Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Yacimientos Naturalmente
Fracturados Vugulares
Outcrop of fractured-vuggy medium. This kind of medium, such as carbonate reservoir, J.Y. Zhao-Q. Huang: Fractured Vuggy Carbonate
underground karst aquifer, etc., exist extensively in nature. A fracture is the smallest Reservoir Simulation, Springer Geophysics, 2017
geologic structure, almost existing in all the stratums. Lucia defined vugs as a sort of caves whose pore spaces are larger than
intergranular pore which are formed because of dissolution occurring in carbonate & sulfate. Vugs can be connecting with
fractures in stratum as in Fig. 3.1b, f. Fractured-vuggy medium has complicated internal structure, including multi-scale spatial vugs,
whose volumes range from millimeter scale to meter scale. Meanwhile a large number of logging, core, & outcrop materials indicate
that fractures & vugs can be filled by calcite, dolomite, etc.,
Introducción
Durante el proceso de disolución se formaron vúgulos en los carbonatos. Estos
vúgulos pueden estar aislados ó conectados entre sí. La conexión entre vúgulos
puede darse a través de halos de alta porosidad que los rodean. Así se tienen en
algunos casos medios porosos vugulares con diferentes % de porosidad en
matriz, halos porosos, y vúgulos.
Network properties of a 2D natural pattern, mapped from the surface of a wellbore, are investigated by
using borehole images. Electrical images are essentially conductivity map of borehole wall within the
flushed zone. Electrical images can be transformed into a porosity map by using the classic Archie
saturation eqn in flushed zone. By statistically examining the distribution of ϕ over a short interval (1.2
in), it is possible to separate ϕm fraction from that of
fracture and vugs.
From the analysis of the images we can extract either conductive or resistive features from the data. Comprehensive processing is
performed to precisely contour the edges of each feature and to determine the degree to which these features are interconnected.
Fracture/vug connectivity/ permeability index can be calculated. This technique has been used in a number of wells and results
correlate with production data.
Stokes–Brinkman eqs on a Multiscale Mixed Finite El with Darcy model
Method
A. Gulbransen, et.al: A Multiscale Mixed Finite-element Method For Vuggy and Naturally-fractured Reservoirs, 21 Nordic Seminar on Computational Mechanics,
2008
Case 1 considers inclusion of several circular vugs in a homogeneous porous medium represented on a 90 × 90 grid. Fig 1 shows
MsMFE soln computed on a coarse 3 × 3 grid, compared with a reference solution obtained by solving the Stokes–Brinkman eqs on
fine grid. MsMFE soln resolves global flow pattern correctly & that details around vugs are
well captured. Case 2 considers a combination of vugs & fractures that connect some of the vugs & provide long-range correlation in
reservoir. Fig 2 shows MsMFE soln compared with fine-scale reference soln. Also in this case, MsMFE method is able to accurately
J. Y. Zhao-Q. Huang: Fractured Vuggy Carbonate Reservoir Simulation, Springer Geophysics, 2017 Fig. 6.20 Schematic of three sample models
Fracture-vugs
model shown
in Fig. 6.20 is
constructed.
The model is
calculated by
MsMFEM
(Multi-Scale
Mixed Finite
Element
Method) &
FEM,
respectively.
The sample is
25 mX25 m. A
pressure
gradient of 1.0
MPa/m along
x-direction is
Fig. 6.21 Pressure and velocity distributions. created by
a FEM, b MsMFEM imposing
pressure on
the left & right Fig. 6.22 Pressure distribution for
vertical fine-scale solution and MsMFEM
boundary. No
flow at top &
bottom sides of
the domain. k
is 10 −6 m2.
Aperture of
fractures = 10
cm. Pressure distributions
along x-direction on y = 12
m is shown in Fig. 6.22.
Numerical results have
shown that the results
from MsMFEM are in
close agreement with fine-
scale solutions.
NF karst reservoirs presents multiple challenges for numerical simulations of
various fluid flow problems. Such reservoirs are characterized by the presence
of fractures, vugs & caves at multiple scales, as shown in Fig. 1.
