20Time Annotated Working Bibliography1 

 
MLA Citation: ​Use EasyBib to develop an MLA citation and copy it here. 

“The Relationship between Materialistic Values and Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors: A 
Meta-Analysis.” NeuroImage, Academic Press, 1 Oct. 2013, 
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0272494413000704. 
 

Link to source: ​Share a link to the source below. 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0272494413000704 

Summary: ​Describe the key points of the source, including at least three key quotes. 

 
 
First meta-analysis assessing link between materialism and environmental outcomes. 
 
 
Materialistic values linked to significantly weaker pro-environmental orientation. 
 
 
Strength of association similar for environmental attitudes and behaviors. 
 
 
Relationship moderated by publication year and population type. 
 
 
Implications for environmental psychology at large are discussed 
 

Assessment: ​Evaluate how the source responds to your research question. What does this source 
offer that other sources do not offer? Is the information reliable? How do you know? Is the source 
biased or objective? What is the goal of this source? 

Being more specific with my topic, finding reasons of why people act the way they act besides 
depression and self hate. THis source gives me a more open perspective of the world and 
psychology of the human brain.  

Reflection: ​How does this source fit into your research? Was it helpful? If so, how? How does it help 
to shape your understanding of the controversy you are researching? How can you use this source 
in your project? 

I feel that I can definitely use the information found in the article due to the fact it gives me a more 
open look in the world. I can give more in depth explanations as to why and how the brain works and 
why we choose certain choices that revolve around our circumstances.  
 

1
Adapted from ​Purdue OWL
 MLA Citation: ​Use EasyBib to develop an MLA citation and copy it here. 

Jim, Heather S. L., et al. “Religion, Spirituality, and Physical Health in Cancer Patients: A 
Meta-Analysis.” Cancer, vol. 121, no. 21, Oct. 2015, pp. 3760–3768., doi:10.1002/cncr.29353. 
 

Link to source: ​Share a link to the source below. 

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/cncr.29353  

Summary: ​Describe the key points of the source, including at least three key quotes. 

Although religion/spirituality is important in its own right for many cancer patients, a large body of 
research has examined whether R/S is also associated with better physical health outcomes. This 
literature has been characterized by heterogeneity in sample composition, measures of R/S, and 
measures of physical health. In an effort to synthesize previous findings, a meta-analysis of the 
relation between R/S and patient-reported physical health in cancer patients was performed. 

Assessment: ​Evaluate how the source responds to your research question. What does this source 
offer that other sources do not offer? Is the information reliable? How do you know? Is the source 
biased or objective? What is the goal of this source? 

I am trying to find other reasons as to why one would act the way they are. One reason is, religion, in 
which this article explains why religion takes in effect to mindsets.   

Reflection: ​How does this source fit into your research? Was it helpful? If so, how? How does it help 
to shape your understanding of the controversy you are researching? How can you use this source 
in your project? 

I feel like this was most helpful and I will have this article as my top piece to do more future research 
on.  
 
MLA Citation: ​Use EasyBib to develop an MLA citation and copy it here. 

Strozier, Charles B. The Fundamentalist Mindset: Psychological Perspectives on Religion, Violence, 

and History. Oxford University Press, 2010. 

Link to source: ​Share a link to the source below. 

https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=mWqLrJpSA4oC&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=psychological+
perspectives+on+religion+%22fundamentalist+mindset%22&ots=zqI9iEYXBG&sig=R0pIaNTSEOfdsPI
Mg5ePwx-6lEo#v=onepage&q=psychological%20perspectives%20on%20religion%20%22fundament
alist%20mindset%22&f=false  

Summary: ​Describe the key points of the source, including at least three key quotes. 

Examines fundamentalism from a psychoanalytic perspective. 

Addresses contexts as varied as the American experience, Al-Qaeda, the French Revolution, and the 
Nazis. 

Assessment: ​Evaluate how the source responds to your research question. What does this source 
 offer that other sources do not offer? Is the information reliable? How do you know? Is the source 
biased or objective? What is the goal of this source? 

