Madre Dela Oscuridad Belgica Solvay Family

The missing children – Orphans of Liberty 10/03/2019 00(23
Home About this site Policies
The missing children Not one penny Search …

by James Higham • March 21, 2012 • 3 Comments to the EU
Churchmouse is right on the money

OUR
when he addresses the peculiar AUTH
LATEST
American penchant for non-mainline ORS
COMMENTS
Protestants to beat their children to a
Churc
pulp from infancy.” Pcar on
hmous
Happy March
He adds: e
9th, ladies
James
“This is another reason why I do not advocate pietistic and Trans issues
Also
holiness movements … Yes, some are said to be gentler than take over
here:
others, however, even some Amish and Mennonite International
communities consider extreme corporal punishment to be Twitter
Women's
necessary for the godly raising of children.” Julia
Day
Also
We can argue about smacking in another post but what is https://www.y
here:
probably beyond all argument is the level of abuse in the outube.com/
Twitter
dark and horrendous world of Belgium and Holland, not to watch?
Mike
mention Portugal and in fact, every single country now, from v=7H7Cnj8k
Also
what is being reported. BBc . Blonde
here:
woman tries
Alt
There is something very, very nasty in the hidden recesses
Pcar on News
of the state of Belgium, just across the border in Holland and
Anywhere,
just across the border in France, with Luxembourg thrown in.
as long as
There is some element or elements which, while they
it’s not in
certainly exist in the British Isles, the U.S., Portugal,
England or
Germany, Italy, Canada and Australia [and I suspect in South
Scotland
Africa] – in fact anywhere there is an elite in power – were
It's a non
peculiar to the Belgian case. Petitio
story Royal
n
It’s a country with no local government of note – in fact it’s an Fleet
artificial country, contrived from the Flemish and Walloons, it Auxiliary,

they don’t GATE
throws up nasty people like Rumpy-Pumpy and is home to S OF
both the EU and NATO, both nasty in their own way. You can have to be TRÈB
ES
see the word “nasty” being given a fair old workout here. Amfortas on
Anywhere,
This story has to begin somewhere, so why not with an
https://4liberty.org.uk/2012/03/21/the-missing-children/ Página 1 de 23
abuser’s tale? It was more or less a death bed testimony – as long as

Schaarbeek Police, Jacqueline Smolders interview [March it’s not in
18, 1997]. She started out by saying: England or
Scotland RIP Lt
“I am gravely ill and don’t see myself living much longer, and
Mind you, Col
that’s why I still want to testify in relation to the murdered and
the Arnau
missing children of which the investigation is ongoing at the
Spaniards d
District Attorney’s Office and the examining magistrate in
still have Beltra
Neufchateau.”
Harriers me
She spoke about Le Stanley, a club in Brussels that flying off their This is
organized sex orgies. It existed in the 1960s, until 1971/72. aircraft now
She was a member at the time and knew the owner, a Carriers. war.
certain Marcel Hofmans. Some of the other members of the
Voice of
club included Belgian executives of U.S. corporations as IBM
Reason on We
and Union Carbide. Hofmans and his colleague in Le Stanley
Ah. I Get It. owe
both worked for IBM at the time.
It’s A nothin
She goes on to describe the culture where the well-heeled Shakedown g,
could basically get what they wanted and that there was … walk
quite a cottage industry in it. So what, you might ask – Check out away
everyone knows about that. this Bozo, from

who tried to bad
It went on: produce EU
women- scene
One day, in 1969, this plane crashed over the province of
Namur with all the pornographic material onboard. The police
friendly now.
intervened and all the pornographic material was confiscated. games (and Euro
That evening, however, Marcel Hofmans had all the copies of generated nation
the movies in his possession, because of the intervention of mona on s will
apparently influential persons in the judicial sphere of Namur. Anywhere, trade
as long as with
Hardly just the actions of influential persons because there
it’s not in us
were many people who had to have colluded, not only to get
England or later
that material back to the man but to ensure there’d be no
Scotland no
investigation, no public enquiry of any kind.
Why didn't matter
Enter Mary Porsont: they ask the what.
Russians to
“In the half year I worked at La Piscine I did not see any
build them?
pedophile activity. But I did hear enough about the bizarre
they would
sexual preferences of so-called higher ups and that there
were possibilities to organize orgies with children. A certain
have
ARCH
Eric and Nina asked me to approach those higher ups who Valentine IVES
came to us at La Piscine and left their phone number with Gray on
offers of special evenings. Anywhere, Sel
ect
as long as Mo
Especially Nottebaert [small-time socialist politician who liked
it’s not in nth
SM] but also quite a few ministers turned out to be very
interested in those kind of evenings. At the union and the England or Email
Socialist Party I learned a lot about their sexual preferences. Scotland us
Elio di Rupo, for example, who had a relationship with Now Now, [chec
Spitaels’s son.”
stop worrying ked
Digressing for the moment to the story of Tristane Banon and about the weekl
DSK, the reason that her lot were amazed she took it so far Cabal of y]:
was that the whole leftist political culture was rife with vague thieves and contac
or no moral constraints anyway – so DSK having sex with his traitors torpha
lover’s daughter was seen as par for the course. What’s all ripping nsoflib
the fuss? This is reinforced by Lucy Wadham’s The Secret Pcar on erty@
Life of France, where she was married into the fashionable May’s gmail.
champagne left and described the dinner parties in some treachery? com
detail. @Mike
Cunningham If no
However, as is apparent below, this is not just a leftist thing All I see is a reply
but across all political divisions and social classes. In fact, whirling [chec
there is a political division which can be called neither right "Loading" ked
nor left – they’re just the elite and this behaviour is de rigeur image. Tell via
with them. Mr ticker]
Errol on Ah. I :
The story of the Bhagwan in Belgium was one where the
Get It. It’s A nouris
veneer of “we’re all adults freely exercising our right to
Shakedown hingob
behave as we wish” was peeled away to show something
… scurity
altogether more … well … nasty:
A black chap @gma
But more importantly, in April 1994, the address of this il.com
- I forget his
Bhagwan sect was changed to the Kammenstraat 29, 2000
name - stood
Antwerp. On
up one
About a year later, on November 27, 1995, police conducted Twitte
Mike
a search at this very same address. They were looking for a r:
Cunningham
person named Eric Mattheeussen, who had been accused of Orpha
on May’s
taking illegal photographs at a morgue in the aftermath of a ns
treachery?
rather tragic traffic accident. Mattheussen used this semi-
The 'real'
abandoned building as a storage or working place.
thing was TAGS
When police looked around and went to the first floor they also posted
found many boxes. Here’s a brief description of what was on 2016
inside those boxes:
AltNewsMedi All
“In these boxes we find amongst other things thousands of a's pages at building
https://www.a the
photos of children. These appear to be regular photos,
socialist
usually taken up front… In other boxes we find hundreds of ltnewsmedia.
paradis
pictures of corpses of children, often in the most hideous net/topical- e
poses. Many of the pictures have been made by himself; news- bureaucr
other pictures were made on order by other photographers. acy

