differ
from Shiites in that they regard all protagonists or Sahaba as equal somehow,
their list of favored names is Ali ,Husain & Hasan, same as Shiites do, while
Shiites deny any faith for any but Ali and his folks( protagonists and dynasty),
they despise at all Sahaba titles, Abu Bakr, Omar,Othman, and the same for all
Umayyad titles, Marwan,Sufyan,Yazeed …). The Mu'tazila, same as any
rational and moderate Shiite or Sunnie, would be using their reasoning tools to
get to the more generalized understanding of that 'Aaya ,that it does not
necessarily target any single person, seeing that Islam is far larger and more
great than any of those icons, they all died, while Islam is still living till today.
Speaking of myself, I have come to believe that there had been a fatal gap or
discontinuity of the flow of teaching , a missing link ,that led to missing very
important scriptures, elaboration and preaching received , witnessed and
memorized by companions (protagonists) of the Prophet, along with their sons
and grandsons who carried on relaying those texts to further generations, those
who had acquired so many authentic details about the meanings of those texts
and incidents relevant to them . I am telling this thing here, because you will
find that scholars in the first century of the Islamic age seem to have been
arguing , debating, and even quarrelling about some factoids and fine details
that ought to have been known to their forefathers! They should have been
acknowledged of what does shaking hands with a woman be like, whether it
demanded re-washing themselves as in Wuthoo', or it was OK, since no lust
was intended. In stead of that, they went as far as diving into the fine details
and the linguistic micro details, of an 'Aaya where Mary talks to God, how
come she conceive a fetus without not only being unmarried, but even more
than that, without even being "Touched " by any male human being ! Was she
referring to a physical contact / touch, or using the word as a metaphor that
maintains polite expressions rather than any exposed material ?This
interpolation frenzy consumed them all, and they might have been right in
doing so, the logical tools were not available yet, that the language of a whole
Deity is not up to people to judge, it is something to contemplate and wonder
about, rather than presuming a one and only meaning of it. Additionally, the
fights of those Murtaddeen (The tribes that refused to pay Zakat after
Mohammad was declared dead, and started to retreat back to Heathenism,
those fierce fighting with their heavy casualties amongst
(Memorizers=Keepers) seemed to devour the data base of so many of those
(Huffadh=Keepers by memorizing), another incident was when so many of
those Huffadh were lured to accompany pagan delegations , in order to teach
them more about Islam's laws and regulations, but they were executed out
there far from Madinah, the Prophet mourned them and was very sad for that
loss, they were called (Al Saffa people), poor and enthusiastic pioneers who
were very keen to learn more and more about Quran . When you trace the
evolution of Islamic factions , in the second century after the Prophet's
departure , you may be dazzled to see how uncertain those people were feeling
about too many issues of life, the whole thing was about going back to basics,
and each faction was restricting themselves to one track that is so different
from the others ( Imam Ali for Shiites vs. Any approved and well-qualified
Sahabi or protagonist ,for the Sunnie faith). The significance of this issue ,as
far as I am concerned, is that anyone like me and you, seeking to reach the
truth, has to pave his own way, and question his mind, rather than following
the trails as if a blind fellow .This is all because of the unlimited forging and
add-ons made by all competing parties . In fact, this is not improvised by me
alone, it is the Prophet's own advice as he said once " Question Your Heart No
Matter What Others Be Telling You", those others here were described as
(Muftoon & Mufteen, that is, the elite of the interpreters!!),i.e. each
Muslim( Presumable, an enlightened one, always reading and analyzing, not
like what you would be coming across as a majority, people caring for life
issues, and leave the religious stuff for clerics, saying, as in Shiite faith ,"
Leave It For A Cleric , And Enjoy Being Safe , That He Is The One To Be
Judged For It ,Later"!!! actually, each Muslim is his own interpreter and
interpolator as long there are more than one understanding of any issue , he
should not let a cleric guide him and dictate it to him, what to do, and how to
do it, he should not be lending his mind to others like what Shiites do and
most Sunnies too , he should not agree to deactivate his reasoning power, his
brains , the one that is said to be addressed by God, as the bliss granted to
man, and by which man will be persecuted and judged , . This is the main
 difference between my way of belief, and most Shiites and Sunnies too, but
Shiites are the top committers of this fallacy, having been straying away from
monotheism, right into an improvised Alawi faith, where they ask Ali and his
dynasty to bestow wealth and health on them, to protect them, to guard upon
them, to let them be admitted into Heavens on Judgment Day, as if back to
heathenism, under a new title, all under cover .
3. One need be fully aware of which poles to be using, Sunna vs.
Ja'farism, not against Shiia, and quite similarly, Alawite vs.
Umayyad/Abbasid/Khawarij . Things got mixed up so much later to those
eras, that any Shiite had been considered Ja'fari, which is not right by any
means. On the other hand, Sunna is a 4-branches faith, sourcing the Prophet's
way of living and worshipping, each through his Sheikh or Imam. There are
different views for each Sunnie school, as is the case with those between
different branches of Shiite faith. Missing these details prohibits any
understanding of the conflicts between all these schools. The main thing to
bring here, is that Shiite faith had started as a political party, namely the
Alawites, and was made to turn into a radical interpretation of Islamic Shari'a
and history, thus, a religious cover had been used to guard against any
dismantling effort . That was a drastic detour that led to the creation of a
totally different replica of Islam, fit for the poor, the restless, and the done-
wrong sects or individuals.
Politics is viewed as both "Religious Polarities & Tribal Ambition", these are all
merged as one strand in every conflict .One can hardly tell what is the actual and real
motive behind each side, because when the best cover for their tribal ambitions is
religion itself, its power compares to none, and once used as a cause, it can drive
millions to their end, most happily!!! By "Religious Polarities" I mean the right & left,
which has been the initial schism in Islam, an inevitable consequence in a society of
seniors, and degradation practiced against poor, slave-rooted and Non-Arab
constituents (Mawali). This was how the Arabs co-lived with those subordinated ones
before Islam, and it had to survive against the teachings of Islam for sure (Old Habits
Die Hard). The whole enmity between Imam Ali & Mu'awiya, is a continuation of
their ancestors competitive life, over trade of Mecca, and Syria. You will come to find
that Shiites overlook this point, they favor to regard Imam Ali as a human god, an
uncommissioned Prophet , it makes things easier for them that way, that he be an
infallible opponent to Umayyads, once agreed so, the debate is over, a saint, or earthly
god who is always right, while in Islam, there is no room or consideration for saints.
All human beings are destined to commit mistakes, even the Prophet himself, for
there are more than two 'Aayas where God blames his prophet for going astray, in
matters known to all. I have a separate editorial about this issue (Infallible Or Not?), it
is in Arabic, but I can help provide a quickie for you, in English. My editorials are
there on Scribd site (http://www.scribd.com/riadhh/documents), I have done a lot of work
proving this thing there, because it is, as I believe, the main reason why Iraqis are
barbarians and never making any progress in a real world out there.
3. None of what you read in our history is that genuine. The manipulation of texts,
and the tilted interpretation of 'Aayas according to people's own interests, and
personal/ tribal favoring had gone off the limits. Shiites pick whatever is a "praise"
and limits its circle for Ali & Fatima, even when it is a part of an 'Aaya, while each
'Aaya has a mono issue to deal with, they pick the very first part of one 'Aaya, where
God is blaming the family of the Prophet and directing them to act rationally, and
restrict it to the wives of the Prophet, then they allot the remaining part of the same
'Aaya, for Fatima and her minor family, since that part is a praising and glorifying
one !!!, alternatively, any "blame" or "threatening", any where else, is considered to
be for the rest of the Prophets protagonists !! As a reaction to that, the Umayyads did
a counter thing, they made up so many quotes, framing them to be Hadeeth of the
Prophet, contributing to glorifying their assassinated relative Caliph ,Othman, and
Muawiya too. Another faction did the same for Abu Bakr, and were called (Al
Bakriyah). This is not my own deduction, it is mentioned in the Shiites bible, Nahj Al
Balagha, the compiler of it, Ibn Abi Alhadeed, a Shiite Mu'tazili fellow admitted that
(Our folks were the first to invent false Hadeeth( =Quotes), to tease the Umayyads
who ordered that Imam Ali be cursed in all mosques, so they responded by adding
too many fake Hadeeths, to glorify Imam Ali ,and make him appear as a sacred icon,
an untouchable of his own time, a gate to heaven, his following is a must in order to
secure God's acceptance and Heavens. Actually, the main crime of the Shiite faith is
starting a chain reaction of lies and improvisations beyond any reasonable amount or
limit. The question is, whom to believe and follow? Whom to quote? How to judge all
those incidents.

Now to the main course.

I have been through these accusations and stuff like them since the year 1983, I
have debated the toughest minds of theirs . Right from the start, I can tell you that
a few of the accusations mentioned here about Aysha are true ,yet, forming no big
deal to Sunnies ,including me and my Mu'tazili mind , since I consider all of these
icons (Ali, Aysha ,Hafsa ,Omar…etc) as ordinary human beings who were made
to commit mistakes, one way or another , they could never act like Gods, no
matter how hard they might have been trying. In fact, this is the real thing about
Islam, it guards against any idea that robs Allah of his unique powers to be
infallible, omni-potent, source of (granting ,assisting, judging, forgiving,
bestowing mercy,…etc) ,and it is all about one thing in the long run, that no man
shall be acting like God, moving the multitudes as to his own preferences, and
exploiting them (which is what all those regimes & doctrines are all after,
eventually ). Aysha & Hafsa were sure to have reflected their own feelings of
jealousy in more than one instant, actually, neither their fathers, nor their mutual
husband ,tried to conceal it, Omar himself explained to one prominent Sahabi, that
it was both his daughter, and Aysha too, who were addressed by those 'Aayas
(first 2 accusations), thus, it all was not disgraceful to them, and so do we all feel,
whether Sunnies, like my colleagues who contributed to this impulse, or Mu'tazili
like my case . I 'd rather approve a few issues mentioned there, if, and only if, we
treat the sources or references mentioned as 100% true, genuine and authentic.
There is no point in picking this and skipping that, according to our own faith . A
reference is a reference, either all of it be considered true, or the opposite, i.e.
disregarding it as a whole. This is not directed to you nor to any outsider, it is to
tell you that these Rafidha(=Extremist Fanatics of Shiia) do not trust the whole
works of Imam Bukhari & Imam Muslim …etc ,as collectors, compilers and
verifiers of the Prophets quotes(Hadeeth), but they use what they pick out of those
huge archives that took a lifetime of each compiler, and a hell of an effort to check
credibility of a chain of people relaying it from generation to another, back from
the origin, the Prophet's own texts, onwards. This is a huge achievement compared
to all other religions, not necessarily 100% authentic as most Sunnie fellows push,
because the way both these scholars had followed to purify their bouquets, might
have led to dispensing with some authentic texts, due to the slightest suspicion felt
regarding one of the many men relaying the text, stuff like him turning senile later
before dying, or being not that honest in matters of life . This could be the reason
why we have that gap, the missing links, as mentioned by me .The Rafidha are
after this plot (Degrading Aysha & Hafsa specifically, since they are daughters of
Abu Bakr & Omar, rivals of Imam Ali for the cause of succeeding the Prophet as
caliphs No. 1& 2, respectively), and for the very intention of robbing Imam Ali's
rivals of any credibility, never admitting it that human beings commit such
mistakes in the least , they are called (lamam) in Quran, meaning " Slightest
Faults", and being a wife of the Prophet does not mean granting her the character
and mentality of a She-Prophet !! The same reference here, (Al Bukhari Archive
of The Prophets Quotes) contains another quote (=Hadeeth) that says, Imam Ali's
father, Abu Talib, who died refusing to convert to Islam, although aiding the
Prophet so much while confronting the Meccan leaders, it says that Abu Talib is
the least punished of Hell's residents, he is said to be in a shallow river of raging
hell, his brain just boils due to it, they do not approve of it, although it is from the
same reference used here by them while targeting Aysha. and claim that Abu
Talib had turned to Muslim in secrecy, they even made up a poem , and attributed
it to him, a poem speaking of his turning into Muslim !! This is their way of
double-dealing with Albukhari & Muslim, picking what suits their agenda , and
overlooking the rest.

