Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
EH403; 5:30-7:30 PM
Coverage: Topics 1 - 3
Adrian
6. Do workers have rights in relation to Labor Relations? If yes, what are those specific rights?
8. Aside from the Constitution and statutes as primary sources of Labor Relations, can you think
of any other sources of Labor Relations?
9. Would it be correct to say that aside from the Constitution and Statutes as primary sources, are
rules implementing the Labor Code part and parcel of Labor Relations?
Nikka
12. Can these rules and regulations, amend or revise Labor Relations law?
13. In the event that there is conflict between Labor Relations law and Rules promulgated by the
Secretary of Labor, which will prevail?
14. So we are saying that the power of the Secretary of Labor, must be limited within the confines
and parameters of the law itself?
15. So the implementing rules which conflict the law, what becomes? Is it void?
16. Can the implementing rules which conflict with the law, can it be challenged and set aside as
null and void?
17. Who will adjudicate in case of conflict with the law, to determine the validity of the rules?
18. Aside from these implementing rules and regulations, being a source of Labor Relations Law,
what about decisions rendered by the Labor Arbiter involving Labor Relations Law, would these
decisions consider part of the legal system?
21. Does the Civil Code mention decisions of the Supreme Court?
22. Are you saying decisions of the Labor Arbiters are not judicial decisions?
25. Based on your study, when you speak of judicial decisions, they refer to whose decision?
26. Is there any instance that the decisions rendered by the Labor Arbiter involving Labor
Relations law became part of the law of the land?
Carlo Dennis
28. Is that the same statutory provision that we use in Labor Standards Law?
29. I’m just curious, what do you understand of the word Labor?
31. Why does the law resolves doubt in favour of Labor? Why is the law designed that way?
35. But employment contracts are not laws? Why do we need to extend it to employment
contracts?
36. So, if what is stipulated in the employment contract is vague, can we apply Article 4 of the
Labor Code to resolve the ambiguity in favour of the employee?
Nilo
37. Under the applicable law, how will you describe the relation between capital and labor? How
does the Civil Code describe the relation?
41. We have the principle of non-oppression under the Civil Code, what is that?
43. So since Labor Relations speaks of two principal parties, the employer and employee, when
is one considered to be an employee? What principle of law should we adopt, whether an
employer-employee relation exists?
47. What is wages? What article in the Labor Code can we find wages?
48. Who fixes the wages between the employer and employee?
51. Is it safe to say that if the relation is capital and labor, it is the employer who defines the
qualification of the job?
57. Between the two (employee and independent contractor), who is covered under the protection
of our Labor laws?
58. Why is the independent contractor outside the protection of our Labor laws?