Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Current Practice
Jurairat Buaphiban, M.D.
Sirindhorn National Medical Rehabilitation Institute,
Thailand
26 March, 2018 1
Professor Vaclav Vojta
“1950 – 1970” 2
Vojta therapy in
Thailand
3
1 คน 1 คน
3 คน 2 คน
2 คน
2 คน
2 คน
1 คน
2 คน
1 คน
10 คน
1 คน
7 คน
1 คน
15 คน
1 คน
6 คน
2 คน
1 คน
1 คน
4
The Important of Vojta principle
5
Important factor to
develop the movement Vojta assessment
1. Postural reaction 1. Spontaneous movement
2. Uprighting and uprighting
mechanism mechanism compared
3. Differentiation vs with normal postural
Holokinetic development
2. Postural reaction by
4. Motivation to take
Postural reflex test
contact
3. Primitive reflex
8
9
- Landau reaction*
โดย Landau ,1923
- Axillary hanging reaction
โดย Vojta 1967/1969
- Side tilting reaction
- Horizontal side hanging reaction*
โดย Collis, 1954
- Vertical side hanging reaction*
โดย Peiper และ Isbert ,1927
- Vertical side hanging reaction*
โดย Collis, 1954
11
11
Summary
Total number of
Abnormal postural Normal result
reactions Mildest C.C.D.
(1 – 3 abn.post.reaction)
Predominantly mild C.C.D.
abnormal side (4 – 5 abn.post.reaction)
Moderatrly severe
(6 – 7 abn.post.reaction)
Postural developmental age
Min Max Severe C.C.D. (7 abn.post.reaction and
additional obvious disturbance in tone)
12
central coordination disturbance
2308 patients displayed as percentage
80 69.74
70
60
50
40
30
18.77
20
7.22 3.86
10 0.41
0
Normal Leichteste ZKS Leichte ZKS Mittelschwere Schwere ZKS
ZKS
Costi, G.C. et al.: Vojta's seven postural reactions for screening of neuromotorial
diseases in infant, research of 2308 case. La PediatrMedica e Chirurgica, Vol. 5,Nr 1-2
(1983), pp 59-65
13
Prognosis of Symptomatic risk Children
Or children with abnormal postural reaction
Postural reaction Prevalence of all Developed into Suggestion
population (study in normal without
~ 8000 children) treatment
(Imamura et al)
all postural reaction normal 70 % 100 % No need to follow up
Mildest Central coordination disturbance: > 90 % Follow up at 6 – 8
1 - 3 abnomal postural reaction weeks
Mild Central coordination disturbance: Follow up at 4 – 6
~ 25 % ~ 75 %
4 - 5 abnomal postural reaction weeks
Moderately severe
Start treatment with
central coordination disturbance 3-5% ~45 %
Vojta Therapy
6 - 7 abnormal postural reaction
Severe Central coordination disturbance
7 abnomal postural reaction and Start treatment with
0,5 % ~10 %
additional abnormal tone Vojta Therapy
14
Abnormal development in central coordination disturbance
Without treatment 211 patients (Imamura et al.)
Number Group Turn to CP (ร้อยละของ n)
107 Very mildly (LLB) 2.6
67 Mild (LB) 4.5
13 Mod severe (MB) 30.7
24 Severe (SB) 37.5
With treatment 713 patients (Vojta et al.)
number Group Turn to CP (ร้อยละของ n)
17
Therapy goal
• Therapy goal is to facilitate
- the automatic regulation of the body position
- the active maintenance of the support function of the
extremities
- the coordination of muscle activity
19
Reflex creeping
20
Reflex locomotion
• Reflex rolling
first phase • Reflex creeping
6 variations
second phase
21
Reflex Rolling 1st phase
Abdominal contraction
• Hip ext. rotation and hip flexion presented Posterior pelvic tilt
22
Vojta treatment effect
• Depend on frequency of discharge, summation by duration,
summation of zones
• After discharge: 45 minutes
• Twice a day, 20 mins each session
=40 minute treatment time + 2x45 minutes “after discharge”
=130 min. activated status
• four times a day, 10 mins each session
=40 mins treatment time + 4x45 minutes “after discharge”
=220 mins activated status 24
the vojta therapy may not be delivered in case of :
• febile patient
• acute inflammatory illness
• malignant tumor
• 10days after immunization
• pregnant patient
25
Indication for Vojta therapy
• Moderately and severe Central coordination disturbance
• Asymmetrical presented: Scoliosis, Torticollis
• Cerebral palsy
• Delayed motor development
• Spinal cord syndrome
• Muscular disease
• Weakness due to Peripheral nerve injury
• Congenital anomaly: limb deficiency
31
32
Research: SNMRI
• Effect of postural control and activites of daily living in
children with spastic diplegia: A comparison between
conventional PT and vojta therapy
• 64 children
– Conventional PT: individual – PROME, strengthening exercise, trunk
control in sitting position 3 days/week, 120 min/ session x 8 weeks
– Vojta: Therapy 3 days/week, 30 min/ session x 8 weeks
• Compared 2 groups: RCT
– Postural control: Trunk control measurement scale
– ADL: PEDI
33
Vojta therapy in cerebral palsy: CRC SNMRI
• Spastic diplegia: 60%, spastic tetraplegia 30%, spastic
hemiplegia 10%
• Improved 1 level of GMFCS: 20%
• 80% remaining:
– No improvement of GMFCS
– Improved quality of movement
• Head and neck control in prone: child canextend his neck higher and in
longer duration
• Standing with/ without support,
34
We are Team Dr. Jakkapong Dr. Jurairat
PT Assistance
OT
Napat Nongnuch
Sasithorn
Sawitree
Nitchakan
Suleewan Mod
Wimwipa
Ratwaree Jay
Somporn
Thank You