In fact, all Aysha's faults mentioned here ,as well as those of the rest of wives ,are
understood by Sunnies as (meant to be), for they provided the scene that fits the
text of Quran, i.e. if Aysha & Hafsa had not been committing those faults, would
it be possible to have that very text ,'Aayas, blaming them and correcting their
acts? It is much like Adam's fault, with Eve, if he could reject Satan's seduction
and luring, was it possible for this life on Earth to be there? Aysha's mistakes have
been depicted in Quran as if a live performance, to inspire the right thing to do in
contrast to them , as a remedy or correction, which gives the teaching a touch of
reality and authenticity ,except for the major mishap of her, The Camel Incident
.This is to say, there had surely been too many mistakes by other Muslims back
then, whether women or men, including Fatima & Ali, but the Quran did not
include them, because these faults of Aysha had been subjected to a powerful
zooming tool and a searchlight thing , for the best of Muslims and all humanity, in
general , otherwise, the Prophet would have kept it to himself and never allowed it
to be declared, and avoided that hassle originally, if it were not for God to be the
only one in charge. Quran makes use of both old civilizations and religions tales,
as well as real-time and factual incidents relevant to contemporary companions ,
and this is how Sunnie Muslims view all those 'Aayas , whether amending,
blaming or warning Aysha and Hafsa, for the Prophet himself had had more than
one occasion likewise ( the blind man incident, Altahreem incident, and the
incident of allowing those who requested an excuse from joining the army), so
why not for any other Muslim? .
The Rafidha had tried their best to shake the Islamic belief for ages , targeting its
symbols. They deny any other Muslim the right to judge Imam Ali(Calling him
Nasibi for that, i.e. spiteful foe for Imam Ali and his dynasty, to justify killing him
for that), or probe his causes to kill thousands of Khawarij without a justified
reason, but they act like daredevils in matters of analyzing all acts of Sahaba and
wives of the Prophet. They have used Imam Ali and his dynasty as a spearhead to
implement their objectives. If you review their tracks in their bible, Nahj
Albalagha, you will find that Imam Ali was favoring himself to be the best
candidate to succeed the Prophet in one quote attributed to him by them, saying
that he is central to this case as is the Quttub to Alraha( center bearing and
grinding stone itself, i.e. he is central to the case ). Alternatively ,in another quote
attributed to him too, he rejects any ambition of being a ruler, simulating the
whole life delicacies and fortunes as a goat's sniff !! and even when the Muslims
asked him to succeed the assassinated Othman, he responded negatively, saying
that he is better a minister to them than a ruler !!! , now which of these
contradicting statements is right? Did he or did he not wish the hell that he be
elected? I myself am pretty sure he wished the hell to be elected, but he had the
least score of votes and supporters , he was a junior striving to take over a society
of seniors, and that got him to lose it for all those three times.

So, this is Aysha, married at an early age, and acting as a beloved young wife, and
had the extraordinary ability to memorize and keep a history that is most needed
for the far future, she was not just a wife, she was a living, talking & walking
register, and that seems to have pissed the Shiites all the time, how come she be so
evaluated more than Fatima, the Prophet's daughter, in matters of conveying the
Seera? They could not treat her right, and admit it that this is her role , a wife is
always to closer to her husband than his daughter , when it comes to privacy,
passion, intimacy and archive keeping ,it is that simple, but the Shiites are always
after a quite different agenda !There is no use trying to convince them of the
explicit cause.

The first thing that met my exploring eyes, was the degree of exaggeration and
super-sizing terms used there, at the beginning of every point, I made them in bold
& underlined letters, to help distinguish them, this act is all opposite any
apologetic explanation met here and there, defending Aysha . The editor had used
the extremist term to describe her acts, framing each act, making a felony as big as
a sin, for a toughest alternative that fits his intended objective . Her jealousy
towards the rest of wives, combined with the immature age of hers is natural
compared to other wives living within a polygamist family. This need be
understood, before diving into this issue. All families of multiple wives exhibit the
fiercest feelings of jealousy, envy, complaining, plots and conspiracies against
each other, since not only the husbands passion is to be shared, it is his wealth and
residence too, once he is dead. I am comparing these accusations to what I find
here around me, and that is why I am disliking these accusations.
The jealousy of Aysha is not hard to understand if we think of it quite logically,
and view her as a natural human being within a context of polygamy .Her husband
was Mohammad himself, a gate to heaven as understood by all Muslims " Say, [O
Muhammad], "If you should love Allah , then follow me, [so] Allah will
love you and forgive you your sins. And Allah is Forgiving and Merciful."
'Aal Imran-31, while she was a beloved young wife compared to the rest. And
she had so many wives competing with her to win his heart and favoring . She
derived her superiority from too many issues, her father's endearment by the
Prophet being the closest to him, her young age compared to the rest, she was the
only virgin married by him, and it is known that the Prophet had advised one man
in one stance, to favor a virgin wife over a widow or a divorcee . I myself
disapprove of her mocking at Khadija(The Prophet's first wife), and of Safiya
(The Ex- Jewish wife of his ) too, this is one kind of mistake that is very popular
here, now and then, and had always been so, to make fun of people for the shape
of their noses, ears, skin, body built, and origins too, she made a mistake mocking
at them, and Khadija , should not have been made any prone to such degradation,
but once again, it is sheer jealousy and immature conduct, and if the Prophet
himself had reacted angrily ,blaming her for it, what else can others be adding to
it? Is it a chain reaction? The reason why is clear, Khadija was not only the first
wife of Mohammad, she was the mother of Fatima!!!! Fatima herself , had denied
her husband the right of marrying another woman next to her . It made the prophet
feel angry after her complaint, and Ali was blamed in public, and quite severely
for that .
To me, Aysha is a rational, real thing woman with highs and lows of an oriental
woman , but never to the extremes like Shiites try to push facts to. If Aysha was
not to act with jealousy within that habitat, I myself would never have believed
her biography or her existence there even. I am after the real McCoy, not the fairy
tales and the platonic considerations .They say here( Tell the rational guy of
irrational stuff, if he approved it, then he is no rational at all)!!
I guess that the whole thing is not feeling that zealous to defend the Prophet, it is
about Imam Ali being infallible or not, him, his wife, sons and grand grand sons
too, and it is about Aysha being an ordinary human being or not , her , Hafsa, and
all other icons relevant to the schism in the first place .Once agreed upon this ,it is
not a problem digesting the acts of each of these icons and analyzing them .In fact,
there is something far more deserving than that, it is the nature of the Prophet
himself, was he an angel-like apostle, or an ordinary human being, who had
upgraded himself ethically to the extent of deserving to be the chosen one ? This
is the backbone of one editorial of mine ,( ‫ل مرتد‬ّ ‫=( ) في لزوم الرد على ك‬The Necessity
of Realiation Against Every Infidel). There, you may be astonished to see a
proposed image of the Prophet, for the first time may be .I am trying to reach the
magma, before it turns into lava.