general/the-
children
…
bruges- Cultural
Marxis
In several boxes we find child pornography. … Hundreds of group-article- m

magazines. … The lecture shows penetrations of often very Democra
they-dont-
tic Party
young children by grown ups, and also some very unusual want-you-to-
pedophile fantasies. … Pictures of deceased children in
Dona
read/. As ld
concentration camps… newspaper clippings of prominent
disappearances.”
john in Trum
cheshire on p
I’m sure the significance in that last paragraph hasn’t Ah. I Get It. Doomed
Econom
escaped you – we’re not just talking sex anymore but about It’s A
y
the bodies of children – snuff movies. You might like to look Shakedown Educati
the photo top left of that girl – she comes into the story … on
electio
further down. There are going to be names in this post. No If these
ns
suggestion is made that any name mentioned is in any way people want Europe
personally guilty of these things – they come from the games fear and
loathing
testimony which was collected at the time. featuring
feel-
non-whites, good
So again, take this or leave it:
why don't impa
The letter specifically mentioned “villa Westflier in Markelo” as they develop ct of
a place where abuse had taken place.” After looking around a them Prog
bit, ISGP reported that the Westerflier estate in Markelo had Amfortas on ressi
previous inhabitants with very close ties to I.G. Farben, that
Dichotomy… vism
after WWII the estate became a boarding school for young
Good job for Just
girls with emotional or behavioral problems, and … this estate
them that
blood
has been in the Schimmelpenninck family for centuries. We y
they didn't
described two present members of this family, including the think
Tweet their
associate of Salomonson … one member, a baron named about
remarks. The
Coen Schimmelpenninck (b. 1943). it will
West you?
There is a suggested justice
Pcar on
political reason for the law
Whingy-
abuse: and
whiny
Even Michel Nihoul has lickspittle orde
admitted that abuse killjoys r
networks are used for Fun, Lifestyl
blackmail in an interview e local
pleasure,
politics
with Der Spiegel in 2001: freedom, Nanny
“I control the government. excitement State
… Everyone has compromising dossiers on one another, to NHS
and
be used as leverage in the right situation. … this is the Police
happiness Politic
Belgian disease.”
banned by al
Very much a weapon to manipulate people in positions of the killjoy Correc
tness
power, to keep them compliant. Nihoul – the one who was puritans
propa
never convicted, even though he admits inappropriate again ganda
relationships and gangsterism, even though he was Public
servic
implicated by so much of the testimony, including that of
es
Dutroux. Protected again – by whom? Certainly the courts Public

ABOUT OOL
went soft on him. Why?
spend
ing
We are political
Marie-Jeanne Van Heeswyck, Annemie Bulté, and Douglas
and apolitical –
Re
De Coninck, ‘De X-dossiers’, 1999, p. 103:
some belong to ad
Immediately after the first arrest in the Dutroux case, parties, some
Connerotte had asked all police services in the country if they do not. Some
and
had ever done investigations in which the name Nihoul had are self- We
appeared. A very normal procedure. ‘I know that colonel
Brabant replied with a negative to Connerotte,’ Delmartino
professed ep
libertarians, Republ
tells. ‘This, while our third financial section in fact had worked
some are small ican
on three dossiers pertaining to Nihoul, among them SOS Party
“c”
Sahel.’ Resp
conservatives, onsibil
X11’s testimony: some classical ity
liberals – the Self
… As well as Michel Nihoul and a woman who was arrested
names are right
in the Dutroux case, XI named her procurer T., the lawyer and
varied. However
the burgomaster mentioned above, and a businessman from eou
we all have one
western Flanders and his son. XI could not establish any links s
between all these people, except the fact that she had met thing in
common, a love
pric
them on various occasions at orgies.
of personal ks
How far is this part of “the Belgian disease”, how far signs
liberty; that
of
influenced by NATO and the EU in that country, how casualty of the totalita
widespread across all countries is it? encroaching rianism
Slack
state as it seeks
The EU is not just culpable for its PC statutes and journalis
to micromanage m
regulations, which Nigel and Dan bang on about, not just for
a complete democratic deficit and as purveyor of lunacy and
our lives. [Link soci
hypocrisy at enormous cost and with enormous corruption
in main menu] al
and wastage, not just for grabs at various nations’ coh
sovereignty. With its approval, nasty groups like Bertelsmann esio
can get a German Health Department to distribute, n
nationwide, pamphlets in ever surgery, in every hospital, State
suspici
advocating paedophilia. It’s been tackled before at this blog
on
and here it is again. Techno
logy
I quote Canadian author and public speaker Michael O’Brien the
… who spoke to LifeSiteNews.com as follows: State
Tits on a
It is, he said, “state-encouraged incest, which in most civilized fish
societies is a crime.” USA

