Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
by
A Thesis
of Lehigh University
Master of Science
in
Civil Engineering
Lehigh University
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
September 1987
r '
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
work was supervised by Dr. Lynn S. Beedle who is the Director of the
' '
- .( iii
limitless energy that he has so enthusiastically devoted to the "World
Mr. Jerome S.B. Iffland has played a key role in the development
Group 11, and his many excellent suggestions and practical advice are
Group 11) and Dr. Gerald W. Schulz are also due acknowledgement for
were also received from Dr. Le Wu Lu, Dr. Alexis Ostapenko, Mr. Gerard
-- iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
ABSTRACT 1
1. INTRODUCTION 3
2. SPECIFICATIONS 11
4.3 Timing 33
v
5. A NEW "WORLD VIEW" APPROACH TO THE PROBLEM 36
5.6.1 Language 46
5.6.2 Nomenclature 47
vi
Page
7. FUTURE WORK 67
7.2 Computerization 68
8. SUMMARY 76
TABLES 80
REFERENCES 87
ABBREVIATIONS 94
APPENDICES 95
VITA 145
vii
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
viii
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix Page
Composite Structures.
definition) .
"Compression Members").
Specification Provisions
ix
ABSTRACT
comparing the various stability provisions, so that the reasons for the
this effort is utilizing many of the techniques that are presented and
discussed here.
activities are given together with information on the format that could
-1-
1
1~j ~
A procedure for the development of consistent nomenclature is
/
to proceed effectively.
a failure mode that must be considered, and the parameters that can
-2-
1. INTRODUCTION
any means and for this reason the field has generated a variety of
-3-
) the case of structural stability, where so many conflicting solutions
have been proposed that instability would appear to be one of the least
-4-
of research results and this in turn enabled them to make better use of
design provisions (SSRC, 1976; EGGS, 1976; CRCJ, 1979; CMEA, 1976).
The SSRC published its first edition of "The Guide to Design Criteria
1972).
-5-
Studies" (Task Group 11) planned the Second International Colloquium on
Tokyo (ECCS, 1976), Liege (ECCS, 1977), Washington (SSRC, 1977) and
instability.
Winter and Duiliu Sfintesco, the SSRC initiated the "World View"
from Japan, North America, East Europe and West Europe to report on the
those regions (see Table 1). It was the intention of the project
-6-
The idea of comparing various design specifications was not a new
of member types and few had encompassed as many nations as would the
following sections:
-7-
these sesions was to promote discussion on the differences between the
Colloquium also hoped that other regions, which were not involved in
observations.
provisions have been reevaluated. It is likely that the next few years
attributed to:
-8-
\
As more and more practicing engineers use some form of the Limit
Firstly, "a very limited number of engineers possess the overall grasp
-9-
Researchers and specification writers are strongly influenced by
are based.
1983 the SSRC task group for "International Cooperation" initiated the
planning for a second edition of the Report which would complete the
exist.
- .....
-10-
2. SPECIFICATIONS
developments, and
-11-
A specification therefore should contain a summary of proven data,
results. This is necessary because the average designer does not have
the time to collect, critically examine and evaluate all the relevant
writing committee would have considered all possible modes in which the
structure might fail to fulfill its intended purpose, and would have
-12-
fully and its reliability has been established.
At the other end of the spectrum, these same authors suggest that
-13-
structures shall be designed by [licensed professional] engineers".
The emphasis is then placed firmly on ensuring that the engineer who
(Schulz, 1984).
consider the nature of the committees that produce them. The fact that
specifications.
-14-
reasons for the diversity of existing specifications. Surprisingly, it
follows:
authorities)
backing
national or state)
e. learned societies
f. academic bodies
-15-
The degree to which these groups are involved in the
are frequently steered by economic factors. During the early 1970s the
the EuroCodes would have a favorable effect on the export trade with
regions outside the EEC (ISE, 1984). A similar effort was undertaken
-16-
specifications being instituted by the Council for Mutual Economic Aid
(Halasz, 1983).
Appendix 2.
from one type of structure to another, but member behavior and strength
-17-
In the USA, designs are controlled by local, state or national
to the problem.
-18-
3. THE IMPORTANCE OF STABILITY
Although this report does not deal with the complex concepts of
structural safety and reliability (refer to SSRC, 1976 and EGGS, 1976),
-19-
to be subjected during construction and use -- and with a sufficient
take into account any environmental effects that might influence the
durability of the structure over its intended life span. The basic
f. design error
g. construction error
Many of these causes are beyond the control of the designer, but each
-20-
A structure can be considered to have failed when it reaches the
as the "ultimate load limit state", where the structure fails in its
sliding).
fatigue.
-21-
following conditions:
structure.
Both the ultimate load and serviceability limit states are governed by
earthquake loads
or support displacement
b. structural parameters
- material properties
-22-
c. environmental parameters
often with regard to each possible failure mode. Of all the failure
world.
(SSRC, 1987).
-23-
The current trend of rationalizing structural designs in order
·for a perfect slender column, much research work has been directed at
a. Geometric factors
bowing
-24-
- inadvertant initial out-of-straightness (camber or sweep),
members
panel zones
members
- non-prismatic members
---
-25-
- post-buckling behavior
b. Material Factors
inclusions, etc.)
members
- strain-hardening
c. Loading Factors
- non-proportional loading
-26-
For many structures certain second-order (non-linear) effects must
minor. For this reason it is important that the designer select those
(Massonnet, 1983).
The first and second geometric factors listed in (a.) above are
-27-
consequently the stability, of the structure. Under an increasing
a. Bifurcation Buckling
b. Limit-Load Instability
-28-
have on compression members, research workers have recognized that
has led to the near universal acceptance of the maximum strength theory
(Zandonini, 1983).
a. local buckling
b. torsional buckling
c. flexural-torsional buckling
d. flexural buckling
e. shell buckling
by the project. The global trend towards use of the limit states
-29-
"allowable stress design" specifications. Consequently, many of these
a. residual stresses
b. initial out-of-straightness
cold-formed members
specified.
-30-
4. COOPERATION IN SPECIFICATION DEVELOPMENT
There are few industries that are not taking advantage of the
-31-
continue as future international trade agreements are expected to exert
-32-
interest in recent advances that have been made through cooperative
interests.