Speaking of the Camel incident, I need to clarify that it was the actual early
schism , Muslims were divided into two congregations, one is supporters of the
newly elected Caliph by then ,Imam Ali, including those outlaws who
assassinated Othman too, and another congregation that was all provoked why
Imam Ali refused to hand over those outlaws to them, to Muawiya, or judge them
in stead, for the act they committed . She was not alone on her own, trying to get
Muslims involved in a domestic confrontation like Shiites believe, a confrontation
that no Muslim is to feel proud of, even now .Their supporters were a few
hundreds, while they speak of fifteen thousands killed from Aysha's army, in
contrast to ten thousands from Ali's army!!! My mind tells me that these numbers
are very much exaggerated, like always, because Ibn Katheer ,in his (Albidaya
Wal Nihaya), was not present there, it was all relayed from generation to
generation ,a whole 700 years duration lies between the date of the Camel Fight &
The compilation of that huge archive of Ibn Katheer, which is a register of
incidents, but never to the high standards of Hadeeth compilation by Imam
Bukhari & Imam Muslim !!! Also, she was accompanied by two of the Prophet's
protagonists (and close relatives too) , (Talha & Alzubair) who were no less than
Imam Ali himself when it comes to piety and endearment by the Prophet and all
Muslims . It was not between Aysha & Ali alone , as the Shiites wish to exhibit it
to others, it was a total dispute between people feeling the anguish and seeking to
avenge the death of the recently assassinated Caliph ( Also a son-in-law to the
Prophet, and for two consecutive times, compared to Ali), and those who were not
willing to hand those outlaws to be punished, claiming that he had been too lean,
allowing his relatives to take his role and do people wrong . Aysha explained it
later, that she rode out to help end that crucial turmoil ,convincing Ali to quench
the protestors' rage and hand them those outlaws, she did as Quran asks every
Muslim to be doing in such conflicts (the Quranic text is mentioned down below),
and she expressed her sorrow and repentance later to that, for the lives that were
lost due to clashes initiated one way or another .Imam Ali himself had expressed
the same repentance feelings ( I wish that I was dead some twenty years ago), and
talked to God that this was never his favoring for things to be so. Muslims refer to
it as (Fitna= An act of confrontation between two parties of the same folks, mostly
in chaos, and in an uncontrolled mode, where both sides go off their limits and are
both against the general rule of avoiding spiteful quarrels. It happens most of the
times due to instantaneous reactions ,reflecting extreme frenzy and sudden rage) .
Aysha's contribution in that Fitna is way off what the author had been bringing
here, claiming that Aysha had voided her teaching, to stay at home as shown in
the Quranic text brought out by him ,and highlighted in green (point 3 of his).
That 'Aaya touches a quite different issue, ordering all wives to favor staying at
home over going explicit by most women, footloose, and mixing with men in the
market streets, all dressed up and perfumed, it could never be an order to stay at
home till the end of their lives ,or quit all acts of dispute where their men,
husband, brothers, and sons too, are to risk their lives eventually. This is not Islam
,Imam Al Husain himself should have left his family, women and children back in
Medina ,as he left to Kerbala!!! And his daughter Sukaina too, was any but that
woman wrapped in black like any Persian housewife !! she had her own saloon for
poetry and arts in Egypt too, after the martyrdom of her father, relishing ideas and
humor with men and poets that were total strangers to her. One can't help but
wonder , why do Shiite scholars act so mutedly towards the late examples and
queries of mine ? Why don't they ask Alhusain's ladies and daughter to stay at
home, like they do with Aysha?? I'd rather say that the feminine image was a
totally different back then. In Badr raid against the pagan Meccans, Muslim
women were there to support their men and treat wounded Muslim warriors. In Al
Khandaq (Trench) siege, Safiya, the aunt of Mohammad, hit an infiltrating Jew
using a huge stone, and killed him .In Al Yarmook grand battle with the Romans,
Khawla Bint Alazwar and her female mates led a squad of cavalry force ,and
indulged with fighting with the heavily armored platoons of the enemy. In
Alqadisiyah grand war against the Persians, Muslim women were there, and very
actively next to men. The Shiite scholars and historians are always trying to
impose a very sick and passive interpretation of Shari'a (Islamic law), to fit their
own agenda and super impose their black sack covering Muslim women from
head to toe, and isolating them from the scene of life . Fatima herself, is claimed
through Shiite references, to have gone riding on a donkey or a mule, roaming the
streets, cursing Abu Bakr after her father died (allegedly), due to him denying her
any legacy after her father, the Shiites claim that she did so, isn't it the same scene,
on a smaller scale, quitting her house and showing off to strangers, roaming the
villages and streets, crying over a piece of land (Fadak), presumably her father's
own? This is a pure double dealing act. I myself tend to disbelieve both tales. This
is not the way of a Prophet's family.
 The story mentioned later to that, about her being assassinated (allegedly) by
Muawiya, is a sick fable that has no roots at all, not in any approved reference .
This is their way of creating a myth, I have elaborated on this point in one
editorial a few weeks ago, how they create an illusion, and how they nourish it,
and market it too. Their ideas suit the lowly class, and the immature ones. Once
they grow old, they just can't break free of it . The always- repeated stories of
torture, deprivation, teardrops, wailing, self flagellation for repentance and
sorrowful passion plays, all contribute to this sick faith that once started as a
brilliant , offensive and active opposition to the Umayyad dictatorship and anti-
Islam conducts of theirs, under the title of Alawi Party , but finally gave in , and
turned into a blend of religious quackery, clerical theology that is undisputable,
passive submission of their multitudes to their masters, fables teaching, sex
marketing under (Mut'ah coitus rituals), wife sodomy approval, and fortunes
seeking church as mean as assuring a thief to his career as long as he pays 1/5 to
the clerics !! all under the title of Shiite Sect, not to mention their hypocrisy
covered by (Tuqia) justification . What else is left of the genuine Islam ??What
has been remaining of that Alawi trend ,that had been made to turn from a militia
into a church ?

I need to draw your attention , that I had to deal with both issues here, the main
one (Grand Schism), and the current issue of Aysha, they are not just related to
each other, they are embedded one inside the other, and since the comprehensive
understanding of Quran is via correlation, one issue can never be fully understood
unless you trace all parts of the issue, here and there .This applies to some issues,
not all, and it is named (Muhkam= Clear & Decided Once 4 All) its opposite is
called (Mutashabih = Gray Zone Issues ). The average Muslim can trace his
duties according to the first category, while the intricate issues that are none of his
business, are left for the elite, needing a lateral thinking ability rather than judging
upon them through one 'Aaya . You are welcomed for any clarification,
translation, elaboration,…whatsoever.

*********************************************************************
*********************************************************************

‫ إفشاء سر النبي )صلى ال عليه وآله وسلم( لها عند تناوله العسل واتهامها له كذبًا بأن فيه رائحة مغافير‬:‫ل‬
ً ‫او‬
‫ )) وإذا أسّر النبي الى بعض أزواجه حديثًا فلما نبأت به وأظهره ال عليه عّرف بعضه‬:‫ وكما قال تعالى‬،‫الكريهة‬
.(3:‫وأعرض عن بعض فلما نبأها به قالت من أنبأك هذا قال نبأني العليم الخبير (( )التحريم‬

True, but justified by the idea that she is not a saint, not infallible too ( The red
highlight is for a tilted description, I found it the other way round , in fact, it is a
totally localized and old Arabic term, some describe it as an appealing scent, while the
guy and his likes are using it here as "disgusting' scent !!!). Aysha & Hafsa made a
mistake for sure ,this is what Sunnies believe . I myself would never approve of such
a conduct, not by Aysha, nor by the Prophet himself, it all is weird to me. There could
 have been another issue that had been lost like all those missing links, not that silly,
like two wives playing tricks with their husband, a Prophet like Mohammad !!!! I
told you that we need to double check these issues no matter how authentic they look
to the majority of Muslims, Engineer Adnan Al Rifa'i, from Syria is a keen researcher,
undertaking a great mission like this, although too many orthodox scholars criticize
him for that, but I see it all very right to do so , since they had been used for sick
intentions like done here .I tend to understand it quite differently ,it ought to be a
much more important issue other than a sip of honey and a trick by two wives against
a third one!!. This needs to be probed by us, provided that all original texts are made
. available

‫ التظاهر والتآمر والتواطؤ على رسول ال )صلى ال عليه وآله وسلم( مع حفصة بنت عمر في فرية‬:‫ثانيا‬
)) :‫ فقال عزوجل‬،‫المغافير وتهديد ال تعالى لهن تهديدًا شديدًا لم يستعمل مثله في القرآن مع أحدف من العالمين‬
‫إن تتوبا الى ال فقد صغت قلوبكما وإن تظاهرا عليه فإن ال هو موله وجبريل وصالح المؤمنين والملئكة بعد‬
.(4:‫ذلك ظهير (( )التحريم‬

True, but this is the same issue mentioned above !!!, still, both Aysha & Hafsa did not
go off the limit as claimed by the author here. The (If clause, highlighted in yellow ,
two times as in the above mentioned Quranic text) explains it, this is a conditional
threat that if they do so, they would be punished , and if they repent, then it is alright )
.Like told earlier, the guy is using a very bold paint, and reversing the text, the
threatening made, that they were to face divorce if they commit that fallacy. We know
for sure that this threat never materialized or ever came true, neither Aysha nor Hafsa
were divorced, while Lut & Noah were made to depart from their wives, for the
disobedience made by them both, this is the comparison that need be recalled.……the
.following is a quote to adopt, from Quran itself, to assist this explanation

*********************************************************************
*********************************************************************
‫ وكذلك قول النبي )صلى ال‬, (33:‫ (( )الحزاب‬...‫ )) وقرن في بيوتكن‬:‫ مخالفة أمر ال تعالى في قوله‬:‫ثالثًا‬
.(‫عليه وآله وسلم( لنسائه في حجة الوداع )هذه ثم ظهور الحصر‬
.‫( وصححه اللباني‬62 ‫ ص‬4 ‫قال عنه ابن حجر في )فتح الباري( رواه أبو داود وأحمد واسناده صحيح )ج‬
(‫ي خروج ـ وخالفت قول ال تعالى ووصية الرسول العظم )صلى ال عليه وآله وسلم‬ ّ ‫فقد خرجت عائشة ـ وأ‬
‫ وقد قال النبي )صلى ال‬،‫فبرزت في ساحات القتال بين الف المسلمين خارجة على إمام زمانها مفارقة الجماعة‬
.‫ )من فارق الجماعة شبرًا فمات مات ميتة جاهلية( رواه البخاري‬:(‫عليه وآله وسلم‬
‫ )من خلع يدًا من طاعة لقي ال يوم القيامة ول حجة له ومن مات وليس في‬:(‫وقوله )صلى ال عليه وآله وسلم‬
.‫عنقه بيعة مات ميتة جاهلية( رواه مسلم‬
:‫ ان عائشة قالت إن النبي )صلى ال عليه وآله وسلم( قال لنا ذات يوم‬:(45 ‫ ص‬12 ‫وقال ابن حجر في )فتحه ج‬
‫ وأخرج هذا أحمد وأبو يعلى والبزار وصححه ابن حبان والحاكم‬،(‫)كيف بإحداكن تنبح عليها كلب الحوأب‬
:‫ ان رسول ال )صلى ال عليه وآله وسلم( قال لنسائه‬:‫ وعند أحمد عن ابن عباس قال‬.‫وسنده على شرط الصحيح‬
‫)أيتكن صاحبة الجمل الدبب تخرج حتى تنبحها كلب الحوأب يقتل عن يمينها وعن شمالها قتلى كثيرة وتنجوا‬
‫( عن النبي‬208 ‫ ص‬8 ‫ وأخرج ابن سعد في طبقاته )ج‬.‫ وهذا رواه البزار ورجاله ثقات‬. (‫من بعد ما كادت‬
‫ )أيكن اتقت ال ولم تأت بفاحشة مبينة ولزمت ظهر حصيرها فهي‬:‫)صلى ال عليه وآله وسلم( أنه قال لنسائه‬
.(‫زوجتي في الخرة‬

This is not true. This quote(Hadeeth) is classified as (Weak) according to Sunnie

scholars( Those scholars were very precise as to what this weakness means, the
narrator missed credibility being known as a liar, try seeing the blue text below this
paragraph, it refers to where this classification was mentioned, which references and
which scholars too. The 'Aaya orders all wives and family affiliates, and all Muslim
women thereafter, to favor staying at home over roaming the streets while showing
themselves to strangers, it is not about forbidding them from joining any war or fight.
She was accompanied by her sister's son, Abdullah Bin Alzubair, a legitimate
companion, Mahram, as in Shari'a, she was a reference for Muslims since she
conveyed some 1/4 of the Prophet's tradition and life style, so she is said to have
viewed her responsibility in trying to mend any dispute between Muslims, as given in
Quran, this turned into an armed congregation, and the random arrows shot led to a
fight eventually, as known to us. Picking only the first part yields what is not what
Islam wishes women to be, desperate housewives, and forever!! . While Mohammad
was preaching from Friday to Friday , women used to state out their opposition or
inquiries, another woman was there asking him how come most 'Aayas be addressing
male Muslims, does it mean that women are not included? Women were present every
where. He even allowed one woman who was recently widowed by then, to go on
picking her palm tree dates, she was supposed to stay at home and never show out in
front of any male fellow(Idda ritual) , for months , but once asking for permission,
she was excluded out of that ban. Staying at home is meant for those divorcees and
newly widowed wives, for a short while only, until any suspected pregnancy is well
detected and diagnosed, to better attribute the fetus, if any , to his true father.

