Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Chapter 16
Contents
16.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................ 2
16.2 ADVANTAGES OF ACTIVATED SLUDGE TREATMENT PROCESS ................................................................. 3
16.3 DISADVANTAGES .................................................................................................................................................... 3
16.4 COMPONENTS OF ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS .......................................................................................... 4
16.5 METHODS OF AERATION ....................................................................................................................................... 4
16.5.1 AIR DIFFUSION ......................................................................................................................................................... 4
16.5.2 SURFACE AERATORS .............................................................................................................................................. 4
16.6 OXYGEN DEMAND AND SUPPLY ......................................................................................................................... 4
16.6.1 COMPLETE MIX AERATION ................................................................................................................................... 5
16.6.2 TAPPERED AERATION............................................................................................................................................. 5
16.6.3 STEP AERATION TANK (INCREMENTAL FEEDING) ......................................................................................... 6
16.7 PARAMETERS OF DESIGN AND OPERATION ..................................................................................................... 6
16.7.1 MIXED LIQUOR SUSPENDED SOLIDS (MLSS) .................................................................................................... 6
16.7.2 SLUDGE AGE (MEAN CELL RESIDENCE TIME) ................................................................................................. 6
16.7.3 HYDRAULIC RETENTION TIME............................................................................................................................. 7
16.8 CONTROL OF NUTRIENTS IN ACTIVATED SLUDGE TREATMENT................................................................ 8
16.8.1 REMOVAL OF NITROGEN ....................................................................................................................................... 8
16.8.2 NITRIFICATION ......................................................................................................................................................... 8
16.8.3 DE-NITRIFICATION .................................................................................................................................................. 9
16.9 BIOREACTOR CONFIGURATIONS FOR THE REMOVAL OF NITROGEN ..................................................... 10
16.16.1 INTEGRATED APPROACH/CONVENTIONAL ............................................................................................ 10
16.16.2 WURHRMANN-NITRIFICATION-DENITRIFICATION ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS..................... 10
16.17 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................................................... 11
Chapter 16
16.1 Introduction
During 1913/1914, Arden and Locket aerated settled wastewater over an extended
period to produce activated sludge, which when mixed with wastewater and aerated,
would bring about nearly complete stabilization in few hours. The activated sludge
consists of a mass of bacteria intimately mixed with the dead microorganisms.
This technology has been applied in the treatment of wastewater and can be
described as dispersed suspended growth system.
The mixture of wastewater and the bacteria/microorganisms is called the mixed
liquor suspended solids or MLSS and is contained in a reactor.
The microorganisms are kept in intimate contact with the wastewater by mixing.
The mixing and the incoming wastewater constantly supply the organic matter
and oxygen for the microorganisms.
The mixing apparatus is also responsible for keeping the suspension aerated.
The microorganisms (bacteria) convert organic matter and oxygen to
ammonium salts, water, CO2, new bacterial cells and energy.
The microorganisms are constantly being washed out of the reactor by the
incoming wastewater and settle as sludge in the secondary sedimentation
tanks.
A fraction of this settled sludge (activated) is recycled back to the reactor for
continuity, thereby providing enough biomass to achieve BOD removal and the
other fraction, which is not recycled (excess), is wasted (Fig.16. 1).
Sedimentation
k
Bioreactor
Inflow wastewater (Containing MLSS) Final
Effluent
Air
Qwaste
Return activated sludge (RAS)
It produces an effluent, which complies for most of the times with final effluent
disposal guidelines
High removal rates of BOD and nutrients (nitrates, phosphates etc)
The process requires less land compared to other treatment processes.
The process is associated with less odours and health risks.
16.3 Disadvantages
Air
Excess
sludge
RAS
Air
Excess
sludge
RAS
Sludge age =total activated sludge solids in the reactor (kg) , days
activated sludge solids wastes (kg/days)
The sludge age varies from 2 days in high rate plants to more than 30 days in
extended-aerated plants.
= BODxQ
V x MLSS
The F/M ratio is the only the form of loading over which the operator has control. It
gives a good indication of the state of the plant without reference to other more
variable parameters. An operator has some control by adjusting the proportions of
sludge wasted and returned. Increasing sludge wastage rate will cause an increase in
the F/M ratio. The F/M ratio varies from 0.05 to 1 day-1.
V 1000
SVI ml/g, (i.e. ml/g per one litre of graduated cylinder and the
MLSS
1000 is to convert mg to grams)
Qe
Volume of
settled sludge
16.8.2 Nitrification
Wastewater enters the treatment plant with a greater percentage of nitrogen present
as ammonia especially domestic. The nitrifying bacteria (autotrophic bacteria) oxidize
ammonia to nitrate. Nitrification is the oxidation of ammonium ions via nitrate by
bacteria. The reaction is in two stages and takes place under aerobic conditions i.e. in
the presence of oxygen
The terminal electron acceptor is oxygen which is reduced to water under aerobic
conditions.
Nitrate
Organic nitrogen
(proteins, urea)
Bacterial decomposition
& Hydrolysis
Assimilation Organic
Ammonia nitrogen (NH3) nitrogen Organic nitrogen
(Bacterial cells (Net growth)
Nitrification
Cell-lysis
O2
Nitrite, N0-2
O2
Nitrification
De-nitrification
- Nitrogen gas
Nitrate (NO 3 (N2)
Organic carbon
Nitrite
16.8.3 De-nitrification
If the nitrates are released in the water bodies, they will be assimilated by plants
resulting in eutrophication. The removal of these nitrates takes place during de-
nitrification. For total removal of nutrients, this reaction will be very essential on
wastewater treatment. And for the reaction to take place, a suitable carbon source
should be present.
NO3 organic carbon A H 2O N 2
demitrification
The nitrate is converted to a nitrite and to gaseous nitrogen under very low dissolved
oxygen but in the presence of nitrate, a condition called anoxic. The influent
wastewater provides the carbon and the nitrate from the previous reactions
(nitrification) serves as the terminal electron acceptor and is reduced to nitrogen gas.
N2
Denitrifie
Q d effluent
Denitrification Nitrification
Clarifier
NO N 2
I
3 NH 3 NO3
Air
Anoxic
zone Aerobic zone
Qw
RAS
16.17 References
1. Ellis K., (1995), Unpublished Lecture Notes in Wastewater Engineering, Loughborough
University, UK
2. Gray N., (1992), Biology of Wastewater, Oxford Science, UK
3. Metcalf and Eddy, (1991), Wastewater Engineering, Treatment, Disposal and Reuse,
McGraw Hill, US
4. Schroeder E.D., (1971), Water and wastewater treatment, McGraw Hill, New York, USA
5. Peavy H. S., Rowe D. R., and Tchobanoglous G., (1985), Environmental Engineering,
McGraw Hill, New York, USA