4.3 Timing
-33-
cooperative specification until each participating organization has
a small number of generous individuals who give their own time free for
-34-
acceptable specification can take a considerable amount of time. Rowe
the various material grades, and section shapes and sizes in which
-35-
5. A NEW "WORLD VIEW" APPROACH TO THE PROBLEM
then redefined to emphasize those aspects that the project had either
r
.-·
inadequately addressed, or ignored completely. Apart from being
selected specifications,
-36-
3. to explain why differences between comparable provisions
exist, and
because of its prior involvement in the World View effort, and secondly
therefore most appropriate that the SSRC should take advantage of its
For the duration of the original World View effort, three members
were also responsible for the overall editing of the first edition of
-37-
"Coordinating Editors". This team of Coordinating Editors included
and Gerald W. Schulz, with the SSRC Technical Secretary completing the
regions. This not only simplified the management of the project but it
workers and many of the North American stability provisions have been
-38-
chapters of the second edition, and so will be referred to as "Chapter
Editors".
Once every region has assigned its Chapter Editors to the topical
compared.
background information.
provisions.
discussed in detail.
-39-
5.5 Selection of Applicable Specifications
scope will relate to the topical and geographical coverage. This will
task groups (SSRC, 1986). These closely follow many of the topical
in Table 2.
-40-
The following chapter topics and scopes have been proposed and
composite beams)
members)
-41-
11. Cold-formed Members - members that are cold-formed to shape
and girders
provisions that are common to more than one member type should be
"Compression Members".
a. Limits of Applicability
b. Material
d. Design Basis
-42-
5.5.2 Selection by Re~ion
representation.
easily obtained, and while this may generally offer some indication of
-43-
Wherever stability-related research work is conducted, it can be
appropriate:
Australia
Brazil
India
Japan
South Africa
Turkey
-44-
Other countries which are not known to be engaged in stability
South Korea
Taiwan
in the renewed World View effort are; Australia, East Europe, Japan,
North America, the People's Republic of China and West Europe. Table 5
shows all participants who are currently involved in the renewed World
View effort.
for use. (See Appendix 3 for the selected North American specifications
-45-
language is involved, this may be a difficult and costly exercise. The
5.6.1 Language
the documents.
-46-
5.6.2 Nomenclature
standardizing the nomenclature could occupy far more time and effort
each chapter topic also makes use of some specialized symbols and
Nomenclature".
-47-
Variation amongst symbols and their definitions is considered to
be one of the most significant sources of problems for the project, and
are:
countries.
-48-
"spelled word" form. The "greek letters" have been entered into a
follows:
subscript (SUB- )
superscript (SUP- )
a. Symbol
b. Definition
format:
-49-
Definitions of the symbols were simplified as far as possible, and
01 Compression Members
02 Built-Up Members
03 Beams
OS Beam-Columns
06 Frames
07 Arches
08 Triangulated Structures
09 Tubular Structures
10 Shells
11 Cold-Formed Members
12 Composite Members
of a symbol:
-50-
A Australia
E East Europe
J Japan
N North America
w West Europe
than one symbol exists for the same definition. This should result in
one symbol being selected for use in the "Master Guide" for each unique
-51-
Symbols that have been provisionally eliminated from the list are
recommended for inclusion in the "Master Guide", but were not taken
from any of the specified source documents, are shown with a ">"
The final version of the "Master Guide to Symbols" could take QD.g_
same symbol may have more than one definition for different
chapter topics.
-52-
listed for different chapter topics.
a power.
complete glossary of terms, special care must be taken to avoid the use
-53-
In the case of units, these should be non-dimensionalized wherever
provided.
identify the major stability aspects that are covered by the relevant
and
Appendix 6.
-54-
5.6.4 Format
indexing system.
that the general provisions and design requirements, the chapter topics
-55-
and the characteristic topics will be listed vertically and the
stages, it is evident that the first instance where this section of the
document would be used will be during the comparison stage. The index
matrix would clearly indicate the extent of the topical coverage for
suggested that the Chapter Editors should follow the pattern that had
The above suggestion forms the basis for a more effective format
-56-
"reference column" on the right-hand side of the provision or
"Compression Members".
been fully presented for more than one specification, the comparison
-57-
between the corresponding provisions. In the case where a
should be dealt with in the same sequence in which they were presented,
index matrix.
Where two or more specifications from the same region cover the
comparison.
-58-
the particular stability problem being considered in addition to total
than confrontation.
Editors was not achieved, the immense value of such an opportunity for
present.
-59-
explanations are attempted. The explanations should follow the same
comparisons and explanations which should have been performed for each
characteristic topic.
-60-
design study that was carried out by Konishi et al. (1969). The
The page format that has been used for the samples given in
accessible manner.
user's requirements.
-61-
file would be identified by means of the same codes used in the index
-62-
6. THE VALUE OF A RENEWED EFFORT
that could be derived from the new edition are given below:
-63-
approaches provide the most soundly-based means of satisfying
instability.
conducted, or
-64-
require further investigation by research workers. Such investigations
knowledge,
By the same token the Report will provide a basis by which those
that are applicable to types of structures other than those with which
-65-
how that specification deals with stability problems.
state of the world's stability design practice and should identify the
-66-
7. FUTURE WORK
such a document is always dependent upon how current the contents are,
(Task Group 11) could well be the best agency to take on this
responsibility.
One of the major objectives of the renewed effort stated that the
substantial amount of time and effort that will have been invested in
-67-
regions that have not been covered by the project to date, but that are
second edition would provide the framework for making the comparison.
7.2 Computerization
-68-
created for each cell of the index and comparison matrices. These
files would then be incorporated into a database that would use the
c. specification title
d. cell number
-69-
topics that are appropriate to to the selected chapter
It should also be possible to enter a key word or phrase for which the
topic.
-70-
The computerized World View Report should include auxiliary files
that could provide the user with rapid access to the nomenclature, the
further detail is required. This could be done at any place within the
its definition, the program should access the auxiliary file containing
printed form. This will undoubtedly affect the ease with which
save the user a considerable amount of time and effort in locating this
need for the user to become familiar with the organization of the
-71-
7.3 Application of Knowledge Systems
application.
interfacing. The aim of the system would be to deal with large volumes
of data without subjecting the user to long response times. Th~ system
-72-
Stability provisions are generally well defined and always exist
one way, would the development of the knowledge base encounter any
Lyons, 1986).
-73-
7.3.3 Evaluation of Specification Provisions
l.