Victimh
The pamphlet advises parents to permit young children ood
“unlimited masturbation” except where physical injury Poker
becomes apparent. It advises: “Children should learn that warni
there is no such thing as shameful parts of the body. The ngs
body is a home, which you should be proud of.” For ages 4-6, You
the booklet recommends teaching children the movements of have
Got to
copulation.
be
Joking!
Another product of the BZgA is a song book aimed at children
You
of four and slightly older which includes several songs
literall
espousing masturbation. The song-book entitled “Nose, belly y
and bum” includes one song with the following lyrics: “When I could
touch my body, I discover what I have. I have a vagina, not
make
because I am a girl. Vagina is not only for peeing. When I
it up!
touch it, I feel a pleasant tingle.”
Four years old. An official pamphlet. Direct quote from the

pamphlet:
“Fathers do not devote enough attention to the clitoris and

vagina of their daughters. Their caresses too seldom pertain
to these regions, while this is the only way the girls can
develop a sense of pride in their sex,” reads the booklet
regarding 1-3 year olds.
Google Bertelsmann and it reads like an old and honoured

family firm of Germany.
Coming back to Belgium, the Church is also up to its neck in

it. Or the 2002 case, nothing to do with the elite but all to do
with people in positions of trust in the community. What sort
of message does this send out:
The shadow of paedophilia returned to haunt Belgium when a

court found 19 inhabitants of the same village guilty of
systematically raping or sexually abusing a girl of 11, who had
been prostituted by her father.
I’ll not gratify anyone with the finer anatomical details and to
those who deride the Mail sort of faux-outrage where many
would do that very thing they’re decrying, all I can say is that
this sort of thing is always possible, given a certain set of
circumstances. In a small town, particularly where the society
as a whole has had its moral compass lowered, in no small
part because of the actions of those supposedly above, then
the unthinkable can and has happened and just how are the
vulnerable to be protected?
Where’s the white knight?
Hypothetical – if everyone was having a turn with the kid and

there was no sense whatever of it being unsafe for you,
would you have a quick dip, no questions asked or would
something stop you, something perhaps in your faith which is

screaming, “Don’t do it, don’t do it, it’s a one-way path to
hell.” Or perhaps you have a young daughter of your own or
perhaps you just have a high moral compass anyway.
Would that stop you when all eyes were upon you and you
were now expected to take your turn … and if you did stop,
isn’t there now the fear factor on their part that you must be
prevented from telling? And isn’t it so that it just takes one
moral authority to say, “No, this is wrong,” and suddenly
there is the Lord of the Flies scene at the end, when the
party running along the beach to murder the last innocent
boy is stopped in its tracks by an officer in uniform who
appears as if from nowhere?
Which immediately makes every person who took a dip into

that girl now examine him or herself and no one wants to
know what they’ll find when they do that. So they continue
with the go-soft on these things and the rationalizing
justifications. They have to continue with it, don’t they?
That’s how complicity works.
It goes on and on and it needs complicity across a wide-

range of society. It needs the collusion of people in key
positions to enable it – bought people.
Police commissioner Georges Marnette played a central role

in these disinformation schemes. Both X2 and Nathalie W.
identified Marnette as an abuser in the network.
Once again, I’m not specifically accusing Georges Marnette,

I don’t know him from Adam. I am decrying the principle.
How does Dutroux’s wife, who’s never shown any remorse,

get released in 2011, having been sentenced, in 2004, to 30
years? How can she entertain hopes – dashed by the
French, thank goodness – that she can now seek asylum in
a French convent?
The central erroneous belief in the Dutroux case and one

which the public has been brainwashed enough to ignore – it
comes out in polls – is that he acted alone, a la Lee Harvey
Oswald or at least that his accomplices were there to assist
him personally in his crimes and only his, rather than how all
the victims see it – that he was but one of a vast network of
organized paedophilia, not only in that country but across
Europe, across the pond and in every part of the world
locked into the grid.
The cover-up and collusion caused 300 000 people to

descend on Brussels – the White March – to make the
people’s feelings known. There are two competing feelings
of outrage here – those people over there who wanted to get
to the bottom of whoever was responsible and to make
Belgium safer … and people over here on blogs who
castigate the mass hysteria whipped up by the media
whenever paedophilia is mentioned, in some ways quite
rightly, e.g. in the government seizing on the Soham murders
to bring in CRB checks and to terrify parents nationwide.
To those bloggers, whilst I agree with that, I’d still ask which
side of the fence you’d be on if there was a serial killer on the
loose in, say, London or wherever you are, he appears to be
connected according to testimony and the police, media and
courts simply go quiet on the whole affair?
The bottom line was that 300 000 counted for nothing –
those people were completely ignored and the [alleged]
whitewash went ahead. The removal of an incorruptible
investigator was the straw which broke the camel’s back for
most people:
Before he was sacked, Judge Connerotte had been

concentrating his investigations on a man he suspected was
the mastermind behind Dutroux’s abductions. Businessman
Jean Michel Nihoul was well-known in the 70s, when orgies
became a part of the Brussels nightclub scene. Nihoul mixed
with politicians and judges and today claims he has enough
information on important people to destroy Belgium.
The day after Dutroux’s last abduction Nihoul gave £10,000-

worth of ecstasy tablets to Michel Lelievre, the drug-addict
lackey of Dutroux. Connerotte suspected this was a form of
payment for the latest kidnapped girls and he arrested Nihoul.
Nihoul denied that he and Dutroux had ever met before June
1995.
Then a new witness came forward. Regina Louf, now aged

33, was, as a child, the victim of a paedophile ring. Nihoul,
she claimed, had been one of the bosses, and Dutroux was
also involved. She witnessed many sadomasochistic sessions
involving children and top politicians, judges and
businessmen.
She told the investigator she had witnessed the murder of a
15-year-old girl at the hands of Nihoul, Dutroux and six

others. She named prominent people, most of whom are still
alive today and all of whom, apart from Dutroux, are free.
Her confidential testimony was taken by a team of police.

