Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

ENGINEERING FOR PEOPLE DESIGN CHALLENGE MARKING CRITERIA

Marking Criteria Mark Allocation

1a Demonstrate inclusion of the global 1. No consideration for 2. Some reference to 3. Description of the 4. Good description of the 5. Detailed description of
dimension of engineering the design’s the design’s design’s environmental design’s environmental design’s environmental
throughout the design process: environmental context. environmental context. Some context. Relevant context. Outstanding and
Outline the environmental context but little/no connections made to connections made to the relevant connections made
considerations and assumptions. connection made to the design. design. to the design.
the design.

Score out of
5: Comments:

1b Demonstrate inclusion of the global 1. No consideration for 2. Some reference to the 3. Description of the 4. Good description of the 5. Detailed description of
dimension of engineering the design’s economic design’s economic design’s economic design’s economic context. design’s economic
throughout the design process: context. context but little/no context. Some Relevant connections context. Outstanding
Outline the economic connection made to the connections made to made to the design. and relevant
considerations and assumptions. design. the design. connections made to
the design.
Score out of
5: Comments:

1c Demonstrate inclusion of the global 1. No consideration for 2. Some reference to the 3. Description of the 4. Good description of the 5. Detailed description
dimension of engineering the design’s social design’s social context design’s social context. design’s social context. of design’s social
throughout the design process: context. but little/no connection Some connections Relevant connections context. Outstanding
Outline the social/ community made to the design. made to the design. made to the design. and relevant
considerations and assumptions. connections made to
the design.

Score out of
5: Comments:
ENGINEERING FOR PEOPLE DESIGN CHALLENGE MARKING CRITERIA

Marking Criteria Mark Allocation

1d Reflection on how effective 1. Little / no 2. Reflection provided but 3. Some appreciation of 4. Good reflection of the 5. Deep reflection and critical
considerations of the global reflection provided. lacks appreciation of the the importance of the effectiveness of their analysis of the effectiveness
dimension have been throughout importance of including inclusion of the global inclusion of the global of their inclusion of the
the entire design process, eg. the global dimension dimension throughout dimension, global dimension
community consultation, ethical throughout the design the design process. giving examples of how it throughout the design
responsibilities, longevity of the process. could be improved. process. Give detailed
solution. examples of how it could
be improved.

Score out of
5: Comments:

2a Produce a reasoned solution: Outline 1. Little / no 2. Little thought given to 3. Some thought given to 4. Good appreciation of 5. Detailed appreciation of
basic advice on the implementation support the global dimension global dimensions global dimension aspects global dimension aspects of
(eg. construction and operation) of provided. aspects of aspects of of implementation and link implementation and link to
the design and any predicted implementation of the implementation of the to appropriateness of appropriateness of design.
difficulties. design. design. Basic design. Clear Well designed and
advice/support advice/support provided. appropriate
provided. advice/support.

Score out of
5: Comments:

2b Produce a reasoned solution: 1. Very little or no attempt 2. Some attempt to use 3. Some demonstration 4. Good demonstration 5. Detailed demonstration of
Students demonstrate methodical to use methodical methodical of methodical of methodical methodical assessment
assessment process to compare assessment process to assessment process to assessment process to assessment process to process to determine
design options against criteria to determine appropriate determine appropriate determine appropriate determine appropriate appropriate design. Well
determine preferred option. design. design. Poorly design. Well design. Well documented and logic
documented. documented. documented and excellently presented
logically presented.

Score out of
5: Comments:

Вам также может понравиться