It should be possible for the user to ask the system why a particular
particular aspect.
that could be encountered and under what conditions they would occur.
-74-
Ultimately it may even be possible that a knowledge system could
and more difficult for human experts to assimilate the vast quantities
-75-
8. S~Y
overcome the many problems that are associated with instability failure
research trends. There are also aspects of stability theory where the
these do not identify the fundamental reasons for any differences that
-76-
The original "World View" project, undertaken jointly by the SSRG,
EGGS, GRGJ and GMEA, did much to confirm the existance of a number of
provisions.
project with the specific aim of explaining the reasons for the
-77-
the variation in provisions, a number of contributing factors were
activities.
has been discussed in terms of both the cooperation that the project
will promote during its development stages, and the usefulness of the
-78-
The immense volume of material that would be contained by the
second edition of the "World View Report" makes it essential that the
-79-
WORLD VIEW CHAPTERS CONTRIBUTORS
(Second Edition)
-80-
WORLD VIEW CHAPTERS SSRC TASK GROUPS SSRC "GUIDE" CHAPTERS
(Second Edition) (Draft - Fourth Edition)
4. Plate and Box Girders TG-27 Plate and Box Girders 6 - Plate Girders
TG-14 Horizontally Curved
Girders
6. Frames
- TG-4 Frame Stability and 16 - Frame Stability
Columns as Frame
Members
7. Arches 17 - Arches
8. Triangulated Structures
4 - Plates
9 - Tapered Structural
Members
TABLE 2: "World View" Topics (Second Edition) and Associated SSRC Task
Groups and "Guide" Chapters (SSRC, 1987)
-81-
Country Production (Mt)
1. USSR 160.0
2. Japan 98.3
3. United States of America 73.8
4. China 51.9
5. West Germany 37.1
6. Italy 22.9
7. Brazil 21.2
8. France 17.9
9. Poland 17.4 E
10. Czechoslovakia 15.3 E
11. United Kingdom 14.8
12. South Korea 14.6
13. Canada 14.1
14. Romania 13.8 E
0 15. Spain 12.0
16. India 11.9
17. Belgium 9.7
18. South Africa 9.1
19. North Korea 9.0 E
20. East Germany 7.9 E
21. Mexico 7.1
22. Australia 6.7
23. Turkey 6.0
24. The Netherlands 5.3
25. Yugoslavia 5.3
26. Taiwan 5.2 E
27. Sweden 4.7
28. Austria 4.3
29. Hungary 3.8 E
30. Luxembourg 3.7
31. Venezuela 3.5
32. Argentina 3.2
33. Bulgaria 2.9 E
34. Finland 2.6
Others 17.5
E = Estimated Value
-82-
*Australia *The Netherlands
*Austria *Norway
*Brazil *Poland
Bulgaria *Portugal
*Canada *Romania
*France *Sweden
*Greece *Switzerland
*Hungary *Turkey
*Israel USSR
*Japan Yugoslavia
Luxembourg
-83-
NORTH WEST
REGION JAPAN AMERICA EUROPE EAST EUROPE CHINA AUSTRALIA
REGIONAL
B. KATO
f. IFFLAND J. HARDING
COORDINATOR J. SPlUNC:FIELr J. J. MELCHER S.F.CHEN N. TRAHAIR
CHAPTER TOPICAL
CHAPTER EDITORS EDITOR
lb Title
Compression M. Wakabayash J.J. Melcher ~.Z.Wei
1 Members L. Tall G.W. Schulz .W.Zhao R. Rridge G.W. Schulz
G.E. Belskij R.K.Fe
Built-up :r.Suzuki z. Razzaq J.J. Melcher J. Chen R. Bridge
2 Members B. Johnston L. Finzi L. Finzi
T. Ogawa G.E. Belskij
Y. Fukumoto H.E. Goeben
3 Beams T. Galambos J. Lindner Z.B.Xia S. Kit iporncha Y. Fukumoto
J. Sakamoto H.D. Glass
Plate and F. Nishino H. Skaloud X.H. Ren N. Murray
4 A. Ostapenko P. Dubas A. Ostapenko
Box Girders s. Komatzu J. Djubek X. L. Liu
K. Takanashi D. Mateescu S .F .Chen
5 Beam-Columns
T. Nakamura
w. F. Chen D. Nethercot I. Caraba
Z .Y .Shen M. Bradford D. Nethercot
B.K.He
I
D. Anderson
00
.p.
6 Frames s. Morino L. w. Lu ~f. Ivanyi H.B. Wu R. Bridge L.W. Lu
I -
7 Arches s. Kuranishi s. Vinnakota L. Kollar (None) N. Trahair s. Kuranishi
Triangulated P. Dubas
8 Structures
Tubular
H. Akiyama K. Buchert
c. Urbano
J. !iouty
"'D.· Ivanvi
Mateescu
Z.T. Guo L. Schmidt c. Urbano
1
Cold-Formed
Members
T. Suzuki
T. Ono T. Pekoz J. ,.. Stark
J. J. Melcher
v. Gioncu
S.J. Wang G.Hancock
Z.O.Zhan11
J.W. Stark
TABLE 5: Editors and Coordinators for the Second Edition of the "World View Report"
WORLD VIEW CHAPTERS APPLICABLE REFERENCE STANDARDS
(Second Edition)
GENERAL TOPICS
a Limits of
Applicability
b Material
1 COMPRESSION MEMBERS
b. Width/Thickness
Ratio
c. Column Strength lc-AISC-86 lc-CSA-74
d. Maximum slenderness
Ratio
2 BUILT-UP MEMBERS
a. Column Strength
b. Shear Strength
TABLE 6: Sample of Index Matrix for Use with the Second Edition of the
"World View Report"
-85-
WORLD VIEW CHAPTERS AUST· JAPAN CHINA EAST NORTH WEST INTER-
(Second Edition) RALIA EUROPE AMERICA EUROPE NATIONAL
Code Topic c w c 1 , c w c w c w c w c w
GENERAL TOPICS
a Limits of
Applicability
b Material
1 COMPRESSION MEMBERS
lb. Width/Thickness
Ratio
lc. Column Strength X X
2 BUILT-UP MEMBERS
TABLE 7: Sample of Comparison Matrix for Use with the Second Edition
of the "World View Report"
-86-
REFERENCES
AISC, 1986
Load and Resistance Factor Design Specification for Structural Steel
Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago.