When her story was checked, key elements of it were found
to be true. As soon as they reported their progress and began
to ask for search warrants, the team was suddenly and
inexplicably ordered to terminate the investigation.
That is a key point – X1’s testimony was never shown, in

terms of the detail of what went on or in descriptions of
where it had happened, to have been wrong. In fact it was
shown to have been quite accurate. She was all over the
place though with dates and times. The way the authorities
dealt with her was to send a spokesman onto national
television to assert that there was no paedophilia ring and
that the woman was a fantasist.
End of story.
And the sad thing was – it was the end of the story. The
whole thing died. The woman herself, Regina Louf, now in
her thirties, is bemused at how it was done. It was so
predictable in her eyes.
Solvay
Pause for breath. I didn’t come to this story via Dutroux. I

actually came to it through looking into the Solvay family and
The Little Gym, a worldwide children’s holiday camp
organization centred in Belgium.
Most pundits are well aware that the address of The Little
Gym was 5 rue Pletzer, L-8080 Bertrange, which has also
been the address, since May 1st 2004, of Itaca International,
a company founded by Patrick Solvay, shareholder of the
Solvay Group, manufacturers of Prozac, with Alexander de
Wit, the company set up on July 3rd 2001.
The former name of Itaca International was “The LifeSkills

Company”, which also belonged to Patrick Solvay.
The Grand Duchy of Luxembourg bulletin of 28 December

2001 listed Patrick Solvay as living in Château des Amerois
[1, Les Amerois, B-6830 Bouillon, Belgium]. Chateau des
Amerois is apparently accessible via Les Quatre Chemins
near the village of Muno in Bouillon. A hunting permit [pdf]
lists a Denis Solvay living at that address.
The castle features in the story of one Marc Dutroux and is

fancifully named the Castle of the Mother of Darkness, scene
of various goings on. Many reports list a chapel inside with
1000 points of light [and do check this link].
Four names closely associated are Solvay, Janssen, Lippens

and Davignon:
His [Davignon’s] family has intermarried with some of the

more powerful Belgian blue blood families like the Janssens,
Boëls, and Solvays. Together with his Solvay business
partner, Baron Daniel Janssen, Davignon was a long time
member of the ERT.
This post is not about Davignon but:
Together with his business partner Count Maurice Lippens,

Viscount Etienne Davignon was involved in setting up SN
Brussels Airlines, the follow up of Sabena, which went
bankrupt in 2001. Davignon also played a role in the Lernout
& Hauspie scandal, which centered around a company that
made by far the best voice recognition / language translation
software on the market (although it wasn’t perfect).
According to one of the founders of the company, Jo Lernout,

it went wrong in 1999/2000 when L&H started to buy up US
companies who were working for the CIA and the Pentagon,
especially because the L&H software worked almost the
same as the NSA’s Echelon spy system. The Wall Street
Journal accused L&H of fraudulent book keeping in August
2000 and the 2 founders, Jo Lernout and Pol Hauspie, were
arrested in April 2001. According to Business Wire, Davignon
became a director of Lernout & Hauspie in May 2001.
Dutroux made claims, which were discounted, about Michel

Nihoul and highly placed people in Belgian society but he
wasn’t alone in this. A succession of witnesses, many given
an X designation to protect them [already mentioned] also
accused the same sort of people.
They were also discounted because, by their very nature in

having been involved in this type of activity, there were
questions over their mental stability. However, it was a bit like
this – let’s say there was Count A, Prince B, Commissaire C
and Prince D. All are legitimately involved in business and
have many interconnections, including children’s charities.
They socialize together.
On A, half a dozen witnesses agree he’s a real beast, some

bring in B and C at the same time, one brings in D and A
together – that’s roughly the way it was – piecemeal and yet
the same names popping up the whole time.
For example:
V 151.511, May 14, 1997: “X1 signals that VdBogaert, Vander

Elst, Bouty, Nihoul, Bert (Albert & Joost) and Emile Dellaert
were present at the murder of Véronique Dubrulle.
Naturally, the testimony of all the X witnesses was savaged

by the representatives of those accused and in the case of
X1, on state television it was claimed that everything she’d
said was fantasy, as mentioned. However, that was undercut
by Gent Court, in 1998, which upheld much of what X1 had
said. The accused character known as Antoine [or Tony] then
had to rapidly change his story and claim it was all
consensual between a 12 year old X1 and him.
And so to other testimony
PV 117.535, November 19, 1996: “Parties in Villas in Knokke

around the golf court. The villas have been designated [by
X2]
PV 116.799. Also in the villa of Maurice Lippens. Parties with

underage girls in the Cromwell hotel in Knokke. Present:
Delvoie – Karel – X2 – Lippens – Van Gheluwe – Etienne
Davignon. The girls knew where to go and with whom.
Lippens hits the little girls.”
By the way, just for interest’s sake, the Countess Maurice

Lippens and Jean-Pierre de Launoit (chairman) are members
of the support committee (Steuncomite) of the Belgian Kids
Fund. Also, Barbara de Selliers de Moranville co-organized a
huge party for 3500 children in the garden of Countess
François d’Ansembourg’s property, as part of the Belgian
Kids Foundation for Pediatric Research.
To continue, the “child hunting” parties in the woods came

up:
PV 151.044, March 27, 1997: “The events in Chimay [X2].