P. Popov, et.al.: Multiscale Modeling & Simulations of Flows in Naturally Fractured Karst Reservoirs, Communications in Computational
Physics, 2009.
Background permeability field is homogeneous with k = 1mD. The fine-scale solution is shown in Fig. 4. It can
be seen that, velocity inside the vugs several times bigger than in the matrix & connected nearby vugs tend to
create flow channels. Moreover, the velocity profile in elongated vugs resembles that of a Poiseuille flow with
the maximum velocity in the center of the vug.
P. Popov, et.al.: Multiscale Modeling & Simulations of Flows in Naturally Fractured Karst Reservoirs, Communications in
Computational Physics, 2009.
Z. Kang, Y.-S. Wu, J. Li, Y.
Wu, J. Zhang, G. Wang,
Modeling Multiphase Flow
in Naturally Fractured
Vuggy Petroleum
Reservoirs, Society of
Petroleum Engineers,
2006. doi:
10.2118/102356-MS.
Diagrama
esquemático
modificado de un
sistema fracturado
vugular
Influencia de Características de Redes de Fracturas
y Vúgulos, y Matriz en Capacidad de
Almacenamiento y en Productividad de Pozos
Timotej Verbovšek: Fractal analysis of the distribution of cave lengths in Slovenia, Acta
Carsologica 36/3, 369-377, Postojna 2007
0.14
0.14
Porosidad Vugular
0.12
Porosidad Vugular
0.12
0.1 0.1
0.08 0.08
0.06 0.06
0.04 0.04
0.02
0.02
0
0
2000 2050 2100 2150 2200 2250
2200 2220 2240 2260 2280 2300 2320
Profundidad Profundidad
0.14 0.14
Porosidad Vugular
Porosida Vugular
0.12 0.12
0.1 0.1
0.08 0.08
0.06 0.06
0.04 0.04
0.02 0.02
0 0
2250 2300 2350 2400 2450 2500 2550 2450 2500 2550 2600 2650 2700 2750
Profundidad Profundidad
Porosidad Vugular(JSK)
0.14
0.12
Porosidad Vugular
0.1
0.08
0.06 Análisis de
Porosidad Vugular
0.04
0.02
0
2650 2700 2750 2800 2850
Profundidad
2900 2950 3000
por intervalo 16
Distribución de la porosidad de Marzouk 1995
10000.00
Winland plot
Vúgulos Conectados 30
1000.00
Macro porosity 10
5 Facies 1
100.00 Facies 2
3
Facies 3
Facies 4
Permeability
Facies 5
10.00 Meso porosidad 1 Facies 6
Pore Throat =0.03
0.5 Pore Throat =0.1
Pore Throat =0.3
0.3
1.00 Pore Throat =1
Pore Throat =3
Pore Throat =10
0.1 Pore Throat =30
0.10 Pore throat = 5 um
Pore throat = 0.5 um
Micro porosidad Vúgulos aislados 0.03
0.01
0.00
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0
Porosity
Yacimientos Fracturados
Vugulares
Histogramas Porosidad
Secundaria
(BTPKS-KM-KI-JST)
BTP-KS
BTP-KS
KM
KM
KI
KI
JST
18
Variación de “m” y “n” en núcleos por unidades
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
KM
KM
KM
KI
KI
K
BT S
BT S
BT S
BT S
S
T
JS
JS
JS
JS
JS
JS
PK
PK
PK
PK
PK
BT
0.12
0.1
PHI Secundaria
0.08
0.06
0.04 KI
0.02 JSK
0
1.5 2 2.5 3
"m"
20
Correlación con PLT, ejemplo JSK, Golfo de
Campeche
Aporte solo
por
porosidad
vugular
Aporte por
porosidad
vugular +
fracturas
Densidad
fractura
Fracturas
de esta
zona no
presentan
aporte
Aporte
ppalmente
por
porosidad
vugular
21
Importancia de la caracterización de yacimientos
22