CEC, 1983
Eurocode No. 3: Common Unified Rules for Steel Structures (Draft),
Commission of the European Communities, November, Brussels.
-87-
CMEA, 1976
Steel Structures, Design Specifications (Draft) - SEV 384/76
CRCJ, 1979
Handbook of Structural Stability, Column Research Committee of
Japan, Corona Publishing Co. Ltd., Tokyo.
CTICM, 1984
Stability of Metal Structures, 3rd International Colloquium, Paris,
November 16-17, 1983, Final Report, Centre Technique Industriel
de la Construction Metallique, Paris.
EGGS, 1976
Manual on the Stability of Steel Structures, Introductory Report of
the 2nd International Colloquium on Stability, European
Convention for Constructional Steelwork, (Edited by
D. Sfintesco), Paris.
EGGS, 1976
2nd International Colloquium on Stability, Tokyo, September 9,
Preliminary Report, (Edited by B. Kato), Gakujutsu Bunken
Fukyu-Kai Publishers, Tokyo.
EGGS, 1977
Stability of Steel Structures, 2nd International Colloquium on
Stability, Liege, April 13-15, (Edited by Ch. Massonnet),
Preliminary and Final Reports.
Eibl, G. ,1985
Current Work on Expert Systems and Natural Language Processing at
Siemens, Artificial Intelligence: Towards Practical Application,
(Edited by T. Bernold and G. Albers), Elsevier Science
Publishers B.V.
-88-
Ellingwood, B., Galambos, T.V., MacGregor, J.G. and Cornell, C.A., 1980
Development of a Probability Based Load Criterion for American
National Standard A58 - Building Code Requirements for Minimum
Design Loads in Buildings and Other Structures, NBS Special
Publication 577, June, US Dept. of Commerce, National Bureau of
Standards, Washington, D.C.
-89-
Iffland, J.S.B., 1976
Stability of Steel Building Frames, Introductory Report to the 2nd
International Colloquium on Stability, (Edited by D. Sfintesco),
European Convention for Constructional Steelwork, Paris.
IISI, 1987
STEELSTATS, Steel Times, Vol. 215, No.2, February, International
Iron and Steel Institute.
ISE, 1984
The EuroCodes - An Introduction, The Structural Engineer, 62A, No.
10, p 322, October, Institution of Structural Engineers, London.
lSI, 1964
National Steel Specifications, Report of the Proceedings of the
Annual General Meeting of the Iron and Steel Institute, London.
ISO, 1982
Bases for Design of Structures - Notations - General Symbols,
International Standard ISO 3898-1976 (with Addendum 1-1982,
International Organization for Standardization, September,
Switzerland.
ISO, 1986
Steel Structures, Materials and Design (Working Draft),
ISO/TC 167/SC 1, International Organization for Standardization,
Kobenhavngt, Norway.
-90-
Kerensky, O.A., 1964
Specifications for Structural Steelwork from the User's Point of
View, Special Report 88, pp 123-138, The Iron and Steel Institute,
London.
-91-
Ostapenko, A., 1983
Plate and Box Girders, Proceedings of the 3rd International
Colloquium, Stability of Metal Structures, Structural Stability
Research Council, Toronto, May, Structural Stability Research
Council, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania.
SAA, 1981
Steel Structures Code AS 1250-1981, Standards Association of
Australia, North Sydney, NSW, Australia.
SSRC, 1976
Guide to Stability Design Criteria for Metal Structures, 3rd
Edition, (Edited by B.G. Johnston), John Wiley & Sons, New York.
SSRC, 1977
Stability of Structures Under Static and Dynamic Loads, 2nd
International Colloquium on Stability, Washington, D.C.,
May 17-19, 1977, Proceedings, ASCE, New York.
-92-
SSRC, 1981
General Principles for the Stability Design of Metal Structures,
SSRC Tech. Memo. No. 5, Civil Engineering, February, ASCE,
New York.
SSRC, 1983
Stability of Metal Structures, Proceedings of the 3rd International
Colloquium on Stability, Toronto, May, Structural Stability
Research Council, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania.
SSRC, 1986
Annual Report and Register, Structural Stability Research Council,
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania.
SSRC, 1987
Guide to Stability Design Criteria for Metal Structures (Draft), 4th
Edition, (Edited by T.V. Galambos), Structural Stability Research
Council, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania.
Yen, B.T., Huang, J.S., Patterson, P.J. and Brozzetti, J., 1969
Structural Stability Design Provisions - A Comparison of the
Provisions of the CRC Guide and the Specifications of AASHO, AISC
and AREA, Welding Research Council Bulletin No. 146, November,
New York.
-93-
ABBREVIATIONS
-94-
APPENDICES
-95-
APPENDIX 1: Standards Organizations of the World
PREFIX TO
COUNTRY TITLE OF ORGANIZATION ABBREVIATION STANDARDS
-96-
PREFIX TO
COUNTRY TITLE OF ORGANIZATION ABBREVIATION STANDARDS
. ...
-97-
PREFIX TO
COUNTRY TITLE OF ORGANIZATION ABBREVIATION STANDARDS
-98-
PREFIX TO
COUNTRY TITLE OF ORGANIZATION ABBREVIATION STANDARDS
-99-
APPENDIX 2: North American Design Specifications for Metal and
Composite Structures
AA, 1987
Aluminum Construction Manual - Specifications for Aluminum
Structures, 4th Ed., Aluminum Association, Washington, D.C.
AASHTO, 1981
Guide Specifications for Horizontally Curved Highway Bridges,
American Association of State Highway and Transportation
Officials
AASHTO, 1983
Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 13th Ed., American
Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials,
Washington, D.C.
ABS, 1985
Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels, American Bureau of
Shipping
ACI, 1983
Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete, ACI 318-83,
American concrete Institute, Detroit
AISC, 1978
.. ~ Specification for the Design, Fabrication, and Erection of Structural
Steel for Buildings, 8th Ed., American Institute of Steel
Construction, Chicago
AISC, 1986
Load and Resistance Factor Design Specification for Structural Steel
Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago
AISE, 1979
Guide for the Design and Construction of Mill Buildings, Technical
Report No. 13, Association of Iron and Steel Engineers
AISI, 1967
Design of Light Gage Steel Diaphragms, 1st Ed., American Iron and
Steel Institute, New York
AISI, 1974
Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Stainless Steel
Structural Members, American Iron and Steel Institute,
Washington, D.C.