She went 5-6 times. In an immense wood… She was forced
to go. She was never a [visual] witness of whatever was
done. Participated: the most violent of the group in Knokke,
among them the Lippens brothers. In Chimay she heard
shouting and gunfire… It was around the Castle of Chimay.
Pause for a moment to think about the child’s mind in the

forest at night, with those people, given a “sporting chance”
to get away, knowing what would happen when inevitably
caught. It’s too bizarre to accept for most minds, that anyone
could possibly be capable of such acts.
From the testimony:
PV 118.383, December 13, 1996, ‘Interview with X2’: “She

frequented the Platos… After midnight: orgies, sometimes
with consenting minors of 14 to 15 years. At the time of an
orgy she had sex with Karel van Miert…. he strangled her
until she almost lost consciousness.”
PV 150.565, March 4, 1997, ‘Identification of persons cited by

X2’: “Karel van Miert (17/01/42). Ex-président SP; Député
européen; Commissaire européen.”
Count Yann de Meeus d’Argenteuil [from a lunatic asylum so

read into it what you will] alleged in 1999 that the Boëls and
Janssens, both major shareholders in Solvay, were accused
of trade in drugs and children. On November 11, 2000, Count
Yann committed suicide.
Others are mentioned.
PV 151.829, June 2, 1997: “[X3] recognized the regent

Charles, King Baudouin and King Albert, and two others that
she calls Charly [De Pauw] and Polo [Paul Vanden
Boeynants]… A hunt is prepared by Charly and Polo… Gilles
(12 years old??) was castrated by Polo… Baby pulled out of
the stomach and given to the dogs by Polo [Paul Vanden
Boeynants].”
October 14, 1997, regular session [pdf] of the Belgian

Chamber of Representatives:
“The latter [Maud Sarr, detractors say unreliable in general]

testified that there existed video recordings [of paedophilia
during orgies], which were in the possession of the lawyer
Guy Francois. [Congressman/Senator Hugo] Coveliers
stated: “This claim has never been investigated.”
In an interview with VTM Maud Sarr gave the names of Paul

Vanden Boeynants and attorney-general Jaspar [prosecuted
the CCC bombers]…. According to Gijsels, the names of
prosecutor of the king Jean Depretre and gendarme
commandant Léon François were also mentioned.”
Two of the most prominent

names in the X-Dossiers
are Paul Vanden Boeynants
and Baron Benoit de
Bonvoisin. Vanden
Boeynants was accused by
X1, X3 and X4 of being a
violent child abuser and/or a person involved in hunts on
children.
1999, Marie-Jeanne Van Heeswyck, Annemie Bulté, and

Douglas De Coninck, ‘De X-Dossiers’, p. 165-166, 259-260:
At the time, she talked about a secret studio where snuff
movies were recorded. On the E40 Brussels-Luik she had
pointed to exit Sterrebeek.
From there she made the inspectors drive until a crossing.

‘Go left here’, she said. A few miles down the road she made
the car stop. That’s it, ‘the factory’. De Pauw looked and saw
a large board with a name on it [ASCO]. It was the company
of a business friend [Roger Boas] of a politician pointed out
by X1 [Paul Vanden Boeynants]
De Pauw himself was with the inspectors? Interesting. By far

the most convincing evidence was gathered against the
Lippens family, of which three members were accused by
about half a dozen witnesses of the same type of extreme
abuse. And somehow another children’s organization comes
into the picture:
Child Focus, or the European Center for Missing and Sexually

Exploited Children, was founded in 1998 by Daniel Cardon de
Lichtbuer and headed by this person ever since. In 2005, de
Lichtbuer became chairman of the International Centre for
Missing and Exploited Children (ICMEC), headquartered in
Washington and founded in 1999.
Formerly with Banque Bruxelles Lambert, the Belgian

Bankers’ Association, VP Bank Liechtenstein (with Nikolaus
von Liechtenstein), Thomas Cook Traveller Cheques, and the
European Financial Marketing Association.
He is also a member of the honorary committee of Cercle de

Lorraine, together with Maurice Lippens and Etienne
Davignon and is honorary executive president of the
Koninklijke Vereniging der Historische Woonsteden en Tuinen
van België, together with Prince Alexander de Merode (former
chair) and Count Ghislain d’Ursel. Davignon used to be a
board member too.
Now, why is this important?
Well, for starters because the Lippens family appears all over
the X-Dossiers. X1, X2, X4, and two anonymous letters all
name Maurice Lippens and his brother Leopold, the long time
mayor of Knokke, as vicious child abusers, not only involved
in regular rape, but also in the snuff network. Additionally, a
relative, Count Francois Lippens, the honorary consul general
of Belgium, appears somewhere deep in the Dutroux dossier.
“Transmitted to examining magistrate Mr. Langlois in

Neufchâteau, his dossier 86/0/96 [April 22, 1998]… Annex
161. A note on the existence of a snuff network of which Mr.
Glatz of the CIDE would have had knowledge and in which
one would find a certain François Lippens, who is close to the
mayor of Knokke, whose name is often mentioned in very
horrible activities. I conducted no verification or crosscheck.”
Etienne Davignon is another person whose name comes up

in the X-Dossier, although he has not been implicated to the
extent of the Lippens family. X2, the police officer, apparently
was the only one to mention him.
X2 speaks of two Karels in her testimony. The first one is a

high official in a Brussels court, whose mistress she was.
The other one is Dr. Karel van Miert . De Moranvilles and
Karel van Miert are major shareholders of Solvay.
Karel was a Member of the European Parliament from 1979

to 1985 and from 1989 to 1994, went to the Bilderberg in
1993, was vice president of the advisory council of the
European Policy Centre, a liberal globalist institution with
advisors including Peter Sutherland, Max Kohnstamm and
Lord Kerr of Kinlochard, a member of the Brussels
Freemasonry lodge Erasmus and a member of the Grand
Lodge of Belgium.
He succeeded Etienne Davignon as a director of Solvay in