Gives different beliefs from all around the world and how every origin has its own say so in life.  

Reflection: ​How does this source fit into your research? Was it helpful? If so, how? How does it help 
to shape your understanding of the controversy you are researching? How can you use this source 
in your project? 

Yes, it helps in many ways. It shows many perspectives from others around the world. 
 
MLA Citation: ​Use EasyBib to develop an MLA citation and copy it here. 

Issa, Theodora, and David Pick. “Ethical Mindsets: An Australian Study.” SpringerLink, Springer, 20 
Apr. 2010, link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-010-0487-0. 

Link to source: ​Share a link to the source below. 

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-010-0487-0  

Summary: ​Describe the key points of the source, including at least three key quotes. 

The aim of this article is to define and delineate an ethical mindset. In deploying an interpretive 
mixed-methods analysis of the Australian services sector, data were collected through an online 
survey on 223 respondents followed by focus group interviews involving 20 participants. The 
analysis reveals evidence of ethical mindsets in Australian business context, the components of 
which are identified as being aesthetic judgment, spirituality, optimism, harmony and balance, 
contentment, truth telling, individual responsibility and professionalism.  
“Currently, people are struggling with emerging 
issues such as uncertainty, risk, ambiguity and suffering 
(Arisian, 1993; Mansueto and Mansueto, 
2005). “ 
 
“The task some of those working in 
contemporary aesthetics have set themselves is to 
understand and characterize the relationship 
between art and ethics in a way that avoids the 
weaknesses of both instrumentalism and aestheticism 
“ 

Assessment: ​Evaluate how the source responds to your research question. What does this source 
offer that other sources do not offer? Is the information reliable? How do you know? Is the source 
biased or objective? What is the goal of this source? 

Shows the business world, how others can be do judgmental even in the work field. Like most 
articles, this one specifically is out of the country in Australia, giving another viewpoint of others 
around the world.  

Reflection: ​How does this source fit into your research? Was it helpful? If so, how? How does it help 
to shape your understanding of the controversy you are researching? How can you use this source 
in your project? 
 I feel that it suits what I am researching because it specifies my project even more, giving more detail 
in others emotions/thoughts/beliefs of the world and how those actions taken cause the effects 
afterwards. 
 
MLA Citation: ​Use EasyBib to develop an MLA citation and copy it here. 

Appleby, R Scott. “Religious Violence: The Strong, the Weak, and the Pathological.” 
Http://Practicalmattersjournal.org/Wp-Content/Uploads/2015/08/Appleby-Religious-Violence.pdf​, 
1988, practicalmattersjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Appleby-Religious-Violence.pdf. 

Link to source: ​Share a link to the source below. 

http://practicalmattersjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Appleby-Religious-Violence.pdf  

Summary: ​Describe the key points of the source, including at least three key quotes. 

The literature on religious violence is contested to such a degree that one 

is uncertain what to call the field of study. This essay argues that there is 
such a thing as religion and that under certain circumstances religions incite 
or legitimate deadly violence. Yet the relationship between religions, 
religious actors, and violence is much more complex than that. This essay 
surveys the main trends of a vast literature on that relationship, sorting 
it into three categories and several sub-categories, each of which explicates 
a different conceptualization and evaluation of religion and religious 
agency.  
 

Assessment: ​Evaluate how the source responds to your research question. What does this source 
offer that other sources do not offer? Is the information reliable? How do you know? Is the source 
biased or objective? What is the goal of this source? 

The relationship between ethnicity and religion can become a vicious circle. On the one hand, 
religions yield their independence and autonomy when they sacralize ethnic identity.  
This pdf really explains and breaks down the psychology of the human brain and how violence can 
affect society and mindsets. 

Reflection: ​How does this source fit into your research? Was it helpful? If so, how? How does it help 
to shape your understanding of the controversy you are researching? How can you use this source 
in your project? 

