Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Introduction
Indian Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) are more process driven and further set to
become performance driven. The knowledge imparted and created in HEIs is a force for
national development. The career in or serving for HEI is rewarding for some critical reasons.
For academicians, job satisfaction is realized through teaching, research, consultancy, and
related intellectual challenges. At higher management and administrative level- strategizing
for performance and growth, and exhibit HEIs prowess regarding ranks may be an essential
challenge. At service-staff level, need for socialization and job security may be the critical
considerations. In general, a job in HEI ensures better socio-economic stature in the time of
growing uncertainty. Apart from providing a quality lifestyle for thy family and fascination
for onlookers, the implications for health, primarily due to physical inactivity and increase in
levels of stress could be severe.
Job in an HEI needs a fixed number of office hours to be physically clocked-in with a rare
scope for telecommuting. The educators and academic researchers are self-driven to work
much beyond the stipulated office hours to satisfy their intellectual thirst for knowledge and
also contribute their part in HEIs research goals. The service-staff have demanding physical-
activity schedule due to their job nature and on the other side office, and academic employees
starve for natural daylight. HEIs compare and strive to be better to be viable producers of
student workforce for corporate recruiters and diversify in new disciplines (faculty). To
mitigate the demand for sustainable advancement, the national and international rank of the
HEIs is an important index. Fulfilling the evaluation parameters at an institute or HEI level is
the responsibility of the team and sub-teams of employees. A share of accountability is thus
communicated to all employees down the line. Many of these evaluation parameters are
related to quality improvement and conduct of innovative practices in HEIs, which need
substantial ideation and efforts. The employment rationality, within a relatively secured job
environment, is thus linked to the status-performance conflict in the job role.
Coping with the increasing competition, state of losing the job by being redundant in the
system is the atypical risk in HEI job. In HEI job volatility, complexity, and job ambiguity
have been increasingly experienced. These may be sources of distress. The sedentary habits
and occupation-related problems may cause atypical health hazards. The employees operating
in such an environment, stress can quickly turn to pain, may lead to anxiety and depression.
Shortly, some Indian HEI employees may find it difficult to cope up with such ‘occupational
hazards' – the health problems related to work. Health welfare should be a matter of concern
for all and not treated simply as ‘HEI job phenomenon.' Though work performance is a good
antidote on overall psychophysical well-being and happiness (eustress effect), it also fuels
physical and mental strains (distress effect).
The knowledge workers in the HEI are also much involved in cognitive activities. The mental
exercise outcomes are interrelated to physical health outcomes. The traditional academic
duties have started taking newer forms. The new teaching-learning methodologies, such as
MOOC, MOODLE, OBE, Experiential learning, require much mental involvement and
patience. The measurable outcomes of academic activities are audited in various ways. This
continuous performance-feedback loop tests the stamina of the intellect. The much sought-
after transition of HEIs in India is to be recognized as varsity of research excellence.
Administrative roles are multitasked demanding.
The study would attempt to enable comprehension of employees' health-related patterns and
habits in various campuses of the University. This descriptive study with its deductive
approach would aim to be a foundation effort for preventive health assessments of the
university workforce. This scientific inquiry would highlight the University's noble intention
towards its employee's psycho-physical well-being.
Decision makers in Indian HEIs who intend to evolve the transition of HEIs to a physically
healthy workforce stand to benefit from this research. The expected low absenteeism, more
synergy, and happiness in work teams would relate to the derived win-win benefits, be the
dimensions worthy to be reviewed carefully. The three fundamental job nature in an HEI
demand employee role in service, administration and knowledge force. Beginning with
functional changes in health priorities, taking urgent actions to combat health ailments, could
overall inspire other HEI’s well-being policies development to define and compute wellness
index HEI’s based on physical fitness parameters of its employees. Widespread
implementable policy options would aid integration with other wellbeing practices.
Scope
Investigators would primarily attempt to focus study on physical health issues rather than
psychological ailments (source of deviance behaviors) in this study. This research work aims
to incorporate SIU affiliated employees working in its various Pune campuses. Presently we
do not include students as participants in the survey assuming health contingencies for these
young professionals is unlikely. Also, their physical association with the university is for a
fixed-short period of a few years. Although, the researchers appreciate the need to make
students aware and educate them regarding health benefits for their career and life. For the
students’ community, the awareness and education with regards to health hazards due to road
traffic accidents would be essential ‘parallel form’ of this proposed study. The researchers
would primarily limit the geographical limits of their investigation to SIU campuses in Pune
city and region. We would find reasons to comment about the external validity
(generalizability) of this study for similar HEI in India.