2003, is a member of the Advisory Board of La Maison de
l’Europe of Bibliothèque Solvay, a member of the advisory
boards of Goldman Sachs, Eli Lilly, and Agfa-Gevaert,
director of De Persgroep [The Press Group].
And so it goes on.
The de Merode family, for instance. Prince Alexandre de

Merode was mentioned by both Nathalie W. and X4 as a
central player in the child abuse and murder network.
Additionally, X2, who was spared the worst abuse, mentioned
having been in the presence of the “Merode brothers”
(apparently Prince Baudouin de Merode, a Knight of Malta,

and his younger brother Lionel) together with other
aristocratic abusers.
Members of De Selliers De Moranville family can be found in

the Jesuits, Cercle de Lorraine, Banque Privée Edmond de
Rothschild in Genève, the European Bank for Reconstruction
and Development, Fortis, Solvay, and Coca-Cola Belgium.
Francoise Dehaye, whose husband was named by X2 as

being part of the abuse network, is a quality and innovation
manager at Solvay.
The Dutroux dossier mentions Chateau des Amerois, owned

by the Solvay family.
X2 spoke about a girl she had known who had been

murdered, and how this girl told her about the domain of
Princess Liliane de Rety (“a madwoman”) where children
were buried. Liliane was the second wife of King Leopold III
(d. 1983) and lived until her death in 2002 at Chateau
d’Argenteuil. In 2004, the Delwart family, shareholders of
Solvay, bought the domain. X2 mentioned having seen Prince
Laurent, the brother of Belgium’s present crown prince at
these parties.
And still it goes on.
The testimony was not debunked – things like “he could not
possibly have been there at this time -just denied and
stricken from the record. Now, in a society where one is
innocent until proven guilty, every one of these members of
Them is lilywhite innocent of any wrong doing [except what
they were actually convicted of in the financial area], multiple
eyewitnesses notwithstanding.
The concern of this post is not their individual guilt or

innocence. The concern is this – would you knowingly allow
your child to go to a children’s camp organized by the wife of
one or more of the names above or would you err on the side
of caution?
The Angers story: April 25, 2005, Time Magazine – Europe:
They brought in customers who “had money, made

appointments, and were punctual,” Rouiller says. One man
paid €458 for one sexual assault on a child, and Franck V.’s
wife, Patricia, regularly took in about €1,200 a month. “Franck
had telephone calls from the whole of France,” says Rouiller.
“He’s a poor miserable man with no intelligence. He had no
reason to have contact with people in Montpellier or Lille.”

Much like the paedophilia scandal that rocked Belgium in
1996, Angers is awash in suspicions that a wider ring of
wealthy customers was among the child rapists, and is still at
large.”
The self-perpetuating nature of it: August 19, 1996, The

Times:
Chief Superintendent Brian Mackenzie, president of the

Police Superintendents’ Association, said yesterday: “They
operate like any other special interest group. Networks and
rings form by word of mouth. “Individuals will exchange
pornography and quite often they will pass compliant
juveniles between groups. The whole thing spreads out and it
is difficult for the police to break down.”
The networks can be very complex and in one case children

who had run away from homes had been lured to London by
a “safe” name and address, forced into a paedophile ring and,
as they got older, were made to abuse recent arrivals. The
aim was to turn the children into perpetrators, making it less
likely that they would complain to the police… Children have
been kidnapped by paedophile rings who make and sell
videos featuring child sex abuse.”
The following came from X1:
Trying to get new children to voluntarily have homosexual sex

is very popular (“You’re a big girl now, don’t be childish”, etc.),
just as overwhelming young, extremely neglected children
(like X1) with presents and attention, soon followed by the
abuser sexually touching the victim. If the child allows the
touching, i.e. “volunteers” (after given a few hints by the
abuser, thinks: “this person is so good to me, why am I so
childish or selfish to refuse him something as simple as
sex?”), the game continues with regular beatings for
“underperforming” with accusations that as worthless the child
already is, he or she can’t even satisfy the one person who
truly “loves” him or her.
There are several variations, but this is approximately how

the initial psychological game works. Often, in later stages,
everything is just about avoiding the pain or not having to deal
with the guilt of someone else being tortured for the mistakes
you made. Depends on the type of network a child ends up in.
Not good.
On the video one could see how a crying four year old girl
was raped in the doctor’s cabinet by a criminal dressed as a

doctor, while a 12 year old girl had to play nurse and came in
with the necessary instruments on a platter… The videos are
very expensive (up to 30,000 euros a piece) and primarily find
their way to pedocriminal networks.”
X11’s testimony:
Carine Dellaert. According to XI, it was V. (she gave her first

name). She added: “They killed her, too. Clo told me that she
was called V.” During questioning on 25 October, statement
no. 116.018, XI said: “This happened in a house in Ghent. Clo
was there, too […] They tortured her with knives and scissors.
Someone broke a bottle and rubbed the fragments into her
vagina. Then they cut her in various places with razor-
blades.”
X1:
PV 118.869, December 12, 1996: “When the contractions

started her [X1’s] grandmother made a phone call. The
Lippens brothers, Vanden Boeynants and the assistant
commissioner of Knokke arrived. [Baron] De Bonvoisin and
Vander Elst arrived thereafter… Vander Elst puts a knife on
her throat while Bonvoisin rapes her… She must masturbate
while Vander Elst makes a number of photos. Lippens rapes
her with a razor blade.”
Enough.
It needs a sense of proportion in that the Belgian town [near