-100-
AISI, 1976
Tentative Criteria for Structural Applications of Steel Tubing and
Pipe, SP 604-876-7-5 M-MP, American Iron and Steel Institute
AISI, 1977
Welded Steel Pipe, American Iron and Steel Institute
AISI, 1979
Design of Plate Structures, American Iron and Steel Institute
AISI, 1982
Steel Tanks for Liquid Storage, American Iron and Steel Institute
AISI, 1983
Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members,
American Iron and Steel Institute, New York
API, 1977
Specificat~on for Fabricated Structural Steel Pipe, 3rd Ed.,
API Spec: 2B, American Petroleum Institute
API, 1980
Welded Steel Tanks for Oil Storage, API Standard 650, 7th Ed.,
American Petroleum Institute
•
API, 1982
Recommended Rules for the Design and Construction of Large, Welded,
Low-Pressure Storage Tanks, API Standard 620, 7th Ed., American
Petroleum Institute,·New York
API, 1984
Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed
Offshore Platforms, API RP 2A. 15th Ed., American Petroleum Institute
AREA, 1985
Specifications for Steel Railway Bridges, American Railway
Engineering Association, Chicago
ASCE-WRC, 1971
Plastic Design in Steel - A Guide and Commentary, ASCE Manual 41,
American Society of Civil Engineers and the Welding Research
Council, New York
ASCE, 1971
Guide for the Design of Steel Transmission Towers, Manual No. 52,
American Society of Civil Engineers, New York
-101-
ASCE, 1972
Guide for the Design of Aluminum Transmission Towers, American
Society of Civil Engineers
ASCE, 1984
Specifications for the Design and Construction of Composite Slabs,
American Society of Civil Engineers, New York
ASME, 1980
Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, American Society of Mechanical
Engineers
AWWA, 1973
Standard for Welded Steel Elevated Tanks, Standpipes, and Reservoirs
for Water Storage, AWWA Dl00-73, American Waterworks Association
BSSC, 1984
NEHRP Recommended Provisions for the Development of Seismic
Regulations for New Buildings, Building Seismic Safety Council
GSA, 1976
Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures, S37-1976, Canadian
Standards Association, Ontario
)
GSA, 1917
Code for the Design of Concrete Structures for Buildings,
CAN3-A23.3-M77, Canadian Standards Association, Ontario
GSA, 1984
Specification for Design of Highway Bridges, CAN3-S6-M84, Canadian
Standards Association, Ontario
GSA, 1983
Strength Design in Aluminum, CAN3-Sl57-M83, Canadian Standards
Association, Ontario
GSA, 1984
Steel Structures for Buildings - Limit States Design, CAN3-Sl6.1-M84,
Canadian Standards Association, Ontario
GSA, 1984
Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members, CAN3-Sl36-M84, Canadian
Standards Association, Ontario
-102-
CSSBI, 1968
Composite Beam Manual for the Design of Steel Beams with Concrete
Slab and Cellular Steel Floor, Canadian Sheet Steel Building
Institute, Ontario
FHWA, 1980
Proposed Design Specifications for Steel Box Girder Bridges,
FHWA-TS-80-205, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
MBMA, 1986
Low-Rise Building Systems Manual, Metal Building Manufacturers
Association, Inc., Cleveland
NASA, 1968
Buckling of Thin-Walled Circular Cylinders, NASA Design Guide
SP8007, National Aeronautics and Space Administration
SJI, 1980
Standard Specifications for Open Web Steel Joists, Longspan Steel
Joists and Deep Longspan Steel Joists, Steel Joist Institute
SJI, 1980
Standard Specifications for Steel Joists and Joist Girders, Steel
) Joist Institute
SSRC, 1979
A Specification for the Design of Steel-Concrete Composite Columns,
Task Group 20, Structural Stability Research Council, Bethlehem, PA
SSRC, 1987
Guide to Stability Design Criteria for Metal Structures, 4th Edition,
Edited by T. V. Galambos, Structural Stability Research Council
-103-
APPENDIX 3: Applicable Reference Standards for North America
AA, 1987
Aluminum Construction Manual - Specifications for Aluminum
Structures, 4th Ed., Aluminum Association, Washington, D.C.
AASHTO, 1983
Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 13th Ed., American
Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials,
Washington, D.C.
ABS, 1985
Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels, American Bureau of
Shipping
AISC, 1978
Specification for the Design, Fabrication, and Erection of Structural
Steel for Buildings, 8th Ed., American Institute of Steel
Construction, Chicago
AISC, 1986
Load and Resistance Factor Design Specification for Structural Steel
Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago
AISI, 1986
Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members,
j
American Iron and Steel Institute, New York
API, 1984
Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed
Offshore Platforms, API RP 2A. 15th Ed., American Petroleum Institute
AREA, 1985
Specifications for Steel Railway Bridges, American Railway
Engineering Association, Chicago
ASME, 1980
Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, American Society of Mechanical
Engineers
BSSC, 1984
NEHRP Recommended Provisions for the Development of Seismic
Regulations for New Buildings, Building Seismic Safety Council
-104-
GSA, 1984
Specification for Design of Highway Bridges, CAN3-S6-M84, Canadian
Standards Association, Ontario
GSA, 1984
Steel Structures for Buildings - Limit States Design, CAN3-Sl6.1-M84,
Canadian Standards Association, Ontario
GSA, 1984
Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members, CAN3-Sl36-M84, Canadian
Standards Association, Ontario
FHWA, 1980
Proposed Design Specifications for Steel Box Girder Bridges,
FHWA-TS-80-205, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
-105-
APPENDIX 4: Sample Listing of Symbols
-106-
WORLD VIEW - SYMBOLS {Report No. 429.8)
-107-
APPENDIX 5: Sample Listing of Symbols (listed alphabetically
by definition)
-108-
WORLD VIEW - SYMBOLS (Report No. 429.8)
Listing of All Symbols (by definition) - List 4
-109-
APPENDIX 6: Characteristic Topics of Specification Provisions
-110-
Chapter 1: Compression Members
a. Column Strength
b. Effective Length
c. Width/Thickness Ratio (Refer to General Section d)
d. Maximum Slenderness Ratio
a. Column Strength
al. Laced Members
a2. Battened Members
a3. Stepped Members
a4. Other Members
b. Shear Strength
Chapter 3: Beams
a. Lateral-Torsional Buckling
b. Flange Local Buckling
c. Web Local Buckling
a. Slenderness of Components
b. Bending Strength of Plate and Box Girders
c. Shear Strength of Plate and Box Girders
d. Interaction of Shear and Bending
e. Compresion flange of bix girder
Chapter 5: Beam-Columns
Chapter 6: Frames
a. Effective Length
b. Empirical formulas for P-6
c. Second order analysis
d. Approximate estimate of stability limit load
e. Seismic effect
-111-
Chapter 7: Arches
a. effective length
b. trusses with laterally unbraced compression chord
c. maximum slenderness ratios
a. Column Buckling
b. CMS and SHS in Flexure
c. Braced and unbraced SHS in flexure
d. Width/Thickness ratios
e. Interaction between local and overall buckling
f. Combined loads
a. Plate elements
b. Columns
c. Beam-Columns
e. Structural Systems
-112-
APPENDIX 7: Sample Presentation of Specification Provisions
on "Compression Members")
-113-
SPECIFICATIONS AND CODES
JAPAN
AIJ STANDARD FOR STEEL STRUCTURES variable cross section may be converted into a prismatic
(see Fig. jl.l)
member which is capable of carrying an equivalent elastic
Equations giving the allowable stress in the allowable stress buckling load.
