A Trip To Borobudur Temple

Last week, I spent my holiday in Jogjakarta. I went to Borobudur Temple. There, I

saw many tourists. Borobudur Temple was crowded in that holiday vacation. I could learn
and practice speaking English with one of foreign tourists. His name was Jack. He was very
friendly.. It was a very interesting vacation.

Sumber: http://ekspektasia.com/contoh-recount-text-pendek/

1.

Last week, I spent my holiday in Jogjakarta

A. Of time S F P C A. Of Place
Mood
Residue
Circ.Of Actor Material goal Circ. Of place
time
Theme: Marked Rheme
topical prepoitional
phrases

 The clause “Last week, I spent my holiday in Jogjakarta” if we analyzed by using

Semantic category of words. The result are the word last week as Adjunct of time, the
word I as Subject, the word spent as Finite and Predicator, the grouping words my
holiday as Complement, and the grouping words in Jogjakarta as Adjunct of Place
 The clause “Last week, I spent my holiday in Jogjakarta” if we analyzed by using
interpersonal meaning the result is that the group words “ I Spent” are categorized as
Mood, the group words “Last week. my holiday in Jogjakarta” are categorized as
Residue.
 The clause “Last week, I spent my holiday in Jogjakarta” if we analyzed by using
Ideational meaning the result is that word “Last week” is categorized as Circ. Of
Time, the word “I” is categorized as Actor, the word “Spent” is categorized as
Material, The group words “ My holiday” are categorized as Goal, and the group
words “ in Jogjakarta” are categorized as Circ. Of Place.
 The clause “Last week, I spent my holiday in Jogjakarta” if we analyzed by using
Textual Meaning the result is that the word “ Last Week, I” as Theme, and the words
“ Spent my holiday in Jogjakarta” as Rheme
2.
I went to Borobudur Temple
S F P A.Of Place
Mood Residue
Actor Material Circ. Of Place
Theme Rheme
 The clause “I went to Borobudur Temple” if we analyzed by using Semantic category
of words the result is that the word “I” as Subject, The word “Went” is divided into
 two elements, “did” as Finite and “go” as Predicator, the words “to Borobudur
Temple” as Adjunct of place.
 The clause “I went to Borobudur Temple” if we analyzed by using Interpersonal
meaning the result is that the group words “I went” are categorized as Mood, the
group words “ to Borobudur temple” are categorized as Residue.
 The clause “I went to Borobudur Temple” if we analyzed by using Ideational meaning
the result is that the word “I” is categorized as actor, the word “went” is categorized
as Material Process, the words “to Borobudur temple” as Circ. Of place.
 The clause “I went to Borobudur Temple” if we analyzed by using Textual meaning
the result is that the word “ I” as Theme, the words “ went to Borobudur temple” as
Rheme.

3. .
I saw many tourist
S F P C
Mood Residue
Behaver Behavioural Range
Theme Rheme
 The clause “I saw many tourist” if we analyzed by using Semantic category of words
the result is that the word “I” as Subject, The word “Saw” is divided into two
elements, “did” as Finite and “see” as Predicator, the words “many tourist” as
Complement
 The clause “I saw many tourist” if we analyzed by using Interpersonal meaning the
result is that the group words “I saw” are categorized as Mood, the group words “
many touriste” are categorized as Residue.
 The clause “I saw many tourist” if we analyzed by using Ideational meaning the result
is that the word “I” is categorized as Behaver, the word “saw is categorized as
Behavioural Process, the words “many tourist” as Range.
 The clause “I saw many tourist” if we analyzed by using Textual meaning the result is
that the word “ I” as Theme, the words “saw many tourist” as Rheme.