When Aysha confronted Imam Ali, she marched for the welfare of all Muslims, like
Alhusain claimed himself to be doing, when he marched with a bunch of 70
weaklings, was he really trying to deter and force an Umayyad super army, to hand
him the throne and kiss him goodbye ??!! Her move is far more positive, original,
genuine and logical than Alhusain's. She marched against a disputed Caliph , who was
accused of letting his predecessor down , his elder son, Alhasan, blamed him fiercely
for that fatal mistake, I have included that text of that stance at the end of this paper ,
and it is amazing how angry Alhasan seems to be , for the fatal fault of his father, who
seems to be very embarrassed while replying. Alhasan reminds his father that he had
asked him to quit things for a whole year, after which all Muslims including Alzubair
would turn back and elect him most willingly since they were all against his election,
and he reminded him that he asked him to refrain from the blood of Othman ,leaving
his killers to face their fate rightfully. Imam Ali replies in the saddest words
imaginable, that he wished to save Othman, and I myself feel very depressed to read
his words, he faced a very intriguing Fitna, and could not refrain from it, that is why
he kept envying those who refused to take part in it (Text brought at the end too) .

However, I sense a retarded Persian perspective in most tackling here, they are
judging Aysha as if living their own times and place, and state of mind too !! In fact,
another wife of the Prophet's ,Um Salamah, was there in Badr fight, one of the most
decisive battles that was won by Muslims against a three folds pagan army.

The tale is weak, one narrator, Mohammad Bin Omar Alwaqidy was accused of
being a liar, and not creditable , his incredibility was mentioned in the following
references:
Tahtheeb Alkamal for Almazzi, Part 26, Page 180/182
Altareekh Alkabeer for Albukhari, Part (I), Page 178
 ‫‪Altareekh Alsagheer for Albukhari, Part(II),Page 283‬‬
‫‪Dhu'afa' Al Ukaili, No. 1666‬‬
‫‪Al Dhu'afa' & Al Matrukoon for Al Nisa'I, Page 233,‬‬
‫ضعفه غير واحد من علماء الجرح‬
‫في سندها محمد بن عمر الواقدي متهم بالكذب وموصوف بأنه غير ثقة وقد ّ‬
‫والتعديل‬
‫وورد تضعيفه في‬
‫تهذيب الكمال للمزي ج ‪ 26‬صفحة ‪180/182‬‬
‫التاريخ الكبير للبخاري ج ‪ \ 1‬صفحة ‪178‬‬
‫التاريخ الصغير للبخاري ج ‪ \ 2‬صفحة ‪283‬‬
‫وورد تضعيفه ايضا في ضعفاء العقيلي رقم ‪1666‬‬
‫‪:‬الضعفاء والمتروكون للنسائي صفحة ‪ 233‬ترجمة ‪531‬‬

‫‪These are the Quranic texts('Aayas) ordering Muslims, to do their part and try to‬‬
‫‪avoid any fighting between the rest of Muslims. That was Aysha's own defense , why‬‬
‫‪she rode out in the first place :‬‬

‫}ل خير في كثير من نجواهم إل من أمر بصدقة أو معروف أو إصلح بين الناس{‬
‫}وإن طائفتان من المؤمنين اقتتلوا فأصلحوا بينهما{‬

‫‪This is the 'Aaya asking her and her fellow mates, to preach what they had been‬‬
‫‪knowing as a wives of the Prophet‬‬

‫) واذكرن ما يتلى في بيوتكن من آيات ال و الحكمة(‬

‫‪These are some excerpts from Sunni scholars at those times, explaining how the‬‬
‫‪congregation and demonstrations turned into fighting, although managing to reach‬‬
‫‪agreement before that, the useful gist of it is that those outlaws within Ali's army, who‬‬
‫‪were supposed to be handed for punishment ,provoked Aysha's soldiers thru berserk‬‬
‫‪shooting, and a fight was made to abort the agreement that was to let them face their‬‬
‫‪fate next day.‬‬

‫‪:‬يقول الباقلني‬
‫وقال جلة من أهل العلم إن الوقعة بالبصرة بينهم كانت على غير عزيمة على الحرب بل فجأة‪ ،‬وعلى سبيل دفع «‬
‫كل واحد من الفريقين عن أنفسهم لظنه أن الفريق الخر قد غدر به‪ ،‬لن المر كان قد انتظم بينهم وتم الصلح‬
‫والتفرق على الرضا‪ ،‬فخاف قتلة عثمان من التمكن منهم والحاطة بهم ‪ ،‬فاجتمعوا وتشاوروا واختلفوا‪ ،‬ثم اتفقت‬
‫أراؤهم على أن يفترقوا ويبدؤوا بالحرب سحرة في العسكرين ‪ ،‬ويختلطوا ويصيح الفريق الذي في عسكر علي‪:‬‬
‫غدر طلحة والزبير‪ ،‬ويصيح الفريق الخر الذي في عسكر طلحة والزبير‪ :‬غدر علي‪ ،‬فتم لهم ذلك على ما‬
‫دبروه‪ ،‬ونشبت الحرب‪ ،‬فكان كل فريق منهم مدافعًا لمكروه عن نفسه‪ ،‬ومانعًا من الشاطة بدمه‪ ،‬وهذا صواب من‬
‫الفريقين وطاعة ل تعالى إذا وقع‪ ،‬والمتناع منهم على هذا السبيل‪ ،‬فهذا هو الصحيح المشهور‪ ،‬وإليه نميل وبه‬
‫)نقول«‪1).‬‬

‫‪:‬ويقول ابن العربي‬

‫وقدم علي البصرة وتدانوا ليتراؤوا‪ ،‬فلم يتركهم أصحاب الهواء‪ ،‬وبادروا بإراقة الدماء‪ ،‬واشتجر بينهم «‬
‫الحرب‪ ،‬وكثرت الغوغاء على البغواء‪ ،‬كل ذلك حتى ليقع برهان‪ ،‬ول تقف الحال على بيان‪ ،‬ويخفى قتلة عثمان‪،‬‬
‫)وإن واحدًا في الجيش يفسد تدبيره فكيف بألف«‪2).‬‬
‫______________________________‬
‫‪.‬التمهيد في الرد على الملحدة ص ‪(1) 233‬‬
‫‪.‬العواصم من القواصم ص ‪(2) 159‬‬
 ‫ويقول ابن حزم‬:
« ‫ ومن كان معهم فما أبطلوا قط إمامة علي ول طعنوا‬- ‫ رضي ال عنهم‬- ‫وأما أم المؤمنين والزبير وطلحة‬
‫ فقد صح صحة ضرورية ل إشكال فيها أنهم لم يمضوا إلى البصرة لحرب علي ول خلفًا عليه ول نقضًا‬...‫فيها‬
‫ فلما كان الليل عرف قتلة عثمان أن الراغة والتدبير‬،‫ وبرهان ذلك أنهم اجتمعوا ولم يقتتلوا ول تحاربوا‬... ‫لبيعته‬
،‫عوا حتى خالطوا عسكر علي‬ ُ ‫ وبذلوا السيف فيهم فدفع القوم عن أنفسهم فُرِد‬،‫ فبيتوا عسكر طلحة والزبير‬،‫عليهم‬
‫ فاختلط المر اختلطًا لم يقدر أحد‬،‫ وكل طائفة تظن ول تشك أن الخرى بدأتها بالقتال‬،‫فدفع أهله عن أنفسهم‬
1).«‫ لعنهم ال ل يفترون من شب الحرب وإضرامها‬،‫ والفسقة من قتلة عثمان‬،‫)على أكثر من الدفاع عن نفسه‬

‫ويقول ابن كثير واصفًا الليلة التي اصطلح فيها الفريقان من الصحابة‬:
«‫ وأجمعوا على أن يثيروا الحرب من‬،‫ وباتوا يتشاورون‬،‫ وبات قتلة عثمان بشر ليلة‬،‫وبات الناس بخير ليلة‬
2).«‫)الغلس‬
______________________________
(1) 239-4/238 ‫الفصل في الملل والهواء والنحل‬.
(2) 7/5 ‫البداية والنهاية‬.

*********************************************************************
*********************************************************************

:(61 ‫ ص‬2 ‫ فهي تقول كما رواه البخاري )ج‬،‫ عدم احترامها للنبي )صلى ال عليه وآله وسلم( وللصلة‬:‫رابعًا‬
.(‫)كنت أمّد رجلي في قبلة النبي )صلى ال عليه وآله وسلم( فإذا سجد غمزني فرفعتها فإذا قام مددتها‬

This is another twisting of facts, omitting the remaining part of it. Her bedroom was
known to be small as mentioned in Hadeeth references ,and the whole thing is about
telling us that there is no problem praying while a living figure is in the way and
direction or Qiblah( Ka'ba direction). Her importance for the whole Shari'a is that she
reflected what the domestic Prophet was like, and memorized it to relay to us and all.
The timid facet of the Arab Muslim society , is concerned with a paragon to follow,
this had always been the case with my folks, like Anthony Nutting said in his book
(Arabs),something like, these people expressed their best image when a brilliant
leader was there to lead them. The stuff she relayed about how to approach each other
while fasting, or during menstruation, and the way he used to make fun with his
family , or tease his wives and solve their disputes originating from jealousy,( like the
incident of breaking a dish sent to him by another wife other than the one he was
spending that day with), or how she would express her anger and jealousy, calling him
(You who claim to be a prophet!!), while when in harmony, she would call him (O'
God's Prophet), these quotes are an image of a life long forgotten unless it were for
her to keep and relay, we smile while reading or preaching them to our families and
kids for he himself used to receive those instants with a laughing face. Mohammad
was a natural human being, who would be experiencing something like seizures
whenever Gabriel was contacting him, otherwise , he led a normal life, with details of
him washing the dishes, and teaching us that the best of men is the best for his family.
Actually, I find that the bizarre relations of the Shiite societies, are due to them
abandoning Mohammad's teachings while acting like a natural man, they did not
accept him as a casual man, nor his wives. They sought their paragon in Ali, having
decorated him as a shining star, that is hard to accept by any rational guy. They could
‫‪not depict Imam Ali, not as a brave warrior, lateral thinker, humble cleric, articulated‬‬
‫‪poet, or an extremely pious scholar, in stead of that, they treated him as a very remote‬‬
‫‪idol, one that is very hard to imitate and follow .‬‬