Just shows that violence is another factor as to why certain mindsets and beliefs are caused 
 
MLA Citation: ​Use EasyBib to develop an MLA citation and copy it here. 
Culture and Subjective Well-Being.” ​Google Books​,
books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=1A2siA19hKYC&oi=fnd&pg=PA113&dq=the+pursuit+of+happiness,+mindset&
ots=2pny0e2_rr&sig=cS7wRdyJwNGcijrxt1CqRd9GRy4#v=onepage&q=the pursuit of happiness, mindset&f=false. 

Link to source: ​Share a link to the source below. 

 https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=1A2siA19hKYC&oi=fnd&pg=PA113&dq=the+pursuit+of+
happiness,+mindset&ots=2pny0e2_rr&sig=cS7wRdyJwNGcijrxt1CqRd9GRy4#v=onepage&q=the%20
pursuit%20of%20happiness%2C%20mindset&f=false  

Summary: ​Describe the key points of the source, including at least three key quotes. 

The question of what constitutes the good life has been pondered for millennia. Yet only in the last 
decades of well-being became a scientific endeavor.   

Assessment: ​Evaluate how the source responds to your research question. What does this source 
offer that other sources do not offer? Is the information reliable? How do you know? Is the source 
biased or objective? What is the goal of this source? 

Explains as to why and how one can be happy, what can brings us as humans to an agreement.  

Reflection: ​How does this source fit into your research? Was it helpful? If so, how? How does it help 
to shape your understanding of the controversy you are researching? How can you use this source 
in your project? 

I can use this to show and explain true bliss in one’s life, no matter what the belief is.  
   
 
MLA Citation: ​Use EasyBib to develop an MLA citation and copy it here. 
“Global Mindset: A Construct Clarification and Framework.” ​Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency,​
journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1548051811404421. 

Link to source: ​Share a link to the source below. 

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1548051811404421  

Summary: ​Describe the key points of the source, including at least three key quotes. 

Variables such as complexity of global role and leader distance are also proposed to moderate the 
relationship between a global leader’s global mindset and outcome variables. The authors also 
discuss the impact of the proposed relationships and discuss directions for future research. 

Assessment: ​Evaluate how the source responds to your research question. What does this source 
offer that other sources do not offer? Is the information reliable? How do you know? Is the source 
biased or objective? What is the goal of this source? 

Gives a more open eye on cultures around the world. The rules and consequences of each 
ethnicity/religion/culture. 

Reflection: ​How does this source fit into your research? Was it helpful? If so, how? How does it help 
to shape your understanding of the controversy you are researching? How can you use this source 
in your project? 

I can compare and contrast with students and how they’re religion/cultures can relate, similar to this 
article.  
 
MLA Citation: ​Use EasyBib to develop an MLA citation and copy it here. 

Earley, P, et al. “Cultural Intelligence and the Global Mindset.” Advances in International Management 
The Global Mindset, 2007, pp. 75–103., doi:10.1016/s1571-5027(07)19004-5.   

Link to source: ​Share a link to the source below. 

https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1016/S1571-5027%2807%2919004-5  

Summary: ​Describe the key points of the source, including at least three key quotes. 

With the globalization of business, a relevant question is how might people deal with others from 
fundamentally different backgrounds (cultural, ethnic, functional, etc.)? Many authors (Rhinesmith, 
1992; Paul, 2000; Gupta & Govindarajan, 2002; Kefalas, 1998, just to mention a few) suggest that 
managers working in international contexts require a specialized way of thinking about the 
environment in which they operate, a so-called “global mindset.” 

Assessment: ​Evaluate how the source responds to your research question. What does this source 
offer that other sources do not offer? Is the information reliable? How do you know? Is the source 
biased or objective? What is the goal of this source? 

Shows how one should act and think in work. How the work field affects ones daily life and mentality.  
 Reflection: ​How does this source fit into your research? Was it helpful? If so, how? How does it help 
to shape your understanding of the controversy you are researching? How can you use this source 
in your project? 

Going off to college, and going to having a good full time job, most of the students need to know 
how to handle situations that can cause pain and an uncomfortable vibe from peers.