design approach are: For the lateral supports of compression members:
For A~ A: 1. The intermediate supports of a continuous com-
pression member shall be given sufficient strength and
stiffness to enable the member to maintain full
0t.1) load-carrying capacity, even if it has initial deflec-
tion.
2. Unless the exact computation is made, laterally
supporting members or frames shall be assumed to
For A> A:
be subject to concentrated lateral force equal to or not
less than 2% of the axial compression. Where a
01.2) compression member has a large initial deflection, or
where rigidity of laterally supporting members or
where A= v' 7r2Ej0.6uy and A= 1/r, I and rare effective
frames is small, the foregoing concentrated lateral
slenderness ratio, effective length and radius of gyration of
force and effective length of the compression member
the member, respectively. Maximum permitted value of
shall be increased.
A is 250 for compression mem~rs, in general, and 200 for
columns.
AIJ GUIDE FOR PLASTIC DESIGN OF STEEL
STRUCTURES (see Fig. Jl.2)
Equations giving the ultimate strength in the plastic design
Commentary-This formula is based on a tangent- approach are:
modulus theory. The proportional limit is assumed to be
ForO~~~ 0.3:
0.6uy to take account of geometrical imperfections and
material inhomogeneities. The factor of safety takes into Uu = Uy
consideration the fact that the experimental results scatter
in the range where A <:::< A. The factors of safety are 1.5 for
For 0.3 <~ ~ 1.3:
01.3)
a column of zero length and 2.17 for a long column. Uu = Uy[1- 0.545(A- 0.3)]
AIJ Standard presents provisions for members having
variable cross sections and lateral supports as follows. For For A> 1.3:
the purpose of design computation, a member having
1.0r---=-·"="-.---------
1. 01---.,-,_-_-
__-__-__-__-_-
__---
__ _ Euh~r
~ .... au AIJ Plastic
Oy Oy Design Guid~
0.5 Q5
---
0 OS 1.0 1.5 2.0 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
x=l.· PY.l
Tr{f'r X=.!.· py .l.
Tr{'l"r
Figure }7. 7 Fzgure }7.2
-114-
where X= (1/rr)y' ay/E ·A, and A = 1/r, I and rare ef- Commentary-The JSCE C.Qlumn-strength curve is a
fective slenderness ratio, effective length and radius of straight line which is cut off at A= 0.3 and meets the Euler
gyration of the member, respectively. curve at the stress aE = 0.5 ay. This curve corresponds
Maximum permitted value of A for columns is 200. to the strength of a column with large residual stresses
Commentary-The denominator 1.3 of the last equation such as in built-up members by welding. The values oljhe
in Eq. 01.3) is nearly equal to 2.17 /1.65, which is the ratio factor of safety increase from I. 9 for A :5 0.3 to 2.8 for A ?!:.
of the factor of safety in the allowable stress design of AIJ
yZ.
Standard for Steel Structures to the load factor used in this Guaranteed minimum yield stresses (N/mm2) for plates
plastic design AIJ Guide. of 16 <I < 40 by Japan Industrial Standard are 235 for
SS41, SM41, and SMA41, 314 for SM50, 353 for SM50Y,
SM53, and SMA50, and 451 for SM58 where 1 (mm) is
JSCE SPECIFICATIONS FOR STEEL RAILWAY the thickness of the plate.
BRIDGES (see Fig. J1.3)
Equations giving the allowable stress in N/mm 2 in the JRA SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAY BRIDGES
allowable stress design approach are: (see Fig. J1.4)
-115-
For SM58, SMA58: equation, that is,
A:$14: 11w=255 ] 11u/11y = 1/(0.773 + ~2) 01.14)
14 <A< 67 11w = 255- 2.06(A- 14) 01.12)
67 :SA: 11w = 1180000/(3600+ A2)
Equations 01.8) through 01.12) are obtained from this
column curve with a uniform safety factor of approximately
where A is the effective slenderness ratio. 1.7.
Maximum permitted effective slenderness ratios in truss Guaranteed minimum yield stresses for SS41, etc., are
members are 120 and ISO for main and secondary com- shown in the commentary to the preceding specification.
pression members, respectively.
Commentary-The basic column curve is obtained from AIJ STANDARD FOR ALUMINIUM STRUCI"URES
the theoretical weak axis buckling strength of an 1-profile (Draft form)
which has a maximum compressive residual stress of 0.4uy Design formula is similar in form to that for steel structures.
l
and out-of-straightness of 1/1000. The mechanical properties of aluminum alloys are duly
It is approximately expressed by the following equa- reflected in the formula:
tions:
For 20 < A :S A:
For A :S ~ 1 (= 1):
_ _uul 11y = I - 0.136~- 0.300~ 2 (1.1 )
3
For X> A1:
11u/11y = 1.276- 0.888~ + 0.176~2 01.15)
where For A> A:
~=J.../uy{ 1-a
11w = 11y
7r VE r
The first equation of Eq. 01.13) is replaced by two straight
2.25 (it
lines for covering larger residual stresses than assumed where a and A are specified according to the grades of
above and the second equation is replaced by a simpler aluminum alloys.