‫‪The following attribution raises an interesting thing, even the main Shiite scholars, as‬‬
‫‪given below, adopt this incident of Aysha to explain how to pray (for women) next to‬‬
‫‪men, they had quoted Aysha's text as an approval, the guy is Shiite and named Al‬‬
‫‪Hurr Al 'Aamili, followed later by Al Bahrani, Al Tabataba'i, and the late Alkhoei.‬‬

‫كما في كتاب من ل يحضره الفقيه للحّر العاملي ص ‪,64 - 62‬حديث محاذاة المرأة‬
‫سلم انه قال ل بأس بأن تصلي المرأة بحذاء الرجل و هو يصلى فإن النبي‬
‫ل عليه ال ّ‬
‫روى جميل عن ابى عبد ا ّ‬
‫ل عليه و آله كان يصلى و عائشة مضطجعة بين يديه و هي حائض و كان إذا أراد ان يسجد غمز رجليها‬ ‫صلى ا ّ‬
‫فرفعت حتى يسجد‪.‬‬

‫واستدل بذلك ايضًا البحراني والطباطبائي والخوئي في المسائل الفقهّية الخاصة بالصلة‬

‫*********************************************************************‬
‫*********************************************************************‬

‫خامسًا‪ :‬عدم احترام النبي العظم )صلى ال عليه وآله وسلم( بل تشكك بنبوته )صلى ال عليه وآله وسلم(‬
‫وتحتمل كذبه )صلى ال عليه وآله وسلم( وحاشاه‪ :‬فكانت إذا غاضبته قالت له‪)) :‬أنت الذي تزعم أنك نبي((!!‬
‫وأيضًا قالت له‪)) :‬تكلم ول تقل إل حقًا((!! وقولها له )صلى ال عليه وآله وسلم(‪)) :‬أقصد(( ‪ -‬أي اعدل ‪ -‬فلطمها‬
‫أبو بكر فسال الدم على ثوبها‪.‬‬
‫وكانت ترفع صوتها وترادد النبي )صلى ال عليه وآله وسلم( وتراجعه بل وتهجره اليوم الى الليل كما تفعل‬
‫ن حزبين‬‫ن نساء النبي )صلى ال عليه وآله وسلم( ك ّ‬
‫زميلتها وحزبها‪ .‬فقد أخرج البخاري عنها بأنها قالت‪ )) :‬إ ّ‬
‫فحزب فيه عائشة وحفصة وصفية وسودة والحزب الخر أم سلمة وسائر نساء النبي )صلى ال عليه وآله‬
‫وسلم( ((‪.‬‬

‫‪The Quote is classified as ( WEAK)!!!,Alhafidh Alhaithamy pointed at one of the‬‬

‫)‪links ,Mohammad Bin Isaac, said he was a forger, (Ref. Mujamma' Alzawa'd, 322/4‬‬
‫‪…this is in Arabic too:‬‬

‫‪#‬الحديث ضعيف‪ .‬قال الحافظ الهيثمي » فيه محمد بن إسحاق وهو مدلس وقد عنعنه« )مجمع الزوائد ‪.(4/322‬‬

‫*********************************************************************‬
‫*********************************************************************‬

‫ن حزبين فحزب فيه عائشة‬ ‫ن نساء النبي )صلى ال عليه وآله وسلم( ك ّ‬
‫فقد أخرج البخاري عنها بأنها قالت‪ )) :‬إ ّ‬
‫وحفصة وصفية وسودة والحزب الخر أم سلمة وسائر نساء النبي )صلى ال عليه وآله وسلم( ((‪.‬‬
This incident is mentioned as a whole episode, not(picked), like given here by the
author. Viewing the original text , you come to understand the following: Some
Muslims used to choose the same day when it is Aysha's turn to be hosting the
Prophet, to offer their gifts to the Prophet. The rest of the wives(having been made in
two syndicates) felt annoyed to it, and urged some wives, Um Salamah & Zainab Bint
Jahsh, and his daughter Fatima too, to tell the Prophet to ask Muslims to avoid
picking that day or another, but the Prophet declined, most mutedly. The thing to
notice here, is that Zainab used a harsh and offensive way to refer to Aysha, saying
(Bint Ibn Abi Quhafa's daughter= daughter of the son of Abu Quhafa), avoiding to
mention her father's name in specific, as a further degradation, this is understood to be
a humiliation, no matter how jealous she looks, and that was why the Prophet himself
acknowledged Zainab of it by then , saying (She is Abu Bakr's daughter )!!

Alternatively, In his reply to Fatima( And to Um Salamah too), he requested her to

quit it, saying that Aysha is the only wife that Archangel Gabriel would be present to
reveal things to him while in her presence, unlike others, and asked his daughter
( Don't You Love What Your Father Loves?), she approved it , and that was the end
of that story. She refused to resume that talk after that, no matter how much the rest of
wives asked her to.

It also seems that the author had resorted to the only trick available to him, picking
the first part of the story, just to show that Aysha & Hafsa were in one syndicate,
opposing the rest, and this a typical thing to come across in every polygamy, as I am
certain. The life of the Prophet was a hard one, he was not wealthy, could not find any
meat to eat, for months. His wife used to say that they could not light any cooking fire
for several days. Such a life pattern was sure to provoke all disputes between his
wives, and that is why it was mentioned in Quran, that their reward is in the afterlife,
not this one, and if they choose to complain, they'd better be divorced, they all chose
to agree and quit. This is the real thing ,in Arabic:

:‫لو لم يبتر الرواية لتبّين أن الرواية تتحّدث عن فضل عائشة وحب النبي لها‬

‫ فحزب فيه عائشة وحفصة‬: ‫ن حزبين‬ ّ ‫عن عائشة رضي ال عنها أن نساء رسول ال صلى ال عليه وسلم ُك‬
‫ وكان المسلمون قد‬، ‫ والحزب الخر أم سلمة وسائر نساء رسول ال صلى ال عليه وسلم‬، ‫وصفية وسودة‬
‫ فإذا كانت عند أحدهم هدية يريد أن يهديها إلى رسول ال‬، ‫علموا حب رسول ال صلى ال عليه وسلم عائشة‬
‫ حتى إذا كان رسول ال صلى ال عليه وسلم في بيت عائشة بعث صاحب الهدية إلى‬، ‫خرها‬ ّ ‫صلى ال عليه وسلم أ‬
. ‫رسول ال صلى ال عليه وسلم في بيت عائشة‬

‫ من أراد أن يهدي إلى‬: ‫ كلمي رسول ال صلى ال عليه وسلم يكلم الناس فيقول‬: ‫سلمه فقلن لها‬ َ ‫فكّلم حزب أم‬
‫ فلم يقل لها شيئًا‬، ‫ فكلمته أم سلمة بما قلن‬، ‫رسول ال صلى ال عليه وسلم هدية فليهدها حيث كان من بيوت نسائه‬
. ‫ فلم يقل لها شيئًا‬، ‫ فكلمته حين دار إليها أيضًا‬: ‫ قالت‬، ‫ فكلميه‬: ‫ فقلن لها‬، ‫ ما قال لي شيئًا‬: ‫ فسألنها فقالت‬،
‫ ل تؤذيني في‬: ‫ فقال لها‬، ‫ فدار إليها فكلمته‬. ‫ كلميه حتى يكلمك‬: ‫ فقلن لها‬. ‫ ما قال لي شيئًا‬: ‫فسألنها فقالت‬
‫ ثم إنهن‬. ‫ أتوب إلى ال من أذاك يا رسول ال‬: ‫ قالت‬. ‫ فإن الوحي لم يأتني وأنا في ثوب امرأة إل عائشة‬، ‫عائشة‬
‫ إن نساءك‬: ‫دعون فاطمة بنت رسول ال صلى ال عليه وسلم فأرسلت إلى رسول ال صلى ال عليه وسلم تقول‬
‫ فرجعت إليهن فأخبرتهن‬. ‫ بلى‬: ‫ يا بنية أل تحبين ما أحب ؟ قالت‬: ‫ فقال‬، ‫ فكلمته‬. ‫ينشدنك العدل في بنت أبي بكر‬
‫ إن نساءك ينشدنك ال‬: ‫ فأتته فأغلظت وقالت‬، ‫ فأرسلن زينب بنت جحش‬. ‫ فأبت أن ترجع‬، ‫ ارجعي إليه‬: ‫ فقلن‬،
‫ حتى إن رسول ال‬، ‫ فرفعت صوتها حتى تناولت عائشة – وهي قاعدة – فسبتها‬، ‫العدل في بنت ابن أبي قحافة‬
‫ قالت النبي‬. ‫ فتكلمت عائشة ترد على زينب حتى أسكتتها‬: ‫صلى ال عليه وسلم لينظر إلى عائشة هل تكلم ؟ قال‬
.. ‫ )) إنها بنت أبي بكر (( رواه البخاري‬: ‫صلى ال عليه وسلم إلى عائشة وقال‬
*********************************************************************
*********************************************************************

‫ غيرتها الشديدة وتجاوزها على سائر نساء النبي )صلى ال عليه وآله وسلم( كالسيدة الكاملة خديجة‬:‫سادسًا‬
‫ ان عائشة كانت تغار من نساء النبي )صلى ال‬:‫ قال ابن حجر في فتحه‬.‫)رض( وكذلك صفية وسودة وغيرهن‬
.‫عليه وآله وسلم( لكن كانت تغار من خديجة أكثر‬
‫ ))استأذنت هالة بنت خويلد أخت خديجة على رسول ال )صلى ال‬:‫فقد روى البخاري ومسلم عن عائشة قالت‬
‫ ما تذكر من عجوز من‬:‫ فغرت فقلت‬:‫عليه وآله وسلم( فعرف استئذان خديجة فارتاع فقال )اللهم هالة( قالت‬
‫ والبخاري كعادته في قطع الحاديث التي‬.((‫عجائز قريش حمراء الشدقين هلكت في الدهر قد أبدلك ال خيرًا منها‬
‫تمس سلفه الصالح لم يذكر جواب النبي )صلى ال عليه وآله وسلم( لها مع وضوح نقصانه ووجوب الرد على‬
!‫مثل هكذا كلم‬
‫ ))فتغير وجه النبي )صلى ال عليه وآله وسلم( تغيرًا لم أره تغير عند شيء قط إل عند نزول‬: ‫ولكن قال أحمد‬
‫ وهذا إسناد‬:(‫ قال ابن كثير في )البداية والنهاية‬،((...‫ وفي رواية اخرى لحمد ))فتمعر وجهه تمعرًا‬،((...‫الوحي‬
‫ ))كان النبي )صلى ال‬:‫ وقال المام أحمد أيضًا عن عائشة قالت‬:‫ واضاف ابن كثير بعد هذين الحديثين‬.‫صحيح‬
‫ ما أكثر ما تذكرها حمراء‬:‫ فقلت‬،‫ فغرت يومًا‬:‫ قالت‬،‫عليه وآله وسلم( إذا ذكر خديجة أثنى عليها بأحسن الثناء‬
‫ )ما ابدلني ال خيرًا منها وقد آمنت بي إذ كفر‬:(‫ فقال )صلى ال عليه وآله وسلم‬،‫الشدقين قد أبدلك ال خيرًا منها‬
،(‫بي الناس وصدقتني إذ كذبني الناس وآستني بمالها إذ حرمني الناس ورزقني ال ولدها إذ حرمني أولد النساء‬
.‫ تفرد به أحمد أيضًا واسناده ل بأس به‬:‫وقال ابن كثير‬
‫ قلت يا رسول ال إن صفية امرأة‬:‫وأما مع صفية )رض( زوج النبي )صلى ال عليه وآله وسلم( فقالت عائشة‬
‫ رواه‬.‫ إغتبتيها‬:‫ وفي رواية‬،‫ لقد مزجت بكلمة لو مزج بها ماء البحر لمزجته‬:‫ فقال‬،‫وقال بيده كأنه يعني قصيرة‬
‫ قلت للنبي )صلى ال عليه وآله وسلم( حسبك من صفية‬:‫ وفي رواية المشكاة‬،‫أحمد والترمذي وأبو داود وغيرهم‬
.‫ تعني قصيرة‬،‫كذا وكذا‬
‫ودمتم في رعاية ال‬