Interdisciplinary relevance
The study originates primarily from the two disciplines. One, in the socio-organizational
context it clarifies the integrity intention of the two stakeholders, namely, HEI health advisors
and the employees. Second, on health discipline context it spread the compelling message
regarding purpose and continuance of pro-health related behavior. The long-term investment
in one's health eventually benefits the individual employee regarding a prolonged and
successful career.
Objectives
This overall objective would specifically further state the specific goal as,
to ascertain the role of employee's self-health belief and readiness to mitigate health
priorities is the central theme of this proposed study.
Methodology
Diagnosis of existing qualitative data and exploratory results would decide the direction of
the comprehensive empirical survey to be undertaken. The path for further course of the
study could be ascertained by mining secondary data (- annual medical test data and fitness
test data, and feedback collected on continuous and planned recreational activities), the
extended nature of response given to the choices by employees, and information gathered
from the university's health experts mission. Primary data would attempt to estimate the
employees' ongoing health status beliefs based on specific health parameters. The study aims
to specifically state the health behavior change intervention (BCI) planning mechanisms.
Before initiating the policy formulation discussion as a mission to achieve ‘health conscious
workforce’ of the university, the researchers would attempt to rank and rationalize barriers in
this change program. The successful implementation of some component of behavior change
intervention may indicate social co-benefits for each campus community. The causality of
health state variation at campuses may be construed from patterns of employee designations,
campus locations, and gender types. Grouping of employees may be deduced, with practical
recommendations for each group and the University as a whole.
Taking cues from the socio-cognitive model of the perceived health risk (Rosenstock et al.,
1988); the study would investigate the extent of demand for the personal health risk
mitigation (wellbeing) as a preventive or restoring mechanism. The research problem
statement has a theoretical reference of Rosenstock’s HBM along with the trans-theoretical
model (stages of change). We would prescribe a composite mechanism to test the health
priorities of employees. These been fundamental theoretical approaches proposed to have
influenced employee study groups. The study groups are widely considered by gender (male,
female), designation (Academics, administration, and service-staff), age (unmarried and
below 30 years, married and below 40 years, 40-50, >50 years). 500 SIU employees would be
invited to participate in an adapted survey. Confirmatory structure among the derived latent
factors may be further tested for the conditional process analysis (for Analysis of mean and
covariance structure or Partial least squares path modeling method.)
Bibliography
Belkin, L. (2007). When whippersnappers and geezers collide. New York Times, p. G2.
Bittman, B., Bruhn, K. T., Stevens, C., Westengard, J., and Umbach, P. O. (2003).
Recreational Music-Making: A Cost-Effective Group Interdisciplinary Strategy for
Reducing Burnout and Improving Mood States in Long-Term Care Workers. Vol. 19,
No. 3/4.
Booth, M. L., Bauman, A., Owen, N., & Gore, C. J. (1997). Physical activity preferences
preferred sources of assistance and perceived barriers to increased activity among
physically inactive Australians. Preventive Medicine, 26, 131–137
Fluegge, E. R. (2008). Who Put The Fun In Functional? Fun At Work And Its Effects On Job
Performance.
Lehmann, A., Burkert, S., Daig, I., Glaesmer, H., Brähler, E. (2011). Subjective under
challenge at work and its impact on mental health.
Michie, S. (2002). Causes and Management of stress at work, Occup Environ Med., 2002;
59: 67–7
Mollick, E. and Rothbard, N. (2014). Mandatory Fun: Consent, Gamification and the Impact
of Games at Work. Management Department, The Wharton School, University of
Pennsylvania.
Reichert, F. F., Barros, A. D., & Domingues, M. R. (2007). The role of perceived personal
barriers to engagement in the leisure-time physical activity. American Journal of
Public Health, 97, 515–519.
Rosenstock, I. M., Strecher, V. J., & Becker, M. H. (1988). Social learning theory and the
health belief model.
Ruby, M. B., Dunn, E. W., Perrino, A., Gillis, R., & Viel, S. (2011). The invisible benefits of
exercise. Health Psychology, 30(1), 67-74.
Salmon, J., Owen, N., Crawford, D., Bauman, A., & Sallis, J. F. (2003). Physical activity and
sedentary behavior: A population-based study of barriers, enjoyment, and preference.
Health Psychology, 22, 178–188
Steven N. Blair, Yiling Cheng, And J. Scott Holder (2001). Is physical activity or physical
fitness more important in defining health benefits? The Cooper Institute, Dallas, TX,
Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 33, No. 6, Suppl., 2001, pp. S379–S399.
Usborne, E. and Taylor, D. M. (2010). The Role of Cultural identity clarity for Self-Concept
Clarity, Self-Esteem, and Subjective Well-Being.
Wilkins K. and Beaude, M. P. (1998). Work stress and health. Health Reports, Vol. 10, No. 3.