the start of the post] raised the question that if the butcher,
the baker and the candlestick maker were all into the 11 year
old girl, would you also have a dip, if you knew 1] you’d get
away with it; 2] it was par for the course; 3] not to or to
protest might place you in danger from some very guilty
townsfolk.
To me, there’s a continuum and that case is about halfway

along. At the sewer end of the continuum are these alleged
counts and barons. Leaving aside the actual names, as they
have never been personally convicted and are therefore to
be presumed innocent, could you ever do such things as in
that last quote?
We’re all aware of false rape allegations and there’ve been a

hell of a lot of them of late, which doesn’t do the cause of
women any favours whatever. To jump from that, however, to
“all allegations made by girls are false” is, IMHO, a step too
far, particularly in the type of detail those eleven witnesses

conveyed, which was much of a muchness.
Let’s hypothetically assume, for the moment, that they might

have been correct, the witnesses. The implications for
society are clear and for the safety of our children, let alone
our own safety. One trumped up charge, one stint in prison
and there might well be a reception committee awaiting us.
There will be deep anger at this “farrago of lies” peddled on

the strength of discredited witnesses [discredited by the
accused, of course]. There’ll be False Memory Syndrome,
revered “authorities” trotted out to debunk it … or else there’ll
be complete silence, as there has been.
I’d like to address the question of how any human being

could possibly do such things to a child, let alone to an adult.
I’ve deliberately steered clear of any talk of DID, MPD or
Satanists because I didn’t want to cloud the issue by giving
detractors the fuel they needed. There were copious
references, even in the names the children were made to
assume, of the occult, e.g. Abbraxas. I’ve not addressed
those for the reasons just stated.
Which comes back to the plain, unadorned question again –

how could any human being, however depraved and drug-
ravaged, possibly do such things to a child, let alone an
adult? Let’s split this into two different questions:
1, How could this baronial class, the ancient families, do

such inhuman things with such impunity, with such disregard
for human sanctity? An answer suggests itself – this set of
people has been in control for centuries, if not millennia and
who or what has ever acted to curb their excesses? Who or
what has ever had the power or been in the position to
prevent it? And as their influence was always, historically,
confined to a village here or there, then there’d be vague
rumours but nothing definitively pinned on them … until, that
is, the era of modern technological communication. To inbred
and diseased minds, ripping a baby from a child’s womb
might be little different to carving up the prey at the end of a
kill.
2. If that one is at least understandable [and read the

description of the Bollinger in Waugh’s Decline and Fall],
then what about the heads of corporations, late risers in the

world? With no intergenerational history of such things, how
do they live with themselves if they have, in fact, joined in
with this? I think of Niehoul here and the wheelers and
dealers of Davos?
The explanation might be that men [and women] of this type,

being offered the prospect of absolute freedom from
constraint, the satanist “do as thou wilt” in full fury, no
comeback, full protection, would find it near impossible to
refuse. Already powerful, rich, famous, respected in the
community, here they are being offered the chance to
indulge their worst lusts and not only that, to have the power
of life and death over that human being, that lesser creature
they’re abusing. The intoxication of absolute power, so far
above the common herd that the usual rules don’t apply to
them, could easily lead to addiction, almost an affirmation of
their place as wheelers and dealers of the world.
And by the way, these are the very people who, being the
movers and shakers, are also in charge of our own destinies
too -from the politicians to the money to that minor officer at
the council, to the EC – and this is the calibre of person we
are subject to? In a minor example, look at the Westminster
expenses scammers and one of them, the Chipmunk,
interviewed about it. She felt zero remorse in that clip.
And another question – how did that baronial class get to be

the baronial class in the first place? Speak to a Christian and
he’ll be under no illusion a to the answer. Speak to a secular
person and he’ll be wondering for donkeys’ years.
Will people rise up on this issue? Hardly. For a start, where is

the final proof of the guilt of these people? Sure the paedo
networks have been established and the industry exists – the
films, real or faked, whatever, have been seen by law
enforcement. The people accused above though will say it
was someone else they knew nothing about.
Nailing them is of importance, in that it is the way to prevent

it going on any more but the prime directive is surely the
protection of children, particularly in Belgium and around
Omaha and Seattle, for example. It needs an Eliot Ness
though, a Jim Garrison without the flaws and I don’t see too
many of those about.
Plus there is such a backlash against false accusations, such

mocking of “for the cheeeldren”, that as well as innocent
males being protected, the real perpetrators can continue
with impunity. This post names quite a few names and even
though it’s mere reportage, it still brings those names to light.
I personally have not one ounce of proof on any of them, not
a sausage. If I’m asked to take this down, I’ll have to, without
question.
So, what can be done? Sure the numbers are just a few
thousand children, a mere drop in the ocean. Sure those
children were more often than not already flotsam. Sure we
can’t solve every problem in the world, certainly not through
a blog.
What can be done?
One small thing which can be done is for males [and those
females who also indulge] to clear their porn stash today –
delete it. Then, if you have to look, avoid any images of
someone looking as young as the girl on the right here – you
know very well who’s under an appropriate age and who’s
not – and basically starve the mafia of your custom. Stick to
MILFs and if that can’t be guaranteed safe, then at least
you’ve done what you can.
That will then drive the price to the rich and famous through
the stratosphere, which will barely inconvenience them and
let’s face it – the type of material we’re talking about in this
post hardly seems your Club Seventeen but how do you
know how much crossover there is? How do you know where
that girl you just looked at ends up or what her other life is?
You’re told she’s happy and earning a living but how can you
tell? The market rules and if the market collapses, then I
think much of the exploitation might not be worth the candle
for them any more. What I’m getting at is that it will go back
to the Rodox type and there’s always going to be a
percentage that can’t be helped but the rampant trafficking
might well have its back broken.
Just a suggestion.
………..
The girl in the photo top