True, but it still is sheer jealousy , in a society where females express the fiercest
facets of it, up till now . Actually, my own wife shows more jealous acts than these !!!
I don't feel happy or comfortable for that, and sometimes it drives me mad, with her
having tried to commit suicide because of it, but like said by the Prophet himself,
women had been created from a curved rib, so enjoy your life with them, and never
try to correct them . Still, the significance of this incident is never to be overlooked,
anyhow. The act of calling names at others, stuff like "one- eyed, cross-eyed,
hunchback, big nose, shorty, skinny, storky ,nigger,…etc" is very much denounced in
Islam( Not even as the formal description goes, since it hurts the one meant), same as
gossips too, Islam considers it a great sin to traffick gossips ,and calls it (Gheeba) .
Aysha, while acting as a jealous wife, committed that fallacy of mimicking at Safiya,
humiliating her for being short ( It was both Gheeba and names calling), and no
Sunnie Muslim can defend her act or justify it . The Prophet warned her of it , that
such a tiny disgracing or degrading description as understood by her, is very much
denounced by God Himself and could be as a whole pollution for a whole sea.. This
is what we consider here ,the lesson learnt, it was her first time as understood . If it
were ever repeated by Aysha later to that , it could have been a sin by then, but as
long as it was mentioned once and for ever, it matters none. There is always a first
time, for every thing, and by every one, this is my understanding of it , and to
compare it with Imam Ali, opting to name his sons(three of them, consecutively) as
Harb(= War ), while the Prophet chooses another each time (Hasan,Husain &
Muhassan) , simulating the titles of the sons of Aaron, Moses' brother. It is not in the
interest of Imam Ali , choosing such a name that is against " peace" , nor repeating the
same wish, opposite to the Prophet's favoring ! This is another fault for imam Ali too.
Islam stresses it that all people are to commit mistakes(whether minor or major), the
point is to repent, quit, and indemnify.
The main concern here is that those Rafidha provoke Sunnie counter-fellows, like my
case (I am Mu'tazili, but my roots are Sunnie) to contact Imam Ali as if in a
scandalous mode , although he is much revered by Sunnies . The main concern of any
rational Muslim is to defend his religion and its icons against outsiders( Sculptures
Folks, Atheists, Skeptics, ..etc), while what matters most to any Rafidhie is to weigh
all Muslim icons, with regards to Imam Ali and his family, whereas it is a forbidden
thing to do, since it is left to God, and no one other than Him, as in Holy Quran. They
do believe that he is (Hujjatullah), i.e. he is used as a standard human being, and every
time one of us is to defend himself in front of God, on Judgment Day, with alibis like
that his lust and passion for women, money , wealth and power got him to fall for it
and do others wrong through stealing, hating, envying , exploiting…etc, then, Imam
Ali is to appear, much like on a hydraulically-operated pedestal !! , may be, and God,
would be asking that poor fellow,( as they claim):" And what about this man ,you
liar ? Didn't he manage to overcome his motives and lusts while he is a human being
like your case ??". Their hypothesis misses too many facts of course , that he was
infallible (according to their allegation, not mine at all ), so how come one casual guy
be compared with an infallible one? And he had more than six female mistresses ,in
addition to his wives, why resort for fornication then when he could quench his thirst
any time, and at a high diversity like that ? And he enjoyed 1/5 of all fortunes, war
lootings, & trade income, he did not need to work to earn his living, whence cometh
his faults then? In deed, their whole belief is very unstable , I tend to call it as a
(WINDOWS 200H Edition), not suitable for any rational guy.

*********************************************************************
*********************************************************************

‫كيف ماتت عائشه؟‬

‫ومن هو السبب في موتها؟‬

‫واين دفنت ومتى دفنت في اي وقت ؟‬

‫الى كل الذين ليعرفون الجابه على السئله‬
. ‫ سبحان ال‬, ‫ول يعرفون ان الذي قتلها هو معاويه ابن ابي سفيان‬

, ‫صحيح شي غريب ليدخل العقل وربما يكون بمثابة صدمه قويه للخوه هذا الخبر‬

:‫عمومآ نحصل على الجواب من السطر التي سوف اذكرها مع ذكر المصادر‬

-----------------------------------

‫في زيارة معاويه للمدينه لخذ البيعه لبنه يزيد عارضه الكثير من الصحابه لفسق يزيد وجهله وعندما قرر‬
‫معاويه النتقام منهم بالخصوص من قتلة عثمان بن عفان فأمر بقتل عبدالرحمن بن ابي بكر واخته عائشه بنت‬
.‫ وقد قتل الثنين غيلة‬.‫ابي بكر‬
 ‫إذ قتل عبدالرحمن بالسم وقيل بدفنه حيآ‪ ,‬وقد يكون معاويه قد استخدم الوسيلتين معآ أي سمآ ودفنه حيآ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ ....(1‬البدايه والنهايه ‪,‬ابن كثير ‪ ,8/123‬المستدرك الحاكم ‪3/476‬‬

‫‪------------------------------------------------‬‬

‫وقتل معاويه عائشه بحفر بئر لها وغطى فتحة ذالك البئر عن النظار )‪(1‬‬
‫‪....‬كتاب حبيب السير ‪,‬غياث الدين بن همام الدين الحسيني ص ‪425‬‬
‫‪------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫وكانت عائشه قد ثارت على معاويه لقتله أخيهآ عبدالرحمن وتخاصمت علنآ مع مروان ابن الحكم والي معاويه‬
‫على المدينه فالحقها معاويه بأخويها عبدالرحمن ومحمد في سنة ‪ 58‬هجريه‬

‫وكانت العداوة بينها وبين بني اميه قد بلغت ذروتها ‪ .‬لكنهم اضعفوها بقتلهم لبي بكر وابنيه محمد وعبدالرحمن‬
‫وطلحه‪.‬‬
‫وقال ابن كثير في البدايه والنهايه بأن عائشه وعبدالرحمن بن ابي بكر ماتا في سنة واحدة )‬
‫‪ ..........................(1‬البدايه ‪8/96‬‬
‫وماتت عائشه وعمرها ‪ 67‬سنة‬

‫‪------------------------------------------------‬‬

‫وقال صاحب المصالت ‪ :‬كان )معاويه( على المنبر يأخذ البيعه ليزيد )في المدينه( فقالت عائشه هل استدعى‬
‫الشيوخ لبنيهم البيعة ‪ ,‬أي هل أوصي ابو بكر وعمر لبنائهم‪.‬‬

‫قال ‪ :‬ل‬

‫قالت فبمن تقتدي ؟؟‬

‫فخجل )معاويه( وهيأ لها حفرة فوقعت فيها وماتت‬

‫فقال عبدال بن الزبير يعرض بمعاويه‬

‫لقد ذهب الحمار بأم عمرو‬

‫فل رجعت ول رجع الحمار‬

‫)‪.................. (1‬الصراط المستقيم ‪ /3‬باب ‪12/46‬‬

‫‪------------------------------------------------‬‬

‫وللتغطيه على اغتيالها اشاع المويون بانها أمرت ان تدفن ليل فدفنوها ليل مثلما دفنو أباها !‬
‫)‪ ......................(1‬تهذيب الكمال ‪ , 235/ 35‬الطبقات الكبرى ‪8/77‬‬

‫‪This is all absurd , not just untrue!!! No citation, no reference ever, even the poem is‬‬
‫‪of the Abbasid era, more than a century later, composed by the Mu'tazili Aljahidh, in‬‬
‫‪a tale about most teachers being naïve and morons !!! It is a very funny story, and has‬‬
‫!!‪nothing to do with Aysha‬‬

‫‪Add-On's:‬‬
These are some more texts relevant to this issue .They had been raised by Yasir
Alhabeeb and others too

1. That one prominent Sahabi, and a keen follower too, of Imam Ali's ,
Ammar Bin Yasir , had once blamed one of his army soldiers , forswearing at
Aysha :

" I swear to God, she is your prophet's wife,both in this life and in his afterlife too,
but God has made it a test for you thru her, to see whether you obey his prophet,
or his prophet's wife"

‫ ولكن ال تبارك وتعالى ابتلكم بها ليعلم‬،‫" وال إنها لزوجة نبيكم في الدنيا والخرة‬
. "‫إياه تطيعون أم هي‬
This track had been used by both sides, once to put an emphasis on her eternal
relation with the Prophet, even in the after life(Sunnie adoption of course), and
another to support the position of Shiites, that God favors not following her !!

The thing to say here, (supposing this is a genuine thing, having really been said by
Ammar Bin Yasir) is: What was his tool in knowing God's choice ? How can one be
so sure, and swear it to God, speaking on behalf of Him? Once the Prophet was dead,
there were no more revelations from Archangel Gabriel, no more Quran texts to clear
things and show what was the point of view of the Deity, so how come he attribute it
to the Deity? This is very dangerous in fact and is far epidemic than just this track by
this Sahabi alone, to miss to say (I believe that..)or (In My Opinion..)or ( I Think
That..). A great Sahabi like Ammar, one that is very much revered by Sunnies and
Shiites , had always been treated like a saint, by average people, they have been
mistaken him to be always right, since he was so close to the Prophet, and his
parents ,Yasir & Sumayya, were the first martyrs in Islam, but does his quotes
represent a further Sunna or mandatory teaching? The Fitna, or schism itself, got all
Muslim to be intrigued, how come two very much revered Sahabies stand fighting
each other? In this very quote, he should have proceeded it with (As I Believe), and
the fact that most Sahabies were taking sides against each other, means that they had
chosen different routes of life to follow, something that has got nothing to do with
religion, or the their attitudes towards Islam.

