Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 1

Disappearance of the money had something to do with

embezzlement and conspiracy by staff members of both


Elnusa and Bank Mega which are Itman Hari Basuki (Branch
Head of Bank Mega), Santun Nainggolan (Director of
FinancePT Elnusa), IF (Directors of PT Discovery dan
Commmissioner of PT Harvest, HG (Directors of PT
Discovery, RL (brokerage), TZS (Staff of collections of PT
Who did it? Harvest)

The Elnusa Case on September 7, 2009 with a recept of a


cash flow from one of the banks in Jakarta. The instruction
received in Bank Mega was that the funds are intended for PT Elnusa is suspected of deposits embassled by Bank
'on call' (DoC) Deposits. Director of Complience and Risk Explanation from Bank Mega's POV Mega officer and PT Elnusa deposits at Bank Mega have
**Explanation from PT Elnusa's POV
Management of Bank Mega said that Bank Mega never disappeared. The Elnusa party went to Bank Mega to
received fund placement in time deposit, so there is no Case of Elnusa withdraw the deposit funds, but the Bank informed that teh
monthly interest payment. The document of fund itself comes fund was not available because it had been disbursed. The
from the customer, PT Elnusa, signed by Director of Finance depsot worth a total of Rp. 111 billion.
and President Director and handed over to the KCP Leader
of Bekasi Jababeka
Court of Justice stated that Bank Mega has been proven to
be unlawful for disbursing the deposits owned by Elnusa
withoou the owners' knowledge. PT Elnusa's deposits had
Both PT Elnusa and Bank Mega didn't carry out the principles been disbursed to other parties including PT Discovery
of good corporate governance properly such as Indonesia dn PT Harvest. The disbursement was done by
What the courts said? making false document signed on behalf of the Finance
transparency, accountability, responsibility,independency,
and fairness Conclusion Director of Elnusa, Santun Nainggolan and Branch Head of
Bank Mega, Itman Hari Basuki.

Lack of supervision by BOC of PT Elnusa so they were


initially unaware that their deposit money at the Mega Bank
had lost
The supervisory system and GCG system need to be Bank Mega as financial service institution which is obligated
improved either by Bank Mega or PT Elnusa in order to to act carefully in order to keep the public trust didn't do that.
reduce the opportunity to commit fraud and the sense of Bank Mega showed the act of negligence regarding Elnusa's
awareness of each individual associated with financial and Case analysis deposits disbursement by not checking the disbursement of
banking institutions is always to keep the code of ethics and Suggestions Elnusa's fund properly
profession

Fraud was done by top management, therefore the


supervisory system by BOC isn't effective enough to prevent
the fraud happening

The transparacy and openness by Bank Mega isn't


transparant enough

Вам также может понравиться