0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
20 просмотров2 страницы
The document analyzes a study comparing the effectiveness of generating vs. selecting chemical visualizations. The study examined how 118 high school students learned about hydrogen combustion through online tools that either had them: [1] generate drawings of the 4 combustion phases themselves or [2] select pre-made drawings from alternatives. It found that complex selection, where students considered alternative ideas beyond just what was shown, was more helpful than typical selection using only images from the material. The goal was to determine which approach - generating or selecting - best helped students distinguish between ideas and integrate new concepts with their prior knowledge to explain chemical reactions.
The document analyzes a study comparing the effectiveness of generating vs. selecting chemical visualizations. The study examined how 118 high school students learned about hydrogen combustion through online tools that either had them: [1] generate drawings of the 4 combustion phases themselves or [2] select pre-made drawings from alternatives. It found that complex selection, where students considered alternative ideas beyond just what was shown, was more helpful than typical selection using only images from the material. The goal was to determine which approach - generating or selecting - best helped students distinguish between ideas and integrate new concepts with their prior knowledge to explain chemical reactions.
The document analyzes a study comparing the effectiveness of generating vs. selecting chemical visualizations. The study examined how 118 high school students learned about hydrogen combustion through online tools that either had them: [1] generate drawings of the 4 combustion phases themselves or [2] select pre-made drawings from alternatives. It found that complex selection, where students considered alternative ideas beyond just what was shown, was more helpful than typical selection using only images from the material. The goal was to determine which approach - generating or selecting - best helped students distinguish between ideas and integrate new concepts with their prior knowledge to explain chemical reactions.
NO JUDUL JURNAL PENULIS TAHUN NAMA JURNAL TOPIK KAJIAN ISI
1 Learning from Chemical Zhihui Helen 2013 International Kondisi pembelajaran In the generation condition, learners used an online Visualizations: Zhang Journal of drawing tool to represent four phases of hydrogen Comparing generation & Marcia C. Linn Science combustion. In the selection condition, students chose four and selection Education images from among alternatives to represent the phases. For typical selection, there were eight alternatives (featuring images from the visualization) and students selected among over 130 possible sequences. For complex selection, there were 12 alternatives (identified from student responses in prior work on generating drawings) and students selected from among close to 12,000 possible sequences. Pertanyaan penelitian 1. What are the relative advantages of selection and generation for understanding hydrogen combustion and explaining novel chemical reactions? 2. How do high and low pre-test performers benefit from each condition? 3. How do selection and generation help students distinguish among their ideas? Kajian pustaka - Chemical reaction is a key concept in secondary school chemistry curricula. - In chemistry learning, generating drawings can help students distinguish among different representations (Kozma & Russell, 1997) Desain penelitian - There are 3 versions of the inquiry unit (generative, typical, and complex selection) - In this study, students added new ideas about chemical reactions with dynamic visualizations, distinguished among ideas through generating drawings or selecting among alternatives, and consolidated the varied views by explaining how chemical reactions take place at the sub- microscopic level. - In typical selection, they distinguished among images that occurred in the visualization. In complex selection, they distinguished among both observed images and common alternative ideas generated by students in earlier studies. - Thus, complex selection, where students consider alternatives that might be in their repertoire but not in the visualization, is expected to be helpful than typical selection. - In this study, we compare three ways to support the process of distinguishing among ideas. Generating drawings requires students to extract valid information from the visualization and write explanations that integrate the information with their existing ideas. Typical and complex selections require students to recognize promising drawings and to integrate their ideas as they explain their choices. Typical selection uses images from the visualization, consistent with many assessments. Complex selection includes images from the visualization and choices that represent student common confusions but do not occur in the visualization. Each of these approaches to instruction has potential for helping students distinguish ideas.