left was Carine Dellaert.
Her grandmother phoned
the ring when contractions
began, they took her
away, raped and tortured
her in childbirth, she died
of blood loss, her decomposing body later found in a cesspit.
The girl to the right here was Christine van Hees, repeatedly
raped, taken to an abandoned champignon factory, tied up,
doused with petrol and set alight. Burned notebooks and a
satchel belonging to her were found in the same building
later.
…………
The bulk of the material came from here and here.
………..
Oh and remember this?
← Who, exactly, is to blame Why Big Business quite likes

for the state of our nation? VAT →
3 comments for “The missing

children”
Able
March 21, 2012 at 1:34 pm
Oh Dear Lord Almighty! It is at times like

this I struggle to see any reason that the
total annihilation of, what appears at times
to be oxymoronic, ‘humanity’ would not
make the world a better place.
To think I had been labouring under the

misapprehension that I had a vague idea
as to the depths of depravity which some
will sink to. How wrong I was!
Churchmouse
March 21, 2012 at 1:36 pm
Thank you for this post, James — excellent

research and a message we need to read.
I must admit, I cannot read much about

these cases without becoming nauseated.
There really is evil in the world.
There is another ancient concept

connected with this type of abuse, which is
adults seeing children as ‘poison
containers’:
http://churchmousec.wordpress.com/2012/
03/20/carnality-children-historically-seen-
as-poison-containers/
As for corporal punishment, yes, it is

necessary, but not in the relentless,
systematic way fundamentalist Protestants
in the United States use it. All this outer
‘piety’ on their part is a load of bunk.
They’ve maimed (physically as well as
mentally) and sometimes killed their
children through it.
Maaarrghk!
March 26, 2012 at 5:49 am
I was in Brussells the week after the White

Demo’ and have followed the Detroux case
with some interest over the years, watching
the implications becoming steadily smaller
as the investigations were narrowed down
to make it look like he was acting almost
alone.
I still have an old VHS tape of a woman

who was able to take the film crew to a
farm where a lot of the abuse parties were
held. She authorities said she was a looney
and had never been to this place, but she
was able to describe in detail exactly what
modifications to the house the new owners
had made. Everything from the previous

wallpaper patterns to re-location of internal
walls.
Comments are closed.
Copyright © 2019 Orphans of Liberty. All Rights Reserved. The Magazine Basic Theme by bavotasan.com.

Madre Dela Oscuridad Belgica Solvay Family

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Madre Dela Oscuridad Belgica Solvay Family

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

The missing children – Orphans of Liberty 10/03/2019 00(23

Home About this site Policies

The missing children Not one penny Search …

Churchmouse is right on the money

artificial country, contrived from the Flemish and Walloons, it Auxiliary,

abuser’s tale? It was more or less a death bed testimony – as long as

She goes on to describe the culture where the well-heeled Shakedown g,

everyone knows about that. this Bozo, from

other pictures were made on order by other photographers. acy

In several boxes we find child pornography. … Hundreds of group-article- m

Dutroux. Protected again – by whom? Certainly the courts Public

societies is a crime.” USA

Four years old. An official pamphlet. Direct quote from the

“Fathers do not devote enough attention to the clitoris and

Google Bertelsmann and it reads like an old and honoured

Coming back to Belgium, the Church is also up to its neck in

The shadow of paedophilia returned to haunt Belgium when a

Where’s the white knight?

Hypothetical – if everyone was having a turn with the kid and

something stop you, something perhaps in your faith which is

Which immediately makes every person who took a dip into

It goes on and on and it needs complicity across a wide-

Police commissioner Georges Marnette played a central role

Once again, I’m not specifically accusing Georges Marnette,

How does Dutroux’s wife, who’s never shown any remorse,

The central erroneous belief in the Dutroux case and one

locked into the grid.

The cover-up and collusion caused 300 000 people to

Before he was sacked, Judge Connerotte had been

The day after Dutroux’s last abduction Nihoul gave £10,000-

Then a new witness came forward. Regina Louf, now aged

She told the investigator she had witnessed the murder of a

15-year-old girl at the hands of Nihoul, Dutroux and six

Her confidential testimony was taken by a team of police.

That is a key point – X1’s testimony was never shown, in

Pause for breath. I didn’t come to this story via Dutroux. I

The former name of Itaca International was “The LifeSkills

The Grand Duchy of Luxembourg bulletin of 28 December

lists a Denis Solvay living at that address.

The castle features in the story of one Marc Dutroux and is

Four names closely associated are Solvay, Janssen, Lippens

His [Davignon’s] family has intermarried with some of the

This post is not about Davignon but:

Together with his business partner Count Maurice Lippens,

According to one of the founders of the company, Jo Lernout,

Dutroux made claims, which were discounted, about Michel

They were also discounted because, by their very nature in

On A, half a dozen witnesses agree he’s a real beast, some

V 151.511, May 14, 1997: “X1 signals that VdBogaert, Vander

Naturally, the testimony of all the X witnesses was savaged

And so to other testimony

PV 117.535, November 19, 1996: “Parties in Villas in Knokke

PV 116.799. Also in the villa of Maurice Lippens. Parties with

By the way, just for interest’s sake, the Countess Maurice

To continue, the “child hunting” parties in the woods came

PV 151.044, March 27, 1997: “The events in Chimay [X2].

Pause for a moment to think about the child’s mind in the

From the testimony:

PV 118.383, December 13, 1996, ‘Interview with X2’: “She

PV 150.565, March 4, 1997, ‘Identification of persons cited by

Count Yann de Meeus d’Argenteuil [from a lunatic asylum so

Others are mentioned.

PV 151.829, June 2, 1997: “[X3] recognized the regent

October 14, 1997, regular session [pdf] of the Belgian