-116-
APPENDIX 8: Sample Presentation of Specification Provisions
(second edition)
-117-
COMPRESSION MEMBERS 1
Effective Length a
NORTH AMERICA
AISC Load and Resistance Factor Design Specification, 1986
-118-
COMPRESSION MEMBERS 1
Effective Length a
NORTH AMERICA
AISC Load and Resistance Factor Design Specification, 1986
.,.,
I I
I I I
I I
-119-
COMPRESSION MEMBERS 1
Effective Length a
NORTH AMERICA
AISC Load and Resistance Factor Design Specification, 1986
c. K c. c. K
. c.
.
10.0
s.o
50..,]
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.9
50.0
10.0
s.o
3.0
2.0
.~~
50.0
30.0
200
20.0
10.0
s.o
4.0
100.0
50.0
30.0
20.0
-120-
COMPRESSION MEMBERS 1
Effective Length a
NORTH AMERICA
AISC Load and Resistance Factor Design Specification, 1986
-121-
COMPRESSION MEMBERS l
Effective Length a
NORTH AMERICA
AISC Load and Resistance Factor Design Specification, 1986
REFERENCES
AISC, 1986a
Load and Resistance Factor Design Specification for Structural
Steel Buildings, American Institute of steel Construction, Inc.,
September, Chicago, Illinois.
AISC, 1986b
commentary on the Load and Resistance Factor Design Specification
for structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel
Construction, Inc., September~ Chicago, Illinois.
AISC, 1986c
Manual of steel Construction - Load & Resistance Factor Design,
First Edition, American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc.,
September, Chicago, Illinois.
·Disque, R.O., 1973
Inelastic K-Factor in Design, AISC Engineering Journal, 2nd. Qtr.
Galambos, T.V.G., 1960
Influence of Partial Base Fixity on Frame stability, ASCE Journal
of the Structural Division, Vol. 86, No. ST5, May.
Johnston, B.G., Ed., 1976
Guide to Stability Design criteria for Metal structures, Third
Edition, Structural Stability Research Council, John Wiley &
Sons, New York.
Yura, J.A., 1971
The Effective Length of Columns in Onbraced Frames, AISC
Engineering Journal, April.
-122-
COMPRESSION MEMBERS 1
Effective Length a
NORTH AMERICA
CSA Standard S16.1-1974
-123-
COMPRESSION MEMBERS l
Effective Length a
NORTH AMERICA
CSA Standard 516.1-1974
.... ~ ~ 1'
I
I '
~~
\
\
I
~ ~ :!~
I
I
I
I
i G~ :t I
I
I
Buckled shape of column ' I
I I
I
''
I I I
I I I I
I
is shown by dashed line ' I I I
I
I
' I I I I
' I I I I I
'. \ I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
....... / ,.,, I
"f _t
,~
.6 ~
t
Theoretical K value 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
Recommended desiiJI
value when ideal condl· 0.65 0.80 1.0 1.2 2.0 2.0
tions are approximated
-124-
COMPRESSION MEMBERS 1
Effective Length a
NORTH AMERICA
CSA Standard 516.1-1974
.., GA GB GA
.., GB
e
1.0 e
50.0
10.0 100.0
50.0
~8 100.0
50.0
l:~
3.
0.9 3.0
30.0
20.0
5.0
4.0
30.0
20.0
2.0 2.0
1.0
8.3
1.0
0.9
0.8
u
10.0
6.0
5.0
3.0 10.0
18
7.0
6.0
5.0
0.7 0.7
0.6 0.6 4.0 2.0 4.0
0.5 0.5
3.0 5.0
0.4 0.4
0.3 0.3 2.0 2.0
1.5
0.2 0.2
1.0 1.0
0.1 0.1
0 5 0 0 1 1.0 0
(a I
Sidesway Prl¥tftted
lbl
Sldoswa ......,.....
4.3 This is based on the assumption that all columns Appendix c
in the portion of the framework considered reach C2 p4-16
their individual critical loads simultaneously. In
the usual building frame not all columns would be
loaded so as to simultaneously reach their
buckling loads, and thus some conservatism is
introduced in the interest of simplification.
4.4 The equations upon which the nomographs are based Appendix c
are: C3 p4-16
a. Sidesway prevented:
b. Sidesway permitted:
7r/K
tan 71'/K
-125-
COMPREaSION ME:;-!BERS l
Effective Length a
NORTH AMERICA.
CSA Standard 516.1-1974
-126-
COMPRESSION MEMBERS l
Effective Length a
NORTH AMERICA
CSA Standard S16.1-1974
REFERENCES
CSA, 1974
steel structures tor Buildings - Limit States Design, CSA Standard
S16.1-1974, Canadian Standards Association, December, Rexdale,
Ontario.
CISC, 1974
commentary on CSA standard S16.1-1974, Canadian Institute of Steel
Construction, Willowdale, Ontario.
CISC, 1978
Limit States Design Steel Manual, First Edition, Canadian
Institute of Steel Construction, May, Willowdale, Ontario.
Johnston, B.G., Ed., 1976
Guide to Stability Design criteria tor Metal Structures, Third
Edition, Structural Stability Research Council, John Wiley &
Sons, New York.
Tall, L. et al., 1964
Structural Steel Design, The Ronald Press Company, New York
-127-
COMPRESSION MEMBERS l
Column Strength c
NORTH AMERICA
AISC Load and Resistance Factor Design Specification, 1986
where,
For Xc ~ 1.5
(E2.2)
f cr [0.877]f
x2 v (E2.3)
c
where Xc KLJi!
uE
(E2.4)
For ~ ~ 4.71~
(C-E2-2)
-128-
COMPRESSION MEMBERS 1
Column Strength c
NORTH AMERICA
AISC Load and Resistance Factor Design Specification, 1986
> 4.71~
For KL
r
2
0. 877w- E
f (C-E2-3)
cr =
(KI;) 2
3.2 Formulas E2-2 and E2-3 are based on a reasonable Commentary
conversion of research data into design equations. E2 p6-155
Conversion of the allowable stress design (ASD) (Johnston,
equations, based on SSRC research was found to be 1976)
cumbersome for two reasons. The first was the
nature of the ASD variable safety factor.
Secondly, the difference in philosophical origins
of the two design procedures requires an
assumption of a live load to dead load ratio,
LL/DL. Since all LL/DL ratios could not be
considered, a value of approximately 1.1 at Xc
equal to 1.0 was used to calibrate the exponential
equation for columns with the lower range of X
against the appropriate ASD provision. The c
coefficient with the Euler equation was obtained
by equating the two equations at the common X of
1.5. c
Curve IP
-$ A242, Rollod, L
j A514, Aolled,LaH
A514, Welded, FC,L
Hybrid,A514 Aanqu,L.
