MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 22.5% 1. Classroom observation Quality
Education Knowledge knowledge of tool (COT) rating sheet
Services and content within and and/or inter-observer
Pedagogy across curriculum agreement form about
teaching areas. knowledge of content
within and across
curriculum teaching areas
2. Lesson plans/modified
DLLs developed
highlighting integration of
content knowledge within
and across subject areas Efficiency
3. Instructional materials
highlighting mastery of
content and its integration
in other subject areas
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) highlighting
integration of content
knowledge within and
across subject areas
5. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 2. Used a range 1. Classroom observation Quality
Education of teaching tool (COT) rating sheet
Services strategies that and/or inter-observer
enhance learner agreement form about
achievement in teaching strategies that
literacy and enhance learner
numeracy skills. achievement in literacy
and numeracy skills
2. Lesson plans/modified
DLLs used in teaching
highlighting learner-
centered strategies that
promote literacy and/or
numeracy skills Efficiency
3. Instructional materials
highlighting learner-
centered strategies that
promote literacy and/or
numeracy skills
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) used in
teaching
5. Results of assessment Timeliness
used in teaching
6. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 3. Applied a range 1. Classroom observation Quality
Education of teaching tool (COT) rating sheet
Services strategies to and/or inter-observer
develop critical agreement form about
and creative teaching strategies to
thinking, as well develop critical and
as other higher- creative thinking, as well
order thinking as other higher-order
skills. thinking skills
2. Lesson plans/modified
DLLs used in teaching
highlighting different
teaching strategies that
develop critical and
creative thinking and/or Efficiency
other HOTS
3. Instructional materials
highlighting different
teaching strategies that
develop critical and
creative thinking and/or
other HOTS
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) used in
demonstration teaching
5. Results of assessment Timeliness
used in teaching
6. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed 22.5% 1. Classroom observation Quality
Education Environment classroom tool (COT) rating sheet
Services and Diversity structure to and/or inter-observer
of Learners engage learners, agreement form about
individually or in managing classroom
groups, in structure that engages
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
meaningful learners in various Efficiency
exploration, activities
discovery and 2. Lesson plans/modified
hands-on DLLs highlighting various
activities within a classroom management
range of physical strategies that engage
learning learners in activities/tasks
environments. in different physical
learning environments Timeliness
3. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
Basic 5. Managed Classroom observation tool Quality
Education learner behavior (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services constructively by inter-observer agreement
applying positive form about teacher
and non-violent management of learner
discipline to behavior using the following
ensure learning- strategies:
focused 1. Providing motivation
environments. 2. Praising the Efficiency
learners/Giving positive
feedback
3. Setting house
rules/guidelines
4. Ensuring learners’ active
participation
5. Allowing learners to
express their
ideas/opinions
6. Giving equal
opportunities to learners
7. Encouraging learners to Timeliness
ask questions
8. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 6. Used 1. Classroom observation Quality
Education differentiated, tool (COT) rating sheet
Services developmentally and/or inter-observer
appropriate agreement form about
learning using differentiated,
experiences to developmentally
address learners’ appropriate learning
gender, needs, experiences
strengths, 2. Lesson plans/modified
interests and DLLs developed
experiences. highlighting differentiation Efficiency
in content, product,
process, learning
environment or others
according to learners’
gender, needs, strengths,
interests and experiences
3. Instructional materials
developed highlighting
differentiation in content,
product, process,
learning environment or
others according to
learners’ gender, needs,
Timeliness
strengths, interests and
experiences
4. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, 22.5% 1. Classroom observation Quality
Education and Planning managed and tool (COT) rating sheet
Services implemented and/or inter-observer
developmentally agreement form about
sequenced using developmentally
teaching and sequenced teaching and
learning learning process
processes to 2. Lesson plans/modified
meet curriculum DLLs highlighting
requirements and developmentally
sequenced instruction
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
varied teaching that meet curriculum Efficiency
contexts. goals and varied teaching
contexts
3. Instructional materials
used to implement
developmentally
sequenced teaching and
learning process to meet
curriculum requirements
and varied teaching
contexts
4. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)

Timeliness
8. Participated in 1. Personal notes of Quality
collegial teachers on
discussions that LACs/FGDs/meetings
use teacher and with proof of attendance
learner feedback 2. Minutes of LAC/FGD
to enrich teaching sessions on use of
practice. teacher and learner Efficiency
feedback to enrich
teaching practice with
proof of attendance
3. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)

Timeliness
Basic 9. Selected, 1. Classroom observation Quality
Education developed, tool (COT) rating sheet
Services organized and and/or inter-observer
used appropriate agreement form about
teaching and using appropriate
learning teaching and learning
resources, resources, including ICT
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
including ICT, to Examples: Efficiency
address learning  Activity sheets/task
goals. sheets/work sheets
 PowerPoint
presentations
 Video clips
 Module
 SIMs-Strategic
Intervention Materials
 Others
2. Lesson plans/modified Timeliness
DLLs with appropriate
instructional materials
appended
3. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
Basic 4. 10. Designed, 22.5% 1. Classroom observation Quality
Education Assessment selected, tool (COT) rating sheet
Services and organized and and/or inter-observer
Reporting used diagnostic, agreement form about
formative and using diagnostic,
summative formative and summative
assessment assessment strategies
strategies 2. Prepared lesson
consistent with plans/modified DLLs
curriculum highlighting appropriate
requirements. use of formative
assessment strategies
3. Developed diagnostic
tests: (a) with TOS
reviewed by superior; (b)
with sample
accomplished
questionnaire/answer
sheets
4. Developed summative
tests: (a) with TOS
reviewed by superior; (b)
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
with sample Efficiency
accomplished
questionnaire/answer
sheets
5. Developed performance
tasks: (a) with rubrics
reviewed by superior; (b)
with sample
accomplished rubrics
6. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)

Timeliness
Basic 11. Monitored and 1. Compilation of a learner’s Quality
Education evaluated learner written work with
Services progress and summary of results and
achievement with signature of parents
using learner 2. Formative/summative
attainment data. assessment tools with
TOS and frequency of Efficiency
errors with identified least
mastered skills
3. Class records/grading
sheets
4. Lesson plans/modified
DLLs showing index of
Timeliness
mastery
5. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 12. 1. At least 3 samples of Quality
Education Communicated corrected test papers of
Services promptly and the same 3 learners in the
clearly the same learning area with
learners’ needs, parents’ or guardians’
progress and signature and date of
achievement to
receipt
key stakeholders,
2. Minutes of PTA meetings
including Efficiency
parents/guardians or Parent-Teacher
. conferences in all
quarters with proof of
parent’s/guardian’s
attendance
3. Report cards with parent’s
or guardian’s signature in
all quarters supported by
minutes of meeting
4. Communication with
Timeliness
parents/guardians using
various modalities
5. Anecdotal record showing
entries per quarter
6. Other documents showing
learner needs, progress
and achievement
submitted to other
stakeholders

Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed 10% 1. Certificate of Recognition Quality

Education various related or Participation
Services works/activities 2. Certificate of Training
that contribute to 3. Certificate of Speakership
the teaching- 4. Committee involvement
learning process. 5. Advisorship of Co-
curricular activities
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
6. Book or Journal Efficiency
Authorship/Co-
authorship/Contributorshi
p
7. Coordinatorship/Chairper
sonship
8. Coaching and mentoring
learners in competitions
9. Mentoring pre-service/in-
service teachers
10. Others (Please specify Timeliness
and provide annotations)

JESUS A. MAUHAY ERNESTO D. LINDO

Principal I Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Rater Ratee Approving Authority