Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Natural law theory is one of the oldest theories among all the theories. Thus these laws are
popularly said to be god made laws. It is said to be emanated from supreme source as observed
by many jurist and philosophers. Legal thinkers have expressed diverse views on behalf of
natural law. Natural law philosophy dominated the Greece during 5th century BC when it was
believed it was eternal to man. Sophist calls it as an order of things embodies reason.
Natural law theory is a philosophical and legal belief that all humans are governed by basic
innate laws, or laws of nature, which are separate and distinct from laws which are legislated.
Legislated laws are sometimes referred to as “positive laws” in the framework of natural law
theory, to make a clear distinction between natural and social laws. This theory has heavily
influenced the laws and governments of many nations, including England and the United
States, and it is also reflected in publications like the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
codified the concept of natural law, and it played an important role in Greek government
Later philosophers such as St. Thomas Aquinas, Thomas Hobbes, and John Locke built on the
work of the Greeks in natural law theory treatises of their own. Many of these philosophers
used natural law as a framework for criticizing and reforming positive laws, arguing that
positive laws which are unjust principles of natural law are legally wanting. The entire history
of natural law reveals an attempt by the jurists to provide the concept and contents of natural
law in human existence.
There are numerous branches of this theory, some of which are quite complex. Many of these
branches use natural law as a framework for discussing positive law, and some of these
branches are actually built into legal systems. In England, for example, members of parliament
may appeal to natural law theory in settling disputes, in the form of the Fundamental Laws of
England, a series of basic rights set out by William Blackstone in the 1760s.
At the outset, it is important to distinguish two kinds of theory that go by the name of natural
law. The first is a theory of morality that is roughly characterized by the following theses. First,
moral propositions have what is sometimes called objective standing in the sense that such
propositions are the bearers of objective truth-value; that is, moral propositions can be
objectively true or false.
The second thesis constituting the core of natural law moral theory is the claim that standards
of morality are in some sense derived from, or entailed by, the nature of the world and the
nature of human beings. St. Thomas Aquinas, for example, identifies the rational nature of
human beings as that which defines moral law: "the rule and measure of human acts is the
reason, which is the first principle of human acts"
HYPOTHESIS
The researcher considers the following hypotheses:
1. Even after the use of natural law has been prevalent since ages, even in the present legal
system the natural law is used extensively. The modern judicial system have been
founded on the British Pattern the fine principles of equality, justice and good
conscience and natural justice occupy an importance in Indian law.
2. It is also finds a prominent place in Directive principles of state policy and the
fundamental right under Indian constitution in which various rights and duties are put
up by the framers. The principles against double jeopardy and prohibition against self-
incrimination embodies the principles if natural law theory
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
For this study, primary and secondary sources was utilized. Various constitutional provisions,
articles, e-articles, reports and books from library were used extensively in framing all the data
and figures in appropriate form, essential for this study.
(D).TENTATIVE CHAPTERISATION
(a) Introduction
(g) Conclusion
This piece of study would be very helpful for the lawmakers as it would explicitly state about
its utility in the present context. If found of not much relevance there is an urgent need to either
amend or repeal it. Law exists to sub serve social needs and therefore it is desirable that it
should change with the changing needs of society and life otherwise its results would be
contrary to the general belief ‘Law Is Dynamic
Bibliography
Books
Web Sources
1) Indiankanoon.com
2) legalservicesindia.com