Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Instruction: Please evaluate the system using the scale below. Put a check ()
mark inside each box which best corresponds your rating.
SCALE DESCRIPTIVE RATING QUALITATIVE DESCRIPTION
5 Highly Developed The system is developed without any
revisions.
4 Very Developed The system needs slight revisions.
3 Developed The system needs minor revisions.
2 Fairly Developed The system needs major revisions.
1 Poorly Developed The system should be totally abandoned.
Comments/Suggestions:
Instruction: Please evaluate the system using the scale below. Put a check ()
mark inside each box which best corresponds your rating.
SCALE DESCRIPTIVE RATING QUALITATIVE DESCRIPTION
5 Perfectly Acceptable The system is acceptable without any
revisions.
4 Very Acceptable The system needs slight revisions.
3 Acceptable The system needs minor revisions.
2 Fairly Acceptable The system needs major revisions.
1 Not Acceptable The system should be totally abandoned.
Statistical Tools
To find out the quality level of Development of the system rated by the internal
experts:
(𝑓𝑜−𝑓𝑒)2
X2= [ ]
𝑓𝑒
Where:
X2= Chi-square
= summation
(𝑓𝑜−𝑓𝑒)2
X2= 𝑓𝑒
4.5 – 5.0 = (5) H/D Highly Developed The system is developed without any revisions.
4.0 – 4.4 = (4) V/D Very DevelopedThe system needs slight revisions.
3.0 – 3.4 = (3) D DevelopedThe system needs minor revisions.
2.0 – 2.4 = (2) F/D Fairly DevelopedThe system needs major revisions.
1.0 – 1.4 = (1) P/D Poorly DevelopedThe system should be totally abandoned.
To find out the level of Acceptability of the system rated by the respondents:
(𝑓𝑜−𝑓𝑒)2
X2= [ ]
𝑓𝑒
Where:
X2= Chi-square
= summation
𝑓𝑜= observed frequency
𝑓𝑒= expected frequency
(𝑓𝑜−𝑓𝑒)2
X2=
𝑓𝑒
(2−2.1)2 (3−2.1)2 (1−0.9)2 (0−0.9)2
X2= 9 + +9 +
2.1 2.1 0.9 0.9
4.5 – 5.0 = (5) P/APerfectly Acceptable The system is acceptable without any revisions.
4.0 – 4.4 = (4) V/A Very Acceptable The system needs slight revisions.
3.0 – 3.4 = (3) AAcceptableThe system needs minor revisions.
2.0 – 2.4 = (2) F/A Fairly Acceptable The system needs major revisions.
1.0 – 1.4 = (1) N/A Poorly Acceptable The system should be totally abandoned.