~
-j:A36. Rollod, L -'z A514, Weldod, UM, L
! A 36, Welded, FC, L. 8 H
A572 (501, Weldod, FC, L8H
~0.5 A441, V/eldod, FC BUM, H
Hybrid. A441 Flonqet, FC 8 UM, L
1
0 0.5 1.0
c = KL~
X
r~J(
-129-
COMPRESSION MEMBERS 1
Column Strength c
NORTH AMERICA
AISC Load and Resistance Factor Design Specification, 1986
-130-
COMPRESSION MEMBERS 1
Column Strength c
NORTH AMERICA
AISC Load and Resistance Factor Design Specification, 1986
REFERENCES
AISC, 1986a
Load and Resistance Factor Design Specification for structural
Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc.,
September, Chicago, Illinois.
AISC, 1986b
Commentary on the Load and Resistance Factor Design Specification
for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel
Construction, Inc., September, Chicago, Illinois.
AISC, 1986c
Manual of steel Construction - Load ' Resistance Factor Design,
First Edition, American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc.,
September, Chicago, Illinois.
AISC, 1986d
Guide to Load and Resistance Factor Design of structural Steel
Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc.,
Chicago, Illinois.
Galambos, T.V.G., Ed., 1987
Guide to Stability Design Criteria for Metal structures - Draft,
Fourth Edition, Structural Stability Research Council, (to be
published in 1988), John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Johnston, B.G., Ed., 1976 .
Guide to Stability Design Criteria for Metal Structures, Third
Edition, Structural Stability Research Council, John Wiley &
Sons, New York.
-131-
COMPRESSION MEMBERS l
Column Strength c
NORTH AMERICA
CSA Standard S16.1-1974
where, ; c = 0.9
2
f cr = (1.035 - 0.202X c - 0.222X c)fy
-132-
COMPRESSION MEMBERS 1
Column Strength c
NORTH AMERICA
CSA Standard S16.1-1974
f
cr
where,
1.0 •
I
I
~--~V0
Pmox
-p; o.5
Ir
·1/1000 L
I t
0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
-133-
COMPRESSION MEMBERS l
Column Strength c
NORTH AMERICA
CSA Standard S16.1-1974
-134-
COMPRESSION MEMBERS l
Column Strength c
NORTH AMERICA
CSA Standard S16.1-1974
REFERENCES
CSA, 1973
General Requirements for Rolled or Welded structural Quality
steel, CSA standard G40.20-1973, canadian Standards Association,
Rexdale, Ontario.
CSA, 1974
steel Structures for Buildings - Limit States Design, CSA standard
S16.1-1974, Canadian Standards Association, December, Rexdale,
Ontario.
CISC, 1974
commentary on CSA standard S16.1-1974, canadian Institute of steel
Construction, Willowdale, Ontario.
CISC, 1978
Limit States Design steel Manual, First Edition, Canadian
Institute of Steel Construction, May, Willowdale, Ontario.
Johnston, B.G., Ed., 1976
Guide to Stability Design Criteria for Metal structures, Third
Edition, Structural Stability Research Council, John Wiley &
Sons, New York.
Keen, R.G. and Cran, J.A., 1974
Implications of Canadian Standards Association Standard G40.20 on
the Manufacture of Hollow Structural Sections, Tech. Bul. 15, The
Steel Company of Canada, Ltd.,· June, Hamilton, ontario.
-135-
APPENDIX 9: Sample Comparison of Specification Provisions
(second edition)
-136-
COMPRESSION MEMBERS 1
Effective Length a
NORTH AMERICA
Comparison (N7 and N35)
, c~ JJ
Buckled sh1pe of column
is shown by dashed line I
I
.~
I
I
I
~~
I
I
I
I
I
I '~ =-·II
I
I
I
l '<~
I
\
I
I
I
I
I
''
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I
I I I I I
\ I I
I I
N35
I
0.65
"f'
0.80 1.2 1.0
N7 AISC-86
N35 CSA-74
-137-
COMPRESSION MEMBERS 1
Effective Length a
NORTH AMERICA
Comparison (N7 and N35)
-138-
COMPRESSION MEMBERS 1
Column Strength c
NORTH AMERICA N
Comparison (N7 and N35) c
0.1
'
0.1
............
0.7
""!'-...
o.a ~
~ I\,
cPrnox
-- o.1
'
Py
0.4
O.J
~
0.2
0.1
0.0 0.1
Xc
1.0
= KLJ:i
'
1.1
~""'
2.0 2.5
rf" E
a •
"' ISitC •
N7 AISC-86
N35 CSA-74
-139-
COMPRESSION MEMBERS 1
Column Strength c
NORTH AMERICA
Comparison (N7 and N35)
•· -Probabilistic Multiple
Column Curves (1/L • Vi470)
---Deterministic Multiple
Column Curves (IVL.•VIOOO)
c = KL~
X
nJE'
LO < Xc s 2.0
3.6 < Xc
2. N7 gives an indication of the range of reliability N7-3.5
(S-value) that is obtained for the column-strength
equations. This is shown graphically below.
4.0.
ll ll
ll ll
ll ll
p_ ln(Rm/Om)
2.0 Jv,.l + Va 1
-140-
COMPRESSION MEMBERS l
Column Strength c
NORTH AMERICA
comparison (N7 and N35)
-141-
APPENDIX 10: Sample Explanation of Reasons for Differences in
-142-
COMPRESSION MEMBERS 1
Effective Length a
NORTH AMERICA
Why the Differences E:dst (N7 and N35)
N7 AISC-86
N35 CSA-74
-143-
COMPRESSION MEMBERS l
Column Strength c
NORTH AMERICA
Why the Differences Exist (N7 and N35)
N7 AISC-86
N35 CSA-74
-144-
VITA: Graham Steven Stewart
(Pty) Ltd. (DSE). While employed by DSE, the author worked for two
years in a structural steel design office, and then for three years on
During the two years spent at Lehigh University, the author held
Research Council (SSRC). His association with the SSRC provided the
basis for undertaking this thesis. The author has also held research
Structural Systems (ATLSS) and the Institute for the Study of the
course.
-145-