2. Another track used by them, is the following one, where the prophet is
said to have pointed to his east side by then, saying ( It Is From Here That The
Fitna Would Approach You, Where The Devil's Horn Rises):

‫ من حيث يطلع قرن الشيطان‬، ‫أل أن الفتنة هاهنا‬

Notice how they have covered for their Iranian side , by claiming that

Aysha's room was to his east side, so he was meaning her!!

 3. The following text proves that she advised Abdallah Bin Badeel Bin Warqa'
Alkhuza'I to elect Imam Ali, a proof of reasonable acceptance, in the least :

‫ أن عبد ال بن بديل بن ورقاء‬، ‫كما أخرج أخرج ابن أبي شيبة‬ -

‫ إلزم علّيا‬: ‫ من يبايع ؟ فقالت له‬، ‫ سأل عائشة‬، ‫الخزاعي‬

4. The following text is for her telling Shuraih Bin Hani' to seek a reply from
Imam Ali, since he used to travel a lot with the Prophet, and can tell him how to wipe
his feet during Wuthoo':

‫ عليك بابن‬: ‫ قالت له‬، ‫[ عن المسح على الخّفين‬13] ‫عندما سألها شريح بن هانىء‬
‫أبي طالب فسله فإنه كان يسافر مع رسول ال صلى ال عليه وسلم‬

5. This is for Imam Ali repenting for the killing if Talha, in the Camel incident,
wishing that he was long dead, some twenty years before that:

‫ " لما قتل طلحة ورآه‬: ‫ يقول عنه الشعبي‬، ‫وهذا أمير المؤمنين علي بن أبي طالب‬
‫ عزيز علي أبا محمد أن أراك‬: ‫ ويقول‬، ‫ جعل يمسح التراب عن وجهه‬، ‫علي مقتول‬
‫ أي‬- . ‫" إلى ال أشكو عجزي وبجري‬: ‫ ثم قال‬.. " ‫مجندل تحت نجوم السماء‬
‫ يا ليتني مت قبل هذا اليوم‬: ‫ وقال‬، ‫وبكى عليه هو وأصحابه‬- ‫همومي وأحزاني‬
." ‫بعشرين سنة‬

6. This text is about imam Ali, during Siffeen nights, while fighting Muawiya,
envying Abdullah Bin Omar & Saad Bin Malik, for the solemn decision of them both,
not to indulge into the Camel Fitna, and Siffeen too. He is saying that if their decision
was right, then its reward is sure to be enormous, and if it was not right, then its risk is
the least. These are the words of a great man confessing his mistakes.

‫ " ل در مقام عبد ال بن عمر وسعد‬: ‫وكان يقول ليالي صفين‬ -

، ‫ إن كان برا إن أجره لعظيم‬- ‫ وهما ممن اعتزل الفتنة‬- ‫بن مالك‬
‫ ( فهذا‬209 / 6 ‫ ) منهاج السنة‬. " ‫وإن كان إثما إن خطره ليسير‬
‫ رغم قول أهل السنة أن عليا ومن معه أقرب‬، ‫قول أمير المؤمنين‬
. ‫إلى الحق‬
7. Here, Imam Ali did not consider his opponents in Alnahrawan as non-Muslims or
infidels even, he is telling his people that Alkhawarij were not heathens, nor
hypocrites, they were very close to reciting Quran, unlike hypocrites, and as a final
reply, he describes them to be (people who Assaulted Us, And We Had To Fight
Them Back)

‫ وهذا ثابت في كتب السنة وكتب‬، ‫ علي – رضي ال عنه – لم يكّفر الذين قاتلوه‬:
‫ فأما عند السنة فقد قال شيخ السلم إن الصحابة قاتلوا الخوارج بأمر‬، ‫الرافضة‬
‫ بل حرم علي بن أبي‬، ‫ إل أنهم لم يكفروهم‬، ‫ ولدفع شرهم عن المسلمين‬، ‫النبي‬
‫ وبرهن شيخ السلم على أن علي بن أبي طالب لم يكفر‬، ‫طالب أموالهم وسبيهم‬
‫ " كنت مع علي حين‬: ‫ فذكر طارق بن شهاب قال‬، ‫الخوارج بالصريح من أقواله‬
: ‫ قيل‬. ‫ من الشرك فروا‬: ‫ أمشركون هم ؟ قال‬: ‫ فقيل له‬، ‫فرغ من قتال أهل النهروان‬
‫ قوم بغوا‬: ‫ قيل فما هم ؟ قال‬. ‫ إن المنافقين ل يذكرون ال إل قليل‬: ‫فمنافقون ؟ قال‬
. (37942 ‫علينا فقاتلناهم ) رواه ابن أبي شيبة في المصنف‬

8. Not only Sunnie scholars approved of her quotes , this is a text from a Shiite
reference too(Bihar Alanwar by Almajlisi), saying that both sides thought that they
are the righteous ones, that's all:

‫ عن ابن طريف عن ابن علوان عن جعفر‬324 ‫ ص‬23 ‫ بحار النوار المجلسي ج‬-
‫" كان يقول لهل حربه أنا لم نقاتلهم على التكفير لهم و لم‬: ‫عن أبيه عليه السلم‬
. " ‫نقاتلهم على التكفير لنا و لكنا رأينا أنا على حق و رأوا أنهم على حق‬

9. Shaikh Al Islam, Ibn Taimiyah, says here that the quote of the Prophet telling
Aysha that she would be confronting Ali while he is right and she is wrong, is not true
and is sheer lying in fact, there is no sign of it in any reference, and that she rode out
for bringing Muslims together, rather than fighting, she used to weep over it, till her
veil gets moist. I myself do not approve of their story, that the Prophet had
prophesized it, telling her that she would be fighting Ali unrightfully, and that dogs of
a place called Al Haw'ab would be barking at her, as a sign. The Shiites say that she
inquired ,once hearing the dogs barking at her convoy, " Is This Site Al Haw'ab Itself?
" They add to it, that her companions lied, denying it,. They even go as stray as telling
that 70 sheikhs attended the incident ,were lying at her!!! With a brilliant memory like
hers, and a short duration like that (relatively), how come she forget her husband's
acknowledgment and warning ?Her Prophet- husband? It is all a made up fable, and
this is what I mean by marketing their myths:

‫" تقاتلين عليًا وأنت ظالمة له " قال شيخ السلم ابن‬: ‫ حديث النبي وقوله لعائشة‬:
، ‫ ول له إسناد معروف‬، ‫" فهذا ل يعرف في شيء من كتب العلم المعتمدة‬: ‫تيمية‬
‫ فإن عائشة‬، ‫ بل هو كذب قطعًا‬، ‫وهو بالموضوعات أشبه منه بالحاديث الصحيحة‬
‫ وظنت أن في خروجها‬، ‫ وإنما خرجت لقصد الصلح‬، ‫لم تقاتل ولم تخرج لقتال‬
‫ فكانت إذا‬، ‫ ثم تبين لها فيما بعد أن ترك الخروج كان أولى‬، ‫مصلحة للمسلمين‬
. " ‫ل خمارها‬ ّ ‫ذكرت خروجها تبكي حتى تب‬

10. This text is for the Prophet allowing a Muslim newly widowed woman, to void
her ( Iddah) rituals, and care for her palm trees:

": ‫فقد صح عن رسول ال – صلى ال عليه وسلم – من حديث جابر بن عبد ال قال‬
ّ ‫لا‬
‫ل‬ َ ‫سو‬ُ ‫ت َر‬
ْ ‫جاَء‬ َ ‫ل َفَنَهاَها َف‬
ً‫ج‬ُ ‫ت َر‬ ْ ‫ل َلَها َفَلِقَي‬
ٍ‫خ‬ْ ‫ج إَلى َن‬َ ‫خُر‬
ْ ‫ن َت‬
ْ ‫ت َأ‬
ْ ‫خاَلُتُه َفَأَراَد‬
َ ‫ت‬
ْ ‫طّلق‬
ُ
)."‫صّدقي َوَتْفَعِلي َمْعُروفا‬ َ ‫ن َت‬ ْ ‫ك َلَعّلك َأ‬
ِ ‫خَل‬
ْ ‫جّدي َن‬ ُ ‫جي َف‬ِ ‫خُر‬ْ ‫ "ا‬:‫ل‬َ ‫صلى ال عليه وسلم َفَقا‬
. ‫( وقال اللباني صحيح‬6/210 ‫النسائي‬
11. The Prophet would always be receptive for all jealousy acts from his wives. Al
Imam Al Bukhari tells here, that one wife of his did hit a servant's hand, causing the
servant to drop a plate carrying some edible stuff, sent to him by another wife. The
angry wife who dropped it was hosting him that day, it was her turn. He used the
fragmented plate to collect the scattered food, saying (Your Mother Had Felt Jealous),
he ordered to bring a new plate, and offered it to the wife whose plate had been
broken, and kept the broken one for the angry wife. My idea is , since he himself was
very much bearing and open-minded with the acts of his competing wives , knowing
that his passion for his wives ought to yield that tax, a human nature named
"Jealousy". why should we bother right now?:

‫الغيرة بين أزواج النبي حاصلة في حياة النبي – صلى ال عليه وسلم – وكان‬: ‫رابعًا‬
‫ولم يغضب رسول‬، ‫ لن هذا من طبائع النساء‬، ‫يرى ذلك ويبتسم ويقرهن على هذا‬
‫ كما في البخاري من حديث عن‬، ‫ال – صلى ال عليه وسلم – يغضب من غيرتهن‬
‫ فأرسلت إحدى أمهات‬،‫ " كان النبي صلى ال عليه وسلم عند بعض نسائه‬:‫أنس قال‬
‫ فضربت التي النبي صلى ال عليه وسلم في بيتها يد‬،‫المؤمنين بصحفة فيها طعام‬
‫ فجمع النبي صلى ال عليه وسلم فلق الصفحة ثم‬،‫ فسقطت الصحفة فانفلقت‬،‫الخادم‬
‫ )غارت أمكم( ثم حبس لخادم‬:‫ ويقول‬،‫جعل يجمع فيها الطعام الذي كان في الصحفة‬
‫حتى أتي بصحفة من عند التي هو في بيتها‪ ،‬فدفع الصحفة الصحيحة إلى التي كسرت‬
‫صحفتها‪ ،‬وأمسك المكسورة في بيت التي كسرت " ‪.‬‬

