Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Let us now apply the method to a more complex two rod system in Figure 1.3. We introduce a
preliminary step - idealization of the problem. For complex problems we are rarely if ever able to
analyze the base structure directly. We need to simplify it first.
Step 0: Idealization
The axial deformation behavior of a rod subjected to load is much like that of a
spring. where F is the applied force, A is the cross section area,E is the
Thus, we simplify the 2 rod structure to an equivalent 2 spring system as in Fig 1.4.
We can now follow again the five step process we defined earlier.
Step 1: FE Discretization
We decompose the structure into 2 elements each comprised of one spring. Thus we end
up with 2 elements and 3 nodes.
On each element we can obtain the local approximation by looking at the sum of forces at
each node.
Figure 1.5: General spring with stiffnes kp and under loads fip and fjp
or in compact notation
where [k] is called the element stiffness matrix, is the element displacement vector
Equations (1.3) repesents the behavior of any generic element. Let us now specialize it
for the two elements in our structure.
Element 1
For element 2
We need to put together (1.4) and (1.5) to get the total system behavior. Examination of
Fig. (1.4) shows that the forces at the nodes add up (we took care in setting up the system
that they were all in the same direction). Fig. 1.6 shows all the forces and their locations
and directions.
Writing down the sum of forces at each node as shown in Fig. 1.6 in matrix-vector form
yields:
or in compact notation
Now take a careful look at (1.6). We notice that this equation is simply an overlap of (1.4)
and (1.5) with addition of terms corresponding to the shared
Let us account for the applied loads first. From Fig. 1.4 the applied load of F at node 3 implies
-f23 = F. Since there are no applied loads at node 2, -f21=-f22=0. Modifying (1.6) we get
The first equation reduces now to -k1 u2 = -f11, a redundant equation in u2. Dropping it we are
left with
We are left with 2 equations for the 2 unknowns u2 and u3. Thus, the net effect of applying the
constraint was that of deleting the row and column corresponding to the displacement that was
constrained. This shortcut will work as long as the constraint is homogeneous i.e. ui=0. If a non-
zero constraint is to be applied then the procedure outlined above must be conducted. Note that
we did not have to deal with the unknown reaction at the wall f11!
Step 4: Obtain the Solution
We can solve (1.10) to get values for u2,u3. Let k1=2000,k2=1000 and F=10 then
Exercise
Use the approach above to obtain the displacements for the three rod structure shown below.