SAN BARTOLOME ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Concepcion, Tarlac

ENHANCED SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (ESIP) APPRAISAL & REVIEW_ TOOL

School ID:106425_ School Name: SAN BARTOLOME ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Observed
Description Criteria Pre- Final Comment/Observation
Appraisal Review
Endorsement Is there an organized School Planning  YES  YES
Letter Team composed of but not limited to the  NO  NO
School Head, Teachers Representative,
Parents Representative, Students and
Brgy. or LGU Representatives indicating
their signatures in the endorsement
letter in a suggested format?
Approval Sheet Is there an approval sheet in a suggested  YES  YES
format?  NO  NO

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Executive Is there an executive summary of the over-  YES  YES
Summary all conduct of the Planning Process,  NO  NO
including the discussion of but not limited
to the legal bases, its purpose and the
planning process?
INTRODUCTION
A. Vision, Are the DepEd Vision, Mission and Core  YES  YES
Mission and Values stated?  NO  NO
Core Values
B. School Is there a complete, logical and concise  YES  YES
Situation presentation of school situation based on  NO  NO
the assessment of the following:
a. current status of children
b. status and trends in the realization of
the school’s contributions to the
achievement of the Division Goals and
Objectives
c. school systems and processes that
facilitate and hinder the attainment of
school objectives and targets
K to 12 (PRIORITY IMPROVEMENT AREAS) (Only applicable learning stage(s) to the school should be included)
K to Grade 3 Is there a logical narrative discussion of the  YES  YES
Grade 4 to 6 school’s prioritization of the most pressing  NO  NO
Grade 7 to needs or problems that surfaced in school
10 and learners data that contributes to the
Grade 11 to school’s intermediate outcomes for Access
12 and Quality?
(discussion for

Are the priority areas clearly stated with an  YES  YES

evident linkage to with an evident linkage  NO  NO
to the Department’s Vision, Mission and
each learning Core Values?
stage)
Are the priority areas directed towards
improving school effectiveness?

GOVERNANCE
Governance Is there a logical narrative discussion of the  YES  YES
school’s prioritization of the most pressing  NO  NO
needs or problems that are school
governance-related and contribute to the
organization’s governance intermediate
outcomes?
MONITORING AND EVALUATION
Content Is the Monitoring and Evaluation Plan  YES  YES
comprehensive and complete?  NO  NO

Validity and Is the Monitoring and Evaluation Plan  YES  YES

Feasibility technically and managerially feasible?  NO  NO
ANNUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (Year 1)
Content Is the required detailed content (as suggested  YES  YES
by the format) provided for the plan and is  NO  NO
aligned with all other related documents?
Validity and Is the plan technically, financially, and  YES  YES
Feasibility managerially feasible and sustainable?  NO  NO
ANNEXES
Are the School-Community Data Profile  YES  YES
following  NO  NO
Annexes Child Mapping Tool  YES  YES
included with  NO  NO
complete and Child-friendly School Survey  YES  YES
concise data  NO  NO
and used
Child Protection Policy Implementation  YES  YES
proper
Checklist  NO  NO
template?
Student-Led School Watching  YES  YES
 NO  NO
Gap Analysis  YES  YES
 NO  NO
Priority Improvement Areas  YES  YES
 NO  NO
Planning Worksheet  YES  YES
 NO  NO
School Process  YES  YES
 NO  NO
Root Cause Analysis  YES  YES
 NO  NO
Project Work Plans and Budget Matrices  YES  YES
 NO  NO
School Report Card (SRC) Summary of  YES  YES
Information  NO  NO
School Report Card (SRC)  YES  YES
 NO  NO
Prepared by:

ROSALIE J. SANTIANO
ESHT-III