‫‪12. This very track brings how Alhasan blamed his father ,Imam Ali, for his attitude‬‬
‫‪during Othman's assassination, and his perspective of how to deal with his rivals,‬‬
‫‪Talha & Alzubair, in stead of confronting them , this is a very important text since it‬‬
‫‪gives a clear idea of how all those icons used to think, and debate, Alhasan suggesting‬‬
‫‪a better mode od election, the majority one, while his father sees it differently, that he‬‬
‫‪had been deprived of his right ever since the Prophet died, and that he had opted to‬‬
‫‪fight those who did not agree to him being a Caliph, using what is made available to‬‬
‫‪him as followers, i.e. his voters were a minority .Moreover, Alhasan seems here to be‬‬
‫‪denouncing most of his father's choices, and expecting that Muawiya will be taking‬‬
‫‪over, since his relative, Othman, had been done wrong, and killed for no justified‬‬
‫‪reason. It shows that Imam Ali had assisted Othman with both sons of his, but‬‬
‫‪Othman himself rejected any confrontation and did not resort to armed defense :‬‬

‫" فقال أبو ثور‪ :‬كنت فيمن حاصر عثمان فكنت آخذ سلحي وأضعه‪ ،‬وعلي ينظر‬
‫إلي ل يأمرني ول ينهاني‪ ،‬فلما كانت البيعة له‪ *،‬غير طعن الكلى وضرب الرقاب‬
‫فلما أتى عليا الكتاب‪ ،‬ورأى ما فيه‪ ،‬وما هو مشتمل عليه‪ ،‬وكره ذلك‪ ،‬وقام فأتى‬
‫منزله فدخل عليه الحسن ابنه‪ ،‬فقال له‪ :‬أما وال كنت أمرتك فعصيتني‪ ،‬فقال له‬
‫علي‪ :‬وما أمرتني به فعصيتك فيه ؟ قال‪ :‬أمرتك أن تركب رواحلك‪ ،‬فتلحق بمكة‬
‫المشرفة‪ ،‬فل تتهم به‪ ،‬ول تحل شيئا من أمره فعصيتني‪ ،‬وأمرتك حين دعيت إلى‬
‫البيعة أن ل تبسط يدك إل على بيعة جماعة‪ ،‬فعصيتني‪ ،‬وأمرتك حين خالف عليك‬
‫طلحة والزبير أن ل تكرههما على البيعة‪ ،‬وتخلي بينهما وبين وجههما‪ ،‬وتدع‬
‫الناس يتشاورون عاما كامل‪ ،‬فوال لو تشاوروا عاما ما زويت عنك‪ ،‬ول وجدوا‬
‫منك بدا‪ ،‬وأنا آمرك اليوم أن تقيلهما بيعتهما‪ ،‬وترد إلى الناس أمرهم‪ ،‬فإن رفضوك‬
‫رفضتهم‪ ،‬وإن قبلوك قبلتهم‪ ،‬فإني وال قد رأيت الغدر في رؤوسهم‪ ،‬وفي وجوههم‬
‫النكث والكراهية‪ .‬فقال له علي‪ :‬أنا إذا مثلك‪ ،‬ل وال يا بني‪ ،‬ولكن أقاتل بمن‬
‫أطاعني من عصاني‪ ،‬وأيم ال يا بني ما زلت مبغيا علي منذ هلك جدك‪ ،‬فقال له‬
‫الحسن‪ :‬وأيم ال يا أبت ليظهرن عليك معاوية‪ ،‬لن ال تعالى قال‪) :‬ومن قتل‬
‫مظلوما فقد جعلنا لوليه سلطانا( ] السراء‪ [ 33 :‬فقال علي‪ :‬يا بني‪ ،‬وما علينا من‬
‫ظلمه‪ ،‬وال ما ظلمناه‪ ،‬ول أمرنا‬
‫________________________________________‬
‫)‪ (1‬زيد في الطبري‪ :‬فأبى علي وقال‪ :‬وال ل كان هذا أبدا‪ (2) .‬ابن كثير ذكر في‬
‫البداية والنهاية أن عليا ولى الشام سهل بن حنيف‪(*) .‬‬
‫________________________________________‬
‫] ‪[ 69‬‬

‫ول نصرنا عليه‪ ،‬ول كتبت فيه إلى أحد سوادا في بياض‪ ،‬وإنك لتعلم أن أباك أبرأ‬
‫الناس من دمه ومن أمره‪ .‬فقال له الحسن‪ :‬دع عنك هذا‪ ،‬وال إني ل أظن‪ ،‬بل ل‬
‫ يا‬:‫ فقال‬.‫( ول عذراء ول صبي إل وعليه كفل من دمه‬1) ‫أشك أن ما بالمدينة عاتق‬
‫ وقد أرسلتكما‬،‫بني إنك لتعلم أن أباك قد رد الناس عنه مرارا أهل الكوفة وغيرهم‬
‫ ونهى أهل الدار‬،‫ فنهاكما عن القتال‬،‫جميعا بسيفيكما لتنصراه وتموتا دونه‬
:‫ قال الحسن‬.‫ أو أموت بين يديه‬،‫ و أيم ال لو أمرني بالقتال لقاتلت دونه‬.‫أجمعين‬
‫ ثم‬:‫ قال‬.‫ حتى يحكم ال بين عباده يوم القيامة فيما كانوا فيه يختلفون‬،‫دع عنك هذا‬
‫ فأين هو يا‬:‫ هل لك يا مغيرة في ال ؟ قال‬:‫ فقال له علي‬،‫دخل المغيرة بن شعبة‬
،‫ فتدرك من سبقك‬،‫ فتدخل معنا في هذا المر‬،‫ تأخذ سيفك‬:‫أمير المؤمنين ؟ قال‬
‫ وتقطف الرؤوس‬،‫ فإني أرى أمورا ل بد للسيوف أن تشحذ لها‬،‫وتسبق من معك‬
‫ ول قتله‬،‫ إني وال يا أمير المؤمنين ما رأيت عثمان مصيبا‬:‫ فقال المغيرة‬،‫بها‬
‫ أن أضع‬- ‫ إن أذنت لي‬- ‫ فأريد يا أمير المؤمنين‬،‫ وإنها لظلمة تتلوها ظلمات‬،‫صوابا‬
‫ نقفو آثار‬،‫ فنسري مبصرين‬،‫سيفي وأنام في بيتي حتى تنجلي الظلمة ويطلع قمرها‬
‫ فكن من أمرك على ما بدا‬،‫ قد أذنت لك‬:‫ قال علي‬.‫ ونتقي سبيل الجائرين‬،‫المهتدين‬
‫ يغلبك من‬.‫ معاذ ال يا مغيرة تقعد أعمى بعد أن كنت بصيرا‬:‫ فقام عمار فقال‬.‫لك‬
‫ فأما أنا فل أكون إل في الرعيل‬،‫ انظر ما ترى وما تفعل‬،‫ ويسبقك من سبقته‬،‫غلبته‬
‫ فر من‬،‫ إياك أن تكون كقاطع السلسلة‬،‫ يا أبا اليقظان‬:‫ فقال له المغيرة‬.‫الول‬
.‫الضحل فوقع في الرمضاء‬

‫ هجرية‬276 ‫)تاريخ الخلفاء( من تأليف إبن قتيبه الدينوري المتوفي سنة‬

A Final Word
It is not only about Aysha, dear friend, it is about a tilted understanding of Islam and
feeling envious of icons other than Imam Ali. The hard thing about defending Aysha
this time was having to talk about Imam Ali, and stripping him off any added glory
before delving . Her father ,Abu Bakr, who had been accompanying the Prophet on
their mutual Hegira(Migration) from Mecca to Medina, was mentioned in Quran as
(Sahib= mate=companion), actually, this is the very title used by Indian & Pakistani
Muslims as a name and adjective too. If you view one of their scholars books
touching this issue, you will find that he focused on comparing that term (Sahib) with
other applications, trying to rob Abu Bakr of any credit, the scholar, a Lebanese
author named Mohammad Jawad Mughniyah, brought another example from Surat
Alkahf, where an anonymous person is boasting his wealth, saying to his (Sahib), "I
am richer than you, as to my wealth and family", the author was sending his
venomous suggestions, saying that (Not every Sahib is necessarily pious or honest)!!!
Actually, one is forced to bring a counter example before his mind, that the
term( Imam) is not necessarily good, since in one specific location in Quran, God tells
us that some bad people were made to be (Imams) leading their followers to hell !!!
But you could never come across such a degradation or shaking of belief, by any
Sunnie scholar, not even the Wahabies who are considered radicals by the Shiites
themselves, for Imam Ali is revered by Sunnies to an extent that is beyond such
mimicking . Another, called Sharaf Aldeen Sadr Aldeen, had been judging all acts of
Omar & Abu Bakr, those which he classified as not up to Quranic texts!! He named it
(Ta'awul)!!!Funny how Non-Arabs go on inventing terms and pump it into the
memory of people!! Actually, he skipped too many acts of Imam Ali likewise, that
were totally improvised by him, like serving a skinny fornicator with a whole bunch
of whips ,fearing that he might be dead if punished the classic way( He is said to have
been copying Job's story, as he were acknowledged of this maneuver of dodging a
cruel promise to punish his wife), or shuffling the capital of the state from Medina to
Kufa, whereas the Prophet himself did not make it Mecca even , and it was what the
first three caliphs used to keep . The issue is much greater than this tip of that
iceberg .It is also about what degree of freedom is granted to any Caliph. Omar Bin
Abdul Azeez, namely the fifth Rashid Caliph, although an Umayyad one, was the first
to improvise the idea of (Khan) concept, a building that serves as a shelter for
traveling convoys, barracks, a motel, and restaurant too, to provide comfort and
security for convoys roaming very distant roads after Islam managed to reach as
distant places as China & India, a necessity that had to be catered for. Shiite scholars
denied any Caliph other than Ali ,of any right to improvise or introduce any facility or
regulation that serves life for the people, considering that it is only Ali & his dynasty
who are to enjoy this right ! I myself see that they have been double-dealing all the
time.

I ask of you to forgive me for elaborating more than what you might have been
requesting. It is another www, a war with words, where they had been trying their best
to defame and deform Islam, trying to customize it to the extreme glorification of
Kisra/Khosrau, typical understanding of Persians for their rulers, the idea of inheriting
the authority to the same family, the family that is beyond any questioning since they
derive their power from the Deity Himself !! regarding them as Gods, in order to
secure their seized hunt and abort any uprising or revolutions. This is a jigsaw thing,
where each little part of it contribute to the full understanding of the whole image, and
the whole image explains the details of each part. Yours is an academic landscape,
where every thing goes smoothly and systematically, mine is a battlefield, claws and
fangs, and all available weaponry. This is a combined response, by a few good men of
my contacts who contributed to much of this work , never been made to see or hear
each other in fact, but we see each other through our hearts, and this is one great thing
about my folks, they refused to be defined by names, intending the whole thing for
Him alone. The initials of the first two are" Dr. Abu Abdallah" , ( Both of them
having the same title ) , and the third is Mr. Arab German , as he is addressed on
Arabtimes site . I am adding this attribution here against their preference ,not to thank
them , but to exclude the idea that I am one . Actually, I am honored by each one of
them, for the distinguished zealous spirit of theirs, defending their Prophet's image .